Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

A Short Video explaining the Important Concept of Position Sizing and Risk Management "Never Risk more than 1% of you Portfolio on a single trade."

VVVStockAnalyst's profile picture

Volatility Volume and Value

126,441 subscribers

38,076 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииОбразованиеФинансы
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Trade management + Position sizing =compounding phase Position sizing is the backbone: risk per trade,fixed %, volatility-based, or Kelly—get it wrong, blow the account. Why ES is better then NQ especially during the risk of ruin for many: lower cost = more contracts = better scaling = tighter risk control. Free position sizing tool in comment. If this video or tool helps retweet please
7:53

Trade management + Position sizing =compounding phase Position sizing is the backbone: risk per trade,fixed %, volatility-based, or Kelly—get it wrong, blow the account. Why ES is better then NQ especially during the risk of ruin for many: lower cost = more contracts = better scaling = tighter risk control. Free position sizing tool in comment. If this video or tool helps retweet please

The Daily Profiler

20,136 просмотров • 1 год назад

this 1 hour MIT lecture on portfolio management is the single best video from the Mathematics in Finance series. a former Morgan Stanley trader teaches you more about diversification and position sizing than most learn in years. 26 lectures in the course. all free. save this.
1:28:37

this 1 hour MIT lecture on portfolio management is the single best video from the Mathematics in Finance series. a former Morgan Stanley trader teaches you more about diversification and position sizing than most learn in years. 26 lectures in the course. all free. save this.

Goshawk Trades

122,667 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The 3-5-7 rule is a disciplined risk management framework in day trading designed to protect capital and maximize profitability. It dictates: 3% maximum risk on a single trade, 5% maximum total risk across all open positions (portfolio exposure), and a 7:1 risk-reward ratio or a 7% minimum profit target on winners.
37:09

The 3-5-7 rule is a disciplined risk management framework in day trading designed to protect capital and maximize profitability. It dictates: 3% maximum risk on a single trade, 5% maximum total risk across all open positions (portfolio exposure), and a 7:1 risk-reward ratio or a 7% minimum profit target on winners.

Market Rebellion

16,567 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Here is an Hour Long Masterclass on - How to read the market - How to take trades - Risk management - Position sizing And much more $SPY
57:10

Here is an Hour Long Masterclass on - How to read the market - How to take trades - Risk management - Position sizing And much more $SPY

Justin Banks

44,952 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

One common reason why traders blow up is because of poor position sizing. In other words, how much do you bet on a trade. You can be right on direction 60% of the time and still lose everything if you size your positions poorly. One oversized trade can wipe out months of gains. This is why position sizing is a big part of risk management. Sandeep Rao - SEBI Reg. RA🖖 recently spoke to Tom Basso, one of the original Market Wizards, to discuss his approach to trading. I was listening to the interview and the one thing that stood out to me was how Tom's thinking on position sizing evolved over decades. He started simple: risk the same percentage of equity on every trade, inspired by Larry Hite's philosophy that every bet should be equal in terms of potential loss. But then came a silver trade with explosive volatility. Clients were calling, nervous about the wild swings. So he realized it wasn't just about the amount you could lose—it was also about the speed of movement. High volatility creates psychological stress that leads to poor decisions. So he added a second layer: volatility as a percentage of equity. Now he'd calculate both risk % and volatility %, then take the smaller of the two. Then came the third refinement: margin-to-equity ratios. Some markets have deceptively low risk and volatility but require high margin because of sudden jump risk. By incorporating all three factors, he never got caught overexposed. The result was a position sizing system that automatically scales down when markets get too volatile, protects against margin squeezes, and keeps portfolio risk in check. It's really interesting conversation. Link to the full interview is in the comments.
4:58

One common reason why traders blow up is because of poor position sizing. In other words, how much do you bet on a trade. You can be right on direction 60% of the time and still lose everything if you size your positions poorly. One oversized trade can wipe out months of gains. This is why position sizing is a big part of risk management. Sandeep Rao - SEBI Reg. RA🖖 recently spoke to Tom Basso, one of the original Market Wizards, to discuss his approach to trading. I was listening to the interview and the one thing that stood out to me was how Tom's thinking on position sizing evolved over decades. He started simple: risk the same percentage of equity on every trade, inspired by Larry Hite's philosophy that every bet should be equal in terms of potential loss. But then came a silver trade with explosive volatility. Clients were calling, nervous about the wild swings. So he realized it wasn't just about the amount you could lose—it was also about the speed of movement. High volatility creates psychological stress that leads to poor decisions. So he added a second layer: volatility as a percentage of equity. Now he'd calculate both risk % and volatility %, then take the smaller of the two. Then came the third refinement: margin-to-equity ratios. Some markets have deceptively low risk and volatility but require high margin because of sudden jump risk. By incorporating all three factors, he never got caught overexposed. The result was a position sizing system that automatically scales down when markets get too volatile, protects against margin squeezes, and keeps portfolio risk in check. It's really interesting conversation. Link to the full interview is in the comments.

Nithin Kamath

59,213 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Most traders optimize everything — except fees. Entries, position sizing, risk management. Fees are simply accepted as part of the rules. We changed the rules. See below.
0:37

Most traders optimize everything — except fees. Entries, position sizing, risk management. Fees are simply accepted as part of the rules. We changed the rules. See below.

Feebate

63,180 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Basically explaining why I closed my short and flipped scalp LONG on $BTC Trading on my public 300k account, with a 2% risk on this trade. What do you think?
5:35

Basically explaining why I closed my short and flipped scalp LONG on $BTC Trading on my public 300k account, with a 2% risk on this trade. What do you think?

Diego Trades🐒🃏

22,208 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

A portfolio is not a collection of isolated positions. Yet much of crypto credit infrastructure still treats it that way. Institutional trading firms manage exposure across exchanges, venues, and strategies simultaneously. Evaluating each position independently can overstate the risk that actually matters: the portfolio as a whole. That's why portfolio-based margining matters. Spark Prime uses Arkis technology to evaluate exposure across DeFi and CeFi venues, allowing financing decisions to reflect net portfolio risk rather than treating each position in isolation. Read more about Spark Prime👇
0:21

A portfolio is not a collection of isolated positions. Yet much of crypto credit infrastructure still treats it that way. Institutional trading firms manage exposure across exchanges, venues, and strategies simultaneously. Evaluating each position independently can overstate the risk that actually matters: the portfolio as a whole. That's why portfolio-based margining matters. Spark Prime uses Arkis technology to evaluate exposure across DeFi and CeFi venues, allowing financing decisions to reflect net portfolio risk rather than treating each position in isolation. Read more about Spark Prime👇

Spark

15,593 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

A must watch TIME AND PRICE MODEL THE best video you will find on X Explaining time and price model and the psychology (risk management ) With this video you can pass any prop with ease 🔥🔥 #forever_in_wealth
23:42

A must watch TIME AND PRICE MODEL THE best video you will find on X Explaining time and price model and the psychology (risk management ) With this video you can pass any prop with ease 🔥🔥 #forever_in_wealth

FZNATION

685,045 просмотров • 2 лет назад

$BTC (VIDEO) This is an update to help you manage your long position if you have one trying to catch this bounce! I also break down why risk management is so important - nothing impacts my PnL more than disciplined stops and position control. Enjoy, and please like/repost 🙏
3:46

$BTC (VIDEO) This is an update to help you manage your long position if you have one trying to catch this bounce! I also break down why risk management is so important - nothing impacts my PnL more than disciplined stops and position control. Enjoy, and please like/repost 🙏

Wick

24,083 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

A really cool example of Perplexity Deep Research: go through your portfolio, pull up information from the web about recent executive orders, and tell you which companies in your portfolio are impacted with a risk assessment. Something you would be paying a financial advisor 0.x% management fees of your portfolio is now free.
2:57

A really cool example of Perplexity Deep Research: go through your portfolio, pull up information from the web about recent executive orders, and tell you which companies in your portfolio are impacted with a risk assessment. Something you would be paying a financial advisor 0.x% management fees of your portfolio is now free.

Aravind Srinivas

257,193 просмотров • 1 год назад

DR. PAUL THOMAS: “You are MORE likely to die from the VACCINE than from the DISEASE, this is true for EVERY single vaccine on the childhood schedule.” DR. SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: “If mandates were to STOP, these companies would CRASH. And that’s not going to be allowed to happen...” The statistical analysis of each vaccine... The risk of death from Polio is 1 in 1 trillion The risk of death from the Polio vaccine is 1 in 215K The risk of death from Diphtheria is 1 in 42.5 million The risk of death from the Diphtheria vaccine 1 in 76K The risk of death from Tetanus is 1 in 1.5 million The risk of death from the Tetanus Vaccine is 1 in 76K The risk of death from Pertussis is 1 in 2.3 million The risk of death from the Pertussis vaccine is 1 in 76K The risk of death from Measles is 1 in 106.5 million The risk of death from the Measles vaccine is 1 in 108K The risk of death from Mumps is 1 in 40.3 million The risk of death from the Mumps vaccine is 1 in 108K The risk of death from Rubella is 1 in 0/negligible The risk of death from the Rubella vaccine is 1 in 108K The risk of death from Chickenpox is 1 in 32.3 million The risk of death from Chickenpox vaccine is 1 in 202K The risk of death from Hepatitis-A is 1 in 1.6 million The risk of death from the Hep-A vaccine is 1 in 73K The risk of death from Hepatitis-B is 1 in 305K The risk of death from the Hep-B vaccine is 1 in 96K The risk of death from HIB is 1 in 1.5 million The risk of death from the HIB vaccine is 1 in 46K The risk of death from Pneumonia is 1 in 236K The risk of death from Pneumonia vaccine is 1 in 50K The risk of death from Meningitis is 1 in 822K The risk of death from Meningitis vaccine is 1 in 141K The risk of death from Influenza is 1 in 136K The risk of death from the Influenza Vaccine is 1 in 15K
1:22

DR. PAUL THOMAS: “You are MORE likely to die from the VACCINE than from the DISEASE, this is true for EVERY single vaccine on the childhood schedule.” DR. SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: “If mandates were to STOP, these companies would CRASH. And that’s not going to be allowed to happen...” The statistical analysis of each vaccine... The risk of death from Polio is 1 in 1 trillion The risk of death from the Polio vaccine is 1 in 215K The risk of death from Diphtheria is 1 in 42.5 million The risk of death from the Diphtheria vaccine 1 in 76K The risk of death from Tetanus is 1 in 1.5 million The risk of death from the Tetanus Vaccine is 1 in 76K The risk of death from Pertussis is 1 in 2.3 million The risk of death from the Pertussis vaccine is 1 in 76K The risk of death from Measles is 1 in 106.5 million The risk of death from the Measles vaccine is 1 in 108K The risk of death from Mumps is 1 in 40.3 million The risk of death from the Mumps vaccine is 1 in 108K The risk of death from Rubella is 1 in 0/negligible The risk of death from the Rubella vaccine is 1 in 108K The risk of death from Chickenpox is 1 in 32.3 million The risk of death from Chickenpox vaccine is 1 in 202K The risk of death from Hepatitis-A is 1 in 1.6 million The risk of death from the Hep-A vaccine is 1 in 73K The risk of death from Hepatitis-B is 1 in 305K The risk of death from the Hep-B vaccine is 1 in 96K The risk of death from HIB is 1 in 1.5 million The risk of death from the HIB vaccine is 1 in 46K The risk of death from Pneumonia is 1 in 236K The risk of death from Pneumonia vaccine is 1 in 50K The risk of death from Meningitis is 1 in 822K The risk of death from Meningitis vaccine is 1 in 141K The risk of death from Influenza is 1 in 136K The risk of death from the Influenza Vaccine is 1 in 15K

Valerie Anne Smith

188,376 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

I made a real-world AI hedge fund team. It has 4 agents: 1 • market data agent 2 • quant agent 3 • risk manager agent 4 • portfolio manager agent You can run all of my code below. No prior coding experience is required. The agents work sequentially, passing messages to the next agent. 1 • Market Data Agent gathers market data and calculates technical signals. 2 • Quant Agent takes market data and generates a buy, sell, or hold signal. 3 • Risk Management Agent takes trading signal and generates a risk signal. 4 • Portfolio Management Agent considers all signals and makes a final trading decision.
0:27

I made a real-world AI hedge fund team. It has 4 agents: 1 • market data agent 2 • quant agent 3 • risk manager agent 4 • portfolio manager agent You can run all of my code below. No prior coding experience is required. The agents work sequentially, passing messages to the next agent. 1 • Market Data Agent gathers market data and calculates technical signals. 2 • Quant Agent takes market data and generates a buy, sell, or hold signal. 3 • Risk Management Agent takes trading signal and generates a risk signal. 4 • Portfolio Management Agent considers all signals and makes a final trading decision.

Virat Singh

368,480 просмотров • 1 год назад

ex-Citadel portfolio manager, just explained why almost every fund actually blows up. "90% of hedge fund failures, PM failures, analyst failures, it's bad portfolio construction, sizing, all those things." the logic: alpha is competitive. one good idea barely moves the needle, because the moment you build a book, correlation starts eating you. "any amount of correlation in a portfolio drags your sharpe ratio toward the market's." and the market's sharpe you can buy for free from Vanguard. so the entire game collapses to two things: generate a positive hit rate across enough independent bets, and kill the correlation between them. the funds that survive run 80-90% of their risk in idiosyncratic, stock-specific bets. only 10-20% is allowed to be factor exposure. and they treat every factor bet, momentum, crowding, "long the AI trade", like a single stock position, with the same hard limits and the same diligence. the ones who blow up almost always had the ideas. they just leaked P&L on risk they never meant to take. "what they got wrong was risk and portfolio construction." clip from "Odds on Open"
1:32

ex-Citadel portfolio manager, just explained why almost every fund actually blows up. "90% of hedge fund failures, PM failures, analyst failures, it's bad portfolio construction, sizing, all those things." the logic: alpha is competitive. one good idea barely moves the needle, because the moment you build a book, correlation starts eating you. "any amount of correlation in a portfolio drags your sharpe ratio toward the market's." and the market's sharpe you can buy for free from Vanguard. so the entire game collapses to two things: generate a positive hit rate across enough independent bets, and kill the correlation between them. the funds that survive run 80-90% of their risk in idiosyncratic, stock-specific bets. only 10-20% is allowed to be factor exposure. and they treat every factor bet, momentum, crowding, "long the AI trade", like a single stock position, with the same hard limits and the same diligence. the ones who blow up almost always had the ideas. they just leaked P&L on risk they never meant to take. "what they got wrong was risk and portfolio construction." clip from "Odds on Open"

Goshawk Trades

39,360 просмотров • 20 дней назад

Marc Andreessen: the thing startup founders misunderstand about 'risk' "I've always been a fan of what Andy Rachleff taught me, which is called The Onion Theory of Risk. You can think about the startup on Day 1 as having every conceivable kind of risk: founder risk, product risk, technical risk, revenue risk, etc. A startup at the beginning is this long list of risks. Being a founder is a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go."
2:06

Marc Andreessen: the thing startup founders misunderstand about 'risk' "I've always been a fan of what Andy Rachleff taught me, which is called The Onion Theory of Risk. You can think about the startup on Day 1 as having every conceivable kind of risk: founder risk, product risk, technical risk, revenue risk, etc. A startup at the beginning is this long list of risks. Being a founder is a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go."

Overlap: Business & Tech

48,726 просмотров • 1 год назад

This 13-min lecture on "Antifragility" by Nassim Taleb will teach you more about surviving market chaos than 2 years of risk management at BlackRock Save this video & watch it This video will teach you more than any course, then read the article
13:04

This 13-min lecture on "Antifragility" by Nassim Taleb will teach you more about surviving market chaos than 2 years of risk management at BlackRock Save this video & watch it This video will teach you more than any course, then read the article

bodila

63,016 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Amy Adams says that signing on to #Nightbitch was a personal risk more than a professional risk: “I don’t think about the outcome [of the film] a lot of times going in.” | #ActorsOnActors
1:07

Amy Adams says that signing on to #Nightbitch was a personal risk more than a professional risk: “I don’t think about the outcome [of the film] a lot of times going in.” | #ActorsOnActors

Variety

25,268 просмотров • 1 год назад

Good morning! Newest upload out. Theme? "Don't die" Risk management advice you won't commonly hear when the most common advise is "Just risk 1% per trade bro"
14:39

Good morning! Newest upload out. Theme? "Don't die" Risk management advice you won't commonly hear when the most common advise is "Just risk 1% per trade bro"

Horse

17,684 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Qullamaggie mentioned the percentage he typically risked per trade. "2.5% is way too much, you have 6/7 losers in a row and you’re down 20% of your account. You should probably cut it by half. I usually risk around 0.5% on most of my trades. 0.2-0.7%, I rarely risk more than 1%. Sometimes I do, maybe a few times per week, if that. Depends on the market conditions, the past two weeks there’s been so many opps, and I’ve been pretty aggressive. I’ve had a lot of 1% type of trades where I risk 1% or even more. Like when I took APT, I took several 1% losses before I nailed it on the short side, I took like 3/4 1% losses on it, but then I nailed it and I made it back and then some."
1:26

Qullamaggie mentioned the percentage he typically risked per trade. "2.5% is way too much, you have 6/7 losers in a row and you’re down 20% of your account. You should probably cut it by half. I usually risk around 0.5% on most of my trades. 0.2-0.7%, I rarely risk more than 1%. Sometimes I do, maybe a few times per week, if that. Depends on the market conditions, the past two weeks there’s been so many opps, and I’ve been pretty aggressive. I’ve had a lot of 1% type of trades where I risk 1% or even more. Like when I took APT, I took several 1% losses before I nailed it on the short side, I took like 3/4 1% losses on it, but then I nailed it and I made it back and then some."

Will Hu

15,993 просмотров • 1 год назад