正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

A landmark, long-suppressed study from a prestigious pro-vaccine institution is set to be unveiled at a U.S. Senate hearing next Tuesday. The research, which compares health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated individuals, reportedly reveals that the vaccinated population is significantly more prone to chronic illness. Senator Ron Johnson...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

356,525 subscribers

46,117 次观看 • 11 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

A recent hearing chaired by Senator Ron Johnson brought significant attention to an unpublished study conducted by the Henry Ford Health System, led by Dr. Marcus Zervos, the head of infectious diseases. The study, which compared health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated children, has become a central point of controversy. Following the hearing, Henry Ford Health System pushed back, stating the study draft faced significant peer review concerns and serious data flaws, and that the institution was unaware the rejected draft was being discussed. Critics, including a Washington Post journalist, have echoed these concerns, labeling the research as commissioned by an "anti-vaccine group" and highlighting methodological issues. However, defenders of the study offer counterarguments to the criticism: - They assert the study was not "commissioned" but was a challenge to Dr. Zervos to prove the safety of the vaccine schedule. - They claim no formal peer review was ever conducted on the completed study. - They argue that while the unvaccinated cohort was smaller, its size was statistically significant for comparison. - They contend that sensitivity analyses—which limited data to one year, three years, and five years—consistently showed worse health outcomes in the vaccinated group, with the results becoming more pronounced over time. The core finding of the study indicates vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to develop a chronic disease. Defenders of the research argue that the study's design mirrors the CDC's own recommended blueprint for such comparative safety studies and question why a major health institution would bury concerning results rather than address the alleged flaws and publish. This incident is framed as part of a larger pattern where a comprehensive vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study is avoided by public health authorities. A forthcoming documentary, An Inconvenient Study, promises to explore the entire episode in detail.
14:19

A recent hearing chaired by Senator Ron Johnson brought significant attention to an unpublished study conducted by the Henry Ford Health System, led by Dr. Marcus Zervos, the head of infectious diseases. The study, which compared health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated children, has become a central point of controversy. Following the hearing, Henry Ford Health System pushed back, stating the study draft faced significant peer review concerns and serious data flaws, and that the institution was unaware the rejected draft was being discussed. Critics, including a Washington Post journalist, have echoed these concerns, labeling the research as commissioned by an "anti-vaccine group" and highlighting methodological issues. However, defenders of the study offer counterarguments to the criticism: - They assert the study was not "commissioned" but was a challenge to Dr. Zervos to prove the safety of the vaccine schedule. - They claim no formal peer review was ever conducted on the completed study. - They argue that while the unvaccinated cohort was smaller, its size was statistically significant for comparison. - They contend that sensitivity analyses—which limited data to one year, three years, and five years—consistently showed worse health outcomes in the vaccinated group, with the results becoming more pronounced over time. The core finding of the study indicates vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to develop a chronic disease. Defenders of the research argue that the study's design mirrors the CDC's own recommended blueprint for such comparative safety studies and question why a major health institution would bury concerning results rather than address the alleged flaws and publish. This incident is framed as part of a larger pattern where a comprehensive vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study is avoided by public health authorities. A forthcoming documentary, An Inconvenient Study, promises to explore the entire episode in detail.

Camus

33,372 次观看 • 10 个月前

BREAKING: Senator Ron Johnson reveals a high-quality Vax vs. Unvax study will FINALLY be made public Tuesday. Originally conducted in 2000, the results have been buried for 25 years—until now. And what did the data suggest? “…the vaccinated population [is] far more prone to chronic illness than people completely unexposed to vaccines.” Attorney Aaron Siri will unveil the full findings on Tuesday. This could be HUGE.
0:48

BREAKING: Senator Ron Johnson reveals a high-quality Vax vs. Unvax study will FINALLY be made public Tuesday. Originally conducted in 2000, the results have been buried for 25 years—until now. And what did the data suggest? “…the vaccinated population [is] far more prone to chronic illness than people completely unexposed to vaccines.” Attorney Aaron Siri will unveil the full findings on Tuesday. This could be HUGE.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

526,705 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨 Del Bigtree LIVE FROM D.C. 🚨 In less than 20 minutes, Senator Ron Johnson will hold a hearing on An Inconvenient Study. Since 2016, I’ve pushed for a top infectious disease expert at one of the world’s most prestigious medical centers to conduct the first true vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study. Instead of proving us wrong, the results became one of the greatest indictments of the vaccine program ever. 📺 Watch the hearing LIVE at ( This is the moment we’ve all been waiting for.
1:16

🚨 Del Bigtree LIVE FROM D.C. 🚨 In less than 20 minutes, Senator Ron Johnson will hold a hearing on An Inconvenient Study. Since 2016, I’ve pushed for a top infectious disease expert at one of the world’s most prestigious medical centers to conduct the first true vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study. Instead of proving us wrong, the results became one of the greatest indictments of the vaccine program ever. 📺 Watch the hearing LIVE at ( This is the moment we’ve all been waiting for.

The HighWire

43,880 次观看 • 11 个月前

As Senator Johnson stated at today’s hearing, I will be testifying this Tuesday at a Senate hearing on the corruption of vaccine science, including about a robust study conducted by a major institution that inconveniently found far higher rates of various chronic diseases among vaccinated children and was therefore filed away. If you are in DC, the hearing is open to the public. Hart Senate Office Building, Room SH-216, at 2 p.m. on Tuesday Sept 9. Don’t miss it!
2:58

As Senator Johnson stated at today’s hearing, I will be testifying this Tuesday at a Senate hearing on the corruption of vaccine science, including about a robust study conducted by a major institution that inconveniently found far higher rates of various chronic diseases among vaccinated children and was therefore filed away. If you are in DC, the hearing is open to the public. Hart Senate Office Building, Room SH-216, at 2 p.m. on Tuesday Sept 9. Don’t miss it!

Aaron Siri

109,394 次观看 • 11 个月前

A suppressed study, hidden from the public, reveals a devastating truth the establishment never wanted you to hear. According to children's health advocate Mary Holland, a pivotal hearing uncovered an unpublished study from the Henry Ford Center in Detroit. Conducted explicitly to PROVE vaccinated children are healthier, the results instead showed the opposite. The findings? Vaccinated children are two and a half times more likely to suffer from a chronic disease. This includes: - Autism - Asthma - ADHD - Severe Allergies This critical data was never published. It was brought to light by legal experts and presented by Senator Ron Johnson, who is now blowing the whistle on this concealment. We are at the beginning of a global reckoning. For decades, the explosive rise in chronic childhood illness has paralleled the explosive rise of the vaccine schedule. The plausible connection is now more than plausible—it is supported by their own suppressed research. The truth is finally coming out. The question is, will you listen?
1:07

A suppressed study, hidden from the public, reveals a devastating truth the establishment never wanted you to hear. According to children's health advocate Mary Holland, a pivotal hearing uncovered an unpublished study from the Henry Ford Center in Detroit. Conducted explicitly to PROVE vaccinated children are healthier, the results instead showed the opposite. The findings? Vaccinated children are two and a half times more likely to suffer from a chronic disease. This includes: - Autism - Asthma - ADHD - Severe Allergies This critical data was never published. It was brought to light by legal experts and presented by Senator Ron Johnson, who is now blowing the whistle on this concealment. We are at the beginning of a global reckoning. For decades, the explosive rise in chronic childhood illness has paralleled the explosive rise of the vaccine schedule. The plausible connection is now more than plausible—it is supported by their own suppressed research. The truth is finally coming out. The question is, will you listen?

Camus

112,057 次观看 • 10 个月前

Del Bigtree Exposes New Attempt to Silence Vaccine Safety Investigation Del Bigtree, host of The High Wire and producer of the controversial documentary VAXXED, is facing renewed censorship efforts—this time from the Henry Ford Health System (HFHS). In a powerful new segment, Bigtree reveals that HFHS has sent a cease-and-desist letter, threatening defamation lawsuits over his new film, An Inconvenient Study. The film investigates an unpublished HFHS study that compared health outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. The health system claims the study was shelved due to "significant flaws in its data and methodology," not because of its results. Bigtree counters this, presenting a compelling case that the study's findings—which allegedly show increased rates of chronic disease, neurological disorders, and asthma in vaccinated children—are the true reason it was buried. He argues that had the results been reversed, glorifying vaccines, the study would have been "rushed to print" as definitive proof of vaccine safety. Instead, it joins at least seven other similar vaxxed/unvaxxed studies that have been suppressed. Bigtree connects this to a long-standing pattern: his work on VAXXED and his early COVID-19 reporting on lab origins, mask inefficacy, and lockdown harms were all met with fierce attacks and platform censorship. Yet, each time, the controversy only amplified his message, growing his audience from hundreds of thousands to millions worldwide. Standing firm in his commitment to medical transparency, Bigtree premiered a new trailer for An Inconvenient Study, featuring never-before-seen hidden camera footage of his conversations with HFHS officials. This is more than a movie; it's a front line in the battle for medical freedom and free speech.
9:51

Del Bigtree Exposes New Attempt to Silence Vaccine Safety Investigation Del Bigtree, host of The High Wire and producer of the controversial documentary VAXXED, is facing renewed censorship efforts—this time from the Henry Ford Health System (HFHS). In a powerful new segment, Bigtree reveals that HFHS has sent a cease-and-desist letter, threatening defamation lawsuits over his new film, An Inconvenient Study. The film investigates an unpublished HFHS study that compared health outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. The health system claims the study was shelved due to "significant flaws in its data and methodology," not because of its results. Bigtree counters this, presenting a compelling case that the study's findings—which allegedly show increased rates of chronic disease, neurological disorders, and asthma in vaccinated children—are the true reason it was buried. He argues that had the results been reversed, glorifying vaccines, the study would have been "rushed to print" as definitive proof of vaccine safety. Instead, it joins at least seven other similar vaxxed/unvaxxed studies that have been suppressed. Bigtree connects this to a long-standing pattern: his work on VAXXED and his early COVID-19 reporting on lab origins, mask inefficacy, and lockdown harms were all met with fierce attacks and platform censorship. Yet, each time, the controversy only amplified his message, growing his audience from hundreds of thousands to millions worldwide. Standing firm in his commitment to medical transparency, Bigtree premiered a new trailer for An Inconvenient Study, featuring never-before-seen hidden camera footage of his conversations with HFHS officials. This is more than a movie; it's a front line in the battle for medical freedom and free speech.

Camus

11,213 次观看 • 10 个月前

The Most Important Vaccine Safety Study Ever Suppressed. Henry Ford Vaxxed vs. Unvaxxed Study: Vaccinated Kids Had 453% More Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Unvaccinated children had ZERO cases of brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities or tics. Soon To Be Released..."Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short- and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study" ICAN lead counsel Aaron Siri, Esq. revealed the results of an unpublished study from Michigan’s Henry Ford Health System. The study was done by infectious disease physician, Dr Marcus Zervos, MD. In 2016, journalist Del Bigtree issued a challenge to the head of infectious disease at one of the most prestigious medical institutions in the world: conduct the most thorough vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study that has ever been done. The expert, Dr Marcus Zervos MD, took up the challenge and ran the study to prove Del wrong. What the study revealed was so horrifying that it was locked away, hidden from the public...until now. Henry Ford birth cohort (n=18,468) tracked children from birth for 10 years. The Study Found... -4.29 times the rate of asthma -3.03 times the rate of atopic disease -5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease -5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders which included 4.47 times the rate of speech disorder and 3.28 times the rate of developmental delay. Notably, the study also found the following: -Brain Dysfunction: 8 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Diabetes: 42 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -ADHD: 262 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Behavioral Disability: 165 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Learning Disability: 65 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Intellectual Disability: 5 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Tics: 46 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Other Psychological Disability 9 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated 👇An Inconvenient Study: Premieres October 3👇 👇Figure #1 From The Unpublished Study👇 👇Vaccinated Study By Hooker & Miller👇 Credits: ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network Del Bigtree Aaron Siri Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® McCullough Foundation Senator Ron Johnson The HighWire Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
2:02

The Most Important Vaccine Safety Study Ever Suppressed. Henry Ford Vaxxed vs. Unvaxxed Study: Vaccinated Kids Had 453% More Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Unvaccinated children had ZERO cases of brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities or tics. Soon To Be Released..."Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short- and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study" ICAN lead counsel Aaron Siri, Esq. revealed the results of an unpublished study from Michigan’s Henry Ford Health System. The study was done by infectious disease physician, Dr Marcus Zervos, MD. In 2016, journalist Del Bigtree issued a challenge to the head of infectious disease at one of the most prestigious medical institutions in the world: conduct the most thorough vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study that has ever been done. The expert, Dr Marcus Zervos MD, took up the challenge and ran the study to prove Del wrong. What the study revealed was so horrifying that it was locked away, hidden from the public...until now. Henry Ford birth cohort (n=18,468) tracked children from birth for 10 years. The Study Found... -4.29 times the rate of asthma -3.03 times the rate of atopic disease -5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease -5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders which included 4.47 times the rate of speech disorder and 3.28 times the rate of developmental delay. Notably, the study also found the following: -Brain Dysfunction: 8 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Diabetes: 42 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -ADHD: 262 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Behavioral Disability: 165 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Learning Disability: 65 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Intellectual Disability: 5 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Tics: 46 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Other Psychological Disability 9 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated 👇An Inconvenient Study: Premieres October 3👇 👇Figure #1 From The Unpublished Study👇 👇Vaccinated Study By Hooker & Miller👇 Credits: ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network Del Bigtree Aaron Siri Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® McCullough Foundation Senator Ron Johnson The HighWire Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Valerie Anne Smith

87,981 次观看 • 11 个月前

The Unvaccinated Cohort Had Zero ADHD: Legal Expert Aaron Siri Explains Why That's Not a "Fatal Flaw" in Critical Vaccine Study Aaron Siri, a legal expert who frequently litigates around scientific studies, delivered a powerful commentary on the contentious Henry Ford vaccine study. He argues it is one of the best-designed vaccine safety studies ever conducted, precisely because it compares vaccinated against unvaccinated children—a critical methodological standard he claims is often avoided in favor of "vaccinated vs. vaccinated" comparisons, which he likens to "studying the danger of arsenic by comparing it to hemlock." Siri gives immense credit to the scientists behind the study for their fortitude in conducting it, suggesting it was never published because the unexpected results threatened their careers. He directly addresses critiques of the data, specifically the zero ADHD cases in the unvaccinated cohort. He contends this is not a fatal flaw, pointing to 52 cases of asthma in the same group as proof that other environmental factors can cause harm. He further argues that ADHD has a known biological plausibility of being linked to immune dysregulation, a mechanism through which vaccines could potentially be a trigger, a finding supported by smaller existing studies. On the topic of autism, Siri highlights the study's finding of 23 cases in the vaccinated group versus 1 in the unvaccinated. He explains that due to outdated DSM-IV billing codes, many autism cases were historically categorized as ADHD, likely skewing the data. Ultimately, he asserts that while the study is not perfect or wholly determinative, its results are indisputable in one key conclusion: they reveal a "pretty high probability that heavy vaccination might lead to a higher instance of chronic illness" and serve as a powerful call to action for more rigorous and honest safety investigations.
4:53

The Unvaccinated Cohort Had Zero ADHD: Legal Expert Aaron Siri Explains Why That's Not a "Fatal Flaw" in Critical Vaccine Study Aaron Siri, a legal expert who frequently litigates around scientific studies, delivered a powerful commentary on the contentious Henry Ford vaccine study. He argues it is one of the best-designed vaccine safety studies ever conducted, precisely because it compares vaccinated against unvaccinated children—a critical methodological standard he claims is often avoided in favor of "vaccinated vs. vaccinated" comparisons, which he likens to "studying the danger of arsenic by comparing it to hemlock." Siri gives immense credit to the scientists behind the study for their fortitude in conducting it, suggesting it was never published because the unexpected results threatened their careers. He directly addresses critiques of the data, specifically the zero ADHD cases in the unvaccinated cohort. He contends this is not a fatal flaw, pointing to 52 cases of asthma in the same group as proof that other environmental factors can cause harm. He further argues that ADHD has a known biological plausibility of being linked to immune dysregulation, a mechanism through which vaccines could potentially be a trigger, a finding supported by smaller existing studies. On the topic of autism, Siri highlights the study's finding of 23 cases in the vaccinated group versus 1 in the unvaccinated. He explains that due to outdated DSM-IV billing codes, many autism cases were historically categorized as ADHD, likely skewing the data. Ultimately, he asserts that while the study is not perfect or wholly determinative, its results are indisputable in one key conclusion: they reveal a "pretty high probability that heavy vaccination might lead to a higher instance of chronic illness" and serve as a powerful call to action for more rigorous and honest safety investigations.

Camus

16,299 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨 Hidden camera footage reveals information about the circumstances surrounding the unpublished vaccine study from the award-winning film “An Inconvenient Study!” 💉Dr. Marcus Zervos of Henry Ford Health admits that a study shows differences between vaccinated & unvaccinated kids, but fears he’d “need to retire” if he submitted it for publication. 😯"America is the sickest nation in the industrialized world" – close to 54% of kids have chronic illness! 🔥 This could be a GALILEO MOMENT to begin to fix the vaccine program & potentially save lives. 🌏 Why the silence? WE will not be silenced. Watch “An Inconvenient Study” by going to Download it. Share it with your friends. YOU are the distribution system.
1:39

🚨 Hidden camera footage reveals information about the circumstances surrounding the unpublished vaccine study from the award-winning film “An Inconvenient Study!” 💉Dr. Marcus Zervos of Henry Ford Health admits that a study shows differences between vaccinated & unvaccinated kids, but fears he’d “need to retire” if he submitted it for publication. 😯"America is the sickest nation in the industrialized world" – close to 54% of kids have chronic illness! 🔥 This could be a GALILEO MOMENT to begin to fix the vaccine program & potentially save lives. 🌏 Why the silence? WE will not be silenced. Watch “An Inconvenient Study” by going to Download it. Share it with your friends. YOU are the distribution system.

The HighWire

37,982 次观看 • 9 个月前

The Inconvenient Truth: Suppressed Data Shows Vaccinated Cohort Far Sicker Than Unvaccinated Del Bigtree reveals a hidden-camera investigation into a suppressed study from Henry Ford Health, with allegations so explosive the filmmakers are now facing a cease-and-desist. The study compared health outcomes in children. The results were the inverse of the public health narrative. The data allegedly showed the vaccinated cohort had a 250% increased rate of chronic disease and 6 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders. Bigtree states: "Had it been the unvaccinated with those rates... they would have rushed this to publication. It would have been the biggest headline across the world." But it wasn't. The findings were allegedly buried because they revealed the opposite of what the pharmaceutical industry wants us to believe. The investigation points to the study's lead, Dr. Marcus Zervos—a world-renowned virologist who led Moderna's trials for the institution. On camera, he reportedly affirms the study's validity, saying, "It's a good study. I would publish it as it is, but I'm worried about losing my job." Henry Ford Health claims the study wasn't published due to poor scientific rigor, not the results. This fuels Bigtree's central question: "If vaccines are making our kids healthier, we need proof of that right now. Show us the study where the vaccinated have lower rates of autism, lower rates of ADHD... then I won't have anything I can say." "Why has no government in the world ever done that study?" Bigtree asks. "They've never been able to prove that the vaccinated are healthier. They can't do that study. That should scare the hell out of everyone in the world right now with children."
3:44

The Inconvenient Truth: Suppressed Data Shows Vaccinated Cohort Far Sicker Than Unvaccinated Del Bigtree reveals a hidden-camera investigation into a suppressed study from Henry Ford Health, with allegations so explosive the filmmakers are now facing a cease-and-desist. The study compared health outcomes in children. The results were the inverse of the public health narrative. The data allegedly showed the vaccinated cohort had a 250% increased rate of chronic disease and 6 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders. Bigtree states: "Had it been the unvaccinated with those rates... they would have rushed this to publication. It would have been the biggest headline across the world." But it wasn't. The findings were allegedly buried because they revealed the opposite of what the pharmaceutical industry wants us to believe. The investigation points to the study's lead, Dr. Marcus Zervos—a world-renowned virologist who led Moderna's trials for the institution. On camera, he reportedly affirms the study's validity, saying, "It's a good study. I would publish it as it is, but I'm worried about losing my job." Henry Ford Health claims the study wasn't published due to poor scientific rigor, not the results. This fuels Bigtree's central question: "If vaccines are making our kids healthier, we need proof of that right now. Show us the study where the vaccinated have lower rates of autism, lower rates of ADHD... then I won't have anything I can say." "Why has no government in the world ever done that study?" Bigtree asks. "They've never been able to prove that the vaccinated are healthier. They can't do that study. That should scare the hell out of everyone in the world right now with children."

Camus

28,515 次观看 • 10 个月前

I make a point in the film that matters, and it keeps getting overlooked, probably because it’s inconvenient. If this study stood alone, fine. Take it with a grain of salt. That’s how science works. One study raises a question; it doesn’t settle the case. But this study does not stand alone. It’s now by my count the fifth study to compare vaccinated children to completely unvaccinated children. And every single time, the signal is the same. The vaccinated are sicker. Not once- not one time anywhere in the world- has a retrospective study compared these two groups and shown that vaccinated children are healthier. Not by a government. Not by a major health agency. Not by a prestigious institution. Not in the U.S., not in Europe, not anywhere. So let me ask the most obvious question there is: Wasn’t that the whole point of the vaccine program? Watch the rest with Mike Rowe and see the movie at
1:29

I make a point in the film that matters, and it keeps getting overlooked, probably because it’s inconvenient. If this study stood alone, fine. Take it with a grain of salt. That’s how science works. One study raises a question; it doesn’t settle the case. But this study does not stand alone. It’s now by my count the fifth study to compare vaccinated children to completely unvaccinated children. And every single time, the signal is the same. The vaccinated are sicker. Not once- not one time anywhere in the world- has a retrospective study compared these two groups and shown that vaccinated children are healthier. Not by a government. Not by a major health agency. Not by a prestigious institution. Not in the U.S., not in Europe, not anywhere. So let me ask the most obvious question there is: Wasn’t that the whole point of the vaccine program? Watch the rest with Mike Rowe and see the movie at

Del Bigtree

25,101 次观看 • 7 个月前

👀Have you seen the study? "The only real problem with this study, and why it didn't get submitted for publication, is that its findings did not fit the belief that vaccines are safe--- a real-world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted." -Aaron Siri Esq., in Senate Hearing on Corruption in Science, held by Senator Ron Johnson last week. Link to the study below.
0:51

👀Have you seen the study? "The only real problem with this study, and why it didn't get submitted for publication, is that its findings did not fit the belief that vaccines are safe--- a real-world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted." -Aaron Siri Esq., in Senate Hearing on Corruption in Science, held by Senator Ron Johnson last week. Link to the study below.

The HighWire

88,165 次观看 • 10 个月前

You’re right, Jim. I am on a mission. “An Inconvenient Study” asks a very important question: Why is it that not one major medical institution in the world (or a government or health agency) in all of this time has ever been able to do a study comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated children where the vaccinated came out healthier? I had a great time talking with Jim Breuer. Check it out.
1:17

You’re right, Jim. I am on a mission. “An Inconvenient Study” asks a very important question: Why is it that not one major medical institution in the world (or a government or health agency) in all of this time has ever been able to do a study comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated children where the vaccinated came out healthier? I had a great time talking with Jim Breuer. Check it out.

Del Bigtree

16,322 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨MAJOR: For YEARS we’ve been clamoring for a true study comparing vaxxed children to unvaxxed children to measure health outcomes. Vaccine proponents DID that study from 2016-2020 and BURIED IT. But, ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network, The HighWire and Del Bigtree in partnership with Senator Ron Johnson now HAVE the results. MUST WATCH.
4:44

🚨MAJOR: For YEARS we’ve been clamoring for a true study comparing vaxxed children to unvaxxed children to measure health outcomes. Vaccine proponents DID that study from 2016-2020 and BURIED IT. But, ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network, The HighWire and Del Bigtree in partnership with Senator Ron Johnson now HAVE the results. MUST WATCH.

Tracy Beanz

77,344 次观看 • 11 个月前

A powerful claim from pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas. After decades in medicine, the evidence is clear: the risk of death from a childhood vaccine is greater than the risk of death from the disease it targets. This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a statistical reality, supported by research the medical establishment has tried to suppress. Dr. Thomas’s own study, which compared health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children, was retracted on a questionable technicality—not because of flawed data. Why silence this? Because the results are undeniable: Unvaccinated children are consistently healthier. They show significantly lower rates of: - Autism - ADHD - Asthma - Cancer - Autoimmune disorders - Chronic infections The CDC has never conducted a large-scale study comparing long-term health outcomes. Why? Many believe it’s because they already know what the data would show. It’s time for transparency. It’s time for informed consent. It’s time to move vaccines to Schedule B.
1:55

A powerful claim from pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas. After decades in medicine, the evidence is clear: the risk of death from a childhood vaccine is greater than the risk of death from the disease it targets. This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a statistical reality, supported by research the medical establishment has tried to suppress. Dr. Thomas’s own study, which compared health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children, was retracted on a questionable technicality—not because of flawed data. Why silence this? Because the results are undeniable: Unvaccinated children are consistently healthier. They show significantly lower rates of: - Autism - ADHD - Asthma - Cancer - Autoimmune disorders - Chronic infections The CDC has never conducted a large-scale study comparing long-term health outcomes. Why? Many believe it’s because they already know what the data would show. It’s time for transparency. It’s time for informed consent. It’s time to move vaccines to Schedule B.

Camus

73,855 次观看 • 11 个月前

REPORT: A buried study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children has finally come to light—and the results are shattering the vaccine narrative. Featured in Del Bigtree’s new film An Inconvenient Study ( this long-suppressed data reveals what public health agencies have refused to examine for decades: vaccinated children suffer dramatically higher rates of chronic illness. Led by Dr. Marcus Zervos of Henry Ford Health, the study found vaccinated kids were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma, nearly six times more likely to develop autoimmune disorders, and over five times more likely to suffer neurodevelopmental issues. Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, learning disabilities, or behavioral disorders. When confronted with the findings, Dr. Zervos admitted on hidden camera, “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.” This could be the biggest medical cover-up of our time. See the data for yourself in 's explosive report. Watch the full episode:👇
17:52

REPORT: A buried study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children has finally come to light—and the results are shattering the vaccine narrative. Featured in Del Bigtree’s new film An Inconvenient Study ( this long-suppressed data reveals what public health agencies have refused to examine for decades: vaccinated children suffer dramatically higher rates of chronic illness. Led by Dr. Marcus Zervos of Henry Ford Health, the study found vaccinated kids were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma, nearly six times more likely to develop autoimmune disorders, and over five times more likely to suffer neurodevelopmental issues. Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, learning disabilities, or behavioral disorders. When confronted with the findings, Dr. Zervos admitted on hidden camera, “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.” This could be the biggest medical cover-up of our time. See the data for yourself in 's explosive report. Watch the full episode:👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

64,527 次观看 • 10 个月前

17% vs. 57%: The Staggering Chronic Illness Difference Between Unvaxxed and Vaxxed Kids A Major Study Found—Before It Was Buried. A bombshell revelation from attorney Aaron Siri exposes a systemic corruption of science that has left parents in the dark for decades. Leading up to 2013, the U.S. government paid the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to review ALL existing science to confirm the safety of the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule. Their finding? “The studies designed to examine the long-term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule… have not been conducted.” They found ZERO studies comparing the long-term health of fully vaccinated vs. completely unvaccinated children. The IOM could only conclude “there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe”—a far cry from proving it is safe. They noted such a study was possible using large medical databases. A 2015 CDC white paper even outlined how to do it. Yet, the government never did. In 2017, the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) sought to answer this critical question. They met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center—a mainstream, pro-vaccine doctor who conducts clinical trials for companies like Moderna. He agreed to conduct the study. Using actual medical records from 2000-2016, his team compared children with no vaccines to those who had one or more. The sample was large: ~2,000 unvaxxed vs. ~16,000 vaxxed. The results were staggering, and all statistically significant. Compared to the unvaccinated, vaccinated children had: ▪️ 4.29x higher rate of ASTHMA ▪️ 3.03x higher rate of ATOPIC DISEASE ▪️ 5.96x higher rate of AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE ▪️ 5.53x higher rate of NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS - Including 3.28x DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY - And 4.47x SPEECH DISORDER For conditions like ADHD, learning disabilities, and intellectual disabilities, there were HUNDREDS of cases in the vaccinated group and ZERO in the unvaccinated. The overarching finding: By age 10, only 17% of the unvaccinated children had a chronic illness. Among the vaccinated, that number skyrocketed to 57%. This was the study that was never done. The one the IOM called for. And its findings were devastating to the official narrative. So what happened? The study was completed in early 2020… and then buried. Aaron Siri states that the researchers, despite affirming the study was well-designed, refused to publish it. Dr. Zervos reportedly said he “didn’t want to lose his job.” The co-author said she “did not want to make doctors uncomfortable.” This is the corruption of science in plain sight. Studies that confirm the desired outcome are published. Those that don’t are shoved in a drawer. We must be able to have honest science to ensure we are protecting children from infectious diseases without causing widespread chronic harm. The public deserves the truth.
6:12

17% vs. 57%: The Staggering Chronic Illness Difference Between Unvaxxed and Vaxxed Kids A Major Study Found—Before It Was Buried. A bombshell revelation from attorney Aaron Siri exposes a systemic corruption of science that has left parents in the dark for decades. Leading up to 2013, the U.S. government paid the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to review ALL existing science to confirm the safety of the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule. Their finding? “The studies designed to examine the long-term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule… have not been conducted.” They found ZERO studies comparing the long-term health of fully vaccinated vs. completely unvaccinated children. The IOM could only conclude “there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe”—a far cry from proving it is safe. They noted such a study was possible using large medical databases. A 2015 CDC white paper even outlined how to do it. Yet, the government never did. In 2017, the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) sought to answer this critical question. They met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center—a mainstream, pro-vaccine doctor who conducts clinical trials for companies like Moderna. He agreed to conduct the study. Using actual medical records from 2000-2016, his team compared children with no vaccines to those who had one or more. The sample was large: ~2,000 unvaxxed vs. ~16,000 vaxxed. The results were staggering, and all statistically significant. Compared to the unvaccinated, vaccinated children had: ▪️ 4.29x higher rate of ASTHMA ▪️ 3.03x higher rate of ATOPIC DISEASE ▪️ 5.96x higher rate of AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE ▪️ 5.53x higher rate of NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS - Including 3.28x DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY - And 4.47x SPEECH DISORDER For conditions like ADHD, learning disabilities, and intellectual disabilities, there were HUNDREDS of cases in the vaccinated group and ZERO in the unvaccinated. The overarching finding: By age 10, only 17% of the unvaccinated children had a chronic illness. Among the vaccinated, that number skyrocketed to 57%. This was the study that was never done. The one the IOM called for. And its findings were devastating to the official narrative. So what happened? The study was completed in early 2020… and then buried. Aaron Siri states that the researchers, despite affirming the study was well-designed, refused to publish it. Dr. Zervos reportedly said he “didn’t want to lose his job.” The co-author said she “did not want to make doctors uncomfortable.” This is the corruption of science in plain sight. Studies that confirm the desired outcome are published. Those that don’t are shoved in a drawer. We must be able to have honest science to ensure we are protecting children from infectious diseases without causing widespread chronic harm. The public deserves the truth.

Camus

1,049,356 次观看 • 11 个月前

The Vaccine Safety Scandal: Why the NIH Refuses to Compare Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Populations Del Bigtree, a fierce advocate for medical freedom, recently shared a chilling revelation from his work with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. During Donald Trump’s first term, Kennedy was tasked with confronting the National Institutes of Health (NIH) about vaccine safety. Bigtree accompanied him, armed with critical questions. What they uncovered was staggering: the NIH admitted they do not conduct double-blind, placebo-controlled trials—the gold standard for safety testing—for childhood vaccines. Why? They claim it’s “unethical” to withhold vaccines from a placebo group. When pressed further, Bigtree and Kennedy asked for a retrospective study comparing health outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations using the NIH’s vast database of millions. The response? “We can’t figure out how to do that study.” This excuse baffled Bigtree, as comparative studies are the backbone of science. How could the NIH, with all its resources, claim such a study is impossible? A year later, at an event with pro-vaccine advocate Paul Offit, Bigtree got clarity. Offit dismissed the idea of a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study, citing “confounding factors.” The unvaccinated, Offit argued, are likely healthier not because they avoid vaccines, but because they live differently—avoiding tap water, processed foods, or even airport scanners. In other words, the NIH has likely conducted these studies, but the results don’t fit their narrative: unvaccinated individuals are consistently healthier, with lower rates of autism, cancer, and other chronic conditions. This realization exposed a disturbing truth: the medical establishment prioritizes the sick over the healthy. Instead of studying why unvaccinated populations thrive, they dismiss them as outliers and double down on vaccinating everyone—regardless of the consequences. Bigtree passionately argues this approach poisons healthy individuals, destroys gut biomes, and undermines natural immunity, all to prop up a system that profits from perpetual illness. “They’re attacking the healthy to protect the sick,” Bigtree declared. “My kids are thriving without your injections, and I’ll fight to my last breath to keep your poisons away from them.” This is a call to action: demand transparency, reject coerced medical interventions, and protect our children’s health.
3:31

The Vaccine Safety Scandal: Why the NIH Refuses to Compare Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Populations Del Bigtree, a fierce advocate for medical freedom, recently shared a chilling revelation from his work with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. During Donald Trump’s first term, Kennedy was tasked with confronting the National Institutes of Health (NIH) about vaccine safety. Bigtree accompanied him, armed with critical questions. What they uncovered was staggering: the NIH admitted they do not conduct double-blind, placebo-controlled trials—the gold standard for safety testing—for childhood vaccines. Why? They claim it’s “unethical” to withhold vaccines from a placebo group. When pressed further, Bigtree and Kennedy asked for a retrospective study comparing health outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations using the NIH’s vast database of millions. The response? “We can’t figure out how to do that study.” This excuse baffled Bigtree, as comparative studies are the backbone of science. How could the NIH, with all its resources, claim such a study is impossible? A year later, at an event with pro-vaccine advocate Paul Offit, Bigtree got clarity. Offit dismissed the idea of a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study, citing “confounding factors.” The unvaccinated, Offit argued, are likely healthier not because they avoid vaccines, but because they live differently—avoiding tap water, processed foods, or even airport scanners. In other words, the NIH has likely conducted these studies, but the results don’t fit their narrative: unvaccinated individuals are consistently healthier, with lower rates of autism, cancer, and other chronic conditions. This realization exposed a disturbing truth: the medical establishment prioritizes the sick over the healthy. Instead of studying why unvaccinated populations thrive, they dismiss them as outliers and double down on vaccinating everyone—regardless of the consequences. Bigtree passionately argues this approach poisons healthy individuals, destroys gut biomes, and undermines natural immunity, all to prop up a system that profits from perpetual illness. “They’re attacking the healthy to protect the sick,” Bigtree declared. “My kids are thriving without your injections, and I’ll fight to my last breath to keep your poisons away from them.” This is a call to action: demand transparency, reject coerced medical interventions, and protect our children’s health.

Camus

42,611 次观看 • 1 年前

The results of the study at the heart of our award-winning film “An Inconvenient Study” are shocking. A complaint I hear often is that the study is too small - that there aren’t enough children in the unvaccinated group. For contrast, the Hepatitis-B vaccine that we give newborns only had 147 children in it, with no control and no placebo. They were monitored for 5 days. So, a 5-day safety study with 147 children was good enough for the Hep-B approval, but a study with twenty thousand kids, two thousand of which were unvaccinated, followed for multiple years, is not? Think about that. Weston A. Price Foundation
1:59

The results of the study at the heart of our award-winning film “An Inconvenient Study” are shocking. A complaint I hear often is that the study is too small - that there aren’t enough children in the unvaccinated group. For contrast, the Hepatitis-B vaccine that we give newborns only had 147 children in it, with no control and no placebo. They were monitored for 5 days. So, a 5-day safety study with 147 children was good enough for the Hep-B approval, but a study with twenty thousand kids, two thousand of which were unvaccinated, followed for multiple years, is not? Think about that. Weston A. Price Foundation

Del Bigtree

115,850 次观看 • 7 个月前

My God… what have they done💔 🚨 Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study • Aaron Siri and Del Bigtree met with Dr. Zervos, a pro-vaccine researcher involved in clinical trials, to propose a study comparing health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. • The study was a large-scale analysis of children enrolled at Henry Ford Medical Center from 2000 to 2016, tracked from birth onward. • The study compared unvaccinated children to those who received one or more of the Childhood vaccines, using actual medical records for data. 🔻 Unvaccinated Children: - ZERO Brain dysfunction - ZERO diabetes - ZERO behavioral problems - ZERO learning disabilities - ZERO intellectual disabilities - ZERO tics - ZERO psychological disabilities 🔻 Vaccinated Children: • Asthma: 4.29 times higher in vaccinated children. •• Acute and chronic Ear Infections: 600% more likely with a vaccinated child ••• Atopic disease: 3.03 times higher. •••• Autoimmune disease: 5.96 times higher •••••Neurological Disorders: 300-616% increase in vaccinated children — ADHD, Autism, Behavioral Disability, Developmental Delay, Learning Disability, Intellectual Disability, Speech Disorder 🔻 The study was never published because its findings contradicted the prevailing narrative that vaccines are universally safe. Dr. Zervos and the research team refused to publish due to concerns about job security and making doctors uncomfortable, despite acknowledging the study’s findings.
4:06

My God… what have they done💔 🚨 Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study • Aaron Siri and Del Bigtree met with Dr. Zervos, a pro-vaccine researcher involved in clinical trials, to propose a study comparing health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. • The study was a large-scale analysis of children enrolled at Henry Ford Medical Center from 2000 to 2016, tracked from birth onward. • The study compared unvaccinated children to those who received one or more of the Childhood vaccines, using actual medical records for data. 🔻 Unvaccinated Children: - ZERO Brain dysfunction - ZERO diabetes - ZERO behavioral problems - ZERO learning disabilities - ZERO intellectual disabilities - ZERO tics - ZERO psychological disabilities 🔻 Vaccinated Children: • Asthma: 4.29 times higher in vaccinated children. •• Acute and chronic Ear Infections: 600% more likely with a vaccinated child ••• Atopic disease: 3.03 times higher. •••• Autoimmune disease: 5.96 times higher •••••Neurological Disorders: 300-616% increase in vaccinated children — ADHD, Autism, Behavioral Disability, Developmental Delay, Learning Disability, Intellectual Disability, Speech Disorder 🔻 The study was never published because its findings contradicted the prevailing narrative that vaccines are universally safe. Dr. Zervos and the research team refused to publish due to concerns about job security and making doctors uncomfortable, despite acknowledging the study’s findings.

MJTruthUltra

642,145 次观看 • 11 个月前