#johnokeefe
Someone requested the footage I captured while walking #KarenReadTrial witnesses and the family of #JohnOKeefe into court on 2/26/24 as they were booed by #KarenRead's pep-rally cheer squad. This was an important day, for those who understand the full context in a number of different ways, so I am re-sharing the clips here. Use with attribution permitted. #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #JusticeForJJ #DontFreeKarenRead #ConvictKarenRead #GodDecidesWhoShouldBeSorryForTheirSins #StopTryingToReadBetweenTheLinesOfMyHashTags
Grant Smith Ellis1,003,911 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr
Here’s an example of the apparent dishonesty of the MSP & DA Michael Morrissey’s office from day 1 in the #KarenRead case as they leaked knowably fabricated information to the local news claiming to have Ring cam surveillance footage of Karen Read striking & killing #JohnOKeefe with her car. They don’t and have never had ANY surveillance footage of John being killed or Karen hitting him. So that’s not a scriveners error. This reporting is from February 1, 2022 right around when Karen was arrested. DA Michael Morrissey, when offering evidence & commenting on the innocence of the involved or guilt of the defendant, in his video calling out the public (who are not DA’s) for “trying the case” on the internet/in the media, highlighted how statements made on the internet/by the public are not subject to the rules of perjury. It’s not like the news media can hold the DA’s office accountable to produce the evidence they claimed to have like in this news clip, as evidently Michael Morrissey is well aware of. Was this dishonest misrepresentation of the states evidence made in order to compensate for the lack of reliable probable cause to charge Karen? They had more probable cause on Brian Walshe on day 4 (the day they charged Karen) yet waited until day 17 to charge him. The fix was in rather quick it seems. Did you know in the Brian Walshe case, the same MSP crime lab had no problem turning around complex blood, DNA and other testing in that same timeframe? Despite having nearly 2yrs now, and it being long after the defendant, Karen, was arrested, the state still doesn’t have evidence test results. Additionally, in the apparent narrative push, the former CPD Chief Berkowitz personally contacted journalists at the time covering the story & requested they change or remove facts from their reporting, in effort to protect Brian Albert. There appeared to be a full scale effort by several individuals of authority across agencies to drive the narrative or use their positions of authority to influence the reporting of the facts to the public. The reporter, who Berkowitz contacted, likely very intimidated to be getting a call from the Chief of Police asking him to change factual info in his reporting, ultimately just removed his entire article altogether. If I’m not mistaken, I believe that journalist also discontinued his coverage of the case from there on out. If that’s not intimidation of the public or journalists, purely on the grounds of reporting public facts pertaining to the case, I don’t know what is. The arrest of the investigative journalist Aidan Kearney, by the very officers whose corruption he was exposing, further reinforces the concerted effort by LE in this case to intimidate journalists & members of the public from exercising their first amendment right. They did not like being scrutinized or those trying to hold them to account so instead they’ve tried to silence them with their charging authority. Before really diving into the court filings, I always found the claims that Karen was asking “could I have hit him?” at the scene to be curious, as though someone had asked Karen that or proposed that idea. I thought—why would one be asking this question? how could you not know? I was curious: if this was a coverup, how could someone particularly who’s distraught, be convinced of or questioning if they could’ve hit their significant other? The only thing I could come up with is if they’re told that they have you on camera in surveillance footage doing it… because… why would someone lie about that? It’d probably make any sane person start questioning reality. Was Karen Read being told this lie that morning/day? “You’re on Ring cam doing it! We have surveillance footage!” What does one even say to that? #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #FreeTurtleboy
Olivia584,287 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren
Boston police officer #JohnOKeefe was brutally beaten inside 34 Fairview Road and left to die outside on the lawn, in the cold, by the very people who testified under oath and called him a “friend” True Justice MUST BE SERVED. His killers and the law enforcement officers who covered it up and “pinned it on the girl” must be held accountable. It’s time to FREE KAREN READ ⚖️🩷 #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverUp #cantoncorruption #cantonma #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #DirtyCops #JusticeIsComing U.S. Attorney Massachusetts FBI Boston David Yannetti FBI Department of Defense 🇺🇸 U.S. Department of Justice Boston Police Dept. Massachusetts State Police Norfolk County Commission Aidan Kearney Sean McDonough, NOT the other guy! Vinnie Politan
JusticeForJohnOKeefe(FreeKarenRead)298,212 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren
Medical Examiner admits injuries could’ve been caused by a fight. #KarenRead’s Attorney Elizabeth Little is cross examining Medical Examiner Dr. Irini Scordi-Bello, who performed Officer #JohnOKeefe’s autopsy. She just admitted that most, if not all of his injuries could’ve been caused by blunt force trauma from a fight, getting punched in the face or beat up. The Medical Examiner also confirms that the bruising on the back of Officer O’Keefe’s hands/fists could be consistent with defensive wounds. She also confirms that she does not know what caused those scratches and wounds on John O’Keefe’s arm. That is precisely what “reasonable doubt” is. #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead #PoliceCorruption
Olivia280,985 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren
REASONABLE DOUBT REASON # 1: #KarenReadTrial If a medical examiner couldn’t even determine #JohnOKeefe’s death was a homicide, how can anyone on the jury? Fun Fact: Over 4 months after Karen Read was first arrested, on June 10, 2022, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office upgraded her charges from manslaughter to second degree murder despite the fact that their medical examiner couldn’t even determine if it was a homicide. At that time in June 2022, the DA’s Office said that while some of Officer O’Keefe’s injuries were apparently known, the full autopsy findings were purportedly “not complete”. Hmm… 🤔 Was it that they were “not complete”? Or was it that they were complete but didn’t fit your narrative? The DA’s Office further went on to state: "While the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner has accepted the case and will determine the cause and manner of death.” Despite apparently having neither a cause nor manner of death determination, apparently someone thought it was a good idea to charge Karen Read with not only manslaughter, but also second degree murder. Antithetical to the entire purpose of an investigation, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office and its Massachusetts State Police investigators don’t follow the evidence. Instead, they desperately twist and contort to try to make the evidence fit their narrative. Is this how we get to the truth? Is this why Michael Proctor was texting Trooper David DiCicco on April 28, 2022—in the lead up to the state grand jury to try to secure an indictment on upgraded charges—about how he wasn’t following the evidence in this case, but instead was trying to pressure the medical examiner to give him the determinations he wanted? The DA’s Office itself subsequently said “the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall” and didn’t have a cause or manner of death determination! 🤯 THAT’S REASONABLE DOUBT. Prosecutors have a duty to pursue justice. They have ethical obligations. Per ABA’s Standards for the Prosecution Function, Standard 3-4.6 says that: “A prosecutor should not seek an indictment unless the prosecutor reasonably believes the charges are supported by probable cause and that there will be admissible evidence sufficient to support the charges beyond reasonable doubt at trial.” This particularly applies to the Quality and Scope of Evidence Before a Grand Jury. Yet, despite having the definition of reasonable doubt, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office moved ahead with charges and upgraded charges against Karen anyway… …because, hey, according to them it could’ve been an “accidental fall”… …which would mean that Karen Read did not kill John O’Keefe, and she’s entirely innocent… …but who cares about the truth anyways? Apparently not this DA’s Office. It’s not like someone’s life isn’t hanging in the balance or anything. I guess this all explains why the Commonwealth wanted to conceal these inconvenient truths—that John’s manner of death could not be determined—evidence exculpatory to Karen Read. They sought to preclude this from the jury at trial (per their Motion In Limine to keep out John’s manner of death evidence)—because, forget about trying to get at the truth of the matter! This was never about justice. ——— VIDEO about reasonable doubt (attached) — Attorney David Howard gives one of my favorite analogy’s for reasonable doubt. Where was there not reasonable doubt in Karen Read’s case? I’m beyond eager to hear any of the jurors from her trial explain this. Anyone have any ideas? #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenRead #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead #PoliceCorruption
Olivia236,339 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren
Closing Statements are today in the Officer #JohnOkeefe trial. For so long, I have covered this case. I have become close with some of "Johnny's" friends and family. His family members and friends have been relentlessly disparaged and maligned because they know #KarenRead killed their loved one. They knew the wild conspiracy involving 10 people (including an ATF Agent, a dog, a 17 YO, and a fellow Boston LEO) and 9 agencies was contrived. All the witnesses inside the home where Officer O'Keefe was killed have been relentlessly attacked also. Their lives have been turned upside down with false accusations. There will be a verdict or a hung jury soon. Whatever is decided, I do know Read hit Officer O'Keefe with her Lexus that night. Her Lexus' tail light fragments were embedded in his shirt on top of the other overwhelming forensic evidence and the defendant's admissions. Hypothetical notions without considering all the evidence fail, IMV. Shame on the experts for not indicating they would need to reevaluate after becoming privy to exculpatory evidence they had not seen. They were paid a lot by the Defense and/or the government to stand-by their opinions. I have faith in juries, but there have been anomalies, including the OJ or Casey Anthony travesties. Certainly, I am saddened that there were police errors, that the lead detective said horrible things to his high school buddies about the case, and that Lally laid out the case in confusing fashion, but the facts remain. Praying for #JusticeforJohnOkeefe.
Jennifer Coffindaffer228,598 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren
![You may be wondering why one of the MSP Troopers who investigated Officer #JohnOKeefe’s murder is glaringly absent from the prosecutions witness list in the #KarenReadTrial. Is that because her testimony might be devastating for the claim that Jen McCabe didn’t make that google search at 2:27am? Yes, it’d appear so! (Part 1 of 2). Attorney Yannetti gave us some insight yesterday into why Massachusetts State Police Trooper Kathleen Prince is notably missing from the state’s witness list, but is on the defense’s witness list. Why would the state want to avoid calling the Trooper that interviewed star “witness” Jen McCabe on February 1, 2022? After all, unlike Lead Investigator Michael Proctor’s unrecorded & unsigned interview of Jen, Trooper Prince’s interview is far more detailed and thorough, and Prince also didn’t wait several months to write down & document her interview like Proctor did. Well, perhaps it’s because Trooper Prince’s is the only interview of Jen McCabe’s that ever even mentions anything about the Google search & from Jen McCabe herself. However, this is not the only lie seemingly told by Jen McCabe that Trooper Prince’s interview will expose. McCabe claims that: “Karen was told to sit in a car. Jen went over to Karen when she was in the car…Jen also stated that while her and Karen were in the back of the car, Karen was yelling and screaming one moment and then completely calm the next. Jen said that they prayed the "Our Father" together. Karen then immediately yelled at Jen two times to Google, "How long do you have to be left outside to die from hypothermia?" That’s a big problem for McCabe, which the state probably later realized, hence why they took the creative liberty to completely distort & change Jen’s statements in their later court filings, particularly about how the Google search came about. Why? Jen probably didn’t realize when making this statement to Trooper Prince, who she’s not close friends with unlike Michael Proctor, that the Police cars have dash-cams in them. Thus, if this conversation ever actually happened, like Jen claims, then it’d all be recorded on dash-cam footage. It’s convenient how Jen’s story about when #KarenRead purportedly asked her to Google such a thing also happened inside a car where nobody else would be able to hear it to corroborate Jen’s story. But again, in this early stage of the investigation, Jen likely was unaware that her entire claim would be debunked by the dash-cams that would’ve captured it as proof. So to her, being inside a car was the perfect explanation for why no one else at the scene heard Karen ask that. Because Karen never actually asked it! THIS is Jen McCabe framing Karen Read. But beyond this, we also now have confirmation from Officer Mullaney that Karen & Jen never got into a car together while he was there. So this entire story seems to have been fabricated altogether. In a desperate attempt to remedy this critical fact issue, the state just completely fabricated new testimony in its documents, stating that immediately upon finding John’s body, ‘The defendant then yelled at Ms. McCabe twice to Google, "How long do you have to be left outside to die from hypothermia?’, or something to that effect.” What else was fabricated? The claim that Jen McCabe was taking any measures to try to help save Officer O’Keefe’s life, unlike Read who was. In her interview with Prince, Jen claims: “[She] observed Karen to have blood on her hands and face. Karen was holding her hands up and was saying, ‘I have my period.’ Jen said that she told Karen that was not her blood that it was John's blood from them doing CPR.” Jen McCabe’s trying to win favor for trying to help save John’s life—something she did not do—when she says that the blood on Karen’s face “was John’s blood from them doing CPR”. Except “they” didn’t do CPR. Only Karen Read did CPR as confirmed by yesterday’s 3 state’s first responder witnesses who confirmed as such. #FreeKarenRead](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1785892041332789759/amplify_video_thumb/1785891962073026560/img/eHUMp_K_9vqSWTtf.jpg)
You may be wondering why one of the MSP Troopers who investigated Officer #JohnOKeefe’s murder is glaringly absent from the prosecutions witness list in the #KarenReadTrial. Is that because her testimony might be devastating for the claim that Jen McCabe didn’t make that google search at 2:27am? Yes, it’d appear so! (Part 1 of 2). Attorney Yannetti gave us some insight yesterday into why Massachusetts State Police Trooper Kathleen Prince is notably missing from the state’s witness list, but is on the defense’s witness list. Why would the state want to avoid calling the Trooper that interviewed star “witness” Jen McCabe on February 1, 2022? After all, unlike Lead Investigator Michael Proctor’s unrecorded & unsigned interview of Jen, Trooper Prince’s interview is far more detailed and thorough, and Prince also didn’t wait several months to write down & document her interview like Proctor did. Well, perhaps it’s because Trooper Prince’s is the only interview of Jen McCabe’s that ever even mentions anything about the Google search & from Jen McCabe herself. However, this is not the only lie seemingly told by Jen McCabe that Trooper Prince’s interview will expose. McCabe claims that: “Karen was told to sit in a car. Jen went over to Karen when she was in the car…Jen also stated that while her and Karen were in the back of the car, Karen was yelling and screaming one moment and then completely calm the next. Jen said that they prayed the "Our Father" together. Karen then immediately yelled at Jen two times to Google, "How long do you have to be left outside to die from hypothermia?" That’s a big problem for McCabe, which the state probably later realized, hence why they took the creative liberty to completely distort & change Jen’s statements in their later court filings, particularly about how the Google search came about. Why? Jen probably didn’t realize when making this statement to Trooper Prince, who she’s not close friends with unlike Michael Proctor, that the Police cars have dash-cams in them. Thus, if this conversation ever actually happened, like Jen claims, then it’d all be recorded on dash-cam footage. It’s convenient how Jen’s story about when #KarenRead purportedly asked her to Google such a thing also happened inside a car where nobody else would be able to hear it to corroborate Jen’s story. But again, in this early stage of the investigation, Jen likely was unaware that her entire claim would be debunked by the dash-cams that would’ve captured it as proof. So to her, being inside a car was the perfect explanation for why no one else at the scene heard Karen ask that. Because Karen never actually asked it! THIS is Jen McCabe framing Karen Read. But beyond this, we also now have confirmation from Officer Mullaney that Karen & Jen never got into a car together while he was there. So this entire story seems to have been fabricated altogether. In a desperate attempt to remedy this critical fact issue, the state just completely fabricated new testimony in its documents, stating that immediately upon finding John’s body, ‘The defendant then yelled at Ms. McCabe twice to Google, "How long do you have to be left outside to die from hypothermia?’, or something to that effect.” What else was fabricated? The claim that Jen McCabe was taking any measures to try to help save Officer O’Keefe’s life, unlike Read who was. In her interview with Prince, Jen claims: “[She] observed Karen to have blood on her hands and face. Karen was holding her hands up and was saying, ‘I have my period.’ Jen said that she told Karen that was not her blood that it was John's blood from them doing CPR.” Jen McCabe’s trying to win favor for trying to help save John’s life—something she did not do—when she says that the blood on Karen’s face “was John’s blood from them doing CPR”. Except “they” didn’t do CPR. Only Karen Read did CPR as confirmed by yesterday’s 3 state’s first responder witnesses who confirmed as such. #FreeKarenRead
Olivia193,892 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren
Adam Deitch for District Attorney sat down with Stoughton Politics for an interview… here’s what he had to say about the #KarenRead case and the investigations into the deaths of officer #johnokeefe and #sandrabirchmore 👏🏼 Vote Adam Deitch for Norfolk County DA
Unfiltered Thoughts (Justice For John O’Keefe)26,819 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten