正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🔥 1990: When students bu₹ned themselves because a PM sold their future for votes VP Singh forced Mandal overnight. 27% extra quota. Total reservation near 50%. No debate. Just pure caste arithmetic to save his government. Students hit the streets. Rajiv Goswami set himself on fire. Dozens more followed.... show more

RHA Reforms

2,726 subscribers

32,737 次观看 • 23 天前 •via X (Twitter)

教育新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

ABHIJEET ASKS IF BJP HAS LOST ITS LAST BIT OF HUMANITY 🚨 REPORTER: Government says NEET is over and the exam was conducted successfully. ABHIJEET 🔥: Go say that to the families whose children died by suicide. We are not asking for votes or a Rajya Sabha seat. We are asking for justice. REPORTER: Government says Air Force was used to secure the exam. ABHIJEET 🎯: Then make Rajnath Singh education minister. After NEET, more papers leaked in Maharashtra, Rajasthan and UGC-NET. Where is the Air Force there? REPORTER: What do you want the government to do now? ABHIJEET 🛑: Look at Sonam Wangchuk. Fifteen days hungry, still no one comes to talk. Even the British spoke to Gandhi during fasts. This government will not even speak to its own students.

ABHIJEET ASKS IF BJP HAS LOST ITS LAST BIT OF HUMANITY 🚨 REPORTER: Government says NEET is over and the exam was conducted successfully. ABHIJEET 🔥: Go say that to the families whose children died by suicide. We are not asking for votes or a Rajya Sabha seat. We are asking for justice. REPORTER: Government says Air Force was used to secure the exam. ABHIJEET 🎯: Then make Rajnath Singh education minister. After NEET, more papers leaked in Maharashtra, Rajasthan and UGC-NET. Where is the Air Force there? REPORTER: What do you want the government to do now? ABHIJEET 🛑: Look at Sonam Wangchuk. Fifteen days hungry, still no one comes to talk. Even the British spoke to Gandhi during fasts. This government will not even speak to its own students.

Mr Sharma

307,034 次观看 • 1 个月前

Statement by WAYNE OLIVEIRA Voc Tech School Committee Member on the Massachusetts Voc-Tech Admissions Lottery The implementation of a lottery-based admissions system for Massachusetts vocational-technical schools in 2026 has left many students and families deeply disappointed and disillusioned. While the intention behind this shift—to promote equity and expand access—may be well-meaning, the reality is that it has replaced a system based on effort, interest, and demonstrated commitment with one largely dependent on chance and luck. For years, students worked hard to earn their place in these highly sought-after programs by maintaining strong attendance, showing dedication, and actively preparing for a future in the trades. Today, many of those same students find themselves waitlisted or denied admission, not because they lacked motivation or ability, but simply because their name was not drawn. Families have described this transition as a “drastic jump from one extreme to the other,” moving away from merit entirely toward random choice. At the same time, the core issue remains unresolved: there are far more qualified applicants than available seats. Tens of thousands of students apply for just over ten thousand openings each year, meaning that regardless of the admissions method, many will be left out. Instead of addressing this shortage through expansion and investment, the state has chosen to redistribute opportunity through a system that many perceive as arbitrary and discouraging. This approach risks sending a troubling message to students—that hard work, consistency, and passion may not matter when pursuing certain educational paths. It also raises concerns about long-term impacts on student motivation and the development of a skilled workforce. A fair system should strive for both equity and recognition of effort. Massachusetts must re-evaluate this policy and consider solutions that balance opportunity with accountability—while also addressing the fundamental issue of limited access by expanding vocational education capacity. Students deserve more than a lottery. They deserve a system that reflects both fairness and the value of their hard work. If you feel this same way you need to make some noise! Reach out to the State Department of Education and your State Senator and Representative. Tell them this broken system needs to be fixed immediately.

Statement by WAYNE OLIVEIRA Voc Tech School Committee Member on the Massachusetts Voc-Tech Admissions Lottery The implementation of a lottery-based admissions system for Massachusetts vocational-technical schools in 2026 has left many students and families deeply disappointed and disillusioned. While the intention behind this shift—to promote equity and expand access—may be well-meaning, the reality is that it has replaced a system based on effort, interest, and demonstrated commitment with one largely dependent on chance and luck. For years, students worked hard to earn their place in these highly sought-after programs by maintaining strong attendance, showing dedication, and actively preparing for a future in the trades. Today, many of those same students find themselves waitlisted or denied admission, not because they lacked motivation or ability, but simply because their name was not drawn. Families have described this transition as a “drastic jump from one extreme to the other,” moving away from merit entirely toward random choice. At the same time, the core issue remains unresolved: there are far more qualified applicants than available seats. Tens of thousands of students apply for just over ten thousand openings each year, meaning that regardless of the admissions method, many will be left out. Instead of addressing this shortage through expansion and investment, the state has chosen to redistribute opportunity through a system that many perceive as arbitrary and discouraging. This approach risks sending a troubling message to students—that hard work, consistency, and passion may not matter when pursuing certain educational paths. It also raises concerns about long-term impacts on student motivation and the development of a skilled workforce. A fair system should strive for both equity and recognition of effort. Massachusetts must re-evaluate this policy and consider solutions that balance opportunity with accountability—while also addressing the fundamental issue of limited access by expanding vocational education capacity. Students deserve more than a lottery. They deserve a system that reflects both fairness and the value of their hard work. If you feel this same way you need to make some noise! Reach out to the State Department of Education and your State Senator and Representative. Tell them this broken system needs to be fixed immediately.

Fall River Reporter

27,042 次观看 • 4 个月前

I was in disbelief while watching Muhammad Yunus’s speech to the business community on the 12th of September. That speech had zero substance, was not at all rooted in reality — and was self-serving through and through. The news of factory closures for labour unrest, production being hampered for days on end, vandalism of factories and businesses, work orders and investments being diverted from Bangladesh and the overall dicey law and order situation — are truly alarming developments. And I assume the gathering of the business community was to send out a strong message from the head of the government that such anarchy, mob justice, lawlessness and belligerence will not be tolerated any further. Let alone a strong message he didn’t even touch upon this issue. In his address to the nation on the 8th of September, he touched upon this issue barely in passing — when it should have been one of the highlights of his speech. You’d have even missed it were you not listening in to the speech with rapt attention. One way to construe his disinterest in the issue is that he tacitly approves of this newfound belligerence and mob rule. Or else why would you not strongly condemn such acts — and pledge exemplary actions against the miscreants — that are kicking your economy towards the edge? I’d say Yunus’s speech was downright disrespectful and offensive — to the business community, to all those who lost their lives in the movement to ouster the Sheikh Hasina government, and to the generations before us who built Bangladesh into what it is today. By harping on and on about the great sacrifice that the students made, he disrespected those who died as most of them were not public university students. By not talking about the private sector’s most pressing issue and lecturing them to do social business, he disrespected the entire business community and the spirit of entrepreneurship that drives our nation. By calling Bangladesh a rotten country that needs building from the ground up, he disrespected the generations before us that carried Bangladesh over from 1971. The speech was a trashy attempt at tapping into people’s emotions and was full of empty words. And yes, there were quite a few inaccuracies in that speech. No, Mr Yunus, the students’ movement was not about building a new Bangladesh — it was always about reforming the quota system for government jobs. Sheikh Hasina’s resignation was always the public’s demand — and long before this movement started. What is most outrageous is that he says he has come to drill in the message that we have the chance to rebuild Bangladesh because of the students’ deaths. C’mon, how can you manipulate facts like this? This is not expected from someone of his stature. He says the business tycoons should be grateful to the students because they have opened up new opportunities, that the business community should use those new opportunities to realise the students’ dreams of building a new Bangladesh. He urges the business community not to tread on the wrong path thinking about the dead students. How ridiculous does this sound to a balanced, rational adult? How did this man make a living as a motivational speaker all these years? At this point, his non-stop eulogising of the students is coming across as exceedingly obsequious and artificial. We were all there before July 2024, we all fought the good fight.

I was in disbelief while watching Muhammad Yunus’s speech to the business community on the 12th of September. That speech had zero substance, was not at all rooted in reality — and was self-serving through and through. The news of factory closures for labour unrest, production being hampered for days on end, vandalism of factories and businesses, work orders and investments being diverted from Bangladesh and the overall dicey law and order situation — are truly alarming developments. And I assume the gathering of the business community was to send out a strong message from the head of the government that such anarchy, mob justice, lawlessness and belligerence will not be tolerated any further. Let alone a strong message he didn’t even touch upon this issue. In his address to the nation on the 8th of September, he touched upon this issue barely in passing — when it should have been one of the highlights of his speech. You’d have even missed it were you not listening in to the speech with rapt attention. One way to construe his disinterest in the issue is that he tacitly approves of this newfound belligerence and mob rule. Or else why would you not strongly condemn such acts — and pledge exemplary actions against the miscreants — that are kicking your economy towards the edge? I’d say Yunus’s speech was downright disrespectful and offensive — to the business community, to all those who lost their lives in the movement to ouster the Sheikh Hasina government, and to the generations before us who built Bangladesh into what it is today. By harping on and on about the great sacrifice that the students made, he disrespected those who died as most of them were not public university students. By not talking about the private sector’s most pressing issue and lecturing them to do social business, he disrespected the entire business community and the spirit of entrepreneurship that drives our nation. By calling Bangladesh a rotten country that needs building from the ground up, he disrespected the generations before us that carried Bangladesh over from 1971. The speech was a trashy attempt at tapping into people’s emotions and was full of empty words. And yes, there were quite a few inaccuracies in that speech. No, Mr Yunus, the students’ movement was not about building a new Bangladesh — it was always about reforming the quota system for government jobs. Sheikh Hasina’s resignation was always the public’s demand — and long before this movement started. What is most outrageous is that he says he has come to drill in the message that we have the chance to rebuild Bangladesh because of the students’ deaths. C’mon, how can you manipulate facts like this? This is not expected from someone of his stature. He says the business tycoons should be grateful to the students because they have opened up new opportunities, that the business community should use those new opportunities to realise the students’ dreams of building a new Bangladesh. He urges the business community not to tread on the wrong path thinking about the dead students. How ridiculous does this sound to a balanced, rational adult? How did this man make a living as a motivational speaker all these years? At this point, his non-stop eulogising of the students is coming across as exceedingly obsequious and artificial. We were all there before July 2024, we all fought the good fight.

Sami

72,224 次观看 • 1 年前

Few public intellectuals have done more to warn Americans about how the coddling of children produces intolerant adults than Jonathan Haidt and Greg Lukianoff. Their 2018 book, The Coddling of the American Mind, argued that helicopter parenting, the decline of unsupervised play, and the rise of campus safetyism had set up a generation for failure. They warned that universities were teaching students three Great Untruths: that hardship makes you weaker, that you should always trust your feelings, and that life is a battle between good people and evil people. Haidt, a social psychologist and professor at NYU's Stern School of Business, has spent more than a decade documenting the link between fragility and authoritarianism. Lukianoff, the president of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, took over the group in 2006 and has spent two decades documenting censorship on American campuses. FIRE today operates with an annual budget above $32 million and a staff of 120, including roughly 20 lawyers. For exactly that reason, it was dispiriting to watch students at Haidt’s own university enact the behavior he and Lukianoff have spent a decade trying to combat. Graduates booed Haidt as NYU President Linda Mills welcomed him to the stage at Yankee Stadium on May 14, 2026. About three dozen students walked out of the venue while he spoke. The booing followed a May 5 open letter from the Executive Committee of the NYU Student Government Assembly, which called Haidt’s selection “deeply unsettling” and demanded that the administration reconsider its decision. Most revealingly, the committee complained that “many students have reported feelings of disappointment, disgust, unenthusiasm, defeat, and embarrassment,” language that mirrors the therapeutic vocabulary Haidt and Lukianoff diagnosed as the central pathology in Coddling. The students treated emotional discomfort with a speaker’s ideas as the equivalent of a physical threat. “Was he the safest option,” asked the students, without any apparent irony, “considering the current political climate and his critiques of liberal ideology?”.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the full article, and watch the full video!

Few public intellectuals have done more to warn Americans about how the coddling of children produces intolerant adults than Jonathan Haidt and Greg Lukianoff. Their 2018 book, The Coddling of the American Mind, argued that helicopter parenting, the decline of unsupervised play, and the rise of campus safetyism had set up a generation for failure. They warned that universities were teaching students three Great Untruths: that hardship makes you weaker, that you should always trust your feelings, and that life is a battle between good people and evil people. Haidt, a social psychologist and professor at NYU's Stern School of Business, has spent more than a decade documenting the link between fragility and authoritarianism. Lukianoff, the president of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, took over the group in 2006 and has spent two decades documenting censorship on American campuses. FIRE today operates with an annual budget above $32 million and a staff of 120, including roughly 20 lawyers. For exactly that reason, it was dispiriting to watch students at Haidt’s own university enact the behavior he and Lukianoff have spent a decade trying to combat. Graduates booed Haidt as NYU President Linda Mills welcomed him to the stage at Yankee Stadium on May 14, 2026. About three dozen students walked out of the venue while he spoke. The booing followed a May 5 open letter from the Executive Committee of the NYU Student Government Assembly, which called Haidt’s selection “deeply unsettling” and demanded that the administration reconsider its decision. Most revealingly, the committee complained that “many students have reported feelings of disappointment, disgust, unenthusiasm, defeat, and embarrassment,” language that mirrors the therapeutic vocabulary Haidt and Lukianoff diagnosed as the central pathology in Coddling. The students treated emotional discomfort with a speaker’s ideas as the equivalent of a physical threat. “Was he the safest option,” asked the students, without any apparent irony, “considering the current political climate and his critiques of liberal ideology?”.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the full article, and watch the full video!

Michael Shellenberger

24,669 次观看 • 3 个月前

We were just blocked from entering a public high school in Los Angeles to preach the gospel… And what happened next raises serious questions about discrimination against Christians and conservatives once again. Before the thousands of views, comments, and opinions — here’s the raw truth. Buckle up. Over the last two months, we’ve gone to nearly 30 public schools across Southern California. We’ve been invited by students, staff, and faculty to share during school hours at Christian clubs on campus. Thousands of students have responded to the gospel. Tears streaming down their faces, real salvation and even demons being casted out (that was the last controversy). Our heart is simple, to bless each school and make an eternal impact in the lives of students. Two days ago, I posted a video of students responding to Jesus at the previous school we visited. It’s reached millions of views online. The next morning, I received a message that a Los Angeles Unified School District board member had seen the video and is demanding it be taken down. The high crime of students coming to Jesus and being saved! God forbid! Problem number one: they thought it was filmed at the school we were scheduled to visit next. It wasn’t. Still, a call was arranged with faculty. We were told no audio or video recording on campus for the school we were visiting today. Problem number two: a quick search shows this same school has allowed other outside organizations to film and post content online. That is clear discrimination. Just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse. They only allowed two members of our four person team onto campus today. I was escorted into a private room with multiple faculty members and given a list of restrictions. Is this communist Cuba or North Korea? That was a legit thought at one point. We made our way to the classroom and I preached the gospel, it was powerful! And right as I was about to invite students forward — a loud fire alarm went off. You can’t even make this up. Coincidence? Most likely, right? I thought this ordeal was over but I was wrong. As I was praying for students after the club ended, a faculty member interrupted and told these specific students they had to leave for class immediately. Then that same faculty member stepped off school property onto public property in front of the school and approached our team members who had been barred from coming onto the campus. Why did he do that? To try to intimidate us as our team was praying for the students walking by! Friends, this is the United States of America. We must stand for both our constitutional rights and God given authority. Let me be clear, what’s our response? We aint backing down and NEVER will! If this matters to you, would you share this video so that the eyes of the world would see? It’s revival or we die and I choose revival!

We were just blocked from entering a public high school in Los Angeles to preach the gospel… And what happened next raises serious questions about discrimination against Christians and conservatives once again. Before the thousands of views, comments, and opinions — here’s the raw truth. Buckle up. Over the last two months, we’ve gone to nearly 30 public schools across Southern California. We’ve been invited by students, staff, and faculty to share during school hours at Christian clubs on campus. Thousands of students have responded to the gospel. Tears streaming down their faces, real salvation and even demons being casted out (that was the last controversy). Our heart is simple, to bless each school and make an eternal impact in the lives of students. Two days ago, I posted a video of students responding to Jesus at the previous school we visited. It’s reached millions of views online. The next morning, I received a message that a Los Angeles Unified School District board member had seen the video and is demanding it be taken down. The high crime of students coming to Jesus and being saved! God forbid! Problem number one: they thought it was filmed at the school we were scheduled to visit next. It wasn’t. Still, a call was arranged with faculty. We were told no audio or video recording on campus for the school we were visiting today. Problem number two: a quick search shows this same school has allowed other outside organizations to film and post content online. That is clear discrimination. Just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse. They only allowed two members of our four person team onto campus today. I was escorted into a private room with multiple faculty members and given a list of restrictions. Is this communist Cuba or North Korea? That was a legit thought at one point. We made our way to the classroom and I preached the gospel, it was powerful! And right as I was about to invite students forward — a loud fire alarm went off. You can’t even make this up. Coincidence? Most likely, right? I thought this ordeal was over but I was wrong. As I was praying for students after the club ended, a faculty member interrupted and told these specific students they had to leave for class immediately. Then that same faculty member stepped off school property onto public property in front of the school and approached our team members who had been barred from coming onto the campus. Why did he do that? To try to intimidate us as our team was praying for the students walking by! Friends, this is the United States of America. We must stand for both our constitutional rights and God given authority. Let me be clear, what’s our response? We aint backing down and NEVER will! If this matters to you, would you share this video so that the eyes of the world would see? It’s revival or we die and I choose revival!

Ross Johnston

17,681 次观看 • 4 个月前

🇺🇸 DEMOCRATS: KILL A CONSERVATIVE? FUNNY. GET FIRED? FASCISM Charlie Kirk was murdered while speaking to students The reaction from much of the left wasn’t horror... it was celebration. Social media exploded with gleeful posts calling him a “dead Nazi,” laughing at his death, and even demanding more violence. These weren’t randos in a dark corner of the internet. Some were teachers. Professors. Corporate employees. Then the firings began. Dozens were swiftly terminated as screenshots circulated. Turns out, bragging about political assassinations online has consequences. Cue the waterworks. “I lost my job over free speech!” they cried, somehow forgetting that Kirk lost his life for his. What’s rich is their sudden obsession with fairness. They cheered death, but collapse over pink slips. One woman sobbed that her world was “upside down.” Meanwhile, Kirk’s wife is planning a funeral. This wasn’t free speech; it was gleeful cruelty. And when the bill came due, the same crowd that cheered blood cried foul. Source: BBC, CBS, ATX

🇺🇸 DEMOCRATS: KILL A CONSERVATIVE? FUNNY. GET FIRED? FASCISM Charlie Kirk was murdered while speaking to students The reaction from much of the left wasn’t horror... it was celebration. Social media exploded with gleeful posts calling him a “dead Nazi,” laughing at his death, and even demanding more violence. These weren’t randos in a dark corner of the internet. Some were teachers. Professors. Corporate employees. Then the firings began. Dozens were swiftly terminated as screenshots circulated. Turns out, bragging about political assassinations online has consequences. Cue the waterworks. “I lost my job over free speech!” they cried, somehow forgetting that Kirk lost his life for his. What’s rich is their sudden obsession with fairness. They cheered death, but collapse over pink slips. One woman sobbed that her world was “upside down.” Meanwhile, Kirk’s wife is planning a funeral. This wasn’t free speech; it was gleeful cruelty. And when the bill came due, the same crowd that cheered blood cried foul. Source: BBC, CBS, ATX

Mario Nawfal

51,397 次观看 • 11 个月前

Students of Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Patiala are on a protest. About 400 of them are sitting at campus on 3rd day facing extreme hot weather, against the various systemic complaints against the Vice -Chancellor Mr. Jai Shankar Singh. The Vice Chancellor entered the female students’ hostel unannounced. He has earlier asked female students to take easy subjects! He is known to ask female teachers to come in ‘Hindustani Poshak’ and has repeatedly commented on the dresses of the students. Allegedly he showed complete lack of apathy when a few months earlier, there was an accident which resulted in the loss of lives of a few students. He is said to have commented ‘if you party late at night, what else do you expect.’ He has also commented on the financial status of students asking them why have they enrolled in an expensive college if their parents can’t pay the fee. This was said to a student who is a batch topper and is on scholarship, when there was a slight delay in making the payment of the college fees. What’s shocking is that there is so much administrative pressure on the students who are protesting that they are not being permitted to meet anyone. There are implied threats to students who speak to anyone , in terms of their marks deductions in upcoming exams. Students have appealed to the Visitor of the University- Justice Surya Kant, Hon’ble Judge of the Supreme Court ; and Chancellor Justice Sheel Nagu, Hon’ble Chief Justice of Punjab & Haryana High Court, to take cognisance of the matter and immediately expel the Vice Chancellor. The questions before us are - - Is closing down the institute a good way to deal with the situation? - Why protect the Vice - Chancellor, when there is clear cut violation of law. - It’s not a one off incident that students are complaining off. Why hand over the top institutes in such hands ? When he was a dean of law at Allahabad University, he was given a notice for entering a female teachers home at odd hours for expediting the last semester exam. - What about the Systemic Issue -Casual Sexism At Law School ? - What about the implementation of POSH? What happens when the complaint is against the top boss ? - What we see is the classic Anatomy of a people’s’ movement - divide the students ; show them fears about their careers ; call the POLICE and then close the university down. - Why does the boss always go scot-free ? - What’s the point of law if the accused are always protected by those in power ? - When was the training of POSH last done at university? If it is mandatory under POSH, then what happens when institutes/organisations don’t follow it ? - Character assassination - the classic ploy to respond to when female students raise any complaint, how long will this be tolerated? - What are we teaching them as students of constitutional law ? If as students of law, they can’t protest for their own rights, how are they expected to fight for the rights of others tomorrow? Remember, great institutions are not judged by the decorum of dress but the strength of character. Questions galore but here in support of these students and will always stand for the right fight! #RGNUL #protest #Patiala #JaiShankar

Students of Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Patiala are on a protest. About 400 of them are sitting at campus on 3rd day facing extreme hot weather, against the various systemic complaints against the Vice -Chancellor Mr. Jai Shankar Singh. The Vice Chancellor entered the female students’ hostel unannounced. He has earlier asked female students to take easy subjects! He is known to ask female teachers to come in ‘Hindustani Poshak’ and has repeatedly commented on the dresses of the students. Allegedly he showed complete lack of apathy when a few months earlier, there was an accident which resulted in the loss of lives of a few students. He is said to have commented ‘if you party late at night, what else do you expect.’ He has also commented on the financial status of students asking them why have they enrolled in an expensive college if their parents can’t pay the fee. This was said to a student who is a batch topper and is on scholarship, when there was a slight delay in making the payment of the college fees. What’s shocking is that there is so much administrative pressure on the students who are protesting that they are not being permitted to meet anyone. There are implied threats to students who speak to anyone , in terms of their marks deductions in upcoming exams. Students have appealed to the Visitor of the University- Justice Surya Kant, Hon’ble Judge of the Supreme Court ; and Chancellor Justice Sheel Nagu, Hon’ble Chief Justice of Punjab & Haryana High Court, to take cognisance of the matter and immediately expel the Vice Chancellor. The questions before us are - - Is closing down the institute a good way to deal with the situation? - Why protect the Vice - Chancellor, when there is clear cut violation of law. - It’s not a one off incident that students are complaining off. Why hand over the top institutes in such hands ? When he was a dean of law at Allahabad University, he was given a notice for entering a female teachers home at odd hours for expediting the last semester exam. - What about the Systemic Issue -Casual Sexism At Law School ? - What about the implementation of POSH? What happens when the complaint is against the top boss ? - What we see is the classic Anatomy of a people’s’ movement - divide the students ; show them fears about their careers ; call the POLICE and then close the university down. - Why does the boss always go scot-free ? - What’s the point of law if the accused are always protected by those in power ? - When was the training of POSH last done at university? If it is mandatory under POSH, then what happens when institutes/organisations don’t follow it ? - Character assassination - the classic ploy to respond to when female students raise any complaint, how long will this be tolerated? - What are we teaching them as students of constitutional law ? If as students of law, they can’t protest for their own rights, how are they expected to fight for the rights of others tomorrow? Remember, great institutions are not judged by the decorum of dress but the strength of character. Questions galore but here in support of these students and will always stand for the right fight! #RGNUL #protest #Patiala #JaiShankar

Avani Bansal

31,423 次观看 • 1 年前

Impact After Term | 14 : Turning Observation into Action — Expanding the Chief Minister's Breakfast Scheme to 1,350 Additional Students in Madurai Corporation Schools Sometimes, meaningful public policy begins with a simple observation. In August 2023, while inaugurating the second phase of the Chief Minister's Breakfast Scheme in Madurai district, Dr. Dr P Thiaga Rajan (PTR) interacted with Vishva, a Class VII student at the Government Kallar School in Muthupatti. During the interaction, he realised that while students up to Class V were covered under the scheme, many older students studying on the same campus continued to begin their school day without breakfast. Having himself studied in a boarding school, Dr. PTR understood the discomfort this could create among students and resolved that every child studying on the same campus should benefit from the scheme. After learning that 28 of Madurai Corporation's 64 schools had primary and upper-grade students studying on the same campus, Dr. PTR immediately requested the Corporation to pass a resolution extending breakfast support to all students in these schools, without placing any additional financial burden on the Corporation. He also directed officials to estimate the additional expenditure and personally mobilised CSR support, enabling the expansion to be implemented across all 28 schools within just 22 days. Today, an additional 1,350 students from Classes VI to XII receive breakfast every school day under this initiative. The programme continued with the same vendors, ensuring uniform quality of meals while also providing sufficient food for teaching and non-teaching staff. The success of the Madurai model was later reflected in the DMK's 2026 Election Manifesto, which included expanding the Chief Minister's Breakfast Scheme as a statewide commitment. Dr. PTR was a member of the manifesto drafting committee. What began with a simple observation evolved into a practical policy intervention—demonstrating how attentive leadership can strengthen an existing government programme, extend its reach, and improve the lives of hundreds more children without imposing an additional burden on the public exchequer. — Admin Team

Impact After Term | 14 : Turning Observation into Action — Expanding the Chief Minister's Breakfast Scheme to 1,350 Additional Students in Madurai Corporation Schools Sometimes, meaningful public policy begins with a simple observation. In August 2023, while inaugurating the second phase of the Chief Minister's Breakfast Scheme in Madurai district, Dr. Dr P Thiaga Rajan (PTR) interacted with Vishva, a Class VII student at the Government Kallar School in Muthupatti. During the interaction, he realised that while students up to Class V were covered under the scheme, many older students studying on the same campus continued to begin their school day without breakfast. Having himself studied in a boarding school, Dr. PTR understood the discomfort this could create among students and resolved that every child studying on the same campus should benefit from the scheme. After learning that 28 of Madurai Corporation's 64 schools had primary and upper-grade students studying on the same campus, Dr. PTR immediately requested the Corporation to pass a resolution extending breakfast support to all students in these schools, without placing any additional financial burden on the Corporation. He also directed officials to estimate the additional expenditure and personally mobilised CSR support, enabling the expansion to be implemented across all 28 schools within just 22 days. Today, an additional 1,350 students from Classes VI to XII receive breakfast every school day under this initiative. The programme continued with the same vendors, ensuring uniform quality of meals while also providing sufficient food for teaching and non-teaching staff. The success of the Madurai model was later reflected in the DMK's 2026 Election Manifesto, which included expanding the Chief Minister's Breakfast Scheme as a statewide commitment. Dr. PTR was a member of the manifesto drafting committee. What began with a simple observation evolved into a practical policy intervention—demonstrating how attentive leadership can strengthen an existing government programme, extend its reach, and improve the lives of hundreds more children without imposing an additional burden on the public exchequer. — Admin Team

Dr P Thiaga Rajan (PTR)

18,414 次观看 • 1 个月前

A case is going to the Supreme Court over a public New Jersey Middle School indoctrinating their students to Islam During class the students were taught - How to convert to be a Muslim and find their own Mosque - Having students declare there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger - May God help us all find the true faith, Islam - The Noble Quran. Divine revelation sent to Muhammad, last prophet of Allah, a perfect guide for humanity - The Noble Quran, without any doubt, an eloquent guide from Allah and Islam, a shining beacon against the darkness of repression segregation, intolerance, and racism - Praising Mohammed for killing nonbelievers “This was in a school. Even worse, the background music in one of the videos shown to the seventh graders featured the Qasida al-Burda, an Arabic poem that describes Christians and Jews as infidels and praises Muhammad in graphic detail for killing them. That wasn’t even the only video they were forced to watch. The next video explicitly instructed the students on how to recite the Muslim profession of faith, the Shahada and how to convert to Islam. It also taught them how to organize their own mosque tours. Mrs. Hilsenrath later discovered that her son had been given homework: a fill-in-the-blank worksheet that was nothing less than the Shahada itself, declaring there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger. The seventh-grade class was made to recite it aloud and write it down” The case is going to the Supreme Court “This is from the Thomas Moore Law Center that's petitioning the Supreme Court to reverse a lower court decision in an eight-year saga that all began in 2017 when Libby Hilsenrath discovered that her 12-year-old son was being shown propaganda videos at his middle school in New Jersey. Way over the line Islamic propaganda videos.”

A case is going to the Supreme Court over a public New Jersey Middle School indoctrinating their students to Islam During class the students were taught - How to convert to be a Muslim and find their own Mosque - Having students declare there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger - May God help us all find the true faith, Islam - The Noble Quran. Divine revelation sent to Muhammad, last prophet of Allah, a perfect guide for humanity - The Noble Quran, without any doubt, an eloquent guide from Allah and Islam, a shining beacon against the darkness of repression segregation, intolerance, and racism - Praising Mohammed for killing nonbelievers “This was in a school. Even worse, the background music in one of the videos shown to the seventh graders featured the Qasida al-Burda, an Arabic poem that describes Christians and Jews as infidels and praises Muhammad in graphic detail for killing them. That wasn’t even the only video they were forced to watch. The next video explicitly instructed the students on how to recite the Muslim profession of faith, the Shahada and how to convert to Islam. It also taught them how to organize their own mosque tours. Mrs. Hilsenrath later discovered that her son had been given homework: a fill-in-the-blank worksheet that was nothing less than the Shahada itself, declaring there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger. The seventh-grade class was made to recite it aloud and write it down” The case is going to the Supreme Court “This is from the Thomas Moore Law Center that's petitioning the Supreme Court to reverse a lower court decision in an eight-year saga that all began in 2017 when Libby Hilsenrath discovered that her 12-year-old son was being shown propaganda videos at his middle school in New Jersey. Way over the line Islamic propaganda videos.”

Wall Street Apes

361,985 次观看 • 8 个月前

𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐀𝐛𝐝𝐮𝐥 𝐊𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫, 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐫, 𝐒𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐀𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 (𝐒𝐀𝐃), 𝐁𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐥𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐡. "Dear Compatriots, As you know, the common people were holding protests across the country today demanding the resignation of this illegal, murderous government. But the Awami League, Jubo League and Chhatra League goons have disrupted our peaceful programme and fired indiscriminately at us in broad daylight. The last we heard, at least a hundred people were shot dead across the country. Dictator Sheikh Hasina must take responsibility for this massacre today -- and since the 15th of July. The people of Bangladesh did not vote for this government in the last three elections. The ongoing tsunami of protest against this government proves that 99 per cent people of the country hate this government. They are now holding on to power by killing innocent people with less than a percentage of armed and powerful people. Therefore, it is the moral responsibility of the international community to stand by the common people of Bangladesh and create international pressure to oust this fascist, murderous and authoritarian government before this series of massacres takes the form of genocide. We call upon the free world, the United Nations and in fact the world as a whole to immediately support our one-point demand: which is the resignation of Sheikh Hasina. We the students are not fighting for power. We don't have an iota of greed for it. We just want to establish for our generation and the future generations a just democratic state system where everyone can grow up with equal opportunities and rights. We are ready to give our lives for this. The people of the country have shown unprecedented solidarity in our movement. Now, the participation of common people is more than the students in this movement. We are overwhelmed by the incredible courage shown by children and the elderly, the women and the common man in joining this movement. We have seen how the youths are defying the bullets and conquering death with smiles on their faces, we have seen thousands of nameless labourers and toilers standing at the forefront of our march. We no longer fear the bullets. The more they fire at us, the more steadfast our resolve becomes -- this is igniting anger and hatred against this government like a gunpowder. Dear countrymen, you have already driven out the police forces of this government from many cities. Your next destination is Dhaka. Starting now, I urge all of you to head towards Dhaka. All of us will protest in Dhaka on Monday. You must be aware that the fascist, murderous and authoritarian Awami League regime has issued a curfew from 6 pm today. That was not out of concern for the safety of people and property but to safeguard its own party office and illegal government. But this government has no constitutional or moral right to take any such decision by violating the fundamental rights of the people. Therefore, let us all reject this curfew -- with hatred, with vigour. If Sheikh Hasina's forces fire at us, we will be forced to peacefully march towards Gono Bhaban to bring down the government. Together we shall be victorious!"

𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐀𝐛𝐝𝐮𝐥 𝐊𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫, 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐫, 𝐒𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐀𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 (𝐒𝐀𝐃), 𝐁𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐥𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐡. "Dear Compatriots, As you know, the common people were holding protests across the country today demanding the resignation of this illegal, murderous government. But the Awami League, Jubo League and Chhatra League goons have disrupted our peaceful programme and fired indiscriminately at us in broad daylight. The last we heard, at least a hundred people were shot dead across the country. Dictator Sheikh Hasina must take responsibility for this massacre today -- and since the 15th of July. The people of Bangladesh did not vote for this government in the last three elections. The ongoing tsunami of protest against this government proves that 99 per cent people of the country hate this government. They are now holding on to power by killing innocent people with less than a percentage of armed and powerful people. Therefore, it is the moral responsibility of the international community to stand by the common people of Bangladesh and create international pressure to oust this fascist, murderous and authoritarian government before this series of massacres takes the form of genocide. We call upon the free world, the United Nations and in fact the world as a whole to immediately support our one-point demand: which is the resignation of Sheikh Hasina. We the students are not fighting for power. We don't have an iota of greed for it. We just want to establish for our generation and the future generations a just democratic state system where everyone can grow up with equal opportunities and rights. We are ready to give our lives for this. The people of the country have shown unprecedented solidarity in our movement. Now, the participation of common people is more than the students in this movement. We are overwhelmed by the incredible courage shown by children and the elderly, the women and the common man in joining this movement. We have seen how the youths are defying the bullets and conquering death with smiles on their faces, we have seen thousands of nameless labourers and toilers standing at the forefront of our march. We no longer fear the bullets. The more they fire at us, the more steadfast our resolve becomes -- this is igniting anger and hatred against this government like a gunpowder. Dear countrymen, you have already driven out the police forces of this government from many cities. Your next destination is Dhaka. Starting now, I urge all of you to head towards Dhaka. All of us will protest in Dhaka on Monday. You must be aware that the fascist, murderous and authoritarian Awami League regime has issued a curfew from 6 pm today. That was not out of concern for the safety of people and property but to safeguard its own party office and illegal government. But this government has no constitutional or moral right to take any such decision by violating the fundamental rights of the people. Therefore, let us all reject this curfew -- with hatred, with vigour. If Sheikh Hasina's forces fire at us, we will be forced to peacefully march towards Gono Bhaban to bring down the government. Together we shall be victorious!"

Sami

81,646 次观看 • 2 年前

Speaking in the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Bill debate today, we should all focus on the requirement to save the jobs of those 3,500 people who have this threat hanging over them. China is pushing to shut down British steel industries, pushing forward to shut down the blast furnaces in the UK. Far too many countries like China have abused the rules of the free market, have subsidised their industries ridiculously, and have used slave labour to produce products. When that happens, the free market is dead. China now itself is suffering from an overproduction of steel. Their own housing industry has gone static on them, and they were one of the biggest users of the steel produced by China. Where is that steel going to go? It’s no surprise that a Chinese company Jingye is involved in this, because by pushing forward to shut down the blast furnaces in the UK, they know that we will have to buy slab steel from China. This is not a coincidence. This is all part of the plan. We must recognise that we will have to deal with those whom we trust and who do not break the rules. That means a whole rethink of the Government’s China policy. The previous Conservative Government should never have awarded it the contract, and I warned them about that. It is time for us to make sure that we deal with China at face value and do not accept the pretence that this company is private or in any way detached from its Government. That is a critical point. Cheap Chinese steel is a desperate problem for us, and we need to work with other countries in dealing with it. We also need to get our costs down. On Net Zero, I hope that the Secretary of State will tell the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero that we cannot go on like this. #BritishSteel

Speaking in the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Bill debate today, we should all focus on the requirement to save the jobs of those 3,500 people who have this threat hanging over them. China is pushing to shut down British steel industries, pushing forward to shut down the blast furnaces in the UK. Far too many countries like China have abused the rules of the free market, have subsidised their industries ridiculously, and have used slave labour to produce products. When that happens, the free market is dead. China now itself is suffering from an overproduction of steel. Their own housing industry has gone static on them, and they were one of the biggest users of the steel produced by China. Where is that steel going to go? It’s no surprise that a Chinese company Jingye is involved in this, because by pushing forward to shut down the blast furnaces in the UK, they know that we will have to buy slab steel from China. This is not a coincidence. This is all part of the plan. We must recognise that we will have to deal with those whom we trust and who do not break the rules. That means a whole rethink of the Government’s China policy. The previous Conservative Government should never have awarded it the contract, and I warned them about that. It is time for us to make sure that we deal with China at face value and do not accept the pretence that this company is private or in any way detached from its Government. That is a critical point. Cheap Chinese steel is a desperate problem for us, and we need to work with other countries in dealing with it. We also need to get our costs down. On Net Zero, I hope that the Secretary of State will tell the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero that we cannot go on like this. #BritishSteel

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

24,259 次观看 • 1 年前

American Pilot Can No Longer Stay Silent about The Kamala Harris Admin, “This needs to be heard” Hurricane Helene “Do not believe anything the government is telling you — There were hundreds of more people that were recently found and people are entombed in their cars, — They'll never be found in some cases and it's just heartbreaking.” “I think you need to know. I spent the early part of this week flying supplies in our bush planes. Me and some other guys kind of put together an effort in conjunction with Operation AirDrop — Do not believe anything the government is telling you. I have personally been up there for the first part of the week and there isn't any government up there. Your current administration is not up there.” “This is current administration because they wanted to politicize this thing. And I hate being political, but I'm going to be for a second. Decided that they would issue a TFR yesterday. And so while people are up there that could be within the last hour of their life, for the most part, the airspace was shut down. So any search and rescues that were going on, they had to stop. Planes couldn't fly because they had a TFR because some politician that wants to run for office has got to get their face on there and get a picture for the media to show that they've been there. Well, let me tell you something. They're not doing anything to help me and they're not trying to help, they're not doing anything to help the people that need it.” “It's one of the saddest things I've ever seen and the look on the folks faces that I saw when I got out of the airplane and unloaded the first goods to some people that hadn't seen anybody yet. It was it was something that I that'll live with me forever and I can't describe it.”

American Pilot Can No Longer Stay Silent about The Kamala Harris Admin, “This needs to be heard” Hurricane Helene “Do not believe anything the government is telling you — There were hundreds of more people that were recently found and people are entombed in their cars, — They'll never be found in some cases and it's just heartbreaking.” “I think you need to know. I spent the early part of this week flying supplies in our bush planes. Me and some other guys kind of put together an effort in conjunction with Operation AirDrop — Do not believe anything the government is telling you. I have personally been up there for the first part of the week and there isn't any government up there. Your current administration is not up there.” “This is current administration because they wanted to politicize this thing. And I hate being political, but I'm going to be for a second. Decided that they would issue a TFR yesterday. And so while people are up there that could be within the last hour of their life, for the most part, the airspace was shut down. So any search and rescues that were going on, they had to stop. Planes couldn't fly because they had a TFR because some politician that wants to run for office has got to get their face on there and get a picture for the media to show that they've been there. Well, let me tell you something. They're not doing anything to help me and they're not trying to help, they're not doing anything to help the people that need it.” “It's one of the saddest things I've ever seen and the look on the folks faces that I saw when I got out of the airplane and unloaded the first goods to some people that hadn't seen anybody yet. It was it was something that I that'll live with me forever and I can't describe it.”

Wall Street Apes

1,042,899 次观看 • 1 年前

On this day, 27 years ago, we chased what is well-known as the strongest #tornado in History. This shows the F5 tornado near peak intensity, just after devastating the community of Bridge Creek, Oklahoma. Aa freshman meteorology students at OU, we stupidly abandoned our Geo Tracker and took shelter under an overpass. Research was published that overpasses can accelerate the tornadic wind and be even more dangerous. We then saw the terrible devastation in Moore, Oklahoma with horses wandering down the highway and people emerging from their destroyed homes. Over 50 people lost their lives from the May 3, 1999 tornado outbreak. There was another massive violent tornado with a supercell to the north near Mulhall, Oklahoma that peaked after sunset. The tornado outbreak was still going when I woke up for class the next morning at 7 am. This is a day that Oklahomans will never forget. Enjoy the nice weather this May 3,

On this day, 27 years ago, we chased what is well-known as the strongest #tornado in History. This shows the F5 tornado near peak intensity, just after devastating the community of Bridge Creek, Oklahoma. Aa freshman meteorology students at OU, we stupidly abandoned our Geo Tracker and took shelter under an overpass. Research was published that overpasses can accelerate the tornadic wind and be even more dangerous. We then saw the terrible devastation in Moore, Oklahoma with horses wandering down the highway and people emerging from their destroyed homes. Over 50 people lost their lives from the May 3, 1999 tornado outbreak. There was another massive violent tornado with a supercell to the north near Mulhall, Oklahoma that peaked after sunset. The tornado outbreak was still going when I woke up for class the next morning at 7 am. This is a day that Oklahomans will never forget. Enjoy the nice weather this May 3,

Reed Timmer, PhD

366,890 次观看 • 3 个月前

Bill O’Reilly draws a direct parallel between the final days of Nazi Germany and the current situation in Iran, explaining why the Iranian people may not have risen up against the regime. O’REILLY: “So in the U.S. government and Israel were hopeful that the people would rise up in conjunction with the military destruction.” “And that has not happened.” “That has meant that the Pentagon has to basically redefine what a victory is. So regime change is starting to recede in the background.” “Now, this is not unusual.” “Students of history and people who’ve read my book Killing Patton know that in 1945 even though Germans were getting pummeled, okay, they would not turn on Hitler.” “They would not rise against him. Even in Berlin.” “And the reason was that SS shot them dead if there was any sign of rebellion.” “And we saw that when the Persians tried to demonstrate against the mullahs, 30,000 — and we’ve confirmed that figure — Iranians were killed by their own countrymen.” “So people are frightened. They’re scared to death, and I use that phrase literally, to rise up.” “It’s not likely that that will happen. So therefore, the definition of victory in Iran for the U.S. and Israel is to destroy every bit — and I mean that literally — of military infrastructure.” “Down to pistols if they can do it.” “Just wipe that out, so they have no chance to ever be on the offense again.”

Bill O’Reilly draws a direct parallel between the final days of Nazi Germany and the current situation in Iran, explaining why the Iranian people may not have risen up against the regime. O’REILLY: “So in the U.S. government and Israel were hopeful that the people would rise up in conjunction with the military destruction.” “And that has not happened.” “That has meant that the Pentagon has to basically redefine what a victory is. So regime change is starting to recede in the background.” “Now, this is not unusual.” “Students of history and people who’ve read my book Killing Patton know that in 1945 even though Germans were getting pummeled, okay, they would not turn on Hitler.” “They would not rise against him. Even in Berlin.” “And the reason was that SS shot them dead if there was any sign of rebellion.” “And we saw that when the Persians tried to demonstrate against the mullahs, 30,000 — and we’ve confirmed that figure — Iranians were killed by their own countrymen.” “So people are frightened. They’re scared to death, and I use that phrase literally, to rise up.” “It’s not likely that that will happen. So therefore, the definition of victory in Iran for the U.S. and Israel is to destroy every bit — and I mean that literally — of military infrastructure.” “Down to pistols if they can do it.” “Just wipe that out, so they have no chance to ever be on the offense again.”

Overton

78,088 次观看 • 5 个月前

RAY DALIO Lays Out How DOGE Can Save America From a Debt Spiral: Ray Dalio has a three part plan: ✅ Cut HARD -- goal: get the annual deficit down to 3% of GDP -- this would mean cutting the projected 2025 deficit by more than half -- $900B+ in cuts to a ~$1.8T 2025 deficit gets us ~3% ✅ Cut FAST -- the faster you cut, the less you have to cut ✅ Own the number -- everyone in government should galvanize around this Dalio on the urgency to make cuts NOW: " Do it soon, when the economy's good." "In other words, do it now." "If you have a bad economy, you cannot do it." Dalio on bond and interest rate impacts: " The other thing about it is to realize that if you make those moves, the bond market will benefit." david friedberg: " If the federal government were to cut spending significantly and quickly, the market would naturally react to lower rates." As Elon Musk mentions in the clip below, cutting spending lowers inflation, which eventually lowers interest payments and makes bonds more attractive for investors. Friedberg on avoiding the arithmetic death spiral: " The longer we wait, the more you have to cut in the future to get out of the hole." "And ultimately, this is the arithmetic death spiral that you get into." "I think that is so important for any person in government listening: the faster you cut, the less you have to cut."

RAY DALIO Lays Out How DOGE Can Save America From a Debt Spiral: Ray Dalio has a three part plan: ✅ Cut HARD -- goal: get the annual deficit down to 3% of GDP -- this would mean cutting the projected 2025 deficit by more than half -- $900B+ in cuts to a ~$1.8T 2025 deficit gets us ~3% ✅ Cut FAST -- the faster you cut, the less you have to cut ✅ Own the number -- everyone in government should galvanize around this Dalio on the urgency to make cuts NOW: " Do it soon, when the economy's good." "In other words, do it now." "If you have a bad economy, you cannot do it." Dalio on bond and interest rate impacts: " The other thing about it is to realize that if you make those moves, the bond market will benefit." david friedberg: " If the federal government were to cut spending significantly and quickly, the market would naturally react to lower rates." As Elon Musk mentions in the clip below, cutting spending lowers inflation, which eventually lowers interest payments and makes bonds more attractive for investors. Friedberg on avoiding the arithmetic death spiral: " The longer we wait, the more you have to cut in the future to get out of the hole." "And ultimately, this is the arithmetic death spiral that you get into." "I think that is so important for any person in government listening: the faster you cut, the less you have to cut."

The All-In Podcast

91,101 次观看 • 1 年前

Minister of State for Home Affairs Bandi Sanjay Kumar at Ashok Nagar- Hyderabad. Likely to proceed to the Secretariat with the TGPSC Aspirants. Let’s Understand what is the issue. Group 1 refers to the top-tier civil service examinations conducted by state public service commissions across India. These exams recruit candidates for senior administrative roles such as Deputy Collectors, DSPs, and other key positions in state governance. In Telangana, the Telangana Public Service Commission (TSPSC) oversees the Group 1 exam. The Telangana Group 1 exams are being conducted after a staggering 13-year gap (last held in 2011, with results declared in 2016). The government has notified 563 posts, including prestigious positions in state administration. Given this long delay, the exam has become extremely competitive, with thousands of aspirants dedicating years to preparation. However, the entire process is now clouded by serious issues regarding fairness, transparency, and procedural irregularities, which have cast a shadow over this crucial recruitment drive. What is G.O. 29? G.O. 29 is a government order from Telangana that changes the eligibility criteria and reservation norms, particularly impacting SC, ST, BC, and EWS categories. This order was issued after the Group 1 exam notification was released, causing widespread concern. Aspirants who were eligible under the previous rules now find themselves potentially disqualified. This abrupt change in reservation policy violates fundamental rights under Articles 15 and 16 of the Constitution, threatening the fairness of the selection process. Students are raising alarms that this could lead to years of legal battles, much like the 2011 Group 1 exam, which was tied up in litigation for several years. Why are they protesting? The protestors argue that G.O. 29 unfairly alters reservation norms mid-process, depriving many eligible candidates of their deserved opportunities. They demand clarity on study materials, as TSPSC declared Telugu Academy books non-standard just 10 days before the exam, despite students relying on them for subjects like Telangana history and geography. Additionally, students are calling attention to police brutality against peaceful protesters, adding another layer of injustice. What are the demands? - as per TGPSC Aspirants 1. No clarity on study materials: TSPSC invalidated Telugu Academy books just days before the exam, leaving students confused. 2. Uncertainty of results: The exam is mired in litigation, leaving students unsure whether their efforts will be recognized or invalidated. 3. Denial of fair reservations: G.O. 29 undermines constitutional guarantees of fair reservation, affecting various categories. The government defends G.O. 29, claiming it aims to align reservation systems with updated policies. However, protestors argue that these changes are unconstitutional and have only caused confusion and distress. The government's failure to communicate clear guidelines has intensified the unrest among students. Court order The Telangana High Court issued an interim order stating that the outcome of the Group 1 exams will depend on the final judgment, which is scheduled for November 20, 2024. This means that even if the exams are conducted, the results could be rendered invalid depending on the court's decision regarding G.O. 29. Students are asking for is a one-month postponement until the court delivers its final decision.

Minister of State for Home Affairs Bandi Sanjay Kumar at Ashok Nagar- Hyderabad. Likely to proceed to the Secretariat with the TGPSC Aspirants. Let’s Understand what is the issue. Group 1 refers to the top-tier civil service examinations conducted by state public service commissions across India. These exams recruit candidates for senior administrative roles such as Deputy Collectors, DSPs, and other key positions in state governance. In Telangana, the Telangana Public Service Commission (TSPSC) oversees the Group 1 exam. The Telangana Group 1 exams are being conducted after a staggering 13-year gap (last held in 2011, with results declared in 2016). The government has notified 563 posts, including prestigious positions in state administration. Given this long delay, the exam has become extremely competitive, with thousands of aspirants dedicating years to preparation. However, the entire process is now clouded by serious issues regarding fairness, transparency, and procedural irregularities, which have cast a shadow over this crucial recruitment drive. What is G.O. 29? G.O. 29 is a government order from Telangana that changes the eligibility criteria and reservation norms, particularly impacting SC, ST, BC, and EWS categories. This order was issued after the Group 1 exam notification was released, causing widespread concern. Aspirants who were eligible under the previous rules now find themselves potentially disqualified. This abrupt change in reservation policy violates fundamental rights under Articles 15 and 16 of the Constitution, threatening the fairness of the selection process. Students are raising alarms that this could lead to years of legal battles, much like the 2011 Group 1 exam, which was tied up in litigation for several years. Why are they protesting? The protestors argue that G.O. 29 unfairly alters reservation norms mid-process, depriving many eligible candidates of their deserved opportunities. They demand clarity on study materials, as TSPSC declared Telugu Academy books non-standard just 10 days before the exam, despite students relying on them for subjects like Telangana history and geography. Additionally, students are calling attention to police brutality against peaceful protesters, adding another layer of injustice. What are the demands? - as per TGPSC Aspirants 1. No clarity on study materials: TSPSC invalidated Telugu Academy books just days before the exam, leaving students confused. 2. Uncertainty of results: The exam is mired in litigation, leaving students unsure whether their efforts will be recognized or invalidated. 3. Denial of fair reservations: G.O. 29 undermines constitutional guarantees of fair reservation, affecting various categories. The government defends G.O. 29, claiming it aims to align reservation systems with updated policies. However, protestors argue that these changes are unconstitutional and have only caused confusion and distress. The government's failure to communicate clear guidelines has intensified the unrest among students. Court order The Telangana High Court issued an interim order stating that the outcome of the Group 1 exams will depend on the final judgment, which is scheduled for November 20, 2024. This means that even if the exams are conducted, the results could be rendered invalid depending on the court's decision regarding G.O. 29. Students are asking for is a one-month postponement until the court delivers its final decision.

@Coreena Enet Suares

31,338 次观看 • 1 年前