Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

A 2025 Nature study revealed a surprisingly simple way aspirin might help fight cancer metastasis. Researchers discovered that cancer cells trick blood vessels into releasing a substance called thromboxane A2 (TXA2). This chemical then sends a signal that basically tells our immune system’s T-cells to “stand down,” making it...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

449,814 subscribers

268,189 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Sağlık & İyilikBilim & Teknoloji
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Aspirin — the cheap pill sitting in your medicine cabinet — could become a powerful new tool against cancer. A March 2025 study published in Nature found that aspirin helps “unleash” T-cells in the immune system, making them more effective at hunting down and attacking cancer cells, including metastatic ones. Dr. Elisa Port, Chief of Breast Surgery at Mount Sinai, explained on CBS News that this ties into the same mechanism that makes aspirin effective at preventing blood clots and heart disease. The research builds on earlier work showing aspirin’s anti-inflammatory effects can enhance immunotherapy responses by reducing platelet-driven immune suppression. It’s still early stages (mostly animal data so far), and doctors aren’t recommending it for cancer prevention yet — but the potential is intriguing. It’s honestly wild that something so common and inexpensive might play a real role in fighting cancer. Shows how much we still have to discover about everyday medicines. If this holds up in larger human trials, it could offer a low-cost way to support cancer treatment for millions. Would you be excited or cautious if a common drug like aspirin turned out to have real anti-cancer effects?
1:27

Aspirin — the cheap pill sitting in your medicine cabinet — could become a powerful new tool against cancer. A March 2025 study published in Nature found that aspirin helps “unleash” T-cells in the immune system, making them more effective at hunting down and attacking cancer cells, including metastatic ones. Dr. Elisa Port, Chief of Breast Surgery at Mount Sinai, explained on CBS News that this ties into the same mechanism that makes aspirin effective at preventing blood clots and heart disease. The research builds on earlier work showing aspirin’s anti-inflammatory effects can enhance immunotherapy responses by reducing platelet-driven immune suppression. It’s still early stages (mostly animal data so far), and doctors aren’t recommending it for cancer prevention yet — but the potential is intriguing. It’s honestly wild that something so common and inexpensive might play a real role in fighting cancer. Shows how much we still have to discover about everyday medicines. If this holds up in larger human trials, it could offer a low-cost way to support cancer treatment for millions. Would you be excited or cautious if a common drug like aspirin turned out to have real anti-cancer effects?

Camus

29,233 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨ImmunityBio’s Anktiva: A New FDA-Approved Immunotherapy for certain bladder cancer. They are also developing treatments that may reduce the need for strong chemo, for blood cancer, lung cancer, brain cancer, and more. Broader approvals may take time. Someone call the President and fast-track this. Dr. Pat Soon-Shiong leads development beyond typical biotech efforts. Most cancer medicines, like chemotherapy, work by poisoning fast-growing cells to kill the cancer. This also hurts healthy cells, causing side effects like hair loss and weakness. Anktiva is different. It is an immunotherapy that wakes up your body’s own immune cells; natural killer cells and T cells to hunt and destroy cancer cells themselves. It acts like a booster shot for your immune system, using a protein called IL-15 to make these cells multiply and remember how to fight cancer long-term. ImmunityBio is different from most companies because of 3 big unique things: 1. They wake up 3 kinds of fighter cells at the same time: • NK cells (natural killers) • CD8 T cells (main attackers) • CD4 T cells (helpers) These three work together like a basketball team. This makes the body remember the cancer for a long time (maybe years). 2. They have a special cell line called NK-92. → It’s like buying frozen pizza instead of making dough from scratch every time. Doctors can just thaw it and give it to any patient. No need to take cells from the sick kid, customize them, and make them super weak with hospital chemo (that’s what normal CAR-T does). 3. Their medicine Anktiva gives a long, steady boost to the immune cells. Older drugs (like IL-2) gave a short, crazy boost that made people very sick. Anktiva is seems safer, so far. Exciting to follow the development. Interview: Chris Cuomo (NewsNation) — “Killing Cancer”
8:29

🚨ImmunityBio’s Anktiva: A New FDA-Approved Immunotherapy for certain bladder cancer. They are also developing treatments that may reduce the need for strong chemo, for blood cancer, lung cancer, brain cancer, and more. Broader approvals may take time. Someone call the President and fast-track this. Dr. Pat Soon-Shiong leads development beyond typical biotech efforts. Most cancer medicines, like chemotherapy, work by poisoning fast-growing cells to kill the cancer. This also hurts healthy cells, causing side effects like hair loss and weakness. Anktiva is different. It is an immunotherapy that wakes up your body’s own immune cells; natural killer cells and T cells to hunt and destroy cancer cells themselves. It acts like a booster shot for your immune system, using a protein called IL-15 to make these cells multiply and remember how to fight cancer long-term. ImmunityBio is different from most companies because of 3 big unique things: 1. They wake up 3 kinds of fighter cells at the same time: • NK cells (natural killers) • CD8 T cells (main attackers) • CD4 T cells (helpers) These three work together like a basketball team. This makes the body remember the cancer for a long time (maybe years). 2. They have a special cell line called NK-92. → It’s like buying frozen pizza instead of making dough from scratch every time. Doctors can just thaw it and give it to any patient. No need to take cells from the sick kid, customize them, and make them super weak with hospital chemo (that’s what normal CAR-T does). 3. Their medicine Anktiva gives a long, steady boost to the immune cells. Older drugs (like IL-2) gave a short, crazy boost that made people very sick. Anktiva is seems safer, so far. Exciting to follow the development. Interview: Chris Cuomo (NewsNation) — “Killing Cancer”

Black Panther Capital

40,249 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

10 Headlines They Don’t Want You to Hear Today #10 – Entrepreneur and health innovator Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong concludes that the disease of cancer is merely a symptom of a collapsed immune system. According to Soon-Shiong, the key marker that’s been overlooked for decades is your Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC). He says when it drops below 1000 cells per microliter — a condition called lymphopenia — your body is left defenseless against infection, cancer growth, and metastasis. And science dating back to the 1990s reveals people with lymphopenia have much worse cancer outcomes. “What ALC is, actually, is your lymphocytes and your T-cells,” he told Megyn Kelly. “And the lymphocytes and T-cells are the only cells that really matter to prevent infection, to prevent cancer, to treat the cancer, to prevent metastasis,” he explained. “[So] it’s simple and yet profound that we’ve unlocked a paradigm change where we treat the host, i.e., the immune system, rather than the disease. In fact… the root cause of cancer is the collapse of the immune system.” Hat Tip: Camus SEE THE NEXT 9 STORIES BELOW
1:56

10 Headlines They Don’t Want You to Hear Today #10 – Entrepreneur and health innovator Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong concludes that the disease of cancer is merely a symptom of a collapsed immune system. According to Soon-Shiong, the key marker that’s been overlooked for decades is your Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC). He says when it drops below 1000 cells per microliter — a condition called lymphopenia — your body is left defenseless against infection, cancer growth, and metastasis. And science dating back to the 1990s reveals people with lymphopenia have much worse cancer outcomes. “What ALC is, actually, is your lymphocytes and your T-cells,” he told Megyn Kelly. “And the lymphocytes and T-cells are the only cells that really matter to prevent infection, to prevent cancer, to treat the cancer, to prevent metastasis,” he explained. “[So] it’s simple and yet profound that we’ve unlocked a paradigm change where we treat the host, i.e., the immune system, rather than the disease. In fact… the root cause of cancer is the collapse of the immune system.” Hat Tip: Camus SEE THE NEXT 9 STORIES BELOW

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,119,955 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Dr. Robert Lustig dropped some pretty heavy truth on Steven Bartlett’s podcast: Sugar isn’t just bad for your waistline — it’s directly linked to cancer. Here’s why, in plain terms: Anything that spikes insulin acts like a growth factor for cancer cells. Fructose messes with your mitochondria, basically feeding the cancer and telling cells to divide faster. Some cancers even have an enzyme that turns fructose into glucose right inside the tumor. So when we give cancer patients drinks like Ensure — loaded with sugar — we might actually be feeding the disease. Multiple studies (including large meta-analyses) show hyperinsulinemia and elevated IGF-1 significantly increase cancer risk. Fructose is metabolized almost entirely in the liver and promotes de novo lipogenesis and oxidative stress more aggressively than glucose. We’ve known sugar causes a lot of problems, but this connection to cancer feels especially urgent. The mechanisms are becoming clearer every year. Many of us are starting to realize that constantly feeding our bodies sugar might be doing way more long-term damage than we thought. What about you — has learning about sugar’s effects on cancer changed how you think about your own diet, or do you still see it as mostly a weight issue?
1:45

Dr. Robert Lustig dropped some pretty heavy truth on Steven Bartlett’s podcast: Sugar isn’t just bad for your waistline — it’s directly linked to cancer. Here’s why, in plain terms: Anything that spikes insulin acts like a growth factor for cancer cells. Fructose messes with your mitochondria, basically feeding the cancer and telling cells to divide faster. Some cancers even have an enzyme that turns fructose into glucose right inside the tumor. So when we give cancer patients drinks like Ensure — loaded with sugar — we might actually be feeding the disease. Multiple studies (including large meta-analyses) show hyperinsulinemia and elevated IGF-1 significantly increase cancer risk. Fructose is metabolized almost entirely in the liver and promotes de novo lipogenesis and oxidative stress more aggressively than glucose. We’ve known sugar causes a lot of problems, but this connection to cancer feels especially urgent. The mechanisms are becoming clearer every year. Many of us are starting to realize that constantly feeding our bodies sugar might be doing way more long-term damage than we thought. What about you — has learning about sugar’s effects on cancer changed how you think about your own diet, or do you still see it as mostly a weight issue?

Camus

22,078 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

7 Compelling Reasons Why Ivermectin Is a ‘Powerful Drug’ for Fighting Cancer Ivermectin is often recognized–2nd to penicillin–for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize. It is safer than Tylenol and brought river blindness to the brink of extinction, but the propagandists told you it was a “dangerous horse dewormer.” Well, it now turns out that ivermectin is not only an effective treatment for COVID-19, but it could also be a “powerful drug” for fighting cancer. Here are 7 reasons why. 1. Multiple Anti-Cancer Effects: Ivermectin impacts at least nine well-defined cancer targets, according to Dr. Alfonso Dueñas-González, an oncologist and senior researcher. He states, "There are at least nine perfectly defined cancer targets affected by ivermectin." 2. Enhances Effects of Chemotherapy and Radiation: Ivermectin not only targets tumor stem cells and promotes cancer cell death but also "enhances the effects of chemo and radiation therapy." This broad impact on the immune system increases the offense against cancers, making it a versatile adjunct to conventional treatments. 3. Inhibits Cancer Cell Cycles: The drug prevents the formation of new cancer cells by inhibiting cancer cell cycles and inducing mitochondrial stress, which leads to the killing of cancer cells. This mechanism is crucial for stopping the proliferation of cancerous cells. 4. Prevents Formation of New Blood Vessels Near Cancer Cells: Ivermectin prevents cancer survival by inhibiting the formation of new blood vessels that transport energy and fuel to cancers. This action starves the cancer cells, hindering their growth and spread. 5. Synergizes with Immunotherapy: Dr. Peter P. Lee, chair of immuno-oncology at the City of Hope, found that ivermectin could synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitor anti-PD1, enhancing the body's immune response to fight cancer. "What we’re learning is that ivermectin is going to be a very powerful drug in the context of really carefully developed immunotherapy combinations," he said. 6. Targets Cancer Stem Cells: Ivermectin preferentially targets cancer stem cells, which are a driver of cancer tumors and relapses. By focusing on these cells, ivermectin attacks the root of cancer's resilience and ability to recur. 7. The Curious Case of Rick Alderson: Mr. Alderson, a retired sawmill worker, “was a dead man walking” and given 6 months to live after his terminal colon cancer had metastasized and spread to his liver, where it had formed 25 distinct tumors. After starting ivermectin, Rick Alderson's carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, which are markers for tumor activity, dropped significantly from 1,498 ng/mL to 13.9 ng/mL in a matter of months. Of the 25 tumors in Mr. Alderson's liver, only three remained after his treatment with ivermectin and chemotherapy, indicating a substantial reduction in tumor burden. Mr. Alderson lived for two more years beyond his initial six-month prognosis, which his wife attributes to the use of ivermectin alongside chemotherapy.
3:43

7 Compelling Reasons Why Ivermectin Is a ‘Powerful Drug’ for Fighting Cancer Ivermectin is often recognized–2nd to penicillin–for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize. It is safer than Tylenol and brought river blindness to the brink of extinction, but the propagandists told you it was a “dangerous horse dewormer.” Well, it now turns out that ivermectin is not only an effective treatment for COVID-19, but it could also be a “powerful drug” for fighting cancer. Here are 7 reasons why. 1. Multiple Anti-Cancer Effects: Ivermectin impacts at least nine well-defined cancer targets, according to Dr. Alfonso Dueñas-González, an oncologist and senior researcher. He states, "There are at least nine perfectly defined cancer targets affected by ivermectin." 2. Enhances Effects of Chemotherapy and Radiation: Ivermectin not only targets tumor stem cells and promotes cancer cell death but also "enhances the effects of chemo and radiation therapy." This broad impact on the immune system increases the offense against cancers, making it a versatile adjunct to conventional treatments. 3. Inhibits Cancer Cell Cycles: The drug prevents the formation of new cancer cells by inhibiting cancer cell cycles and inducing mitochondrial stress, which leads to the killing of cancer cells. This mechanism is crucial for stopping the proliferation of cancerous cells. 4. Prevents Formation of New Blood Vessels Near Cancer Cells: Ivermectin prevents cancer survival by inhibiting the formation of new blood vessels that transport energy and fuel to cancers. This action starves the cancer cells, hindering their growth and spread. 5. Synergizes with Immunotherapy: Dr. Peter P. Lee, chair of immuno-oncology at the City of Hope, found that ivermectin could synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitor anti-PD1, enhancing the body's immune response to fight cancer. "What we’re learning is that ivermectin is going to be a very powerful drug in the context of really carefully developed immunotherapy combinations," he said. 6. Targets Cancer Stem Cells: Ivermectin preferentially targets cancer stem cells, which are a driver of cancer tumors and relapses. By focusing on these cells, ivermectin attacks the root of cancer's resilience and ability to recur. 7. The Curious Case of Rick Alderson: Mr. Alderson, a retired sawmill worker, “was a dead man walking” and given 6 months to live after his terminal colon cancer had metastasized and spread to his liver, where it had formed 25 distinct tumors. After starting ivermectin, Rick Alderson's carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, which are markers for tumor activity, dropped significantly from 1,498 ng/mL to 13.9 ng/mL in a matter of months. Of the 25 tumors in Mr. Alderson's liver, only three remained after his treatment with ivermectin and chemotherapy, indicating a substantial reduction in tumor burden. Mr. Alderson lived for two more years beyond his initial six-month prognosis, which his wife attributes to the use of ivermectin alongside chemotherapy.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

532,851 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🚨Big problem! Dr. Suzanne Humphries: "Here's the real sucker punch... the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility... but SV40-associated cancer won't respond well... to chemotherapy... [in fact,] radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive...." This clip of Dr. Humphries (Dr Suzanne Humphries), a medical doctor, board-certified internist, nephrologist, and co-author of Dissolving Illusions, is taken from a presentation posted to the Children's Health Defense (Children’s Health Defense) Rumble channel on November 12, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "And here's the real sucker punch. So you remember how SV40 knocks out that p53 gene and protein, which I talked to you before, the cancer suppressor. And that means that not only can the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility, right? But SV40-associated cancer won't respond well at all to chemotherapy. "And conventional cancer treatments are likely to make cancer actually go wild and not regress because p53, it actually directs cancer cells to die off. It's necessary for chemo and especially for radiation to do the killing that they're supposed to be doing. And the fact that radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive is the entire reason it was used in the Get Castro project, right? You know, radiating the animals first and then doing the gain of function with radiation. That's why they did it. "So you know, this is some older material, just to show you that they've known for a long time that SV40 blocks the effect of cancer treatments. And so there have been children who have died of SV40-related brain tumors. And the parents go and they do research. And this is what they have found. And so these are articles from like 1997. "So again, this is not something that top scientists should have bypassed. So the other brain cancers and solid cancers have been found to contain the SV40. And that the SV40 binds with the tumor-suppressor gene at p53, and it actually stops those tumor cells from undergoing what's called apoptosis, A-P-O-P-T-O-S-I-S, which really means programmed cell death. And that's how you're able to get cancer to regress, you know, when you're doing whatever you're doing traditionally. "Like, even if it's like, look, we know radiation does make tumor cells regress. Do they come back later? Most of the time, yes, they do cancer, you know, chemotherapy. Like, my father got chemotherapy when he had tumors all over his body. We got nine extra months with him, so I was okay with that. But did they all come back to kill him? Yes, they did, but I got an extra nine months. "But the point being that, you get that programmed cell death. But then if there's a P— If it's an SV40-related cancer especially, you're going to wind up with probably a turbo cancer at that point. "Yeah, I'm just going to read this to you because when I said that people knew about this and there were, you know, parents of children who developed brain tumors and testified in front of Congress. This was one of the very well-educated parents. Exposing SV40-positive cancer cells to chemo and radiation does not kill the cells, but simply creates more genetic mutations, making the cancer more aggressive. The bottom line is that SV40 causes human cancer, stops orthodox cancer treatments like chemo and radiation from providing any benefit and can make the cancer even more aggressive."
3:12

🚨Big problem! Dr. Suzanne Humphries: "Here's the real sucker punch... the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility... but SV40-associated cancer won't respond well... to chemotherapy... [in fact,] radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive...." This clip of Dr. Humphries (Dr Suzanne Humphries), a medical doctor, board-certified internist, nephrologist, and co-author of Dissolving Illusions, is taken from a presentation posted to the Children's Health Defense (Children’s Health Defense) Rumble channel on November 12, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "And here's the real sucker punch. So you remember how SV40 knocks out that p53 gene and protein, which I talked to you before, the cancer suppressor. And that means that not only can the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility, right? But SV40-associated cancer won't respond well at all to chemotherapy. "And conventional cancer treatments are likely to make cancer actually go wild and not regress because p53, it actually directs cancer cells to die off. It's necessary for chemo and especially for radiation to do the killing that they're supposed to be doing. And the fact that radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive is the entire reason it was used in the Get Castro project, right? You know, radiating the animals first and then doing the gain of function with radiation. That's why they did it. "So you know, this is some older material, just to show you that they've known for a long time that SV40 blocks the effect of cancer treatments. And so there have been children who have died of SV40-related brain tumors. And the parents go and they do research. And this is what they have found. And so these are articles from like 1997. "So again, this is not something that top scientists should have bypassed. So the other brain cancers and solid cancers have been found to contain the SV40. And that the SV40 binds with the tumor-suppressor gene at p53, and it actually stops those tumor cells from undergoing what's called apoptosis, A-P-O-P-T-O-S-I-S, which really means programmed cell death. And that's how you're able to get cancer to regress, you know, when you're doing whatever you're doing traditionally. "Like, even if it's like, look, we know radiation does make tumor cells regress. Do they come back later? Most of the time, yes, they do cancer, you know, chemotherapy. Like, my father got chemotherapy when he had tumors all over his body. We got nine extra months with him, so I was okay with that. But did they all come back to kill him? Yes, they did, but I got an extra nine months. "But the point being that, you get that programmed cell death. But then if there's a P— If it's an SV40-related cancer especially, you're going to wind up with probably a turbo cancer at that point. "Yeah, I'm just going to read this to you because when I said that people knew about this and there were, you know, parents of children who developed brain tumors and testified in front of Congress. This was one of the very well-educated parents. Exposing SV40-positive cancer cells to chemo and radiation does not kill the cells, but simply creates more genetic mutations, making the cancer more aggressive. The bottom line is that SV40 causes human cancer, stops orthodox cancer treatments like chemo and radiation from providing any benefit and can make the cancer even more aggressive."

Sense Receptor

53,395 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🚨 WHY ARE THERE OVER 400 PUBLISHED PAPERS ON IVERMECTIN AND CANCER? Because researchers discovered something unexpected. Ivermectin doesn't just target parasites. According to preclinical research, it appears to interact with cancer cells through multiple biological pathways. One of the most discussed? 📌 Cancer Stem Cells These are the cells believed to survive treatment, remain dormant for years, and potentially contribute to recurrence and spread. According to Dr. William Makis: 💊 Chemotherapy primarily targets rapidly dividing cancer cells. 💊 Ivermectin has been studied for its potential effects on cancer stem cells. That's why some researchers believe the combination deserves attention. But that's only part of the story. Researchers have also investigated ivermectin's potential ability to: ✅ Target cancer stem cells ✅ Influence tumor signaling pathways ✅ Alter cancer cell behavior ✅ Reverse chemotherapy resistance One of the most fascinating findings involves chemotherapy resistance. Over time, some cancer cells develop the ability to push chemotherapy drugs back out of the cell. Researchers have reported that ivermectin may interfere with these resistance mechanisms, potentially making cancer cells susceptible again. And then there's Fenbendazole and Mebendazole. While Ivermectin is being studied for one set of mechanisms, Fenbendazole and Mebendazole appear to work differently. Researchers have investigated their potential ability to: 📌 Block glucose transporters on cancer cells 📌 Reduce the cell's ability to use glucose as fuel 📌 Interfere with pathways associated with tumor growth Think about that. Different compounds. Different mechanisms. The same goal. That's why scientists continue publishing study after study. Not because these compounds are a fad. Because researchers keep uncovering new biological pathways worth investigating. And that's why the conversation around Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and Mebendazole continues to grow. 💊 If you’re looking into these drugs, check out Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and Mebendazole from RXMEDS.STORE. #Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #Mebendazole #CancerResearch #CancerStemCells #RepurposedDrugs #CancerBiology #RxMeds
3:32

🚨 WHY ARE THERE OVER 400 PUBLISHED PAPERS ON IVERMECTIN AND CANCER? Because researchers discovered something unexpected. Ivermectin doesn't just target parasites. According to preclinical research, it appears to interact with cancer cells through multiple biological pathways. One of the most discussed? 📌 Cancer Stem Cells These are the cells believed to survive treatment, remain dormant for years, and potentially contribute to recurrence and spread. According to Dr. William Makis: 💊 Chemotherapy primarily targets rapidly dividing cancer cells. 💊 Ivermectin has been studied for its potential effects on cancer stem cells. That's why some researchers believe the combination deserves attention. But that's only part of the story. Researchers have also investigated ivermectin's potential ability to: ✅ Target cancer stem cells ✅ Influence tumor signaling pathways ✅ Alter cancer cell behavior ✅ Reverse chemotherapy resistance One of the most fascinating findings involves chemotherapy resistance. Over time, some cancer cells develop the ability to push chemotherapy drugs back out of the cell. Researchers have reported that ivermectin may interfere with these resistance mechanisms, potentially making cancer cells susceptible again. And then there's Fenbendazole and Mebendazole. While Ivermectin is being studied for one set of mechanisms, Fenbendazole and Mebendazole appear to work differently. Researchers have investigated their potential ability to: 📌 Block glucose transporters on cancer cells 📌 Reduce the cell's ability to use glucose as fuel 📌 Interfere with pathways associated with tumor growth Think about that. Different compounds. Different mechanisms. The same goal. That's why scientists continue publishing study after study. Not because these compounds are a fad. Because researchers keep uncovering new biological pathways worth investigating. And that's why the conversation around Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and Mebendazole continues to grow. 💊 If you’re looking into these drugs, check out Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and Mebendazole from RXMEDS.STORE. #Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #Mebendazole #CancerResearch #CancerStemCells #RepurposedDrugs #CancerBiology #RxMeds

RXMEDS.STORE

16,612 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Can people in power/ authority kindly stop with this absolute BS on "fasting killing cancer cells" and citing religious nonsense to appeal to peoples emotions? Fasting is really quite dangerous for cancer patients in real life. Let me explain and bury this myth once and for all, especially for science illiterates like this guy. [1] The most common argument is that fasting "starves" cancer by cutting off its sugar (glucose) supply. While it is true that cancer cells consume vast amounts of glucose, they are biologically aggressive survivalists. If you stop eating, your body eventually switches to burning fat and breaking down muscle for energy. Cancer cells are highly adaptable; when glucose is low, many types of cancer can mutate to feed on other fuel sources, such as lactate, amino acids (from your muscles), or fatty acids. You cannot simply "starve" a tumor without starving the patient first. [2] Fasting is dangerous for cancer patients because of cancer cachexia - a wasting syndrome where the body loses muscle and fat rapidly. Cachexia is responsible for up to 30% of cancer deaths. Cancer puts the body in a hyper-metabolic state (burning energy fast). If a patient fasts, they risk accelerating muscle loss and weakening their immune system. A weak body cannot tolerate life-saving treatments like chemotherapy or radiation, nor can it fight off infections. [3] Most claims about fasting curing cancer come from studies on mice or cells in a petri dish. In a dish: You can kill cancer cells with almost anything (lemon juice, bleach, starvation, even shooting a bullet at it at close point or using a grenade to destroy the entire lab) because they have no immune system or body to protect them. In a human: The biology is infinitely more complex. Human metabolism, hormonal fluctuations, and tumor micro-environments mean that what shrinks a tumor in a mouse often fails completely in human trials. [4] Proponents often cite "autophagy" (the body's cellular recycling process triggered by fasting) as the cure. They claim it cleans out cancerous cells. Science shows that autophagy is a double-edged sword. -In all people, autophagy is a normal physiological process - whether fasting or not, which help in cleaning up damaged cells. -But in patients with cancer, once a tumor exists, cancer cells can actually hijack autophagy to survive stress (like chemotherapy) and repair themselves. In this context, fasting could theoretically help the cancer survive the treatment intended to kill it. [5] "Cancer" is not one disease; it is over 200 different diseases characterized by uncontrolled cell growth. Some cancers are driven by hormones, some by genetic mutations, and some by viruses. A fasting protocol that slows down one specific type of breast cancer might have zero effect on pancreatic cancer, or worse, accelerate a different type. The most lethal aspect of this misinformation is the delay in treatment. Cancer is a time-sensitive disease. While a patient spends months trying to fast the cancer away based on religious or alternative advice, the cancer often metastasizes (spreads) to other organs. Once cancer spreads, it often moves from being curable to being terminal. Relying solely on fasting wastes the critical window where medical intervention could have saved a life. Suggesting a single "ancient cure" for 200 complex genetic diseases is scientifically illogical... ...and generally stupid, as this video proves.
1:47

Can people in power/ authority kindly stop with this absolute BS on "fasting killing cancer cells" and citing religious nonsense to appeal to peoples emotions? Fasting is really quite dangerous for cancer patients in real life. Let me explain and bury this myth once and for all, especially for science illiterates like this guy. [1] The most common argument is that fasting "starves" cancer by cutting off its sugar (glucose) supply. While it is true that cancer cells consume vast amounts of glucose, they are biologically aggressive survivalists. If you stop eating, your body eventually switches to burning fat and breaking down muscle for energy. Cancer cells are highly adaptable; when glucose is low, many types of cancer can mutate to feed on other fuel sources, such as lactate, amino acids (from your muscles), or fatty acids. You cannot simply "starve" a tumor without starving the patient first. [2] Fasting is dangerous for cancer patients because of cancer cachexia - a wasting syndrome where the body loses muscle and fat rapidly. Cachexia is responsible for up to 30% of cancer deaths. Cancer puts the body in a hyper-metabolic state (burning energy fast). If a patient fasts, they risk accelerating muscle loss and weakening their immune system. A weak body cannot tolerate life-saving treatments like chemotherapy or radiation, nor can it fight off infections. [3] Most claims about fasting curing cancer come from studies on mice or cells in a petri dish. In a dish: You can kill cancer cells with almost anything (lemon juice, bleach, starvation, even shooting a bullet at it at close point or using a grenade to destroy the entire lab) because they have no immune system or body to protect them. In a human: The biology is infinitely more complex. Human metabolism, hormonal fluctuations, and tumor micro-environments mean that what shrinks a tumor in a mouse often fails completely in human trials. [4] Proponents often cite "autophagy" (the body's cellular recycling process triggered by fasting) as the cure. They claim it cleans out cancerous cells. Science shows that autophagy is a double-edged sword. -In all people, autophagy is a normal physiological process - whether fasting or not, which help in cleaning up damaged cells. -But in patients with cancer, once a tumor exists, cancer cells can actually hijack autophagy to survive stress (like chemotherapy) and repair themselves. In this context, fasting could theoretically help the cancer survive the treatment intended to kill it. [5] "Cancer" is not one disease; it is over 200 different diseases characterized by uncontrolled cell growth. Some cancers are driven by hormones, some by genetic mutations, and some by viruses. A fasting protocol that slows down one specific type of breast cancer might have zero effect on pancreatic cancer, or worse, accelerate a different type. The most lethal aspect of this misinformation is the delay in treatment. Cancer is a time-sensitive disease. While a patient spends months trying to fast the cancer away based on religious or alternative advice, the cancer often metastasizes (spreads) to other organs. Once cancer spreads, it often moves from being curable to being terminal. Relying solely on fasting wastes the critical window where medical intervention could have saved a life. Suggesting a single "ancient cure" for 200 complex genetic diseases is scientifically illogical... ...and generally stupid, as this video proves.

TheLiverDoc™

192,961 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Cancer - Chemotherapy wipes out the cells that "protect your body from cancer" For decades, the fundamental protocol for fighting cancer has been chemotherapy and radiation. But what if this approach inadvertently disarms the body's most powerful weapon against the very disease it seeks to destroy? Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong explains the profound and simple truth: When a patient undergoes chemotherapy, it systematically wipes out critical components of the immune system. 1. It wipes out red blood cells, causing anemia. We have a drug for that: Epogen. 2. It wipes out neutrophils, which prevent infection. We have a drug for that: Neupogen. 3. But most critically, it decimates the lymphocytes—the NK and T cells. Here lies the devastating irony: The NK and T cells are the only cells in the human body that can recognize and kill cancer. So, within days, the standard of care eliminates the patient's primary defense system. For 35 years, we have treated the side effects of anemia and infection, all while having no therapy to restore the very cells that matter most. Dr. Soon-Shiong’s two-decade fight has been to illuminate this paradigm. We have been unintentionally protecting the patient from the consequences of our own treatments while undermining their innate ability to survive. This principle extends beyond oncology. In Long COVID, a similar pattern emerges—a viral infection that cleverly disables the T and NK cells. The lesson is clear: The future of medicine lies not in breaking the body down, but in strategically rebuilding and empowering its innate intelligence. It’s a call to move beyond managing collateral damage and to start fortifying the core of our biological defenses.
1:47

Cancer - Chemotherapy wipes out the cells that "protect your body from cancer" For decades, the fundamental protocol for fighting cancer has been chemotherapy and radiation. But what if this approach inadvertently disarms the body's most powerful weapon against the very disease it seeks to destroy? Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong explains the profound and simple truth: When a patient undergoes chemotherapy, it systematically wipes out critical components of the immune system. 1. It wipes out red blood cells, causing anemia. We have a drug for that: Epogen. 2. It wipes out neutrophils, which prevent infection. We have a drug for that: Neupogen. 3. But most critically, it decimates the lymphocytes—the NK and T cells. Here lies the devastating irony: The NK and T cells are the only cells in the human body that can recognize and kill cancer. So, within days, the standard of care eliminates the patient's primary defense system. For 35 years, we have treated the side effects of anemia and infection, all while having no therapy to restore the very cells that matter most. Dr. Soon-Shiong’s two-decade fight has been to illuminate this paradigm. We have been unintentionally protecting the patient from the consequences of our own treatments while undermining their innate ability to survive. This principle extends beyond oncology. In Long COVID, a similar pattern emerges—a viral infection that cleverly disables the T and NK cells. The lesson is clear: The future of medicine lies not in breaking the body down, but in strategically rebuilding and empowering its innate intelligence. It’s a call to move beyond managing collateral damage and to start fortifying the core of our biological defenses.

Camus

61,712 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

For most women, the benefits of taking body identical HRT far outweigh any risks. Yet many are reluctant to take it and many doctors are also reluctant to prescribe it. This is usually due to a false belief that HRT is too risky and causes breast cancer. I am sharing with you this paper that has recently been published looking at oestrogen-only HRT and breast cancer incidence. The paper is a meta-analysis, which is a type of statistical analysis where researchers review, combine, and analyse multiple studies together. In this paper, researchers have looked at randomised studies involving oestrogen and breast cancer incidence and put them together to see what the results show. The conclusion is clear: women who take oestrogen-only HRT have a LOWER future risk of developing breast cancer. We’ve known for several years that women who take oestrogen have a lower future incidence of breast cancer as well as other cancers and other conditions. This paper is very reassuring, and it’s worth remembering that any risk of breast cancer has been shown using oestrogen with a combination of a synthetic progestogen, not the body-identical type progesterone healthcare professionals usually prescribe.
1:31

For most women, the benefits of taking body identical HRT far outweigh any risks. Yet many are reluctant to take it and many doctors are also reluctant to prescribe it. This is usually due to a false belief that HRT is too risky and causes breast cancer. I am sharing with you this paper that has recently been published looking at oestrogen-only HRT and breast cancer incidence. The paper is a meta-analysis, which is a type of statistical analysis where researchers review, combine, and analyse multiple studies together. In this paper, researchers have looked at randomised studies involving oestrogen and breast cancer incidence and put them together to see what the results show. The conclusion is clear: women who take oestrogen-only HRT have a LOWER future risk of developing breast cancer. We’ve known for several years that women who take oestrogen have a lower future incidence of breast cancer as well as other cancers and other conditions. This paper is very reassuring, and it’s worth remembering that any risk of breast cancer has been shown using oestrogen with a combination of a synthetic progestogen, not the body-identical type progesterone healthcare professionals usually prescribe.

Dr Louise Newson

23,758 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

The Dangerous Cult of 'Fasting' Influencers. Fasting has its anecdotal benefits, yes. But it is overrated. And water fasting is highly overrated. But this video featuring a Cardiologist is amusingly nonsense. There is no study from Boston (from a "University?" - how vague!) that says 7-days water fasting reduces risk of cancer (what cancer?) by 70%. And there is no proof that fasting kills cancer cells in humans. Here is what fasting does to cancers in humans. Nothing. Fasting is now become a sort of religion-like cult for wellness influencers to rake in views and engagement. From a scientific standpoint, there are no realistically good human studies to prove anything from fasting that benefits cancers. I know, I know, "autophagy" and all that. Autophagy: Autophagy is the natural, conserved degradation of the cell that removes unnecessary or dysfunctional components. Yes, its a legit term and all. But in the context of cancer reduction and fasting in humans, it sounds like "immunity boosting," another wellness fraud term. The effects of fasting on cancer cells are all based on MOUSE studies, and none explicitly translated to humans. See this paper: everything is based on cells and tissues and small animal experiments: "While research on the subject is tantalizing, there’s little clinical evidence involving humans to substantiate the claims. Studies on the potential impacts on cancer treatment from various forms of fasting or calorie restriction, including the possibility that they reduce side effects, have been limited." "Fasting may not be appropriate for malnourished individuals or those with cancer cachexia, which results in a continuing loss of skeletal muscle mass, or for people with chronic diseases. Those with diabetes need to be very careful, because of the risk of hypoglycemia." "Based on our systematic review and meta-analysis, there is currently no evidence supporting the superiority of therapeutic fasting over non-fasting in preventing chemotherapy toxicity." - see here: Even intermittent fasting (IF) is overrated in cancer. "IF may be considered in adults seeking cancer-prevention benefits through means of weight management, butwhether IF itself affects cancer-related metabolic and molecular pathways remains unanswered. See here: Also this: "Fasting for short periods does not have any beneficial effect on the quality of life of cancer patients during treatment. Evidence on fasting regimes reducing side effects and toxicities of chemotherapy is missing." See here: The whole aspect of "fasting reducing cancer incidence" in the real world is just due to weight loss. Obesity is associated with at least 13 types of cancers and reversing obesity reduces risk of cancer - nothing to do with fasting killing off cancers cells in the body. And one can lose weight even without fasting. See here: Everything from prevention of adverse events of cancer, to reduction in side effects from chemotherapy, to slowing cancer growth by reducing glucose levels, to promoting cell regeneration by affecting autophagy is all LAB BASED MOLECULAR LEVEL HYPOTHESIS that has not been proven conclusively in humans. See here: Cancer patients must not starve. They must remain hydrated and they must eat a well balanced diet because cancer condition is highly demanding. And dont water fast for 7 days. Easy for people to make reels on it, but in real life, it may prove disastrous. Water fast does make you lose weight (because of starvation) but it is not at all a healthy way to lose weight. Stop with this fasting and cancer madness already.
0:21

The Dangerous Cult of 'Fasting' Influencers. Fasting has its anecdotal benefits, yes. But it is overrated. And water fasting is highly overrated. But this video featuring a Cardiologist is amusingly nonsense. There is no study from Boston (from a "University?" - how vague!) that says 7-days water fasting reduces risk of cancer (what cancer?) by 70%. And there is no proof that fasting kills cancer cells in humans. Here is what fasting does to cancers in humans. Nothing. Fasting is now become a sort of religion-like cult for wellness influencers to rake in views and engagement. From a scientific standpoint, there are no realistically good human studies to prove anything from fasting that benefits cancers. I know, I know, "autophagy" and all that. Autophagy: Autophagy is the natural, conserved degradation of the cell that removes unnecessary or dysfunctional components. Yes, its a legit term and all. But in the context of cancer reduction and fasting in humans, it sounds like "immunity boosting," another wellness fraud term. The effects of fasting on cancer cells are all based on MOUSE studies, and none explicitly translated to humans. See this paper: everything is based on cells and tissues and small animal experiments: "While research on the subject is tantalizing, there’s little clinical evidence involving humans to substantiate the claims. Studies on the potential impacts on cancer treatment from various forms of fasting or calorie restriction, including the possibility that they reduce side effects, have been limited." "Fasting may not be appropriate for malnourished individuals or those with cancer cachexia, which results in a continuing loss of skeletal muscle mass, or for people with chronic diseases. Those with diabetes need to be very careful, because of the risk of hypoglycemia." "Based on our systematic review and meta-analysis, there is currently no evidence supporting the superiority of therapeutic fasting over non-fasting in preventing chemotherapy toxicity." - see here: Even intermittent fasting (IF) is overrated in cancer. "IF may be considered in adults seeking cancer-prevention benefits through means of weight management, butwhether IF itself affects cancer-related metabolic and molecular pathways remains unanswered. See here: Also this: "Fasting for short periods does not have any beneficial effect on the quality of life of cancer patients during treatment. Evidence on fasting regimes reducing side effects and toxicities of chemotherapy is missing." See here: The whole aspect of "fasting reducing cancer incidence" in the real world is just due to weight loss. Obesity is associated with at least 13 types of cancers and reversing obesity reduces risk of cancer - nothing to do with fasting killing off cancers cells in the body. And one can lose weight even without fasting. See here: Everything from prevention of adverse events of cancer, to reduction in side effects from chemotherapy, to slowing cancer growth by reducing glucose levels, to promoting cell regeneration by affecting autophagy is all LAB BASED MOLECULAR LEVEL HYPOTHESIS that has not been proven conclusively in humans. See here: Cancer patients must not starve. They must remain hydrated and they must eat a well balanced diet because cancer condition is highly demanding. And dont water fast for 7 days. Easy for people to make reels on it, but in real life, it may prove disastrous. Water fast does make you lose weight (because of starvation) but it is not at all a healthy way to lose weight. Stop with this fasting and cancer madness already.

TheLiverDoc™

269,452 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

"Taking An Aspirin Everyday To Prevent A Heart Attack Is Wrong, Dangerous & Can Be Deadly." Dr Jack Wolfson, Cardiologist "A Daily Aspirin Is A Lie That's Been Fed To Us For Over 50 Years." "Aspirin Does Not Protect You Or Fix Your Damaged Arteries...It Just Makes You Bleed." Almost 30 million Americans take aspirin for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or colorectal cancer (CRC). For decades, low dose Aspirin has been prescribed to patients as primary prevention for patients at risk for CVD, but has now been withdrawn as a line of treatment or prevention. The most recent recommendations from the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) have abandoned the routine call for daily aspirin use because of the harms that daily low dose aspirin causes. Research From The ARRIVE, ASPREE & ASCEND Peer Reviewed Studies, Confirms That Daily Aspirin, Even Low Dose 'Baby Aspirin,' Is Harmful & Causes Major Bleeding: More than 46,000 adults were studied for multiple years on low dose enteric coated 100 mg aspirin & found significant major bleeding while also finding no benefit for cardiovascular disease. The causal factor of the increased risk of bleeding is aspirin inhibits platelet activity as a COX-1 inhibitor, which damages the protective layer of gastrointestinal mucosa, intracranial brain tissue & micro bleeding anemia. 1⃣ Increased risk of major bleeding: This includes gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (e.g., ulcers, bleeding in the stomach or intestines) & intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain), which can be severe & life-threatening. 2⃣ Hemorrhagic stroke: Aspirin increases the risk of hemorrhagic strokes, where a blood vessel bursts in the brain. Bleeding events were 38% higher among participants who were taking aspirin daily, regardless of their gender, age, or cardiovascular risk. 3⃣ Anemia: The ASPREE trial, showed 20% increase in Anemia, characterized by low red blood cell counts & symptoms like fatigue & weakness. Slow micro bleeding anemia as low Hemoglobin iron & Ferritin levels plummeting to less than 45 mcg/L. 4⃣ Gastrointestinal damage: Aspirin, even at low doses, causes damage to the lining of the stomach & intestines, leading to erosions, ulcers & bleeding. Research participant data showed 60% had major GI bleeds as a result of a daily low dose aspirin. 👇ASCEND Aspirin Bleeding Risk Study👇 👇Daily Low Dose Aspirin Causes Anemia👇 👇ASPREE Low Dose Aspirin Causes GI Bleeding👇 Speaker: Dr Jack Wolfson, MD
2:09

"Taking An Aspirin Everyday To Prevent A Heart Attack Is Wrong, Dangerous & Can Be Deadly." Dr Jack Wolfson, Cardiologist "A Daily Aspirin Is A Lie That's Been Fed To Us For Over 50 Years." "Aspirin Does Not Protect You Or Fix Your Damaged Arteries...It Just Makes You Bleed." Almost 30 million Americans take aspirin for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or colorectal cancer (CRC). For decades, low dose Aspirin has been prescribed to patients as primary prevention for patients at risk for CVD, but has now been withdrawn as a line of treatment or prevention. The most recent recommendations from the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) have abandoned the routine call for daily aspirin use because of the harms that daily low dose aspirin causes. Research From The ARRIVE, ASPREE & ASCEND Peer Reviewed Studies, Confirms That Daily Aspirin, Even Low Dose 'Baby Aspirin,' Is Harmful & Causes Major Bleeding: More than 46,000 adults were studied for multiple years on low dose enteric coated 100 mg aspirin & found significant major bleeding while also finding no benefit for cardiovascular disease. The causal factor of the increased risk of bleeding is aspirin inhibits platelet activity as a COX-1 inhibitor, which damages the protective layer of gastrointestinal mucosa, intracranial brain tissue & micro bleeding anemia. 1⃣ Increased risk of major bleeding: This includes gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (e.g., ulcers, bleeding in the stomach or intestines) & intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain), which can be severe & life-threatening. 2⃣ Hemorrhagic stroke: Aspirin increases the risk of hemorrhagic strokes, where a blood vessel bursts in the brain. Bleeding events were 38% higher among participants who were taking aspirin daily, regardless of their gender, age, or cardiovascular risk. 3⃣ Anemia: The ASPREE trial, showed 20% increase in Anemia, characterized by low red blood cell counts & symptoms like fatigue & weakness. Slow micro bleeding anemia as low Hemoglobin iron & Ferritin levels plummeting to less than 45 mcg/L. 4⃣ Gastrointestinal damage: Aspirin, even at low doses, causes damage to the lining of the stomach & intestines, leading to erosions, ulcers & bleeding. Research participant data showed 60% had major GI bleeds as a result of a daily low dose aspirin. 👇ASCEND Aspirin Bleeding Risk Study👇 👇Daily Low Dose Aspirin Causes Anemia👇 👇ASPREE Low Dose Aspirin Causes GI Bleeding👇 Speaker: Dr Jack Wolfson, MD

Valerie Anne Smith

209,490 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, a pioneering surgeon and scientist, reveals a shocking truth about chemotherapy, immunity, and why we’ve been fighting cancer the wrong way for decades. Here’s what’s simple—and profound: When you undergo chemotherapy, the first casualty is your red blood cells, leading to anemia (treated with Epogen). Next, it wipes out neutrophils, leaving you vulnerable to infection (treated with Neupogen). But the most devastating effect? It destroys your NK and T cells—your body’s elite cancer-fighting forces. Think about that: The very treatment meant to kill cancer also annihilates the only cells that can actually protect you from it. For 35 years, medicine has ignored this paradox. We replace red blood cells and neutrophils—but not the lymphocytes that matter most. The result? A weakened immune system, vulnerable to relapse and secondary cancers. Now, consider long COVID. The virus is cunning—it targets the same NK and T cells, crippling immunity. The parallel is undeniable: Weakening these cells leaves the body defenseless, whether from chemo or chronic infection. Dr. Soon-Shiong’s message is clear: "We’ve been treating cancer wrong." The future lies in restoring immune function, not just attacking tumors. The fight isn’t just against cancer or viruses—it’s for the immune system itself. And after 20 years of challenging the status quo, Dr. Soon-Shiong is leading that revolution. It’s time to rethink everything.
1:47

Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, a pioneering surgeon and scientist, reveals a shocking truth about chemotherapy, immunity, and why we’ve been fighting cancer the wrong way for decades. Here’s what’s simple—and profound: When you undergo chemotherapy, the first casualty is your red blood cells, leading to anemia (treated with Epogen). Next, it wipes out neutrophils, leaving you vulnerable to infection (treated with Neupogen). But the most devastating effect? It destroys your NK and T cells—your body’s elite cancer-fighting forces. Think about that: The very treatment meant to kill cancer also annihilates the only cells that can actually protect you from it. For 35 years, medicine has ignored this paradox. We replace red blood cells and neutrophils—but not the lymphocytes that matter most. The result? A weakened immune system, vulnerable to relapse and secondary cancers. Now, consider long COVID. The virus is cunning—it targets the same NK and T cells, crippling immunity. The parallel is undeniable: Weakening these cells leaves the body defenseless, whether from chemo or chronic infection. Dr. Soon-Shiong’s message is clear: "We’ve been treating cancer wrong." The future lies in restoring immune function, not just attacking tumors. The fight isn’t just against cancer or viruses—it’s for the immune system itself. And after 20 years of challenging the status quo, Dr. Soon-Shiong is leading that revolution. It’s time to rethink everything.

Camus

327,541 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

“You see pink ribbons everywhere... events designed to make large amounts of money” 🚨Before you donate to a cancer charity, hear this. World Renowned Cancer Biologist Professor Thomas Seyfried reveals how fundraising efforts prop up a failed system. Hard earned and well intentioned money goes into “debunked” areas of research.... unknowingly contributing to a system stuck on the old story of cancer. SEYFRIED - “The more money we raise for breast cancer, the more people dying from breast cancer we get.... the money is being misspent on a therapy, or a strategy that's already been debunked” “You have to ask the organizations that raise money... what do you do with the money? Are you investing it in the therapies based on the somatic mutation gene theory? Or are you investing it in programs that recognize cancer as a metabolic mitochondrial metabolic disease.... ” “When you find out that most of the money is going to cancer research involving gene mutations, now you can understand why we have no progress... and we get more and more de-d people year in and year out”.
3:01

“You see pink ribbons everywhere... events designed to make large amounts of money” 🚨Before you donate to a cancer charity, hear this. World Renowned Cancer Biologist Professor Thomas Seyfried reveals how fundraising efforts prop up a failed system. Hard earned and well intentioned money goes into “debunked” areas of research.... unknowingly contributing to a system stuck on the old story of cancer. SEYFRIED - “The more money we raise for breast cancer, the more people dying from breast cancer we get.... the money is being misspent on a therapy, or a strategy that's already been debunked” “You have to ask the organizations that raise money... what do you do with the money? Are you investing it in the therapies based on the somatic mutation gene theory? Or are you investing it in programs that recognize cancer as a metabolic mitochondrial metabolic disease.... ” “When you find out that most of the money is going to cancer research involving gene mutations, now you can understand why we have no progress... and we get more and more de-d people year in and year out”.

Humanspective

20,892 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

"Biopsies Spread Cancer...Biopsies Are The Kiss Of Death. The Needle Punches A Hole In The Tumor, Dragging Cancer Cells & Spreading Them." Dr Ben Johnson Doctors Finally Admit That The Very Test Being Pushed On Patients Is Causing Cancer To Metastasize All Throughout The Body. The body self-contains a tumor within a fibrin sheath. A needle biopsy breaks the seal of the tumor that kept it contained & allows the pathogenic toxins &/or parasites to be unleashed. When a hornet's nest is poked, it doesn't calm the hive...it angers & scatters. That’s what happens when a needle pierces a tumor. Cancer cells are dragged into new territory, inflammation flares, the immune system gets distracted, and the “nest” gets angrier. Cells are dragged along the needle tract. Local inflammation activates tumor growth. The immune system is suppressed & cancer cells invade tissue, blood & lymph. Biopsies trigger metastasis, inflammation & tumor seeding: "Biopsy of primary tumors resulted in significantly increased incidence & number of lung metastasis."(PMID 25061543) "Biopsies promote intraperitoneal tumor dissemination & progression." (PMID 23258276) "Core needle biopsy of breast tumors increases distant metastases. (PMID 25425969) "Biopsies lead to tumor cell dissemination & seeding of malignant tumors." (PMID 22686607) "Human breast cancer biopsies enhance adjacent cancer cell proliferation." (PMID 27249999) Top Doctors Are Now Admitting 'That Standard Of Care' Is Killing Patients: "Manipulation of an intact tumor...is associated with an increase in the incidence of sentinel node metastasis." (John Wayne Cancer Institute 2022) "Cutting out a section...endangered the person's life by aggravating the malignant growth." (Dr Perry Nichols) "Biopsies spread early cancers." (Dr Jonathan Wright) "Biopsies introduce cancer cells into the bloodstream." (Dr Leonard Gomella) "Biopsies cause cancer cells to spread & the risk is higher in certain types of cancers like prostate & kidney cancers." (Dr Hal Schofield) "Biopsies cause cancer to disseminate further into the body & this has serious implications to patient outcomes." (Dr Robert Nagourney) Alternative Tests That Do Not Disturb Fibrin Sheath Of The Encapsulated Tumor: 1⃣ Multiparametric MRI (pmMRI): Non-invasive. No ionizing radiation. Detects structure & function in high resolution. 2⃣ Color Doppler Ultrasound: Maps tumor blood flow in real time. No radiation. No compression damage. 3⃣ Liquid Biopsy (ctDNA /CTC Testing): Blood test for cancer DNA or cells. No mechanical disruption of tumors. 4⃣ Thermography: Non-radiation, non-invasive technique that uses infrared cameras to detect heat patterns in tumors. Information is anti-fear. Knowledge is power. It gives you choices. It gives you power. If you’ve been diagnosed, please don’t rush. Research. Ask questions. Trust your intuition. Sometimes slowing down is the most urgent thing you can do. The cancer industrial complex is a powerful profit model & needs a massive overhaul. Too many patients blindly walk into these procedures without informed consent, never being told the risks. You can choose to not disturb the tumor at all & instead implement a protocol to shrink & enable the body to eradicate the tumor all together. Many cases of cancer tumors are actually parasitic eggs sacs misdiagnosed as cancer. There are ways to diagnose cancer without the risk of spread & acceleration. And ways to prevent & treat cancer without the harm of Chemotherapy & Radiation. There is a groundbreaking protocol by Dr William Makis, Dr Paul Marik & others that uses Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, Methylene Blue, Fasting, Ketogenic Diet & other proven cancer remission strategies that addresses cancer & parasites simultaneously. ⏩ ⏪ 👇Seeding Tumor Cells Into Metastasis👇 👇Needle Biopsy Promotes Metastasis👇 👇Needle Biopsy Accelerates Cancer👇 Speaker: Justin Stellman
1:32

"Biopsies Spread Cancer...Biopsies Are The Kiss Of Death. The Needle Punches A Hole In The Tumor, Dragging Cancer Cells & Spreading Them." Dr Ben Johnson Doctors Finally Admit That The Very Test Being Pushed On Patients Is Causing Cancer To Metastasize All Throughout The Body. The body self-contains a tumor within a fibrin sheath. A needle biopsy breaks the seal of the tumor that kept it contained & allows the pathogenic toxins &/or parasites to be unleashed. When a hornet's nest is poked, it doesn't calm the hive...it angers & scatters. That’s what happens when a needle pierces a tumor. Cancer cells are dragged into new territory, inflammation flares, the immune system gets distracted, and the “nest” gets angrier. Cells are dragged along the needle tract. Local inflammation activates tumor growth. The immune system is suppressed & cancer cells invade tissue, blood & lymph. Biopsies trigger metastasis, inflammation & tumor seeding: "Biopsy of primary tumors resulted in significantly increased incidence & number of lung metastasis."(PMID 25061543) "Biopsies promote intraperitoneal tumor dissemination & progression." (PMID 23258276) "Core needle biopsy of breast tumors increases distant metastases. (PMID 25425969) "Biopsies lead to tumor cell dissemination & seeding of malignant tumors." (PMID 22686607) "Human breast cancer biopsies enhance adjacent cancer cell proliferation." (PMID 27249999) Top Doctors Are Now Admitting 'That Standard Of Care' Is Killing Patients: "Manipulation of an intact tumor...is associated with an increase in the incidence of sentinel node metastasis." (John Wayne Cancer Institute 2022) "Cutting out a section...endangered the person's life by aggravating the malignant growth." (Dr Perry Nichols) "Biopsies spread early cancers." (Dr Jonathan Wright) "Biopsies introduce cancer cells into the bloodstream." (Dr Leonard Gomella) "Biopsies cause cancer cells to spread & the risk is higher in certain types of cancers like prostate & kidney cancers." (Dr Hal Schofield) "Biopsies cause cancer to disseminate further into the body & this has serious implications to patient outcomes." (Dr Robert Nagourney) Alternative Tests That Do Not Disturb Fibrin Sheath Of The Encapsulated Tumor: 1⃣ Multiparametric MRI (pmMRI): Non-invasive. No ionizing radiation. Detects structure & function in high resolution. 2⃣ Color Doppler Ultrasound: Maps tumor blood flow in real time. No radiation. No compression damage. 3⃣ Liquid Biopsy (ctDNA /CTC Testing): Blood test for cancer DNA or cells. No mechanical disruption of tumors. 4⃣ Thermography: Non-radiation, non-invasive technique that uses infrared cameras to detect heat patterns in tumors. Information is anti-fear. Knowledge is power. It gives you choices. It gives you power. If you’ve been diagnosed, please don’t rush. Research. Ask questions. Trust your intuition. Sometimes slowing down is the most urgent thing you can do. The cancer industrial complex is a powerful profit model & needs a massive overhaul. Too many patients blindly walk into these procedures without informed consent, never being told the risks. You can choose to not disturb the tumor at all & instead implement a protocol to shrink & enable the body to eradicate the tumor all together. Many cases of cancer tumors are actually parasitic eggs sacs misdiagnosed as cancer. There are ways to diagnose cancer without the risk of spread & acceleration. And ways to prevent & treat cancer without the harm of Chemotherapy & Radiation. There is a groundbreaking protocol by Dr William Makis, Dr Paul Marik & others that uses Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, Methylene Blue, Fasting, Ketogenic Diet & other proven cancer remission strategies that addresses cancer & parasites simultaneously. ⏩ ⏪ 👇Seeding Tumor Cells Into Metastasis👇 👇Needle Biopsy Promotes Metastasis👇 👇Needle Biopsy Accelerates Cancer👇 Speaker: Justin Stellman

Valerie Anne Smith

768,769 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

A toxicologist's devastating testimony on how COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could cause cancer and alter the human gene pool. This is a must-read. Dr. Lindsay Janci just laid out a harrowing case. The concern isn't just short-term side effects; it's the potential for genetic vaccines to drive cancer and be passed to future generations. Her summary is a masterclass in scientific alarm. Here are the 9+ potential pathways to cancer she detailed: 1. LNP Delivery to Stem Cells: Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) don't just go to muscle cells. They readily transfect hemopoietic stem cells—the origin of all our blood cells. 2. Cancer Metastasis: LNPs may cause pre-existing cancer cells to spread more easily by inducing "endothelial leakiness." 3. Inherent LNP Oncogenicity: The LNPs themselves might have cancer-causing effects, which have never been studied. 4. The SV40 Promoter: Hidden plasmid DNA in the vaccines contains the powerful SV40 promoter. If this genetic switch integrates near an oncogene, it could explosively drive cancer growth. 5. SV40 Enhancer (Nuclear Targeting): This sequence is designed to rush DNA into the cell nucleus—a key step for "insertional mutagenesis," where foreign DNA disrupts our own genes. 6. Spike Protein & p53: The spike protein itself has been shown to inhibit p53, a critical tumor suppressor protein that stops cancer from developing. 7. Insertional Mutagenesis & Frameshifts: Plasmid DNA doesn't need SV40 to get into the nucleus. Once integrated, it can cause frameshift mutations, leading to aberrant, cancer-causing proteins. 8. mRNA Reverse Transcription: The mRNA can be reverse-transcribed back into DNA and integrated into our genome, a known cancer mechanism, especially in ovaries & testes where reverse transcriptase is high. 9. Immunosuppression: The vaccines may suppress specialized T-cells that act as "guards" keeping dormant cancer clones in check. Weakening this guard can lead to a surge in cancers, similar to what we see in aging pets. But it gets worse. Dr. Janci issued a grave warning about heritable genetic damage: The DNA plasmids and reverse-transcribed DNA can potentially integrate into sperm and ova (gametes). This means the genetic payload could be passed to our children and "contaminate the gene pool." She reveals two mechanisms: - Genomic Integration: Direct insertion into the gamete's DNA, likely causing cancer in offspring rather than functional spike production. . Sperm-Mediated Gene Transfer (SMGT): A process where sperm can carry extra-chromosomal DNA and pass it on to the next generation without full genomic integration, leading to constitutive spike protein expression in children. The most chilling part? Dr. Janci states that this is "not being investigated at all." Despite reaching out to multiple labs, no one is testing sperm or ova from vaccinated individuals for these integrations. This isn't conspiracy theory. This is a credentialed toxicologist presenting a plausible, mechanistic roadmap for a public health catastrophe. The absolute lack of curiosity from health agencies is deafening. The question is no longer if there are risks, but why those in charge are refusing to look.
8:42

A toxicologist's devastating testimony on how COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could cause cancer and alter the human gene pool. This is a must-read. Dr. Lindsay Janci just laid out a harrowing case. The concern isn't just short-term side effects; it's the potential for genetic vaccines to drive cancer and be passed to future generations. Her summary is a masterclass in scientific alarm. Here are the 9+ potential pathways to cancer she detailed: 1. LNP Delivery to Stem Cells: Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) don't just go to muscle cells. They readily transfect hemopoietic stem cells—the origin of all our blood cells. 2. Cancer Metastasis: LNPs may cause pre-existing cancer cells to spread more easily by inducing "endothelial leakiness." 3. Inherent LNP Oncogenicity: The LNPs themselves might have cancer-causing effects, which have never been studied. 4. The SV40 Promoter: Hidden plasmid DNA in the vaccines contains the powerful SV40 promoter. If this genetic switch integrates near an oncogene, it could explosively drive cancer growth. 5. SV40 Enhancer (Nuclear Targeting): This sequence is designed to rush DNA into the cell nucleus—a key step for "insertional mutagenesis," where foreign DNA disrupts our own genes. 6. Spike Protein & p53: The spike protein itself has been shown to inhibit p53, a critical tumor suppressor protein that stops cancer from developing. 7. Insertional Mutagenesis & Frameshifts: Plasmid DNA doesn't need SV40 to get into the nucleus. Once integrated, it can cause frameshift mutations, leading to aberrant, cancer-causing proteins. 8. mRNA Reverse Transcription: The mRNA can be reverse-transcribed back into DNA and integrated into our genome, a known cancer mechanism, especially in ovaries & testes where reverse transcriptase is high. 9. Immunosuppression: The vaccines may suppress specialized T-cells that act as "guards" keeping dormant cancer clones in check. Weakening this guard can lead to a surge in cancers, similar to what we see in aging pets. But it gets worse. Dr. Janci issued a grave warning about heritable genetic damage: The DNA plasmids and reverse-transcribed DNA can potentially integrate into sperm and ova (gametes). This means the genetic payload could be passed to our children and "contaminate the gene pool." She reveals two mechanisms: - Genomic Integration: Direct insertion into the gamete's DNA, likely causing cancer in offspring rather than functional spike production. . Sperm-Mediated Gene Transfer (SMGT): A process where sperm can carry extra-chromosomal DNA and pass it on to the next generation without full genomic integration, leading to constitutive spike protein expression in children. The most chilling part? Dr. Janci states that this is "not being investigated at all." Despite reaching out to multiple labs, no one is testing sperm or ova from vaccinated individuals for these integrations. This isn't conspiracy theory. This is a credentialed toxicologist presenting a plausible, mechanistic roadmap for a public health catastrophe. The absolute lack of curiosity from health agencies is deafening. The question is no longer if there are risks, but why those in charge are refusing to look.

Camus

18,244 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

“It’s essentially vaccinating yourself against your own tumor.” Dr. William Li just described a groundbreaking new approach on The Beyond Tomorrow Podcast. They remove your tumor, sequence its genome along with your normal cells, use AI to identify the unique cancer mutations, then create a personalized vaccine from those mutations and inject it back into you — training your immune system to attack your own cancer like a precision-guided missile. This is already in clinical trials. In recent personalized mRNA cancer vaccine trials (e.g., for melanoma and kidney cancer), patients who responded showed strong, durable T-cell responses, with many remaining cancer-free for 3+ years. Some studies reported recurrence-free survival rates significantly higher than standard treatments. We’re moving from blunt-force chemo to hyper-personalized immunotherapy that uses your own biology as the weapon. Have you heard about the rapid progress in personalized cancer vaccines?
2:46

“It’s essentially vaccinating yourself against your own tumor.” Dr. William Li just described a groundbreaking new approach on The Beyond Tomorrow Podcast. They remove your tumor, sequence its genome along with your normal cells, use AI to identify the unique cancer mutations, then create a personalized vaccine from those mutations and inject it back into you — training your immune system to attack your own cancer like a precision-guided missile. This is already in clinical trials. In recent personalized mRNA cancer vaccine trials (e.g., for melanoma and kidney cancer), patients who responded showed strong, durable T-cell responses, with many remaining cancer-free for 3+ years. Some studies reported recurrence-free survival rates significantly higher than standard treatments. We’re moving from blunt-force chemo to hyper-personalized immunotherapy that uses your own biology as the weapon. Have you heard about the rapid progress in personalized cancer vaccines?

Camus

125,744 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce