Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Mark Bederow’s very first footnote in this week’s filing is putting everyone on notice that despite all the noise about Michael Proctor as of late, we still have not forgotten about Yuri Bukhenik. We have not forgotten about the Rubber Duck scandal of Canton. We have not forgotten that...

BrittHapp3ns's profile picture

Britt Happens

3,239 subscribers

35,332 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNachrichten & PolitikBildung
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Listen to what Rosemary Scapiccio says here…⬇️ Before she ever received information from his phone, Proctor was allowed to go through the phone for “privileged” material “with his wife.” Then, prior to being turned over to Rosemary Scapicchio, the Norfolk DA’s office ran another search on the phone for other privileged material. That means that Michael Proctor was the FIRST POINT OF FILTRATION before handing it off to the same DA who had already spent years protecting him. ❌ This reminds me of when Jen McCabe was allowed to quickly delete messages (if it really is just messages) that SHE deemed to be private before turning it in when Karen Read was being investigated/prosecuted. What if Brian Walshe was allowed to pick through his own phone before giving it to investigators? What else has Proctor said about Aidan Kearney, for that matter? What is the purpose of data collection if you allow the person under the microscope to remove what he pleases before “opening the kimono?” What did Proctor remove from his device? And furthermore, what did the Norfolk Coumty DA’s office sift out of it? We need full transparency at this point, and not just with Proctor. We need to know who else in the MSP has abused their power, and what defendants/convicts have been railroaded in the process.
0:39

Listen to what Rosemary Scapiccio says here…⬇️ Before she ever received information from his phone, Proctor was allowed to go through the phone for “privileged” material “with his wife.” Then, prior to being turned over to Rosemary Scapicchio, the Norfolk DA’s office ran another search on the phone for other privileged material. That means that Michael Proctor was the FIRST POINT OF FILTRATION before handing it off to the same DA who had already spent years protecting him. ❌ This reminds me of when Jen McCabe was allowed to quickly delete messages (if it really is just messages) that SHE deemed to be private before turning it in when Karen Read was being investigated/prosecuted. What if Brian Walshe was allowed to pick through his own phone before giving it to investigators? What else has Proctor said about Aidan Kearney, for that matter? What is the purpose of data collection if you allow the person under the microscope to remove what he pleases before “opening the kimono?” What did Proctor remove from his device? And furthermore, what did the Norfolk Coumty DA’s office sift out of it? We need full transparency at this point, and not just with Proctor. We need to know who else in the MSP has abused their power, and what defendants/convicts have been railroaded in the process.

Britt Happens

18,577 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Catching up on testimony & have a bunch of backlogged posts coming ASAP! “#KarenRead’s not being framed! That’s just a fanciful conspiracy!” ADA Adam Lally & DA Michael Morrissey’s Office committed fraud on the Court to admit false evidence—that appears to be doctored—through its witness, Yuri Bukhenik, arguably via suborning perjury. That evidence appears to be doctored specifically to remove from view the part of the vehicle at issue—the right taillight, and what the conflicted Lead Investigator at issue—Michael Proctor—was doing around it. It’s also purported to show Karen Read’s right taillight arriving with damage, which is interesting given we now know it was actually the undamaged left taillight in view. This then begs the question of how they got an undamaged taillight to look damaged in their already verifiably doctored footage. 🤔 This was a desperate attempt to assuage the concerns about what nefarious activity the conflicted Lead Investigator, Michael Proctor, was engaging in as it relates to Read’s right taillight—both of which were conveniently kept out of view in this video. This makes it all the more confounding how Yuri Bukhenik could testify to what Trooper Proctor was doing given you can’t see in the video, and Yuri doesn’t have any first hand knowledge as he wasn’t there next to Proctor the entire time. If anyone had any doubt in their mind about the veracity of #KarenRead’s well-substantiated third-party culprit defense theory, ADA Adam Lally & DA Michael Morrissey’s Office swiftly removed that today when they exposed themselves as frauds who are willing to purposely deceive a jury, the Court, and the public in order to achieve a desired outcome. If this were an honest prosecution, and the DA’s Office were prosecuting the right person(s), then why would they offer false evidence that appears to be doctored, and admit it through suborning perjury from a Police Officer witness—suggesting, at the very least, collusion between State Police Investigators and the Norfolk County DA’s Office? ADA Lally & DA Morrissey’s Office have definitively removed any & all doubt that they are corrupt and complicit in covering up a murder & aiding the criminals to frame Karen Read. Yuri Bukhenik, a Massachusetts State Police Investigator also seemingly confirmed he is corrupt & complicit when he misrepresented this video evidence through testimony in a concerted effort with ADA Lally to deceive the jury in the same way, by misleading them to believe they were viewing the taillight at issue on Karen Read’s car. They produced evidence—surveillance video of the CPD Sallyport garage—that was doctored, and then they knowingly attempted to perpetuate this fraud upon the Court, deliberately trying to mislead the Court & the jury to believe they’d presented an honest & true version of that footage. Specifically, this fraud on Judge Cannone’s Court was even further perpetuated arguably through suborning perjury through the witness, Trooper Yuri Bukhenik, who went as far as giving the detail of what side the driveway entering into the Sallyport (from outside the garage door) was on—information that would also be a lie when looking at a “mirror-imaged” video—in an attempt to mislead the jury into believing that the video was an accurate reflection of the garage and the orientation of everything contained therein. This is despicable. Anyone following & watching the trial at home quickly noticed when this video was first shown that something was off—it looked like it was a “mirror image” of the original given the orientation of things, and lettering on the walls being backwards, for instance. The jury was probably perplexed by this, particularly after ADA Lally admitted it as a true and accurate version of the evidence—which it’s clearly not, thus explaining certain oddities like how the driver appeared to exit the vehicle from the passenger side. This is outrageous! We are outraged! #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead
0:39

Catching up on testimony & have a bunch of backlogged posts coming ASAP! “#KarenRead’s not being framed! That’s just a fanciful conspiracy!” ADA Adam Lally & DA Michael Morrissey’s Office committed fraud on the Court to admit false evidence—that appears to be doctored—through its witness, Yuri Bukhenik, arguably via suborning perjury. That evidence appears to be doctored specifically to remove from view the part of the vehicle at issue—the right taillight, and what the conflicted Lead Investigator at issue—Michael Proctor—was doing around it. It’s also purported to show Karen Read’s right taillight arriving with damage, which is interesting given we now know it was actually the undamaged left taillight in view. This then begs the question of how they got an undamaged taillight to look damaged in their already verifiably doctored footage. 🤔 This was a desperate attempt to assuage the concerns about what nefarious activity the conflicted Lead Investigator, Michael Proctor, was engaging in as it relates to Read’s right taillight—both of which were conveniently kept out of view in this video. This makes it all the more confounding how Yuri Bukhenik could testify to what Trooper Proctor was doing given you can’t see in the video, and Yuri doesn’t have any first hand knowledge as he wasn’t there next to Proctor the entire time. If anyone had any doubt in their mind about the veracity of #KarenRead’s well-substantiated third-party culprit defense theory, ADA Adam Lally & DA Michael Morrissey’s Office swiftly removed that today when they exposed themselves as frauds who are willing to purposely deceive a jury, the Court, and the public in order to achieve a desired outcome. If this were an honest prosecution, and the DA’s Office were prosecuting the right person(s), then why would they offer false evidence that appears to be doctored, and admit it through suborning perjury from a Police Officer witness—suggesting, at the very least, collusion between State Police Investigators and the Norfolk County DA’s Office? ADA Lally & DA Morrissey’s Office have definitively removed any & all doubt that they are corrupt and complicit in covering up a murder & aiding the criminals to frame Karen Read. Yuri Bukhenik, a Massachusetts State Police Investigator also seemingly confirmed he is corrupt & complicit when he misrepresented this video evidence through testimony in a concerted effort with ADA Lally to deceive the jury in the same way, by misleading them to believe they were viewing the taillight at issue on Karen Read’s car. They produced evidence—surveillance video of the CPD Sallyport garage—that was doctored, and then they knowingly attempted to perpetuate this fraud upon the Court, deliberately trying to mislead the Court & the jury to believe they’d presented an honest & true version of that footage. Specifically, this fraud on Judge Cannone’s Court was even further perpetuated arguably through suborning perjury through the witness, Trooper Yuri Bukhenik, who went as far as giving the detail of what side the driveway entering into the Sallyport (from outside the garage door) was on—information that would also be a lie when looking at a “mirror-imaged” video—in an attempt to mislead the jury into believing that the video was an accurate reflection of the garage and the orientation of everything contained therein. This is despicable. Anyone following & watching the trial at home quickly noticed when this video was first shown that something was off—it looked like it was a “mirror image” of the original given the orientation of things, and lettering on the walls being backwards, for instance. The jury was probably perplexed by this, particularly after ADA Lally admitted it as a true and accurate version of the evidence—which it’s clearly not, thus explaining certain oddities like how the driver appeared to exit the vehicle from the passenger side. This is outrageous! We are outraged! #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

111,603 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

If DA Michael Morrissey’s Office thought calling Trooper Yuri Bukhenik over its Lead Investigator, Michael Proctor, was a wise decision, can you even imagine how bad Trooper Proctor must be then? #KarenReadTrial “I’m not Trooper Proctor” —Yuri Bukhenik In an impressively artful moment, Attorney Alan Jackson gets Yuri Bukhenik to remind us all that he is not the Lead Investigator, Michael Proctor. Where is their Lead Investigator, Trooper Michael Proctor? What are they hiding? Why are they hiding him? - Going into 7th week of trial - Still no crimes proven - No cause of death - No accident reconstruction - Multiple doctored/lost/destroyed surveillance videos - LOTS of evidence of a coverup Do legitimate prosecutions, motivated by the pursuit of justice, hide witnesses? If the Commonwealth doesn’t call its Lead Investigator on a murder investigation, THAT’S REASONABLE DOUBT. 👇🏼SEE the clip: the closed captioning/subtitles wanted to take some creative liberty 😉🤷🏻‍♀️ #KarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead
0:23

If DA Michael Morrissey’s Office thought calling Trooper Yuri Bukhenik over its Lead Investigator, Michael Proctor, was a wise decision, can you even imagine how bad Trooper Proctor must be then? #KarenReadTrial “I’m not Trooper Proctor” —Yuri Bukhenik In an impressively artful moment, Attorney Alan Jackson gets Yuri Bukhenik to remind us all that he is not the Lead Investigator, Michael Proctor. Where is their Lead Investigator, Trooper Michael Proctor? What are they hiding? Why are they hiding him? - Going into 7th week of trial - Still no crimes proven - No cause of death - No accident reconstruction - Multiple doctored/lost/destroyed surveillance videos - LOTS of evidence of a coverup Do legitimate prosecutions, motivated by the pursuit of justice, hide witnesses? If the Commonwealth doesn’t call its Lead Investigator on a murder investigation, THAT’S REASONABLE DOUBT. 👇🏼SEE the clip: the closed captioning/subtitles wanted to take some creative liberty 😉🤷🏻‍♀️ #KarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

121,332 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Why is ADA Adam Lally so fixated on the time 8:22am, and specifically where Sergeant Yuri Bukhenik & Lead Investigator Michael Proctor were at 8:22am on January 29, 2022, and what they were doing at that time? Lally asks Bukhenik & Proctor: “Whereabouts were you at about 8:22 in the morning?” (see replies below) ——— BUKHENIK REPLIES: “At 8:22am, I would say I was still blowing the snow out of my driveway, clearing the path for my truck to leave the driveway.” ——— PROCTOR REPLIES: “Home.” LALLY ASKS: “Had you shoveled out of your driveway at that time?” PROCTOR REPLIES: “Not yet.” LALLY ASKS: “Um, had you cleaned off your car at that time?” PROCTOR REPLIES: “No.” ——— Lally then proceeds to ask both Yuri and Proctor about arriving at the Canton Police Department, who was there in the parking lot first, etc. ——— When ADA Lally was about to ask Bukhenik this oddly specific 8:22am whereabouts question, he initially starts out saying “And sir, when you arrived, so at approximately 8:22 in the morning or so…” almost as if he’d remembered he was supposed to get something important in about 8:22am BEFORE asking Yuri or Proctor about when they arrived at the Canton Police Department. We’ve never heard anything whatsoever about either 8:22am OR about Yuri or Proctor allegedly at home shoveling/snow blowing/removing. Additionally, having looked back at all of the known timestamp data and timeline pertaining to this case, there wasn’t anything I could find that happened at 8:22am on January 29, 2022. 8:22am is an oddly specific time. If ADA Lally simply wanted to establish that these guys had not yet shoveled out their driveways at that time, were shoveling their driveways at that time/after being notified around 6:40am but prior to going to the Canton Police Department, wouldn’t he be more broad/vague? “What were you doing around 8 or 8:30am?” for instance? Particularly given this was elicited during direct examination…in other words, asking a witness on direct what they were doing at 8:22am is semi-leading the witness with that specific timestamp. But also, isn’t it odd for these witnesses to know down to the minute that at 8:22am, that was precisely when they started shoveling out their driveways? Or whether they’d began shoveling out their driveways yet at that precise time or not? Wouldn’t the more natural response to that question be something along the lines of “I don’t remember exactly what time I began or finished shoveling, but it was the last thing I did before I left the house to go to CPD, and I know I arrived at CPD around 9am” for example? 8:22am is not a time that, based on prior testimony and evidence, holds any significance. But clearly, now it does. Why is that? Why was it of enough importance for Lally to remember he needed to establish that both of those witnesses were at their homes at that time, and not elsewhere? What’s interesting is that Lally asks Yuri what he was doing at 8:22am, and Yuri responds he was snow blowing then. But for Proctor, Lally asks where he was at 8:22am, to which Proctor simply replies “home”. Lally then follows up to ask Proctor if he’d begun shoveling or clearing off his car then, to which he says “not yet” and “no”. So clearly it was important to establish that both Yuri Bukhenik & Michael Proctor hadn’t shoveled out their driveways yet, hadn’t left their homes yet, and were nowhere else but their homes at 8:22am. Why does this matter? Also, if Yuri and Proctor were notified around 6:40am of a situation they’d have to respond to, why did they wait nearly 2 hours before beginning to shovel their driveways? I’m not saying it was an attempt at an alibi, but certainly it was significant enough for Lally to be sure to establish that at precisely that exact moment in time, Yuri & Proctor weren’t somewhere else. What say you? #KarenReadTrial #KarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption
0:33

Why is ADA Adam Lally so fixated on the time 8:22am, and specifically where Sergeant Yuri Bukhenik & Lead Investigator Michael Proctor were at 8:22am on January 29, 2022, and what they were doing at that time? Lally asks Bukhenik & Proctor: “Whereabouts were you at about 8:22 in the morning?” (see replies below) ——— BUKHENIK REPLIES: “At 8:22am, I would say I was still blowing the snow out of my driveway, clearing the path for my truck to leave the driveway.” ——— PROCTOR REPLIES: “Home.” LALLY ASKS: “Had you shoveled out of your driveway at that time?” PROCTOR REPLIES: “Not yet.” LALLY ASKS: “Um, had you cleaned off your car at that time?” PROCTOR REPLIES: “No.” ——— Lally then proceeds to ask both Yuri and Proctor about arriving at the Canton Police Department, who was there in the parking lot first, etc. ——— When ADA Lally was about to ask Bukhenik this oddly specific 8:22am whereabouts question, he initially starts out saying “And sir, when you arrived, so at approximately 8:22 in the morning or so…” almost as if he’d remembered he was supposed to get something important in about 8:22am BEFORE asking Yuri or Proctor about when they arrived at the Canton Police Department. We’ve never heard anything whatsoever about either 8:22am OR about Yuri or Proctor allegedly at home shoveling/snow blowing/removing. Additionally, having looked back at all of the known timestamp data and timeline pertaining to this case, there wasn’t anything I could find that happened at 8:22am on January 29, 2022. 8:22am is an oddly specific time. If ADA Lally simply wanted to establish that these guys had not yet shoveled out their driveways at that time, were shoveling their driveways at that time/after being notified around 6:40am but prior to going to the Canton Police Department, wouldn’t he be more broad/vague? “What were you doing around 8 or 8:30am?” for instance? Particularly given this was elicited during direct examination…in other words, asking a witness on direct what they were doing at 8:22am is semi-leading the witness with that specific timestamp. But also, isn’t it odd for these witnesses to know down to the minute that at 8:22am, that was precisely when they started shoveling out their driveways? Or whether they’d began shoveling out their driveways yet at that precise time or not? Wouldn’t the more natural response to that question be something along the lines of “I don’t remember exactly what time I began or finished shoveling, but it was the last thing I did before I left the house to go to CPD, and I know I arrived at CPD around 9am” for example? 8:22am is not a time that, based on prior testimony and evidence, holds any significance. But clearly, now it does. Why is that? Why was it of enough importance for Lally to remember he needed to establish that both of those witnesses were at their homes at that time, and not elsewhere? What’s interesting is that Lally asks Yuri what he was doing at 8:22am, and Yuri responds he was snow blowing then. But for Proctor, Lally asks where he was at 8:22am, to which Proctor simply replies “home”. Lally then follows up to ask Proctor if he’d begun shoveling or clearing off his car then, to which he says “not yet” and “no”. So clearly it was important to establish that both Yuri Bukhenik & Michael Proctor hadn’t shoveled out their driveways yet, hadn’t left their homes yet, and were nowhere else but their homes at 8:22am. Why does this matter? Also, if Yuri and Proctor were notified around 6:40am of a situation they’d have to respond to, why did they wait nearly 2 hours before beginning to shovel their driveways? I’m not saying it was an attempt at an alibi, but certainly it was significant enough for Lally to be sure to establish that at precisely that exact moment in time, Yuri & Proctor weren’t somewhere else. What say you? #KarenReadTrial #KarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

195,996 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

In yet another instance of stunning dishonesty, Aidan Kearney goes on his new cohort, Grant Ellis Smith's, Spaces to spread his propaganda and disinformation. Yesterday, protected discovery that Aidan Kearney freely admits he shared with at least one person outside his legal team found its way onto this platform. In the past few weeks, protected discovery has routinely been leaked here. The message was from Michael Proctor. In it, Proctor is upset at the harassment being directed toward the witnesses, specifically Colin Albert, and himself. Proctor claims Kearney posted a video of Proctor changing his infant son's diaper. Seconds before showing the video, Kearney had leaked Colin Albert's cell phone number to his audience. He had also published several threats to Colin before this date, including telling the young man he would disrupt all of his football games and practices. Last night Kearney blatantly lied about the publishing of the video in hopes to get his demented followers to believe Proctor and MSP were framing him. Left is Kearney lying, right is Kearney publishing said video in a live 5 days before Proctor sent message as well as the leaked protected discovery message.
0:47

In yet another instance of stunning dishonesty, Aidan Kearney goes on his new cohort, Grant Ellis Smith's, Spaces to spread his propaganda and disinformation. Yesterday, protected discovery that Aidan Kearney freely admits he shared with at least one person outside his legal team found its way onto this platform. In the past few weeks, protected discovery has routinely been leaked here. The message was from Michael Proctor. In it, Proctor is upset at the harassment being directed toward the witnesses, specifically Colin Albert, and himself. Proctor claims Kearney posted a video of Proctor changing his infant son's diaper. Seconds before showing the video, Kearney had leaked Colin Albert's cell phone number to his audience. He had also published several threats to Colin before this date, including telling the young man he would disrupt all of his football games and practices. Last night Kearney blatantly lied about the publishing of the video in hopes to get his demented followers to believe Proctor and MSP were framing him. Left is Kearney lying, right is Kearney publishing said video in a live 5 days before Proctor sent message as well as the leaked protected discovery message.

Julie Carpenter

13,745 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Why is Michael Proctor still employed by the Massachusetts State Police? Why is his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, commenting on an open investigation he’s involved in and heavily conflicted on? Why does Elizabeth Proctor—someone who doesn’t, nor did she ever, know #KarenRead have such illogical animus toward her when it was her own husband whose conduct was reprehensible & created all of the problems in this case? Yet she “fully supports” her husband? 😂 Why does Elizabeth Proctor clearly appear to have a personal stake in the outcome of this case, or Karen Read being found guilty when she says “Karen Read is a murderer”? It’s no wonder Michael Proctor felt so comfortable to say and do such immoral and unethical things in this case. His own wife emboldens him! Have these people no shame? It is because of Michael Proctor and HIS actions that Officer #JohnOKeefe will never get proper justice, but apparently Michael and Elizabeth Proctor are the victims. QUESTION: Do you feel safer knowing Michael Proctor is a State Police Officer? #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption
0:55

Why is Michael Proctor still employed by the Massachusetts State Police? Why is his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, commenting on an open investigation he’s involved in and heavily conflicted on? Why does Elizabeth Proctor—someone who doesn’t, nor did she ever, know #KarenRead have such illogical animus toward her when it was her own husband whose conduct was reprehensible & created all of the problems in this case? Yet she “fully supports” her husband? 😂 Why does Elizabeth Proctor clearly appear to have a personal stake in the outcome of this case, or Karen Read being found guilty when she says “Karen Read is a murderer”? It’s no wonder Michael Proctor felt so comfortable to say and do such immoral and unethical things in this case. His own wife emboldens him! Have these people no shame? It is because of Michael Proctor and HIS actions that Officer #JohnOKeefe will never get proper justice, but apparently Michael and Elizabeth Proctor are the victims. QUESTION: Do you feel safer knowing Michael Proctor is a State Police Officer? #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

160,413 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

In today's Karen Read hearing, Michael Proctor's attorney CONFIRMED everything we knew was on his new phone extraction.. essentially his attorney pled, “yes the phone is bad… but please don’t let her see HOW bad.” Proctor’s attorney said on the record that this 13-year phone dump contains: 🔹️Photos of intimate body parts 🔹️Images of people not involved in anything 🔹️Names of sexual assault victims 🔹️A whole lot of deeply personal material And then (I kid you not) he tells the judge to “assume” there might be ✨️homophobic texts✨️ … and “assume” there could be ✨️antisemitic messages✨️ from years ago. Sir… WHY are those your go-to examples unless that’s exactly what’s in there? 🗣🗣🗣 He continued his argument that none of it is relevant because Proctor didn’t meet Karen until January 29th, 2022 (the day John O'Keefe was murdered) and called this a “fishing expedition.” He also said this is “just a civil case” where no one is going to jail and no constitutional rights are at issue. (Meanwhile Karen is literally suing him for violating her constitutional rights.) They tried the classic, “she already got 38,707 pages of discovery.” 🙄 From a DIFFERENT phone. Before the mistrial. Before the second trial. Before all the new chaos. And then tried to tell the court that this was the improper venue and to request discovery directly from Proctor himself. The issue? Read's team has already tried that, hence filing in these other cases to force the hand of the DA's office to hand it over because Proctor has since lost that very cell phone. So no, she cannot just subpoena him directly. The ONLY copy left is with the Commonwealth. The same people fighting to keep it sealed. Multiple other defendants from Proctor cases already got this extraction. But Karen Read? Nope. The DA's office protecting Proctor (still) is no surprise but his attorney confirming to the public that yes, he is in fact a piece of shit? Priceless. 👩‍🍳💋
4:10

In today's Karen Read hearing, Michael Proctor's attorney CONFIRMED everything we knew was on his new phone extraction.. essentially his attorney pled, “yes the phone is bad… but please don’t let her see HOW bad.” Proctor’s attorney said on the record that this 13-year phone dump contains: 🔹️Photos of intimate body parts 🔹️Images of people not involved in anything 🔹️Names of sexual assault victims 🔹️A whole lot of deeply personal material And then (I kid you not) he tells the judge to “assume” there might be ✨️homophobic texts✨️ … and “assume” there could be ✨️antisemitic messages✨️ from years ago. Sir… WHY are those your go-to examples unless that’s exactly what’s in there? 🗣🗣🗣 He continued his argument that none of it is relevant because Proctor didn’t meet Karen until January 29th, 2022 (the day John O'Keefe was murdered) and called this a “fishing expedition.” He also said this is “just a civil case” where no one is going to jail and no constitutional rights are at issue. (Meanwhile Karen is literally suing him for violating her constitutional rights.) They tried the classic, “she already got 38,707 pages of discovery.” 🙄 From a DIFFERENT phone. Before the mistrial. Before the second trial. Before all the new chaos. And then tried to tell the court that this was the improper venue and to request discovery directly from Proctor himself. The issue? Read's team has already tried that, hence filing in these other cases to force the hand of the DA's office to hand it over because Proctor has since lost that very cell phone. So no, she cannot just subpoena him directly. The ONLY copy left is with the Commonwealth. The same people fighting to keep it sealed. Multiple other defendants from Proctor cases already got this extraction. But Karen Read? Nope. The DA's office protecting Proctor (still) is no surprise but his attorney confirming to the public that yes, he is in fact a piece of shit? Priceless. 👩‍🍳💋

BoozeyBeauty

114,191 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

NEW: The Proctorgate files continue to expand to SnapChat, and Michael Proctor's lawyer accused Karen Read's legal team of engaging in "defamation" by revealing Proctor and Sean Goode's horrifying text messages in a court filing last week, during a hearing before Judge Doolin Thursday on the Myles King docket in Norfolk Superior Court. Proctor's lawyer, during the hearing, argued that Proctor's Snapchat and text messages should not be made public. That resulted in this reporter saying, in real time; Wait, Michael Proctor had a Snapchat!?!?! Proctor's lawyer then referenced Karen's case filed last week in Bristol county (Proctorgate). Proctor's lawyer says he realizes the cat is out of the bad but implores Judge that we are talking about "Michael Proctor's privacy, who has spent years helping victims. He has never been indicted. He has never been arrested. He has never had his bail revoked. I would suggest Proctor has a legitimate privacy interest in these Snapchat messages." Proctor's lawyer wants the Norfolk D.A. to orally tell the defendants about Proctor's Snapchat messages. Proctor's lawyer then told Judge Doolin that Karen's lawsuit involving the Proctorgate files was intended to defame and embarrass Michael Proctor and, in turn, Proctor's lawyer asks Judge Doolin to keep Proctor's Snapchat messages public. Those were Proctor's own words (I said out loud). Rosemary Scapichhhio, the lawyer for Myles King, then said that Proctor has no standing in this case. Proctor is just an agent of the Commonwealth, says Scapichhhio, and it makes no sense to keep this material sealed when the Proctorgate messages are already starting to come out into the public. "I can't, for the life of me, understand how Proctor even has standing to come before the court," Scapichhhio said. Judge Doolin then said he will have a ruling "for ya' shortly." King, for his part, in currently in federal prison after he was charged by the DOJ last month for drug trafficking (a move that many suspect was designed to remove Proctor from King's cases). Read more about Proctorgate here -
9:43

NEW: The Proctorgate files continue to expand to SnapChat, and Michael Proctor's lawyer accused Karen Read's legal team of engaging in "defamation" by revealing Proctor and Sean Goode's horrifying text messages in a court filing last week, during a hearing before Judge Doolin Thursday on the Myles King docket in Norfolk Superior Court. Proctor's lawyer, during the hearing, argued that Proctor's Snapchat and text messages should not be made public. That resulted in this reporter saying, in real time; Wait, Michael Proctor had a Snapchat!?!?! Proctor's lawyer then referenced Karen's case filed last week in Bristol county (Proctorgate). Proctor's lawyer says he realizes the cat is out of the bad but implores Judge that we are talking about "Michael Proctor's privacy, who has spent years helping victims. He has never been indicted. He has never been arrested. He has never had his bail revoked. I would suggest Proctor has a legitimate privacy interest in these Snapchat messages." Proctor's lawyer wants the Norfolk D.A. to orally tell the defendants about Proctor's Snapchat messages. Proctor's lawyer then told Judge Doolin that Karen's lawsuit involving the Proctorgate files was intended to defame and embarrass Michael Proctor and, in turn, Proctor's lawyer asks Judge Doolin to keep Proctor's Snapchat messages public. Those were Proctor's own words (I said out loud). Rosemary Scapichhhio, the lawyer for Myles King, then said that Proctor has no standing in this case. Proctor is just an agent of the Commonwealth, says Scapichhhio, and it makes no sense to keep this material sealed when the Proctorgate messages are already starting to come out into the public. "I can't, for the life of me, understand how Proctor even has standing to come before the court," Scapichhhio said. Judge Doolin then said he will have a ruling "for ya' shortly." King, for his part, in currently in federal prison after he was charged by the DOJ last month for drug trafficking (a move that many suspect was designed to remove Proctor from King's cases). Read more about Proctorgate here -

Grant Smith Ellis

71,268 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Courtney Proctor said she and Michael “just didn’t talk about” the case. But on January 29, Michael texted her that the death was suspicious, told her not to tell anyone, identified Julie and Chris as witnesses, and said he needed to interview them. Then on February 1, before Proctor interviewed Julie and Chris, Courtney texted Michael that she was meeting with Julie. Later, Courtney claimed Michael did not even have Julie’s number and had to ask her for it “a few weeks into” the investigation. Michael was discussing Julie and Chris with Courtney on day one. Courtney was meeting with Julie before Michael interviewed her. Courtney and Julie communicated frequently. Yet we still do not have the communication showing who actually arranged the interview, how it was arranged, or when Proctor first contacted Julie and Chris. Courtney said they “didn’t talk about the case.” The texts say otherwise. And the missing communications trail sits directly between the investigator, his sister, and the witnesses he needed to interview. AND DONT FORGET, julie called Proctor just after their official interview, and he called her back and talked for 4 minutes
2:54

Sensitive content

Courtney Proctor said she and Michael “just didn’t talk about” the case. But on January 29, Michael texted her that the death was suspicious, told her not to tell anyone, identified Julie and Chris as witnesses, and said he needed to interview them. Then on February 1, before Proctor interviewed Julie and Chris, Courtney texted Michael that she was meeting with Julie. Later, Courtney claimed Michael did not even have Julie’s number and had to ask her for it “a few weeks into” the investigation. Michael was discussing Julie and Chris with Courtney on day one. Courtney was meeting with Julie before Michael interviewed her. Courtney and Julie communicated frequently. Yet we still do not have the communication showing who actually arranged the interview, how it was arranged, or when Proctor first contacted Julie and Chris. Courtney said they “didn’t talk about the case.” The texts say otherwise. And the missing communications trail sits directly between the investigator, his sister, and the witnesses he needed to interview. AND DONT FORGET, julie called Proctor just after their official interview, and he called her back and talked for 4 minutes

Dixie Normus

50,689 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

there is another important detail in Julie’s text thread that is easy to overlook. she never actually answered Michael Proctor’s question. Proctor told her that Colin’s attorney was not returning his calls. He asked Julie and Chris to speak with Colin and find out what day and time worked for another interview. Julie did not say she would ask Colin. She did not provide a date. She did not refer Proctor back to the attorney. She did not decline. Instead, she answered only the personal part “Same to you and E. It all really sucks. Hope the kids are doing good.” Proctor then gave that response a thumbs-up. So where is the rest of the conversation? How was Colin’s interview ultimately coordinated? Was it done over the phone, through Chris, through the attorney, or through messages that were no longer present? Because the one Proctor exchange investigators found on Julie’s phone contains a request, but no actual answer.
1:49

there is another important detail in Julie’s text thread that is easy to overlook. she never actually answered Michael Proctor’s question. Proctor told her that Colin’s attorney was not returning his calls. He asked Julie and Chris to speak with Colin and find out what day and time worked for another interview. Julie did not say she would ask Colin. She did not provide a date. She did not refer Proctor back to the attorney. She did not decline. Instead, she answered only the personal part “Same to you and E. It all really sucks. Hope the kids are doing good.” Proctor then gave that response a thumbs-up. So where is the rest of the conversation? How was Colin’s interview ultimately coordinated? Was it done over the phone, through Chris, through the attorney, or through messages that were no longer present? Because the one Proctor exchange investigators found on Julie’s phone contains a request, but no actual answer.

Dixie Normus

32,262 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

📌FOIA BOMBSHELL in Karen Read case Newly released cruiser GPS records from the February searches of 34 Fairview just blew a hole in the narrative. Bukhenik never testified to being at 34 Fairview on Feb 8, 11, or 18. The ONLY person who claimed those dates? Michael Proctor. So what are we supposed to believe? -He somehow conducted multiple searches in a personal vehicle while his cruiser sat at the DA’s office? -Or… those searches never happened at all? Because right now, the records and the testimony are not lining up. And that’s a problem. #KarenRead #FOIA #Accountability #TruthMatters
1:00

📌FOIA BOMBSHELL in Karen Read case Newly released cruiser GPS records from the February searches of 34 Fairview just blew a hole in the narrative. Bukhenik never testified to being at 34 Fairview on Feb 8, 11, or 18. The ONLY person who claimed those dates? Michael Proctor. So what are we supposed to believe? -He somehow conducted multiple searches in a personal vehicle while his cruiser sat at the DA’s office? -Or… those searches never happened at all? Because right now, the records and the testimony are not lining up. And that’s a problem. #KarenRead #FOIA #Accountability #TruthMatters

Kelly🍀💚

64,225 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

In most states, agencies like the State Police remain fully independent from the District Attorney’s Office and only collaborate with prosecutors on a case-by-case basis. By contrast, in Norfolk County, State Police detectives are formally embedded within the DA’s office and work under the DA’s direction on a daily basis. Michael Proctor is not only a complete and utter failure as a moral and ethical human being. He is an indictment of the Massachusetts State Police. AND he is a reflection of the Norfolk County District Attorney’s Office, one that can only be corrected with a complete overhaul in leadership. ADAM DEITCH FOR DA 🇺🇸
0:22

In most states, agencies like the State Police remain fully independent from the District Attorney’s Office and only collaborate with prosecutors on a case-by-case basis. By contrast, in Norfolk County, State Police detectives are formally embedded within the DA’s office and work under the DA’s direction on a daily basis. Michael Proctor is not only a complete and utter failure as a moral and ethical human being. He is an indictment of the Massachusetts State Police. AND he is a reflection of the Norfolk County District Attorney’s Office, one that can only be corrected with a complete overhaul in leadership. ADAM DEITCH FOR DA 🇺🇸

Emily See

10,883 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

For years now, we've listened to Karen Read's supporters repeat the claim that Michael Proctor said, "pin it on the girl," treating it as some smoking gun of alleged corruption in the investigation despite there never being any evidence that Michael Proctor ever uttered those words. That phrase entered the conversation because Alan Jackson used it in court. From there, it was repeated so many times that people began treating it as an actual quote from law enforcement rather than what it really was: a phrase coined by Karen Read's own attorney. Now, thanks to Karen Read's civil team once again attempting to use "pin it on the girl" as evidence of supposed "corruption," we finally have clarity ON THE RECORD. Judge Gildea demanded that they identify the source of the quote because they had the audacity to include it in a filing without attributing it to anyone. When pressed to identify who actually said it, their answer wasn't Michael Proctor. It wasn't any member of the Massachusetts State Police. It wasn't anyone from Canton PD. IT WAS KAREN READ'S OWN DEFENSE COUNSEL as we've been saying all along. "Lies have momentum but the truth will always come to light." — Unknown
0:19

For years now, we've listened to Karen Read's supporters repeat the claim that Michael Proctor said, "pin it on the girl," treating it as some smoking gun of alleged corruption in the investigation despite there never being any evidence that Michael Proctor ever uttered those words. That phrase entered the conversation because Alan Jackson used it in court. From there, it was repeated so many times that people began treating it as an actual quote from law enforcement rather than what it really was: a phrase coined by Karen Read's own attorney. Now, thanks to Karen Read's civil team once again attempting to use "pin it on the girl" as evidence of supposed "corruption," we finally have clarity ON THE RECORD. Judge Gildea demanded that they identify the source of the quote because they had the audacity to include it in a filing without attributing it to anyone. When pressed to identify who actually said it, their answer wasn't Michael Proctor. It wasn't any member of the Massachusetts State Police. It wasn't anyone from Canton PD. IT WAS KAREN READ'S OWN DEFENSE COUNSEL as we've been saying all along. "Lies have momentum but the truth will always come to light." — Unknown

Jamz

17,713 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

In a recent interview, Colonel Nobel of the Massachusetts State Police stated that public trust was compromised by Michael Proctor on a "personal level" and not on a "operational level". Let me be so ever-living clear about this: those of us in the state (and especially in Norfolk County) overwhelmingly do not have trust in the state police. The conversations I've had with the women in my life who are afraid of being around state police. My non-white friends who are nervous when they see a state cruiser. One of my black friends said that he "always makes sure his hands are on 10 and 2 when around staties". That we can't trust the cops to not treat innocent individuals with dignity or transparency. This isn't personal. This is systemic. It wasn't just the Karen Read trial. It was the investigation of the murder of John O'Keefe. Of Sandra Birchmore. Of Ana Walshe. When the system quietly disciplines officers like Buhkenik, Tully and DiCiccio. When the system promotes an officer like Kotkowski. When the system protects an officer like Fanning. When the system fights for the rights of Proctor.. this is why we don't trust you operationally. It's not over some taillight or texts, it's the community seeing the behavioral patterns as a whole. It should not take criminal activity by one officer, and a failed public relations campaign, for a colonel to recognize (and change) this.
0:58

In a recent interview, Colonel Nobel of the Massachusetts State Police stated that public trust was compromised by Michael Proctor on a "personal level" and not on a "operational level". Let me be so ever-living clear about this: those of us in the state (and especially in Norfolk County) overwhelmingly do not have trust in the state police. The conversations I've had with the women in my life who are afraid of being around state police. My non-white friends who are nervous when they see a state cruiser. One of my black friends said that he "always makes sure his hands are on 10 and 2 when around staties". That we can't trust the cops to not treat innocent individuals with dignity or transparency. This isn't personal. This is systemic. It wasn't just the Karen Read trial. It was the investigation of the murder of John O'Keefe. Of Sandra Birchmore. Of Ana Walshe. When the system quietly disciplines officers like Buhkenik, Tully and DiCiccio. When the system promotes an officer like Kotkowski. When the system protects an officer like Fanning. When the system fights for the rights of Proctor.. this is why we don't trust you operationally. It's not over some taillight or texts, it's the community seeing the behavioral patterns as a whole. It should not take criminal activity by one officer, and a failed public relations campaign, for a colonel to recognize (and change) this.

BoozeyBeauty

20,301 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Michael Proctor's new data extraction were confirmed to have racist and biased communications in them. Attorney Rosemary Scapicchio confirmed on 10/30/25: “If you’re already prejudiced to people because of the color of their skin, their ethnicity, if they’re a male or female, then you can’t have an open mind when you started this investigation.” Several other Norfolk County attorneys also were also able to receive this data extraction as Proctor investigated their clients cases. That being said, we also know the DA's office has them and most likely Massachusetts State Police. It's highly likely that Canton PD has parts of these communications considering Proctor was very friendly with several Canton officers. Proctor of course grew up and lives in town so his friendships with some of these individuals run decades long. I posted this video before the news of Canton PD Sgt Sean Goode had come out because I knew how entangled some of the Canton crew is in Proctor's dealings. And I can't stop wondering just who else went along with Proctor and engaged in these types of conversations. Are these officers still on the police force? Have they quietly retired? Are any of them still working details in Canton? Has any of them left Canton PD? Are any of them now passed away? But most importantly: will the public ever see these communications and know the truth of how their own officers, paid by their tax dollars, feel about them and their community members?
0:26

Michael Proctor's new data extraction were confirmed to have racist and biased communications in them. Attorney Rosemary Scapicchio confirmed on 10/30/25: “If you’re already prejudiced to people because of the color of their skin, their ethnicity, if they’re a male or female, then you can’t have an open mind when you started this investigation.” Several other Norfolk County attorneys also were also able to receive this data extraction as Proctor investigated their clients cases. That being said, we also know the DA's office has them and most likely Massachusetts State Police. It's highly likely that Canton PD has parts of these communications considering Proctor was very friendly with several Canton officers. Proctor of course grew up and lives in town so his friendships with some of these individuals run decades long. I posted this video before the news of Canton PD Sgt Sean Goode had come out because I knew how entangled some of the Canton crew is in Proctor's dealings. And I can't stop wondering just who else went along with Proctor and engaged in these types of conversations. Are these officers still on the police force? Have they quietly retired? Are any of them still working details in Canton? Has any of them left Canton PD? Are any of them now passed away? But most importantly: will the public ever see these communications and know the truth of how their own officers, paid by their tax dollars, feel about them and their community members?

BoozeyBeauty

24,166 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten