正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

20/20 Proctor Interview. 20/20 how do you not know basics. McAlberts entered the picture well before Jackson - 4 months prior Karen said it as recorded on a MSP body cam “Strikingly absent from his funeral was Karen Read” - yeah there was a court order to stay away.... She would have been arrested …. but I digress…. * SPOILER ALERT * Proctor pretends not to know the McAlberts still. Forgot to mention Kevin Albert. Colin. Having Julie as nanny No mention of the bribe Proctor’s bad feelings toward Karen progressed as the case went on… apparently that’s 10pm same day “No evidence” of planted taillight. Absolutely none. Probably bc people didn’t read the weather report he wrote Loud minority are against the corrupt 🤣 they “boo us” crazy ex gf thinking it was them not McAlberts Witness after said John never came in the house - no mention no one (+4 others) saw him on the lawn Solo cups and Stop & Shop - “unusual way” of collecting evidence and may have done “the best they could” Prosecution thinks the sucky investigation (my words) doesn’t impact the integrity of the investigation He’s not biased Proctor says - apparent only the world & MSP said he was “They don’t care what the evidence is” - Proctor (ironically and ridiculously) Texts were regrettable and he was sad bc it was a police office - but imo not sad enough to do a proper investigation “Wouldn’t change a thing” about the investigation Cried handing his uniform over but not performing a piss poor investigation or pinning on the girl It’s the internet’s faultshow more

Brooklyn James

1,733 subscribers

40,121 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育喜剧

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

5 条评论

Bre 的头像

Bre1 年前

@ABC2020 @jfkshowoff thank you for watching it so i don’t have to

jukeboxgrad 的头像

jukeboxgrad1 年前

@ABC2020 @jfkshowoff

Facts Over Feelings 的头像

Facts Over Feelings1 年前

@ABC2020 @jfkshowoff This all could have been avoided if one cop said Let's set up a tent, get a heater, and see what's under that snow SO SIMPLE.......WTF

MehThinks #FreePalestine 🇵🇸 🇮🇷 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 ☭ 的头像

MehThinks #FreePalestine 🇵🇸 🇮🇷 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 ☭1 年前

@ABC2020 @jfkshowoff I went to watch it knowing it would be bad. Nevertheless, I was still surprised by HOW BAD it was. The highlight was the so-called "law expert," whose only job was to spew the official narrative. Great to know all propaganda outlets have a person like that in their roster.

some kid 的头像

some kid1 年前

@ABC2020 @jfkshowoff #ArrestJenMcCabe

相关视频

Courtney Proctor said she and Michael “just didn’t talk about” the case. But on January 29, Michael texted her that the death was suspicious, told her not to tell anyone, identified Julie and Chris as witnesses, and said he needed to interview them. Then on February 1, before Proctor interviewed Julie and Chris, Courtney texted Michael that she was meeting with Julie. Later, Courtney claimed Michael did not even have Julie’s number and had to ask her for it “a few weeks into” the investigation. Michael was discussing Julie and Chris with Courtney on day one. Courtney was meeting with Julie before Michael interviewed her. Courtney and Julie communicated frequently. Yet we still do not have the communication showing who actually arranged the interview, how it was arranged, or when Proctor first contacted Julie and Chris. Courtney said they “didn’t talk about the case.” The texts say otherwise. And the missing communications trail sits directly between the investigator, his sister, and the witnesses he needed to interview. AND DONT FORGET, julie called Proctor just after their official interview, and he called her back and talked for 4 minutes

Sensitive content

Courtney Proctor said she and Michael “just didn’t talk about” the case. But on January 29, Michael texted her that the death was suspicious, told her not to tell anyone, identified Julie and Chris as witnesses, and said he needed to interview them. Then on February 1, before Proctor interviewed Julie and Chris, Courtney texted Michael that she was meeting with Julie. Later, Courtney claimed Michael did not even have Julie’s number and had to ask her for it “a few weeks into” the investigation. Michael was discussing Julie and Chris with Courtney on day one. Courtney was meeting with Julie before Michael interviewed her. Courtney and Julie communicated frequently. Yet we still do not have the communication showing who actually arranged the interview, how it was arranged, or when Proctor first contacted Julie and Chris. Courtney said they “didn’t talk about the case.” The texts say otherwise. And the missing communications trail sits directly between the investigator, his sister, and the witnesses he needed to interview. AND DONT FORGET, julie called Proctor just after their official interview, and he called her back and talked for 4 minutes

Dixie Normus

50,689 次观看 • 10 天前

JUST IN: Here is the video of Karen Read leaving court after the first day of defense testimony in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial. Karen lost her motion for a directed verdict and Hank Brennan shined on cross. Karen won't be calling Michael Proctor, although she may not be able to get his text messages into evidence unless he takes the stand during the defense's case. Judge Cannone is expected to issue a ruling on Monday as to whether the defense must call Proctor to the stand in order to introduce his text messages. The defense wants to call Proctor's friends to get the text messages into evidence, but that ran into a hearsay objection from Hank Brennan (and an end-of-day motion hearing on that issue). The defense is unlikely, if they are forced to call Proctor in order to get the texts into evidence, to do so, as Read's lawyers would be forced to ask open-ended questions of Proctor on direct (and Hank Brennan could then ask Proctor leading questions on cross).

JUST IN: Here is the video of Karen Read leaving court after the first day of defense testimony in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial. Karen lost her motion for a directed verdict and Hank Brennan shined on cross. Karen won't be calling Michael Proctor, although she may not be able to get his text messages into evidence unless he takes the stand during the defense's case. Judge Cannone is expected to issue a ruling on Monday as to whether the defense must call Proctor to the stand in order to introduce his text messages. The defense wants to call Proctor's friends to get the text messages into evidence, but that ran into a hearsay objection from Hank Brennan (and an end-of-day motion hearing on that issue). The defense is unlikely, if they are forced to call Proctor in order to get the texts into evidence, to do so, as Read's lawyers would be forced to ask open-ended questions of Proctor on direct (and Hank Brennan could then ask Proctor leading questions on cross).

Grant Smith Ellis

14,237 次观看 • 1 年前

The Proctor texts are repugnant. Whether they're 10 or 15 years old doesn't matter— they are hateful, misogynistic, racist, antisemitic, and utterly appalling—I was genuinely speechless when I read them. They are indefensible. They also have absolutely nothing to do with Karen Read, Jen McCabe, Matt McCabe, Brian Higgins, Brian Albert, or Nicole Albert—all of whom did not know Proctor prior to John O'Keefe's death. These despicable text messages have no bearing on the investigation into who is responsible for John O'Keefe's death. The police followed the evidence, and that evidence led them to the Lexus. The rich white woman was not framed, and no evidence was planted. The FBI investigated this and reached the same conclusion: No corruption or conspiracy. They allowed Read to stand trial TWICE for murder. How do you plant her admissions? How do you plant the her car’s tech stream data? How do you plant John’s cell phone data? How do you plant the broken tail light before the police were called? How do you plant the John’s cell phone battery temperature? How do you plant all her lies in her interviews to media? You don’t.

The Proctor texts are repugnant. Whether they're 10 or 15 years old doesn't matter— they are hateful, misogynistic, racist, antisemitic, and utterly appalling—I was genuinely speechless when I read them. They are indefensible. They also have absolutely nothing to do with Karen Read, Jen McCabe, Matt McCabe, Brian Higgins, Brian Albert, or Nicole Albert—all of whom did not know Proctor prior to John O'Keefe's death. These despicable text messages have no bearing on the investigation into who is responsible for John O'Keefe's death. The police followed the evidence, and that evidence led them to the Lexus. The rich white woman was not framed, and no evidence was planted. The FBI investigated this and reached the same conclusion: No corruption or conspiracy. They allowed Read to stand trial TWICE for murder. How do you plant her admissions? How do you plant the her car’s tech stream data? How do you plant John’s cell phone data? How do you plant the broken tail light before the police were called? How do you plant the John’s cell phone battery temperature? How do you plant all her lies in her interviews to media? You don’t.

Mama Llama

12,351 次观看 • 1 个月前

During Emily D. Baker ⚖️ 💜’s reading of Karen Read’s Motion to Compel, a significant allegation emerged. According to former MSP Trooper Michael Proctor’s own notes, he knew Colin Albert was inside 34 Fairview on the night Officer John O’Keefe was found dying on Brian Albert’s lawn on January 29, 2022. Yet Colin Albert was reportedly omitted from Proctor’s report and was not formally interviewed until approximately 18 months later. Think about that. A person Proctor allegedly knew was present inside the house was left out of his report and wasn’t questioned for a year and a half. If these allegations are accurate, they raise serious questions about the thoroughness and objectivity of the investigation. Why would someone known to be inside the house not be included in the report? Why the 18-month delay? Transparency matters. Accountability matters. And the public deserves answers. #KarenRead #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #Proctor #proctored

During Emily D. Baker ⚖️ 💜’s reading of Karen Read’s Motion to Compel, a significant allegation emerged. According to former MSP Trooper Michael Proctor’s own notes, he knew Colin Albert was inside 34 Fairview on the night Officer John O’Keefe was found dying on Brian Albert’s lawn on January 29, 2022. Yet Colin Albert was reportedly omitted from Proctor’s report and was not formally interviewed until approximately 18 months later. Think about that. A person Proctor allegedly knew was present inside the house was left out of his report and wasn’t questioned for a year and a half. If these allegations are accurate, they raise serious questions about the thoroughness and objectivity of the investigation. Why would someone known to be inside the house not be included in the report? Why the 18-month delay? Transparency matters. Accountability matters. And the public deserves answers. #KarenRead #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #Proctor #proctored

Kelly💚🌴

42,738 次观看 • 1 个月前

Why is Michael Proctor still employed by the Massachusetts State Police? Why is his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, commenting on an open investigation he’s involved in and heavily conflicted on? Why does Elizabeth Proctor—someone who doesn’t, nor did she ever, know #KarenRead have such illogical animus toward her when it was her own husband whose conduct was reprehensible & created all of the problems in this case? Yet she “fully supports” her husband? 😂 Why does Elizabeth Proctor clearly appear to have a personal stake in the outcome of this case, or Karen Read being found guilty when she says “Karen Read is a murderer”? It’s no wonder Michael Proctor felt so comfortable to say and do such immoral and unethical things in this case. His own wife emboldens him! Have these people no shame? It is because of Michael Proctor and HIS actions that Officer #JohnOKeefe will never get proper justice, but apparently Michael and Elizabeth Proctor are the victims. QUESTION: Do you feel safer knowing Michael Proctor is a State Police Officer? #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Why is Michael Proctor still employed by the Massachusetts State Police? Why is his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, commenting on an open investigation he’s involved in and heavily conflicted on? Why does Elizabeth Proctor—someone who doesn’t, nor did she ever, know #KarenRead have such illogical animus toward her when it was her own husband whose conduct was reprehensible & created all of the problems in this case? Yet she “fully supports” her husband? 😂 Why does Elizabeth Proctor clearly appear to have a personal stake in the outcome of this case, or Karen Read being found guilty when she says “Karen Read is a murderer”? It’s no wonder Michael Proctor felt so comfortable to say and do such immoral and unethical things in this case. His own wife emboldens him! Have these people no shame? It is because of Michael Proctor and HIS actions that Officer #JohnOKeefe will never get proper justice, but apparently Michael and Elizabeth Proctor are the victims. QUESTION: Do you feel safer knowing Michael Proctor is a State Police Officer? #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

160,390 次观看 • 2 年前

there is another important detail in Julie’s text thread that is easy to overlook. she never actually answered Michael Proctor’s question. Proctor told her that Colin’s attorney was not returning his calls. He asked Julie and Chris to speak with Colin and find out what day and time worked for another interview. Julie did not say she would ask Colin. She did not provide a date. She did not refer Proctor back to the attorney. She did not decline. Instead, she answered only the personal part “Same to you and E. It all really sucks. Hope the kids are doing good.” Proctor then gave that response a thumbs-up. So where is the rest of the conversation? How was Colin’s interview ultimately coordinated? Was it done over the phone, through Chris, through the attorney, or through messages that were no longer present? Because the one Proctor exchange investigators found on Julie’s phone contains a request, but no actual answer.

there is another important detail in Julie’s text thread that is easy to overlook. she never actually answered Michael Proctor’s question. Proctor told her that Colin’s attorney was not returning his calls. He asked Julie and Chris to speak with Colin and find out what day and time worked for another interview. Julie did not say she would ask Colin. She did not provide a date. She did not refer Proctor back to the attorney. She did not decline. Instead, she answered only the personal part “Same to you and E. It all really sucks. Hope the kids are doing good.” Proctor then gave that response a thumbs-up. So where is the rest of the conversation? How was Colin’s interview ultimately coordinated? Was it done over the phone, through Chris, through the attorney, or through messages that were no longer present? Because the one Proctor exchange investigators found on Julie’s phone contains a request, but no actual answer.

Dixie Normus

32,143 次观看 • 13 天前

#KarenRead The sordid tale of Karen Read and the Feds. Who opened the federal investigation? While we may never know with certainty the who, why, and how, surrounding the opening of the federal investigation in the Read matter, we do have clues, courtesy of Read, her attorneys and activist blogger Aidan Kearney. On the left, a detailed timeline of the involvement of the parties and their communications with key dates related to information leaked regarding the federal investigation. On the right, a minute long video showing: 1. Jackson using Kearney's blog to get into the public sphere what should have been a secret federal investigation 2. Scanlon in a wiretapped call stating he didn't know who Colin Albert was or that he'd been in the house, in direct opposition to Yanetti's claims 3. Kearney telling his audience in July of 2023 he thought it was Yanetti who opened the investigation and given he was in communication with Yanetti, it's not a far stretch to wonder if that thought originated through those communications. 4. Yanetti stating in open court the defense had done their own investigation into Brian Albert & Colin Albert, which also not so coincidentally seemed to exactly fit with the information the Feds were investigating. If Karen Read and her team embellished the information given to the Feds in order to petition for an investigation, and if they then exploited that investigation in a bid to drum up public support for Read and pressure the Commonwealth to drop their case, that would be a very serious matter indeed. One thing I do know with certainty though, if you listen close enough, people will usually tell on themselves and sometimes, things are as simple as they appear.

#KarenRead The sordid tale of Karen Read and the Feds. Who opened the federal investigation? While we may never know with certainty the who, why, and how, surrounding the opening of the federal investigation in the Read matter, we do have clues, courtesy of Read, her attorneys and activist blogger Aidan Kearney. On the left, a detailed timeline of the involvement of the parties and their communications with key dates related to information leaked regarding the federal investigation. On the right, a minute long video showing: 1. Jackson using Kearney's blog to get into the public sphere what should have been a secret federal investigation 2. Scanlon in a wiretapped call stating he didn't know who Colin Albert was or that he'd been in the house, in direct opposition to Yanetti's claims 3. Kearney telling his audience in July of 2023 he thought it was Yanetti who opened the investigation and given he was in communication with Yanetti, it's not a far stretch to wonder if that thought originated through those communications. 4. Yanetti stating in open court the defense had done their own investigation into Brian Albert & Colin Albert, which also not so coincidentally seemed to exactly fit with the information the Feds were investigating. If Karen Read and her team embellished the information given to the Feds in order to petition for an investigation, and if they then exploited that investigation in a bid to drum up public support for Read and pressure the Commonwealth to drop their case, that would be a very serious matter indeed. One thing I do know with certainty though, if you listen close enough, people will usually tell on themselves and sometimes, things are as simple as they appear.

Julie Carpenter

53,179 次观看 • 1 年前

New Video- SERT SEARCH: Hiding The Damage When you look at this case through the lens that the MSP (Tully, Proctor & Yuri) were working an "honest investigation, not covering anything up"- is when you truly see how unexplainable their actions during the investigation were. Looking through that lens, when you think about Yuri, Proctor & Tully NOT providing SERT A photograph of the damaged taillight, there is no explanation for it. -They "KNEW" how much damage there was to the taillight -They KNEW SERT was at the scene LOOKING for the taillight -They KNEW that nobody at the scene knew how much damage was at the time. KNOWING this, for them to not send a picture to Tully of the damage to assist the SERT search makes ZERO sense. They should have WANTED to find as much taillight as possible. The problem is, the taillight they needed to be there, wasn't. yet.

New Video- SERT SEARCH: Hiding The Damage When you look at this case through the lens that the MSP (Tully, Proctor & Yuri) were working an "honest investigation, not covering anything up"- is when you truly see how unexplainable their actions during the investigation were. Looking through that lens, when you think about Yuri, Proctor & Tully NOT providing SERT A photograph of the damaged taillight, there is no explanation for it. -They "KNEW" how much damage there was to the taillight -They KNEW SERT was at the scene LOOKING for the taillight -They KNEW that nobody at the scene knew how much damage was at the time. KNOWING this, for them to not send a picture to Tully of the damage to assist the SERT search makes ZERO sense. They should have WANTED to find as much taillight as possible. The problem is, the taillight they needed to be there, wasn't. yet.

Joe Flipperhead

51,464 次观看 • 1 年前

So you mean to tell me, the one "gotcha" Michael Proctor used on the stand to try and persuade the jury in Karen Read Trial 1, that he "was already scheduled to be on call" so he wasn't chosen to take the John O'Keefe case, was all a LIE?? Why did Bukake call Proctor to take the case if he WASN'T EVEN ON CALL THAT MORNING?? And how did he know that Lank was already on scene? It is so obvious to anyone with a brain that this was a setup. I would be willing to bet my life that Kevin Albert was informed about what happened and asked Bukake to call Proctor and make him lead investigator so that the cover up for his brother, Brian Albert, could be set in motion. Proctor is a FUCKING FOOL and a POS for doing what he did. He was, in fact, NOT ON CALL that morning, but Buhkenik wants everyone to believe the schedule is made the month prior, "well in advance" of the day Proctor was "on call". Except THIS SCHEDULE SAYS OTHERWISE. Liars, all liars. #KarenReadWasFramed #MichaelProctor #Buhkenik #Bukake #FKR #FreeTurtleboy #NCDAO #Corruption

So you mean to tell me, the one "gotcha" Michael Proctor used on the stand to try and persuade the jury in Karen Read Trial 1, that he "was already scheduled to be on call" so he wasn't chosen to take the John O'Keefe case, was all a LIE?? Why did Bukake call Proctor to take the case if he WASN'T EVEN ON CALL THAT MORNING?? And how did he know that Lank was already on scene? It is so obvious to anyone with a brain that this was a setup. I would be willing to bet my life that Kevin Albert was informed about what happened and asked Bukake to call Proctor and make him lead investigator so that the cover up for his brother, Brian Albert, could be set in motion. Proctor is a FUCKING FOOL and a POS for doing what he did. He was, in fact, NOT ON CALL that morning, but Buhkenik wants everyone to believe the schedule is made the month prior, "well in advance" of the day Proctor was "on call". Except THIS SCHEDULE SAYS OTHERWISE. Liars, all liars. #KarenReadWasFramed #MichaelProctor #Buhkenik #Bukake #FKR #FreeTurtleboy #NCDAO #Corruption

That Girl T

26,008 次观看 • 3 个月前

In today's Karen Read hearing, Michael Proctor's attorney CONFIRMED everything we knew was on his new phone extraction.. essentially his attorney pled, “yes the phone is bad… but please don’t let her see HOW bad.” Proctor’s attorney said on the record that this 13-year phone dump contains: 🔹️Photos of intimate body parts 🔹️Images of people not involved in anything 🔹️Names of sexual assault victims 🔹️A whole lot of deeply personal material And then (I kid you not) he tells the judge to “assume” there might be ✨️homophobic texts✨️ … and “assume” there could be ✨️antisemitic messages✨️ from years ago. Sir… WHY are those your go-to examples unless that’s exactly what’s in there? 🗣🗣🗣 He continued his argument that none of it is relevant because Proctor didn’t meet Karen until January 29th, 2022 (the day John O'Keefe was murdered) and called this a “fishing expedition.” He also said this is “just a civil case” where no one is going to jail and no constitutional rights are at issue. (Meanwhile Karen is literally suing him for violating her constitutional rights.) They tried the classic, “she already got 38,707 pages of discovery.” 🙄 From a DIFFERENT phone. Before the mistrial. Before the second trial. Before all the new chaos. And then tried to tell the court that this was the improper venue and to request discovery directly from Proctor himself. The issue? Read's team has already tried that, hence filing in these other cases to force the hand of the DA's office to hand it over because Proctor has since lost that very cell phone. So no, she cannot just subpoena him directly. The ONLY copy left is with the Commonwealth. The same people fighting to keep it sealed. Multiple other defendants from Proctor cases already got this extraction. But Karen Read? Nope. The DA's office protecting Proctor (still) is no surprise but his attorney confirming to the public that yes, he is in fact a piece of shit? Priceless. 👩‍🍳💋

In today's Karen Read hearing, Michael Proctor's attorney CONFIRMED everything we knew was on his new phone extraction.. essentially his attorney pled, “yes the phone is bad… but please don’t let her see HOW bad.” Proctor’s attorney said on the record that this 13-year phone dump contains: 🔹️Photos of intimate body parts 🔹️Images of people not involved in anything 🔹️Names of sexual assault victims 🔹️A whole lot of deeply personal material And then (I kid you not) he tells the judge to “assume” there might be ✨️homophobic texts✨️ … and “assume” there could be ✨️antisemitic messages✨️ from years ago. Sir… WHY are those your go-to examples unless that’s exactly what’s in there? 🗣🗣🗣 He continued his argument that none of it is relevant because Proctor didn’t meet Karen until January 29th, 2022 (the day John O'Keefe was murdered) and called this a “fishing expedition.” He also said this is “just a civil case” where no one is going to jail and no constitutional rights are at issue. (Meanwhile Karen is literally suing him for violating her constitutional rights.) They tried the classic, “she already got 38,707 pages of discovery.” 🙄 From a DIFFERENT phone. Before the mistrial. Before the second trial. Before all the new chaos. And then tried to tell the court that this was the improper venue and to request discovery directly from Proctor himself. The issue? Read's team has already tried that, hence filing in these other cases to force the hand of the DA's office to hand it over because Proctor has since lost that very cell phone. So no, she cannot just subpoena him directly. The ONLY copy left is with the Commonwealth. The same people fighting to keep it sealed. Multiple other defendants from Proctor cases already got this extraction. But Karen Read? Nope. The DA's office protecting Proctor (still) is no surprise but his attorney confirming to the public that yes, he is in fact a piece of shit? Priceless. 👩‍🍳💋

BoozeyBeauty

114,053 次观看 • 5 个月前

REASONABLE DOUBT REASON # 1: #KarenReadTrial If a medical examiner couldn’t even determine #JohnOKeefe’s death was a homicide, how can anyone on the jury? Fun Fact: Over 4 months after Karen Read was first arrested, on June 10, 2022, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office upgraded her charges from manslaughter to second degree murder despite the fact that their medical examiner couldn’t even determine if it was a homicide. At that time in June 2022, the DA’s Office said that while some of Officer O’Keefe’s injuries were apparently known, the full autopsy findings were purportedly “not complete”. Hmm… 🤔 Was it that they were “not complete”? Or was it that they were complete but didn’t fit your narrative? The DA’s Office further went on to state: "While the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner has accepted the case and will determine the cause and manner of death.” Despite apparently having neither a cause nor manner of death determination, apparently someone thought it was a good idea to charge Karen Read with not only manslaughter, but also second degree murder. Antithetical to the entire purpose of an investigation, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office and its Massachusetts State Police investigators don’t follow the evidence. Instead, they desperately twist and contort to try to make the evidence fit their narrative. Is this how we get to the truth? Is this why Michael Proctor was texting Trooper David DiCicco on April 28, 2022—in the lead up to the state grand jury to try to secure an indictment on upgraded charges—about how he wasn’t following the evidence in this case, but instead was trying to pressure the medical examiner to give him the determinations he wanted? The DA’s Office itself subsequently said “the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall” and didn’t have a cause or manner of death determination! 🤯 THAT’S REASONABLE DOUBT. Prosecutors have a duty to pursue justice. They have ethical obligations. Per ABA’s Standards for the Prosecution Function, Standard 3-4.6 says that: “A prosecutor should not seek an indictment unless the prosecutor reasonably believes the charges are supported by probable cause and that there will be admissible evidence sufficient to support the charges beyond reasonable doubt at trial.” This particularly applies to the Quality and Scope of Evidence Before a Grand Jury. Yet, despite having the definition of reasonable doubt, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office moved ahead with charges and upgraded charges against Karen anyway… …because, hey, according to them it could’ve been an “accidental fall”… …which would mean that Karen Read did not kill John O’Keefe, and she’s entirely innocent… …but who cares about the truth anyways? Apparently not this DA’s Office. It’s not like someone’s life isn’t hanging in the balance or anything. I guess this all explains why the Commonwealth wanted to conceal these inconvenient truths—that John’s manner of death could not be determined—evidence exculpatory to Karen Read. They sought to preclude this from the jury at trial (per their Motion In Limine to keep out John’s manner of death evidence)—because, forget about trying to get at the truth of the matter! This was never about justice. ——— VIDEO about reasonable doubt (attached) — Attorney David Howard gives one of my favorite analogy’s for reasonable doubt. Where was there not reasonable doubt in Karen Read’s case? I’m beyond eager to hear any of the jurors from her trial explain this. Anyone have any ideas? #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenRead #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead #PoliceCorruption

REASONABLE DOUBT REASON # 1: #KarenReadTrial If a medical examiner couldn’t even determine #JohnOKeefe’s death was a homicide, how can anyone on the jury? Fun Fact: Over 4 months after Karen Read was first arrested, on June 10, 2022, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office upgraded her charges from manslaughter to second degree murder despite the fact that their medical examiner couldn’t even determine if it was a homicide. At that time in June 2022, the DA’s Office said that while some of Officer O’Keefe’s injuries were apparently known, the full autopsy findings were purportedly “not complete”. Hmm… 🤔 Was it that they were “not complete”? Or was it that they were complete but didn’t fit your narrative? The DA’s Office further went on to state: "While the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner has accepted the case and will determine the cause and manner of death.” Despite apparently having neither a cause nor manner of death determination, apparently someone thought it was a good idea to charge Karen Read with not only manslaughter, but also second degree murder. Antithetical to the entire purpose of an investigation, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office and its Massachusetts State Police investigators don’t follow the evidence. Instead, they desperately twist and contort to try to make the evidence fit their narrative. Is this how we get to the truth? Is this why Michael Proctor was texting Trooper David DiCicco on April 28, 2022—in the lead up to the state grand jury to try to secure an indictment on upgraded charges—about how he wasn’t following the evidence in this case, but instead was trying to pressure the medical examiner to give him the determinations he wanted? The DA’s Office itself subsequently said “the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall” and didn’t have a cause or manner of death determination! 🤯 THAT’S REASONABLE DOUBT. Prosecutors have a duty to pursue justice. They have ethical obligations. Per ABA’s Standards for the Prosecution Function, Standard 3-4.6 says that: “A prosecutor should not seek an indictment unless the prosecutor reasonably believes the charges are supported by probable cause and that there will be admissible evidence sufficient to support the charges beyond reasonable doubt at trial.” This particularly applies to the Quality and Scope of Evidence Before a Grand Jury. Yet, despite having the definition of reasonable doubt, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office moved ahead with charges and upgraded charges against Karen anyway… …because, hey, according to them it could’ve been an “accidental fall”… …which would mean that Karen Read did not kill John O’Keefe, and she’s entirely innocent… …but who cares about the truth anyways? Apparently not this DA’s Office. It’s not like someone’s life isn’t hanging in the balance or anything. I guess this all explains why the Commonwealth wanted to conceal these inconvenient truths—that John’s manner of death could not be determined—evidence exculpatory to Karen Read. They sought to preclude this from the jury at trial (per their Motion In Limine to keep out John’s manner of death evidence)—because, forget about trying to get at the truth of the matter! This was never about justice. ——— VIDEO about reasonable doubt (attached) — Attorney David Howard gives one of my favorite analogy’s for reasonable doubt. Where was there not reasonable doubt in Karen Read’s case? I’m beyond eager to hear any of the jurors from her trial explain this. Anyone have any ideas? #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenRead #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

236,339 次观看 • 2 年前

If Lead Investigator Michael Proctor is depraved enough to unlawfully search #KarenRead’s cellphone for nude photographs of her on January 29, 2022, then what’s not to say he wouldn’t delete the Ring cam videos that subsequently went missing, too? FACT: Both the videos in the Ring cam system & the photographs on Karen Read’s cellphone were accessed unlawfully, without search warrants, by Michael Proctor. Proctor also hid his conflict, failed to recuse himself & then lied for the next 2 years, steadfastly defending the falsehood that he wasn’t lifelong family friends with the Albert’s & McCabe’s. We now know that was a lie. But here’s the thing: Karen immediately turned over her cellphone to Trooper Proctor. So if there’s evidence that Ring cam videos were deleted from her cellphone after Michael Proctor seized it, then it’d be pretty damning proof that he deleted the videos. —————— How did Proctor access Karen Read’s cellphone so quickly, on day 1, when he was searching it for nude photos of her? Fully cooperative & eager to help in the investigation, Karen Read promptly accessed her cellphone in front of investigators to provide them with the contact info of everyone who was present the night before with her & John. Notably, Karen Read voluntarily turned her cellphone over to investigators, without a search warrant, when she was FIRST able to speak with them. These are the actions of an honest & forthcoming witness. Not a murderer. —————— The Commonwealth tells on itself, revealing just how Proctor accessed her cellphone without a search warrant (below) in its own filings: “The troopers further asked the defendant for contact information relating to the people she had indicated were present at the bars. The defendant obliged, and prior to providing said information, the troopers observed the defendant to enter a numerical passcode into her phone to unlock it, prior to retrieving said data.” —————— If Proctor preyed upon Karen Read’s trust by secretly watching her enter her passcode to unlock her cellphone, and remembering it for later so he could go through her phone, without a search warrant, looking for nude photos & other things unrelated to the investigation, then we already know he’s perfectly willing to unlawfully access things on her cellphone for nefarious purposes. If Karen had the Ring app on her cellphone, what’s not to say Proctor didn’t access it to delete videos? Ask yourself this: If Karen Read were guilty, would she be asking for Ring data & videos that’d incriminate her? If Trooper Proctor didn’t unlawfully access the Ring app from either John or Karen’s phones to delete videos, then why would he contact & ask Ring wanting to know how long until their stored user data & videos are deleted from their servers for LE? Which is exactly what Proctor did on February 10, 2022, just days after arresting Karen Read, when he contacted them in an email from subpoenas@ring.com stating that the Ring videos had been deleted from DropBox after 90 days. If Proctor’s theory was that Karen struck & killed John with her taillight, breaking it into 45 pieces left at the scene, wouldn’t he be immediately filing a search warrant for those Ring videos to show that proof? If Proctor had unlawfully deleted those Ring videos himself though, he’d probably want to know how long until they’d be gone from Ring’s servers—evidence of HIS consciousness of guilt—so he could run out the clock so that they’re unable to be obtained, even when he does ultimately file a search warrant. Might that explain why he lied, purporting to have had a search warrant when he didn’t, knowing that the defense would’ve immediately filed an emergency motion to preserve that evidence? They ran out the clock & even lied to the defense so that there was no possible way for them to intervene before the evidence was fully destroyed & irretrievable. #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

If Lead Investigator Michael Proctor is depraved enough to unlawfully search #KarenRead’s cellphone for nude photographs of her on January 29, 2022, then what’s not to say he wouldn’t delete the Ring cam videos that subsequently went missing, too? FACT: Both the videos in the Ring cam system & the photographs on Karen Read’s cellphone were accessed unlawfully, without search warrants, by Michael Proctor. Proctor also hid his conflict, failed to recuse himself & then lied for the next 2 years, steadfastly defending the falsehood that he wasn’t lifelong family friends with the Albert’s & McCabe’s. We now know that was a lie. But here’s the thing: Karen immediately turned over her cellphone to Trooper Proctor. So if there’s evidence that Ring cam videos were deleted from her cellphone after Michael Proctor seized it, then it’d be pretty damning proof that he deleted the videos. —————— How did Proctor access Karen Read’s cellphone so quickly, on day 1, when he was searching it for nude photos of her? Fully cooperative & eager to help in the investigation, Karen Read promptly accessed her cellphone in front of investigators to provide them with the contact info of everyone who was present the night before with her & John. Notably, Karen Read voluntarily turned her cellphone over to investigators, without a search warrant, when she was FIRST able to speak with them. These are the actions of an honest & forthcoming witness. Not a murderer. —————— The Commonwealth tells on itself, revealing just how Proctor accessed her cellphone without a search warrant (below) in its own filings: “The troopers further asked the defendant for contact information relating to the people she had indicated were present at the bars. The defendant obliged, and prior to providing said information, the troopers observed the defendant to enter a numerical passcode into her phone to unlock it, prior to retrieving said data.” —————— If Proctor preyed upon Karen Read’s trust by secretly watching her enter her passcode to unlock her cellphone, and remembering it for later so he could go through her phone, without a search warrant, looking for nude photos & other things unrelated to the investigation, then we already know he’s perfectly willing to unlawfully access things on her cellphone for nefarious purposes. If Karen had the Ring app on her cellphone, what’s not to say Proctor didn’t access it to delete videos? Ask yourself this: If Karen Read were guilty, would she be asking for Ring data & videos that’d incriminate her? If Trooper Proctor didn’t unlawfully access the Ring app from either John or Karen’s phones to delete videos, then why would he contact & ask Ring wanting to know how long until their stored user data & videos are deleted from their servers for LE? Which is exactly what Proctor did on February 10, 2022, just days after arresting Karen Read, when he contacted them in an email from [email protected] stating that the Ring videos had been deleted from DropBox after 90 days. If Proctor’s theory was that Karen struck & killed John with her taillight, breaking it into 45 pieces left at the scene, wouldn’t he be immediately filing a search warrant for those Ring videos to show that proof? If Proctor had unlawfully deleted those Ring videos himself though, he’d probably want to know how long until they’d be gone from Ring’s servers—evidence of HIS consciousness of guilt—so he could run out the clock so that they’re unable to be obtained, even when he does ultimately file a search warrant. Might that explain why he lied, purporting to have had a search warrant when he didn’t, knowing that the defense would’ve immediately filed an emergency motion to preserve that evidence? They ran out the clock & even lied to the defense so that there was no possible way for them to intervene before the evidence was fully destroyed & irretrievable. #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

153,072 次观看 • 2 年前

On the VERY DAY Karen was arrested… Julie Albert spent 12 minutes on the phone with Courtney Proctor YOU KNOW… Trooper Michael Proctor’s sister. The sister of the lead investigator who had not even interviewed the Alberts yet. Twelve minutes… on arrest day. Let that marinate. ON FEBRUARY 2, 2022 THE DAY OF KAREN’S ARRAIGNMENT Before 9 AM before Karen even walked into the courtroom Julie Albert has THREE MORE CALLS with Courtney Proctor. What could they possibly be talking about that morning? Brunch plans? Yoga classes? Or maybe… the arraignment Karen Read??? At 10:58 AM THERE IS A 27 MINUTE CALL A nearly half-hour conversation with the lead investigator’s sister after the arraignment. Gee, I wonder what they discussed, The weather? The Patriots? Or maybe… the arraignment that had literally just happened? This is not normal. This is not random. This is access. THEN 13 days after John O’Keefe died…Julie and Chris Albert were finally interviewed. AT 5:30 PM But get this, They were interviewed together, not separately. They were interviewed in their home, not at a station. They were interviewed without Colin present, So the concerned mother brings… Not Colin. Just herself. And sits next to her husband while they give a joint story. This is not how serious homicide investigations usually work. Unless the goal is not clarity… but containment. Right after their interview ends, Julie calls Trooper Proctor’s personal cellphone for 5 seconds (a “call me back” ping) then at 6:21 Proctor calls her back for 4 minutes, because apparently the lead investigator needed a quick check-in with a family whose son was at 34 Fairview minutes before a man was found dying in the snow and he had just interviewed her moments earlier! But they want you to believe they had No special access, No coaching No “off the books” conversations, No preferential treatment, No reason for concern. Just casual chit-chat with the Proctor family on, Arrest Day, Arraignment DayInterview Day Sure. Totally normal. Why is the family of people who were at 34 Fairview BEFORE the discovery of the body… on the phone with the Proctor family more than ANY other witnesses in the entire case? And why does EVERY call line up with, The arrest, The arraignment and The interviews …if all they ever did was “go to a party and go home”?

On the VERY DAY Karen was arrested… Julie Albert spent 12 minutes on the phone with Courtney Proctor YOU KNOW… Trooper Michael Proctor’s sister. The sister of the lead investigator who had not even interviewed the Alberts yet. Twelve minutes… on arrest day. Let that marinate. ON FEBRUARY 2, 2022 THE DAY OF KAREN’S ARRAIGNMENT Before 9 AM before Karen even walked into the courtroom Julie Albert has THREE MORE CALLS with Courtney Proctor. What could they possibly be talking about that morning? Brunch plans? Yoga classes? Or maybe… the arraignment Karen Read??? At 10:58 AM THERE IS A 27 MINUTE CALL A nearly half-hour conversation with the lead investigator’s sister after the arraignment. Gee, I wonder what they discussed, The weather? The Patriots? Or maybe… the arraignment that had literally just happened? This is not normal. This is not random. This is access. THEN 13 days after John O’Keefe died…Julie and Chris Albert were finally interviewed. AT 5:30 PM But get this, They were interviewed together, not separately. They were interviewed in their home, not at a station. They were interviewed without Colin present, So the concerned mother brings… Not Colin. Just herself. And sits next to her husband while they give a joint story. This is not how serious homicide investigations usually work. Unless the goal is not clarity… but containment. Right after their interview ends, Julie calls Trooper Proctor’s personal cellphone for 5 seconds (a “call me back” ping) then at 6:21 Proctor calls her back for 4 minutes, because apparently the lead investigator needed a quick check-in with a family whose son was at 34 Fairview minutes before a man was found dying in the snow and he had just interviewed her moments earlier! But they want you to believe they had No special access, No coaching No “off the books” conversations, No preferential treatment, No reason for concern. Just casual chit-chat with the Proctor family on, Arrest Day, Arraignment DayInterview Day Sure. Totally normal. Why is the family of people who were at 34 Fairview BEFORE the discovery of the body… on the phone with the Proctor family more than ANY other witnesses in the entire case? And why does EVERY call line up with, The arrest, The arraignment and The interviews …if all they ever did was “go to a party and go home”?

Dixie Normus

93,051 次观看 • 8 个月前

For years now, we've listened to Karen Read's supporters repeat the claim that Michael Proctor said, "pin it on the girl," treating it as some smoking gun of alleged corruption in the investigation despite there never being any evidence that Michael Proctor ever uttered those words. That phrase entered the conversation because Alan Jackson used it in court. From there, it was repeated so many times that people began treating it as an actual quote from law enforcement rather than what it really was: a phrase coined by Karen Read's own attorney. Now, thanks to Karen Read's civil team once again attempting to use "pin it on the girl" as evidence of supposed "corruption," we finally have clarity ON THE RECORD. Judge Gildea demanded that they identify the source of the quote because they had the audacity to include it in a filing without attributing it to anyone. When pressed to identify who actually said it, their answer wasn't Michael Proctor. It wasn't any member of the Massachusetts State Police. It wasn't anyone from Canton PD. IT WAS KAREN READ'S OWN DEFENSE COUNSEL as we've been saying all along. "Lies have momentum but the truth will always come to light." — Unknown

For years now, we've listened to Karen Read's supporters repeat the claim that Michael Proctor said, "pin it on the girl," treating it as some smoking gun of alleged corruption in the investigation despite there never being any evidence that Michael Proctor ever uttered those words. That phrase entered the conversation because Alan Jackson used it in court. From there, it was repeated so many times that people began treating it as an actual quote from law enforcement rather than what it really was: a phrase coined by Karen Read's own attorney. Now, thanks to Karen Read's civil team once again attempting to use "pin it on the girl" as evidence of supposed "corruption," we finally have clarity ON THE RECORD. Judge Gildea demanded that they identify the source of the quote because they had the audacity to include it in a filing without attributing it to anyone. When pressed to identify who actually said it, their answer wasn't Michael Proctor. It wasn't any member of the Massachusetts State Police. It wasn't anyone from Canton PD. IT WAS KAREN READ'S OWN DEFENSE COUNSEL as we've been saying all along. "Lies have momentum but the truth will always come to light." — Unknown

Jamz

17,713 次观看 • 1 个月前

Did Proctor just admit to a dirty investigation? Last night on 20/20, Proctor said the moment he knew John was hit by Karen's SUV was at the hospital when he saw that John only had on one shoe. He knows from experience that if the other shoe is on the street, that is likely the point of impact, meaning he was hit by a car on the street. The problem with that statement is that Michael Proctor went to the hospital to see John at 1pm. At that time, he had not yet visited the crime scene. He had no idea where the other shoe was, and for all he knew, the shoe was inside the house. He then had Karen's SUV towed from Dighton at 4:30pm. The other shoe wasn't found on the street until 6pm by the SERT team. So, he knew at 1pm that at 6 pm, they would find the other shoe on the street, amd he should have Karen's SUV towed an hour and a half earlier so they have the vehicle in custody??? OK, got it.

Did Proctor just admit to a dirty investigation? Last night on 20/20, Proctor said the moment he knew John was hit by Karen's SUV was at the hospital when he saw that John only had on one shoe. He knows from experience that if the other shoe is on the street, that is likely the point of impact, meaning he was hit by a car on the street. The problem with that statement is that Michael Proctor went to the hospital to see John at 1pm. At that time, he had not yet visited the crime scene. He had no idea where the other shoe was, and for all he knew, the shoe was inside the house. He then had Karen's SUV towed from Dighton at 4:30pm. The other shoe wasn't found on the street until 6pm by the SERT team. So, he knew at 1pm that at 6 pm, they would find the other shoe on the street, amd he should have Karen's SUV towed an hour and a half earlier so they have the vehicle in custody??? OK, got it.

TinyElvis

121,318 次观看 • 1 年前

Do we have documents showing Brian Albert perjured himself, or that MSP knew he destroyed evidence? Sept 22 - Preservation order discussed in open court and so ordered (we know Brian watched) Brian later testified this was the day he got rid of his phone on the Sept 22 Sept 28 - Proctor talked with Brian Albert who said he was pissed odd, frustrated, concerned about his phone (bc it contained work info… which apparently didn’t matter enough to not destroy it)

Do we have documents showing Brian Albert perjured himself, or that MSP knew he destroyed evidence? Sept 22 - Preservation order discussed in open court and so ordered (we know Brian watched) Brian later testified this was the day he got rid of his phone on the Sept 22 Sept 28 - Proctor talked with Brian Albert who said he was pissed odd, frustrated, concerned about his phone (bc it contained work info… which apparently didn’t matter enough to not destroy it)

Brooklyn James

17,097 次观看 • 1 个月前

Mark Bederow’s very first footnote in this week’s filing is putting everyone on notice that despite all the noise about Michael Proctor as of late, we still have not forgotten about Yuri Bukhenik. We have not forgotten about the Rubber Duck scandal of Canton. We have not forgotten that Bukhenik showed up at the homes of multiple women to threaten them with arrest and criminal charges for their speech on social media. Bukhenik’s abuse of power deserves the same amount of scrutiny as Proctor’s does, especially when looking at his actions through the lens of the First Amendment. Putting aside the Karen Read case entirely, Bukhenik had just as much of a part as Proctor did in the specific targeting against Aidan Kearney, who currently faces every indictment for which the Norfolk County DA’s office can attempt to justify. Despite anyone’s claims, Bukhenik and Proctor are the left and right hand of the same body. Bukhenik played an active role in a portion of the damning texts that have been uncovered from Proctor’s cell phone. He also said anything he needed to (whether true or otherwise) to protect Proctor on the witness stand. Was Bukhenik’s sworn statement that Proctor operated with “honor and integrity” purely motivated by the protection of Michael Proctor, or was it, in part, to shield himself? To repeat some of Mr. Bederow’s “free legal advice” toward anyone associated with Proctor’s abysmal conduct (from Justice Served): GET AHEAD OF IT, DO THE RIGHT THING, AND COME CLEAN. ☀️ The public should not feel that the biggest threat to their communities comes from the same people who have sworn to serve & protect them. It is well past time to find out just how deep the scandal of the Norfolk County DA’s office goes.

Mark Bederow’s very first footnote in this week’s filing is putting everyone on notice that despite all the noise about Michael Proctor as of late, we still have not forgotten about Yuri Bukhenik. We have not forgotten about the Rubber Duck scandal of Canton. We have not forgotten that Bukhenik showed up at the homes of multiple women to threaten them with arrest and criminal charges for their speech on social media. Bukhenik’s abuse of power deserves the same amount of scrutiny as Proctor’s does, especially when looking at his actions through the lens of the First Amendment. Putting aside the Karen Read case entirely, Bukhenik had just as much of a part as Proctor did in the specific targeting against Aidan Kearney, who currently faces every indictment for which the Norfolk County DA’s office can attempt to justify. Despite anyone’s claims, Bukhenik and Proctor are the left and right hand of the same body. Bukhenik played an active role in a portion of the damning texts that have been uncovered from Proctor’s cell phone. He also said anything he needed to (whether true or otherwise) to protect Proctor on the witness stand. Was Bukhenik’s sworn statement that Proctor operated with “honor and integrity” purely motivated by the protection of Michael Proctor, or was it, in part, to shield himself? To repeat some of Mr. Bederow’s “free legal advice” toward anyone associated with Proctor’s abysmal conduct (from Justice Served): GET AHEAD OF IT, DO THE RIGHT THING, AND COME CLEAN. ☀️ The public should not feel that the biggest threat to their communities comes from the same people who have sworn to serve & protect them. It is well past time to find out just how deep the scandal of the Norfolk County DA’s office goes.

Britt Happens

35,332 次观看 • 1 个月前