Name: Was it close? Yes! Did refs get it wrong? No. Brandin Cooks DID NOT maintain possession all the way through. Both men had hands on the ball, but Cooks instantly loses grip once he hits the ground. Therefore, it’s a live ball until FULLY possessed or it touches grass.
Uploaded: 2026-01-18T19:32:51.000Z
Duration: PT15.500S
Channel: GOWIE
Description: GOWIE shorts video about Was it close? Yes! Did refs get it wrong? No. Brandin Cooks DID NOT maintain possession all the way through. Both men had hands on the ball, but Cooks instantly loses grip once he hits the ground. Therefore, it’s a live ball until FULLY possessed or it touches grass.

Was it close? Yes! Did refs get it wrong?... show more

GOWIE

71,875 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

At some point when reviewing plays, the league should... consider adding a speed threshold for anything involving the element of time. When you slow plays down to 1/100th the speed, it distorts what actually happened and makes it look like, in this case, Cooks possessed the ball for seconds prior to losing it. The game is not played in slow motion or frame by frame. For a catch: A) Secure control of the ball ✅ B) Two feet down in bounds ✅ C) After (a) and (b) have been fulfilled, clearly performs any act common to the game (e.g., extend the ball forward, take an additional step, tuck the ball away and turn upfield, or avoid or ward off an opponent), or he maintains control of the ball long enough to do so. C is where there is a judgement needed since A and B are clearly met. Now consider this note to the rule: If a player, who satisfied (a) and (b), but has not satisfied (c), contacts the ground and loses control of the ball, it is an incomplete pass if the ball hits the ground before he regains control, or if he regains control out of bounds. Because Cooks did lose control of the ball when he contacted the ground and the ball never contacted the ground, it was ruled an interception by Denver.show more