正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

A suppressed study, hidden from the public, reveals a devastating truth the establishment never wanted you to hear. According to children's health advocate Mary Holland, a pivotal hearing uncovered an unpublished study from the Henry Ford Center in Detroit. Conducted explicitly to PROVE vaccinated children are healthier, the results... instead showed the opposite. The findings? Vaccinated children are two and a half times more likely to suffer from a chronic disease. This includes: - Autism - Asthma - ADHD - Severe Allergies This critical data was never published. It was brought to light by legal experts and presented by Senator Ron Johnson, who is now blowing the whistle on this concealment. We are at the beginning of a global reckoning. For decades, the explosive rise in chronic childhood illness has paralleled the explosive rise of the vaccine schedule. The plausible connection is now more than plausible—it is supported by their own suppressed research. The truth is finally coming out. The question is, will you listen?show more

Camus

451,469 subscribers

112,001 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

REPORT: A buried study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children has finally come to light—and the results are shattering the vaccine narrative. Featured in Del Bigtree’s new film An Inconvenient Study ( this long-suppressed data reveals what public health agencies have refused to examine for decades: vaccinated children suffer dramatically higher rates of chronic illness. Led by Dr. Marcus Zervos of Henry Ford Health, the study found vaccinated kids were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma, nearly six times more likely to develop autoimmune disorders, and over five times more likely to suffer neurodevelopmental issues. Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, learning disabilities, or behavioral disorders. When confronted with the findings, Dr. Zervos admitted on hidden camera, “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.” This could be the biggest medical cover-up of our time. See the data for yourself in 's explosive report. Watch the full episode:👇

REPORT: A buried study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children has finally come to light—and the results are shattering the vaccine narrative. Featured in Del Bigtree’s new film An Inconvenient Study ( this long-suppressed data reveals what public health agencies have refused to examine for decades: vaccinated children suffer dramatically higher rates of chronic illness. Led by Dr. Marcus Zervos of Henry Ford Health, the study found vaccinated kids were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma, nearly six times more likely to develop autoimmune disorders, and over five times more likely to suffer neurodevelopmental issues. Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, learning disabilities, or behavioral disorders. When confronted with the findings, Dr. Zervos admitted on hidden camera, “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.” This could be the biggest medical cover-up of our time. See the data for yourself in 's explosive report. Watch the full episode:👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

64,514 次观看 • 8 个月前

A powerful claim from pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas. After decades in medicine, the evidence is clear: the risk of death from a childhood vaccine is greater than the risk of death from the disease it targets. This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a statistical reality, supported by research the medical establishment has tried to suppress. Dr. Thomas’s own study, which compared health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children, was retracted on a questionable technicality—not because of flawed data. Why silence this? Because the results are undeniable: Unvaccinated children are consistently healthier. They show significantly lower rates of: - Autism - ADHD - Asthma - Cancer - Autoimmune disorders - Chronic infections The CDC has never conducted a large-scale study comparing long-term health outcomes. Why? Many believe it’s because they already know what the data would show. It’s time for transparency. It’s time for informed consent. It’s time to move vaccines to Schedule B.

A powerful claim from pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas. After decades in medicine, the evidence is clear: the risk of death from a childhood vaccine is greater than the risk of death from the disease it targets. This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a statistical reality, supported by research the medical establishment has tried to suppress. Dr. Thomas’s own study, which compared health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children, was retracted on a questionable technicality—not because of flawed data. Why silence this? Because the results are undeniable: Unvaccinated children are consistently healthier. They show significantly lower rates of: - Autism - ADHD - Asthma - Cancer - Autoimmune disorders - Chronic infections The CDC has never conducted a large-scale study comparing long-term health outcomes. Why? Many believe it’s because they already know what the data would show. It’s time for transparency. It’s time for informed consent. It’s time to move vaccines to Schedule B.

Camus

73,855 次观看 • 10 个月前

A recent hearing chaired by Senator Ron Johnson brought significant attention to an unpublished study conducted by the Henry Ford Health System, led by Dr. Marcus Zervos, the head of infectious diseases. The study, which compared health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated children, has become a central point of controversy. Following the hearing, Henry Ford Health System pushed back, stating the study draft faced significant peer review concerns and serious data flaws, and that the institution was unaware the rejected draft was being discussed. Critics, including a Washington Post journalist, have echoed these concerns, labeling the research as commissioned by an "anti-vaccine group" and highlighting methodological issues. However, defenders of the study offer counterarguments to the criticism: - They assert the study was not "commissioned" but was a challenge to Dr. Zervos to prove the safety of the vaccine schedule. - They claim no formal peer review was ever conducted on the completed study. - They argue that while the unvaccinated cohort was smaller, its size was statistically significant for comparison. - They contend that sensitivity analyses—which limited data to one year, three years, and five years—consistently showed worse health outcomes in the vaccinated group, with the results becoming more pronounced over time. The core finding of the study indicates vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to develop a chronic disease. Defenders of the research argue that the study's design mirrors the CDC's own recommended blueprint for such comparative safety studies and question why a major health institution would bury concerning results rather than address the alleged flaws and publish. This incident is framed as part of a larger pattern where a comprehensive vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study is avoided by public health authorities. A forthcoming documentary, An Inconvenient Study, promises to explore the entire episode in detail.

A recent hearing chaired by Senator Ron Johnson brought significant attention to an unpublished study conducted by the Henry Ford Health System, led by Dr. Marcus Zervos, the head of infectious diseases. The study, which compared health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated children, has become a central point of controversy. Following the hearing, Henry Ford Health System pushed back, stating the study draft faced significant peer review concerns and serious data flaws, and that the institution was unaware the rejected draft was being discussed. Critics, including a Washington Post journalist, have echoed these concerns, labeling the research as commissioned by an "anti-vaccine group" and highlighting methodological issues. However, defenders of the study offer counterarguments to the criticism: - They assert the study was not "commissioned" but was a challenge to Dr. Zervos to prove the safety of the vaccine schedule. - They claim no formal peer review was ever conducted on the completed study. - They argue that while the unvaccinated cohort was smaller, its size was statistically significant for comparison. - They contend that sensitivity analyses—which limited data to one year, three years, and five years—consistently showed worse health outcomes in the vaccinated group, with the results becoming more pronounced over time. The core finding of the study indicates vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to develop a chronic disease. Defenders of the research argue that the study's design mirrors the CDC's own recommended blueprint for such comparative safety studies and question why a major health institution would bury concerning results rather than address the alleged flaws and publish. This incident is framed as part of a larger pattern where a comprehensive vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study is avoided by public health authorities. A forthcoming documentary, An Inconvenient Study, promises to explore the entire episode in detail.

Camus

33,372 次观看 • 9 个月前

You've seen what happened when I handed the science to someone who disagreed with me. This is what that study actually found. Vaccinated children were two and a half times more likely to have at least one chronic disease. Across every major health category in the study, the unvaccinated children were healthier. Those are his numbers from his study. I am gladly traveling the world to talk about it and the world is now watching "An Inconvenient Study"

You've seen what happened when I handed the science to someone who disagreed with me. This is what that study actually found. Vaccinated children were two and a half times more likely to have at least one chronic disease. Across every major health category in the study, the unvaccinated children were healthier. Those are his numbers from his study. I am gladly traveling the world to talk about it and the world is now watching "An Inconvenient Study"

Del Bigtree

37,556 次观看 • 11 天前

The Inconvenient Truth: Suppressed Data Shows Vaccinated Cohort Far Sicker Than Unvaccinated Del Bigtree reveals a hidden-camera investigation into a suppressed study from Henry Ford Health, with allegations so explosive the filmmakers are now facing a cease-and-desist. The study compared health outcomes in children. The results were the inverse of the public health narrative. The data allegedly showed the vaccinated cohort had a 250% increased rate of chronic disease and 6 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders. Bigtree states: "Had it been the unvaccinated with those rates... they would have rushed this to publication. It would have been the biggest headline across the world." But it wasn't. The findings were allegedly buried because they revealed the opposite of what the pharmaceutical industry wants us to believe. The investigation points to the study's lead, Dr. Marcus Zervos—a world-renowned virologist who led Moderna's trials for the institution. On camera, he reportedly affirms the study's validity, saying, "It's a good study. I would publish it as it is, but I'm worried about losing my job." Henry Ford Health claims the study wasn't published due to poor scientific rigor, not the results. This fuels Bigtree's central question: "If vaccines are making our kids healthier, we need proof of that right now. Show us the study where the vaccinated have lower rates of autism, lower rates of ADHD... then I won't have anything I can say." "Why has no government in the world ever done that study?" Bigtree asks. "They've never been able to prove that the vaccinated are healthier. They can't do that study. That should scare the hell out of everyone in the world right now with children."

The Inconvenient Truth: Suppressed Data Shows Vaccinated Cohort Far Sicker Than Unvaccinated Del Bigtree reveals a hidden-camera investigation into a suppressed study from Henry Ford Health, with allegations so explosive the filmmakers are now facing a cease-and-desist. The study compared health outcomes in children. The results were the inverse of the public health narrative. The data allegedly showed the vaccinated cohort had a 250% increased rate of chronic disease and 6 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders. Bigtree states: "Had it been the unvaccinated with those rates... they would have rushed this to publication. It would have been the biggest headline across the world." But it wasn't. The findings were allegedly buried because they revealed the opposite of what the pharmaceutical industry wants us to believe. The investigation points to the study's lead, Dr. Marcus Zervos—a world-renowned virologist who led Moderna's trials for the institution. On camera, he reportedly affirms the study's validity, saying, "It's a good study. I would publish it as it is, but I'm worried about losing my job." Henry Ford Health claims the study wasn't published due to poor scientific rigor, not the results. This fuels Bigtree's central question: "If vaccines are making our kids healthier, we need proof of that right now. Show us the study where the vaccinated have lower rates of autism, lower rates of ADHD... then I won't have anything I can say." "Why has no government in the world ever done that study?" Bigtree asks. "They've never been able to prove that the vaccinated are healthier. They can't do that study. That should scare the hell out of everyone in the world right now with children."

Camus

28,429 次观看 • 8 个月前

A landmark, long-suppressed study from a prestigious pro-vaccine institution is set to be unveiled at a U.S. Senate hearing next Tuesday. The research, which compares health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated individuals, reportedly reveals that the vaccinated population is significantly more prone to chronic illness. Senator Ron Johnson will hold the hearing, where attorney Aaron Siri will testify and formally enter the study into the congressional record. According to Del Bigtree of The HighWire, the study was conducted by a high-integrity healthcare facility that initially undertook the research to disprove claims of vaccine-related harm. However, upon discovering damning results in 2020 that allegedly implicated vaccines in the chronic disease epidemic, the institution chose to bury the findings. The revelation of this study is being hailed as a potential game-changer for the medical freedom movement. To coincide with the hearing, the trailer for a new documentary detailing the study's suppression, titled "An Inconvenient Study," will premiere. The full film is scheduled for release on October 3rd. This development represents the first time a major, ostensibly impartial medical institution has conducted such a comparative analysis, with results that could fundamentally challenge the established narrative on vaccine safety.

A landmark, long-suppressed study from a prestigious pro-vaccine institution is set to be unveiled at a U.S. Senate hearing next Tuesday. The research, which compares health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated individuals, reportedly reveals that the vaccinated population is significantly more prone to chronic illness. Senator Ron Johnson will hold the hearing, where attorney Aaron Siri will testify and formally enter the study into the congressional record. According to Del Bigtree of The HighWire, the study was conducted by a high-integrity healthcare facility that initially undertook the research to disprove claims of vaccine-related harm. However, upon discovering damning results in 2020 that allegedly implicated vaccines in the chronic disease epidemic, the institution chose to bury the findings. The revelation of this study is being hailed as a potential game-changer for the medical freedom movement. To coincide with the hearing, the trailer for a new documentary detailing the study's suppression, titled "An Inconvenient Study," will premiere. The full film is scheduled for release on October 3rd. This development represents the first time a major, ostensibly impartial medical institution has conducted such a comparative analysis, with results that could fundamentally challenge the established narrative on vaccine safety.

Camus

46,117 次观看 • 9 个月前

A MUST WATCH! Aaron Siri just revealed that a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study from Henry Ford Medical Center was buried because it showed unvaccinated children were healthier. “Del Bigtree and I met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center.” “He was pro-vaccine, running clinical trials.” “We argued this was the chance to shut the anti-vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier.” “To our surprise, he agreed to conduct the study.” “Dr. Zervos recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. These were mainstream scientists with orthodox views about vaccines.” “The study compared children enrolled at Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward — unvaccinated children versus those who received one or more vaccines.” “It was based on actual medical records.” “Vaccinated children had 4.29x the rate of asthma, 3.03x the rate of atopic disease, 5.96x the rate of autoimmune disease, 5.53x the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, including 3.28x developmental delay and 4.47x speech disorder.” “ADHD: 262 cases in the vaccinated group. Zero in the unvaccinated group.” “All of these findings were statistically significant.” “After 10 years, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health issue — often multiple, only 17% of unvaccinated children did.” “Had it found vaccinated kids were healthier, it would have been published immediately. Because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a drawer.” “The findings didn’t fit the policy that vaccines are safe.” “We urged the researchers to submit it. They admitted the study was well-designed and conducted. But Dr. Zervos said he didn’t want to lose his job. Another said she didn’t want to make doctors uncomfortable.” “This is a real-world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted — how only studies that confirm the belief that vaccines are safe get published. Everything else gets shoved in a drawer.”

A MUST WATCH! Aaron Siri just revealed that a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study from Henry Ford Medical Center was buried because it showed unvaccinated children were healthier. “Del Bigtree and I met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center.” “He was pro-vaccine, running clinical trials.” “We argued this was the chance to shut the anti-vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier.” “To our surprise, he agreed to conduct the study.” “Dr. Zervos recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. These were mainstream scientists with orthodox views about vaccines.” “The study compared children enrolled at Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward — unvaccinated children versus those who received one or more vaccines.” “It was based on actual medical records.” “Vaccinated children had 4.29x the rate of asthma, 3.03x the rate of atopic disease, 5.96x the rate of autoimmune disease, 5.53x the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, including 3.28x developmental delay and 4.47x speech disorder.” “ADHD: 262 cases in the vaccinated group. Zero in the unvaccinated group.” “All of these findings were statistically significant.” “After 10 years, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health issue — often multiple, only 17% of unvaccinated children did.” “Had it found vaccinated kids were healthier, it would have been published immediately. Because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a drawer.” “The findings didn’t fit the policy that vaccines are safe.” “We urged the researchers to submit it. They admitted the study was well-designed and conducted. But Dr. Zervos said he didn’t want to lose his job. Another said she didn’t want to make doctors uncomfortable.” “This is a real-world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted — how only studies that confirm the belief that vaccines are safe get published. Everything else gets shoved in a drawer.”

End Tribalism in Politics

1,534,114 次观看 • 9 个月前

The Most Important Vaccine Safety Study Ever Suppressed. Henry Ford Vaxxed vs. Unvaxxed Study: Vaccinated Kids Had 453% More Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Unvaccinated children had ZERO cases of brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities or tics. Soon To Be Released..."Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short- and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study" ICAN lead counsel Aaron Siri, Esq. revealed the results of an unpublished study from Michigan’s Henry Ford Health System. The study was done by infectious disease physician, Dr Marcus Zervos, MD. In 2016, journalist Del Bigtree issued a challenge to the head of infectious disease at one of the most prestigious medical institutions in the world: conduct the most thorough vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study that has ever been done. The expert, Dr Marcus Zervos MD, took up the challenge and ran the study to prove Del wrong. What the study revealed was so horrifying that it was locked away, hidden from the public...until now. Henry Ford birth cohort (n=18,468) tracked children from birth for 10 years. The Study Found... -4.29 times the rate of asthma -3.03 times the rate of atopic disease -5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease -5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders which included 4.47 times the rate of speech disorder and 3.28 times the rate of developmental delay. Notably, the study also found the following: -Brain Dysfunction: 8 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Diabetes: 42 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -ADHD: 262 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Behavioral Disability: 165 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Learning Disability: 65 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Intellectual Disability: 5 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Tics: 46 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Other Psychological Disability 9 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated 👇An Inconvenient Study: Premieres October 3👇 👇Figure #1 From The Unpublished Study👇 👇Vaccinated Study By Hooker & Miller👇 Credits: ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network Del Bigtree Aaron Siri Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® McCullough Foundation Senator Ron Johnson The HighWire Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The Most Important Vaccine Safety Study Ever Suppressed. Henry Ford Vaxxed vs. Unvaxxed Study: Vaccinated Kids Had 453% More Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Unvaccinated children had ZERO cases of brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities or tics. Soon To Be Released..."Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short- and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study" ICAN lead counsel Aaron Siri, Esq. revealed the results of an unpublished study from Michigan’s Henry Ford Health System. The study was done by infectious disease physician, Dr Marcus Zervos, MD. In 2016, journalist Del Bigtree issued a challenge to the head of infectious disease at one of the most prestigious medical institutions in the world: conduct the most thorough vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study that has ever been done. The expert, Dr Marcus Zervos MD, took up the challenge and ran the study to prove Del wrong. What the study revealed was so horrifying that it was locked away, hidden from the public...until now. Henry Ford birth cohort (n=18,468) tracked children from birth for 10 years. The Study Found... -4.29 times the rate of asthma -3.03 times the rate of atopic disease -5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease -5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders which included 4.47 times the rate of speech disorder and 3.28 times the rate of developmental delay. Notably, the study also found the following: -Brain Dysfunction: 8 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Diabetes: 42 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -ADHD: 262 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Behavioral Disability: 165 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Learning Disability: 65 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Intellectual Disability: 5 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Tics: 46 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Other Psychological Disability 9 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated 👇An Inconvenient Study: Premieres October 3👇 👇Figure #1 From The Unpublished Study👇 👇Vaccinated Study By Hooker & Miller👇 Credits: ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network Del Bigtree Aaron Siri Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® McCullough Foundation Senator Ron Johnson The HighWire Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Valerie Anne Smith

87,927 次观看 • 9 个月前

My God… what have they done💔 🚨 Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study • Aaron Siri and Del Bigtree met with Dr. Zervos, a pro-vaccine researcher involved in clinical trials, to propose a study comparing health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. • The study was a large-scale analysis of children enrolled at Henry Ford Medical Center from 2000 to 2016, tracked from birth onward. • The study compared unvaccinated children to those who received one or more of the Childhood vaccines, using actual medical records for data. 🔻 Unvaccinated Children: - ZERO Brain dysfunction - ZERO diabetes - ZERO behavioral problems - ZERO learning disabilities - ZERO intellectual disabilities - ZERO tics - ZERO psychological disabilities 🔻 Vaccinated Children: • Asthma: 4.29 times higher in vaccinated children. •• Acute and chronic Ear Infections: 600% more likely with a vaccinated child ••• Atopic disease: 3.03 times higher. •••• Autoimmune disease: 5.96 times higher •••••Neurological Disorders: 300-616% increase in vaccinated children — ADHD, Autism, Behavioral Disability, Developmental Delay, Learning Disability, Intellectual Disability, Speech Disorder 🔻 The study was never published because its findings contradicted the prevailing narrative that vaccines are universally safe. Dr. Zervos and the research team refused to publish due to concerns about job security and making doctors uncomfortable, despite acknowledging the study’s findings.

My God… what have they done💔 🚨 Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study • Aaron Siri and Del Bigtree met with Dr. Zervos, a pro-vaccine researcher involved in clinical trials, to propose a study comparing health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. • The study was a large-scale analysis of children enrolled at Henry Ford Medical Center from 2000 to 2016, tracked from birth onward. • The study compared unvaccinated children to those who received one or more of the Childhood vaccines, using actual medical records for data. 🔻 Unvaccinated Children: - ZERO Brain dysfunction - ZERO diabetes - ZERO behavioral problems - ZERO learning disabilities - ZERO intellectual disabilities - ZERO tics - ZERO psychological disabilities 🔻 Vaccinated Children: • Asthma: 4.29 times higher in vaccinated children. •• Acute and chronic Ear Infections: 600% more likely with a vaccinated child ••• Atopic disease: 3.03 times higher. •••• Autoimmune disease: 5.96 times higher •••••Neurological Disorders: 300-616% increase in vaccinated children — ADHD, Autism, Behavioral Disability, Developmental Delay, Learning Disability, Intellectual Disability, Speech Disorder 🔻 The study was never published because its findings contradicted the prevailing narrative that vaccines are universally safe. Dr. Zervos and the research team refused to publish due to concerns about job security and making doctors uncomfortable, despite acknowledging the study’s findings.

MJTruthUltra

641,778 次观看 • 9 个月前

BREAKING: Senator Ron Johnson reveals a high-quality Vax vs. Unvax study will FINALLY be made public Tuesday. Originally conducted in 2000, the results have been buried for 25 years—until now. And what did the data suggest? “…the vaccinated population [is] far more prone to chronic illness than people completely unexposed to vaccines.” Attorney Aaron Siri will unveil the full findings on Tuesday. This could be HUGE.

BREAKING: Senator Ron Johnson reveals a high-quality Vax vs. Unvax study will FINALLY be made public Tuesday. Originally conducted in 2000, the results have been buried for 25 years—until now. And what did the data suggest? “…the vaccinated population [is] far more prone to chronic illness than people completely unexposed to vaccines.” Attorney Aaron Siri will unveil the full findings on Tuesday. This could be HUGE.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

526,530 次观看 • 9 个月前

On 5 September 2025, US lawyer Aaron Siri submitted testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, focusing on alleged deficiencies in the safety evaluation of the CDC’s childhood vaccination schedule. A central finding in Siri’s testimony was an unpublished retrospective study from Henry Ford Health (conducted 2017–2020), comparing health outcomes in 18,468 children born between 2000 and 2016 (1,957 unvaccinated vs. 16,511 vaccinated). You can read the study here: The results included a finding that vaccinated children had statistically significant higher rates of chronic conditions including: ◦ 3.03 times the rate of atopic diseases like eczema. ◦ 4.29 times the rate of asthma. ◦ 5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders ◦ 5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease Overall, the study found that vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to develop a chronic health condition. Surely this is something that the Therapeutic Goods Administration would be interested in? Last week during Senate estimates, I tabled the Henry Ford Study to the Community Affairs Committee and I asked the TGA if they were aware of it. Watch the response here:

On 5 September 2025, US lawyer Aaron Siri submitted testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, focusing on alleged deficiencies in the safety evaluation of the CDC’s childhood vaccination schedule. A central finding in Siri’s testimony was an unpublished retrospective study from Henry Ford Health (conducted 2017–2020), comparing health outcomes in 18,468 children born between 2000 and 2016 (1,957 unvaccinated vs. 16,511 vaccinated). You can read the study here: The results included a finding that vaccinated children had statistically significant higher rates of chronic conditions including: ◦ 3.03 times the rate of atopic diseases like eczema. ◦ 4.29 times the rate of asthma. ◦ 5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders ◦ 5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease Overall, the study found that vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to develop a chronic health condition. Surely this is something that the Therapeutic Goods Administration would be interested in? Last week during Senate estimates, I tabled the Henry Ford Study to the Community Affairs Committee and I asked the TGA if they were aware of it. Watch the response here:

Senator Alex Antic

44,203 次观看 • 8 个月前

The Unvaccinated Cohort Had Zero ADHD: Legal Expert Aaron Siri Explains Why That's Not a "Fatal Flaw" in Critical Vaccine Study Aaron Siri, a legal expert who frequently litigates around scientific studies, delivered a powerful commentary on the contentious Henry Ford vaccine study. He argues it is one of the best-designed vaccine safety studies ever conducted, precisely because it compares vaccinated against unvaccinated children—a critical methodological standard he claims is often avoided in favor of "vaccinated vs. vaccinated" comparisons, which he likens to "studying the danger of arsenic by comparing it to hemlock." Siri gives immense credit to the scientists behind the study for their fortitude in conducting it, suggesting it was never published because the unexpected results threatened their careers. He directly addresses critiques of the data, specifically the zero ADHD cases in the unvaccinated cohort. He contends this is not a fatal flaw, pointing to 52 cases of asthma in the same group as proof that other environmental factors can cause harm. He further argues that ADHD has a known biological plausibility of being linked to immune dysregulation, a mechanism through which vaccines could potentially be a trigger, a finding supported by smaller existing studies. On the topic of autism, Siri highlights the study's finding of 23 cases in the vaccinated group versus 1 in the unvaccinated. He explains that due to outdated DSM-IV billing codes, many autism cases were historically categorized as ADHD, likely skewing the data. Ultimately, he asserts that while the study is not perfect or wholly determinative, its results are indisputable in one key conclusion: they reveal a "pretty high probability that heavy vaccination might lead to a higher instance of chronic illness" and serve as a powerful call to action for more rigorous and honest safety investigations.

The Unvaccinated Cohort Had Zero ADHD: Legal Expert Aaron Siri Explains Why That's Not a "Fatal Flaw" in Critical Vaccine Study Aaron Siri, a legal expert who frequently litigates around scientific studies, delivered a powerful commentary on the contentious Henry Ford vaccine study. He argues it is one of the best-designed vaccine safety studies ever conducted, precisely because it compares vaccinated against unvaccinated children—a critical methodological standard he claims is often avoided in favor of "vaccinated vs. vaccinated" comparisons, which he likens to "studying the danger of arsenic by comparing it to hemlock." Siri gives immense credit to the scientists behind the study for their fortitude in conducting it, suggesting it was never published because the unexpected results threatened their careers. He directly addresses critiques of the data, specifically the zero ADHD cases in the unvaccinated cohort. He contends this is not a fatal flaw, pointing to 52 cases of asthma in the same group as proof that other environmental factors can cause harm. He further argues that ADHD has a known biological plausibility of being linked to immune dysregulation, a mechanism through which vaccines could potentially be a trigger, a finding supported by smaller existing studies. On the topic of autism, Siri highlights the study's finding of 23 cases in the vaccinated group versus 1 in the unvaccinated. He explains that due to outdated DSM-IV billing codes, many autism cases were historically categorized as ADHD, likely skewing the data. Ultimately, he asserts that while the study is not perfect or wholly determinative, its results are indisputable in one key conclusion: they reveal a "pretty high probability that heavy vaccination might lead to a higher instance of chronic illness" and serve as a powerful call to action for more rigorous and honest safety investigations.

Camus

16,299 次观看 • 9 个月前

17% vs. 57%: The Staggering Chronic Illness Difference Between Unvaxxed and Vaxxed Kids A Major Study Found—Before It Was Buried. A bombshell revelation from attorney Aaron Siri exposes a systemic corruption of science that has left parents in the dark for decades. Leading up to 2013, the U.S. government paid the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to review ALL existing science to confirm the safety of the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule. Their finding? “The studies designed to examine the long-term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule… have not been conducted.” They found ZERO studies comparing the long-term health of fully vaccinated vs. completely unvaccinated children. The IOM could only conclude “there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe”—a far cry from proving it is safe. They noted such a study was possible using large medical databases. A 2015 CDC white paper even outlined how to do it. Yet, the government never did. In 2017, the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) sought to answer this critical question. They met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center—a mainstream, pro-vaccine doctor who conducts clinical trials for companies like Moderna. He agreed to conduct the study. Using actual medical records from 2000-2016, his team compared children with no vaccines to those who had one or more. The sample was large: ~2,000 unvaxxed vs. ~16,000 vaxxed. The results were staggering, and all statistically significant. Compared to the unvaccinated, vaccinated children had: ▪️ 4.29x higher rate of ASTHMA ▪️ 3.03x higher rate of ATOPIC DISEASE ▪️ 5.96x higher rate of AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE ▪️ 5.53x higher rate of NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS - Including 3.28x DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY - And 4.47x SPEECH DISORDER For conditions like ADHD, learning disabilities, and intellectual disabilities, there were HUNDREDS of cases in the vaccinated group and ZERO in the unvaccinated. The overarching finding: By age 10, only 17% of the unvaccinated children had a chronic illness. Among the vaccinated, that number skyrocketed to 57%. This was the study that was never done. The one the IOM called for. And its findings were devastating to the official narrative. So what happened? The study was completed in early 2020… and then buried. Aaron Siri states that the researchers, despite affirming the study was well-designed, refused to publish it. Dr. Zervos reportedly said he “didn’t want to lose his job.” The co-author said she “did not want to make doctors uncomfortable.” This is the corruption of science in plain sight. Studies that confirm the desired outcome are published. Those that don’t are shoved in a drawer. We must be able to have honest science to ensure we are protecting children from infectious diseases without causing widespread chronic harm. The public deserves the truth.

17% vs. 57%: The Staggering Chronic Illness Difference Between Unvaxxed and Vaxxed Kids A Major Study Found—Before It Was Buried. A bombshell revelation from attorney Aaron Siri exposes a systemic corruption of science that has left parents in the dark for decades. Leading up to 2013, the U.S. government paid the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to review ALL existing science to confirm the safety of the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule. Their finding? “The studies designed to examine the long-term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule… have not been conducted.” They found ZERO studies comparing the long-term health of fully vaccinated vs. completely unvaccinated children. The IOM could only conclude “there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe”—a far cry from proving it is safe. They noted such a study was possible using large medical databases. A 2015 CDC white paper even outlined how to do it. Yet, the government never did. In 2017, the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) sought to answer this critical question. They met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center—a mainstream, pro-vaccine doctor who conducts clinical trials for companies like Moderna. He agreed to conduct the study. Using actual medical records from 2000-2016, his team compared children with no vaccines to those who had one or more. The sample was large: ~2,000 unvaxxed vs. ~16,000 vaxxed. The results were staggering, and all statistically significant. Compared to the unvaccinated, vaccinated children had: ▪️ 4.29x higher rate of ASTHMA ▪️ 3.03x higher rate of ATOPIC DISEASE ▪️ 5.96x higher rate of AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE ▪️ 5.53x higher rate of NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS - Including 3.28x DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY - And 4.47x SPEECH DISORDER For conditions like ADHD, learning disabilities, and intellectual disabilities, there were HUNDREDS of cases in the vaccinated group and ZERO in the unvaccinated. The overarching finding: By age 10, only 17% of the unvaccinated children had a chronic illness. Among the vaccinated, that number skyrocketed to 57%. This was the study that was never done. The one the IOM called for. And its findings were devastating to the official narrative. So what happened? The study was completed in early 2020… and then buried. Aaron Siri states that the researchers, despite affirming the study was well-designed, refused to publish it. Dr. Zervos reportedly said he “didn’t want to lose his job.” The co-author said she “did not want to make doctors uncomfortable.” This is the corruption of science in plain sight. Studies that confirm the desired outcome are published. Those that don’t are shoved in a drawer. We must be able to have honest science to ensure we are protecting children from infectious diseases without causing widespread chronic harm. The public deserves the truth.

Camus

1,048,232 次观看 • 9 个月前

The Data Speaks For Itself...Over The Course Of 10 Years, The More Vaccines You Had, The More Chronic Conditions You Developed. Infections, ADD/ADHD, Asthma, Allergies, Even Plain Old Anemia. It Doesn't Matter What We Looked At...Every Condition Skyrocketed In The Vaccinated. We now know, because of vaccinated vs unvaccinated studies, unvaccinated children are always healthier & experience little to no chronic conditions experienced by those who are vaccinated. Health Condition-- Vaccinated / Unvaccinated: *⃣ All Chronic Conditions -- 60% / 5.71% *⃣ Arthritis -- 16.67% / 0% *⃣ Heart Disease -- 48% / 0% *⃣ Diabetes -- 10% / 0% *⃣ Asthma -- 7.7% / 0% *⃣ Autism -- 3.2% / 0% *⃣ ADHD -- 9.4% / 0.47% *⃣ Cancer -- 6.0% / 0% Vaccinated children have: ✳️14X the rate of gastrointestinal disorders. ✳️21X the rate of ADD/ADHD. ✳️28X the rate of ear infections. Speakers: PaulThomas & Del Bigtree Video: The HighWire 👇Chronic Aluminum Retention From Vaccines👇 👇214 Research Papers: Vaccines Cause Autism👇 👇Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated Study👇

The Data Speaks For Itself...Over The Course Of 10 Years, The More Vaccines You Had, The More Chronic Conditions You Developed. Infections, ADD/ADHD, Asthma, Allergies, Even Plain Old Anemia. It Doesn't Matter What We Looked At...Every Condition Skyrocketed In The Vaccinated. We now know, because of vaccinated vs unvaccinated studies, unvaccinated children are always healthier & experience little to no chronic conditions experienced by those who are vaccinated. Health Condition-- Vaccinated / Unvaccinated: ⃣ All Chronic Conditions -- 60% / 5.71% ⃣ Arthritis -- 16.67% / 0% ⃣ Heart Disease -- 48% / 0% ⃣ Diabetes -- 10% / 0% ⃣ Asthma -- 7.7% / 0% ⃣ Autism -- 3.2% / 0% ⃣ ADHD -- 9.4% / 0.47% ⃣ Cancer -- 6.0% / 0% Vaccinated children have: ✳️14X the rate of gastrointestinal disorders. ✳️21X the rate of ADD/ADHD. ✳️28X the rate of ear infections. Speakers: PaulThomas & Del Bigtree Video: The HighWire 👇Chronic Aluminum Retention From Vaccines👇 👇214 Research Papers: Vaccines Cause Autism👇 👇Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated Study👇

Valerie Anne Smith

93,514 次观看 • 1 年前

He made a bet with a scientist to prove him wrong and show that vaccinated kids were healthier. The study was finished in 2020 but never published. When Del Bigtree finally saw it on hidden camera, the results were shocking — vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to have chronic disease. The scientist admitted it was a good and important study but said publishing it would end his career. GOING ROGUE WITH LARA LOGAN EP. 43 INJECTING TRUTH INTO THE VACCINE DEBATE With Del Bigtree Watch Full Episode Below. ⬇️ #GoingRogue #LaraLogan #DelBigtree #Vaccines #Truth #HealthFreedom #MedicalFreedom #BigPharma #FaithFamilyFreedom

He made a bet with a scientist to prove him wrong and show that vaccinated kids were healthier. The study was finished in 2020 but never published. When Del Bigtree finally saw it on hidden camera, the results were shocking — vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to have chronic disease. The scientist admitted it was a good and important study but said publishing it would end his career. GOING ROGUE WITH LARA LOGAN EP. 43 INJECTING TRUTH INTO THE VACCINE DEBATE With Del Bigtree Watch Full Episode Below. ⬇️ #GoingRogue #LaraLogan #DelBigtree #Vaccines #Truth #HealthFreedom #MedicalFreedom #BigPharma #FaithFamilyFreedom

Lara Logan

457,274 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨 Hidden camera footage reveals information about the circumstances surrounding the unpublished vaccine study from the award-winning film “An Inconvenient Study!” 💉Dr. Marcus Zervos of Henry Ford Health admits that a study shows differences between vaccinated & unvaccinated kids, but fears he’d “need to retire” if he submitted it for publication. 😯"America is the sickest nation in the industrialized world" – close to 54% of kids have chronic illness! 🔥 This could be a GALILEO MOMENT to begin to fix the vaccine program & potentially save lives. 🌏 Why the silence? WE will not be silenced. Watch “An Inconvenient Study” by going to Download it. Share it with your friends. YOU are the distribution system.

🚨 Hidden camera footage reveals information about the circumstances surrounding the unpublished vaccine study from the award-winning film “An Inconvenient Study!” 💉Dr. Marcus Zervos of Henry Ford Health admits that a study shows differences between vaccinated & unvaccinated kids, but fears he’d “need to retire” if he submitted it for publication. 😯"America is the sickest nation in the industrialized world" – close to 54% of kids have chronic illness! 🔥 This could be a GALILEO MOMENT to begin to fix the vaccine program & potentially save lives. 🌏 Why the silence? WE will not be silenced. Watch “An Inconvenient Study” by going to Download it. Share it with your friends. YOU are the distribution system.

The HighWire

37,982 次观看 • 8 个月前

Dr. Paul Thomas: A pediatrician with over 10,000 active patients published a peer-reviewed study on children in his practice, comparing health outcomes of the variably vaccinated to the completely unvaccinated. The results were staggering. The data revealed a dramatic increase in nearly all chronic conditions among the vaccinated group: ADHD was virtually non-existent in the unvaccinated. Allergic conditions (asthma, eczema, allergic rhinitis) were significantly higher in the vaccinated. The vaccinated had a 300-400% higher rate of overall infections (ear, lung, sinus, etc.). Within days of publishing this science, his medical license was emergently suspended. He was declared a "threat to public health" for revealing data that challenges the official narrative. Pediatricians are good people who love children, but they are trapped in a system that feeds them garbage science and shields them from the truth. Our children are sicker than ever, and it's time to ask why.

Dr. Paul Thomas: A pediatrician with over 10,000 active patients published a peer-reviewed study on children in his practice, comparing health outcomes of the variably vaccinated to the completely unvaccinated. The results were staggering. The data revealed a dramatic increase in nearly all chronic conditions among the vaccinated group: ADHD was virtually non-existent in the unvaccinated. Allergic conditions (asthma, eczema, allergic rhinitis) were significantly higher in the vaccinated. The vaccinated had a 300-400% higher rate of overall infections (ear, lung, sinus, etc.). Within days of publishing this science, his medical license was emergently suspended. He was declared a "threat to public health" for revealing data that challenges the official narrative. Pediatricians are good people who love children, but they are trapped in a system that feeds them garbage science and shields them from the truth. Our children are sicker than ever, and it's time to ask why.

Camus

94,129 次观看 • 9 个月前

The Unsettling Truth: Not One Childhood Vaccine Was Tested Against a True Placebo In a Senate hearing, attorney Aaron Siri was asked by Sen. Ron Johnson to clarify the research behind childhood vaccines. His answer was staggering. Siri submitted a 66-page document to the Senate citing FDA clinical trial data. His finding? NOT A SINGLE routine childhood vaccine on the current CDC schedule was licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial where the control group received an inert saline placebo. The "control" groups were given another vaccine—which itself was not tested against a true placebo. This circular referencing means the entire schedule lacks a foundational gold-standard safety benchmark. Why does this matter? Because we are in the midst of a silent pandemic. A pandemic of chronic disease. Since the early 1980s, chronic illness in American children has skyrocketed from under 13% to over 50%. Most of these diseases—asthma, allergies, autoimmune disorders—are forms of immune system dysregulation. What has changed in that same timeframe? The childhood vaccine schedule. In 1986, when vaccine manufacturers were granted legal immunity, the schedule was 3 injections. Today, a child following the full CDC schedule receives 29 injections by their first birthday, including in utero. Every one of those vaccines was licensed by a company that knew it would not be liable for any injuries. In the face of a catastrophic rise in childhood chronic illness, is it not the most basic duty of public health to honestly and transparently investigate all environmental insults, including the exponential increase in vaccines? This isn't anti-vax. It's pro-science. It's a demand for the rigorous safety science our children deserve.

The Unsettling Truth: Not One Childhood Vaccine Was Tested Against a True Placebo In a Senate hearing, attorney Aaron Siri was asked by Sen. Ron Johnson to clarify the research behind childhood vaccines. His answer was staggering. Siri submitted a 66-page document to the Senate citing FDA clinical trial data. His finding? NOT A SINGLE routine childhood vaccine on the current CDC schedule was licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial where the control group received an inert saline placebo. The "control" groups were given another vaccine—which itself was not tested against a true placebo. This circular referencing means the entire schedule lacks a foundational gold-standard safety benchmark. Why does this matter? Because we are in the midst of a silent pandemic. A pandemic of chronic disease. Since the early 1980s, chronic illness in American children has skyrocketed from under 13% to over 50%. Most of these diseases—asthma, allergies, autoimmune disorders—are forms of immune system dysregulation. What has changed in that same timeframe? The childhood vaccine schedule. In 1986, when vaccine manufacturers were granted legal immunity, the schedule was 3 injections. Today, a child following the full CDC schedule receives 29 injections by their first birthday, including in utero. Every one of those vaccines was licensed by a company that knew it would not be liable for any injuries. In the face of a catastrophic rise in childhood chronic illness, is it not the most basic duty of public health to honestly and transparently investigate all environmental insults, including the exponential increase in vaccines? This isn't anti-vax. It's pro-science. It's a demand for the rigorous safety science our children deserve.

Camus

96,137 次观看 • 10 个月前

I make a point in the film that matters, and it keeps getting overlooked, probably because it’s inconvenient. If this study stood alone, fine. Take it with a grain of salt. That’s how science works. One study raises a question; it doesn’t settle the case. But this study does not stand alone. It’s now by my count the fifth study to compare vaccinated children to completely unvaccinated children. And every single time, the signal is the same. The vaccinated are sicker. Not once- not one time anywhere in the world- has a retrospective study compared these two groups and shown that vaccinated children are healthier. Not by a government. Not by a major health agency. Not by a prestigious institution. Not in the U.S., not in Europe, not anywhere. So let me ask the most obvious question there is: Wasn’t that the whole point of the vaccine program? Watch the rest with Mike Rowe and see the movie at

I make a point in the film that matters, and it keeps getting overlooked, probably because it’s inconvenient. If this study stood alone, fine. Take it with a grain of salt. That’s how science works. One study raises a question; it doesn’t settle the case. But this study does not stand alone. It’s now by my count the fifth study to compare vaccinated children to completely unvaccinated children. And every single time, the signal is the same. The vaccinated are sicker. Not once- not one time anywhere in the world- has a retrospective study compared these two groups and shown that vaccinated children are healthier. Not by a government. Not by a major health agency. Not by a prestigious institution. Not in the U.S., not in Europe, not anywhere. So let me ask the most obvious question there is: Wasn’t that the whole point of the vaccine program? Watch the rest with Mike Rowe and see the movie at

Del Bigtree

24,900 次观看 • 6 个月前

For years, the public has been told a comprehensive, government-sponsored study comparing the health of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated populations was unnecessary. Yet, every time an independent group manages to do it, the results are deeply concerning. Now, a bombshell has dropped. A new study led by Dr. Marcus Zervos—head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center, a pro-vaccine scientist renowned for exposing the Flint water crisis—has been released. His team, entirely pro-vaccine and from a prestigious institution, found that in almost every health category, the vaccinated cohort is faring far worse. This hearing was supposed to be about that science. Instead, after having every one of his points dismantled, a public health official’s closing argument was not a defense of data. It was a rebuke of emotion and a warning about "threats" and "mobs." He pleaded for civility for scientists. This is the ultimate insult. It is a deliberate attempt to dehumanize and caricature parents of vaccine-injured children—who filled the room—as a violent mob, rather than engage with their evidence. These parents are the opposite of a threat. They are the heart of this movement. They spend their days caring for injured children, and their spare moments trying to warn others: "Look out. Don't let this happen to you." They are giving, beautiful, and courageous. To be lectured on civility by a system that has dismissed their suffering, ridiculed them, and supported policies that kicked their children out of school and them out of their jobs? It is the height of absurdity. When they can't win on science, they reframe the debate around safety. This had nothing to do with violence. It had everything to do with silencing dissent and avoiding accountability for a failing paradigm.

For years, the public has been told a comprehensive, government-sponsored study comparing the health of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated populations was unnecessary. Yet, every time an independent group manages to do it, the results are deeply concerning. Now, a bombshell has dropped. A new study led by Dr. Marcus Zervos—head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center, a pro-vaccine scientist renowned for exposing the Flint water crisis—has been released. His team, entirely pro-vaccine and from a prestigious institution, found that in almost every health category, the vaccinated cohort is faring far worse. This hearing was supposed to be about that science. Instead, after having every one of his points dismantled, a public health official’s closing argument was not a defense of data. It was a rebuke of emotion and a warning about "threats" and "mobs." He pleaded for civility for scientists. This is the ultimate insult. It is a deliberate attempt to dehumanize and caricature parents of vaccine-injured children—who filled the room—as a violent mob, rather than engage with their evidence. These parents are the opposite of a threat. They are the heart of this movement. They spend their days caring for injured children, and their spare moments trying to warn others: "Look out. Don't let this happen to you." They are giving, beautiful, and courageous. To be lectured on civility by a system that has dismissed their suffering, ridiculed them, and supported policies that kicked their children out of school and them out of their jobs? It is the height of absurdity. When they can't win on science, they reframe the debate around safety. This had nothing to do with violence. It had everything to do with silencing dissent and avoiding accountability for a failing paradigm.

Camus

55,308 次观看 • 9 个月前