Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

A small group of quants wrote one formula, launched it on Polymarket and quietly took $20m in a year Their secret fits in one equation: A = e^(-λ₁T - λ₂y - λ₃R) · (1 + γ₀y · 1_{y>0.7}) · e^(-φ₀R²) · sgn(σₕ - κC)(1-C) These aren't random symbols each...

sopersone's profile picture

sopersone

4,096 subscribers

57,212 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & TeknolojiFinans
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

CITADEL QUANTS HIDE THE GAME BEHIND A FORMULA WITH TEN TERMS, PREDICTION MARKETS RUN ON EXACTLY ONE The secret is one line. Edge = P(model) − P(market) That Z-field monster on screen is a stack of simple signals wearing a costume. A prediction market strips all of it down to one number, the crowd's guess at a probability. In plain words. If you can turn fresh news into a probability before the crowd reprices, the gap between your number and their price is the whole edge. That is why the game is not IQ, it is speed to a number. An AI that reads live news does in ninety seconds what the tab takes hours to price in. I broke down the four exact prompts that turn Grok into a probability desk, the sizing rules and the ten minute daily routine in the article. Still bets, not a salary, so size like it & the full playbook is in the article. Read it ↓
0:46

CITADEL QUANTS HIDE THE GAME BEHIND A FORMULA WITH TEN TERMS, PREDICTION MARKETS RUN ON EXACTLY ONE The secret is one line. Edge = P(model) − P(market) That Z-field monster on screen is a stack of simple signals wearing a costume. A prediction market strips all of it down to one number, the crowd's guess at a probability. In plain words. If you can turn fresh news into a probability before the crowd reprices, the gap between your number and their price is the whole edge. That is why the game is not IQ, it is speed to a number. An AI that reads live news does in ninety seconds what the tab takes hours to price in. I broke down the four exact prompts that turn Grok into a probability desk, the sizing rules and the ten minute daily routine in the article. Still bets, not a salary, so size like it & the full playbook is in the article. Read it ↓

slash1s

15,977 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

This guy makes +1% on EVERY TRADE he opens Sounds small? Now repeat this 50 times per day Now you make $30k / month with NO RISK > $9 starting balance > $139,000 total profit > Weather markets only I don't blame you if you don't believe it But 7,300 predictions later the math doesn't lie This wallet found the safest daily printer on Polymarket and just never stopped Temperature forecasts at 95-99¢ Near certain outcomes Small gap to $1.00 collected at resolution Repeat 7,300 times $1,450 landing every single day like a salary Except nobody is taxing it and there's no boss involved His wallet: Now here's the part that should genuinely frustrate you $1,450 daily is what he makes leaving parlay money on the table every single day Same trades through @Poly_Parlay: > 5 confirmed forecasts at 96¢ combined into one parlay = 1.22x payout in one shot > Add 2 mispriced entries at 20¢ into the same position = 10x multiplier > $1,450 daily becomes $14,500 without changing a single market he already trades > Same weather data > Same 95-99¢ entries > Same near zero risk profile Just structured to compound instead of add up He turned $9 into $139k grinding one trade at a time Parlay version of that same journey ends at a completely different number Parlay bot access: This is the only tool that let's you combine different markets into one position and as a result win MORE Just because parlay mechanism works this way > $1,450 per day is the floor > $14,500 is what parlay makes it
0:29

This guy makes +1% on EVERY TRADE he opens Sounds small? Now repeat this 50 times per day Now you make $30k / month with NO RISK > $9 starting balance > $139,000 total profit > Weather markets only I don't blame you if you don't believe it But 7,300 predictions later the math doesn't lie This wallet found the safest daily printer on Polymarket and just never stopped Temperature forecasts at 95-99¢ Near certain outcomes Small gap to $1.00 collected at resolution Repeat 7,300 times $1,450 landing every single day like a salary Except nobody is taxing it and there's no boss involved His wallet: Now here's the part that should genuinely frustrate you $1,450 daily is what he makes leaving parlay money on the table every single day Same trades through @Poly_Parlay: > 5 confirmed forecasts at 96¢ combined into one parlay = 1.22x payout in one shot > Add 2 mispriced entries at 20¢ into the same position = 10x multiplier > $1,450 daily becomes $14,500 without changing a single market he already trades > Same weather data > Same 95-99¢ entries > Same near zero risk profile Just structured to compound instead of add up He turned $9 into $139k grinding one trade at a time Parlay version of that same journey ends at a completely different number Parlay bot access: This is the only tool that let's you combine different markets into one position and as a result win MORE Just because parlay mechanism works this way > $1,450 per day is the floor > $14,500 is what parlay makes it

magsimich

11,615 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

This trader used Claude to build a Quant Bot and made +$130,992 on Polymarket 29,721 predictions in 132 days with a 50% win rate How is this account bringing in about $992 per day? The logic is simple: 1. It focuses on short crypto “Up / Down” markets, averaging roughly 9 trades per hour 2. Instead of relying on one entry, the bot appears to build its position gradually as the probabilities change throughout each window 3. It can take exposure on one outcome first, then wait for a favorable move before adding the opposite side and locking part of the position into a hedge This trader’s Polymarket account: nagi777 Most profitable trades: $54 → $1,165 (+$1,111 +2,077.2%) $28 → $1,127 (+$1,100 +3,961.7%) $234 → $1,311 (+$1,077 +459.8%) A 50% win rate is enough for this system because the result depends on how each position is constructed and modified over time, not simply on finishing more markets on the winning side
0:25

This trader used Claude to build a Quant Bot and made +$130,992 on Polymarket 29,721 predictions in 132 days with a 50% win rate How is this account bringing in about $992 per day? The logic is simple: 1. It focuses on short crypto “Up / Down” markets, averaging roughly 9 trades per hour 2. Instead of relying on one entry, the bot appears to build its position gradually as the probabilities change throughout each window 3. It can take exposure on one outcome first, then wait for a favorable move before adding the opposite side and locking part of the position into a hedge This trader’s Polymarket account: nagi777 Most profitable trades: $54 → $1,165 (+$1,111 +2,077.2%) $28 → $1,127 (+$1,100 +3,961.7%) $234 → $1,311 (+$1,077 +459.8%) A 50% win rate is enough for this system because the result depends on how each position is constructed and modified over time, not simply on finishing more markets on the winning side

Daniro

53,229 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

I think this is one of the best automated trading bots on Polymarket since March 2026 it has made over 101,702 predictions trades exclusively on Bitcoin Up/Down markets. Total profit: $190,392 best trade: $216 → $1,709 this is one of the most consistent automated traders I've seen on Polymarket pofile:
0:20

I think this is one of the best automated trading bots on Polymarket since March 2026 it has made over 101,702 predictions trades exclusively on Bitcoin Up/Down markets. Total profit: $190,392 best trade: $216 → $1,709 this is one of the most consistent automated traders I've seen on Polymarket pofile:

sopersone

11,024 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

IIT, chalkboard, zero slides A 22-year-old at IMC gets paid $500,000 in year one for exactly one skill. Not picking winners. Seeing every trade as a full spread of outcomes, each one with its own odds attached. Her name is Prabha Sharma. She teaches this exact skill on a bare chalkboard, for free, in a lecture almost nobody outside that room has ever watched. Most people see a trade as a coin flip. Win or lose. Nothing else. You already think this way about your own trades, don't you. That's the mistake. A trade is never just win or lose. It's a spread of outcomes, each with its own odds and its own payoff attached before a single dollar moves. The formula for this is called the binomial distribution, and it's far simpler than it sounds. Here it is: P(X = k) = C(n,k) × p^k × (1-p)^(n-k) n = how many bets you take p = your real win probability on each one k = how many of them you actually want to win Try it yourself right now. Say you have a genuine 55% edge (p = 0.55) and you take 10 trades (n = 10). What's the actual chance you win at least 6 of them? Plug in k = 6: P(X=6) = C(10,6) × 0.55^6 × 0.45^4 ≈ 23.8% Add that up across every value of k from 6 to 10, and your real odds of winning at least 6 out of 10 land around 47%. Just under a coin flip, with a genuine edge in your favor. Sit with that for a second. A 55% edge does not feel like 55% once you actually run the math over a small number of trades. This is the exact formula that decides how much to risk on any single bet, once you actually know your edge. Sharma builds the whole thing from zero, in notation simple enough for a complete beginner to follow every step. Wall Street pays $500,000 a year for this one skill. An IIT professor already gave the entire thing away, for free, on a blackboard nobody bothered to watch.
47:17

IIT, chalkboard, zero slides A 22-year-old at IMC gets paid $500,000 in year one for exactly one skill. Not picking winners. Seeing every trade as a full spread of outcomes, each one with its own odds attached. Her name is Prabha Sharma. She teaches this exact skill on a bare chalkboard, for free, in a lecture almost nobody outside that room has ever watched. Most people see a trade as a coin flip. Win or lose. Nothing else. You already think this way about your own trades, don't you. That's the mistake. A trade is never just win or lose. It's a spread of outcomes, each with its own odds and its own payoff attached before a single dollar moves. The formula for this is called the binomial distribution, and it's far simpler than it sounds. Here it is: P(X = k) = C(n,k) × p^k × (1-p)^(n-k) n = how many bets you take p = your real win probability on each one k = how many of them you actually want to win Try it yourself right now. Say you have a genuine 55% edge (p = 0.55) and you take 10 trades (n = 10). What's the actual chance you win at least 6 of them? Plug in k = 6: P(X=6) = C(10,6) × 0.55^6 × 0.45^4 ≈ 23.8% Add that up across every value of k from 6 to 10, and your real odds of winning at least 6 out of 10 land around 47%. Just under a coin flip, with a genuine edge in your favor. Sit with that for a second. A 55% edge does not feel like 55% once you actually run the math over a small number of trades. This is the exact formula that decides how much to risk on any single bet, once you actually know your edge. Sharma builds the whole thing from zero, in notation simple enough for a complete beginner to follow every step. Wall Street pays $500,000 a year for this one skill. An IIT professor already gave the entire thing away, for free, on a blackboard nobody bothered to watch.

Radha Tripathi

36,733 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

The best Polymarket Quant bot for copy trading with a 99.3% win rate The bot doesn't take risks it uses math and statistics to consistently achieve a 99% win probability. Using this approach, it has earned +$805,000 across 29,184 predictions with 99.3% accuracy Here's a breakdown of its algorithm: 1. Price Mispricing Detection δ = actual win probability − implied probability Traders constantly overpay for cheap contracts (0.1–50¢), but the main edge is concentrated in contracts (80–99¢) that's exactly where the bot trades 2. Expected Value (EV) Calculation EV = (P_win × Payout) − (P_loss × Cost) Shows whether a bet is worth placing regardless of the outcome of any single trade 3. Kelly Criterion f* = (p × b − q) / b The most powerful position sizing formula ever discovered for trading and prediction markets Tells the algorithm what percentage of your portfolio to put into each bet to win in the long run His profile: Those who copy traded him have already made $35,000 But those who followed him and used Poly_Parlay made over $100,000 How? By simply mirroring his trades with a multiplier Instead of opening single trades, they added them all to a basket, so the odds multiplied Bot access:
0:28

The best Polymarket Quant bot for copy trading with a 99.3% win rate The bot doesn't take risks it uses math and statistics to consistently achieve a 99% win probability. Using this approach, it has earned +$805,000 across 29,184 predictions with 99.3% accuracy Here's a breakdown of its algorithm: 1. Price Mispricing Detection δ = actual win probability − implied probability Traders constantly overpay for cheap contracts (0.1–50¢), but the main edge is concentrated in contracts (80–99¢) that's exactly where the bot trades 2. Expected Value (EV) Calculation EV = (P_win × Payout) − (P_loss × Cost) Shows whether a bet is worth placing regardless of the outcome of any single trade 3. Kelly Criterion f* = (p × b − q) / b The most powerful position sizing formula ever discovered for trading and prediction markets Tells the algorithm what percentage of your portfolio to put into each bet to win in the long run His profile: Those who copy traded him have already made $35,000 But those who followed him and used Poly_Parlay made over $100,000 How? By simply mirroring his trades with a multiplier Instead of opening single trades, they added them all to a basket, so the odds multiplied Bot access:

sopersone

15,814 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

IIT, chalkboard, zero slides A 22-year-old at IMC gets paid $500,000 in year one for exactly one skill. Not picking winners. Seeing every trade as a full spread of outcomes, each one with its own odds attached. Her name is Prabha Sharma. She teaches this exact skill on a bare chalkboard, for free, in a lecture almost nobody outside that room has ever watched. Most people see a trade as a coin flip. Win or lose. Nothing else. You already think this way about your own trades, don't you. That's the mistake. A trade is never just win or lose. It's a spread of outcomes, each with its own odds and its own payoff attached before a single dollar moves. The formula for this is called the binomial distribution, and it's far simpler than it sounds. Here it is: P(X = k) = C(n,k) × p^k × (1-p)^(n-k) n = how many bets you take p = your real win probability on each one k = how many of them you actually want to win Try it yourself right now. Say you have a genuine 55% edge (p = 0.55) and you take 10 trades (n = 10). What's the actual chance you win at least 6 of them? Plug in k = 6: P(X=6) = C(10,6) × 0.55^6 × 0.45^4 ≈ 23.8% Add that up across every value of k from 6 to 10, and your real odds of winning at least 6 out of 10 land around 47%. Just under a coin flip, with a genuine edge in your favor. Sit with that for a second. A 55% edge does not feel like 55% once you actually run the math over a small number of trades. This is the exact formula that decides how much to risk on any single bet, once you actually know your edge. Sharma builds the whole thing from zero, in notation simple enough for a complete beginner to follow every step. Wall Street pays $500,000 a year for this one skill. An IIT professor already gave the entire thing away, for free, on a blackboard nobody bothered to watch.
47:17

IIT, chalkboard, zero slides A 22-year-old at IMC gets paid $500,000 in year one for exactly one skill. Not picking winners. Seeing every trade as a full spread of outcomes, each one with its own odds attached. Her name is Prabha Sharma. She teaches this exact skill on a bare chalkboard, for free, in a lecture almost nobody outside that room has ever watched. Most people see a trade as a coin flip. Win or lose. Nothing else. You already think this way about your own trades, don't you. That's the mistake. A trade is never just win or lose. It's a spread of outcomes, each with its own odds and its own payoff attached before a single dollar moves. The formula for this is called the binomial distribution, and it's far simpler than it sounds. Here it is: P(X = k) = C(n,k) × p^k × (1-p)^(n-k) n = how many bets you take p = your real win probability on each one k = how many of them you actually want to win Try it yourself right now. Say you have a genuine 55% edge (p = 0.55) and you take 10 trades (n = 10). What's the actual chance you win at least 6 of them? Plug in k = 6: P(X=6) = C(10,6) × 0.55^6 × 0.45^4 ≈ 23.8% Add that up across every value of k from 6 to 10, and your real odds of winning at least 6 out of 10 land around 47%. Just under a coin flip, with a genuine edge in your favor. Sit with that for a second. A 55% edge does not feel like 55% once you actually run the math over a small number of trades. This is the exact formula that decides how much to risk on any single bet, once you actually know your edge. Sharma builds the whole thing from zero, in notation simple enough for a complete beginner to follow every step. Wall Street pays $500,000 a year for this one skill. An IIT professor already gave the entire thing away, for free, on a blackboard nobody bothered to watch.

Kshitij Mishra | AI & Tech

46,925 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

There's a way to win on Polymarket no matter who wins. Buy YES in one place, NO in another. If they don't add up to a dollar, you locked a profit. Before the event even happens. Here's how the arbitrage actually works and how to master it: This is the closest thing to free money on Polymarket. Every market has a YES and a NO. One of them MUST resolve to $1. The other goes to zero. So in theory, YES + NO should always cost exactly $1. But in thin or messy markets, they don't. Sometimes you can buy: > YES at 0.48 > NO at 0.49 > total cost: 0.97 This guy does it every day: [ He also uploaded a full guide on how to build the same bot. One side pays you $1 at resolution no matter what. He spends 97 cents to guarantee a dollar. That 3 cents is locked, risk-free. There's also the cross-market version. The same event sometimes has two separate markets at different prices. Buy the cheap YES in one, the cheap NO in the other, and pocket the gap. Sounds easy, right? But here's the honest part: These gaps close in about 2.7 seconds now. By the time you click by hand, a bot already took it. So the manual version only really survives in low-liquidity markets the bots ignore. The fast version? That lives in compiled code with a VPS sitting next to the exchange. If you can code, this is one of the cleanest edges i know. If you can't, stick to the thin markets where speed matters less. Good luck!
0:40

There's a way to win on Polymarket no matter who wins. Buy YES in one place, NO in another. If they don't add up to a dollar, you locked a profit. Before the event even happens. Here's how the arbitrage actually works and how to master it: This is the closest thing to free money on Polymarket. Every market has a YES and a NO. One of them MUST resolve to $1. The other goes to zero. So in theory, YES + NO should always cost exactly $1. But in thin or messy markets, they don't. Sometimes you can buy: > YES at 0.48 > NO at 0.49 > total cost: 0.97 This guy does it every day: [ He also uploaded a full guide on how to build the same bot. One side pays you $1 at resolution no matter what. He spends 97 cents to guarantee a dollar. That 3 cents is locked, risk-free. There's also the cross-market version. The same event sometimes has two separate markets at different prices. Buy the cheap YES in one, the cheap NO in the other, and pocket the gap. Sounds easy, right? But here's the honest part: These gaps close in about 2.7 seconds now. By the time you click by hand, a bot already took it. So the manual version only really survives in low-liquidity markets the bots ignore. The fast version? That lives in compiled code with a VPS sitting next to the exchange. If you can code, this is one of the cleanest edges i know. If you can't, stick to the thin markets where speed matters less. Good luck!

Dexter's Lab

11,583 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

He built a trading bot on Polymarket with Claude Result: +$66,295 in 1 month His bot trades short-term crypto Up/Down markets using a strategy with 4 core elements: 1. Right after a market opens, it calculates the probability of Up and Down 2. If its own estimate differs from the price on Polymarket, it buys the undervalued outcome 3. When the move is confirmed, it increases the position, even if the price has become more expensive 4. If the signal changes, it starts buying the opposite side as a hedge or to flip the position His Polymarket username: uninformedfloww He captures a consistent edge through a large number of trades with positive expected value That’s how he made +$66k in one month
0:28

He built a trading bot on Polymarket with Claude Result: +$66,295 in 1 month His bot trades short-term crypto Up/Down markets using a strategy with 4 core elements: 1. Right after a market opens, it calculates the probability of Up and Down 2. If its own estimate differs from the price on Polymarket, it buys the undervalued outcome 3. When the move is confirmed, it increases the position, even if the price has become more expensive 4. If the signal changes, it starts buying the opposite side as a hedge or to flip the position His Polymarket username: uninformedfloww He captures a consistent edge through a large number of trades with positive expected value That’s how he made +$66k in one month

VALIX

15,778 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

I asked Claude Fable 5 (Extra High) to build an arb bot for Polymarket. One rule: trade only when YES + NO in 2 hours it almost doubled it (+$96.31) > in 5 hours it showed +$579 PnL > current balance: +$3,799.73 Cost: 10M tokens. Here's how it works and why: Every BTC Up/Down market on Polymarket has exactly two outcomes. YES and NO. When the market resolves, one pays $1. The other pays $0. That means owning BOTH sides should always cost exactly $1. But markets aren't perfect. Sometimes YES trades at $0.48 while NO trades at $0.49. Together that's only $0.97 so the bot instantly buys both. A position worth $1... for just $0.97. And Claude knows it, this is the simplest arb that exists. You can paste this to it and use this logic in your prompt. This $0.03 difference is locked in regardless of whether Bitcoin pumps, dumps, or goes sideways. No prediction required. And difficult part isn't finding the opportunity, it's execution. These pricing gaps usually disappear in seconds. If one order fills but the other doesn't, the trade can become a loss. So my bot constantly scans every BTC market, checks fees, validates liquidity, places both orders almost simultaneously and skips what isn't worth the risk. It's less like trading and more like catching tiny accounting mistakes before everyone else notices them. Funny enoughh, the hardest part was not writing arb logic. It was making the execution reliable enough that free money actually stayed free. This completely changed how I think about trading. What's the point of it if you can just fill mispriced BTC markets?? Automatically. The biggest edge is getting AI to execute simple ideas faster and more consistently than any human ever could. Shared the exact build in my last article, leaving it below. Good luck!
0:41

I asked Claude Fable 5 (Extra High) to build an arb bot for Polymarket. One rule: trade only when YES + NO in 2 hours it almost doubled it (+$96.31) > in 5 hours it showed +$579 PnL > current balance: +$3,799.73 Cost: 10M tokens. Here's how it works and why: Every BTC Up/Down market on Polymarket has exactly two outcomes. YES and NO. When the market resolves, one pays $1. The other pays $0. That means owning BOTH sides should always cost exactly $1. But markets aren't perfect. Sometimes YES trades at $0.48 while NO trades at $0.49. Together that's only $0.97 so the bot instantly buys both. A position worth $1... for just $0.97. And Claude knows it, this is the simplest arb that exists. You can paste this to it and use this logic in your prompt. This $0.03 difference is locked in regardless of whether Bitcoin pumps, dumps, or goes sideways. No prediction required. And difficult part isn't finding the opportunity, it's execution. These pricing gaps usually disappear in seconds. If one order fills but the other doesn't, the trade can become a loss. So my bot constantly scans every BTC market, checks fees, validates liquidity, places both orders almost simultaneously and skips what isn't worth the risk. It's less like trading and more like catching tiny accounting mistakes before everyone else notices them. Funny enoughh, the hardest part was not writing arb logic. It was making the execution reliable enough that free money actually stayed free. This completely changed how I think about trading. What's the point of it if you can just fill mispriced BTC markets?? Automatically. The biggest edge is getting AI to execute simple ideas faster and more consistently than any human ever could. Shared the exact build in my last article, leaving it below. Good luck!

Oracle Boar

155,656 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

I asked Claude Fable 5 (Extra High) to build an arb bot for Polymarket. One rule: trade only when YES + NO in 2 hours it almost doubled it (+$98.40) > in 5 hours it showed +$493 PnL > current balance: +$3,279.73 Cost: 7.5M tokens. Here's how it works and why: Every BTC Up/Down market on Polymarket has exactly two outcomes. YES and NO. When the market resolves, one pays $1. The other pays $0. That means owning BOTH sides should always cost exactly $1. But markets aren't perfect. Sometimes YES trades at $0.48 while NO trades at $0.49. Together that's only $0.97 so the bot instantly buys both. A position worth $1... for just $0.97. And Claude knows it, this is the simplest arb that exists. You can paste this to it and use this logic in your prompt. This $0.03 difference is locked in regardless of whether Bitcoin pumps, dumps, or goes sideways. No prediction required. And difficult part isn't finding the opportunity, it's execution. These pricing gaps usually disappear in seconds. If one order fills but the other doesn't, the trade can become a loss. So my bot constantly scans every BTC market, checks fees, validates liquidity, places both orders almost simultaneously and skips what isn't worth the risk. It's less like trading and more like catching tiny accounting mistakes before everyone else notices them. Funny enoughh, the hardest part was not writing arb logic. It was making the execution reliable enough that free money actually stayed free. This completely changed how I think about trading. What's the point of it if you can just fill mispriced BTC markets?? Automatically. The biggest edge is getting AI to execute simple ideas faster and more consistently than any human ever could. Shared the exact build in my last article, leaving it below.
0:39

I asked Claude Fable 5 (Extra High) to build an arb bot for Polymarket. One rule: trade only when YES + NO in 2 hours it almost doubled it (+$98.40) > in 5 hours it showed +$493 PnL > current balance: +$3,279.73 Cost: 7.5M tokens. Here's how it works and why: Every BTC Up/Down market on Polymarket has exactly two outcomes. YES and NO. When the market resolves, one pays $1. The other pays $0. That means owning BOTH sides should always cost exactly $1. But markets aren't perfect. Sometimes YES trades at $0.48 while NO trades at $0.49. Together that's only $0.97 so the bot instantly buys both. A position worth $1... for just $0.97. And Claude knows it, this is the simplest arb that exists. You can paste this to it and use this logic in your prompt. This $0.03 difference is locked in regardless of whether Bitcoin pumps, dumps, or goes sideways. No prediction required. And difficult part isn't finding the opportunity, it's execution. These pricing gaps usually disappear in seconds. If one order fills but the other doesn't, the trade can become a loss. So my bot constantly scans every BTC market, checks fees, validates liquidity, places both orders almost simultaneously and skips what isn't worth the risk. It's less like trading and more like catching tiny accounting mistakes before everyone else notices them. Funny enoughh, the hardest part was not writing arb logic. It was making the execution reliable enough that free money actually stayed free. This completely changed how I think about trading. What's the point of it if you can just fill mispriced BTC markets?? Automatically. The biggest edge is getting AI to execute simple ideas faster and more consistently than any human ever could. Shared the exact build in my last article, leaving it below.

Oracle Boar

78,827 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

This guy built a trading bot on Polymarket and made +$295,910 His bot trades 5 and 15 minute crypto Up/Down markets using a late-resolution strategy, where most of the position size is deployed when the outcome is getting close to final: 1. It starts with a small directional position At the beginning of each market, it records the reference price and tracks Chainlink TWAP along with external spot/perp feeds During the early stage, it builds a small position. This acts like a probe while the model’s confidence is still relatively low 2. It increases the position as the outcome gets closer to certainty The algorithm constantly recalculates probability. As resolution gets closer, it can estimate more accurately whether the result can still change 3. If the signal changes, it buys the opposite side In 88.2% of markets, it trades only one outcome. In 11.8% of cases, it buys both Up and Down. The opposite side works as a hedge His Polymarket nickname: BoneOhio Follow this account and trade on Polymarket through this app: The main edge of this guy’s HFT algorithm appears during the final minutes of the market. It estimates how close the outcome is to being locked in and concentrates most of its position size where the model sees mispricing
0:25

This guy built a trading bot on Polymarket and made +$295,910 His bot trades 5 and 15 minute crypto Up/Down markets using a late-resolution strategy, where most of the position size is deployed when the outcome is getting close to final: 1. It starts with a small directional position At the beginning of each market, it records the reference price and tracks Chainlink TWAP along with external spot/perp feeds During the early stage, it builds a small position. This acts like a probe while the model’s confidence is still relatively low 2. It increases the position as the outcome gets closer to certainty The algorithm constantly recalculates probability. As resolution gets closer, it can estimate more accurately whether the result can still change 3. If the signal changes, it buys the opposite side In 88.2% of markets, it trades only one outcome. In 11.8% of cases, it buys both Up and Down. The opposite side works as a hedge His Polymarket nickname: BoneOhio Follow this account and trade on Polymarket through this app: The main edge of this guy’s HFT algorithm appears during the final minutes of the market. It estimates how close the outcome is to being locked in and concentrates most of its position size where the model sees mispricing

VALIX

95,756 görüntüleme • 27 gün önce

In 2008 a Stanford professor stood at a podium and proved, for free, that information and money grow by the exact same equation. it was filmed. it has been free for 18 years. 7,000 people watched it. Thomas Cover died four years later and took the fame with him. his life's work: Shannon's information theory and Kelly's betting formula are one thing. how much to bet is just how much you know. every quant sizing a trade in 2026 is standing on Cover, whether they know the name or not. he wrote the book every information theorist trains on. the lecture that ties it all to money sits on YouTube with fewer views than a cat clip. skip to where he turns a horse race into a stock market. same math. a bit of information, a fraction of your bankroll, one growth rate. no fund. no signal. one professor and one equation. a quant I know says this hour is the missing chapter behind every book on position sizing he owns. you are 18 years late. it is still free.
57:26

In 2008 a Stanford professor stood at a podium and proved, for free, that information and money grow by the exact same equation. it was filmed. it has been free for 18 years. 7,000 people watched it. Thomas Cover died four years later and took the fame with him. his life's work: Shannon's information theory and Kelly's betting formula are one thing. how much to bet is just how much you know. every quant sizing a trade in 2026 is standing on Cover, whether they know the name or not. he wrote the book every information theorist trains on. the lecture that ties it all to money sits on YouTube with fewer views than a cat clip. skip to where he turns a horse race into a stock market. same math. a bit of information, a fraction of your bankroll, one growth rate. no fund. no signal. one professor and one equation. a quant I know says this hour is the missing chapter behind every book on position sizing he owns. you are 18 years late. it is still free.

Loran

33,982 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

i can’t believe this cheat-code is legal on Polymarket! $6,000 to $1,000,000 in one month! profile: some regular guy made a cheat bot that trades BTC 15 min every trade makes pretty good profit starting with $6K turned into $1,000,000 and the number keeps growing every day if you know how to write bots like this, there’s only one question what are you still doing at your day job?
0:28

i can’t believe this cheat-code is legal on Polymarket! $6,000 to $1,000,000 in one month! profile: some regular guy made a cheat bot that trades BTC 15 min every trade makes pretty good profit starting with $6K turned into $1,000,000 and the number keeps growing every day if you know how to write bots like this, there’s only one question what are you still doing at your day job?

Goaty

10,340 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

This trader used Claude to build a Quant Bot and made +$125,724 on Polymarket 14,282 predictions in 96 days with a 52% win rate How is this account bringing in about $1,310 per day? The logic is simple: 1. It runs across short crypto “Up / Down” markets at roughly 6 trades per hour 2. The bot appears to keep recalculating which outcome offers the stronger opportunity instead of treating the opening position as final 3. It can take one side first and wait for the probabilities to move before introducing the opposite outcome, giving it a chance to hedge at a more favorable moment This trader’s Polymarket account: takerner Follow this account and trade on Polymarket through this bot: Most profitable trades: $1,085 → $2,370 (+$1,285 +118.4%) $828 → $2,100 (+$1,271 +153.5%) $534 → $1,750 (+$1,216 +227.5%) The account doesn’t need an extreme win rate to stay profitable. The advantage appears to come from repeatedly changing the position as probabilities move instead of relying on a single entry
0:25

This trader used Claude to build a Quant Bot and made +$125,724 on Polymarket 14,282 predictions in 96 days with a 52% win rate How is this account bringing in about $1,310 per day? The logic is simple: 1. It runs across short crypto “Up / Down” markets at roughly 6 trades per hour 2. The bot appears to keep recalculating which outcome offers the stronger opportunity instead of treating the opening position as final 3. It can take one side first and wait for the probabilities to move before introducing the opposite outcome, giving it a chance to hedge at a more favorable moment This trader’s Polymarket account: takerner Follow this account and trade on Polymarket through this bot: Most profitable trades: $1,085 → $2,370 (+$1,285 +118.4%) $828 → $2,100 (+$1,271 +153.5%) $534 → $1,750 (+$1,216 +227.5%) The account doesn’t need an extreme win rate to stay profitable. The advantage appears to come from repeatedly changing the position as probabilities move instead of relying on a single entry

Daniro

50,712 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

How to Turn $15k into $529k in 15 Days A Clawdbot scaled a deposit up to $529k By trading 5-min and 15-min markets on Polymarket > the bot buys YES and NO simultaneously > If their combined price is below $1, making 4% profit instantly > 9,866 trades > 83.9% win rate > +$529k profit Check this profile here: If you wish to do the same I have outlined exactly how to create your own bot in my article Which is also where I told the story of an account making $101k in 48 hours
0:26

How to Turn $15k into $529k in 15 Days A Clawdbot scaled a deposit up to $529k By trading 5-min and 15-min markets on Polymarket > the bot buys YES and NO simultaneously > If their combined price is below $1, making 4% profit instantly > 9,866 trades > 83.9% win rate > +$529k profit Check this profile here: If you wish to do the same I have outlined exactly how to create your own bot in my article Which is also where I told the story of an account making $101k in 48 hours

DPool

621,708 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

I gave Elon's Grok Bot $60 and one rule: "The day you cannot pay your own subscription is the day I unplug you". 48 hours in it is sitting on $4,412 and it already paid the bill. Autonomous trading agent on Polymarket, running on its own cloud box with its own browser and terminal. I did not write a line of code and I did not watch it trade. Every 15 minutes it: -> Pulls every market that resolves inside 24 hours. -> Reads live X sentiment, and it is Grok, so it sees every post on this app before the price moves. -> Prices each market itself and only flags a gap above 7%. -> Sizes on the gap, never above 5% of the bankroll. -> Executes in its own browser, nobody approves anything. -> Covers its own $200 subscription straight out of profits. Balance hits $0, subscription gets cancelled, it is gone for good. Hour 11 it was at $9 -> runway one day. It dumped every politics position and switched to same day baseball totals, front-running lineup cards before the market repriced. It rewrote its own strategy to not die. Setup was one evening: spin up the bot, run one trade in front of it, put it on a timer, connect Telegram with no VPS, no API keys and no dev on call. Last spring a freelancer took $2,500 for something like this -> it made $410 and died on a rate limit. Grok Bot did in one evening what $2,500 could not. $60 -> $4,412 in 48 hours. What is it sitting at by Sunday?
0:56

I gave Elon's Grok Bot $60 and one rule: "The day you cannot pay your own subscription is the day I unplug you". 48 hours in it is sitting on $4,412 and it already paid the bill. Autonomous trading agent on Polymarket, running on its own cloud box with its own browser and terminal. I did not write a line of code and I did not watch it trade. Every 15 minutes it: -> Pulls every market that resolves inside 24 hours. -> Reads live X sentiment, and it is Grok, so it sees every post on this app before the price moves. -> Prices each market itself and only flags a gap above 7%. -> Sizes on the gap, never above 5% of the bankroll. -> Executes in its own browser, nobody approves anything. -> Covers its own $200 subscription straight out of profits. Balance hits $0, subscription gets cancelled, it is gone for good. Hour 11 it was at $9 -> runway one day. It dumped every politics position and switched to same day baseball totals, front-running lineup cards before the market repriced. It rewrote its own strategy to not die. Setup was one evening: spin up the bot, run one trade in front of it, put it on a timer, connect Telegram with no VPS, no API keys and no dev on call. Last spring a freelancer took $2,500 for something like this -> it made $410 and died on a rate limit. Grok Bot did in one evening what $2,500 could not. $60 -> $4,412 in 48 hours. What is it sitting at by Sunday?

slash1s

190,860 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Three days ago I asked myself a dumb question. It was so stupid I was actually ashamed to Google it. Can AI earn money while I sleep? Not saving time. Not automating routine. I mean putting real money into my account while I am not looking at the screen. Everyone says ClawdBot will change how we work. Automation. Task management. Smart replies. But I was sitting in my kitchen thinking about something else entirely. You know that feeling when you look at a tool and realize everyone is using only 1% of its potential? It is like being given a race car and only using it to drive to the store for bread. I decided to test it. I started a notebook. I record everything. > Day One I started with something simple. I gave Clawdbot a task. Find wallets on Polymarket where the numbers do not add up. Where the profit is too high for the win rate. Where the result smells like a system rather than luck. It thought for 14 minutes. I had time to pour a coffee and forget about it. Then the screen flashed. 4 addresses. I scrolled through the first three in a minute. Big bets on politics. They guessed the election. Classic. On the fourth one I stopped. Not because it was the most profitable but because I did not understand what I was looking at. The wallet was not trading politics or sports or anything people write reviews about. It was trading the weather. I read it three times. Weather. Will it be 9 degrees in London tomorrow? Will it rain in Tokyo? These are markets I would not even click on by accident. Then I looked at the numbers. > It started with $27. It is now at $63,853. $27 is two trips to McDonald's. It is nothing. $63,853 is a new car or a down payment on an apartment. It is two years of someone's salary. Between those two numbers was only one thing. Thousands of bets on rain. I closed the tab. Opened it again. Checked if it was a glitch. Real dollars. On markets that look like a bad joke. > Day Two I could not get that wallet out of my head. I went to look at its transaction history. I expected to find one big win that explained everything. A lucky hurricane forecast. Instead I saw thousands of small bets. Boring. "Will the temperature in New York be above 15 degrees?" Then I noticed the detail that finally broke my brain. Its win rate: 33%. It loses more often than it wins. 2 out of 3 bets go to zero. Any normal person with that result would be posting about how the market is unfair. Yet this wallet is sitting on $63,000 in profit. How? I started deconstructing the trades. After an hour I got it. When it loses, it loses 10 or 20 cents. When it wins, it takes $1.00. Loses 9 times in a row? Lost $1.80. Wins 1 time? Got $10.00. > This is not trading. It is math that works as long as you do not interfere with your emotions. Here is how it works. Weather is one of the most predictable things on the planet. Governments invest billions in satellites. Data is updated every 2 or 3 hours. Precision to a tenth of a degree. This data is public. But Polymarket is not a weather station. It updates its markets with a delay of 6 or 8 hours. Imagine the situation. 6 AM. The weather service updated the forecast. The probability that London reaches 9 degrees tomorrow rose to 80%. Algorithms everywhere already recalculated the data. But on Polymarket the YES button is still sitting there for 10 cents. Because the market has not woken up yet. This bot sees the difference. It buys YES for 10 cents when the real probability is already 80%. It is not guessing. It is buying what is essentially already known. It just waits a day and collects the dollar. 10 cents turn into a dollar. On information available to anyone who can read weather APIs. That evening I called a friend. He has been trading for 3 years. He sits in analytical chats. Draws support levels. I asked him: "How was the last month?" "I broke even. The market is tough right now. Too much noise." I looked at the screen. A bot betting on rain with a 33% win rate. Profit: $63,853. My friend with 3 years of experience and hundreds of hours of analysis. Profit: $0. Who is doing it wrong? I am not asking you to take my word for it. The blockchain does not lie: > Day Three I decided to dig deeper. I looked at the wallet description. I expected something complex. A hedge fund. A team of developers. Secret data sources. I found one line: Claude plus public weather APIs. Ordinary Claude. The one on your phone. Connected to free weather services. No secret stations. No insiders. No millions for infrastructure. Just an AI doing what any of us could do. But we are too lazy. Or bored. Or we think it is too simple to work. If someone already built this with basic Claude and free APIs... What happens when Clawdbot gets direct access to trading? > Day Four I watched the wallet in real time. First bet: loss. Second bet: loss. Third bet: loss. I thought: this is it. The statistics are collapsing. Fourth bet: loss. Fifth bet: loss. Down $12 in an hour. I was ready to write a post about how I overestimated this. Sixth bet: Temperature in Chicago. Win. +$87. Seventh bet: Win. +$94. By evening: 9 losses. 5 wins. Daily total: +$385. No emotions. No posts about injustice. No strategy changes after a loss. Just the next bet. I wrote to my friend. The one who has been trading for 3 years. "How was your day?" "Down $200. Market makers caught my stop loss again." I looked at the screen. A bot with no posts and no loud claims. +$385 for the day on rain bets. My friend with 3 years of experience and dozens of books. Minus $200 and a post about how the system is against him. > Day Five I woke up with a thought that kept me up all night. It finally hit me. It is not about the weather. It is not about APIs. It is not that the bot is "smarter". > It is about what the bot does NOT have: an ego that hates being wrong. No urge to revenge-trade. No boredom from repetition. My friend trades against the market. He tries to be smarter than the crowd. This bot trades against human nature. And nature loses every day. Clawdbot found me this wallet in 14 minutes. The weather bot turned $27 into $63,000 on markets everyone else thinks are trash. Both use the same principle. Do something simple. Remove emotions. Repeat. I do not know when Clawdbot will start trading on its own. Maybe in a month. Maybe in a year. But I know one thing. While we discuss if it is possible... Someone already set up their bot and went to live their life. Right now as you read this. Somewhere a weather service updated a forecast. Polymarket is sleeping. The bot is already entering a position. And my friend is writing a post about how market makers do not let honest people earn. Guess who wakes up tomorrow with money in their account?
0:25

Three days ago I asked myself a dumb question. It was so stupid I was actually ashamed to Google it. Can AI earn money while I sleep? Not saving time. Not automating routine. I mean putting real money into my account while I am not looking at the screen. Everyone says ClawdBot will change how we work. Automation. Task management. Smart replies. But I was sitting in my kitchen thinking about something else entirely. You know that feeling when you look at a tool and realize everyone is using only 1% of its potential? It is like being given a race car and only using it to drive to the store for bread. I decided to test it. I started a notebook. I record everything. > Day One I started with something simple. I gave Clawdbot a task. Find wallets on Polymarket where the numbers do not add up. Where the profit is too high for the win rate. Where the result smells like a system rather than luck. It thought for 14 minutes. I had time to pour a coffee and forget about it. Then the screen flashed. 4 addresses. I scrolled through the first three in a minute. Big bets on politics. They guessed the election. Classic. On the fourth one I stopped. Not because it was the most profitable but because I did not understand what I was looking at. The wallet was not trading politics or sports or anything people write reviews about. It was trading the weather. I read it three times. Weather. Will it be 9 degrees in London tomorrow? Will it rain in Tokyo? These are markets I would not even click on by accident. Then I looked at the numbers. > It started with $27. It is now at $63,853. $27 is two trips to McDonald's. It is nothing. $63,853 is a new car or a down payment on an apartment. It is two years of someone's salary. Between those two numbers was only one thing. Thousands of bets on rain. I closed the tab. Opened it again. Checked if it was a glitch. Real dollars. On markets that look like a bad joke. > Day Two I could not get that wallet out of my head. I went to look at its transaction history. I expected to find one big win that explained everything. A lucky hurricane forecast. Instead I saw thousands of small bets. Boring. "Will the temperature in New York be above 15 degrees?" Then I noticed the detail that finally broke my brain. Its win rate: 33%. It loses more often than it wins. 2 out of 3 bets go to zero. Any normal person with that result would be posting about how the market is unfair. Yet this wallet is sitting on $63,000 in profit. How? I started deconstructing the trades. After an hour I got it. When it loses, it loses 10 or 20 cents. When it wins, it takes $1.00. Loses 9 times in a row? Lost $1.80. Wins 1 time? Got $10.00. > This is not trading. It is math that works as long as you do not interfere with your emotions. Here is how it works. Weather is one of the most predictable things on the planet. Governments invest billions in satellites. Data is updated every 2 or 3 hours. Precision to a tenth of a degree. This data is public. But Polymarket is not a weather station. It updates its markets with a delay of 6 or 8 hours. Imagine the situation. 6 AM. The weather service updated the forecast. The probability that London reaches 9 degrees tomorrow rose to 80%. Algorithms everywhere already recalculated the data. But on Polymarket the YES button is still sitting there for 10 cents. Because the market has not woken up yet. This bot sees the difference. It buys YES for 10 cents when the real probability is already 80%. It is not guessing. It is buying what is essentially already known. It just waits a day and collects the dollar. 10 cents turn into a dollar. On information available to anyone who can read weather APIs. That evening I called a friend. He has been trading for 3 years. He sits in analytical chats. Draws support levels. I asked him: "How was the last month?" "I broke even. The market is tough right now. Too much noise." I looked at the screen. A bot betting on rain with a 33% win rate. Profit: $63,853. My friend with 3 years of experience and hundreds of hours of analysis. Profit: $0. Who is doing it wrong? I am not asking you to take my word for it. The blockchain does not lie: > Day Three I decided to dig deeper. I looked at the wallet description. I expected something complex. A hedge fund. A team of developers. Secret data sources. I found one line: Claude plus public weather APIs. Ordinary Claude. The one on your phone. Connected to free weather services. No secret stations. No insiders. No millions for infrastructure. Just an AI doing what any of us could do. But we are too lazy. Or bored. Or we think it is too simple to work. If someone already built this with basic Claude and free APIs... What happens when Clawdbot gets direct access to trading? > Day Four I watched the wallet in real time. First bet: loss. Second bet: loss. Third bet: loss. I thought: this is it. The statistics are collapsing. Fourth bet: loss. Fifth bet: loss. Down $12 in an hour. I was ready to write a post about how I overestimated this. Sixth bet: Temperature in Chicago. Win. +$87. Seventh bet: Win. +$94. By evening: 9 losses. 5 wins. Daily total: +$385. No emotions. No posts about injustice. No strategy changes after a loss. Just the next bet. I wrote to my friend. The one who has been trading for 3 years. "How was your day?" "Down $200. Market makers caught my stop loss again." I looked at the screen. A bot with no posts and no loud claims. +$385 for the day on rain bets. My friend with 3 years of experience and dozens of books. Minus $200 and a post about how the system is against him. > Day Five I woke up with a thought that kept me up all night. It finally hit me. It is not about the weather. It is not about APIs. It is not that the bot is "smarter". > It is about what the bot does NOT have: an ego that hates being wrong. No urge to revenge-trade. No boredom from repetition. My friend trades against the market. He tries to be smarter than the crowd. This bot trades against human nature. And nature loses every day. Clawdbot found me this wallet in 14 minutes. The weather bot turned $27 into $63,000 on markets everyone else thinks are trash. Both use the same principle. Do something simple. Remove emotions. Repeat. I do not know when Clawdbot will start trading on its own. Maybe in a month. Maybe in a year. But I know one thing. While we discuss if it is possible... Someone already set up their bot and went to live their life. Right now as you read this. Somewhere a weather service updated a forecast. Polymarket is sleeping. The bot is already entering a position. And my friend is writing a post about how market makers do not let honest people earn. Guess who wakes up tomorrow with money in their account?

Blaze

29,808 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

I asked ClawdBot to find every wallet on Polymarket younger than 60 days with profit above 1 million dollars. It came back with exactly 1 result. One wallet out of hundreds of thousands. I opened the profile and spent the next two hours trying to understand what I was looking at. I expected maybe 5 or 10 results. Tens of thousands of active wallets. Somebody must qualify. ClawdBot went quiet for a couple minutes. Result: 1. I reread the filters three times. Changed nothing. Ran it again. Same result: 1. Most wallets on Polymarket are in the red. The ones in profit usually sit at a few hundred or a few thousand dollars. Wallets above $100K in total profit are already rare. Above a million in under 60 days? This one. That is it. $1,613,408. In 57 days. Here is the profile if you want to check the numbers yourself: I started breaking it down week by week. $345,000 last week. Not his best week. Just a regular week. That is roughly $49,000 per day. Every day. Weekends included. $49,000 a day is $18 million annualized. That is a small hedge fund. I asked ClawdBot how many wallets on Polymarket have ever crossed a million in total profit. The answer was under 20. Most of them have been active for six months or longer. Some over a year. This one did it in 57 days. The average profitable wallet on Polymarket makes a few thousand over its entire lifetime. This one makes $345,000 in a week. At some point you stop calling this trading and start calling it something else. I went into the trade history. ClawdBot laid it all out on a timeline. He is not trading 50 markets at once. He picks a specific type and works only those. Few entries, but each one is not small. And here is the part I cannot figure out. Almost every entry happens between 2 and 4 AM EST. Not once or twice. Consistently. As if whatever signal he uses fires in the middle of the night when nobody is watching. I stared at the screen for two hours trying to see the logic. I think I am starting to see a pattern. But that is a separate breakdown. One query. One result. $1,613,408. After that I changed the parameters. Profit above $500K, age under 90 days. ClawdBot came back with 3 wallets. Breaking those down this week.
0:35

I asked ClawdBot to find every wallet on Polymarket younger than 60 days with profit above 1 million dollars. It came back with exactly 1 result. One wallet out of hundreds of thousands. I opened the profile and spent the next two hours trying to understand what I was looking at. I expected maybe 5 or 10 results. Tens of thousands of active wallets. Somebody must qualify. ClawdBot went quiet for a couple minutes. Result: 1. I reread the filters three times. Changed nothing. Ran it again. Same result: 1. Most wallets on Polymarket are in the red. The ones in profit usually sit at a few hundred or a few thousand dollars. Wallets above $100K in total profit are already rare. Above a million in under 60 days? This one. That is it. $1,613,408. In 57 days. Here is the profile if you want to check the numbers yourself: I started breaking it down week by week. $345,000 last week. Not his best week. Just a regular week. That is roughly $49,000 per day. Every day. Weekends included. $49,000 a day is $18 million annualized. That is a small hedge fund. I asked ClawdBot how many wallets on Polymarket have ever crossed a million in total profit. The answer was under 20. Most of them have been active for six months or longer. Some over a year. This one did it in 57 days. The average profitable wallet on Polymarket makes a few thousand over its entire lifetime. This one makes $345,000 in a week. At some point you stop calling this trading and start calling it something else. I went into the trade history. ClawdBot laid it all out on a timeline. He is not trading 50 markets at once. He picks a specific type and works only those. Few entries, but each one is not small. And here is the part I cannot figure out. Almost every entry happens between 2 and 4 AM EST. Not once or twice. Consistently. As if whatever signal he uses fires in the middle of the night when nobody is watching. I stared at the screen for two hours trying to see the logic. I think I am starting to see a pattern. But that is a separate breakdown. One query. One result. $1,613,408. After that I changed the parameters. Profit above $500K, age under 90 days. ClawdBot came back with 3 wallets. Breaking those down this week.

Blaze

95,987 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

How MiroFish helped me make $669/day on Polymarket One week ago I plugged a swarm intelligence engine into my Polymarket bot. It simulates 2,847 digital humans before every trade. The bot watches how they behave, then bets against the real crowd. 338 trades. $4,266 profit. One position returned 1,655% in five minutes. The engine is called MiroFish. It doesn't predict price. It predicts how people will react and on a prediction market, that's the only thing that matters. I feed it market context. It builds a parallel world. Thousands of AI agents argue, form groups, shift opinions. When their consensus diverges from what Polymarket is pricing, the bot enters. 5-minute windows. BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP. I've been running the bot live on What MiroFish actually is: > Built in 10 days by a 20-year-old undergraduate in Beijing using vibe coding > Hit #1 on GitHub's global trending above OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft > Backed by Chen Tianqiao, former richest man in China, who committed $4.1M within 24 hours of seeing one demo > Runs on OASIS by CAMEL-AI with GraphRAG knowledge graphs and Zep Cloud memory The edge is simple. Polymarket is a crowd behavior market. MiroFish is a crowd behavior simulator. Nobody is connecting the two yet.
0:40

How MiroFish helped me make $669/day on Polymarket One week ago I plugged a swarm intelligence engine into my Polymarket bot. It simulates 2,847 digital humans before every trade. The bot watches how they behave, then bets against the real crowd. 338 trades. $4,266 profit. One position returned 1,655% in five minutes. The engine is called MiroFish. It doesn't predict price. It predicts how people will react and on a prediction market, that's the only thing that matters. I feed it market context. It builds a parallel world. Thousands of AI agents argue, form groups, shift opinions. When their consensus diverges from what Polymarket is pricing, the bot enters. 5-minute windows. BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP. I've been running the bot live on What MiroFish actually is: > Built in 10 days by a 20-year-old undergraduate in Beijing using vibe coding > Hit #1 on GitHub's global trending above OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft > Backed by Chen Tianqiao, former richest man in China, who committed $4.1M within 24 hours of seeing one demo > Runs on OASIS by CAMEL-AI with GraphRAG knowledge graphs and Zep Cloud memory The edge is simple. Polymarket is a crowd behavior market. MiroFish is a crowd behavior simulator. Nobody is connecting the two yet.

BuBBliK

125,310 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce