Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

A new study analyzed daily temperatures from 992 long-running weather stations across 29 countries covering the years 1899 to 2024. Then it compared those temperatures to cumulative human CO2 emissions. They don't match. From 1899 to 1940, the planet warmed at a rate of 0.022 C per year, even... though emissions were low. Then from 1941 to 1982, temperatures cooled, despite CO2 emissions more than tripling. From 1983 to 2024, warming returned, but slower than before, at a rate of 0.017 C per year, even as emissions rose 8.6 times higher than during the earlier warming phase. As the author conclude: "These findings challenge the conventional assumption that human-induced CO2 is the primary driver of global warming." This is because the strongest warming occurred before major modern emissions kicked in, and later periods with far more CO2 show weaker warming, or even cooling. Earth's climate is still governed by natural variability.show more

Electroverse

48,327 subscribers

32,954 views • 19 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

33 Comments

Eleanor Hall PhD, RN18 days ago

Global warming/climate change has always been one of the Fabian's strategies to bring the world under their evil control. The link to the study would be nice:

Richard J. Sexton/ORSC?VR.x19 days ago

Only if you use the adjusted data. If you don't it's not as warm as the 1930s. Ref: NOAA Station data.

Bibek17 days ago

Thanks. As the author, I am happy to answer any questions. Btw, ALL data used in this study is PUBLIC. No s-o-t-a Climate Models, no gimmicks, Just pure data and science.

Jeff Jagster19 days ago

Good points. But, CO2 is not visible. It is an invisible odorless gas. You are breathing it out right now. And is completely harmless. Stop showing propaganda smoke stack towers spewing water vapor (not CO2) while you are talking about harmless CO2.

Joseph Jackson19 days ago

World Population: 1888=1.25 billion/. 1925=2 billion/. 1975=4 billion / 2025=8 billion. Doubled and doubled again! The temperature is still within the “Standard Deviation”. What a load of nonsense !

Sara Karan18 days ago

The junk science is revealed, time and time again, for anyone interested enough to look. But the indoctrination continues. The higher the education the more the grooming takes hold.

Joseph Jackson18 days ago

Thought I would jump back into the fray! Right now Nebraska corn 🌽 is gobbling up all CO2 it can. It is removing the carbon in order to grow ( just like all plant life does) and “ popping out” oxygen! That’s how photosynthesis works! By the way , Oxygen levels have not been affected by this so called crisis . In fact they are steady and possibly slightly above normal !!!

David Howard Seth 🇺🇸 ✡️18 days ago

We forget, or are never taught, that the was mere removed decades from the ending of a "mini ice age" that lasted from the 14th to the middle of the 19th century. Temperatures generally rise immediately FOLLOWING AN ICE AGE

Erik Magnethi19 days ago

@respect65

Connor Overachiever19 days ago

Top-down consensus built on one variable ...dissent not allowed. Same script as the fiat standard ...IMO the experts stay certain right up until the data embarrasses them.

Olivier LAHAYE18 days ago

Y’a un gros truc pas loin de la terre qu’on nomme soleil ☀️ qui semble jouer un rôle… mais allez savoir lequel… 😅

Richard Rothwell18 days ago

When you imagine you are smarter than a climate scientist, so incompetent bullshit by an amateur is now called “new study”. There are results in the scientific literature already, musing over the temperature plateau in 1940 to 1980 period…

ProLibertateSemper19 days ago

We knew that long ago! But in appreciate this new study, it’s perfect!

Bob Gorovoi (fiery but mostly peaceful)18 days ago

The relationship of co2 in atmosphere to additional greenhouse effect is a logarithmic one It has greater effect at lower concentrations We are now at the point where every extra molecule adds less warming A doubling from now would hardly be noticed Except by the vegetation..

BZ509 Bee-Zed18 days ago

Until there is 4 Billion years of actual data, these little short term data points mean absolutely NOTHING!!!

Kom18 days ago

They hide this from everyone!

Carol Joy19 days ago

1 of 2 One thing to watch out for - weather stations across the USA have been moved. For instance, I grew up inside Chicagoland, where it is always cooler by the lake. But the weather station near Lake Michigan was moved in the 1980's out to O'Hare airport, nowhere near the lake.

Johannez19 days ago

@grok can you fact check these claims?

Dreadric18 days ago

More sun = more warming Less sun = less warming What they should probably look at is solar cycles, fluctuations, radiation e.t.c, I think that is a bigger predictor. Also variations in how far we are from the sun probably also changes the heating and cooling over the same scale.

Richard Rothwell18 days ago

… In science it’s mandatory to relate your novel results to past results. Otherwise it’s cheating. Then there is the attempt to deny temperature/CO2 correlation. This is stupid when dealing with a multivariate system.

Cliff Cady18 days ago

New Peer Reviewed Study: CO2 has Zero Impact on Climate Change when the atmosphere becomes saturated with Carbon Dioxide, much like a sponge, it can only hold so much.

Rollatorrentner17 days ago

Mal eine Frage an die Experten ha an Solarfläche in der Sonne strahlt keine Wärme ab, oder?

Who is John Galt?18 days ago

Earth's climate is still governed by things we don't understand.

Salama Al Mansouri19 days ago

Studies come and go. The Good Feeling path is to Honor the Earth that sustains us. Go with Source Flow to Thrive, go against It to Deplete. That includes how we treat our Planet.

James Franck18 days ago

What’s your source? “a new study”? Weak.

MBentley18 days ago

That would make sense IF you exclude all external factors... They mention aerosol cooling effects as a final piece, and only from 1980 so shows marginal (relative) impact... As no data prior, it seems to be written off entirely in their calcs. I wonder what happened around there

NewbieForeva18 days ago

So basically global warming poor climate change cult is a scam

Piedad19 days ago

🤔

Mortis18 days ago

Of course they don't match - warming precedes co2 release as it lowers water's ability to hold dissolved co2. Sunlight warms the oceans and they outgass C02 just in time for plants to start growing, you know, since it's getting warmer.

Suchend 💜🐭 LNPs = nightmare, esp. with modRNA18 days ago

of course they dont. CO2 is following temperature at most.

Fåret - The Sheep 🏴18 days ago

The oceans outgas CO2 when warmer.

SurroundedByIdiots18 days ago

Where's the study?

a Johnson for the news17 days ago

The biggest mystery about climate science is how it became so corrupt

Related Videos

New research claims human emissions are not driving atmospheric CO2. A paper by Dai Ato ran multiple linear regressions for 1959 to 2022, testing two predictors of the annual CO2 increase: sea surface temperature and human emissions. The result was clear: when the oceans warmed, CO2 levels rose almost exactly in step - about two to three parts per million for every one degree Celsius of warming. Adding human emissions to the model didn't change the outcome. Using only ocean temperature, the model reproduced global CO2 levels with near-perfect accuracy - a correlation of 0.995 and an error of just one to two ppm by 2022. The main factor governing the annual increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration is sea surface temperature rather than human emissions. Earlier studies have shown the same pattern. Temperature changes first, CO2 follows. If Ato is correct, cutting human emissions won't lower atmospheric CO2 because it's the oceans that set the pace.

New research claims human emissions are not driving atmospheric CO2. A paper by Dai Ato ran multiple linear regressions for 1959 to 2022, testing two predictors of the annual CO2 increase: sea surface temperature and human emissions. The result was clear: when the oceans warmed, CO2 levels rose almost exactly in step - about two to three parts per million for every one degree Celsius of warming. Adding human emissions to the model didn't change the outcome. Using only ocean temperature, the model reproduced global CO2 levels with near-perfect accuracy - a correlation of 0.995 and an error of just one to two ppm by 2022. The main factor governing the annual increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration is sea surface temperature rather than human emissions. Earlier studies have shown the same pattern. Temperature changes first, CO2 follows. If Ato is correct, cutting human emissions won't lower atmospheric CO2 because it's the oceans that set the pace.

Electroverse

215,947 views • 2 months ago

Professor Emeritus Dr Ian Plimer calls it "the great CO2 fraud." For decades we have been told that human CO2 drives global warming, but Plimer points out: "No one has ever demonstrated that human emissions drive temperature." Ice cores show the opposite of the narrative. "Temperature rises first," says Plimer, "and only centuries later does CO2 follow." For more than 200 years, chemistry has shown that CO2 is the gas of life, not a pollutant and not a threat. The planet is far greener today because of higher atmospheric CO2 levels, and crop yields are breaking records. According to Plimer, 'runaway warming' is not science, it is propaganda built on inversion and fear.

Professor Emeritus Dr Ian Plimer calls it "the great CO2 fraud." For decades we have been told that human CO2 drives global warming, but Plimer points out: "No one has ever demonstrated that human emissions drive temperature." Ice cores show the opposite of the narrative. "Temperature rises first," says Plimer, "and only centuries later does CO2 follow." For more than 200 years, chemistry has shown that CO2 is the gas of life, not a pollutant and not a threat. The planet is far greener today because of higher atmospheric CO2 levels, and crop yields are breaking records. According to Plimer, 'runaway warming' is not science, it is propaganda built on inversion and fear.

Electroverse

35,724 views • 1 month ago

The Central England temperature record contains a big problem for the CO2 narrative. From 1695 to 1735, Britain warmed by about 2C as it emerged from the Little Ice Age. During that warming though, atmospheric CO2 remained almost flat. Fast forward to today, Britain is shown to have warmed about 1.5C since the 1980s--so over a similar time period. Activists insist today's 1.5C of warming must be human-driven. But the historical record shows the climate warmed more, naturally. If CO2 wasn't the driver back then, why must it be the driver now?

The Central England temperature record contains a big problem for the CO2 narrative. From 1695 to 1735, Britain warmed by about 2C as it emerged from the Little Ice Age. During that warming though, atmospheric CO2 remained almost flat. Fast forward to today, Britain is shown to have warmed about 1.5C since the 1980s--so over a similar time period. Activists insist today's 1.5C of warming must be human-driven. But the historical record shows the climate warmed more, naturally. If CO2 wasn't the driver back then, why must it be the driver now?

Electroverse

14,426 views • 1 month ago

"We're not in a crisis. There is no climate emergency." Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer: "It has never been proven that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming." "Only 3% of emissions are from humans, the rest is natural... So if you're to prove that humans, and their emissions of the the gas of life, change climate, then you also have to prove that the natural emissions—97% of all emissions—don't change climate. That has never been addressed."

"We're not in a crisis. There is no climate emergency." Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer: "It has never been proven that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming." "Only 3% of emissions are from humans, the rest is natural... So if you're to prove that humans, and their emissions of the the gas of life, change climate, then you also have to prove that the natural emissions—97% of all emissions—don't change climate. That has never been addressed."

Wide Awake Media

234,348 views • 2 years ago

A new study reconstructs the abrupt warming events of the last ice age. Between 57,000 and 29,000 years ago, Greenland experienced 11 sharp temperature bursts, warming 10C to 16C in a matter of just 50 to 200 years. CO2 levels remained low and stable during this time. The historical record is clear. Earth's climate has shifted far more violently and rapidly in the past, even when CO2 stayed steady.

A new study reconstructs the abrupt warming events of the last ice age. Between 57,000 and 29,000 years ago, Greenland experienced 11 sharp temperature bursts, warming 10C to 16C in a matter of just 50 to 200 years. CO2 levels remained low and stable during this time. The historical record is clear. Earth's climate has shifted far more violently and rapidly in the past, even when CO2 stayed steady.

Electroverse

13,066 views • 7 months ago

VARNEY: We were always told that coal is the dirtiest fuel, that there are more CO2 emissions from coal than from natural gas. Is that no longer true? BURGUM: It's true, but then the question goes back to the reversal of the endangerment finding, which is, is CO2 a pollutant or is it something that helps plants grow? We know it does the latter for sure

VARNEY: We were always told that coal is the dirtiest fuel, that there are more CO2 emissions from coal than from natural gas. Is that no longer true? BURGUM: It's true, but then the question goes back to the reversal of the endangerment finding, which is, is CO2 a pollutant or is it something that helps plants grow? We know it does the latter for sure

Aaron Rupar

175,336 views • 7 months ago

365 years of temperature data from central England, the world's longest running climate record, show no trend. Despite a six-fold rise in population and a surge in CO2, January temperatures have barely shifted since 1600. Likewise for July, the hottest month of the year, temperatures are virtually unchanged. Even during the coal-fired Industrial Revolution there was no sudden spike. The warmest winters on record occurred in the 1700s, the 1800s, and the early 1900s, long before modern emissions. Any warming appears slow and natural, with the slight modern uptick likely linked to two factors: 1) the urban heat island effect, and 2) Earth's gradual recovery from the Little Ice Age. If carbon dioxide truly controlled the climate, the CET record would shoot upward on the right. It does not.

365 years of temperature data from central England, the world's longest running climate record, show no trend. Despite a six-fold rise in population and a surge in CO2, January temperatures have barely shifted since 1600. Likewise for July, the hottest month of the year, temperatures are virtually unchanged. Even during the coal-fired Industrial Revolution there was no sudden spike. The warmest winters on record occurred in the 1700s, the 1800s, and the early 1900s, long before modern emissions. Any warming appears slow and natural, with the slight modern uptick likely linked to two factors: 1) the urban heat island effect, and 2) Earth's gradual recovery from the Little Ice Age. If carbon dioxide truly controlled the climate, the CET record would shoot upward on the right. It does not.

Electroverse

250,157 views • 6 months ago

A new study shows rising carbon dioxide has driven a 30% jump in global plant growth since 1900, the equivalent of adding three Amazon rainforests worth of vegetation to the planet. The study also points out that 10,000 years ago, Earth was even greener. Logically, that means CO2 levels back then must have been higher than today's, long before industry or fossil fuels. The paper also finds that since 1750, nature's own CO2 output has risen four times more than humanity's, about 44 gigatons a year compared to 11 from us. CO2 is rising anyway via natural cycles, not human activity alone.

A new study shows rising carbon dioxide has driven a 30% jump in global plant growth since 1900, the equivalent of adding three Amazon rainforests worth of vegetation to the planet. The study also points out that 10,000 years ago, Earth was even greener. Logically, that means CO2 levels back then must have been higher than today's, long before industry or fossil fuels. The paper also finds that since 1750, nature's own CO2 output has risen four times more than humanity's, about 44 gigatons a year compared to 11 from us. CO2 is rising anyway via natural cycles, not human activity alone.

Electroverse

19,960 views • 1 month ago

Australian geologist, Professor Ian Plimer: "No one has yet shown that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming, and if they did, they'd also have to show that the natural emissions—and that's 97% of the total—don't drive global warming." "Then I look back in time through my geological eyes, and look at times in the past when we have very high carbon dioxide contents of the atmosphere, up to hundreds of times higher than now, and we see that we didn't have runaway global warming… But what we did have is six major ice ages, and there is no correlation over geological time between carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and temperature." Full interview: For more content like this, visit: #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero

Australian geologist, Professor Ian Plimer: "No one has yet shown that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming, and if they did, they'd also have to show that the natural emissions—and that's 97% of the total—don't drive global warming." "Then I look back in time through my geological eyes, and look at times in the past when we have very high carbon dioxide contents of the atmosphere, up to hundreds of times higher than now, and we see that we didn't have runaway global warming… But what we did have is six major ice ages, and there is no correlation over geological time between carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and temperature." Full interview: For more content like this, visit: #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero

Wide Awake Media

653,011 views • 3 years ago

"The whole thing is a fallacy right from the start." Geologist Ian Plimer dispels the "climate crisis" narrative, arguing that no scientific paper to date has demonstrated human-induced carbon dioxide emissions as a driver of global warming. He maintains that climate models fail because they assume CO₂ drives temperature rise, which he describes as a religious belief unsupported by evidence.

"The whole thing is a fallacy right from the start." Geologist Ian Plimer dispels the "climate crisis" narrative, arguing that no scientific paper to date has demonstrated human-induced carbon dioxide emissions as a driver of global warming. He maintains that climate models fail because they assume CO₂ drives temperature rise, which he describes as a religious belief unsupported by evidence.

Wide Awake Media

49,163 views • 2 months ago

Scientific Bombshell Shatters the Climate Change Narrative A groundbreaking new study has found that CO2 "may have little to no further warming effect" on the Earth's atmosphere. The striking finding that made the authors come to this conclusion is the fact that the Earth's atmosphere already contains over 6 kg/m² of CO2, which is ten times the "saturation mass" needed for the gas to absorb radiation. This means that additional CO2 emissions might not significantly increase global temperatures, as the atmosphere has already absorbed nearly all the heat it can within the CO2 spectrum. The study, titled “Climatic consequences of the process of saturation of radiation absorption in gases,” was published in Applications in Engineering Science. These findings support the argument made by independent researchers like Randall Carlson, who actually claims that CO2 comes with many benefits, such as boosting plant growth and crop yields. He says, “Hundreds of studies have consistently demonstrated significant improvements in plant growth, crop yields, and drought resistance under elevated CO2 conditions.” This latest study aligns with what Carlson has been saying all along and is absolutely devastating for the climate change narrative.

Scientific Bombshell Shatters the Climate Change Narrative A groundbreaking new study has found that CO2 "may have little to no further warming effect" on the Earth's atmosphere. The striking finding that made the authors come to this conclusion is the fact that the Earth's atmosphere already contains over 6 kg/m² of CO2, which is ten times the "saturation mass" needed for the gas to absorb radiation. This means that additional CO2 emissions might not significantly increase global temperatures, as the atmosphere has already absorbed nearly all the heat it can within the CO2 spectrum. The study, titled “Climatic consequences of the process of saturation of radiation absorption in gases,” was published in Applications in Engineering Science. These findings support the argument made by independent researchers like Randall Carlson, who actually claims that CO2 comes with many benefits, such as boosting plant growth and crop yields. He says, “Hundreds of studies have consistently demonstrated significant improvements in plant growth, crop yields, and drought resistance under elevated CO2 conditions.” This latest study aligns with what Carlson has been saying all along and is absolutely devastating for the climate change narrative.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

437,820 views • 1 year ago

Geologist, Prof. Ian Plimer, on the climate hoax: "The whole thing is a scientific house of cards." "For some years, I have been pursuing leading scientists with a fundamental question, and that is: 'Can you please show me half a dozen scientific papers that demonstrate that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming?'... I've never had an answer." "But just imagine someone gave me half a dozen scientific papers. They would also have to show me that the natural emissions, which are 97% of the total, don't drive global warming. So it's checkmate before the game starts." Credit: James Freeman @tntradiolive

Geologist, Prof. Ian Plimer, on the climate hoax: "The whole thing is a scientific house of cards." "For some years, I have been pursuing leading scientists with a fundamental question, and that is: 'Can you please show me half a dozen scientific papers that demonstrate that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming?'... I've never had an answer." "But just imagine someone gave me half a dozen scientific papers. They would also have to show me that the natural emissions, which are 97% of the total, don't drive global warming. So it's checkmate before the game starts." Credit: James Freeman @tntradiolive

Wide Awake Media

152,067 views • 2 years ago

Today's warming is not unusual. A new study using Antarctic ice core data reveals the roughly 1.1C warming of the past century is not unusual in Earth's climate history. The research analyzes temperatures preserved in ice cores stretching back hundreds of thousands of years. Looking at the last 20,000 years, the study finds that 16% of all centuries warmed by at least 1.1C. In other words, roughly one out of every six centuries warmed as much, or more, as the past hundred years. Also, the ice core records show temperatures rising about 12C since the last ice age, with the last interglacial period around 125,000 years ago several degrees warmer than today. The modern 1.1C century scale increase falls well within natural variability. There is nothing alarming or unprecedented or even rare occurring with Earth's climate.

Today's warming is not unusual. A new study using Antarctic ice core data reveals the roughly 1.1C warming of the past century is not unusual in Earth's climate history. The research analyzes temperatures preserved in ice cores stretching back hundreds of thousands of years. Looking at the last 20,000 years, the study finds that 16% of all centuries warmed by at least 1.1C. In other words, roughly one out of every six centuries warmed as much, or more, as the past hundred years. Also, the ice core records show temperatures rising about 12C since the last ice age, with the last interglacial period around 125,000 years ago several degrees warmer than today. The modern 1.1C century scale increase falls well within natural variability. There is nothing alarming or unprecedented or even rare occurring with Earth's climate.

Electroverse

17,876 views • 3 months ago

Back in 1948, Swedish glaciologist Hans Ahlmann documented warming temperatures and glacier retreat from the late 1800s to the 1940s. He called it "climatic improvement." Finland warmed 1.8 C in that period, and the growing season lengthened by up to three weeks. It was viewed as beneficial, not a crisis - a natural post-little ice age warming. In 1948, roughly 2 C of warming in 50 years was considered a "fluctuation" and an "improvement." In 2025, however, a 1 C warm up in 50 years is justification for economy-wide controls, speech restrictions and trillion-dollar climate industries. Ahlmann's work dismantles the modern narrative. The planet has warmed more naturally, even within living memory.

Back in 1948, Swedish glaciologist Hans Ahlmann documented warming temperatures and glacier retreat from the late 1800s to the 1940s. He called it "climatic improvement." Finland warmed 1.8 C in that period, and the growing season lengthened by up to three weeks. It was viewed as beneficial, not a crisis - a natural post-little ice age warming. In 1948, roughly 2 C of warming in 50 years was considered a "fluctuation" and an "improvement." In 2025, however, a 1 C warm up in 50 years is justification for economy-wide controls, speech restrictions and trillion-dollar climate industries. Ahlmann's work dismantles the modern narrative. The planet has warmed more naturally, even within living memory.

Electroverse

19,670 views • 1 month ago

Climate zealot explains why cows are "a big problem". 🤡 "They produce an awful lot of methane, and that is a problem because it is a big contributor to human-caused global warming." "Livestock account for about a third of all the methane emissions, almost as much as leaks from the fossil fuel industry... So it's a big problem." "If you cut off the amount of methane going up into the air, you very quickly make a big difference to the amount of global warming."

Climate zealot explains why cows are "a big problem". 🤡 "They produce an awful lot of methane, and that is a problem because it is a big contributor to human-caused global warming." "Livestock account for about a third of all the methane emissions, almost as much as leaks from the fossil fuel industry... So it's a big problem." "If you cut off the amount of methane going up into the air, you very quickly make a big difference to the amount of global warming."

Wide Awake Media

52,730 views • 11 months ago

Antarctica Has Not Warmed An analysis by Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. shows no meaningful warming across Antarctica over the satellite era. Two independent temperature records were examined from 1979 to 2023. First, reconstructed surface air temperatures from Ma et al. (2025) show a continent-wide trend of about +0.032C per decade, with today COLDER than 1979. Second, UAH satellite data for south of 60S show an even smaller trend: +0.017C per decade, which is effectively flat. Two independent systems. The same conclusion. Since 1979, Antarctica has undergone no statistically meaningful warming, despite atmospheric CO2 rising by nearly 100 ppm.

Antarctica Has Not Warmed An analysis by Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. shows no meaningful warming across Antarctica over the satellite era. Two independent temperature records were examined from 1979 to 2023. First, reconstructed surface air temperatures from Ma et al. (2025) show a continent-wide trend of about +0.032C per decade, with today COLDER than 1979. Second, UAH satellite data for south of 60S show an even smaller trend: +0.017C per decade, which is effectively flat. Two independent systems. The same conclusion. Since 1979, Antarctica has undergone no statistically meaningful warming, despite atmospheric CO2 rising by nearly 100 ppm.

Electroverse

22,162 views • 8 months ago

CO2 is treated like pollution, but it is the carbon source for life. Plants use CO2, water, and sunlight to build sugars, (i.e. photosynthesis) - the base of the food chain. No CO2. No plants. No biosphere as we know it. NASA satellite data shows Earth has greened significantly since the early 1980s. CO2 fertilization is the major driver. Commercial greenhouses often raise CO2 to 1,500 ppm to boost yields. For most of Earth history, CO2 was far higher than it is today - far higher than the levels in commercial greenhouses, even. During parts of the deep past, life exploded at more than 6,000 ppm. Yet today, at 420 ppm, the gas plants need to live has been turned into a political toxin. But CO2 is not pollution, it is the backbone of life.

CO2 is treated like pollution, but it is the carbon source for life. Plants use CO2, water, and sunlight to build sugars, (i.e. photosynthesis) - the base of the food chain. No CO2. No plants. No biosphere as we know it. NASA satellite data shows Earth has greened significantly since the early 1980s. CO2 fertilization is the major driver. Commercial greenhouses often raise CO2 to 1,500 ppm to boost yields. For most of Earth history, CO2 was far higher than it is today - far higher than the levels in commercial greenhouses, even. During parts of the deep past, life exploded at more than 6,000 ppm. Yet today, at 420 ppm, the gas plants need to live has been turned into a political toxin. But CO2 is not pollution, it is the backbone of life.

Electroverse

31,215 views • 4 months ago

A new study analyzed more than 200 fossil mollusk shells from coastal deposits on South Australia's Yorke Peninsula. The shells date to two past warm periods: the last interglacial (about 127,000 to 115,000 years ago), and the Holocene (which began around 11,700 years ago). Scientists measured oxygen and carbon isotopes preserved in the shells to reconstruct ancient sea temperatures. The results show SSTs were often 4C warmer than today. During the last interglacial, reconstructed temperatures ranged from 17.6C to 22.9C. For comparison, modern coastal waters typically range from about 15C to 19C. Sea levels were higher in the past too As much as 5 meters above present during the last interglacial, and up to 3 meters higher during the mid-Holocene. Warmer and higher seas occurred naturally long before modern emissions.

A new study analyzed more than 200 fossil mollusk shells from coastal deposits on South Australia's Yorke Peninsula. The shells date to two past warm periods: the last interglacial (about 127,000 to 115,000 years ago), and the Holocene (which began around 11,700 years ago). Scientists measured oxygen and carbon isotopes preserved in the shells to reconstruct ancient sea temperatures. The results show SSTs were often 4C warmer than today. During the last interglacial, reconstructed temperatures ranged from 17.6C to 22.9C. For comparison, modern coastal waters typically range from about 15C to 19C. Sea levels were higher in the past too As much as 5 meters above present during the last interglacial, and up to 3 meters higher during the mid-Holocene. Warmer and higher seas occurred naturally long before modern emissions.

Electroverse

12,263 views • 6 months ago

A new study finds no abnormal warming across Antarctica or the high southern latitudes, none in the past 12,000 years. Using advanced ice core analysis, researchers show temperatures have varied naturally through the Holocene with no sustained warming trend. The slight rise noted from 1950 to 1990 falls entirely within natural variability, just 0.2 to 0.3 C. Key Antarctic climate indices (the Southern Annular Mode, Zona Wave 3 and Indian Ocean Dipole) all remain stable and within natural bounds. Antarctica is not warming abnormally, as the headlines claim. If anything, the data show cooling since 1990.

A new study finds no abnormal warming across Antarctica or the high southern latitudes, none in the past 12,000 years. Using advanced ice core analysis, researchers show temperatures have varied naturally through the Holocene with no sustained warming trend. The slight rise noted from 1950 to 1990 falls entirely within natural variability, just 0.2 to 0.3 C. Key Antarctic climate indices (the Southern Annular Mode, Zona Wave 3 and Indian Ocean Dipole) all remain stable and within natural bounds. Antarctica is not warming abnormally, as the headlines claim. If anything, the data show cooling since 1990.

Electroverse

10,265 views • 1 month ago