Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

8-figure day trader Umar Ashraf sat down live with 15 unprofitable traders — and uncovered a truth most traders don’t want to face. One trader had a plan. A solid one. 5 trade max per week. 1–2 trades per day. Size staying consistent. But he was still losing. "My...

Wordsofrizdom's profile picture

Riz Iqbal

93,114 subscribers

19,760 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Today The Arena rolls out the next evolution of social trading! Introducing Copy Trading Here’s how it works 👇 Automatically copy any trader of Arena perps on Hyperliquid. Check the sentiment around the trader based on their recent trades and pledge a certain amount to copy trade them. Determine how much you want to pledge to copy a specific trader. When the trader puts in the trade, we calculate what percentage of their total portfolio is on the line and we mirror that percentage based on the funds you’ve pledged. Each time the trader initiates a trade, funds will automatically be deployed to copy the trade. Even if it’s the middle of the night and you’re fast asleep, never miss another profitable trade! For example, if you pledge $1,000 to copy a trader and they put 5% of their portfolio on a trade, $50 will be automatically deployed on the same trade. Traders earn fees from their copy traders after each profitable trade. The only action that will not be copied is adding additional margin, but we will still give the copy traders the option to manually add more margin very soon. If you’re a profitable trader, gain a following and get rewarded for making others money. If you are not a profitable trader, level up today by copying some of the best traders on a transparent leaderboard. Earn more, trade less. Only on The Arena ⚔️
0:29

Today The Arena rolls out the next evolution of social trading! Introducing Copy Trading Here’s how it works 👇 Automatically copy any trader of Arena perps on Hyperliquid. Check the sentiment around the trader based on their recent trades and pledge a certain amount to copy trade them. Determine how much you want to pledge to copy a specific trader. When the trader puts in the trade, we calculate what percentage of their total portfolio is on the line and we mirror that percentage based on the funds you’ve pledged. Each time the trader initiates a trade, funds will automatically be deployed to copy the trade. Even if it’s the middle of the night and you’re fast asleep, never miss another profitable trade! For example, if you pledge $1,000 to copy a trader and they put 5% of their portfolio on a trade, $50 will be automatically deployed on the same trade. Traders earn fees from their copy traders after each profitable trade. The only action that will not be copied is adding additional margin, but we will still give the copy traders the option to manually add more margin very soon. If you’re a profitable trader, gain a following and get rewarded for making others money. If you are not a profitable trader, level up today by copying some of the best traders on a transparent leaderboard. Earn more, trade less. Only on The Arena ⚔️

The Arena ⚔️

13,290 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Moving averages are not support. They are math. Scot1and, a trader and educator who builds his entire framework around price and auction activity, breaks down why this distinction is critical. A moving average has no participants behind it. A price congestion zone does — real volume, real transactions, real memory baked into the chart. When those two things coincide and the moving average holds, traders credit the indicator when they should credit the zone. When they diverge, traders get hurt holding a level that was never real to begin with. Real support is where the market has already done business. That is the only line worth watching.
2:32

Moving averages are not support. They are math. Scot1and, a trader and educator who builds his entire framework around price and auction activity, breaks down why this distinction is critical. A moving average has no participants behind it. A price congestion zone does — real volume, real transactions, real memory baked into the chart. When those two things coincide and the moving average holds, traders credit the indicator when they should credit the zone. When they diverge, traders get hurt holding a level that was never real to begin with. Real support is where the market has already done business. That is the only line worth watching.

TraderLion

14,544 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

He's right, I do have it in my notes because he did say it! 😆 On multiple instances, but here's him saying it on Trader Round Up: Timestamp 1:00:00 “They have to have the last two Mondays and the last two Fridays always, because they are the beginning and the end of the week.” ---- Timestamp 59:53 "In fact, every Monday, you should have two Mondays and two Fridays. In my opinion, if you’re going to ask me, like I teach my sons, they have to have the last two Mondays and the last two Fridays always because they’re at the beginning and the end of the week. So that’s what Cameron made money with today. He used information that is gleaned from that range, where we’re at in price action, and using the higher timeframe expectancy that we saw, that rejection when it went up to take that short term high." ---- Timestamp 1:00:46 "But every one of you listening, if you were my kid, if you were sitting with me, you would be hearing me tell you: Do you have two Mondays worth? Do you have both Fridays? Present today’s Friday and then last Friday’s Opening Range high, low and close, and the gradient levels on it? And then where are we in relation to that? Are we significantly above it, significantly below it, are we in close proximity to it? Because Monday’s Opening Range gap and Friday’s Opening Range gap are like a big huge draw on liquidity. It'll act like a big magnet. Not all the time, it’s not a panacea, but if we’ve traveled a lot one way, those Opening Ranges tend to be a factor on the close of the week and the beginning of the week. So Monday’s trading and Friday’s trading, using that framework that includes two weeks worth of Monday and Friday, have them in there. Even if you don’t want to carry Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday, the week prior to last week at least have that previous Monday in there, because that way you’ll gonna have a full range of opportunity that the algorithm will refer back to."
0:35

He's right, I do have it in my notes because he did say it! 😆 On multiple instances, but here's him saying it on Trader Round Up: Timestamp 1:00:00 “They have to have the last two Mondays and the last two Fridays always, because they are the beginning and the end of the week.” ---- Timestamp 59:53 "In fact, every Monday, you should have two Mondays and two Fridays. In my opinion, if you’re going to ask me, like I teach my sons, they have to have the last two Mondays and the last two Fridays always because they’re at the beginning and the end of the week. So that’s what Cameron made money with today. He used information that is gleaned from that range, where we’re at in price action, and using the higher timeframe expectancy that we saw, that rejection when it went up to take that short term high." ---- Timestamp 1:00:46 "But every one of you listening, if you were my kid, if you were sitting with me, you would be hearing me tell you: Do you have two Mondays worth? Do you have both Fridays? Present today’s Friday and then last Friday’s Opening Range high, low and close, and the gradient levels on it? And then where are we in relation to that? Are we significantly above it, significantly below it, are we in close proximity to it? Because Monday’s Opening Range gap and Friday’s Opening Range gap are like a big huge draw on liquidity. It'll act like a big magnet. Not all the time, it’s not a panacea, but if we’ve traveled a lot one way, those Opening Ranges tend to be a factor on the close of the week and the beginning of the week. So Monday’s trading and Friday’s trading, using that framework that includes two weeks worth of Monday and Friday, have them in there. Even if you don’t want to carry Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday, the week prior to last week at least have that previous Monday in there, because that way you’ll gonna have a full range of opportunity that the algorithm will refer back to."

Pipmunch

181,710 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

Losses in forex is inevitable Basically what happens is that when a trader loses money in the Forex market, the money does not go to any particular person or entity. Instead, the money is considered a loss and disappears from the trader's account. When a trader loses money, the losses are simply deducted from their trading account balance. When a stock tumbles and an investor loses money, the money doesn't get redistributed to someone else. Drops in account value reflect dwindling investor interest and a change in investor perception of the stock. The best way to deal with a big trading loss is to take a small break. Consider your strategy and your position size before jumping back in. When you do decide you are ready, start small. If you are trading as an institutional trader, you will be taxed just as any other employee. In case you are a retail Forex trader, you will need to report your profits and losses. Retail Forex traders use a Form 1040 or Form 1040NR in the USA. Either trading too big or too often is the most common reason why Forex traders fail. Overtrading might be caused by unrealistically high profit goals, market addiction, or insufficient capitalization. The maximum loss per trade can be categorized into three levels: conservative, moderate, and aggressive. Traders who are conservative about safeguarding their capital will take a chance of no more than 1% on their total trading capital per trade. Good morning traders
1:22

Losses in forex is inevitable Basically what happens is that when a trader loses money in the Forex market, the money does not go to any particular person or entity. Instead, the money is considered a loss and disappears from the trader's account. When a trader loses money, the losses are simply deducted from their trading account balance. When a stock tumbles and an investor loses money, the money doesn't get redistributed to someone else. Drops in account value reflect dwindling investor interest and a change in investor perception of the stock. The best way to deal with a big trading loss is to take a small break. Consider your strategy and your position size before jumping back in. When you do decide you are ready, start small. If you are trading as an institutional trader, you will be taxed just as any other employee. In case you are a retail Forex trader, you will need to report your profits and losses. Retail Forex traders use a Form 1040 or Form 1040NR in the USA. Either trading too big or too often is the most common reason why Forex traders fail. Overtrading might be caused by unrealistically high profit goals, market addiction, or insufficient capitalization. The maximum loss per trade can be categorized into three levels: conservative, moderate, and aggressive. Traders who are conservative about safeguarding their capital will take a chance of no more than 1% on their total trading capital per trade. Good morning traders

FxLion

25,437 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Paul Tudor Jones opens a fireside chat with Druckenmiller by admitting one of his biggest mistakes: "after the crash of '87, i was so worried about debt to GDP that it caused me to be short the stock market for the entire decade of the nineties." an entire decade. one of the greatest bull markets in history. and one of the greatest traders alive sat short through the whole thing because of a macro obsession. then Druckenmiller adds his own version: "the one rule i had for thirty years of trading was never let my obsession with the debt interfere with my trading. because it never had market impact." "and then i looked at the numbers and i threw out my playbook." two of the best macro traders ever, both admitting that the hardest part of their career has been separating what they believe should happen from what the market actually does. until the math finally forces you to act.
0:57

Paul Tudor Jones opens a fireside chat with Druckenmiller by admitting one of his biggest mistakes: "after the crash of '87, i was so worried about debt to GDP that it caused me to be short the stock market for the entire decade of the nineties." an entire decade. one of the greatest bull markets in history. and one of the greatest traders alive sat short through the whole thing because of a macro obsession. then Druckenmiller adds his own version: "the one rule i had for thirty years of trading was never let my obsession with the debt interfere with my trading. because it never had market impact." "and then i looked at the numbers and i threw out my playbook." two of the best macro traders ever, both admitting that the hardest part of their career has been separating what they believe should happen from what the market actually does. until the math finally forces you to act.

Goshawk Trades

192,781 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Some of the best prop firm traders in the world just debated one of the most controversial rules in funded trading: the consistency rule. Kyle – holder of the largest propfirm payout ($2.5M) and nearly $5M in total payouts says ignore it completely and maximise the opportunity: “If I had a massive day… I’d just keep trading until the consistency got back under 30%.” And Trader Kane — over $2M+ in prop firm payouts argues the consistency rule actually forces better trading discipline: “Why would I want to make $10K a day on a $2.5K payout account?” Two completely different perspectives… From traders who’ve collectively made millions from prop firms. The reality? There’s no single answer. Some traders use the consistency rule as a safety mechanism. Others see it as something to exploit once they have a buffer. The real question is: Do you trade around the consistency rule… Or do you completely ignore it once opportunity appears? This roundtable episode is packed with debates like this from some of the best traders in the prop firm space. Watch the full episode below 👇
3:10

Some of the best prop firm traders in the world just debated one of the most controversial rules in funded trading: the consistency rule. Kyle – holder of the largest propfirm payout ($2.5M) and nearly $5M in total payouts says ignore it completely and maximise the opportunity: “If I had a massive day… I’d just keep trading until the consistency got back under 30%.” And Trader Kane — over $2M+ in prop firm payouts argues the consistency rule actually forces better trading discipline: “Why would I want to make $10K a day on a $2.5K payout account?” Two completely different perspectives… From traders who’ve collectively made millions from prop firms. The reality? There’s no single answer. Some traders use the consistency rule as a safety mechanism. Others see it as something to exploit once they have a buffer. The real question is: Do you trade around the consistency rule… Or do you completely ignore it once opportunity appears? This roundtable episode is packed with debates like this from some of the best traders in the prop firm space. Watch the full episode below 👇

Riz Iqbal

24,012 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Pradeep Bonde, a mentor to multiple 7, 8, and 9-figure traders says most traders are playing the wrong game. “People think trading is about passion… it’s not.” You can love the markets, study every day, and still not make money. Because there’s a gap: What real traders do vs what you think they do. “Most pros aren’t hitting home runs… they’re hitting singles. Over and over again.” But nobody wants that game. They come in wanting big wins, fast money, life-changing trades. Instead, the real game is repetitive, disciplined, and honestly… a bit boring. So here’s the real question: Are you willing to trade the way money is actually made… or just the way it looks exciting? Full episode 👇
2:01

Pradeep Bonde, a mentor to multiple 7, 8, and 9-figure traders says most traders are playing the wrong game. “People think trading is about passion… it’s not.” You can love the markets, study every day, and still not make money. Because there’s a gap: What real traders do vs what you think they do. “Most pros aren’t hitting home runs… they’re hitting singles. Over and over again.” But nobody wants that game. They come in wanting big wins, fast money, life-changing trades. Instead, the real game is repetitive, disciplined, and honestly… a bit boring. So here’s the real question: Are you willing to trade the way money is actually made… or just the way it looks exciting? Full episode 👇

Riz Iqbal

86,385 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

One Chicago trader made $2.5 million in five days. Another explained how a five-tick move could put you up $1 million or wipe out the same amount before lunch. That was the world a young Chicago worker walked into for the first time. Paper was flying. Thousands of traders were screaming prices, throwing hand signals, and risking their own money in a room that looked more like a riot than a workplace. He went back to his job that same day and gave two weeks’ notice He just knew: “This was where I needed to be.” At its peak, Chicago had roughly 9,000 pit traders across its exchanges. Some were making $20,000 to $30,000 a day. But the most revealing line had nothing to do with getting rich: “It’s not what you make. It’s what you don’t lose.” Because the same aggression that made traders fortunes could keep them trapped inside a losing position while a car, then a house, disappeared in real time. Bookmark it and watch this piece of market history Before the next generation forgets what trading looked like when every emotion was visible.
44:35

One Chicago trader made $2.5 million in five days. Another explained how a five-tick move could put you up $1 million or wipe out the same amount before lunch. That was the world a young Chicago worker walked into for the first time. Paper was flying. Thousands of traders were screaming prices, throwing hand signals, and risking their own money in a room that looked more like a riot than a workplace. He went back to his job that same day and gave two weeks’ notice He just knew: “This was where I needed to be.” At its peak, Chicago had roughly 9,000 pit traders across its exchanges. Some were making $20,000 to $30,000 a day. But the most revealing line had nothing to do with getting rich: “It’s not what you make. It’s what you don’t lose.” Because the same aggression that made traders fortunes could keep them trapped inside a losing position while a car, then a house, disappeared in real time. Bookmark it and watch this piece of market history Before the next generation forgets what trading looked like when every emotion was visible.

Sammy

114,346 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I just found a Polymarket trader who made over 500 trades with a 98% win rate… He started with just $10 and turned it into more than $18,000 in only 3 months. Here’s how he trades: > He focuses only on weather markets. > He usually enters positions at 40–60% probability and still wins. > Most likely, he uses airport weather data or aviation observations like METAR + SPECI to get the latest actual temperature data. > He keeps the same bet size for every trade, no gambling. Some of his recent trades: > Wellington: entered with only $8 and turned it into $243 > Buenos Aires: from $12 to $140 > Tokyo: from $43 to $297 All his current positions: I found this trader using this custom Live Trades filter: > Weather markets only > Bots excluded > Traders with >$10k Pnl only > Win rate >90% He is one of the most successful weather traders I have ever seen on Polymarket.
0:31

I just found a Polymarket trader who made over 500 trades with a 98% win rate… He started with just $10 and turned it into more than $18,000 in only 3 months. Here’s how he trades: > He focuses only on weather markets. > He usually enters positions at 40–60% probability and still wins. > Most likely, he uses airport weather data or aviation observations like METAR + SPECI to get the latest actual temperature data. > He keeps the same bet size for every trade, no gambling. Some of his recent trades: > Wellington: entered with only $8 and turned it into $243 > Buenos Aires: from $12 to $140 > Tokyo: from $43 to $297 All his current positions: I found this trader using this custom Live Trades filter: > Weather markets only > Bots excluded > Traders with >$10k Pnl only > Win rate >90% He is one of the most successful weather traders I have ever seen on Polymarket.

Recogard

13,428 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Threadguy reveals one of the smartest traders he knows is struggling to trade this market “One of my best friends I went to college with. He's a really good trader, he crushed 2024 and 2025” “I asked him how he's doing in the market and he's like, terrible. I can’t trade this memetic stuff, everything moves so schizo, I don’t know how to trade it” “I’m like dude close your eyes and long it. He’s like dude the OF girls are making more money in the stock market than me. I can’t trade it. We need a return to fundamentals”
1:10

Threadguy reveals one of the smartest traders he knows is struggling to trade this market “One of my best friends I went to college with. He's a really good trader, he crushed 2024 and 2025” “I asked him how he's doing in the market and he's like, terrible. I can’t trade this memetic stuff, everything moves so schizo, I don’t know how to trade it” “I’m like dude close your eyes and long it. He’s like dude the OF girls are making more money in the stock market than me. I can’t trade it. We need a return to fundamentals”

Jack

19,647 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

8 years back, I spoke to jack schwager, the man behind the Market Wizards series. Sandeep Rao - SEBI Reg. RA🖖 spoke to him again recently on In The Money, and it was an interesting conversation. Market Wizards is probably the only book I've read multiple times when I was trading actively. The one thing that stood out to me from the video was the debate between systematic vs. discretionary trading. There's a common assumption that the best traders are rules-based, meaning they follow a fixed set of rules. The logic is that this helps them keep their emotions in check so they can follow the signals dispassionately. But what Jack found among the traders he interviewed was that almost all of them were discretionary traders. They had rules, but they knew when not to follow them. Meaning, they knew when their approach wasn't working and when they had to change the "rules" they were following. The one purely systematic trader he ever profiled kept changing his systems. He once showed Jack the equity curve of the original system he made his first money on. It went straight up while he traded it, and straight down after he abandoned it. If he had stuck to it with blind discipline, he would have been wiped out. At the very least, what this shows is that there isn't just one way to make money. There are numerous approaches that work, and you ultimately have to figure out what works for you and stick with that approach until it stops working, because nothing works all the time. People change, the markets change, and so do the strategies. Full episode link in comments.
2:38

8 years back, I spoke to jack schwager, the man behind the Market Wizards series. Sandeep Rao - SEBI Reg. RA🖖 spoke to him again recently on In The Money, and it was an interesting conversation. Market Wizards is probably the only book I've read multiple times when I was trading actively. The one thing that stood out to me from the video was the debate between systematic vs. discretionary trading. There's a common assumption that the best traders are rules-based, meaning they follow a fixed set of rules. The logic is that this helps them keep their emotions in check so they can follow the signals dispassionately. But what Jack found among the traders he interviewed was that almost all of them were discretionary traders. They had rules, but they knew when not to follow them. Meaning, they knew when their approach wasn't working and when they had to change the "rules" they were following. The one purely systematic trader he ever profiled kept changing his systems. He once showed Jack the equity curve of the original system he made his first money on. It went straight up while he traded it, and straight down after he abandoned it. If he had stuck to it with blind discipline, he would have been wiped out. At the very least, what this shows is that there isn't just one way to make money. There are numerous approaches that work, and you ultimately have to figure out what works for you and stick with that approach until it stops working, because nothing works all the time. People change, the markets change, and so do the strategies. Full episode link in comments.

Nithin Kamath

70,965 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

With $5M+ in prop firm payouts, Okala shares his view on trading most traders might not agree with: There is no “max trades per day” rule. “If you’re hot… step on the gas.” That’s how he approaches the market. Because in his view, the market doesn’t reward restraint… It rewards timing and execution. But here’s where it gets uncomfortable: Most traders aren’t losing because they trade too much… They’re losing because they trade the same way, when conditions completely change. They press when the market is dead. They force when structure disappears. They keep clicking… just to feel in control. That’s not trading. That’s reacting. And that’s where overtrading actually lives. Not in the number of trades… But in the inability to step back when your edge is no longer there. So maybe the question isn’t: “How many trades should you take?” It’s: Can you recognise when you’re in sync with the market… and when you’re not? Because one makes you money. The other gives it all back. Do you agree with this approach… or not? Watch the full episode — and see exactly how he executes (Live). 👇
1:24

With $5M+ in prop firm payouts, Okala shares his view on trading most traders might not agree with: There is no “max trades per day” rule. “If you’re hot… step on the gas.” That’s how he approaches the market. Because in his view, the market doesn’t reward restraint… It rewards timing and execution. But here’s where it gets uncomfortable: Most traders aren’t losing because they trade too much… They’re losing because they trade the same way, when conditions completely change. They press when the market is dead. They force when structure disappears. They keep clicking… just to feel in control. That’s not trading. That’s reacting. And that’s where overtrading actually lives. Not in the number of trades… But in the inability to step back when your edge is no longer there. So maybe the question isn’t: “How many trades should you take?” It’s: Can you recognise when you’re in sync with the market… and when you’re not? Because one makes you money. The other gives it all back. Do you agree with this approach… or not? Watch the full episode — and see exactly how he executes (Live). 👇

chartfanatics

12,341 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Kyle (aka JadeCap), the trader behind the world-record $2.5M single payout, drew a line between discipline and ego that most traders miss. "I think that's the male ego talking." He wasn't being harsh. He was being honest. Ryan, one of the 15 unprofitable traders in the room, felt like surrendering to his environment was a weakness. That a real trader should be the anchor. Unshakeable. Anywhere. Kyle understood the feeling. But he'd seen what happens when traders convince themselves the environment doesn't matter. The best traders he knows? Boring. Same meals every day. Same schedule. Same environment. Not because they lack ambition but because they understand what consistency actually costs. He didn't leave the country until he was 31. Friends were travelling through their 20s. He stayed locked in, because he knew what slipping out of routine did to his performance. Ryan pushed back. Said he should be the pillar. Shouldn't need the room. Kyle's answer was simple: that's not discipline. That's ego. Your diet, your sleep, your relationships; all of it bleeds into your PNL whether you recognise it or not. So ask yourself this: Are you disciplined enough to control your environment, or just too proud to admit it matters? Full Episode 👇
4:04

Kyle (aka JadeCap), the trader behind the world-record $2.5M single payout, drew a line between discipline and ego that most traders miss. "I think that's the male ego talking." He wasn't being harsh. He was being honest. Ryan, one of the 15 unprofitable traders in the room, felt like surrendering to his environment was a weakness. That a real trader should be the anchor. Unshakeable. Anywhere. Kyle understood the feeling. But he'd seen what happens when traders convince themselves the environment doesn't matter. The best traders he knows? Boring. Same meals every day. Same schedule. Same environment. Not because they lack ambition but because they understand what consistency actually costs. He didn't leave the country until he was 31. Friends were travelling through their 20s. He stayed locked in, because he knew what slipping out of routine did to his performance. Ryan pushed back. Said he should be the pillar. Shouldn't need the room. Kyle's answer was simple: that's not discipline. That's ego. Your diet, your sleep, your relationships; all of it bleeds into your PNL whether you recognise it or not. So ask yourself this: Are you disciplined enough to control your environment, or just too proud to admit it matters? Full Episode 👇

Riz Iqbal

57,815 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Paul Tudor Jones told everyone the market was about to crash - they laughed at him then October 1987 hit and the Dow lost 22% in a day - he made 200% that month he sat down next to Stanley Druckenmiller and they explained how they each saw the move before it happened "losers average losers" "every day I assume every position I have is wrong" two traders. zero losing decades. one conversation. bookmark and watch it today
38:02

Paul Tudor Jones told everyone the market was about to crash - they laughed at him then October 1987 hit and the Dow lost 22% in a day - he made 200% that month he sat down next to Stanley Druckenmiller and they explained how they each saw the move before it happened "losers average losers" "every day I assume every position I have is wrong" two traders. zero losing decades. one conversation. bookmark and watch it today

st1ne

131,431 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The SEC just killed the $25,000 day trading rule. 25 years. finally over. The Pattern Day Trader rule is officially eliminated. New minimum is $2,000. I asked Claude what this means for retail traders: 🟢 CLAUDE'S ANALYSIS - April 15, 2026 "This is the biggest democratization event in retail trading since commission-free brokerages in 2019." The PDT rule was a wealth gate - not a risk gate. It didn't protect small traders, it excluded them. A trader with $500 can now run the same intraday strategies a $25,000 account ran for 25 years. The edge was never the capital. It was the access. The barrier just dropped from $25,000 to one prompt" the old game: → need $25,000 to day trade → 90-day freeze if you broke the rule → retail locked out for 25 years the new game: → $2,000 minimum → unlimited day trades → any account can run automated strategies Claude can build that strategy for you 30 minutes. zero code. Join for the full Claude Trading guide.
0:24

The SEC just killed the $25,000 day trading rule. 25 years. finally over. The Pattern Day Trader rule is officially eliminated. New minimum is $2,000. I asked Claude what this means for retail traders: 🟢 CLAUDE'S ANALYSIS - April 15, 2026 "This is the biggest democratization event in retail trading since commission-free brokerages in 2019." The PDT rule was a wealth gate - not a risk gate. It didn't protect small traders, it excluded them. A trader with $500 can now run the same intraday strategies a $25,000 account ran for 25 years. The edge was never the capital. It was the access. The barrier just dropped from $25,000 to one prompt" the old game: → need $25,000 to day trade → 90-day freeze if you broke the rule → retail locked out for 25 years the new game: → $2,000 minimum → unlimited day trades → any account can run automated strategies Claude can build that strategy for you 30 minutes. zero code. Join for the full Claude Trading guide.

AlphaCartel

56,178 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Risk management is the only skill that survives a cycle change. Strategies die. Setups stop working. Indicators get arbed away within a cycle. I have been here for a decade. Survived three bear markets. The traders still standing from the 2018 cohort are not the ones who had the best setup. They are the ones who never had a single trade big enough to take them out. Size correctly and the worst-case loss is a Tuesday inconvenience. Size wrong once and the cycle is over before it started. You don't train risk management when you are losing. You train it when you are winning. Makes sense?
0:31

Risk management is the only skill that survives a cycle change. Strategies die. Setups stop working. Indicators get arbed away within a cycle. I have been here for a decade. Survived three bear markets. The traders still standing from the 2018 cohort are not the ones who had the best setup. They are the ones who never had a single trade big enough to take them out. Size correctly and the worst-case loss is a Tuesday inconvenience. Size wrong once and the cycle is over before it started. You don't train risk management when you are losing. You train it when you are winning. Makes sense?

₿IRB

12,137 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

"every single trader out there seems to make the same mistake over and over again. their position size is probably two to ten times more than it should be." martin shkreli built a kelly criterion simulator to test exactly this. "most folks don't actually have an edge when they trade. but if they did, they're trading as if they had a 4x or 5x kelly edge." "if you run the simulator, you will go to zero each time." "even with a 60/40 edge on every trade you make, you'll go bust if you overbet." "and who has a 60/40 edge in the stock market? nobody has a 60/40 edge." even a real edge, sized wrong, still ends at zero. sizing is too commonly the part I see every trader consider second or third.
3:04

"every single trader out there seems to make the same mistake over and over again. their position size is probably two to ten times more than it should be." martin shkreli built a kelly criterion simulator to test exactly this. "most folks don't actually have an edge when they trade. but if they did, they're trading as if they had a 4x or 5x kelly edge." "if you run the simulator, you will go to zero each time." "even with a 60/40 edge on every trade you make, you'll go bust if you overbet." "and who has a 60/40 edge in the stock market? nobody has a 60/40 edge." even a real edge, sized wrong, still ends at zero. sizing is too commonly the part I see every trader consider second or third.

Goshawk Trades

337,431 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

Chris Camillo reveals he made over $10,000,000 in 3 months trading $AMZN , $BE , and $HOOD “It's eight figures between the three, and it's been the best few months that I've had in 18 years.” “I think Amazon was an eight-figure trade alone. So, I mean, last time I was on, I told you I was doing this, right? Like, I've been waiting for this trade for years. I've been waiting for this trade for over a decade, and I always say having a prepared mind is one of the most important things an investor can do 'cause it's usually during the years when there aren't any high-conviction trades like that that you have to prepare yourself to make the move when one comes around.”
0:39

Chris Camillo reveals he made over $10,000,000 in 3 months trading $AMZN , $BE , and $HOOD “It's eight figures between the three, and it's been the best few months that I've had in 18 years.” “I think Amazon was an eight-figure trade alone. So, I mean, last time I was on, I told you I was doing this, right? Like, I've been waiting for this trade for years. I've been waiting for this trade for over a decade, and I always say having a prepared mind is one of the most important things an investor can do 'cause it's usually during the years when there aren't any high-conviction trades like that that you have to prepare yourself to make the move when one comes around.”

The Iced Coffee Hour

147,372 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Dave Ramsey says he bought real estate for 15 cents on the dollar in 2008 "2008 real estate was on sale. I had a bunch of cash then and I bought a whole bunch of stuff 15-20 cents on the dollar and I was buying a lot of really nice properties for nothing" "The interesting thing about real estate when you don't have any debt on it is it cash flows like crazy. If you get one or two properties, pretty quickly they'll throw off enough cash to buy the third one" "The hardest one is the first one. The next hardest is the second one"
0:46

Dave Ramsey says he bought real estate for 15 cents on the dollar in 2008 "2008 real estate was on sale. I had a bunch of cash then and I bought a whole bunch of stuff 15-20 cents on the dollar and I was buying a lot of really nice properties for nothing" "The interesting thing about real estate when you don't have any debt on it is it cash flows like crazy. If you get one or two properties, pretty quickly they'll throw off enough cash to buy the third one" "The hardest one is the first one. The next hardest is the second one"

Casper

694,336 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten