正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

A guy built a guitar where the strings float on magnets. push the magnet sideways -> every note bends at once the first version was plastic. it collapsed under the string tension almost immediately so he rebuilt it in metal, and the thing actually worked what he found after...

Banff_eth's profile picture

Banff

2,217 subscribers

317,724 次观看 • 21 天前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术音乐
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

a shape with no inside. he filled it with water anyway pour water in and it stops almost immediately. the air has nowhere to escape, so it just sits there blocking you. tilt it and you get a little more in, then it blocks again so he put the whole thing in a vacuum chamber turn it on and the bottle starts bubbling. that's the air being pulled out through the neck, leaving as close to nothing inside as he can get then he lets the pressure back in, and the water rushes up into the empty space on its own still not full. so he runs it again, rarefying the smaller pocket of air that's left, and again after that here's the part that breaks your head: for a shape to have volume, it has to split the world in two. a ball does that. stretch it however you want, there's always a world inside and a world outside a Klein bottle has no such line. follow its surface and you never cross a boundary, never pass through a wall, never end up anywhere that isn't the same side you started on the inside is the outside. so there's nothing there to fill he filled it anyway that's the same shape as the room below. no plot, no payoff, just a question your brain won't drop -> can a thing with no inside hold anything at all two videos, two impossible questions, 20 million views between them. Paone broke down why this format works in the article underneath save this. the most watched thing today was a shape that shouldn't be able to hold anything, holding water
2:39

a shape with no inside. he filled it with water anyway pour water in and it stops almost immediately. the air has nowhere to escape, so it just sits there blocking you. tilt it and you get a little more in, then it blocks again so he put the whole thing in a vacuum chamber turn it on and the bottle starts bubbling. that's the air being pulled out through the neck, leaving as close to nothing inside as he can get then he lets the pressure back in, and the water rushes up into the empty space on its own still not full. so he runs it again, rarefying the smaller pocket of air that's left, and again after that here's the part that breaks your head: for a shape to have volume, it has to split the world in two. a ball does that. stretch it however you want, there's always a world inside and a world outside a Klein bottle has no such line. follow its surface and you never cross a boundary, never pass through a wall, never end up anywhere that isn't the same side you started on the inside is the outside. so there's nothing there to fill he filled it anyway that's the same shape as the room below. no plot, no payoff, just a question your brain won't drop -> can a thing with no inside hold anything at all two videos, two impossible questions, 20 million views between them. Paone broke down why this format works in the article underneath save this. the most watched thing today was a shape that shouldn't be able to hold anything, holding water

Banff

2,564,940 次观看 • 20 天前

Copper doesn’t stick to magnets but that doesn’t mean it can’t react to one. Drop a magnet through a copper tube and watch what happens: it falls surprisingly slowly. The moving magnet changes the magnetic field inside the copper, creating tiny electrical currents that push back against its motion. No magnetism in the copper itself. Just physics doing its thing.
0:44

Copper doesn’t stick to magnets but that doesn’t mean it can’t react to one. Drop a magnet through a copper tube and watch what happens: it falls surprisingly slowly. The moving magnet changes the magnetic field inside the copper, creating tiny electrical currents that push back against its motion. No magnetism in the copper itself. Just physics doing its thing.

Truthseeker

22,633 次观看 • 8 天前

A physics professor ran a live demonstration on national television in 1964 and it went wrong on camera. He didn't cut away. He got happier. This is Julius Sumner Miller on the ABC program Why Is It So?, crushing a reinforced metal tank with atmospheric pressure. The experiment refuses to behave. Watch his face when it fails. No embarrassment, no apology to the audience, no reshoot. Failure was the interesting part and he wanted the camera on it. Every engineer who hides a broken demo, every team that only ships the run that worked, is doing the opposite of what this man did on live TV 62 years ago. The physics is simple: air pressure you can't feel, doing work you can't ignore. He makes it visible with a tank and a heat source. A hardware engineer I know sent this clip to his team after a failed launch demo with 1 line: this is how you handle it. Black and white, 1 camera, free on YouTube since 2018. He wasn't performing certainty. That's why it still plays.
10:17

A physics professor ran a live demonstration on national television in 1964 and it went wrong on camera. He didn't cut away. He got happier. This is Julius Sumner Miller on the ABC program Why Is It So?, crushing a reinforced metal tank with atmospheric pressure. The experiment refuses to behave. Watch his face when it fails. No embarrassment, no apology to the audience, no reshoot. Failure was the interesting part and he wanted the camera on it. Every engineer who hides a broken demo, every team that only ships the run that worked, is doing the opposite of what this man did on live TV 62 years ago. The physics is simple: air pressure you can't feel, doing work you can't ignore. He makes it visible with a tank and a heat source. A hardware engineer I know sent this clip to his team after a failed launch demo with 1 line: this is how you handle it. Black and white, 1 camera, free on YouTube since 2018. He wasn't performing certainty. That's why it still plays.

Merlow

11,676 次观看 • 28 天前

$384,317 in 28 days, and all he did was fix what the algorithm was already telling him for free He built a tool with Claude that reads the signal most people upload right past > feed it a channel URL, get a score out of 100 in seconds > real RPM of the niche, per-video earnings, SEO and monetization gaps > it flags priorities like a missing keyword or no lead magnet > real API data, not guesses The data was always there, free, in the dashboard he just built something that reads it like a consultant would, then fixed the top thing first
1:13

$384,317 in 28 days, and all he did was fix what the algorithm was already telling him for free He built a tool with Claude that reads the signal most people upload right past > feed it a channel URL, get a score out of 100 in seconds > real RPM of the niche, per-video earnings, SEO and monetization gaps > it flags priorities like a missing keyword or no lead magnet > real API data, not guesses The data was always there, free, in the dashboard he just built something that reads it like a consultant would, then fixed the top thing first

Kiyoro

14,162 次观看 • 2 个月前

The cold is British. They just never told you. ❄️🇬🇧 Every air conditioner, every fridge, every freezer on earth, the cold inside all of it was first made by a Scotsman. In 1756. ❄️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 His name was William Cullen, a doctor in Edinburgh. In a warm room, with no ice and no winter, he drew the air from a glass of ether until it boiled cold and drank the heat from the water around it, until the water froze. No one had ever done it before. Then he wrote it down and walked away. No machine, no patent, no fortune. Just the proof, on a bench. It sat there the better part of a century. A British bench built the first machine that worked, and a Scot carried it across the world to Australia, where it froze meat and cooled beer. But cold was only half the story. ❄️📖 To master the air itself took another Scot. When the Houses of Parliament burned down in 1834, David Boswell Reid made the new building breathe, its gothic spires its lungs. At St George's Hall in Liverpool in 1851 he built what is often called the first air-conditioned building on earth. It should have made him. He died forgotten in America instead. 40 years on, Willis Carrier built the machine and earned his name as the father of modern air conditioning. He earned every bit of it. But he did not make the cold. The cold was British. America took that inheritance and cooled the world with it, and that is no theft. That is what an inheritance is for. We are the home of British heroes. Not built by ads, not by the government, built by us. There's a place for you with us. Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧
4:44

The cold is British. They just never told you. ❄️🇬🇧 Every air conditioner, every fridge, every freezer on earth, the cold inside all of it was first made by a Scotsman. In 1756. ❄️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 His name was William Cullen, a doctor in Edinburgh. In a warm room, with no ice and no winter, he drew the air from a glass of ether until it boiled cold and drank the heat from the water around it, until the water froze. No one had ever done it before. Then he wrote it down and walked away. No machine, no patent, no fortune. Just the proof, on a bench. It sat there the better part of a century. A British bench built the first machine that worked, and a Scot carried it across the world to Australia, where it froze meat and cooled beer. But cold was only half the story. ❄️📖 To master the air itself took another Scot. When the Houses of Parliament burned down in 1834, David Boswell Reid made the new building breathe, its gothic spires its lungs. At St George's Hall in Liverpool in 1851 he built what is often called the first air-conditioned building on earth. It should have made him. He died forgotten in America instead. 40 years on, Willis Carrier built the machine and earned his name as the father of modern air conditioning. He earned every bit of it. But he did not make the cold. The cold was British. America took that inheritance and cooled the world with it, and that is no theft. That is what an inheritance is for. We are the home of British heroes. Not built by ads, not by the government, built by us. There's a place for you with us. Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧

Proudofus.uk

56,349 次观看 • 1 个月前

A man and his kids and just hanging out at the house. Earlier they were outside trying out their new trampoline. Kids get excited and loud while jumping on those so it isn’t surprising that it happened in this case as well. One of the neighbors doesn’t seem to like it when the kids are outside playing on the trampoline so they called the cops and reported it to seem like he was harming them and that’s why they were screaming. So at this point he has a trampoline in the backyard that he can’t use without the neighbor calling the cops and reporting him.
0:30

A man and his kids and just hanging out at the house. Earlier they were outside trying out their new trampoline. Kids get excited and loud while jumping on those so it isn’t surprising that it happened in this case as well. One of the neighbors doesn’t seem to like it when the kids are outside playing on the trampoline so they called the cops and reported it to seem like he was harming them and that’s why they were screaming. So at this point he has a trampoline in the backyard that he can’t use without the neighbor calling the cops and reporting him.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

320,127 次观看 • 6 个月前

Tom Hopkins failed so badly at his first sales job he almost quit for construction. Then he changed one thing and sold over 6,000 homes, more than almost anyone alive. He filmed the whole method, and it's free. He wasn't a natural. He was broke, awkward, and losing. What turned it around wasn't charm or a script. It was treating persuasion as a craft with rules, the same way a trade has steps. His core idea is quieter than the usual sales hype. People don't say no to the thing. They say no to a feeling, a doubt they can't name. The job isn't to push harder. It's to find the real objection hiding under the polite one, and answer that. That sounds simple until you watch how precise he is. Every objection has a shape. Every shape has a response. He drilled it until saying the right thing became automatic, then taught it to millions. Here's the part that outlives sales. This isn't about closing deals. It's about the fact that most "no" you hear in life, in work, in any room, is not really a no. It's an unspoken worry. The people who win are the ones who hear it. I post one buried lecture like this every day, the kind that quietly changes how you operate. The next one's already up.
44:12

Tom Hopkins failed so badly at his first sales job he almost quit for construction. Then he changed one thing and sold over 6,000 homes, more than almost anyone alive. He filmed the whole method, and it's free. He wasn't a natural. He was broke, awkward, and losing. What turned it around wasn't charm or a script. It was treating persuasion as a craft with rules, the same way a trade has steps. His core idea is quieter than the usual sales hype. People don't say no to the thing. They say no to a feeling, a doubt they can't name. The job isn't to push harder. It's to find the real objection hiding under the polite one, and answer that. That sounds simple until you watch how precise he is. Every objection has a shape. Every shape has a response. He drilled it until saying the right thing became automatic, then taught it to millions. Here's the part that outlives sales. This isn't about closing deals. It's about the fact that most "no" you hear in life, in work, in any room, is not really a no. It's an unspoken worry. The people who win are the ones who hear it. I post one buried lecture like this every day, the kind that quietly changes how you operate. The next one's already up.

Niko

211,072 次观看 • 5 天前

Origins of Whole Lotta Love, Jimmy Page came up with the guitar riff for "Whole Lotta Love" in the summer of 1968, on his houseboat on the River Thames at Pangbourne, Berkshire, England. However, John Paul Jones stated that it probably was developed from a live improvisation during performances of Dazed and Confused. Page denied that the song originated onstage and that he had the riff and the rest took it from there. The chugging riff sounds like twin guitars because Page is playing two guitar strings in unison, while bending one of them to slightly change the pitch. At the same time, John Paul Jones is using the same technique on bass guitar, doubling the guitar part in a lower octave. Page recorded his part while playing through a solid-state amplifier. During the two day mix of the Led Zeppelin II album, audio engineer Eddie Kramer discovered what he thought was some magnetic tape bleedthrough on Plant's vocals on the "Whole Lotta Love" track, which could not be removed, so he put some echo on it, and Page liked the sound. Page also employed a backwards echo production technique. Years later, engineer J. J. Blair analyzed the multi-track tape and found that the second guitar track contained traces of an earlier vocal track by Plant caused by microphonic induction of the guitar pickup. This thin-sounding vocal preceded the main vocal track in a manner similar to bleedthrough. It was released as a single in 1969 in several countries; as with other Led Zeppelin songs, no single was released in the United Kingdom. In the United States, it became their first hit and was certified gold. Parts of the song's lyrics were adapted from Willie Dixon's "You Need Love", recorded by Muddy Waters in 1962; originally uncredited to Dixon, a lawsuit in 1985 was settled with a payment to Dixon and credit on subsequent releases. Led Zeppelin performing 'Whole Lotta Love' live at The Royal Albert Hall, in 1970.
6:17

Origins of Whole Lotta Love, Jimmy Page came up with the guitar riff for "Whole Lotta Love" in the summer of 1968, on his houseboat on the River Thames at Pangbourne, Berkshire, England. However, John Paul Jones stated that it probably was developed from a live improvisation during performances of Dazed and Confused. Page denied that the song originated onstage and that he had the riff and the rest took it from there. The chugging riff sounds like twin guitars because Page is playing two guitar strings in unison, while bending one of them to slightly change the pitch. At the same time, John Paul Jones is using the same technique on bass guitar, doubling the guitar part in a lower octave. Page recorded his part while playing through a solid-state amplifier. During the two day mix of the Led Zeppelin II album, audio engineer Eddie Kramer discovered what he thought was some magnetic tape bleedthrough on Plant's vocals on the "Whole Lotta Love" track, which could not be removed, so he put some echo on it, and Page liked the sound. Page also employed a backwards echo production technique. Years later, engineer J. J. Blair analyzed the multi-track tape and found that the second guitar track contained traces of an earlier vocal track by Plant caused by microphonic induction of the guitar pickup. This thin-sounding vocal preceded the main vocal track in a manner similar to bleedthrough. It was released as a single in 1969 in several countries; as with other Led Zeppelin songs, no single was released in the United Kingdom. In the United States, it became their first hit and was certified gold. Parts of the song's lyrics were adapted from Willie Dixon's "You Need Love", recorded by Muddy Waters in 1962; originally uncredited to Dixon, a lawsuit in 1985 was settled with a payment to Dixon and credit on subsequent releases. Led Zeppelin performing 'Whole Lotta Love' live at The Royal Albert Hall, in 1970.

Rock'n Roll of All

73,864 次观看 • 10 个月前

Origins of Whole Lotta Love, Jimmy Page came up with the guitar riff for "Whole Lotta Love" in the summer of 1968, on his houseboat on the River Thames at Pangbourne, Berkshire, England. However, John Paul Jones stated that it probably was developed from a live improvisation during performances of Dazed and Confused. Page denied that the song originated onstage and that he had the riff and the rest took it from there. The chugging riff sounds like twin guitars because Page is playing two guitar strings in unison, while bending one of them to slightly change the pitch. At the same time, John Paul Jones is using the same technique on bass guitar, doubling the guitar part in a lower octave. Page recorded his part while playing through a solid-state amplifier. During the two day mix of the Led Zeppelin II album, audio engineer Eddie Kramer discovered what he thought was some magnetic tape bleedthrough on Plant's vocals on the "Whole Lotta Love" track, which could not be removed, so he put some echo on it, and Page liked the sound. Page also employed a backwards echo production technique. Years later, engineer J. J. Blair analyzed the multi-track tape and found that the second guitar track contained traces of an earlier vocal track by Plant caused by microphonic induction of the guitar pickup. This thin-sounding vocal preceded the main vocal track in a manner similar to bleedthrough. It was released as a single in 1969 in several countries; as with other Led Zeppelin songs, no single was released in the United Kingdom. In the United States, it became their first hit and was certified gold. Parts of the song's lyrics were adapted from Willie Dixon's "You Need Love", recorded by Muddy Waters in 1962; originally uncredited to Dixon, a lawsuit in 1985 was settled with a payment to Dixon and credit on subsequent releases. Led Zeppelin performing 'Whole Lotta Love' live at The Royal Albert Hall, in 1970.
6:12

Origins of Whole Lotta Love, Jimmy Page came up with the guitar riff for "Whole Lotta Love" in the summer of 1968, on his houseboat on the River Thames at Pangbourne, Berkshire, England. However, John Paul Jones stated that it probably was developed from a live improvisation during performances of Dazed and Confused. Page denied that the song originated onstage and that he had the riff and the rest took it from there. The chugging riff sounds like twin guitars because Page is playing two guitar strings in unison, while bending one of them to slightly change the pitch. At the same time, John Paul Jones is using the same technique on bass guitar, doubling the guitar part in a lower octave. Page recorded his part while playing through a solid-state amplifier. During the two day mix of the Led Zeppelin II album, audio engineer Eddie Kramer discovered what he thought was some magnetic tape bleedthrough on Plant's vocals on the "Whole Lotta Love" track, which could not be removed, so he put some echo on it, and Page liked the sound. Page also employed a backwards echo production technique. Years later, engineer J. J. Blair analyzed the multi-track tape and found that the second guitar track contained traces of an earlier vocal track by Plant caused by microphonic induction of the guitar pickup. This thin-sounding vocal preceded the main vocal track in a manner similar to bleedthrough. It was released as a single in 1969 in several countries; as with other Led Zeppelin songs, no single was released in the United Kingdom. In the United States, it became their first hit and was certified gold. Parts of the song's lyrics were adapted from Willie Dixon's "You Need Love", recorded by Muddy Waters in 1962; originally uncredited to Dixon, a lawsuit in 1985 was settled with a payment to Dixon and credit on subsequent releases. Led Zeppelin performing 'Whole Lotta Love' live at The Royal Albert Hall, in 1970.

Rock'n Roll of All

97,907 次观看 • 9 个月前

Zac Efron pauses for a second, grabs the pole, and then casually recreates a photo that looks physically impossible. Did you catch that? The impressive part isn't just getting horizontal. Watch how controlled his first movement is he finds the position almost immediately instead of scrambling to hold himself up. And he does the whole thing in a suit. The contrast between how formal he looks and what he's actually doing on that pole makes the moment even better. What makes this clip work for me is the confidence. He doesn't need a second attempt to prove the photo was real—he just gets into position and holds it.
2:22

Zac Efron pauses for a second, grabs the pole, and then casually recreates a photo that looks physically impossible. Did you catch that? The impressive part isn't just getting horizontal. Watch how controlled his first movement is he finds the position almost immediately instead of scrambling to hold himself up. And he does the whole thing in a suit. The contrast between how formal he looks and what he's actually doing on that pole makes the moment even better. What makes this clip work for me is the confidence. He doesn't need a second attempt to prove the photo was real—he just gets into position and holds it.

ADEX🕴️

452,607 次观看 • 13 天前

One of the men who invented the transistor stood at a Bell Labs blackboard and explained how it works. AT&T kept the film. Almost nobody watches it. Walter Brattain shared the 1956 Nobel Prize in physics for the transistor. Every chip training every model in 2026 descends from what he built with Bardeen and Shockley in 1947. This is 28 minutes of the inventor teaching semiconductor physics himself. Properties, simple model, history, impact, new phenomena, written on the board in his own hand. Watch the section where he draws the crystal lattice and shows what an electron and a hole actually do inside it. The abstraction most engineers carry around, drawn from scratch by the man who found it. An embedded engineer I know watched it twice and said 28 minutes of chalk beat a semester of textbook diagrams. Free on YouTube from the AT&T archives, 10 chapters, black and white. Everyone uses his invention. Almost nobody hears him explain it.
28:33

One of the men who invented the transistor stood at a Bell Labs blackboard and explained how it works. AT&T kept the film. Almost nobody watches it. Walter Brattain shared the 1956 Nobel Prize in physics for the transistor. Every chip training every model in 2026 descends from what he built with Bardeen and Shockley in 1947. This is 28 minutes of the inventor teaching semiconductor physics himself. Properties, simple model, history, impact, new phenomena, written on the board in his own hand. Watch the section where he draws the crystal lattice and shows what an electron and a hole actually do inside it. The abstraction most engineers carry around, drawn from scratch by the man who found it. An embedded engineer I know watched it twice and said 28 minutes of chalk beat a semester of textbook diagrams. Free on YouTube from the AT&T archives, 10 chapters, black and white. Everyone uses his invention. Almost nobody hears him explain it.

xanax

104,696 次观看 • 27 天前

CLAUDE TOOK A FULL PC GAME, REBUILT IT FROM THE GROUND UP, AND GOT IT RUNNING NATIVELY ON ANDROID IN 6 HOURS a guy pointed claude at slay the spire 2, a game he owns on steam, and it ported the whole thing to his phone almost completely on its own here's what claude did: > it pulled apart the game and recompiled it to native arm, no emulator, wine, or proton used > wrote the code, ran the build loop, and debugged it directly on the device itself > added full touch controls that feel like a real mobile game, not awkward on screen buttons > and he even built a tool on top to sync save files between his desktop and phone a couple prompts and 6 hours. it handled the extraction, the cross compile, the building and the on device debugging by itself. fully playable, not a single crash yet
0:39

CLAUDE TOOK A FULL PC GAME, REBUILT IT FROM THE GROUND UP, AND GOT IT RUNNING NATIVELY ON ANDROID IN 6 HOURS a guy pointed claude at slay the spire 2, a game he owns on steam, and it ported the whole thing to his phone almost completely on its own here's what claude did: > it pulled apart the game and recompiled it to native arm, no emulator, wine, or proton used > wrote the code, ran the build loop, and debugged it directly on the device itself > added full touch controls that feel like a real mobile game, not awkward on screen buttons > and he even built a tool on top to sync save files between his desktop and phone a couple prompts and 6 hours. it handled the extraction, the cross compile, the building and the on device debugging by itself. fully playable, not a single crash yet

Om Patel

28,504 次观看 • 1 个月前

A BBC interviewer asked a Nobel physicist the simplest question in the world: why do two magnets push each other apart. He refused to answer it. What he did instead is the best seven minutes on thinking ever filmed. The man is Richard Feynman, at home in 1983, no blackboard, no notes, sitting in an armchair. He does not dodge because he cannot answer. He dodges because he wants you to see what the question is actually asking. So he takes an ordinary sentence, that a woman slipped on the ice and broke her hip, and starts asking why, and every answer opens another why, until the ground gives way. Then he turns it around on the interviewer with a question about ice that sounds trivial and is not. The point he arrives at is the uncomfortable one. Every explanation is only a translation into something you already accept without explanation. Magnets have no such translation. There is nothing more familiar than magnetism to reduce magnetism to, which is why every answer you were given at school was a picture, not a reason. It matters more now than it did in 1983. Any tool will hand you a fluent answer in a second. Knowing which questions actually have a bottom is the part that is still yours. One question. Seven minutes. It is in the video.
7:30

A BBC interviewer asked a Nobel physicist the simplest question in the world: why do two magnets push each other apart. He refused to answer it. What he did instead is the best seven minutes on thinking ever filmed. The man is Richard Feynman, at home in 1983, no blackboard, no notes, sitting in an armchair. He does not dodge because he cannot answer. He dodges because he wants you to see what the question is actually asking. So he takes an ordinary sentence, that a woman slipped on the ice and broke her hip, and starts asking why, and every answer opens another why, until the ground gives way. Then he turns it around on the interviewer with a question about ice that sounds trivial and is not. The point he arrives at is the uncomfortable one. Every explanation is only a translation into something you already accept without explanation. Magnets have no such translation. There is nothing more familiar than magnetism to reduce magnetism to, which is why every answer you were given at school was a picture, not a reason. It matters more now than it did in 1983. Any tool will hand you a fluent answer in a second. Knowing which questions actually have a bottom is the part that is still yours. One question. Seven minutes. It is in the video.

Stefan.

2,713,584 次观看 • 22 天前

CEO of a trillion-dollar company sat in a Stanford classroom in 2011 and explained exactly how he built it. No PR team, no prepared remarks, no investors in the room. No business school has ever added the recording to a syllabus. His name is Jensen Huang. He co-founded NVIDIA in 1993 with $40,000. By 2011 the company was worth $9 billion. Today it is worth over $3 trillion. He walked into the Stanford ASES Summit and gave away the entire playbook to a room of fifty students for free. The lecture is about when to bet everything on one technology before the market knows it exists. He did it with GPUs. Then with CUDA. Then with AI infrastructure. Three bets, same logic, same company, three different industries. The uncomfortable part is what he says about risk. He almost went bankrupt twice. What he did both times is the opposite of what every MBA program teaches. Business schools charge $200K in tuition to teach frameworks he rejected before his company was worth a billion. Every founder podcast repeats the same five lessons. Almost none of them mention what Huang actually did when the company was ninety days from dying. That part is in the lecture. It has been free for fifteen years. Filmed by a student with a handheld camera. Audio cuts in and out. He gave away the playbook of the most valuable company on Earth to fifty people. Almost nobody watched it. One classroom. One camera. The full lecture is free. It is in the video.
59:13

CEO of a trillion-dollar company sat in a Stanford classroom in 2011 and explained exactly how he built it. No PR team, no prepared remarks, no investors in the room. No business school has ever added the recording to a syllabus. His name is Jensen Huang. He co-founded NVIDIA in 1993 with $40,000. By 2011 the company was worth $9 billion. Today it is worth over $3 trillion. He walked into the Stanford ASES Summit and gave away the entire playbook to a room of fifty students for free. The lecture is about when to bet everything on one technology before the market knows it exists. He did it with GPUs. Then with CUDA. Then with AI infrastructure. Three bets, same logic, same company, three different industries. The uncomfortable part is what he says about risk. He almost went bankrupt twice. What he did both times is the opposite of what every MBA program teaches. Business schools charge $200K in tuition to teach frameworks he rejected before his company was worth a billion. Every founder podcast repeats the same five lessons. Almost none of them mention what Huang actually did when the company was ninety days from dying. That part is in the lecture. It has been free for fifteen years. Filmed by a student with a handheld camera. Audio cuts in and out. He gave away the playbook of the most valuable company on Earth to fifty people. Almost nobody watched it. One classroom. One camera. The full lecture is free. It is in the video.

Tigerflow

73,674 次观看 • 15 天前

A man who went to prison for talking people out of their money filmed himself doing it live, then sold the method as a course. 7 million people have watched him work. The man is Jordan Belfort. The film about him made him famous. What almost nobody has done is watch the real one, on camera, running the actual technique on a real prospect for 22 minutes with no script and no edit. And the way he does it is the reason to watch. He barely talks about the product. The first minutes are almost entirely questions, and every answer gets used against the person later in his own words. He is not persuading. He is collecting. Then the phrase the comments turned into a meme. He ends his key sentences with four words that make agreement feel like the neutral option and refusal feel like rudeness. Once you notice it, you cannot unhear it, and you will catch it in the next call you take. One viewer broke the whole method into 9 steps in a comment. It got 12 thousand likes, which tells you people are studying this video like a manual. Here is the uncomfortable part. Every technique in it is ordinary sales advice: listen, mirror, remove friction, set expectations. That is exactly what makes it worth studying. The tools were never the crime. The intent was. Learn what is being done to you and it stops working on you. That is the only defense there is. 22 minutes. No script. It is in the video.
21:56

A man who went to prison for talking people out of their money filmed himself doing it live, then sold the method as a course. 7 million people have watched him work. The man is Jordan Belfort. The film about him made him famous. What almost nobody has done is watch the real one, on camera, running the actual technique on a real prospect for 22 minutes with no script and no edit. And the way he does it is the reason to watch. He barely talks about the product. The first minutes are almost entirely questions, and every answer gets used against the person later in his own words. He is not persuading. He is collecting. Then the phrase the comments turned into a meme. He ends his key sentences with four words that make agreement feel like the neutral option and refusal feel like rudeness. Once you notice it, you cannot unhear it, and you will catch it in the next call you take. One viewer broke the whole method into 9 steps in a comment. It got 12 thousand likes, which tells you people are studying this video like a manual. Here is the uncomfortable part. Every technique in it is ordinary sales advice: listen, mirror, remove friction, set expectations. That is exactly what makes it worth studying. The tools were never the crime. The intent was. Learn what is being done to you and it stops working on you. That is the only defense there is. 22 minutes. No script. It is in the video.

Silverhand

1,500,229 次观看 • 20 天前

They’ll still be showing this video 150 years from now. Not as politics. Not as opinion. They’ll be studying it in classrooms as a psychological disorder called leftism. A clinical case study in what happens when human beings lose the ability to think and suffer total, catastrophic detachment from reality. During a once-in-a-century pandemic, the Biden administration took thousands upon thousands of migrants, packed them shoulder-to-shoulder on concrete floors like cargo, then unleashed them into the country. Ted Cruz... tough guy, good senator... goes down there with a camera. Sees it with his own eyes. Human beings stacked like cordwood on the floor of what looks like a morgue. And he asks the most obvious question in the world... What the hell is going on here? Very reasonable. Probably the most reasonable question anyone's asked in the history of the border, frankly. And what happens? What does the Biden handler do? Does she answer? Does she explain? Does she say, "Senator, here's our plan, here's what we're working on"? No. She gets angry. At HIM. Think of it. She gets angry at the man asking the question... not at the people who created the catastrophe. She didn't get angry at the concrete floors. Didn't get angry at the tinfoil blankets. Didn't get angry at the hundreds of migrants crammed together during a deadly pandemic. She got angry at Ted Cruz. For filming it. For showing the American people what their government was doing. And then... she starts demanding that HE show dignity to the migrants. HE should give them dignity. The man with the camera. Not herself. Not the administration that put them on a concrete floor wrapped in foil like they're being prepped for a body bag. Not the people who built this nightmare. No. The guy who showed up to expose it... HE'S the problem. HE needs to provide the dignity. And you can see it in her eyes. She believed it. She actually believed she was the good guy. Standing in the middle of a disaster she helped create, lecturing the only person in the room trying to fix it. That's the left. That's the tragedy of leftism. A total and complete sickness.
1:13

They’ll still be showing this video 150 years from now. Not as politics. Not as opinion. They’ll be studying it in classrooms as a psychological disorder called leftism. A clinical case study in what happens when human beings lose the ability to think and suffer total, catastrophic detachment from reality. During a once-in-a-century pandemic, the Biden administration took thousands upon thousands of migrants, packed them shoulder-to-shoulder on concrete floors like cargo, then unleashed them into the country. Ted Cruz... tough guy, good senator... goes down there with a camera. Sees it with his own eyes. Human beings stacked like cordwood on the floor of what looks like a morgue. And he asks the most obvious question in the world... What the hell is going on here? Very reasonable. Probably the most reasonable question anyone's asked in the history of the border, frankly. And what happens? What does the Biden handler do? Does she answer? Does she explain? Does she say, "Senator, here's our plan, here's what we're working on"? No. She gets angry. At HIM. Think of it. She gets angry at the man asking the question... not at the people who created the catastrophe. She didn't get angry at the concrete floors. Didn't get angry at the tinfoil blankets. Didn't get angry at the hundreds of migrants crammed together during a deadly pandemic. She got angry at Ted Cruz. For filming it. For showing the American people what their government was doing. And then... she starts demanding that HE show dignity to the migrants. HE should give them dignity. The man with the camera. Not herself. Not the administration that put them on a concrete floor wrapped in foil like they're being prepped for a body bag. Not the people who built this nightmare. No. The guy who showed up to expose it... HE'S the problem. HE needs to provide the dignity. And you can see it in her eyes. She believed it. She actually believed she was the good guy. Standing in the middle of a disaster she helped create, lecturing the only person in the room trying to fix it. That's the left. That's the tragedy of leftism. A total and complete sickness.

Apple Lamps

226,752 次观看 • 5 个月前

A PHYSICS PROFESSOR GAVE THE SAME LECTURE 1,742 TIMES TO WARN ABOUT ONE IDEA QUIETLY BREAKING THE HUMAN RACE. IT IS THE WORD EVERY AI LAB THROWS AROUND TODAY AND ALMOST NONE OF THEM ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND IT. 72 minutes from Albert Bartlett, a University of Colorado physicist, on the one piece of math he called humanity's greatest blind spot. -> The idea that lands: a small steady percentage is never small. 7% a year sounds calm, but it doubles in a decade, doubles again in the next, and quietly runs away from you. He shows it with bacteria in a bottle, with money, with whole cities -- the same curve that looks flat for ages and then explodes almost overnight. Everyone calls that curve "Exponential". He proves most people hear it as "Fast" when it actually means something far more violent. Right now every lab and every headline calls AI exponential. This is the talk that shows you what the word truly does -- so you see both the hype and the real danger the way the math demands. You thought it was a boring math word. It was the whole story the entire time. Save this one. You'll never hear "Exponential" the same way ↓
1:12:51

A PHYSICS PROFESSOR GAVE THE SAME LECTURE 1,742 TIMES TO WARN ABOUT ONE IDEA QUIETLY BREAKING THE HUMAN RACE. IT IS THE WORD EVERY AI LAB THROWS AROUND TODAY AND ALMOST NONE OF THEM ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND IT. 72 minutes from Albert Bartlett, a University of Colorado physicist, on the one piece of math he called humanity's greatest blind spot. -> The idea that lands: a small steady percentage is never small. 7% a year sounds calm, but it doubles in a decade, doubles again in the next, and quietly runs away from you. He shows it with bacteria in a bottle, with money, with whole cities -- the same curve that looks flat for ages and then explodes almost overnight. Everyone calls that curve "Exponential". He proves most people hear it as "Fast" when it actually means something far more violent. Right now every lab and every headline calls AI exponential. This is the talk that shows you what the word truly does -- so you see both the hype and the real danger the way the math demands. You thought it was a boring math word. It was the whole story the entire time. Save this one. You'll never hear "Exponential" the same way ↓

slash1s

100,138 次观看 • 1 个月前

Elon Musk described the government in four sentences and never made a political argument. He read out the schematic. Musk: "Government is a corporation in the limit. It is the most corporate thing. It is maximum corporation. And it's also a monopoly, and also is the only one that's allowed legally to do violence." Take the flag off it and look at what's underneath. It collects revenue. It employs millions. It owns land. It writes the rules it operates under. That's a corporation. Line for line. With three edits. You cannot choose a competitor. You cannot decline the transaction. It is the only one on earth permitted to use force to make you pay. Every other relationship in your life required your consent. This one required your birth. Musk: "Why would you want to give a corporation with no competition that can't even really go bankrupt more money?" There is no condition under which it stops. None was ever built in. Everything that has ever gotten better got better by being allowed to die. Evolution runs on extinction. Science runs on falsification. Markets run on bankruptcy. Your own body runs on cells that kill themselves on schedule. Failure isn't cruelty. It's information. It's the only mechanism in the universe that tells a system it was wrong. Take it away and the system doesn't become permanent. It becomes blind. A company that misreads the world loses customers. A government that misreads the world receives a larger budget the following year. It's the only structure we've built where failure is what feeds it. Musk: "I think the role of government should be that of like a referee, and not a player on the field." A referee was never supposed to be weak. He was supposed to be outside the outcome. The moment he starts scoring he isn't corrupt. Corruption would mean he broke a rule. He wrote the rules. He's just playing, and he's the only one allowed to keep score. A system like that never gets caught. It only gets old. Every civilization that collapsed did it with its institutions still standing. The buildings stayed. The titles stayed. The revenue arrived on schedule. What died was the feedback. The signal telling it that reality had moved and it hadn't. Rome didn't fall in a day. It stopped listening for a century and called it stability. That's the actual danger. Not tyranny. Deafness with a budget. And it runs deeper than politics. Everything you love is precious because it can be lost. A promise means something because the person making it will die. Your time matters because you don't get more of it. Mortality isn't the tragedy of being human. It's the only reason anything costs anything. Then we built one institution exempt from all of it. No death. No scarcity. No consequence. A thing that can never lose anything, deciding what everything is worth. It bills in dollars. It's paid in hours. And it has never once felt what an hour costs. It can be wrong for a century and feel nothing. You get eighty years and have to be right the first time. It doesn't have to win the argument. It only has to outlive the person making it, and it has never lost that one. It borrows against people who don't exist yet, and they will pay, because it will still be standing when they arrive. Then we handed it the only gun. This isn't a conspiracy. Conspiracies need competence and coordination. This is a design flaw, and design flaws only need time. That's the good news. A conspiracy can't be proven or fixed. A design flaw can be both. Everything good in your life exists because something was permitted to fail on the way to it. Every medicine. Every machine. Every idea that survived contact with reality. The one institution that cannot fail is the one holding the gun. That isn't a warning. It's an engineering problem. And every permanent thing on earth was designed by people who weren't.
1:00

Elon Musk described the government in four sentences and never made a political argument. He read out the schematic. Musk: "Government is a corporation in the limit. It is the most corporate thing. It is maximum corporation. And it's also a monopoly, and also is the only one that's allowed legally to do violence." Take the flag off it and look at what's underneath. It collects revenue. It employs millions. It owns land. It writes the rules it operates under. That's a corporation. Line for line. With three edits. You cannot choose a competitor. You cannot decline the transaction. It is the only one on earth permitted to use force to make you pay. Every other relationship in your life required your consent. This one required your birth. Musk: "Why would you want to give a corporation with no competition that can't even really go bankrupt more money?" There is no condition under which it stops. None was ever built in. Everything that has ever gotten better got better by being allowed to die. Evolution runs on extinction. Science runs on falsification. Markets run on bankruptcy. Your own body runs on cells that kill themselves on schedule. Failure isn't cruelty. It's information. It's the only mechanism in the universe that tells a system it was wrong. Take it away and the system doesn't become permanent. It becomes blind. A company that misreads the world loses customers. A government that misreads the world receives a larger budget the following year. It's the only structure we've built where failure is what feeds it. Musk: "I think the role of government should be that of like a referee, and not a player on the field." A referee was never supposed to be weak. He was supposed to be outside the outcome. The moment he starts scoring he isn't corrupt. Corruption would mean he broke a rule. He wrote the rules. He's just playing, and he's the only one allowed to keep score. A system like that never gets caught. It only gets old. Every civilization that collapsed did it with its institutions still standing. The buildings stayed. The titles stayed. The revenue arrived on schedule. What died was the feedback. The signal telling it that reality had moved and it hadn't. Rome didn't fall in a day. It stopped listening for a century and called it stability. That's the actual danger. Not tyranny. Deafness with a budget. And it runs deeper than politics. Everything you love is precious because it can be lost. A promise means something because the person making it will die. Your time matters because you don't get more of it. Mortality isn't the tragedy of being human. It's the only reason anything costs anything. Then we built one institution exempt from all of it. No death. No scarcity. No consequence. A thing that can never lose anything, deciding what everything is worth. It bills in dollars. It's paid in hours. And it has never once felt what an hour costs. It can be wrong for a century and feel nothing. You get eighty years and have to be right the first time. It doesn't have to win the argument. It only has to outlive the person making it, and it has never lost that one. It borrows against people who don't exist yet, and they will pay, because it will still be standing when they arrive. Then we handed it the only gun. This isn't a conspiracy. Conspiracies need competence and coordination. This is a design flaw, and design flaws only need time. That's the good news. A conspiracy can't be proven or fixed. A design flaw can be both. Everything good in your life exists because something was permitted to fail on the way to it. Every medicine. Every machine. Every idea that survived contact with reality. The one institution that cannot fail is the one holding the gun. That isn't a warning. It's an engineering problem. And every permanent thing on earth was designed by people who weren't.

Dustin

202,368 次观看 • 24 天前

THIS GUY MESSAGED A MILLION MILLIONAIRES ASKING EACH FOR $1. 26,789 ACTUALLY SENT IT he didn't type a million messages. he wrote one script with Claude opus 4.8 and let it hit every millionaire it could find on LinkedIn the pitch was insane in its simplicity: "can you send me $1?" the results are funnier than they have any right to be: -> 730,000 never even opened it -> 200,000 left him on read -> 2,356 flat out rejected him -> 42,988 asked why he even needs a dollar -> and 26,789 just… sent it. some sent more here's the part most people miss: nobody misses a dollar. that's the whole trick the ask was so small that saying yes was easier than thinking about it - and at a million messages, even a tiny yes-rate turns into real money he didn't find rich people to scam. he found the one number small enough that thousands of them wouldn't even blink and the only reason it was possible: he didn't send a million messages. an AI did, while he slept save this. the dumbest-sounding idea on the internet just out-earned most people's month - because one guy automated it instead of laughing at it
0:50

THIS GUY MESSAGED A MILLION MILLIONAIRES ASKING EACH FOR $1. 26,789 ACTUALLY SENT IT he didn't type a million messages. he wrote one script with Claude opus 4.8 and let it hit every millionaire it could find on LinkedIn the pitch was insane in its simplicity: "can you send me $1?" the results are funnier than they have any right to be: -> 730,000 never even opened it -> 200,000 left him on read -> 2,356 flat out rejected him -> 42,988 asked why he even needs a dollar -> and 26,789 just… sent it. some sent more here's the part most people miss: nobody misses a dollar. that's the whole trick the ask was so small that saying yes was easier than thinking about it - and at a million messages, even a tiny yes-rate turns into real money he didn't find rich people to scam. he found the one number small enough that thousands of them wouldn't even blink and the only reason it was possible: he didn't send a million messages. an AI did, while he slept save this. the dumbest-sounding idea on the internet just out-earned most people's month - because one guy automated it instead of laughing at it

Paone

44,643 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 TYLER ROBINSON PRELIMINARY HEARING, DAY 1 The first officer on the roof, the one who located the alleged sniper's perch, just testified under oath. 🎤⚖️ Here's what he actually found up there. 🚫 NO spent casings. He testified he'd "been around guns and snipers all the time," went looking over the edge, checked the gravel, found nothing. 🚫 NO unshot bullets either. Then the defense asked: were you aware of a bullet found on ANOTHER roof? 🏢 A separate bullet found somewhere else on scene, not on the Losee building? His answer: no. So where did that come from. 🤔 Who's tracking it. Nobody on the stand today, so far. Now the identification. 👀 He watched the roof video at the police department. The defense walked him through it point by point: Could you identify the face? ❌ No. Markings on the clothing? ❌ No. Their height? ❌ No. A hat, anything on their head? ❌ No. The ONLY thing this officer could tell you about the person on that roof is that he "wasn't heavyset." Not fat. That's the identifying feature. That's it. 🤯 And the weapon? 🔫 He testified he saw a "long black object" in the left hand as the person crossed the roof. He could NOT say it was a gun. In his own written report, he never wrote "gun." Just an object. Wrapped in what he thinks was a towel or a blanket, he wasn't sure which. Then the closer. 🎯 Defense: when you left campus at 9pm that night, did you or anyone know who the shooter was? Officer: not that I know of. Next morning, worked all day. Same question. Anyone on that campus identify the shooter? Officer: not that I know of. No casings. No bullets where they should be. A phantom bullet on another roof. No face, no height, no markings. A "long object," not a confirmed gun. And 27 minutes of bodycam that cut out because the battery "went dead" at that exact moment. 📹🔋 Charged. Not convicted. ⚖️ You can come here for Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing reporting and the same goes for if we hit trial. 📌 God bless America! 🇺🇸 Lobbying Kills. 💀
5:46

🚨 TYLER ROBINSON PRELIMINARY HEARING, DAY 1 The first officer on the roof, the one who located the alleged sniper's perch, just testified under oath. 🎤⚖️ Here's what he actually found up there. 🚫 NO spent casings. He testified he'd "been around guns and snipers all the time," went looking over the edge, checked the gravel, found nothing. 🚫 NO unshot bullets either. Then the defense asked: were you aware of a bullet found on ANOTHER roof? 🏢 A separate bullet found somewhere else on scene, not on the Losee building? His answer: no. So where did that come from. 🤔 Who's tracking it. Nobody on the stand today, so far. Now the identification. 👀 He watched the roof video at the police department. The defense walked him through it point by point: Could you identify the face? ❌ No. Markings on the clothing? ❌ No. Their height? ❌ No. A hat, anything on their head? ❌ No. The ONLY thing this officer could tell you about the person on that roof is that he "wasn't heavyset." Not fat. That's the identifying feature. That's it. 🤯 And the weapon? 🔫 He testified he saw a "long black object" in the left hand as the person crossed the roof. He could NOT say it was a gun. In his own written report, he never wrote "gun." Just an object. Wrapped in what he thinks was a towel or a blanket, he wasn't sure which. Then the closer. 🎯 Defense: when you left campus at 9pm that night, did you or anyone know who the shooter was? Officer: not that I know of. Next morning, worked all day. Same question. Anyone on that campus identify the shooter? Officer: not that I know of. No casings. No bullets where they should be. A phantom bullet on another roof. No face, no height, no markings. A "long object," not a confirmed gun. And 27 minutes of bodycam that cut out because the battery "went dead" at that exact moment. 📹🔋 Charged. Not convicted. ⚖️ You can come here for Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing reporting and the same goes for if we hit trial. 📌 God bless America! 🇺🇸 Lobbying Kills. 💀

Danks

139,652 次观看 • 1 个月前