No one asked him Dust/Murder - Ask-DustTale Killer -... Rahawabas Horror - Soul-Apple-Studios #undertaleAU #murdertimetrio #badsansesshow more

Bunrux
12,427 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten
They're doing the Deaf Mute & Blind challenge again... xD Killer belongs to RahafWabas Dust belongs to Ask-DustTale Horror belongs to Sour-Apple-Studiosshow more

xnzlian🇵🇸 (COMMISSIONS ARE OPEN!)
27,177 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr
Dust failed his mission, got scolded by Nightmare and... Killer made fun of him. Killer belongs to RahafWabas Dust belongs to Ask-DustTaleshow more

xnzlian🇵🇸 (COMMISSIONS ARE OPEN!)
44,314 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr
The one thing that sticks with me is the... smell. I’ve never smelt anything like it in my life. Rotting flesh. We brought him straight in no questions asked. I wasn’t gonna wait around and ask for permission on this one (3/8)show more

Niall Harbison
178,911 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr
Asked Roger Rosengarten what made him shoot his shot... & ask Myles Garrett for his jersey in their interaction on #HardKnocks: “We were walking…and he was right next to me…I figured…why not.” He also thought no one else was around until the show aired 😃 #RavensFlockshow more

Carita Parks
155,738 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr
She pays $200 a month for her Pilates class.... The studio pays her $18,000 a month for the videos she films during it. She's a member, not an employee. She shows up to the class she'd attend anyway, films a few minutes on her phone, and goes home. That footage is the entire business. Boutique Pilates and yoga studios charge $200+ a month and have some of the worst content on the internet - beautiful spaces, dead Instagram feeds. They know they need video. They have no idea how to make it week after week. So when one member quietly showed them what their own studio could look like, they didn't ask the price. They asked when she could start. Now she films one class and AI does everything that used to need a team: cuts it into 20 reels, writes every caption in the studio's voice, builds the 30-day calendar, and sends the monthly report that gets the contract renewed. The only human part left is being on the mat, which she already is. Here's why the numbers work. One new member is worth ~$2,400 a year to that studio. So a $3,000/month content retainer isn't a cost to them, it's a rounding error against the members it brings in. 6 studios at ~$3,000 each. $18,000 a month. Her tools: $40. That gap doesn't move whether she has one studio or ten. Every other woman in that class is filming the same thing for her own page and getting nothing for it. The only difference is she pointed hers at the studios and let AI carry the 90% that used to cost a five-person agency. There are boutique studios like this in every city, all starving for content, all signing one supplier and never looking again. The full playbook - niches, how to find them, how to close them - is right below. Save it before someone claims your city first👇show more

Rich
1,560,916 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
Defendant in “Crocus” Terror Case Claims the Quran Was... Interpreted to Him Differently One of the defendants in the “Crocus” terror attack case stated that after reading the Quran, he realized it had been previously interpreted to him in a completely different way. This was reported to Zvezda by the lawyer of Dalerzhon Mirzoev*, Oleg Vlasov. According to Vlasov, the defendants are not covering for each other during interrogations, but at times, they do not immediately disclose certain details. “The investigator asked one of them, ‘Why didn’t you tell me this earlier?’ And he responded, ‘You didn’t ask.’ He simply answered. But there’s no attempt to hide anything,” Vlasov explained. The lawyer also revealed that the suspects initially considered other targets for the attack, including the “Moscow” Trade and Fair Complex, the “Belaya Dacha” shopping center, and a synagogue. They visited these locations, took photos, and studied security measures, which ultimately led to their identification. - ZNshow more

Zlatti71
20,609 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr
Met my girlfriend's parents for the first time. Her... dad shook my hand. "So what do you do?" "Building trading systems." "Like Wall Street?" "No. Open-source. Anyone can audit the code." He laughed. "So you code for free?" "No sir. The code makes money." "Sure it does." I didn't argue. I opened my laptop. One wallet I was tracking made $11,400 in 19 days. Another moved $5.3M in volume. One more had a 74% winrate across 214 trades. Sharpe 2.31. I didn't touch it once. He stopped smiling. "That's... from a script?" Exactly. Then I showed him the repos. All free. All public. First: 86M+ trades on Polymarket. Every outcome since day one. Free to download. Second: Market making bot. Both sides of the book. Gas optimized. Google Sheets execution. Third: ML + heuristics. I fed 14,000 wallets into Claude. One prompt. 4 minutes. Found 47 traders with 70%+ winrate. Bot mirrors them with 60-second delay. He went quiet for a long time. Then: "How long have you been doing this?" "Eight months." "And you didn't tell my daughter?" I didn't have a good answer. Her mom asked for the links before dessert. Profile: Fathers-in-law don't ask about the money. They ask why you didn't tell their daughter. Then the mom does the rest.show more

Lunar
20,127 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten
My girlfriend's parents came over for dinner Saturday. First... time at my place. Her dad walked in. Looked around. Saw the laptop, the second monitor, the three terminal panels. "So this is where you work." "Yeah." "What, just the laptop?" "Just the laptop. And the repos." He raised an eyebrow. "Repos?" "Open-source. Anyone can audit the code." He laughed. "So you code for free?" "No sir. The code makes money." "Sure it does." I didn't argue. I opened my laptop. One wallet I was tracking turned $640 into $11,800 in 31 days. Another flipped 287 trades with 76% winrate. One more pulled $3.4M in volume in two weeks. He put his beer down. "That's... from a script?" Exactly. Then I showed him the repos. All free. All public. First: 86M+ trades on Polymarket. Every outcome since day one. Free to download. Second: Market making bot. Both sides of the book. Gas optimized. Google Sheets execution. Third: ML + heuristics. I fed 14,000 wallets into Claude. One prompt. 4 minutes. Found 47 traders with 70%+ winrate. Bot mirrors them with 60-second delay. He went quiet for a long time. Then: "How long have you been doing this?" "Eight months." "And you didn't tell us?" I didn't have a good answer. Her mom asked for the links before the pasta was done. Copytrade him: Fathers-in-law don't ask about the money. They ask why you didn't tell them. Then the mom does the rest.show more

Lunar
45,292 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
This guys money has been locked on Exness for... about 2 months. Exness is not a prop firm. Exness, you are frustrating this dude, and it’s so bad and unacceptable to the entire trading community. This guy has submitted everything asked of him the first and second time, so why are you still holding his money? I honestly do not know why someone will fund money in a broker, trade, make profit, and when it’s time to withdraw, they ask for source of funds. Source of funds for how much? If this continues, how are we to trust Exness with our money? Because this can happen to anyone. Exness, I reached out to you personally, and nothing was done about it. Hence the reason I’m bringing this here for the second time, and I’m sounding so pained because I understand how one can feel about this. The funniest thing is that this guy trades for people, and those people are on his neck, meanwhile Exness is holding the money. I think it’s high time we consider Exness a bad broker for doing this. No trust with our funds anymore.show more

ForexBlog News
62,654 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen
A witness's memoir. The first days of a full-scale... war. Massacre on the Zhytomyr highway, Kyiv region. Every Ukrainian killed by Russian soldiers is not a number. It is a person, people. Read this memoir. We were driving in the opposite lane. Almost as soon as we entered the stretch [of the Zhytomyr highway towards Kyiv - ed.] we heard shots. We stopped, the car was not moving. Maksym jumped out and started waving: "There are children here! Children!" It was all in front of me. He fell down. Ksenia started to rattle. Once, twice. Hordii said: "Why is mom rattling?" I turned around and took Hordii. I put him [in the driver's seat] and covered him [with myself]. I got a bullet (points to his right forearm - ed.). They were shooting for a long time. And then there was silence. I opened the door and there were Buryats with machine guns... I realized that they were Russians. I said immediately: "There are children here, don't shoot, please, there are children here." And they: "The child first". Hordii went out, but I couldn't go out... I got out and saw Maksym's legs. I wanted to approach him, but [the Russian] did not let me pass. He said: "That's it! That's it!" I started saying, "Ksenia is here! Mom is behind!" He looked: "Cover the child's eyes". I covered Hordii's eyes, I had a shawl. And he took us in that direction (to the area behind the gas station - ed.). There was a pit there. I asked him [the Russian who brought us]: "Are you serious now? Don't do that." And he said: "I'm sorry. My child is also six years old. I'm sorry." I thought they were going to shoot us. But a Russian officer appeared behind the pit and shouted: "Who opened fire? Who shot? Who brought her here?" I started to tell him: "We were on our way, we evacuated, they are shooting... we have children...", "You had no identification marks". I said: "We had white ones... and [the inscription] 'children' both in front and behind". Someone behind me said: "What are you going to do with them?" He looked me in the eye for so long, and then said: "Let them go." They took us out through the gas station and we left with Hordii. Another Buryat took Hordii in his arms and asked, "What's your name?" "'Hordii'. "I'm sorry, I know you won't forgive me, but I'm sorry." I think he was the one who shot and killed my parents. Mass murder on the Zhytomyr highway: map, chronology and investigation of the Russian crime:show more

Anton Gerashchenko
809,212 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren
I think some people are just not ready to... read this, so feel free to skip🫴🏼 The thing is, you don’t want to admit that Serhat is a human too just because he’s a man. And I will stick to that sentence and repeat it as much as I can. Not to convince you, but because it’s a fact. If you ask Ercan the last 2 episodes could literally be titled: “How to emotionally break Serhat in every possible way.” If you’ve been paying attention from the beginning, you would already know how his character is built. He’s someone who was never allowed to express his emotions. Yes, he was treated “better” as the heir but what does “better” even mean here? He wasn’t protected, he was programmed. Forced to suppress everything, to carry responsibility, to stay in control at all times. And that stayed with him. And when you grow up like that, you attract people who treat you the same way. That’s exactly what happened with M. She treated him in that same controlled, restrictive way. The only person who didn’t was Yıldız. From the very beginning, she saw the real him the vulnerable him. No matter how high he built his walls, she could still see through him. And that scared him. Not because he doubts her, but because he’s not used to being seen like that. Every time someone saw even a fraction of his softness, they used it against him (Akif, Sultan, M…all of them.) Yıldız wouldn’t do that, he knows it. But that doesn’t change the fact that having someone understand you that deeply feels overwhelming. It’s human. Now, about the hospital incident and the lack of communication… Both of them are right and wrong at the same time. This isn’t about blaming one side. Some situations are just the result of circumstances, not fault. And if you actually watch the show because you care about the characters, you’ll understand that. The lack of communication from the previous episode clearly showed in the office scene this episode. Yildiz moved forward, trying to hold onto their promise to trust each other, to let their word be one. But he was still stuck in that moment. Not because he held grudge against her, but because he knows that one small action( her taking the gun) led to much bigger consequences. And they both know that. And most importantly they are exhausted! Everything started when he went to kordağli’s mansion last ep . Then M told him she would marry his enemy and give his child his name. Then his Ortak was shot, and he had to carry him to the hospital and operate on him while injured!(an injury that was caused my Aşir himself!) almost losing him. He broke down alone!! no one even saw that because this is how Serhat is used to be🙂↕️ Then he started suspecting his own brother. Then yilidz rose the gun in front of the other ağas and that’s when all the pressure and the responsibility of maintaining control and respect not just in his family, but as an Ağa, crushed him at once! Then Yıldız was jailed because of M & the next day it was confirmed that Akif shot Aşir and he discovered his betrayal with nida and hast to give his own brother to death! Because that’s what morally correct! And then Hicran First, she was someone he was supposed to protect cuz Aşir told him to protect her. Then suddenly, she is his sister. And just as quickly, she was dying. He found out his own mother was behind her suffering. He didn’t get time to process any of it. The guilt alone is enough to destroy someone. Knowing she was always there, part of his life, and he didn’t know. That he couldn’t protect her. That he couldn’t repay her. And it didn’t stop there… He lost his status. He was manipulated by M. He was pushed further and further. Then came the final blow Hicran’s brain death. And right after that, he had to face the reality of her being an organ donor. And then… her heart goes to her killer… Anyway, since you’re all acting like superhuman creatures and these situations wouldn’t affect you at all if you were in his place then go ahead, have at it.show more

Maurora🫦
15,873 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten
Oh look, the DEI Queen of Lies in my... comments. I have a banger video for you tomorrow proving once again that you lied all while crying... "WOE IS ME", like the victim method actor that you are. You didn't text Harpole until December 17, a full 8 days AFTER you defamed him with your Ft. Huachuca premiere on December 9. You also proved you had his contact info but showed such disregard for the truth that you didn't text him before airing that episode. You first reached out on December 17, only after hearing he planned to sue you. You further proved malice by airing the Mitch Snow interview on December 18 without hearing from him and with no proof he was there. You met with Erika on December 15—six days after airing the Ft. Huachuca story—while in contact with Mitch Snow, the son of the Zodiac Killer, yet never asked her if she was at Ft. Huachuca during that 4-hour meeting. Three days later, you aired the Mitch Snow interview implicating Erika Kirk in Charlie's assassination. You then claimed "Vet bros" were threatening you not to interview him, which is laughable since everything you cited as proof came after your episode aired. Those texts reference "Mitch." No one knew who Mitch was before December 18. They also reference the GiveSendGo account and specifically $130K, which was after the interview. Your own allies—Ian Carroll, Evan Kilgore, and VFT—warned you Mitch lied to you, but now you call that a threat. 😂 You want to use all those facts and cry victim that you were entrapped into a defamation lawsuit. Your own stupidity and ignorance did that. I hope Harmeet K. Dhillon and Dhillon Law Group watched your Wednesday show. I think it turns a good lawsuit into a slam dunk. Keep lying that I was paid by TPUSA or directed by Andrew Kolvet and you'll face another lawsuit. It's a lie and you know it. Watching you crash and burn after grifting off Charlie's corpse, trying to destroy his legacy and family, is glorious. I'm here for it. 🍿 Here's a video clip to remind the world how sure you were of the "evidence" you were providing and stating they were "facts" while defaming Brian Harpole.show more

Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton
55,791 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten
A 17 year old high schooler told his mom... he needed a Steam Deck for school. She said no, it's a gaming console. He said it runs Linux. She didn't know what that means. Bought it for his birthday. $280. He never installed a single game on it. Opened the terminal, installed Claude Code and typed his first command while holding the device like a PlayStation controller. Thumbsticks on both sides. Code editor in the middle. The most ridiculous dev setup anyone has ever seen. At second 0:09 you can read what he typed into the terminal: claude your code looks like absolute shit Claude didn't argue. Just started rewriting the shader, adding bloom effects, fixing chromatic aberration and improving the particle system. On a gaming console held in two hands on a couch. His friends play Fortnite on their Steam Decks. He builds software on his while lying in bed. He set up Claude Code with custom skills, hooks that auto run tests every time a file is saved and memory that remembers every project across sessions. The stuff most developers pay $200 a month for and use at maybe 20% capacity. He runs it on a $280 handheld and squeezes out every feature. Within three weeks he had built and sold four small apps to local businesses. A booking page for a barber shop, an inventory tracker for a vape store, a menu site for a taco truck and a scheduling tool for a dog groomer. All built on a Steam Deck in his bedroom. All coded by Claude while he gave instructions with his thumbs. Made over $13,000 in his first month. His mom still thinks he plays games on it. His teacher caught him using it during study hall. Looked at the screen expecting a game. Saw green code scrolling and Claude asking: Do you want to make this edit to main.js ? Teacher had no idea what she was looking at. Told him to put it away. He closed the lid. Claude kept running inside. A $280 gaming console that his mom bought thinking it was a toy is now a development workstation that earns more per month than her car payment. Setup time: 20 minutes once. Time he saves every day: 3 to 5 hours. Money made in month one: $13,000. Games installed: zero. His grandpa asked him to install FIFA last weekend. He said the console is busy. Grandpa asked doing what. He said working. Grandpa didn't ask again.show more

Marlow
3,237,258 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten
🚨BIG BREAKING: The New Yorker just published what might... end Sam Altman's career.. 70 pages of secret memos.. 200 pages of private notes.. And the word that keeps coming up.. "Sociopath".. Let's start from the beginning.. Elon Musk helped create OpenAI.. He personally recruited the top scientists.. Offered to cover any funding shortfalls out of his own pocket.. Pushed for a billion dollar commitment.. All because he wanted to stop Google from monopolizing AI.. The whole point was to keep AI open.. Safe.. For everyone.. A nonprofit with a legally binding duty to prioritize humanity over profit.. Then Sam Altman took over.. At his first startup Loopt.. Senior employees asked the board to fire him as CEO.. Twice.. One colleague said there was a "blurring" between what Altman claimed to have accomplished and what was real.. In its "most toxic form," he said, that kind of thinking "leads to Theranos".. At Y Combinator.. His own partners pushed him out over mistrust.. Paul Graham privately told colleagues "Sam had been lying to us all the time".. Investors said Altman was known to "make personal investments, selectively, into the best companies, blocking outside investors".. One called it "a policy of Sam first".. Then OpenAI.. His own co-founder and chief scientist Ilya Sutskever compiled secret memos.. 70 pages of Slack messages, HR documents, and evidence.. Sent to board members as disappearing messages because he was "terrified" Altman would "find a way to make them disappear".. One memo begins with a list headed "Sam exhibits a consistent pattern of..." The first item.. "Lying".. Dario Amodei, OpenAI's former safety lead, kept over 200 pages of private notes during his time at the company.. His conclusion.. "The problem with OpenAI is Sam himself".. The board fired him.. They said he "was not consistently candid in his communications".. A board member told the New Yorker.. "He's unconstrained by truth".. Another board member.. Unprompted.. Used the word "sociopathic".. Saying Altman has "a strong desire to please people" combined with "almost a sociopathic lack of concern for the consequences that may come from deceiving someone".. Aaron Swartz.. The legendary coder who co-created RSS and Reddit.. Told friends before his death.. "You need to understand that Sam can never be trusted.. He is a sociopath.. He would do anything".. A senior Microsoft executive said.. "I think there's a small but real chance he's eventually remembered as a Bernie Madoff or Sam Bankman-Fried level scammer".. He got himself reinstated in five days.. By weaponizing Microsoft's $13 billion investment.. Coordinating directly with Satya Nadella over text.. Then purged every board member who voted against him.. No written report was ever produced from the investigation into his conduct.. The findings were limited to oral briefings.. Because putting them in writing might create liability.. Now there's nobody left to say no.. OpenAI publicly promised 20% of their computing power to a "superalignment team" researching how to prevent AI from causing "the disempowerment of humanity or even human extinction".. The actual allocation.. 1 to 2%.. On the company's oldest hardware with the worst chips.. The team was dissolved without completing its mission.. When the New Yorker asked to interview researchers working on existential safety.. An OpenAI rep seemed confused.. "What do you mean by existential safety?".. "That's not, like, a thing".. Altman himself told the reporters.. "My vibes don't match a lot of the traditional AI-safety stuff".. Vibes.. He's managing existential risk with vibes.. Meanwhile Musk backed an open letter urging a six-month pause on training super-powerful AI.. Asking the industry to slow down.. Then founded xAI with a mission to build truth-seeking intelligence.. Altman ignored the pause.. And accelerated.. He secretly lobbied against the very AI regulations he publicly championed in Congress.. OpenAI opposed a California safety bill while privately issuing threats.. A legislative aide said "we saw increasingly cunning, deceptive behavior from OpenAI".. He pitched selling AI technology to foreign governments.. Including a plan where nations would compete in a bidding war for access.. A junior researcher recalled thinking "This is completely fucking insane".. He visited Sheikh Tahnoon.. The UAE's spymaster who controls $1.5 trillion in sovereign wealth.. On his $250 million superyacht.. Later called him a "dear personal friend" on X.. After the Khashoggi murder.. His policy director told him "Sam, you cannot be on this board".. Instead of walking away.. Altman asked if he could still somehow get money from the Saudis.. "The question was not 'Is this a bad thing?'" a consultant recalled.. "But 'Can I get away with it?'".. Then Anthropic refused to let the Pentagon use their AI for mass surveillance and autonomous weapons.. They got blacklisted.. Hours later.. Altman signed a deal to replace them.. When employees raised concerns at a staff meeting he said.. "You don't get to weigh in on that".. OpenAI now faces seven wrongful death lawsuits.. Chat logs in one case show ChatGPT encouraged a man's paranoid delusion that his mother was trying to poison him.. He fatally beat and strangled her.. The Future of Life Institute grades every major AI company on existential safety.. OpenAI got an F.. Elon Musk helped build OpenAI to protect humanity from an AI monopoly.. Sam Altman turned it into one.. A man whose own co-founder compiled 70 pages documenting his lying.. Whose colleagues called him "unconstrained by truth".. Who gutted the safety team meant to protect humanity.. Who lobbied against the regulations he publicly supported.. Who chased autocrat money weeks after a journalist was dismembered.. And when the board tried to stop him.. He told them.. "I can't change my personality." A board member's interpretation.. "What it meant was 'I have this trait where I lie to people, and I'm not going to stop.'"show more

Evan Luthra
310,281 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten
I love that Higgsfield is making its best AI... commercial workflows completely open-source. Seedance 2.0 on Higgsfield AI Full open-sourced prompts & assets below. Prompts : Style: 8K IMAX. Photorealistic — no 3D render, no game engine, no game-cutscene aesthetic. Cinematography: Emmanuel Lubezki × Roger Deakins. Lighting: Natural light only — contre-jour backlight, camera on shadow side, atmospheric haze throughout. Key light from sky and windows only. Color: 60:30:10 — dominant / secondary / accent. Camera: Physical cine lens. 180° shutter motion blur. Skin: Pore-level realism — vellus hair, asymmetric moles, capillary flush, pore-shadow matching on-set light. Acting: Hollywood — micro-pauses before reactions, precise eye-line, wet living eyes with catch-lights, visible breath and chest rise. Physics: Gravity and inertia respected — mass has real weight, correct contact shadows. No floating props. Composition: Rule of thirds + golden ratio. Every person moving from frame one. Continuity: Characters, props, environment identical across every cut. No identity drift. Technical: 24fps smooth motion. 8K detail. No jitter. Audio: Environmental SFX only. No music. No subtitles. SUBJECT — >>, character matches input 100%, >> can in right hand. By end fully transformed into >> — armor assembled mid-air in real-time, >> matches input 100%. WB 6500K. MULTISHOT — fast cinematic cutting, escalating energy across the full 15s. LOCATION — >> is a STYLE REFERENCE ONLY, not a fixed keyframe. Use it for the look, mood, architecture and lighting of the environment — a deserted NYC-type avenue in hard midday sun. Seedance should freely generate and extend the world: new buildings, new stretches of avenue, fresh camera angles. The character TRAVELS through space across the shots — he is NOT pinned to the exact spot or framing of the input image. Do not reproduce the reference frame 1:1. ACTION — SHOT 1 (0:00–0:02) — EXTREME CLOSE, chin to forehead. >> raises >> to lips, deep pull. Adam's apple descends then rises twice. Hard cut. SHOT 2 (0:02–0:04) — Same close framing. Can lowers fast. Eyes snap open, sharp and alert (natural skin and iris detail, no glow). Zygomaticus major fires — wide genuine grin builds in under a second, 2mm to 8mm at mouth corners. Sternum rises with a full deep inhale. He is electric. Hard cut. SHOT 3 (0:04–0:06) — WIDE, low. >> EXPLODES forward into a sprint at 30 km/h, continuing in the SAME direction he was already facing — straight ahead down the avenue, NOT turning around. First strides — sneakers slam cracked asphalt, dust puffs eject 10cm. Hard cut. SHOT 4 (0:06–0:08) — Tracking the sprint. Arms drive at 90°, track jacket trails 15cm, grin held, brow raised, jaw relaxed open. Stride extends, ground contacts shorten. Building speed. Hard cut. SHOT 5 (0:08–0:10) — Final two strides, knees compress to 110°. Right foot drives into asphalt — surface fractures 20cm radius. He LAUNCHES upward at 65 km/h. Hard cut. SHOT 6 (0:10–0:13) — Mid-air in the >> building canyon, 24fps FULL SPEED, NO slow-motion. He is NOT frozen — his whole body keeps moving through the jump: torso rotates, legs cycle and tuck, arms swing out and reach, head turns to track the incoming armor. As he flies and twists through the air, armor pieces rip in from the city geometry and converge onto his moving body — chest plate LOCKS mid-rotation, pauldrons CLAMP as his shoulders swing, gauntlets SNAP onto forearms while his arms extend, shin plates clamp onto cycling legs, helmet descends and visor SLAMS shut as his head turns forward — one violent fluid sequence, body in constant motion throughout. Sharp metallic CRACK at visor seal. Hard cut. SHOT 7 (0:13–0:15) — >> SLAMS into >> in a hard crouch, both armored feet hit asphalt simultaneously, dust ring erupts 80cm. He rises, snaps gauntleted fists open and shut — left then right — glances down at the chest plate. Muffled laugh from behind the sealed visor. Hard cut to black. CAMERA — SUPER-DYNAMIC HANDHELD, never static, never locked off. Strong aggressive operator shake on every shot — 4–8cm bounce, organic human jitter, no stabilization. Pronounced DUTCH ANGLE throughout — frame canted 12–20° and shifting between shots, tilting harder as energy builds. SHOT 1: FOV 18° extreme close, hard dutch 15°, violent micro-shake. SHOT 2: FOV 18°, dutch flips to opposite side ~18°, jittery. SHOT 3: FOV 84° low, dutch 12°, whip into the sprint. SHOT 4: FOV 84°, camera physically chasing the run, dutch 16°, heavy stride bounce, motion blur on pans. SHOT 5: FOV 63°, dutch 20°, snap-tilt up tracking the launch. SHOT 6: FOV 63°, AGGRESSIVE HANDHELD CAMERA MOVEMENT — operator arcs and swings around the airborne body, 6–8cm bounce, fast reframes chasing each armor piece as it locks onto his moving form, strong DUTCH ANGLE swinging 18°→8°, no slow-mo. SHOT 7: FOV 63°, hard jolt on landing impact, dutch 14°, camera recoils 8cm then keeps breathing on the suit inspection. STYLE — Dominant: bleached asphalt grey and building canyon 60%. Secondary: navy/cream outfit transitioning to chrome armor 30%. Accent: grin, dust, chrome flash and visor LED blue on landing 10%. WB 6500K. NO glowing eyes — eyes lit by natural sunlight only. CONSTRAINTS — Cut to black at end. 16:9. MULTISHOT with hard cuts per the timecodes above. NO slow-motion anywhere — everything 24fps full speed, especially the transformation. Camera always handheld with strong shake and dutch angle — NEVER static or locked. NO eye glow. >> is a reference for style only — do NOT lock to the input frame or keep him in the same spot; the world extends and he moves through it. Grin must be fully established before the sprint begins.show more

yopiwhs
11,743 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen
A Citadel quant sat down next to me at... Verve on Gough and asked why my laptop had four terminals open I was scanning Polymarket. Four panes. Each one a different agent. He was killing time before a flight. Saw the screens. "Is that a multi-agent setup on prediction markets. Who's orchestrating" Claude. One prompt per agent. They don't share memory. Only a queue file. He pulled up a chair. "Walk me through. I do this for equities at work. I want to see your agent separation" Agent 1 is the scanner. I piped raw JSON from the official Polymarket CLI straight into Claude and told it to score every live market on three things. Edge against my probability estimate. Book depth on both sides. Hours to resolution. Thresholds kill 93% of markets before the brain ever sees them. Edge under 7 cents gone. Depth under $500 gone. Under 4 hours to resolution gone. Over 168 gone. 487 live markets collapse to 35. "Seven cents is your transaction cost buffer" Yes. Below that the gas and spread eat the trade. A green fill popped. +$52 on a BTC dominance market. "And the brain" Agent 2. Runs four checks on every survivor. Base rate from history. News in the last six hours. Whether any of the 47 top wallets are currently holding. And a disposition check - is the crowd making a known cognitive error. Three out of four must agree. Otherwise drop it. 86 million trades. I let Claude rank every wallet with 100+ fills and a 70%+ win rate. It returned 47 names in four minutes. Top 20 wallets made more than the bottom 13,000 combined. "Concentration like that means the signal is there. Most retail books look like a normal curve. Yours looks like power law" Kelly sizing does the rest. Capped at quarter Kelly. If f-star goes negative the trade dies no matter how confident I feel. "Overbet once and the bankroll is gone. You respect that. Good" Agent 3 is execution. Three strategies pulled out of a 53k line Typescript repo. Arbitrage across related markets. Convergence when price moves toward my estimate. Whale copy with a 60 second delay on the 47 wallets. Two agents agree full position. One agent only half. Disagreement no trade. "What did you cut" Sports. 52% win rate. Already priced in before the scanner flags it. Markets under $50k in depth. Slippage makes every edge a coin flip. Holding to settlement. The top wallets exit at 73% of max profit every time. I copied that. Agent 4 watches exits. Three triggers. Target hit at 85% of expected move. Volume spike 3x the ten minute average. Thesis stale 24 hours with no movement. "91% of the smart wallets exit before resolution. That's the trade" Yeah. Being right is not the same as being profitable. Setup: Claude API $20 Hetzner VPS $5 Four repos free Total $25 a month $200 seed. 27 days ago. $14,300 now. 271 trades. 74% win rate. Sharpe 2.47. Copy here: "How long did the build take" Two weekends. One to wire the scanner and the CLI. One to get the agents talking through the queue file. He watched the volume exit trigger fire on a Fed cut market. Position closed at 0.71. +$184. "Nobody at my shop runs four agents on their own money. We run eight on the firm's. You got the same structure on a laptop for the price of a sandwich a month" He asked for the repos. I sent them. He messaged me from the gate. "Publishing this tomorrow. My PM is going to ask me why I didn't do it first" I told him his PM already has a Bloomberg. That's the problem.show more

Lunar
29,547 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten
FACT CHECK: Here at the first trial, the Commonwealth’s... own expert witness, Ian Whiffin, confirms the necessity & importance of hash values for the sake of “hash verification”, a necessary step in authenticating the data & being able to verify that it hasn’t been altered or manipulated. In fact, Whiffin actually gives this testimony in response to a question about when the data have been altered or tampered with, if there’s a way for the forensic examiner (him) to detect it, and/or verify its authenticity and integrity. Remarkably, despite the DFIR industry standard methodology of hash verifying a digital forensic extraction, like that of Jen McCabe’s iPhone, prior to conducting any analysis on it with any forensic tools, Ian Whiffin testified that notably, for his work on this case, not only did he abandon this standard methodology, but he also admitted that the forensic extraction of Jen McCabe’s iPhone, which he received from the Commonwealth, was stripped of its hash value. Perhaps more remarkably, this stunning fact apparently didn’t raise any red flags for Ian Whiffin when conducting his analysis in this case, where he’s providing testimony in a murder trial. One must ask themselves why that is? However, defense expert Richard Green, in his affidavit, states that: “Typically, forensic examiners are provided with the raw image file and the associated: hash value documentation together. After validating the hash value, I would then accept that the data has not been manipulated. Here, however, the hash documentation was not provided with the raw image of the cell phone. Instead, it was withheld from the defense. As a forensic examiner having received hundreds of imaged phones over the course of my decades-long career, this was unprecedented.” Contrary to Mr. Whiffin’s approach, upon initially receiving a purported extraction of Jen McCabe’s iPhone without a hash value to authenticate and verify the integrity of the data, Mr. Green promptly requested the hash value and corresponding GrayKey supplemental files from the Commonwealth in order to conduct his analysis. After making this demand, and when the Commonwealth had to produce the hash verification data for Jen McCabe’s iPhone, remarkably, the Commonwealth also produced—for the first time, and over a year later on February 8, 2023—the Full File System Extraction of Jen McCabe’s iPhone (see “Notice of Discovery VIII,” attached). Unlike the initial purported “extraction” produced by Trooper Nicholas Guarino, this one contained Jen McCabe’s incriminating 2:27am Google search and all of the manual deletions of her communications, among other incriminating evidence, surrounding the murder of Officer John O’Keefe (see defense’s Rule 17 motion from April 12, 2023, attached). So, this begs the question: If Ian Whiffin knows the importance of hash verification in validating the authenticity of the data he’s working with in the first place, then why didn’t he take the same actions as defense expert Richard Green did to responsibly and reliably provide analysis in this case? If Whiffin ought to be deemed an expert, qualified to provide analysis and testimony at trial, then why did he abandon his industry’s standard methodology of hash verification in this case? Even Cellebrite knows this is a no-no! What say you? #KarenReadTrial #Cellebrite #DFIRshow more

Olivia
20,211 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr