Eulerian Fluid simulation test! Zero-shot! Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3... vs Gemini 3 Deep Think! My personal preference: 🥇 Gemini 3 Deep Think (really strong!) 🥈 Opus 4.6 🥉 GPT 5.3 Highshow more

GPT 5.3 vs Opus 4.6: a second win for... Opus! ✔︎ Opus builds the file 2x faster ✔︎ Opus nails a good first version ❌ Codex needs 3x "fix bugs" to have a first working version ❌ Codex UI looks really bad Let's try more things....show more

Introducing WarpGrep v2. #1 on SWE-Bench Pro What if... code search was a separate, specialized model? w/ WarpGrep v2: #1 on SWE-Bench Pro Opus 4.6 → 57.5 (+2.1) Codex 5.3 (cli) → 59.1 (+3.1) MiniMax 2.5 → 57.6 (+3.7) without WarpGrep: Opus 4.6 (high) → 55.4 GPT-5.3 Codex (high) → 56.0 MiniMax 2.5 → 55.4show more

It's Christmas morning: OpenAI and Anthropic shipped new models... on the same day! We tested GPT 5.3 Codex vs. Opus 4.6 head-to-head. Verdict: the models are converging. Here’s what we found 🧵show more

🐐 Gemini 3 Pro GA One shot prompt is... in comment with the codepen link I repeat no model in this entire world able to implement this level of physics and spatial reasoning Not even Opus 4.6 and Gpt-5.3 codex , this is like a generation gap Sub Woofer submitted thisshow more

After a weekend of testing and working on something... with GPT-5.3-Codex & Opus 4.6, ChatGPT Pro + Claude Max 5x are still the best combo in my opinion Using Codex & Claude Code CLI running in tmux (the desktop apps are still a bit buggy) and they're accessible even on the go from iPhone with Termius (and VPN) Usually starting with GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh and Opus 4.6 in plan mode, discussing changes and options, and each writing their plans down to separate Markdown files Then letting GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh (or Opus 4.6) implement the changes as the first draft, then Opus 4.6 reviews them with a team of agents (works pretty well already with tmux even though still experimental) based on both prepared plans, fixes stuff, and then another review by GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh or vice versa Interesting that even Opus 4.6 still occasionally makes silly mistakes like wrong imports, partial or overly broad renaming of variables/functions, etc Fun fact, OpenAI apparently plans to use their Super Bowl ad to promote Codex - curious what that will look likeshow more

One prompt. 6 frontier coding models. "Create a realistic... fireworks show using HTML Canvas and JavaScript. No libraries." Some built a whole celebration. Others... lit a sparkler. The lineup: - GPT-5.3 Codex - Claude Opus 4.6 - Gemini 3.1 Pro - MiniMax M2.7 - GLM-5 - Kimi K2.5show more

Grok 4.1 Thinking ranks #2 on Text Arena, outperforms... the latest Claude Opus 4.5, GPT-5.2 high, Gemini 3 flashshow more

Claude Opus 4.6 is available for all users in... Orchids right now! Tag Orchids with any app idea and we’ll give you 100k in free credits to test it out. Comparisons to Opus 4.5, GPT-5.2-Codex, Gemini 3 Flash, and Kimi K2.5 👇 Prompt: Make me an interactive, 3d model of the solar system.show more

Just shipped v2 of my flight sim inspired by... @levelsio! You can now fly anywhere on Earth: - NY - Hong Kong - Rio - Your hometown - Literally anywhere Speedran this in ~1hr using Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.3 since they both shipped today!show more

Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3 pro (1/9) prompt: Build... a single-file HTML/CSS/JS (no libs) demo that uses SVG to simulate a plant growing: stem extends, leaves sprout + unfurl with springy/windy “physics”, then seamlessly loops forever. my dear opus...what have you done...show more

Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.4 (High) (1/9) prompt: Build... a single-file HTML/CSS/JS (no libs) demo that uses SVG to simulate a plant growing: stem extends, leaves sprout + unfurl with springy/windy “physics”, then seamlessly loops forever. For the initial impressions I'm really impressed by GPT, for speed they both felt about the same, but gpt was still half cheaper than opus. I also much prefer the design and animation that gpt produced, physics on the leaves are super cool and it also loops pretty nicely whilst opus just fades out the plant. Still got a bunch of tests to run but this is really exciting.show more

用小龙虾做了个公众号排版工具 - 小龙虾自动指挥多种AI Agent - Opus 4.6：写开发计划和代码 - GPT-5.3-Codex：审核代码、单元测试... - Gemini-3.1-Pro： 设计、端到端自动测试 开源，欢迎参与贡献！被合并的代码将会自动发布线上。 体验： 代码：show more

We decided to take Paul Jankura’s Claude Opus 4.5... out for a test drive vs. the current #1 ranking model in Code Arena: Gemini 3 Pro. Same prompt, different outputs. Let’s take a look. Remember, your votes drive the leaderboards. We’ll see how Claude Opus 4.5 stacks up in the coming days! Check out some of the comparisons, like how Claude Opus 4.5 handled the “Pyramids of Giza” prompt, in thread. 🧵show more

so let me get this straight > OpenAI renamed... their whole division "AGI Deployment" > Jensen said AGI is "already in the room" and then ARC-AGI-3 drops and on a scale from 0 to 100% SOTA models score: GPT-5.4: 0.26% Gemini Pro: 0.37% Claude Opus 4.6: 0.25% Grok: literally 0% meanwhile 100% of human testers solved every single environment. first try. no instructions. no training. AGI is "in the room" brother it couldn't find the roomshow more

Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 (4/9) prompt: Build a production-quality... 3D flight-tracking web app using React + Vite + Three.js (react-three-fiber + drei) that visualizes live OpenSky aircraft data on a rotatable 3D Earth, with real-time plane motion, smooth interpolation, altitude-accurate positioning, and polished lighting/post-processing. Both models did really well on this one and honestly I’m impressed with both. GPT-5.4 had the nicer post-processing out of the box. I really liked the subtle light shimmer on the airplanes when rotating the planet, and the camera work when clicking a plane felt better overall. Opus 4.6 though had a few details I liked more. It automatically went and found a much nicer Earth texture on GitHub, while with GPT-5.4 I had to reprompt it to go look for a better one. I also preferred Opus’s plane model overall, it just looked more polished, whereas GPT-5.4’s plane asset looked a bit funny. One thing I noticed with GPT-5.4 is that when you click into the plane, the camera sometimes clips through the planet, which breaks the effect a bit. Opus handled that part more cleanly. Overall this felt like a strong result from both, just with different strengths. GPT-5.4 felt better on presentation and post-processing, while Opus had better asset choices and a more premium-looking Earth/plane combo.show more

STOP vibe coding Flappy Bird or Snake clones. AI... gamedev tools are EASIER than ever to use. So start building your dream game NOW. I made a point & click pirate adventure game: → 3D rigged characters → Level editor + Hotspots → Voice acting → Inventory No Unity. No Unreal. All vibe coded. Tools: → GPT 5.2 + GPT 5.3-Codex → Opus 4.6 → Nano Banana Pro → Elevenlabs → Seedance + Hailuo image-to-video → Three.js and Capacitor I've been posting my journey on X. You don't need to spend ages. All this was done during spare pockets of time. Just experiment. Keep trying new things.show more

HERMES AGENT NOW RUNS CLAUDE OPUS 5. NEAR FABLE... 5 INTELLIGENCE. HALF THE PRICE. SELF-VERIFIES ITS OWN WORK. AVAILABLE TODAY VIA NOUS PORTAL (20% OFF ALL MODELS). Anthropic shipped Opus 5 on July 24, 2026. same $5/$25 per million tokens as Opus 4.8. but the benchmarks tell a different story. WHAT CHANGED FROM OPUS 4.8: FrontierBench v0.1: Opus 5: 43.3%. Opus 4.8: 18.7%. 2.3x jump on the same test. ARC-AGI-3: Opus 5: 30.2%. 3x better than the next closest model. beat Fable 5 on 8 out of 13 benchmarks. at half the cost ($5/$25 vs $10/$50). same price as Opus 4.8. twice the intelligence. no reason to stay on 4.8. THE SPECS: model ID: claude-opus-5 context: 1M tokens (default and maximum) max output: 128K tokens thinking: on by default effort toggle: low / medium / high per request fast mode: $10/$50, 2.5x faster knowledge cutoff: May 2026 minimum cacheable prompt: 512 tokens (was 1,024) SELF-VERIFICATION (the biggest change): Opus 5 checks its own work automatically. Anthropic says: delete your verification prompts. "include a final verification step" now causes OVER-verification because the model already does it. for Hermes /goal tasks this is a direct upgrade. the judge checks evidence. the model also checks evidence. double layer of verification without extra tokens. EFFORT TOGGLE: low: fast, cheap, routine work. medium: balanced, daily tasks. high: full reasoning, complex problems. set per request. not a global switch. matches Hermes /reasoning command: /reasoning low (routine) /reasoning high (complex) Opus 5 effort toggle + Hermes reasoning control = precise cost management per turn. WHERE OPUS 5 FITS IN HERMES: DAILY DRIVER (replaces Opus 4.8): same price. 2.3x better benchmarks. set as your main model: Desktop app / Dashboard: Models → claude-opus-5 CHIEF OF STAFF: synthesis across multiple agents. reads Kanban, prioritizes, routes tasks. self-verification catches routing errors before they cascade. COMPLEX CODING: SOTA on agentic coding benchmarks. FrontierBench 43.3% = best public model for coding. set as coder profile model. /GOAL TASKS: self-verification + completion contracts = the model proves its work AND double-checks the proof. long-horizon goals finish correctly more often. MoA AGGREGATOR: strongest synthesis model at $5/$25. pair with GPT-5.6 and Grok 4.5 as references. Opus 5 aggregates. best quality at mid-range price. presets: max-quality: reference_models: - provider: openai-codex model: gpt-5.6-sol - provider: xai model: grok-4.5 aggregator: provider: anthropic model: claude-opus-5 COMPUTER USE: near-Fable 5 quality for browser automation. at half the token cost per session. computer_use tasks burn lots of vision tokens. Opus 5 halves that bill vs Fable 5. WHAT TO KEEP OPUS 5 AWAY FROM: cron monitoring: too expensive. use DeepSeek or no_agent mode. sub-agent grunt work: use GPT-5.6 Luna ($1/$6) or DeepSeek. auxiliary tasks: use Gemini Flash. routine web extraction: use a cheap model. Opus 5 is for the turns where quality compounds. planning, synthesis, verification, complex reasoning. budget models handle everything else. NOUS PORTAL: 20% OFF ALL MODELS Nous Portal currently runs a 20% discount on all models including Opus 5. $5/$25 official → $4/$20 through Nous Portal. the cheapest way to run Opus 5 right now. hermes setup --portal select claude-opus-5 as your model. discount applies automatically. Opus 5 replaces Opus 4.8 everywhere. same price. better at everything. no tradeoff. straight upgrade. hermes update /model claude-opus-5show more

MiniMax M2.5 is benchmaxed. I gave 4 models the... same prompt: Create a neon "OPEN" sign in HTML. GLM 5: Clean, classic neon. Nailed it. Claude Opus 4.6: Stylized with glow. Solid. Gemini 3 Pro: Cursive with bloom lighting. Creative. MiniMax M2.5: Spelled it "O b∈ N" with broken spacing. This model ranks #2 on BridgeBench with a 59.7 score and 100% completion rate. But it can't spell a 4-letter word. Benchmarks don't tell the whole story. A model can ace structured tasks and fail basic creative prompts. High score ≠ production ready.show more

Clawdbot × Google AI Ultra 最強コンボでできること 5選 ①Opus 4.5ほぼ使い放題... ②Gemini 3 Proにも切り替え可能 ③サブエージェントでもどっちも使える ④Antigravityで続き簡単にできる ⑤重いタスクはDeep Think使える しかも、LINEで完結。 詳細PDFはいいねと 「コンボ」とリプでDMします。show more

OpenAI 深夜放炸弹，GPT 5.4 来了！🤯 这次是真 “大一统” 了，推理、编程、操控电脑、搜索、百万 Token 上下文，一个模型全干了！之前得在不同模型之间反复横跳，现在一个... GPT 5.4 全搞定，恐怖的是每条线都拉到顶尖水平，几乎没有短板。 来看看跑分，SWE-Bench Pro 57.7% 编程登顶，FrontierMath 数学第一，ARC-AGI-2 抽象推理 83.3% 创下新高，把 Gemini 3.1 Pro 和 Opus 4.6 全踩脚下。幻觉率比 GPT-5.2 暴降 33%，工具搜索功能直接把 Token 消耗砍掉 47%，又准又省。 值得关注的是「原生操控电脑」能力，OSWorld-Verified 拿下 75% 成功率，超过了人类的 72.4%。也就是说，GPT 5.4 操作电脑比大部分人都熟练了😂 而且是真的能看截图，自己点鼠标键盘完成任务 实际工作能力的表现也很不错，在GDPval 测试里，GPT 5.4 拿了 83%，追平甚至超越行业专业人士！这个测试横跨 44 种职业，让 AI 真刀真枪交付成果，做 PPT、建 Excel 模型、写法律分析，也就是说 AI 干活比大多数打工人还靠谱了。 有意思的是，两天前 GPT 5.3 Instant 撞车 Gemini 3.1 同一天发布，算是给 GPT 5.4 铺路了，先出个日常对话版本，再放大招。 OpenAI 最近这波节奏很猛，短时间连发两个模型，明显是要把之前被 Claude 抢走的编程用户拉回来。 AI 模型的军备竞赛已经白热化了，你现在主力用的是哪个 AI 模型？打算换 GPT 5.4 试试吗？show more