正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

6 Things That Would INSTANTLY Fix America

130,030 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

36 条评论

Dyl's Plazy 的头像
Dyl's Plazy2 个月前

There is so much wrong with this I'm not even gonna elaborate. Just rub two brain cells together. Also America was NEVER a Christian Nation, in fact many of the founding fathers were ESCAPING the Church's Overreach.

RGBRogue 的头像
RGBRogue2 个月前

When are you running for office? Big W

Taco_Talks 的头像
Taco_Talks2 个月前

Literally never

Sebastian 的头像
Sebastian2 个月前

Its so funny, he pretends to be a christian intellectual. However, none of his recommendations come from biblical principles. And there is plenty to pull from.

Allen Indy 的头像
Allen Indy2 个月前

1: Yes 2: Yes 3: Absolutely not! The people defining the test would corrupt the metric. It would have the opposite effect. 4: Better, but won't solve the problem. Feds should tax the State coffers. That way States, and State reps would obstruct additional taxation by the Feds, and the 50 State laboratories would be restored.. 5: Hmmm. Not a bad idea. Let's try it. 6: Helpful, but as you said, not something that should be enforced. 7: I'm intoxicated.

Hevel 的头像
Hevel2 个月前

1 more thing: Federalism is DEAD in America. The 17th Amendment destroyed it States used to appoint senators so that the state had federal representation... the president was a dog catcher in American antiquity - the states were very different and in charge... the voting laws could possibly curb this - but we have a bloated leviathan DeFacto NATIONAL Government, not a federal system.

Dyne 的头像
Dyne2 个月前

I'm with most of these, except the voting one. Turning voting into a privilege that requires a morality + problem-solving test just creates a new caste system. We already have a financial one. No thanks. It's the same principle as guns and free speech: + Guns: you accept some gun deaths + Free speech: you accept words you hate + Voting: you accept that dipshits, midwits, and nitwits still get a say That's the price of not living under a permanent ruling class that decides who is "qualified."

Peace Lover 的头像
Peace Lover2 个月前

1. Jesus dude, just say you want to ban abortion 🙄 2. "Get rid of every gun law." No. Study how bad crime was in the 1930's then get back to me. Do you want to repeal all driving laws next? "Well regulated" is literally in the 2A and zero gun laws makes zero logical sense.

William Steelman 的头像
William Steelman2 个月前

Agree but add one more. Sunset requirement on all laws. If we want the laws to stay we have to reissue the law after 4 to 6 years

Kevin Hensin 的头像
Kevin Hensin2 个月前

Genuinely genius ideas that I’d could see every single one working, I think you forgot to ban sharia lawnation wide, arrest homeless drug addicts across the nation. As well as abolish DEI we should hire based on experience, and back ground checks in stead of the skin color.

Bombur, The Fatass Dwarf 🔞 的头像
Bombur, The Fatass Dwarf 🔞2 个月前

I agreed with everything but the Jesus part. I’m not even atheist I just thinking shoving that shit down people’s throats is cringe.

Jessica 的头像
Jessica2 个月前

How would a morality test work lol? Who decides the morals?

Appalachian Liberty 的头像
Appalachian Liberty2 个月前

Followed half way through

FranklinFlix.com 的头像
FranklinFlix.com2 个月前

How to fix our Country: 1. Term limits for ALL elected & appointed officials. 2. Outlaw lobbying. 3. Flat income tax for individuals AND Corporations - with NO loopholes. 4. Government officials held to the same laws & rules as all Citizens. 5. Federal & State Voter ID laws.

Victor White 的头像
Victor White2 个月前

Return to only granting citizenship to “Free White Person(s) [males]… of good character.” Forced remigration / deportation for the majority of nonWhites, and then you don’t have to tiptoe around why those “4 cities with democrats and pew pew laws” or whatever are ACTUALLY a problem. Hint, it’s not the laws, it’s the people the laws are meant to govern. The constitution really is just the worthless piece of paper so many claim it is, if the principles don’t abide in the spirit of the people it purports to represent. See: Liberia, with our exact constitution, yet a third world hell hole. Missing: Whites. There is no sin of racism, and you are called as a Christian to care for your kin. Your immediate family -> extended family -> race.

OAugustoM 的头像
OAugustoM2 个月前

This is just nazi propaganda.

Wes 的头像
Wes2 个月前

The one thing I would want to make sure would change is how we vote on bills. It should be a single bill per vote. These insane bills that have 100 different laws and money packages attached to it all pushed in by different lobbies. It’s bullshit.

Ian Mckeller 的头像
Ian Mckeller2 个月前

@Lykros_3

Mr. Controversy himself 的头像
Mr. Controversy himself2 个月前

I agree with term limits on every role in politics except for the Supreme Court. Their job has nothing to do with up to date morality. Their job is to take every law and say “is this constitutional?”

PapaKhan 的头像
PapaKhan2 个月前

Lmao do all these 5 things and you have to believe in a 2000 year old fairy tale. Might as well just believe the lord of the rings is based on fact if that’s how melted your brain is

Seth 的头像
Seth2 个月前

A few extra helpful fixes: Birthright citizenship is reserved for 2nd generation Americans (parents must be born, raised, and live in America) Voting is reserved for heads of households, not individuals Give parents the public schools' money for homeschooling

BenBRockN🔥🏳️🏴 的头像
BenBRockN🔥🏳️🏴2 个月前

Flawed assumption: The people in power care about, or even want to fix, the system that continues to keep them in power. Also, if #4 doesn't include that tax on investments like stocks or bonds, then the elites will just dump all their money into that to prevent paying taxes.

Alex Mitchell 的头像
Alex Mitchell2 个月前

Most of this dumb and wrong, but why would we want people to hoard their money. Disastrous for the economy.

ShyGuy 的头像
ShyGuy2 个月前

Who decides what the correct answer is on the morality test?

Walt’s Burner 的头像
Walt’s Burner2 个月前

Don’t 100% agree with everything but huge respect for offering solutions instead of just complaining like everyone else

1790 Naturalization Act 的头像
1790 Naturalization Act2 个月前

Yeah believing in religions ain’t it. It’s all fake and gay and once people realize that we will start making progress.

Cody 的头像
Cody2 个月前

The second point on the 2nd amendment is valid and should go further as each state should have a stand your ground law in place, just like Texas has

Dogtor Shitpost, MD 的头像
Dogtor Shitpost, MD2 个月前

lol I would love to see you take that complex test

Meme Enjoyer 的头像
Meme Enjoyer2 个月前

Good video but fuck that last point. Keeping Christian traditions and values is perfectly fine. Forcing a religion on everyone can pound sand. This is no different than sharia law.

Jacob Moehn 的头像
Jacob Moehn2 个月前

Bruh wants to uphold the Constittion for guns but wants to set the first amendment on fire lmao. Don’t think big guy would pass his own “complexity” test

Douglas McGuire 的头像
Douglas McGuire2 个月前

Agreed good sir

Matthew Hammond 的头像
Matthew Hammond2 个月前

According to the Fair Tax book it needed to be closer to 30% but it replaced business taxes too so they found that at the time it would not be the full 30% increase in prices customers would experience, as businesses already have most of the tax already baked into the price.

GoTP 的头像
GoTP2 个月前

Gotta address the professional bureaucrats…the civil ‘servants.’ I have an idea…similar to military’s ‘up or out’ officer promotion system. They improve performance and compete for fewer and fewer positions at higher grade. The only difference (which I wish the military would consider) is limit Senior Executive Service grades to maximum tenure of 6 years across all grades. Also, need to make it easier to fire/discipline civil servants.

🏳️‍⚧️ Molecular Mage 🏳️‍⚧️ 的头像
🏳️‍⚧️ Molecular Mage 🏳️‍⚧️2 个月前

Moral tests for voting … and then last point Christian nation …. I’m not getting a voice am I? … So what morals are we using and what happens if/when someone redefines what is moral?

Thinky Crow 的头像
Thinky Crow2 个月前

Okay, I get the moral argument for banning abortion… but how would that “fix” anything in the country? Also the US was never a Christian nation. In fact during the founding it was suggested the government officially recognize Jesus. This was voted down overwhelmingly.

Joe Bennett - OurRepublic.us 的头像
Joe Bennett - OurRepublic.us2 个月前

Why leave out forcing the actual Constitution to obeyed and enforced? Why? Because, it is always left out of every conversation. Why that is, is for you to decide. ⬇️

相关视频