Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

100% css 0% javascript Pretty cool that you can run animations like this now off the main thread, was always a worry implementing a scroll animation knowing some users might see "jank" Safari and Firefox are sleeping far too long, scroll driven animations are awesome

Dev Ed

71,101 subscribers

88,209 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Bildung Wissenschaft & Technologie Kunst

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Scroll-triggered animations are coming to Chrome early next year (and we've been really excited about this one for a bit!) 🥳 Unlike scroll-driven animations (already in Chrome & Safari), this API introduces "timeline-trigger" and "animation-trigger" to start an animation within a specific range, rather than relying on the scroller completion *as* the animation timeline. I got nerd-sniped and wanted to try it out so I built this shape morphing demo to show how you can apply multiple animations to the same element over with different triggers. PRETTY COOL IMO! Bramus has a post with more info ⬇️

Scroll-triggered animations are coming to Chrome early next year (and we've been really excited about this one for a bit!) 🥳 Unlike scroll-driven animations (already in Chrome & Safari), this API introduces "timeline-trigger" and "animation-trigger" to start an animation within a specific range, rather than relying on the scroller completion as the animation timeline. I got nerd-sniped and wanted to try it out so I built this shape morphing demo to show how you can apply multiple animations to the same element over with different triggers. PRETTY COOL IMO! Bramus has a post with more info ⬇️

Una 🇺🇦

38,727 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🤩 I just learned a super cool trick! Do you know how sometimes you want to record while you scroll on a website, like for a demo or something... But by using the mouse to scroll it turns out to be kinda janky and it doesn't look very good? No? Just me? 🤭 Well, I found out that if you paste this code in the console of your browser: ` setInterval(() => window.scrollBy(0, 4), 16); ` You can make the browser automatically scroll for you! And it looks super cool in the recording! 😎

🤩 I just learned a super cool trick! Do you know how sometimes you want to record while you scroll on a website, like for a demo or something... But by using the mouse to scroll it turns out to be kinda janky and it doesn't look very good? No? Just me? 🤭 Well, I found out that if you paste this code in the console of your browser: ` setInterval(() => window.scrollBy(0, 4), 16); ` You can make the browser automatically scroll for you! And it looks super cool in the recording! 😎

Florin Pop 👨🏻‍💻

29,839 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

you can create a sticky navbar that morphs when you scroll with pure CSS, no JS or animation libraries required 𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚛 { 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚛-𝚝𝚢𝚙𝚎: 𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚘𝚕𝚕-𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚎; 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗: 𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚔𝚢; 𝚝𝚘𝚙: 𝟶; } @𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚛 𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚘𝚕𝚕-𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚎(𝚜𝚝𝚞𝚌𝚔: 𝚝𝚘𝚙) { .𝚗𝚊𝚟-𝚋𝚊𝚛 { 𝚖𝚊𝚡-𝚠𝚒𝚍𝚝𝚑: 𝟻𝟼𝚛𝚎𝚖; 𝚋𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚎𝚛-𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚞𝚜: 𝟶.𝟽𝟻𝚛𝚎𝚖; 𝚋𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚐𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚍: 𝚛𝚐𝚋(𝟸𝟻𝟻 𝟸𝟻𝟻 𝟸𝟻𝟻 / 𝟶.𝟿𝟸); } } the browser now knows when a sticky element is stuck, all triggered by one container query available only in chromium browsers only, no firefox or safari which is a shame

you can create a sticky navbar that morphs when you scroll with pure CSS, no JS or animation libraries required 𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚛 { 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚛-𝚝𝚢𝚙𝚎: 𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚘𝚕𝚕-𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚎; 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗: 𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚔𝚢; 𝚝𝚘𝚙: 𝟶; } @𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚛 𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚘𝚕𝚕-𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚎(𝚜𝚝𝚞𝚌𝚔: 𝚝𝚘𝚙) { .𝚗𝚊𝚟-𝚋𝚊𝚛 { 𝚖𝚊𝚡-𝚠𝚒𝚍𝚝𝚑: 𝟻𝟼𝚛𝚎𝚖; 𝚋𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚎𝚛-𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚞𝚜: 𝟶.𝟽𝟻𝚛𝚎𝚖; 𝚋𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚐𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚍: 𝚛𝚐𝚋(𝟸𝟻𝟻 𝟸𝟻𝟻 𝟸𝟻𝟻 / 𝟶.𝟿𝟸); } } the browser now knows when a sticky element is stuck, all triggered by one container query available only in chromium browsers only, no firefox or safari which is a shame

Manu Arora

112,131 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Shine animations in CSS are actually simple to make. .shine-container { position: relative; overflow: hidden; } .shine-container::after { content: ""; position: absolute; inset: 0; transform: translateX(-100%); background: linear-gradient( 90deg, transparent, rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.25), transparent ); animation: shine 1.5s infinite; } KEYframe Galaxy Studios shine { 100% { transform: translateX(100%); } } Now you have a reusable shine effect, that you can reuse in any container! If you found this useful, follow for more. ❤️

Shine animations in CSS are actually simple to make. .shine-container { position: relative; overflow: hidden; } .shine-container::after { content: ""; position: absolute; inset: 0; transform: translateX(-100%); background: linear-gradient( 90deg, transparent, rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.25), transparent ); animation: shine 1.5s infinite; } KEYframe Galaxy Studios shine { 100% { transform: translateX(100%); } } Now you have a reusable shine effect, that you can reuse in any container! If you found this useful, follow for more. ❤️

Ali

10,804 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Design Engineering Tip: Most UI animations are built for a single uninterrupted transition. Real users might reverse direction before the animation finishes. Use a spring transition that preserves the element’s current velocity instead of restarting from zero. This keeps rapid hover, press, and state changes smooth and responsive. transition={{ type: "spring", stiffness: 520, damping: 38, }}

Design Engineering Tip: Most UI animations are built for a single uninterrupted transition. Real users might reverse direction before the animation finishes. Use a spring transition that preserves the element’s current velocity instead of restarting from zero. This keeps rapid hover, press, and state changes smooth and responsive. transition={{ type: "spring", stiffness: 520, damping: 38, }}

Gabriel

64,022 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

THIS SITE COST AROUND $12 IN CREDITS TO BUILD. STUDIOS QUOTE $35,000 FOR THE SAME THING. What's on screen isn't a basic landing page. It's a fully animated, scroll-driven site, generated end to end in one agentic session with Claude Code + Higgsfield. What's actually on the page: → Cinematic motion clips pulled from 30+ generative models → Scroll animations written automatically - zero hand-coded keyframes → 6 cinematic effects baked in with no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing Scroll the demo and one question won't go away: did Claude really assemble all of this in a single pass? For boutique studios billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. What it normally takes: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs between them → 6 systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis smooth-scroll, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It's what justified the invoice. Here's the part studios and their clients won't enjoy hearing. The price gap: → Boutique agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Industry average project: ~$5,280 → Delivery cost: a Claude subscription + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → Timeline: weeks of production → a single session One operator can now run all six systems in one pass and ship a working site - without touching a frame extractor or writing a CSS keyframe by hand. Full breakdown of how it's built in the article below. Save it & read today 👇

THIS SITE COST AROUND $12 IN CREDITS TO BUILD. STUDIOS QUOTE $35,000 FOR THE SAME THING. What's on screen isn't a basic landing page. It's a fully animated, scroll-driven site, generated end to end in one agentic session with Claude Code + Higgsfield. What's actually on the page: → Cinematic motion clips pulled from 30+ generative models → Scroll animations written automatically - zero hand-coded keyframes → 6 cinematic effects baked in with no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing Scroll the demo and one question won't go away: did Claude really assemble all of this in a single pass? For boutique studios billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. What it normally takes: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs between them → 6 systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis smooth-scroll, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It's what justified the invoice. Here's the part studios and their clients won't enjoy hearing. The price gap: → Boutique agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Industry average project: ~$5,280 → Delivery cost: a Claude subscription + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → Timeline: weeks of production → a single session One operator can now run all six systems in one pass and ship a working site - without touching a frame extractor or writing a CSS keyframe by hand. Full breakdown of how it's built in the article below. Save it & read today 👇

ZEUS⚡️

477,187 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I got sick near the end of making this animation can you tell? lol That aside, though, I think action #animations are becoming my bread and butter. It's just a lot of fun watching your characters come to life in this way y'know?

I got sick near the end of making this animation can you tell? lol That aside, though, I think action #animations are becoming my bread and butter. It's just a lot of fun watching your characters come to life in this way y'know?

ZeSketches

31,930 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Known this for a while but now people are finding out so might aswell tweet, you can run up all mountains and edges if you swing the chainsaw around 50 times and drop it and pick it back up 5 times, Like and RT so your friends can see

Known this for a while but now people are finding out so might aswell tweet, you can run up all mountains and edges if you swing the chainsaw around 50 times and drop it and pick it back up 5 times, Like and RT so your friends can see

trip

245,073 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

STUDIOS QUOTE $35,000 FOR THIS WEBSITE. A FULLY ANIMATED, SCROLL-DRIVEN BUILD - CINEMATIC CLIPS, FILM GRAIN, GLASS CARDS - SHIPPED IN ONE SESSION FOR $12. Scroll it and one question won't leave: did an AI really assemble all of this in a single pass? For studios quoting $35,000 and billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. Here's what the page actually runs: → Motion clips generated from 30+ models - not stock, not hand-shot → Scroll animations written automatically - zero hand-coded keyframes → Six cinematic effects baked in with no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing What that used to require: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs → Six systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It justified the invoice. It just collapsed into Claude Code + Higgsfield running in one pass. The gap nobody wants to say out loud: → Agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Real cost now: a Claude sub + a few dollars of credits → Timeline: weeks → a single session Follow me + reply "web-site" to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

STUDIOS QUOTE $35,000 FOR THIS WEBSITE. A FULLY ANIMATED, SCROLL-DRIVEN BUILD - CINEMATIC CLIPS, FILM GRAIN, GLASS CARDS - SHIPPED IN ONE SESSION FOR $12. Scroll it and one question won't leave: did an AI really assemble all of this in a single pass? For studios quoting $35,000 and billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. Here's what the page actually runs: → Motion clips generated from 30+ models - not stock, not hand-shot → Scroll animations written automatically - zero hand-coded keyframes → Six cinematic effects baked in with no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing What that used to require: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs → Six systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It justified the invoice. It just collapsed into Claude Code + Higgsfield running in one pass. The gap nobody wants to say out loud: → Agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Real cost now: a Claude sub + a few dollars of credits → Timeline: weeks → a single session Follow me + reply "web-site" to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

ZEUS⚡️

56,569 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

Seeing this in the subway station was so cool! 🤩but what was even more awesome was that we just happened to see this little boy and his dad copying my pose 🥺 This is a perfect example that YOU CAN DO IT TOO 🫵🏼 This is why I do what I do, and it’s so a special!☺️

Seeing this in the subway station was so cool! 🤩but what was even more awesome was that we just happened to see this little boy and his dad copying my pose 🥺 This is a perfect example that YOU CAN DO IT TOO 🫵🏼 This is why I do what I do, and it’s so a special!☺️

Maggie Mac Neil OLY, MSc

209,137 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

A SOLO CREATOR JUST SHIPPED A $35,000-TIER ANIMATED SITE IN ONE WEEKEND - WITH CLAUDE CODE + HIGGSFIELD, FOR THE COST OF A SUBSCRIPTION. What you're looking at isn't a template. It's a fully animated, scroll-driven site, generated end to end in a single agentic session. What's actually on the page: → Cinematic motion clips pulled from 30+ generative models → Scroll animations written automatically - not a single hand-coded keyframe → 6 cinematic effects baked in with zero config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing Scroll the demo and one question keeps surfacing: a person didn't build this by hand… did they? For studios billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. What this normally takes: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs between all three → 6 systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis smooth-scroll, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It's what justified the invoice. Here's the part the agency won't put in its pitch deck. The price gap: → Boutique agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Industry average project: ~$5,280 → Your cost: a Claude subscription + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → Timeline: weeks of production → one session One operator now runs all six systems in a single pass and ships a working site - without opening a frame extractor or writing one CSS keyframe. Full breakdown of how it's built in the article below. Save it & read today 👇

A SOLO CREATOR JUST SHIPPED A $35,000-TIER ANIMATED SITE IN ONE WEEKEND - WITH CLAUDE CODE + HIGGSFIELD, FOR THE COST OF A SUBSCRIPTION. What you're looking at isn't a template. It's a fully animated, scroll-driven site, generated end to end in a single agentic session. What's actually on the page: → Cinematic motion clips pulled from 30+ generative models → Scroll animations written automatically - not a single hand-coded keyframe → 6 cinematic effects baked in with zero config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing Scroll the demo and one question keeps surfacing: a person didn't build this by hand… did they? For studios billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. What this normally takes: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs between all three → 6 systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis smooth-scroll, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It's what justified the invoice. Here's the part the agency won't put in its pitch deck. The price gap: → Boutique agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Industry average project: ~$5,280 → Your cost: a Claude subscription + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → Timeline: weeks of production → one session One operator now runs all six systems in a single pass and ships a working site - without opening a frame extractor or writing one CSS keyframe. Full breakdown of how it's built in the article below. Save it & read today 👇

ZEUS⚡️

21,598 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

THIS GUY JUST REBUILT A $35,000 ANIMATED SITE FOR $12. IF YOU RUN A WEB STUDIO, YOU SHOULD PROBABLY KEEP SCROLLING. Every agency billing $100-149/hr is selling you five departments wearing one invoice. Here’s each one - collapsed into a single agentic session. LAYER 1 - THE CONCEPT ROOM (Claude) Reads the brief, pulls references, and scripts the scroll: what the visitor feels at second 3, second 15, second 40. → Used to be a strategist and a wall of mood boards. Now it’s a conversation. LAYER 2 - THE MOTION STUDIO (Higgsfield) Cinematic clips from 30+ generative models - hero shots, transitions, ambient loops - all matched to the story from Layer 1. → Used to be a motion artist on retainer. Now it’s a prompt. LAYER 3 - THE DEV TEAM (Claude Code) Scaffolds the site, writes the GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines and Lenis smooth-scroll, extracts frames, optimizes every asset. → A full scroll-driven build with zero hand-coded keyframes. LAYER 4 - THE DESIGN DEPT (baked-in cinematic layer) Six effects, zero config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. → The polish that justified the invoice - now it ships by default. LAYER 5 - THE QA PASS (Claude) Checks load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands - then rewrites whatever doesn’t. → Used to be a client call and a revision cycle. Now it’s one more turn in the same session. Five departments. One operator. One pass. A strategist, a motion artist, a developer, a designer, and a QA lead - weeks of handoffs - now run in a single session. For a Claude subscription and a few dollars of Higgsfield credits. The studio was never selling talent. It was selling overhead. And the overhead just became five layers. Follow me, reply “website” to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

THIS GUY JUST REBUILT A $35,000 ANIMATED SITE FOR $12. IF YOU RUN A WEB STUDIO, YOU SHOULD PROBABLY KEEP SCROLLING. Every agency billing $100-149/hr is selling you five departments wearing one invoice. Here’s each one - collapsed into a single agentic session. LAYER 1 - THE CONCEPT ROOM (Claude) Reads the brief, pulls references, and scripts the scroll: what the visitor feels at second 3, second 15, second 40. → Used to be a strategist and a wall of mood boards. Now it’s a conversation. LAYER 2 - THE MOTION STUDIO (Higgsfield) Cinematic clips from 30+ generative models - hero shots, transitions, ambient loops - all matched to the story from Layer 1. → Used to be a motion artist on retainer. Now it’s a prompt. LAYER 3 - THE DEV TEAM (Claude Code) Scaffolds the site, writes the GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines and Lenis smooth-scroll, extracts frames, optimizes every asset. → A full scroll-driven build with zero hand-coded keyframes. LAYER 4 - THE DESIGN DEPT (baked-in cinematic layer) Six effects, zero config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. → The polish that justified the invoice - now it ships by default. LAYER 5 - THE QA PASS (Claude) Checks load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands - then rewrites whatever doesn’t. → Used to be a client call and a revision cycle. Now it’s one more turn in the same session. Five departments. One operator. One pass. A strategist, a motion artist, a developer, a designer, and a QA lead - weeks of handoffs - now run in a single session. For a Claude subscription and a few dollars of Higgsfield credits. The studio was never selling talent. It was selling overhead. And the overhead just became five layers. Follow me, reply “website” to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

ZEUS⚡️

134,166 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

I originally wrote this song about some guy i was obsessed with. Now it’s a love letter to my fans. Thank you for loving me then and loving me now, yall are the love of my life ❤️ Your love is my drug lyric video out now. Animations by OG icon Lizzi Akana

I originally wrote this song about some guy i was obsessed with. Now it’s a love letter to my fans. Thank you for loving me then and loving me now, yall are the love of my life ❤️ Your love is my drug lyric video out now. Animations by OG icon Lizzi Akana

kesha

197,155 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Public version here! 😎 Generate scroll-stopping ads in 3 clicks! ✨ And you can try it for FREE! 👉 Link in first comment (Obviously, there are usage limits, else I'll go broke in one day 😄) It's pretty basic for now, and it's optimised for SaaS/Infoproducts, but I'll improve it with feedback! This is just a fun side-project for now, but we'll see where it goes!

Public version here! 😎 Generate scroll-stopping ads in 3 clicks! ✨ And you can try it for FREE! 👉 Link in first comment (Obviously, there are usage limits, else I'll go broke in one day 😄) It's pretty basic for now, and it's optimised for SaaS/Infoproducts, but I'll improve it with feedback! This is just a fun side-project for now, but we'll see where it goes!

Nico

123,354 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD JUST KILLED THE $35,000 WEB AGENCY. The same animated website that used to cost between $6,000 and $35,000 can now be built in a single session for around $12 in AI credits. Claude Code handles the website. Higgsfield creates the visuals. Together, they can build a complete scroll-driven website from a simple prompt. Claude writes the layout, GSAP ScrollTrigger animations, Lenis smooth scrolling, responsive pages, and checks everything before you ship. Higgsfield generates the hero videos, cinematic transitions, ambient loops, thumbnails, and every visual asset you need. By the end of one session, you have a fully animated website with cinematic motion, smooth scrolling, optimized assets, responsive layouts, and polished visual effects like film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, and color tints. Getting started only takes a few minutes. Add Higgsfield as an MCP server inside Claude Code, complete the OAuth login once, and Claude can generate and pull videos directly into your project without manually exporting anything. The prompts are simple. Give Claude your project brief and ask it to script the entire scroll experience. Tell it to generate a hero video and supporting clips for every section. Ask it to add the finishing touches like film grain, particles, glass cards, and scroll pacing. Then let it review the site, improve loading speed, fix mobile layouts, and rewrite anything that doesn’t work. This replaces work that usually looks like this: A $6,000-$35,000 web agency. An $800-$2,000 motion designer. A $2,000-$10,000 front-end developer. And weeks of back-and-forth before launch. Now it’s Fable 5, Higgsfield, a subscription, a few dollars in AI credits, and one session. The pipeline used to be the advantage. Now it’s just a prompt. Full breakdown in the article below.

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD JUST KILLED THE $35,000 WEB AGENCY. The same animated website that used to cost between $6,000 and $35,000 can now be built in a single session for around $12 in AI credits. Claude Code handles the website. Higgsfield creates the visuals. Together, they can build a complete scroll-driven website from a simple prompt. Claude writes the layout, GSAP ScrollTrigger animations, Lenis smooth scrolling, responsive pages, and checks everything before you ship. Higgsfield generates the hero videos, cinematic transitions, ambient loops, thumbnails, and every visual asset you need. By the end of one session, you have a fully animated website with cinematic motion, smooth scrolling, optimized assets, responsive layouts, and polished visual effects like film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, and color tints. Getting started only takes a few minutes. Add Higgsfield as an MCP server inside Claude Code, complete the OAuth login once, and Claude can generate and pull videos directly into your project without manually exporting anything. The prompts are simple. Give Claude your project brief and ask it to script the entire scroll experience. Tell it to generate a hero video and supporting clips for every section. Ask it to add the finishing touches like film grain, particles, glass cards, and scroll pacing. Then let it review the site, improve loading speed, fix mobile layouts, and rewrite anything that doesn’t work. This replaces work that usually looks like this: A $6,000-$35,000 web agency. An $800-$2,000 motion designer. A $2,000-$10,000 front-end developer. And weeks of back-and-forth before launch. Now it’s Fable 5, Higgsfield, a subscription, a few dollars in AI credits, and one session. The pipeline used to be the advantage. Now it’s just a prompt. Full breakdown in the article below.

MIKE

138,059 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

People say running is bad and that it makes you look old and wastes away your muscle People are dumb That only happens if you run for to long at to high of a heart rate If you run at 130-140 beats per minute with a smile on your face it’s actually some of the best therapy there is If you are running and you can’t smile and it looks like you are in agony and can’t hold a pleasant conversation you are doing it wrong and that’s what will cause you to look old and frail This is called “the sweet spot” folks and it can be used for way more than just running

People say running is bad and that it makes you look old and wastes away your muscle People are dumb That only happens if you run for to long at to high of a heart rate If you run at 130-140 beats per minute with a smile on your face it’s actually some of the best therapy there is If you are running and you can’t smile and it looks like you are in agony and can’t hold a pleasant conversation you are doing it wrong and that’s what will cause you to look old and frail This is called “the sweet spot” folks and it can be used for way more than just running

Thor Torrens

19,510 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

little monsters whining that the tour is “just like her old previous shows” can respectfully f*ck off. this is the kind of show you experience once in a lifetime. a theatrical, emotional and art driven spectacle and we are lucky lady gaga is giving it her absolute best.

little monsters whining that the tour is “just like her old previous shows” can respectfully f*ck off. this is the kind of show you experience once in a lifetime. a theatrical, emotional and art driven spectacle and we are lucky lady gaga is giving it her absolute best.

Ved

55,921 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

One of the most common mistakes manufacturers make is relying on engineering logic to shape user behavior, while ignoring how users actually feel. Engineers often believe that as long as a feature exists, moves, or looks different, users will appreciate it. Users, however, care about something much simpler: whether the experience feels natural, refined, and intuitive. Great user experience is never created by stacking options. It is created by coherence and emotional consistency. Samsung’s recent update to Lock Star is a clear example. The new version introduces unlock animations that appear to add playfulness, yet the real experience feels disappointing. Many of these animations come across as childish, low level, poorly connected, and mechanically rigid. They feel closer to children’s UI effects than something designed for Samsung’s broad premium user base. The issue is not the presence of animations themselves. The problem lies in the mindset behind them. These effects are clearly driven by implementation logic rather than user perception. The assumption seems to be that adding visual flair automatically creates delight, while ignoring rhythm, emotional tone, and aesthetic maturity. This reflects a long standing pattern in Samsung’s software design. Random stickers, cartoon like emojis, and decorative elements often appear without a cohesive design language. There is a belief that younger users are attracted to these visuals, yet for Gen Z, such elements often feel outdated, immature, and disconnected from a premium identity. Strong product design allows user experience to constrain engineering decisions. When engineering begins to entertain itself, users quietly begin to disengage. Let's see how far apart Samsung and Xiaomi are.

One of the most common mistakes manufacturers make is relying on engineering logic to shape user behavior, while ignoring how users actually feel. Engineers often believe that as long as a feature exists, moves, or looks different, users will appreciate it. Users, however, care about something much simpler: whether the experience feels natural, refined, and intuitive. Great user experience is never created by stacking options. It is created by coherence and emotional consistency. Samsung’s recent update to Lock Star is a clear example. The new version introduces unlock animations that appear to add playfulness, yet the real experience feels disappointing. Many of these animations come across as childish, low level, poorly connected, and mechanically rigid. They feel closer to children’s UI effects than something designed for Samsung’s broad premium user base. The issue is not the presence of animations themselves. The problem lies in the mindset behind them. These effects are clearly driven by implementation logic rather than user perception. The assumption seems to be that adding visual flair automatically creates delight, while ignoring rhythm, emotional tone, and aesthetic maturity. This reflects a long standing pattern in Samsung’s software design. Random stickers, cartoon like emojis, and decorative elements often appear without a cohesive design language. There is a belief that younger users are attracted to these visuals, yet for Gen Z, such elements often feel outdated, immature, and disconnected from a premium identity. Strong product design allows user experience to constrain engineering decisions. When engineering begins to entertain itself, users quietly begin to disengage. Let's see how far apart Samsung and Xiaomi are.

Ice Universe

59,669 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten