正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

ex-Citadel portfolio manager, just explained why almost every fund actually blows up. "90% of hedge fund failures, PM failures, analyst failures, it's bad portfolio construction, sizing, all those things." the logic: alpha is competitive. one good idea barely moves the needle, because the moment you build a book, correlation...

39,792 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

9 条评论

Ahmad Alhusaini 的头像
Ahmad Alhusaini4 个月前

This is why a portfolio can look diversified and still be one trade. Ten positions tied to the same factor, liquidity regime, or macro outcome are not ten independent bets. The real skill is knowing what risk you actually own.

Simeon Vanov 的头像
Simeon Vanov4 个月前

'Alpha is competitive' is the line doing the real work there. A thin, uncertain edge is exactly the one you can't size big, and that's why construction ends up outweighing the idea. If an edge were huge and certain you'd just concentrate and sizing would barely matter. It's the edge staying competitive that forces the discipline. The retail version runs backwards. A setup looks clean so it gets more size, when a thin edge is the one that should stay smallest. How good a trade looks to me has never been what made it pay, so I stopped letting that feeling touch the size.

Alpha I̶n̶v̶e̶s̶t̶o̶r̶s̶ Borsuk 的头像
Alpha I̶n̶v̶e̶s̶t̶o̶r̶s̶ Borsuk4 个月前

@richfalkwallace Utter bollix…. Almost every fund blows up hahaha … nonsense… and his reasons lol… PMs can blow up because they are call options and call options often go to zero… most HF PMs now sit in pods and run v v narrow strategies their incentive is take as much risk as allowed

Wainaina🇰🇪 的头像
Wainaina🇰🇪4 个月前

🤔🤔🤔🤔

' 的头像
'4 个月前

Ure such a tard dawg

MoMaMe 的头像
MoMaMe4 个月前

underrated take. everyone chases alpha and ignores that construction and sizing are what actually keep you alive

Villain 的头像
Villain4 个月前

Bad portfolio construction kills alpha faster than bad stock picks. Concentration, correlation, and overleveraged sizing are the silent killers. Most funds don't blow up from wrong calls — they blow up from poor construction.

Jim Osman 的头像
Jim Osman4 个月前

Position sizing matters as much as stock picking.

STRINGER 的头像
STRINGER4 个月前

Sizing is where the blowups actually live, not idea generation. We cap single-trade loss against a daily limit before the trade is even allowed.

相关视频

Ex-Citadel PM Rich Falk-Wallace (Rich Falk-Wallace) on why 90% of hedge fund blowups are portfolio construction — not bad ideas. Rich Falk-Wallace (PM @ Citadel | Viking Global | Silver Point | Now founder & CEO of Arcana Arcana — risk & portfolio software used by ~7 of the 10 largest multi-manager hedge funds) "When they blow up, the story is never 'Shucks, I actually am not as brilliant as I was before.' What they got wrong was risk, portfolio construction." We cover: - Why 90% of PM failures come from sizing & portfolio construction, not thesis quality - The only two ways to survive long-term: extreme hit rate/slugging, or managing ex-ante correlation - The math of 10 pods long the same trade: factor bets compound, idio bets diversify - Why LTCM is the classic backward-looking correlation failure — and why ex-ante is the whole job - The paradox: "pure fundamental" concentrated funds take the biggest factor bets (up to 80% R²) - Why the best PMs treat every factor exposure like a stock position — same limits, same diligence - Sharpe ratio as a t-statistic against the null hypothesis that you have no skill - The tiger cub who moved to a pod seat and said it felt like playing a video game - Are junior analysts screwed? Dispersion, not extinction - His contrarian take: capital is opening up beyond the Big Four via SMAs Highlights: (00:00) Intro (01:10) The real job of a hedge fund PM: a product sold to allocators (02:52) The 90% failure vector: risk leakage, not bad theses (10:25) Two ways out: hit rate/slugging vs. managing correlations (18:17) Factor bets compound, idio diversifies: why 80% idio becomes 60% at scale (27:33) Factor models as the "perfect benchmark" for every stock at every moment (38:57) The old-school PM who calls factors bullshit — Rich's answer (44:48) Treat factors like stock positions: limits, diligence, sizing (55:29) Why concentrated "pure fundamental" books take the biggest factor bets (01:05:34) Are junior analysts screwed? AI, mock books, & dispersion (01:15:52) Contrarian take: SMA capital opening up beyond the Big Four (01:19:42) The #1 new-launch killer: trying to do too many things at once

Ethan Kho

531,271 次观看 • 4 个月前

Harry Markowitz, the Nobel laureate who invented modern portfolio theory: "Every fund from Bridgewater to Citadel runs on one equation I wrote as a 25-year-old grad student. Wall Street pays quants $500K to use it. It's free." the thread above teaches you to build a portfolio the real way, with the mathematics of capital allocation. every line of it traces back to one paper markowitz wrote in 1952. before him, "don't put all your eggs in one basket" was folklore. he turned it into algebra. he proved a portfolio's risk isn't the average of its parts, it's driven by how the parts move together, the covariance. combine assets that don't move in lockstep and you cut risk without giving up return. that is the closest thing to a free lunch in all of finance, and he wrote the exact equation for how much of it you get. that single insight, mean-variance optimization, is the engine under every serious fund on earth. renaissance, bridgewater, citadel, your pension, all of them size risk with markowitz's math. he published it in 1952, won the nobel in 1990, and it sits in every textbook and this free lecture. same story i keep telling: the math that runs the trillion-dollar machine has been public and free for seventy years. here is the part markowitz himself warned about. the equation is only as good as the numbers you feed it, your estimates of return and covariance. feed it garbage and the "optimal" portfolio it hands back is confidently, precisely wrong, and it detonates in the exact crisis it was built to survive. the optimizer is free. estimating the future honestly, and knowing when to distrust your own inputs, is the entire job.

Rossst.03

44,259 次观看 • 3 个月前