Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

90% of traders would FAIL this trade before it even started. Why? Because they entered without knowing where the odds were leaning. Meanwhile I had: • 70%+ probabilities • statistical bias • liquidity target already mapped So while retail was guessing… I was waiting for confirmation INTO the more... show more

Herman Trading

10,249 subscribers

11,819 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I posted the target BEFORE price got there. 75.8%+ probability. At 8:10am NY time I posted the exact New York bias from my indicators: LOWER prices towards London low. 20 minutes later? Price traded directly into it. This is why trading with probabilities changes everything. When you already know where the odds are leaning BEFORE execution… decision-making becomes completely different. Trade with probabilities. Not predictions. Would you trade differently if you already knew where the odds were leaning before New York open? #NQ #ICT #Trading

I posted the target BEFORE price got there. 75.8%+ probability. At 8:10am NY time I posted the exact New York bias from my indicators: LOWER prices towards London low. 20 minutes later? Price traded directly into it. This is why trading with probabilities changes everything. When you already know where the odds are leaning BEFORE execution… decision-making becomes completely different. Trade with probabilities. Not predictions. Would you trade differently if you already knew where the odds were leaning before New York open? #NQ #ICT #Trading

Herman Trading

12,530 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

80% probabilities. +2R 🔥 ORB15 strikes again. Most traders enter 9:30 NY open completely blind. Intelligent Balance Probability Map [Herman] already showed where the odds were leaning during the 9:30–9:45 ORB15 window. Not predictions. Statistical imbalance. Wait for confirmation - 1min iFVG Execute in the more probable direction. Let probabilities do the heavy lifting. 9:30–9:45 might genuinely be one of the most engineered windows in futures trading when you understand the data behind it. ORB15 is becoming absolutely GOATED with probabilities. Would you trade differently if you already knew the higher probability direction before the open? 👇 #NQ #ICT

80% probabilities. +2R 🔥 ORB15 strikes again. Most traders enter 9:30 NY open completely blind. Intelligent Balance Probability Map [Herman] already showed where the odds were leaning during the 9:30–9:45 ORB15 window. Not predictions. Statistical imbalance. Wait for confirmation - 1min iFVG Execute in the more probable direction. Let probabilities do the heavy lifting. 9:30–9:45 might genuinely be one of the most engineered windows in futures trading when you understand the data behind it. ORB15 is becoming absolutely GOATED with probabilities. Would you trade differently if you already knew the higher probability direction before the open? 👇 #NQ #ICT

Herman Trading

20,852 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

84% BEARISH BIAS - New York ORB15 $NQ Not after the move. BEFORE IT Today’s ORB15 (9:30–9:45 NY time) on NQ showed a massive bearish imbalance: 84% probability to the downside. So the plan was simple: wait for confirmation → iFVG entry → execute. Result? 2R This is why probabilities change everything. Most traders enter New York Session guessing direction. I enter already knowing where the odds are leaning. Trade with probabilities. Not predictions. #NQ #ICT

84% BEARISH BIAS - New York ORB15 $NQ Not after the move. BEFORE IT Today’s ORB15 (9:30–9:45 NY time) on NQ showed a massive bearish imbalance: 84% probability to the downside. So the plan was simple: wait for confirmation → iFVG entry → execute. Result? 2R This is why probabilities change everything. Most traders enter New York Session guessing direction. I enter already knowing where the odds are leaning. Trade with probabilities. Not predictions. #NQ #ICT

Herman Trading

18,138 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This is what a textbook A+ setup on NQ looks like. The direction was already defined before the trade appeared. Today, the London Probability Map showed a 73.5% probability for the more probable LOW. So I was not interested in longs - SHORTS ONLY. I only needed one clean SHORT confirmation: • Sweep of liquidity • Bearish iFVG • Entry aligned with the statistically more probable direction That is it. Historical data and probabilities define the direction. Price action gives the entry. Trade entry + directional edge = A+ setup. The attached video shows the full London session execution step by step. How much simpler would your trading become if you stopped guessing the direction first?

This is what a textbook A+ setup on NQ looks like. The direction was already defined before the trade appeared. Today, the London Probability Map showed a 73.5% probability for the more probable LOW. So I was not interested in longs - SHORTS ONLY. I only needed one clean SHORT confirmation: • Sweep of liquidity • Bearish iFVG • Entry aligned with the statistically more probable direction That is it. Historical data and probabilities define the direction. Price action gives the entry. Trade entry + directional edge = A+ setup. The attached video shows the full London session execution step by step. How much simpler would your trading become if you stopped guessing the direction first?

Herman Trading

17,352 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Most traders still think the edge is the entry. It’s not. Today both probability models aligned with the same objective BEFORE price even got there. London Probability Map: 73.5% probability to sweep the LOW first. Price delivered exactly there. New York Probability Map: 72.8% probability to sweep the LOW first. Another textbook A+ setup. Another delivery. Trade entry in both cases? Basic ICT iFVG execution in the direction of the more probable side. That’s the part most traders miss. The iFVG is not the edge. The probabilities are. When you already know where price is statistically more likely to go first… execution becomes calmer, cleaner and far less emotional. Would your trading change if you started every session already knowing where the odds were leaning first? #NQ #ICT

Most traders still think the edge is the entry. It’s not. Today both probability models aligned with the same objective BEFORE price even got there. London Probability Map: 73.5% probability to sweep the LOW first. Price delivered exactly there. New York Probability Map: 72.8% probability to sweep the LOW first. Another textbook A+ setup. Another delivery. Trade entry in both cases? Basic ICT iFVG execution in the direction of the more probable side. That’s the part most traders miss. The iFVG is not the edge. The probabilities are. When you already know where price is statistically more likely to go first… execution becomes calmer, cleaner and far less emotional. Would your trading change if you started every session already knowing where the odds were leaning first? #NQ #ICT

Herman Trading

14,145 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

LONG or SHORT? Because right now… the odds are screaming one direction. 8:00am New York Session. Both indicators agree: • New York Probability Map • Intelligent Balance 75.8%+ probability of sweeping London’s Low first. So while most traders are about to randomly click buy or sell… I already know which side has the statistical advantage. That doesn’t guarantee the trade. But it changes the entire way you approach execution. Trading becomes calmer. Cleaner. More intentional. Because when probabilities align BEFORE New York opens… you stop guessing. You start trading with odds on your side. So be honest: Are you longing into 75.8% downside probability… or trading with the statistics?

LONG or SHORT? Because right now… the odds are screaming one direction. 8:00am New York Session. Both indicators agree: • New York Probability Map • Intelligent Balance 75.8%+ probability of sweeping London’s Low first. So while most traders are about to randomly click buy or sell… I already know which side has the statistical advantage. That doesn’t guarantee the trade. But it changes the entire way you approach execution. Trading becomes calmer. Cleaner. More intentional. Because when probabilities align BEFORE New York opens… you stop guessing. You start trading with odds on your side. So be honest: Are you longing into 75.8% downside probability… or trading with the statistics?

Herman Trading

17,870 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

LIVE TRADE: NQ showed a 77% probability to sweep London’s High first today. Did we reach it? I don’t know. I already secured profits. Because most traders misunderstand what “more probable” actually means. A 77% probability does NOT mean: “Hold TP blindly until London High.” It means: my entire bias and trade direction is ONLY aligned with the statistically stronger side. That changes everything. I am not randomly longing and shorting inside noise. I am trading WITH the side that historically has the advantage. The target is optional. The directional edge is the real weapon. Would your trading improve if you stopped fighting the statistically stronger side? #NQ #ICT

LIVE TRADE: NQ showed a 77% probability to sweep London’s High first today. Did we reach it? I don’t know. I already secured profits. Because most traders misunderstand what “more probable” actually means. A 77% probability does NOT mean: “Hold TP blindly until London High.” It means: my entire bias and trade direction is ONLY aligned with the statistically stronger side. That changes everything. I am not randomly longing and shorting inside noise. I am trading WITH the side that historically has the advantage. The target is optional. The directional edge is the real weapon. Would your trading improve if you stopped fighting the statistically stronger side? #NQ #ICT

Herman Trading

14,797 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Most traders make trading too complicated. My mechanical approach is simple: -Wait for Intelligent Balance. -Identify the more probable side. -Trade ONLY in that direction. -Use iFVG as execution. Target fixed R. No setup toward the bias = no trade. Today’s New York session was a perfect example. Intelligent Balance showed 70% for SHORTS. That means I was NOT interested in longs. I did not need to predict every candle. I did not need to catch the top. I did not need to trade both directions. My job was simple: Wait for price to show bearish confirmation toward the more probable side. Once the iFVG appeared in the short direction, that became the mechanical entry. Bias came from Intelligent Balance. Execution came from iFVG. Risk handled the rest. This is why direction matters more than entry. A basic ICT concept becomes much easier when you already know which side you are allowed to trade. Would your trading improve if you stopped asking “long or short?” every 5 minutes and only traded toward the higher probability side?

Most traders make trading too complicated. My mechanical approach is simple: -Wait for Intelligent Balance. -Identify the more probable side. -Trade ONLY in that direction. -Use iFVG as execution. Target fixed R. No setup toward the bias = no trade. Today’s New York session was a perfect example. Intelligent Balance showed 70% for SHORTS. That means I was NOT interested in longs. I did not need to predict every candle. I did not need to catch the top. I did not need to trade both directions. My job was simple: Wait for price to show bearish confirmation toward the more probable side. Once the iFVG appeared in the short direction, that became the mechanical entry. Bias came from Intelligent Balance. Execution came from iFVG. Risk handled the rest. This is why direction matters more than entry. A basic ICT concept becomes much easier when you already know which side you are allowed to trade. Would your trading improve if you stopped asking “long or short?” every 5 minutes and only traded toward the higher probability side?

Herman Trading

34,472 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

London Session today, both of my probability tools aligned: • Probability Map: 76.5% LONGS • Intelligent Balance: 72% LONGS That immediately simplified the entire session. I was not interested in predicting every candle. I was not looking for shorts. I was looking for one thing only: BULLISH signatures toward the statistically more probable side. Any bullish iFVG? Any FVG supporting continuation? Any willingness from price to expand higher? The moment price started confirming the bias, I was joining in. This is how I approach day trading: Probability gives me the direction. Price action gives me the entry. Entries do not need to be complicated when you already know which side of the market deserves your attention. Would your trading improve if you stopped trying to trade both directions?

London Session today, both of my probability tools aligned: • Probability Map: 76.5% LONGS • Intelligent Balance: 72% LONGS That immediately simplified the entire session. I was not interested in predicting every candle. I was not looking for shorts. I was looking for one thing only: BULLISH signatures toward the statistically more probable side. Any bullish iFVG? Any FVG supporting continuation? Any willingness from price to expand higher? The moment price started confirming the bias, I was joining in. This is how I approach day trading: Probability gives me the direction. Price action gives me the entry. Entries do not need to be complicated when you already know which side of the market deserves your attention. Would your trading improve if you stopped trying to trade both directions?

Herman Trading

14,624 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

➤ I almost quit trading. ➤ Not just because I was losing… but because I wasn’t getting the same value other traders were getting. ➤ It felt like I was doing everything right, but still falling behind. ➤ Then I realized something: ➤ Most traders aren’t just making money from trades… they’re earning from their activity. ➤ Every trade. Every referral. Every bit of volume, it all adds up. ➤ That’s exactly what’s happening on Yetch ➤ So how do traders really win in 2026? ➤ They stop relying only on profits… and start earning while they trade. ➤ Yetch is a trading terminal that gives back up to 20% of its profits to active users. ➤ While most platforms quietly take from you with fees, this one rewards you for showing up. ➤ And if you don’t have time to trade yourself, there’s a sniper bot that can execute opportunities for you. ➤ That’s when i realized it. ➤ This isn’t just trading anymore. ➤ This might be a goldmine. ➤ Let’s dig deeper. 🧵

➤ I almost quit trading. ➤ Not just because I was losing… but because I wasn’t getting the same value other traders were getting. ➤ It felt like I was doing everything right, but still falling behind. ➤ Then I realized something: ➤ Most traders aren’t just making money from trades… they’re earning from their activity. ➤ Every trade. Every referral. Every bit of volume, it all adds up. ➤ That’s exactly what’s happening on Yetch ➤ So how do traders really win in 2026? ➤ They stop relying only on profits… and start earning while they trade. ➤ Yetch is a trading terminal that gives back up to 20% of its profits to active users. ➤ While most platforms quietly take from you with fees, this one rewards you for showing up. ➤ And if you don’t have time to trade yourself, there’s a sniper bot that can execute opportunities for you. ➤ That’s when i realized it. ➤ This isn’t just trading anymore. ➤ This might be a goldmine. ➤ Let’s dig deeper. 🧵

0xJedi | Legion

12,371 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

My trading rule is simple: ALWAYS trade toward the more probable side. Not sometimes. Not when I feel like it. Not only when the setup looks perfect. Always. That is why I use Intelligent Balance. The indicator tells me which side is more probable. If it shows LONGS, I only look for longs. If it shows SHORTS, I only look for shorts. A clean setup against the more probable side? Ignored. A perfect iFVG against the more probable side? Ignored. CISD against the more probable side? Ignored. Because my job is not to trade every setup. My job is to wait for price to give me an entry toward the side with higher probability. The indicator gives me the side. Price action gives me the entry. Discipline keeps me out of the wrong trades. ALWAYS toward the more probable side. That one rule removes most of the noise. Would you still take a “perfect” setup against the more probable side?

My trading rule is simple: ALWAYS trade toward the more probable side. Not sometimes. Not when I feel like it. Not only when the setup looks perfect. Always. That is why I use Intelligent Balance. The indicator tells me which side is more probable. If it shows LONGS, I only look for longs. If it shows SHORTS, I only look for shorts. A clean setup against the more probable side? Ignored. A perfect iFVG against the more probable side? Ignored. CISD against the more probable side? Ignored. Because my job is not to trade every setup. My job is to wait for price to give me an entry toward the side with higher probability. The indicator gives me the side. Price action gives me the entry. Discipline keeps me out of the wrong trades. ALWAYS toward the more probable side. That one rule removes most of the noise. Would you still take a “perfect” setup against the more probable side?

Herman Trading

22,826 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

The best signal is sometimes NO signal. That is why I do not trade when Intelligent Balance shows less than 60%. Below 60% means one thing to me: NO CLEAR EDGE. And that is exactly where most traders destroy their account. They see a sweep. They see an iFVG. They see CISD. They convince themselves there is a trade. But without a strong more probable side, the setup has no real filter. For me: 60%+ = I have a side to focus on. Below 60% = I protect capital. Simple. Intelligent Balance is not only there to tell me where to trade. It is there to tell me when NOT to trade. Because forcing trades in a low-edge environment is not trading. It is gambling with extra steps. Would you skip a session if the indicator told you there is no clear edge?

The best signal is sometimes NO signal. That is why I do not trade when Intelligent Balance shows less than 60%. Below 60% means one thing to me: NO CLEAR EDGE. And that is exactly where most traders destroy their account. They see a sweep. They see an iFVG. They see CISD. They convince themselves there is a trade. But without a strong more probable side, the setup has no real filter. For me: 60%+ = I have a side to focus on. Below 60% = I protect capital. Simple. Intelligent Balance is not only there to tell me where to trade. It is there to tell me when NOT to trade. Because forcing trades in a low-edge environment is not trading. It is gambling with extra steps. Would you skip a session if the indicator told you there is no clear edge?

Herman Trading

18,993 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

90% of trading advice is designed to TURN you into liquidity for the rich. Think about it. Institutions taught you to: • Buy breakouts—right when institutions sell at the top. • Use tight stop losses—so you get shaken out before the real move happens. • Trade every setup you see—constantly in the market, paying spreads and commissions. Why? Because they have to make money off of someone. In other words: You become their exit liquidity. That's why conventional advice keeps retail traders active, confused and praying their next trade is profitable, while institutions become wealthy. — This is just a short clip from my recent 20-minute YouTube video. I also cover discussing the journaling method that actually improves your trading, how to spot fake gurus instantly and the simple technique that grew my account when I was a beginner. Just comment “TRADING” if you want to watch it and I’ll DM it to you immediately.

90% of trading advice is designed to TURN you into liquidity for the rich. Think about it. Institutions taught you to: • Buy breakouts—right when institutions sell at the top. • Use tight stop losses—so you get shaken out before the real move happens. • Trade every setup you see—constantly in the market, paying spreads and commissions. Why? Because they have to make money off of someone. In other words: You become their exit liquidity. That's why conventional advice keeps retail traders active, confused and praying their next trade is profitable, while institutions become wealthy. — This is just a short clip from my recent 20-minute YouTube video. I also cover discussing the journaling method that actually improves your trading, how to spot fake gurus instantly and the simple technique that grew my account when I was a beginner. Just comment “TRADING” if you want to watch it and I’ll DM it to you immediately.

The Trading Geek (Brad Goh)

34,545 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Qullamaggie on SMB Capital and Daytrading “Yeah, and I can tell you that the day trading is just most of the time a waste of time, like this SMB that prop firm. I mean, this was like a couple of years ago when I saw a video of their best trader who makes like 300k per year. And that’s a guy who’s been trading for like 20 years. If you’ve been trading for 20 years, you should make 300k a week, not per year. So, that’s another confirmation that day trading is just not gonna cut it if you want to make big money. You gotta swing and position trade.”

Qullamaggie on SMB Capital and Daytrading “Yeah, and I can tell you that the day trading is just most of the time a waste of time, like this SMB that prop firm. I mean, this was like a couple of years ago when I saw a video of their best trader who makes like 300k per year. And that’s a guy who’s been trading for like 20 years. If you’ve been trading for 20 years, you should make 300k a week, not per year. So, that’s another confirmation that day trading is just not gonna cut it if you want to make big money. You gotta swing and position trade.”

Lone

138,504 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

TJR SAYS options trading “makes no sense” and explains why he thinks it’s WORSE than futures 😳📉 “Options have the Greeks, there’s theta decay. So if you’re in a trade for five minutes versus fifteen minutes and price hits the exact same target… you make less money just because it took longer.” “Why would you trade something where you need it to hit in a certain time window just to get your full risk-reward? And if it takes three times as long to reach the same objective, you just make less money?” “I genuinely don’t know why people trade options. You’re trading the same assets, stocks, indexes, there’s no difference. So why add the extra problem?”

TJR SAYS options trading “makes no sense” and explains why he thinks it’s WORSE than futures 😳📉 “Options have the Greeks, there’s theta decay. So if you’re in a trade for five minutes versus fifteen minutes and price hits the exact same target… you make less money just because it took longer.” “Why would you trade something where you need it to hit in a certain time window just to get your full risk-reward? And if it takes three times as long to reach the same objective, you just make less money?” “I genuinely don’t know why people trade options. You’re trading the same assets, stocks, indexes, there’s no difference. So why add the extra problem?”

Hiastra

205,837 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

After 1,000+ trades, this is the only setup that consistently works in any market condition. It's called liquidity sweep reversal—and it's the highest probability trading strategy I know. Before I show you what it is, here are the two things most traders get wrong with it: 1) They enter too early and get stopped out on the second sweep. 2) They try to predict the LAST sweep with certainty This is a sure-fire way to burn your money. Here's what to do instead: Step 1: Identify market control Look at structure. Higher highs and higher lows? Buyers are in control. We're only trading from demand zones. Step 2: Mark your liquidity zones Find equal lows. When retail sees a "double bottom," they go long because textbooks tell them to. Their stop losses sit right below those lows. Available liquidity for institutions to sweep. Step 3: Wait for the sweep Price drops, sweeps those stops, liquidates retail traders, then creates a sharp V-shaped reaction. This sweep breaks structure. Zoom into 1-hour timeframe - price was making lower highs and lows. After the sweep? Higher highs and higher lows. That sweep zone becomes your institutional demand zone. Step 4: Enter on mitigation Wait for price to pull back to the liquidity zone. Enter there. Stop below the zone. Target 2-3R. Remember: You'll NEVER predict with 100% certainty when it's the LAST liquidity sweep. Sometimes price sweeps 2-3 times before the real move. But that's trading—we trade probabilities, not certainties. Also, keep in mind: If you can't spot the liquidity, you ARE the liquidity. — This is just a breakdown of one of the trading strategies we covered in our 2-hour long cryptocurrency trading course. I also discussed the trend pullback strategy, how to trade breakout retests without getting stopped out on fake moves, and why understanding liquidity is the only way to avoid becoming exit liquidity. Just comment "COURSE" and I'll DM it to you immediately so you can watch it.

After 1,000+ trades, this is the only setup that consistently works in any market condition. It's called liquidity sweep reversal—and it's the highest probability trading strategy I know. Before I show you what it is, here are the two things most traders get wrong with it: 1) They enter too early and get stopped out on the second sweep. 2) They try to predict the LAST sweep with certainty This is a sure-fire way to burn your money. Here's what to do instead: Step 1: Identify market control Look at structure. Higher highs and higher lows? Buyers are in control. We're only trading from demand zones. Step 2: Mark your liquidity zones Find equal lows. When retail sees a "double bottom," they go long because textbooks tell them to. Their stop losses sit right below those lows. Available liquidity for institutions to sweep. Step 3: Wait for the sweep Price drops, sweeps those stops, liquidates retail traders, then creates a sharp V-shaped reaction. This sweep breaks structure. Zoom into 1-hour timeframe - price was making lower highs and lows. After the sweep? Higher highs and higher lows. That sweep zone becomes your institutional demand zone. Step 4: Enter on mitigation Wait for price to pull back to the liquidity zone. Enter there. Stop below the zone. Target 2-3R. Remember: You'll NEVER predict with 100% certainty when it's the LAST liquidity sweep. Sometimes price sweeps 2-3 times before the real move. But that's trading—we trade probabilities, not certainties. Also, keep in mind: If you can't spot the liquidity, you ARE the liquidity. — This is just a breakdown of one of the trading strategies we covered in our 2-hour long cryptocurrency trading course. I also discussed the trend pullback strategy, how to trade breakout retests without getting stopped out on fake moves, and why understanding liquidity is the only way to avoid becoming exit liquidity. Just comment "COURSE" and I'll DM it to you immediately so you can watch it.

The Trading Geek (Brad Goh)

53,996 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Qullamaggie on His Friends That Started Trading With Him “Yeah, some of them. Some of them started up. You know some of them tried trading unsuccessfully. Two of my friends actually started trading; they traded for like a year, but yeah they didn’t have much success. They could have had success if they had stuck to it, but they got bored and they thought, you know, everyone thinks. You know, but it takes years and years and years, and that’s really the only difference between successful traders and unsuccessful traders. Because the successful ones don’t give up. They stick with it even if they blow up. They come back; they go back to trading. That’s what I did several times. I could just I could have just given up and you know finished my studies and gone to work. You know, worked at a regular job. And now I make as much money in a year that I would have made in a lifetime having a regular job. So dropping out of school was the best decision I’ve ever made. The funny thing is most of my friends don’t really know how much; how successful I am. Like they think I’m making like as much money as I would in a normal job.”

Qullamaggie on His Friends That Started Trading With Him “Yeah, some of them. Some of them started up. You know some of them tried trading unsuccessfully. Two of my friends actually started trading; they traded for like a year, but yeah they didn’t have much success. They could have had success if they had stuck to it, but they got bored and they thought, you know, everyone thinks. You know, but it takes years and years and years, and that’s really the only difference between successful traders and unsuccessful traders. Because the successful ones don’t give up. They stick with it even if they blow up. They come back; they go back to trading. That’s what I did several times. I could just I could have just given up and you know finished my studies and gone to work. You know, worked at a regular job. And now I make as much money in a year that I would have made in a lifetime having a regular job. So dropping out of school was the best decision I’ve ever made. The funny thing is most of my friends don’t really know how much; how successful I am. Like they think I’m making like as much money as I would in a normal job.”

Lone

37,714 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Once this liquidity sweep hits my target price (TP), I make $85,600 from this trade. This is a clip from a LIVE trade two weeks ago. (it’s not edited, cherry-picked or fabricated) And I’m sharing it with you now to reveal the fundamental principles behind why it was successful that can be applied to ANY trade. The video below is just a 4-minute breakdown from the original 20-minute live recording where I walk the thought process on the liquidity sweep, demand zones and target price in real-time. If you want to watch the full uncut live trade, then I can send it over to you immediately. Just comment “TRADING” for me (and you must be following). Now, why did I set 1.3253 as my TP? I already considered the best AND worse case scenarios: Even if price switched bearish after my entry, it would have to sweep liquidity again before reversing, which means coming up to take out the swing high first. This means either price continues pumping OR it reverses—but both scenarios hit my TP first. Once I mapped out the liquidity sweep + extreme demand zone hold + higher timeframe alignment, I could comfortably set 1.3253 as the optimal TP. We're not doing anything fancy here. Just the fundamentals I've executed 1,000+ times. Once you begin seeing the patterns, you can do this like clockwork. But it takes repetition to wire it into your brain.

Once this liquidity sweep hits my target price (TP), I make $85,600 from this trade. This is a clip from a LIVE trade two weeks ago. (it’s not edited, cherry-picked or fabricated) And I’m sharing it with you now to reveal the fundamental principles behind why it was successful that can be applied to ANY trade. The video below is just a 4-minute breakdown from the original 20-minute live recording where I walk the thought process on the liquidity sweep, demand zones and target price in real-time. If you want to watch the full uncut live trade, then I can send it over to you immediately. Just comment “TRADING” for me (and you must be following). Now, why did I set 1.3253 as my TP? I already considered the best AND worse case scenarios: Even if price switched bearish after my entry, it would have to sweep liquidity again before reversing, which means coming up to take out the swing high first. This means either price continues pumping OR it reverses—but both scenarios hit my TP first. Once I mapped out the liquidity sweep + extreme demand zone hold + higher timeframe alignment, I could comfortably set 1.3253 as the optimal TP. We're not doing anything fancy here. Just the fundamentals I've executed 1,000+ times. Once you begin seeing the patterns, you can do this like clockwork. But it takes repetition to wire it into your brain.

The Trading Geek (Brad Goh)

48,877 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Qullamaggie on Why You Need Patience in Trading “If you day trade, you will find trades pretty much every day. There is no bad or there is no good or bad market in that way. Like you can pretty much trade almost every day as long as you get set up. But swing trading is different because swing trading just doesn't work all the time, at least on the long side. You have to be inactive for long periods of time, sometimes for months. While if you're a day trader, you can be more active. Like there is not necessarily periods where you have to be more inactive to the same extent as in swing and position trading. You gotta have a lot of patience. That's also why it's better to have a larger account if you start swing trading because you don't have to worry about the money as much. Like, oh, I have bills to pay, I need to trade, I need to make money. So it's better to have a larger account because you don't give a sh*t. So what if I don't make money this month? It doesn't matter because maybe next month I'll make a million, right? So it doesn't really matter if I don't make money this month. It’s very psychological, too. Very, very psychological, this game.”

Qullamaggie on Why You Need Patience in Trading “If you day trade, you will find trades pretty much every day. There is no bad or there is no good or bad market in that way. Like you can pretty much trade almost every day as long as you get set up. But swing trading is different because swing trading just doesn't work all the time, at least on the long side. You have to be inactive for long periods of time, sometimes for months. While if you're a day trader, you can be more active. Like there is not necessarily periods where you have to be more inactive to the same extent as in swing and position trading. You gotta have a lot of patience. That's also why it's better to have a larger account if you start swing trading because you don't have to worry about the money as much. Like, oh, I have bills to pay, I need to trade, I need to make money. So it's better to have a larger account because you don't give a sh*t. So what if I don't make money this month? It doesn't matter because maybe next month I'll make a million, right? So it doesn't really matter if I don't make money this month. It’s very psychological, too. Very, very psychological, this game.”

Lone

14,618 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

A+ NQ setup has exactly three parts. 1. Statistical bias: Probability Map shows 75%+ to one side. Not an opinion. Backtested across 10 years of NQ session data. That number narrows the playing field before price moves an inch. 2. The sweep: Liquidity is resting in the opposite direction. When price grabs it, that is not a fake-out. That is the fuel for the real move. You were expecting it. You were watching for it. 3. The entry model: After the sweep, the structure confirms. iFVG / CISD. A defined ICT concept with clear invalidation. Not a hope, not a gut feel. A model with a precise entry and a reason to be there. Probability tells you where. The sweep tells you when. The entry model tells you how. Remove any one of the three and you do not have an edge. You have a trade. How many of these boxes do you tick before you pull the trigger?

A+ NQ setup has exactly three parts. 1. Statistical bias: Probability Map shows 75%+ to one side. Not an opinion. Backtested across 10 years of NQ session data. That number narrows the playing field before price moves an inch. 2. The sweep: Liquidity is resting in the opposite direction. When price grabs it, that is not a fake-out. That is the fuel for the real move. You were expecting it. You were watching for it. 3. The entry model: After the sweep, the structure confirms. iFVG / CISD. A defined ICT concept with clear invalidation. Not a hope, not a gut feel. A model with a precise entry and a reason to be there. Probability tells you where. The sweep tells you when. The entry model tells you how. Remove any one of the three and you do not have an edge. You have a trade. How many of these boxes do you tick before you pull the trigger?

Herman Trading

20,079 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat