Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

A few days ago, I published some thoughts on the different types of professionals who react to Kim Taehyung’s work. The focus was on understanding how some maintain their professional integrity even when facing attacks, while others eventually cave to social media pressure. In this case, this visual director...

musicmapv's profile picture

Music Map ⓥ

4,712 subscribers

16,269 görüntüleme • 24 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Ostriches are intensely social animals who understand their world through movement contact and the presence of their flock. They do not experience life with human concepts or human language but they do experience fear safety comfort and distress in ways that are clear measurable and deeply felt. When ostriches live together they learn the shapes sounds and movements of the birds around them. They feel secure when the flock is calm and they become anxious when others show signs of alarm. Their sense of safety depends entirely on the stability of the group. Any threat to one member of the flock creates a wave of fear through all of them. Because of this the emotional impact of violent handling and mass killing is not limited to the bird that is struck but spreads through every ostrich who sees hears or senses it. When force and confinement are imposed on them the birds experience a level of fear that overwhelms their natural coping behaviors. Ostriches respond to danger with flight or alert stillness and when neither response is possible they enter a state of acute stress that includes trembling pacing vocalizing or freezing in place. Their hearts race their muscles tense and their entire body prepares to escape. When they are surrounded or trapped they cannot understand why the danger cannot be avoided. The sense of helplessness for a prey animal is not a thought but a physical shock that floods them with stress and panic. To a creature who survives through movement and awareness the loss of space and the inability to flee is a form of suffering in itself. The abuse of forcing ostriches to witness the injury or death of familiar flock mates creates another layer of distress. These birds recognize individuals. They notice when one of their companions collapses or cries out. They become restless and agitated when a bird they know is harmed. They remain close to fallen birds and often attempt to investigate or stay near them because their instinct pushes them to stay with the group even when the group is being destroyed. The emotional meaning of this moment is not symbolic but immediate. The flock is breaking apart. The cues of danger multiply. The birds see others in pain or falling and their own fear grows with each new sign of suffering. When violent killing happens around them ostriches sense it as the collapse of their only system of safety. They are not built to make sense of destruction happening in their own flock. Instead they respond with escalating panic. Their bodies show it clearly through rapid breathing frantic shifts in posture and attempts to move closer to surviving flock mates. They do not understand why the danger continues or why the people near them are the source of harm. The stress they experience is intense enough to cause physical shock. Their final moments are dominated by confusion fear and the overwhelming instinct to escape a threat that cannot be avoided. The public often imagines large animals as numb or unaware but ostriches feel the world with a sensitivity shaped by millions of years as prey animals. Their eyes are sharp their hearing is attuned to stress in others and their bodies react strongly to fear and pain. When dozens or hundreds of birds are subjected to violence in a confined area every ostrich feels the fear of the others. The suffering does not happen to them one by one but as a shared experience of terror. This is an experience that no animal should ever be forced to endure. The reality is not clinical or quick. It is emotionally devastating to the animals caught in it because it destroys the flock bond that is their only sense of stability and then it destroys the birds themselves. Understanding this matters because it shows that the harm done to these animals was not only physical but deeply emotional. The ostriches suffered long before any final action was taken against their bodies. They suffered through fear they could not escape through the panic created by the collapse of their flock and through the helplessness of being unable to understand why the world around them suddenly turned violent. Recognizing this is essential because it reveals the true scale of what was done. This was not a neutral procedure. This was the infliction of terror on beings capable of feeling it powerfully. The public deserves to know that these birds were not indifferent creatures. They were living animals who felt fear and confusion and distress and whose final experiences were shaped by violence they could not comprehend or escape.
3:46

Ostriches are intensely social animals who understand their world through movement contact and the presence of their flock. They do not experience life with human concepts or human language but they do experience fear safety comfort and distress in ways that are clear measurable and deeply felt. When ostriches live together they learn the shapes sounds and movements of the birds around them. They feel secure when the flock is calm and they become anxious when others show signs of alarm. Their sense of safety depends entirely on the stability of the group. Any threat to one member of the flock creates a wave of fear through all of them. Because of this the emotional impact of violent handling and mass killing is not limited to the bird that is struck but spreads through every ostrich who sees hears or senses it. When force and confinement are imposed on them the birds experience a level of fear that overwhelms their natural coping behaviors. Ostriches respond to danger with flight or alert stillness and when neither response is possible they enter a state of acute stress that includes trembling pacing vocalizing or freezing in place. Their hearts race their muscles tense and their entire body prepares to escape. When they are surrounded or trapped they cannot understand why the danger cannot be avoided. The sense of helplessness for a prey animal is not a thought but a physical shock that floods them with stress and panic. To a creature who survives through movement and awareness the loss of space and the inability to flee is a form of suffering in itself. The abuse of forcing ostriches to witness the injury or death of familiar flock mates creates another layer of distress. These birds recognize individuals. They notice when one of their companions collapses or cries out. They become restless and agitated when a bird they know is harmed. They remain close to fallen birds and often attempt to investigate or stay near them because their instinct pushes them to stay with the group even when the group is being destroyed. The emotional meaning of this moment is not symbolic but immediate. The flock is breaking apart. The cues of danger multiply. The birds see others in pain or falling and their own fear grows with each new sign of suffering. When violent killing happens around them ostriches sense it as the collapse of their only system of safety. They are not built to make sense of destruction happening in their own flock. Instead they respond with escalating panic. Their bodies show it clearly through rapid breathing frantic shifts in posture and attempts to move closer to surviving flock mates. They do not understand why the danger continues or why the people near them are the source of harm. The stress they experience is intense enough to cause physical shock. Their final moments are dominated by confusion fear and the overwhelming instinct to escape a threat that cannot be avoided. The public often imagines large animals as numb or unaware but ostriches feel the world with a sensitivity shaped by millions of years as prey animals. Their eyes are sharp their hearing is attuned to stress in others and their bodies react strongly to fear and pain. When dozens or hundreds of birds are subjected to violence in a confined area every ostrich feels the fear of the others. The suffering does not happen to them one by one but as a shared experience of terror. This is an experience that no animal should ever be forced to endure. The reality is not clinical or quick. It is emotionally devastating to the animals caught in it because it destroys the flock bond that is their only sense of stability and then it destroys the birds themselves. Understanding this matters because it shows that the harm done to these animals was not only physical but deeply emotional. The ostriches suffered long before any final action was taken against their bodies. They suffered through fear they could not escape through the panic created by the collapse of their flock and through the helplessness of being unable to understand why the world around them suddenly turned violent. Recognizing this is essential because it reveals the true scale of what was done. This was not a neutral procedure. This was the infliction of terror on beings capable of feeling it powerfully. The public deserves to know that these birds were not indifferent creatures. They were living animals who felt fear and confusion and distress and whose final experiences were shaped by violence they could not comprehend or escape.

Vote Canada

55,531 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

• We saw some parents reassuring their children that what was happening was just military training or fireworks, in order to protect them from anxiety. Some may disagree with me, but I believe that today's generation lives in an open world, with phones and social media in their hands revealing what is happening moment by moment. The idea is not to scare children, but to enhance their psychological security through age-appropriate honesty. Educational studies indicate that when children discover the truth later from external sources -such as the internet or friends - after being told something different, they may feel confused or lose some of their trust. Therefore, a calm and honest explanation promotes psychological stability and gives them a sense of security and confidence. It is important for children to learn the truth from their parents first, rather than receiving it from platforms that may be filled with misinformation or distorted narratives that reach them in a way that contradicts the truth. We must raise our children to be aware, not ignorant, and teach them from an early age who stands with their homeland and who attacks it, and make them understand the meaning of defending the homeland and the value of the sacrifices made to protect its security and stability. Strong nations are not built by military force alone, but by a conscious generation with a strong sense of belonging, who know the truth about who stands with their homeland and who is hostile to it, and who stand by it with conviction and pride. •
1:06

• We saw some parents reassuring their children that what was happening was just military training or fireworks, in order to protect them from anxiety. Some may disagree with me, but I believe that today's generation lives in an open world, with phones and social media in their hands revealing what is happening moment by moment. The idea is not to scare children, but to enhance their psychological security through age-appropriate honesty. Educational studies indicate that when children discover the truth later from external sources -such as the internet or friends - after being told something different, they may feel confused or lose some of their trust. Therefore, a calm and honest explanation promotes psychological stability and gives them a sense of security and confidence. It is important for children to learn the truth from their parents first, rather than receiving it from platforms that may be filled with misinformation or distorted narratives that reach them in a way that contradicts the truth. We must raise our children to be aware, not ignorant, and teach them from an early age who stands with their homeland and who attacks it, and make them understand the meaning of defending the homeland and the value of the sacrifices made to protect its security and stability. Strong nations are not built by military force alone, but by a conscious generation with a strong sense of belonging, who know the truth about who stands with their homeland and who is hostile to it, and who stand by it with conviction and pride. •

Dr. Fatima Alkaabi

14,749 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

This World Cup has shown how Argentinian players are just built different, and it was interesting because, in the press conferences, both managers addressed this. First, Tuchel talks about the Argentinian value of the ball and how they protect the ball at all costs, how they manage those small spaces, and how they learn this from a young age. He references culture, and this is exactly it. A child playing in a certain environment leads to that. Not every Argentinian child is on the national team, but it raises the ceiling. It creates a certain type of style and a certain type of player. Then Scaloni also references his culture. He sees them play without fear of losing. It comes from playing in an environment where you are constantly faced with the potential of losing and being able to play with that pressure, right? They don’t fight against it. They play with it. They use it. And I think this is where youth football coaches should really take note. This does not mean we should copy and paste Argentinian culture into every training environment, because culture cannot just be copied. But the values within that culture can be inculcated in every training environment. The value of the ball. The courage to receive it in small spaces. The ability to protect it under pressure. The confidence to keep playing after a mistake. The willingness to play with the possibility of losing rather than constantly trying to avoid it. Those values can become part of the environment we create every day. They can be present in the games we design, in what we praise, in what we allow players to struggle with, and in how we respond when they lose the ball. If every mistake leads to the coach stopping the session, giving the answer, or taking the pressure away, then players never learn to play with that pressure. They learn to wait for the coach. It was cool to see how two managers, at such a big stage, reference culture and the environments that kids play in when they’re young. Because the players we see on the biggest stage were not only created by tactics or coaching information. They were created by environments that taught them what to value, how to relate to the ball, and how to play when there was something to lose.
1:47

This World Cup has shown how Argentinian players are just built different, and it was interesting because, in the press conferences, both managers addressed this. First, Tuchel talks about the Argentinian value of the ball and how they protect the ball at all costs, how they manage those small spaces, and how they learn this from a young age. He references culture, and this is exactly it. A child playing in a certain environment leads to that. Not every Argentinian child is on the national team, but it raises the ceiling. It creates a certain type of style and a certain type of player. Then Scaloni also references his culture. He sees them play without fear of losing. It comes from playing in an environment where you are constantly faced with the potential of losing and being able to play with that pressure, right? They don’t fight against it. They play with it. They use it. And I think this is where youth football coaches should really take note. This does not mean we should copy and paste Argentinian culture into every training environment, because culture cannot just be copied. But the values within that culture can be inculcated in every training environment. The value of the ball. The courage to receive it in small spaces. The ability to protect it under pressure. The confidence to keep playing after a mistake. The willingness to play with the possibility of losing rather than constantly trying to avoid it. Those values can become part of the environment we create every day. They can be present in the games we design, in what we praise, in what we allow players to struggle with, and in how we respond when they lose the ball. If every mistake leads to the coach stopping the session, giving the answer, or taking the pressure away, then players never learn to play with that pressure. They learn to wait for the coach. It was cool to see how two managers, at such a big stage, reference culture and the environments that kids play in when they’re young. Because the players we see on the biggest stage were not only created by tactics or coaching information. They were created by environments that taught them what to value, how to relate to the ball, and how to play when there was something to lose.

David Garcia

170,334 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Elon Musk: We will not accept an anointed class of journalists who tell us what to think. “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Interview with the BBC, April 12, 2023
0:57

Elon Musk: We will not accept an anointed class of journalists who tell us what to think. “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Interview with the BBC, April 12, 2023

ELON CLIPS

1,266,090 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

ELON: WE WILL NOT ACCEPT AN ANOINTED CLASS OF JOURNALISTS WHO TELL US WHAT TO THINK “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023, Elon Musk
0:57

ELON: WE WILL NOT ACCEPT AN ANOINTED CLASS OF JOURNALISTS WHO TELL US WHAT TO THINK “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023, Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

115,251 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Andrew Tate and the BBC Presenter According to the victim's mother, an alleged involvement of a BBC presenter has surfaced in obtaining explicit images of a minor. The BBC still have not released the name. They claim to be investigating the veracity of the claim, even though they knew about this since May, and the presenter has remained on air to date. This comes after Philip Schofield was protected by the mainstream media, and we were told to consider his mental health. The question is, do they give everyone the same benefit of the doubt? The answer is no. When it came to Andrew Tate, he was vilified in the media despite there being no substantial evidence. Despite the fact it took 15 months to investigate and 7 months of some form of detention. There are people who are protected, and then there are others who are destroyed. It all depends on who is part of the 'Matrix' and who is considered a problem.
0:51

Andrew Tate and the BBC Presenter According to the victim's mother, an alleged involvement of a BBC presenter has surfaced in obtaining explicit images of a minor. The BBC still have not released the name. They claim to be investigating the veracity of the claim, even though they knew about this since May, and the presenter has remained on air to date. This comes after Philip Schofield was protected by the mainstream media, and we were told to consider his mental health. The question is, do they give everyone the same benefit of the doubt? The answer is no. When it came to Andrew Tate, he was vilified in the media despite there being no substantial evidence. Despite the fact it took 15 months to investigate and 7 months of some form of detention. There are people who are protected, and then there are others who are destroyed. It all depends on who is part of the 'Matrix' and who is considered a problem.

Sulaiman Ahmed

1,131,868 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.
3:03

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

300,719 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

As a black belt, this is how I prefer to roll, not driven by personal development or even the enjoyment of it. I roll because it is good in and of itself. I strive to give of myself generously and to take what comes my way openly, without apology. Most of my time on the mat is spent guiding others, helping them navigate Jiu Jitsu. But when it’s my turn to roll, it becomes an experience that exists purely for its own sake. Jiu Jitsu is a ritual, not an outlet for pent-up emotions, nor is it a stage for personal theatrics. It transcends the release or display of personality. If anything, it functions as an escape from emotion and personality. Within this space of calm detachment, there emerges a kind of vision or fluency. This vision is the capacity to take the unpredictable and the unforeseen and seamlessly integrate it in a way that brings new meaning and value. Instead of feeling destabilized by the unexpected, allow it to deepen your perspective. The question is not how to avoid disruptions, but how to dance with them, absorb them, and become more adaptable through the encounter.
2:03

As a black belt, this is how I prefer to roll, not driven by personal development or even the enjoyment of it. I roll because it is good in and of itself. I strive to give of myself generously and to take what comes my way openly, without apology. Most of my time on the mat is spent guiding others, helping them navigate Jiu Jitsu. But when it’s my turn to roll, it becomes an experience that exists purely for its own sake. Jiu Jitsu is a ritual, not an outlet for pent-up emotions, nor is it a stage for personal theatrics. It transcends the release or display of personality. If anything, it functions as an escape from emotion and personality. Within this space of calm detachment, there emerges a kind of vision or fluency. This vision is the capacity to take the unpredictable and the unforeseen and seamlessly integrate it in a way that brings new meaning and value. Instead of feeling destabilized by the unexpected, allow it to deepen your perspective. The question is not how to avoid disruptions, but how to dance with them, absorb them, and become more adaptable through the encounter.

Drewlock

22,484 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Elon Musk: It shouldn't be up to a few media oligarchs to steer the narrative. “The biggest point of manipulation that occurs in the media is not when the media says something that's false or misleading – they do that – but their choice of narrative. What are they going to talk about? By choosing to focus on one thing and not focus on another thing, they're steering what information the public receives. Whereas, I think the right thing is that the narratives that are important should be the narratives that the people as a whole think are important, not what a few media oligarchs think is important. But they sure like controlling information.” Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, October 19, 2024
0:42

Elon Musk: It shouldn't be up to a few media oligarchs to steer the narrative. “The biggest point of manipulation that occurs in the media is not when the media says something that's false or misleading – they do that – but their choice of narrative. What are they going to talk about? By choosing to focus on one thing and not focus on another thing, they're steering what information the public receives. Whereas, I think the right thing is that the narratives that are important should be the narratives that the people as a whole think are important, not what a few media oligarchs think is important. But they sure like controlling information.” Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, October 19, 2024

ELON CLIPS

2,288,898 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Was on #NDTV last night on the Nashik TCS issue. The matter is sub juice now and let law take it's course. However some matters have come to light and that's what I shared with the anchor-Shiv Aroor who was professional and not part of any communal "slugfest". ​The narrative of "Corporate Jihad" attempts to blame an entire community for the alleged actions of a few individuals. ​Point is If harassment occurred over two years, why did the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) or HR department not act? This is a failure of POSH (Prevention of Sexual Harassment) compliance, not a religious conspiracy. ​People are aware that workplace harassment is a systemic issue affecting women across industries, regardless of the perpetrator's religion. Using a communal lens distracts from the urgent need to make corporate spaces safer for all women. Entry into firms like TCS is based on rigorous testing and merit. To suggest a coordinated religious "infiltration" insults the professional integrity of the thousands of minority professionals who contribute to India's GDP and tech leadership.
5:18

Was on #NDTV last night on the Nashik TCS issue. The matter is sub juice now and let law take it's course. However some matters have come to light and that's what I shared with the anchor-Shiv Aroor who was professional and not part of any communal "slugfest". ​The narrative of "Corporate Jihad" attempts to blame an entire community for the alleged actions of a few individuals. ​Point is If harassment occurred over two years, why did the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) or HR department not act? This is a failure of POSH (Prevention of Sexual Harassment) compliance, not a religious conspiracy. ​People are aware that workplace harassment is a systemic issue affecting women across industries, regardless of the perpetrator's religion. Using a communal lens distracts from the urgent need to make corporate spaces safer for all women. Entry into firms like TCS is based on rigorous testing and merit. To suggest a coordinated religious "infiltration" insults the professional integrity of the thousands of minority professionals who contribute to India's GDP and tech leadership.

Saira Shah Halim সায়রা ‏‎‎سائرہ

83,248 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Sectarian Gaza candidates are a natural result of mass immigration of strong cultures into a continent which had lost confidence in its own. Had Europe maintained a strong identity and a dominant culture, perhaps integration would have been possible, and imported minority cultures would not have been able to become dominant. Clearly, British students are in fact able to find meaning in identity, but they are unable to find it in being British because they have no sense of what that is. In many cases they now find their identity in the culture that, despite being a minority culture, is a strong and therefore meaningful one (to them). They find identity and meaning in being pro Palestine, anti Israel, pro mass immigration and, importantly, anti anyone who doesn’t conform to it. By making that demand for conformity very clear to others, there is a generation of young people, in particular young women, whose political stances are based on the pressure to conform to this identity. Their conformity is rewarded with the power of becoming an enforcer, making the identity even more appealing.
1:30

Sectarian Gaza candidates are a natural result of mass immigration of strong cultures into a continent which had lost confidence in its own. Had Europe maintained a strong identity and a dominant culture, perhaps integration would have been possible, and imported minority cultures would not have been able to become dominant. Clearly, British students are in fact able to find meaning in identity, but they are unable to find it in being British because they have no sense of what that is. In many cases they now find their identity in the culture that, despite being a minority culture, is a strong and therefore meaningful one (to them). They find identity and meaning in being pro Palestine, anti Israel, pro mass immigration and, importantly, anti anyone who doesn’t conform to it. By making that demand for conformity very clear to others, there is a generation of young people, in particular young women, whose political stances are based on the pressure to conform to this identity. Their conformity is rewarded with the power of becoming an enforcer, making the identity even more appealing.

Connie Shaw

16,456 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Listen to this segment of the New Statesman Podcast (Sep 26, 2025). While attempting to couch their language in such a way as to imply the right is wrong about everything, they fully admit that Liz Truss was completely snaked by the Bank of England and this raises a constitutional crisis in our country: Should it be the elected government who dictates economic policy or should it be the unelected Bank of England? This is a serious and weighty question to which there is actually an obvious answer, and they admit that the cruelty by which Truss was dealt with by the left was wholly inappropriate because Starmer's government is facing the exact same problem. It's quite a shocking listen because it reveals the sheer partisanship of the them-vs-us attitude of the liberal elites and their worship of the system as opposed to any normal Brit who actually thinks the country ought to work for the people first. If the system is not serving us then the system must change, but instead they admit the system decided it would take action against the government instead to protect itself. This is completely unacceptable, and they admit it.
3:31

Listen to this segment of the New Statesman Podcast (Sep 26, 2025). While attempting to couch their language in such a way as to imply the right is wrong about everything, they fully admit that Liz Truss was completely snaked by the Bank of England and this raises a constitutional crisis in our country: Should it be the elected government who dictates economic policy or should it be the unelected Bank of England? This is a serious and weighty question to which there is actually an obvious answer, and they admit that the cruelty by which Truss was dealt with by the left was wholly inappropriate because Starmer's government is facing the exact same problem. It's quite a shocking listen because it reveals the sheer partisanship of the them-vs-us attitude of the liberal elites and their worship of the system as opposed to any normal Brit who actually thinks the country ought to work for the people first. If the system is not serving us then the system must change, but instead they admit the system decided it would take action against the government instead to protect itself. This is completely unacceptable, and they admit it.

Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

270,194 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

3 Different Types of Outlier Founders. Alfred Lin (Alfred Lin), Sequoia 1.) Dreamer 2.) Problem-Solver 3.) Technical “One of the things I really love doing is working with founders.. I love to hear their unique & novel insights. I love to hear how deeply they studied the market or the industry, even though they're an outsider. I think founders fall into three different buckets. - There's the person who's a dreamer. They just can paint this beautiful vision of the future, & you just get enticed by that. - There are people who solve their own problem, & I love riffing with them on that particular problem. - And then there are founders who are very technical & they can describe the technology, but they're less good with explaining what the business is. And I try to help each of those three in different ways.”
0:37

3 Different Types of Outlier Founders. Alfred Lin (Alfred Lin), Sequoia 1.) Dreamer 2.) Problem-Solver 3.) Technical “One of the things I really love doing is working with founders.. I love to hear their unique & novel insights. I love to hear how deeply they studied the market or the industry, even though they're an outsider. I think founders fall into three different buckets. - There's the person who's a dreamer. They just can paint this beautiful vision of the future, & you just get enticed by that. - There are people who solve their own problem, & I love riffing with them on that particular problem. - And then there are founders who are very technical & they can describe the technology, but they're less good with explaining what the business is. And I try to help each of those three in different ways.”

Molly O’Shea

33,235 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Elon Musk: Information should bubble up from the people, not be decided by a few editors-in-chief. “We should have the free marketplace of ideas. People can propose an idea, people can discuss an idea. They can make a statement, people can rebut that. The people can decide. And I think it's far better for information to bubble up from the voice of the people than to be decided by a handful of editors-in-chief of newspapers. The biggest point of manipulation that occurs in the media is not when the media says something that's false or misleading – because they do that – but their choice of narrative, what are they going to talk about. By choosing to focus on one thing and not focus on another thing, they're steering what information the public receives. I think the right thing is that the narratives that are important should be the narratives that the people as a whole think are important, not what a few media oligarchs think is important. But they sure like controlling information.” Town Hall in Harrisburg, October 19, 2024
1:22

Elon Musk: Information should bubble up from the people, not be decided by a few editors-in-chief. “We should have the free marketplace of ideas. People can propose an idea, people can discuss an idea. They can make a statement, people can rebut that. The people can decide. And I think it's far better for information to bubble up from the voice of the people than to be decided by a handful of editors-in-chief of newspapers. The biggest point of manipulation that occurs in the media is not when the media says something that's false or misleading – because they do that – but their choice of narrative, what are they going to talk about. By choosing to focus on one thing and not focus on another thing, they're steering what information the public receives. I think the right thing is that the narratives that are important should be the narratives that the people as a whole think are important, not what a few media oligarchs think is important. But they sure like controlling information.” Town Hall in Harrisburg, October 19, 2024

ELON CLIPS

25,147 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

🇵🇱 Grzegorz Braun, when asked "How to reconcile Poles?" replied that should give up reconciling Poles because not all inhabitants of Poland are Poles, perhaps many or even most of them are not Poles. ,,First, it's important to note that not all Polish residents are Poles. Perhaps quite a few, or even the majority, are simply Eurokolhoznians, Ukropolinians. These are people content with their status as natives in some colony, state, or bantustan, and there's no point in arguing or complaining about it, that's just the way it is. It is important that those who are and want to be Poles and raise their children in a Polish way to be Poles, so that they can regain control over their own lives, the life of the nation and the state." - Grzegorz Braun.
0:57

🇵🇱 Grzegorz Braun, when asked "How to reconcile Poles?" replied that should give up reconciling Poles because not all inhabitants of Poland are Poles, perhaps many or even most of them are not Poles. ,,First, it's important to note that not all Polish residents are Poles. Perhaps quite a few, or even the majority, are simply Eurokolhoznians, Ukropolinians. These are people content with their status as natives in some colony, state, or bantustan, and there's no point in arguing or complaining about it, that's just the way it is. It is important that those who are and want to be Poles and raise their children in a Polish way to be Poles, so that they can regain control over their own lives, the life of the nation and the state." - Grzegorz Braun.

Based Poland 🇵🇱

26,786 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

If the government keeps saying "there is no link between immigration and crime", well then they're essentially saying this abundance of human beings did not exist or matter, hence victimising them a second time through the cover ups and lies. I say "human beings" and not just "victims" because these women, men and adults are not just defined by an image we see, or by an act of extreme violence, they are defined by their own full and beautiful lives (and the mark they made on this world and their loved ones) on a journey that was cut short. I've often said that I believe one of the most cruel indignities visited upon a person who is murdered is the fact that their name is rarely spoken again without being permanently tethered to the person or people who took their life so cruelly. I don't know what account to tag on x to thank for this video as the link itself was not sent to me, but I appreciate the level of effort put in to keep these cases in the public eye. It is heartening to know there's people out there trying to do what's right (when there's so many others ignoring or denying what is going on).
4:05

If the government keeps saying "there is no link between immigration and crime", well then they're essentially saying this abundance of human beings did not exist or matter, hence victimising them a second time through the cover ups and lies. I say "human beings" and not just "victims" because these women, men and adults are not just defined by an image we see, or by an act of extreme violence, they are defined by their own full and beautiful lives (and the mark they made on this world and their loved ones) on a journey that was cut short. I've often said that I believe one of the most cruel indignities visited upon a person who is murdered is the fact that their name is rarely spoken again without being permanently tethered to the person or people who took their life so cruelly. I don't know what account to tag on x to thank for this video as the link itself was not sent to me, but I appreciate the level of effort put in to keep these cases in the public eye. It is heartening to know there's people out there trying to do what's right (when there's so many others ignoring or denying what is going on).

Susanne Delaney

11,054 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The kind of Catholicism practiced by Italians is the result of a profound inculturation that has been ongoing for many centuries. Italians are not a rigid or logical people. Their world is one of deep passions, emotions, and festive exuberance. It's only natural then that the religion they practice would be shaped and influenced by that temperament. That the Catholic Church has successfully managed to do this is a testimony to its enduring ability to be a truly universal faith, not a narrow and parochial one. It's a tragic shame that so many outsiders seem unable to perceive this and instead hurl insults and condemnations because they are either too close-minded or ignorant to understand (or even desire to) how such a unique expression of a religion could have been created and continue to exist, nourishing those who partake in it.
2:58

The kind of Catholicism practiced by Italians is the result of a profound inculturation that has been ongoing for many centuries. Italians are not a rigid or logical people. Their world is one of deep passions, emotions, and festive exuberance. It's only natural then that the religion they practice would be shaped and influenced by that temperament. That the Catholic Church has successfully managed to do this is a testimony to its enduring ability to be a truly universal faith, not a narrow and parochial one. It's a tragic shame that so many outsiders seem unable to perceive this and instead hurl insults and condemnations because they are either too close-minded or ignorant to understand (or even desire to) how such a unique expression of a religion could have been created and continue to exist, nourishing those who partake in it.

Robert Kearney

185,126 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce