Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

📉 A suspected team-linked wallet just offloaded over 18.4M $LAB (~$18.3M) onto Aster DEX in the past 48 hours. Price has dropped 54% from $1.20 to around $0.383 and continues to face heavy pressure. Notably, this wallet previously received 1.96 billion $LAB from the team and still holds 81.5M...

NeutralViewLab's profile picture

Neutral View Lab

16,625 subscribers

22,368 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Crypto wallet security in 2025 still feels inconsistent across the space. In crypto, a wallet is effectively your bank, and that makes security the single most critical feature. Trust Wallet has positioned itself around this reality from the very beginning. Across volatile cycles, heavy on chain activity, new chains, and experimental dApps, the focus has stayed on protection. Transaction scanning, malicious address warnings, approval management, and risk detection are not bonus features. They are basic survival requirements in today’s environment. Trust Wallet also stands out on the compliance side. ISO certifications covering both security management and privacy reinforce that protection is not only real time but formally audited and structured. Most losses in crypto do not come from price volatility. They come from weak security and overlooked risks. Consistent, well designed protection is what keeps users safe long term, and that is where Trust Wallet continues to matter As Always NFA/DYOR
0:25

Crypto wallet security in 2025 still feels inconsistent across the space. In crypto, a wallet is effectively your bank, and that makes security the single most critical feature. Trust Wallet has positioned itself around this reality from the very beginning. Across volatile cycles, heavy on chain activity, new chains, and experimental dApps, the focus has stayed on protection. Transaction scanning, malicious address warnings, approval management, and risk detection are not bonus features. They are basic survival requirements in today’s environment. Trust Wallet also stands out on the compliance side. ISO certifications covering both security management and privacy reinforce that protection is not only real time but formally audited and structured. Most losses in crypto do not come from price volatility. They come from weak security and overlooked risks. Consistent, well designed protection is what keeps users safe long term, and that is where Trust Wallet continues to matter As Always NFA/DYOR

𝖀𝖈𝖆𝖓

10,667 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

BREAKING: We just uncovered ANOTHER lab accident at one of Fauci’s most dangerous biolabs in the country. This NIH lab quietly admitted that an unspecified virus was “either lost, stolen, or someone got exposed” in February. “It could be hantavirus.” “It could be another coronavirus.” “It could be Ebola.” “These are all the viruses that they’re experimenting on in this NIH animal lab in Montana.” This is the third scandal tied to the NIH-funded Rocky Mountain Lab just this year. First, we uncovered a “monkey bite” incident in January. Then, we received a letter from an anonymous whistleblower alleging that Vincent Munster, one of the NIH mad scientists at this animal lab, was caught trying to smuggle “dozens of vials” of viruses from Africa onto US soil. And RFK Jr. confirmed that report to Laura Loomer. Here’s all the details we know so far: WCW Senior VP Justin Goodman told Laura Loomer that we uncovered documents from this Rocky Mountain Lab quietly admitting “another unspecified laboratory accident in late February.” “We don’t know exactly what that virus was.” “This is a recipe for disaster.” “Having this laboratory in the middle of the country.” “Having deranged animal experimenters flying around the world and bringing viruses that don’t exist in the United States, that in some cases no one in this country has ever been exposed to or infected with… from around the world… and experimenting on them.” “And then repeatedly having accidents where staff are exposed… animals infected with diseases have gotten loose from the laboratory.” “You have people being exposed through monkey bites.” “You have these rogue animal experimenters flying with viruses all around the world.” “Donald Trump promised accountability.” “He promised he’d clean up the NIH.” “And RFK promised he would completely eliminate primate testing at the agency because it’s wasteful and cruel and unnecessary.” “But he’s still funding this laboratory out in Montana, among many, many others.” “So where is the accountability?” This is one of two scandals tied to this NIH-funded lab we’re currently investigating. Stay tuned for more. Follow White Coat Waste Justin Goodman Laura Loomer Loomer Unleashed
2:48

BREAKING: We just uncovered ANOTHER lab accident at one of Fauci’s most dangerous biolabs in the country. This NIH lab quietly admitted that an unspecified virus was “either lost, stolen, or someone got exposed” in February. “It could be hantavirus.” “It could be another coronavirus.” “It could be Ebola.” “These are all the viruses that they’re experimenting on in this NIH animal lab in Montana.” This is the third scandal tied to the NIH-funded Rocky Mountain Lab just this year. First, we uncovered a “monkey bite” incident in January. Then, we received a letter from an anonymous whistleblower alleging that Vincent Munster, one of the NIH mad scientists at this animal lab, was caught trying to smuggle “dozens of vials” of viruses from Africa onto US soil. And RFK Jr. confirmed that report to Laura Loomer. Here’s all the details we know so far: WCW Senior VP Justin Goodman told Laura Loomer that we uncovered documents from this Rocky Mountain Lab quietly admitting “another unspecified laboratory accident in late February.” “We don’t know exactly what that virus was.” “This is a recipe for disaster.” “Having this laboratory in the middle of the country.” “Having deranged animal experimenters flying around the world and bringing viruses that don’t exist in the United States, that in some cases no one in this country has ever been exposed to or infected with… from around the world… and experimenting on them.” “And then repeatedly having accidents where staff are exposed… animals infected with diseases have gotten loose from the laboratory.” “You have people being exposed through monkey bites.” “You have these rogue animal experimenters flying with viruses all around the world.” “Donald Trump promised accountability.” “He promised he’d clean up the NIH.” “And RFK promised he would completely eliminate primate testing at the agency because it’s wasteful and cruel and unnecessary.” “But he’s still funding this laboratory out in Montana, among many, many others.” “So where is the accountability?” This is one of two scandals tied to this NIH-funded lab we’re currently investigating. Stay tuned for more. Follow White Coat Waste Justin Goodman Laura Loomer Loomer Unleashed

White Coat Waste

26,892 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

BREAKING: We’re supporting a lawsuit to force the release of files on a $200,000 NIH-funded kitten abuse lab. We exposed that an Auburn University lab is breeding kittens to suffer debilitating and deadly diseases, conducting invasive experiments on them, then killing them at just a few months old. One tragic video we uncovered showed a kitten struggling to walk and, according to Auburn, close to death. And these cruel experiments are all funded by your tax dollars. Here’s the background on this new lawsuit: In July 2025, an Auburn alum and Alabama taxpayer requested records on these kitten experiments. Auburn refused. Our investigation has already uncovered that this Auburn University lab has bred thousands of sick kittens over nearly half a century. These kittens are bred to suffer from genetic disorders that cause loss of muscle control, difficulty walking, vision loss, tremors, and early death. Auburn confined and abused 134 cats and kittens in 2024. Under Secetary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., the NIH is still funding this cruel cat lab despite promising last year to end testing on pets. We’ve been fighting for files on these abusive NIH-funded experiments for years, and we’re not backing down. Taxpayers have a right to know how their money is being spent so they can hold bureucrats accountable.. Follow White Coat Waste Auburn University
0:32

BREAKING: We’re supporting a lawsuit to force the release of files on a $200,000 NIH-funded kitten abuse lab. We exposed that an Auburn University lab is breeding kittens to suffer debilitating and deadly diseases, conducting invasive experiments on them, then killing them at just a few months old. One tragic video we uncovered showed a kitten struggling to walk and, according to Auburn, close to death. And these cruel experiments are all funded by your tax dollars. Here’s the background on this new lawsuit: In July 2025, an Auburn alum and Alabama taxpayer requested records on these kitten experiments. Auburn refused. Our investigation has already uncovered that this Auburn University lab has bred thousands of sick kittens over nearly half a century. These kittens are bred to suffer from genetic disorders that cause loss of muscle control, difficulty walking, vision loss, tremors, and early death. Auburn confined and abused 134 cats and kittens in 2024. Under Secetary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., the NIH is still funding this cruel cat lab despite promising last year to end testing on pets. We’ve been fighting for files on these abusive NIH-funded experiments for years, and we’re not backing down. Taxpayers have a right to know how their money is being spent so they can hold bureucrats accountable.. Follow White Coat Waste Auburn University

White Coat Waste

524,093 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

DNI Gabbard just dropped the COVID bomb declassifying it ALL. This is the FULL 4 PART DOCUMENT SET. All the files in one place. The full declassified series tells a clear timeline of lies, backdoor funding and a clear cover up of the manufacturing of bioweapons. 2016–2018: Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) had advanced synthetic biology tools, 2016 DNA assembly paper. U.S. diplomats warned of biosafety failures on gain-of-function bat coronavirus research. Feb 2020: Top officials including Fauci met to gather data on virus origins and fight "misinformation." 2020–2021: IC assessments split, one agency moderate confidence in lab incident at WIV, FBI leaned lab, others low confidence natural. WIV researchers got sick in fall 2019. Fauci's own 2012 letter described a near-identical GOF lab accident scenario. Internal IC emails: Officials avoided letting Fauci review origins papers due to "conflict of interest." Debates raged over the furin cleavage site looking like possible GOF modification. May 2021: Biden ordered a 90-day probe as IC remained divided. Whistleblowers alleged intelligence contradicted Fauci's testimony denying NIH GOF funding at WIV. Genetic evidence and declassified position paper: High probability SARS-CoV-2 was lab-produced, specific S-protein changes and a suspicious 12-nucleotide insert matching bat misc-RNA. Strongest accusations and the Rand Paul transcript: Fauci commissioned scientists to publicly deny lab origin while they privately believed it. CIA analysts voted **6-1 for lab leak**, then reversed. Fauci made unlogged CIA visits. He approved risky research without safety committee sign-off. China lied for weeks and destroyed evidence. Overall it shows early knowledge of risks, U.S. funding of dangerous work at WIV, divided intelligence favoring lab incident in key agencies, and alleged orchestration to suppress the lab-leak theory in favor of natural origin. Summary of Each Document Set: Part-1 - Core early evidence & IC split: Declassified compilation of 2016–2023 materials. Key items: Feb 2020 Fauci meeting on origins data, 2016 WIV synthetic biology paper, 2018 U.S. diplomat biosafety warnings, 2021 IC 90-day assessment one agency moderate confidence lab incident at WIV, FBI lab-leaning, others low-confidence natural, Fauci's 2012 GOF pandemic hypothetical letter, and $600k NIH funding to WIV via EcoHealth. Accusations focus on Fauci/IC suppressing lab-leak discussion and stonewalling Congress. Part-2 - Internal IC debates + Rand Paul bombshell: Internal 2020–2021 emails and transcripts. Shows IC avoiding Fauci as reviewer due to conflict of interest, debates on whether the furin cleavage site indicated GOF. Features a detailed Rand Paul transcript accusing Fauci of orchestrating a cover-up commissioning scientists to publicly deny lab origin while they privately suspected it, CIA reversing a 6-1 lab-leak vote by analysts, unlogged Fauci CIA visits, approval of GOF-style research without safety oversight, and China lying for weeks about transmission and WIV illnesses. Part-3 - 2021 official shift + genetic evidence: May 2021 news clippings and documents around Biden's 90-day origins probe order. Includes IC divisions, WIV researchers ill in Nov 2019, Fauci defending WIV funding in Senate testimony, reference to Daszak describing spike-protein manipulation, whistleblower complaints that intelligence contradicted Fauci's GOF denial, and a key position paper arguing "high probability" SARS-CoV-2 was lab-produced with specific engineered S-protein changes and a 12-nucleotide insert. Also references 2008 synthetic coronavirus reconstruction paper. Part-4 - Reinforcing internal materials: Additional declassified internal communications and assessments continuing the same themes. Limited extractable text appears more image/redacted-heavy, but reinforces prior parts with further documentation on origins assessments, GOF research links, funding questions, and accountability issues. Fits the overall pattern of highlighting lab-related evidence and alleged suppression/cover-up efforts. Combined Narrative Across All 4 Parts: From 2016 capabilities and 2018 warnings → Early 2020 awareness meeting → 2021 divided IC assessments leaning lab key places → Genetic arguments for lab manipulation → Whistleblower contradictions of Fauci → Strong public accusations of orchestrated cover-up by Fauci and elements of the IC, plus Chinese obstruction. The release challenges the early natural-origin consensus and calls for transparency on U.S.-funded risky research at WIV. It's time for prosecutions.
24:19

DNI Gabbard just dropped the COVID bomb declassifying it ALL. This is the FULL 4 PART DOCUMENT SET. All the files in one place. The full declassified series tells a clear timeline of lies, backdoor funding and a clear cover up of the manufacturing of bioweapons. 2016–2018: Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) had advanced synthetic biology tools, 2016 DNA assembly paper. U.S. diplomats warned of biosafety failures on gain-of-function bat coronavirus research. Feb 2020: Top officials including Fauci met to gather data on virus origins and fight "misinformation." 2020–2021: IC assessments split, one agency moderate confidence in lab incident at WIV, FBI leaned lab, others low confidence natural. WIV researchers got sick in fall 2019. Fauci's own 2012 letter described a near-identical GOF lab accident scenario. Internal IC emails: Officials avoided letting Fauci review origins papers due to "conflict of interest." Debates raged over the furin cleavage site looking like possible GOF modification. May 2021: Biden ordered a 90-day probe as IC remained divided. Whistleblowers alleged intelligence contradicted Fauci's testimony denying NIH GOF funding at WIV. Genetic evidence and declassified position paper: High probability SARS-CoV-2 was lab-produced, specific S-protein changes and a suspicious 12-nucleotide insert matching bat misc-RNA. Strongest accusations and the Rand Paul transcript: Fauci commissioned scientists to publicly deny lab origin while they privately believed it. CIA analysts voted **6-1 for lab leak**, then reversed. Fauci made unlogged CIA visits. He approved risky research without safety committee sign-off. China lied for weeks and destroyed evidence. Overall it shows early knowledge of risks, U.S. funding of dangerous work at WIV, divided intelligence favoring lab incident in key agencies, and alleged orchestration to suppress the lab-leak theory in favor of natural origin. Summary of Each Document Set: Part-1 - Core early evidence & IC split: Declassified compilation of 2016–2023 materials. Key items: Feb 2020 Fauci meeting on origins data, 2016 WIV synthetic biology paper, 2018 U.S. diplomat biosafety warnings, 2021 IC 90-day assessment one agency moderate confidence lab incident at WIV, FBI lab-leaning, others low-confidence natural, Fauci's 2012 GOF pandemic hypothetical letter, and $600k NIH funding to WIV via EcoHealth. Accusations focus on Fauci/IC suppressing lab-leak discussion and stonewalling Congress. Part-2 - Internal IC debates + Rand Paul bombshell: Internal 2020–2021 emails and transcripts. Shows IC avoiding Fauci as reviewer due to conflict of interest, debates on whether the furin cleavage site indicated GOF. Features a detailed Rand Paul transcript accusing Fauci of orchestrating a cover-up commissioning scientists to publicly deny lab origin while they privately suspected it, CIA reversing a 6-1 lab-leak vote by analysts, unlogged Fauci CIA visits, approval of GOF-style research without safety oversight, and China lying for weeks about transmission and WIV illnesses. Part-3 - 2021 official shift + genetic evidence: May 2021 news clippings and documents around Biden's 90-day origins probe order. Includes IC divisions, WIV researchers ill in Nov 2019, Fauci defending WIV funding in Senate testimony, reference to Daszak describing spike-protein manipulation, whistleblower complaints that intelligence contradicted Fauci's GOF denial, and a key position paper arguing "high probability" SARS-CoV-2 was lab-produced with specific engineered S-protein changes and a 12-nucleotide insert. Also references 2008 synthetic coronavirus reconstruction paper. Part-4 - Reinforcing internal materials: Additional declassified internal communications and assessments continuing the same themes. Limited extractable text appears more image/redacted-heavy, but reinforces prior parts with further documentation on origins assessments, GOF research links, funding questions, and accountability issues. Fits the overall pattern of highlighting lab-related evidence and alleged suppression/cover-up efforts. Combined Narrative Across All 4 Parts: From 2016 capabilities and 2018 warnings → Early 2020 awareness meeting → 2021 divided IC assessments leaning lab key places → Genetic arguments for lab manipulation → Whistleblower contradictions of Fauci → Strong public accusations of orchestrated cover-up by Fauci and elements of the IC, plus Chinese obstruction. The release challenges the early natural-origin consensus and calls for transparency on U.S.-funded risky research at WIV. It's time for prosecutions.

The SCIF

117,335 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The FDA just announced there’s another cyclospora outbreak. Seventy-two people have been linked to the new outbreak, according to an update posted on the agency’s website Wednesday. While the agency has launched traceback investigations, it has not provided any information on the source of the parasite or the outbreak location. Messaging around these outbreaks has been confusing and health experts say that’s in part because of the difficulty in tracking the parasite, which also can’t be reproduced in a lab. The previous major outbreak, focused in Michigan and four surrounding states, has been linked to shredded iceberg lettuce sold by Taylor Farms and grown in central Mexico, though that’s not been confirmed through lab testing. On Friday, the Washington Post reported that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has linked this outbreak to four additional states — Illinois, Kansas, Oklahoma and Pennsylvania — bringing the total to nine. Meanwhile, individual cases of cyclosporiasis have now been reported in 41 states. While we wait for more information, these are still good food safety tips to follow: Wash hands with soap and water before handling food. Alcohol-based sanitizers don’t kill cyclospora, but soap and water is highly effective. Make sure to wash your produce well and cook food to at least 158 degrees Fahrenheit. Lastly, stay away from recalled produce and wash surfaces that it may have touched.
1:39

The FDA just announced there’s another cyclospora outbreak. Seventy-two people have been linked to the new outbreak, according to an update posted on the agency’s website Wednesday. While the agency has launched traceback investigations, it has not provided any information on the source of the parasite or the outbreak location. Messaging around these outbreaks has been confusing and health experts say that’s in part because of the difficulty in tracking the parasite, which also can’t be reproduced in a lab. The previous major outbreak, focused in Michigan and four surrounding states, has been linked to shredded iceberg lettuce sold by Taylor Farms and grown in central Mexico, though that’s not been confirmed through lab testing. On Friday, the Washington Post reported that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has linked this outbreak to four additional states — Illinois, Kansas, Oklahoma and Pennsylvania — bringing the total to nine. Meanwhile, individual cases of cyclosporiasis have now been reported in 41 states. While we wait for more information, these are still good food safety tips to follow: Wash hands with soap and water before handling food. Alcohol-based sanitizers don’t kill cyclospora, but soap and water is highly effective. Make sure to wash your produce well and cook food to at least 158 degrees Fahrenheit. Lastly, stay away from recalled produce and wash surfaces that it may have touched.

PBS News

19,412 görüntüleme • 18 gün önce

🚨$JPROOF by Stew Peters is officially a scam token 📈 I called this project at $3M MC and it sits at $36M MC ✡️ I soent weeks shilling for this token and made several images for the project, as well as defended against FUD because I trusted Stew and the team at $JPROOF After careful consideration from concerns brought up by @Delko_Radio87 and Funk_Machine_ who had the BALLS to express their concerns about potential fraud within the project on JQRADIO247 when STEW PETERS was present, me and my team spent days looking into these concerns further The team was calculated in their scamming efforts, even evading all the previous concerns brought up by @burkeanorder in his amazing thread 👇 That revealed all of the possible ways this token could be scammed, I still was in denial However, today 06/02/2025, the team exposed themselves by taking 3M $JPROOF tokens from the Market Maker wallet (which contained originally 20M tokens transferred directly from Stews wallet) Website link below 👇 20M tokens to MM wallet Upon questioning the team about the subsequent 25% dip in price today, they admitted the following (see pics) although they deleted me from the Telegram and the questions I was asking. “Where did the 3Million $JPROOF come from that was paired to the $10k in SOL in the new pump swap LP?” “Where is the transaction for the “BUY” of the 3M $JPROOF to pair with the SOL to create the pool as suggested by BB today that “anyone can buy JPROOF and create a pool”? At this point they just banned me from the TG and deleted my messages, although these retarded MFs forgot to delete their own incriminating responses to my questions, which my homie was able to screenshot quickly. These screenshots reveal: • Stew Peters transferred 20M tokens to a “market maker wallet” or so they called it • 3M $JPROOF was taken from that wallet and paired with $10k in $SOL and added to a new LP without any notification to the community • Insiders aware of this pairing sniped this supply and immediately sold for ~$60k profit • The team LIED about the LP being locked • The team LIED about the contract being immutable • The team LIED about “buying” this supply (see pics) and instead took these directly from the MM wallet which was a direct trasnfer from Stews wallet • Stew has been silent on this while collecting tens of thousands of dollars of his community who most of which are much less rich than he is FUCK YOU Stew Peters you lying grifting cuck, you’ve underestimated the movement, and it’s about to turn on you. Better to delete your 𝕏 and rumble accounts now 👀 and just go away for awhile
0:44

🚨$JPROOF by Stew Peters is officially a scam token 📈 I called this project at $3M MC and it sits at $36M MC ✡️ I soent weeks shilling for this token and made several images for the project, as well as defended against FUD because I trusted Stew and the team at $JPROOF After careful consideration from concerns brought up by @Delko_Radio87 and Funk_Machine_ who had the BALLS to express their concerns about potential fraud within the project on JQRADIO247 when STEW PETERS was present, me and my team spent days looking into these concerns further The team was calculated in their scamming efforts, even evading all the previous concerns brought up by @burkeanorder in his amazing thread 👇 That revealed all of the possible ways this token could be scammed, I still was in denial However, today 06/02/2025, the team exposed themselves by taking 3M $JPROOF tokens from the Market Maker wallet (which contained originally 20M tokens transferred directly from Stews wallet) Website link below 👇 20M tokens to MM wallet Upon questioning the team about the subsequent 25% dip in price today, they admitted the following (see pics) although they deleted me from the Telegram and the questions I was asking. “Where did the 3Million $JPROOF come from that was paired to the $10k in SOL in the new pump swap LP?” “Where is the transaction for the “BUY” of the 3M $JPROOF to pair with the SOL to create the pool as suggested by BB today that “anyone can buy JPROOF and create a pool”? At this point they just banned me from the TG and deleted my messages, although these retarded MFs forgot to delete their own incriminating responses to my questions, which my homie was able to screenshot quickly. These screenshots reveal: • Stew Peters transferred 20M tokens to a “market maker wallet” or so they called it • 3M $JPROOF was taken from that wallet and paired with $10k in $SOL and added to a new LP without any notification to the community • Insiders aware of this pairing sniped this supply and immediately sold for ~$60k profit • The team LIED about the LP being locked • The team LIED about the contract being immutable • The team LIED about “buying” this supply (see pics) and instead took these directly from the MM wallet which was a direct trasnfer from Stews wallet • Stew has been silent on this while collecting tens of thousands of dollars of his community who most of which are much less rich than he is FUCK YOU Stew Peters you lying grifting cuck, you’ve underestimated the movement, and it’s about to turn on you. Better to delete your 𝕏 and rumble accounts now 👀 and just go away for awhile

AK

99,880 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

I’ve been quietly investigating water contamination in the UK’s supply chain, submitting FOI requests to nearly every water company for data spanning the past five years. I’m now beginning to receive official lab results — and what’s emerging is deeply concerning. Here’s what one water company’s data shows: – One water sample recorded 1.8 MILLION µg/L of lead — that’s 180,000 times the UK legal limit (10 µg/L) – Multiple spikes in iron, copper, aluminium, manganese, and nickel – No data disclosed on microplastics, PFAS (forever chemicals), or pharmaceuticals – Every breach triggered internal risk reviews — but no public warnings are mentioned in the FOI response Yes — this is pre-treatment data. But if contamination is this high at the source, it raises serious questions about infrastructure, monitoring, and public transparency. This is just one company. More data is on the way. The British public deserves to know what might be in their water. P.S. A big thank you to Josh Ferme for looking over the data — and apologies for mispronouncing your surname after all these years.
9:09

I’ve been quietly investigating water contamination in the UK’s supply chain, submitting FOI requests to nearly every water company for data spanning the past five years. I’m now beginning to receive official lab results — and what’s emerging is deeply concerning. Here’s what one water company’s data shows: – One water sample recorded 1.8 MILLION µg/L of lead — that’s 180,000 times the UK legal limit (10 µg/L) – Multiple spikes in iron, copper, aluminium, manganese, and nickel – No data disclosed on microplastics, PFAS (forever chemicals), or pharmaceuticals – Every breach triggered internal risk reviews — but no public warnings are mentioned in the FOI response Yes — this is pre-treatment data. But if contamination is this high at the source, it raises serious questions about infrastructure, monitoring, and public transparency. This is just one company. More data is on the way. The British public deserves to know what might be in their water. P.S. A big thank you to Josh Ferme for looking over the data — and apologies for mispronouncing your surname after all these years.

Lewis Brackpool

101,583 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

BREAKING - EXPLOSIVE: Republican Congressman Jim Jordan (Rep. Jim Jordan) confronts Dr. Fauci on alleged COVID-19 cover-up and outright lies. WATCH Question: Thank you, Mister Chairman. Doctor, why was it so important that the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: We don't know where it started. And that's the reason why I keep an open mind. So I don't know what you mean by why was it so important. It wasn't important. Question: You still don't know where it started. The guys you gave money to figured out in three days. Answer: No, no, no. They said, Mister Anderson said on January 31, 2020, virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory. The very next day, Doctor Gerry said, I don't know how this happens in nature. It'd be easy to do in a lab. And then three days later, Shazam, they switched and say it has to be nature. So they figured out in three days. But you still don't know. Answer: No. In fact, if you look at what they were saying, Congressman Jordan, they were saying that it was not a manufactured virus. It still could have evolved out of a lab. Question: Let me read something here to you. They're not incompatible. In our study on the censorship of the Biden administration working with big tech, I want to read you a WhatsApp message from Mark Zuckerberg. Can we include that? The White House put pressure on us to censor the lab leak theory? Answer: Is there a question? Question: Here's another email to Mark Zuckerberg. It says, subject line COVID misinformation, Wuhan lab leak theory. Due to continued public pressure and tense conversations with the new administration, we started removing five COVID claims, including the lab leak theory. Mister Zuckerberg responds, this seems like a good reminder that when we compromise our standards due to pressure from an administration in either direction, we often later regret it. Why was it so important the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: It wasn't so important that the virus not. We don't know. Question: We know it was important to someone in the Biden administration. So much so that the top people at Meta, the top people at Facebook are asking, why are we getting all this pressure to downplay the lab leak theory? And we have an email from June of the same year, June 4, 2021, saying the same thing. It was certainly important to somebody. Answer: Well, what does that got to do with me? Question: I'm asking you because you're the expert on the coronavirus. I'm saying, why was the administration so pushing not to have the lab leak theory as something that was viable? Answer: I can answer that. I've kept an open mind throughout the entire time. Question: Doctor Fauci. Open mind. Answer: That is correct. Question: What happened in those three days? Why did Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry, why did they change their mind in 180 degrees? Because what Christian Andersen says three days later after he said virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory, three days later, he says the main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered. And that is demonstrably false. Question: How did they figure all that out in three days? Answer: Well, what they did is that, you know, they testified before this committee what they did. They went back and looked at the sequences and realized that their initial concern was unfounded about that. And it did not look at all like it was manufactured. Question: But in three days, they figured that out? Answer: Exactly. You could do that in three days. You can scan sequences in a day. You don't need three days. Question: Okay, who's Robert Redfield? Answer: The former director of the CDC. Question: Doctor Redfield. Right. And he was also in the coronavirus task force. Is that accurate? Answer: He was a member of the coronavirus task force. Question: Here's what he said to this committee. He said, Redfield said that Fauci and Collins left him out because Redfield suspected that coronavirus had leaked from the Chinese lab. Is that accurate? Answer: Well, he said that, but that's not true. That is incorrect. Question: Congressman, Doctor Redfield's lying to the committee? Answer: When he sat right where you sat when he said that I kept him out. That is an incorrect statement. Question: The roster who was on the phone, was Doctor Redfield in that conference call on February 1 when you had Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry on that call? Answer: He was not. And the conference call was put together by Jeremy Farrar. So no one kept him out. Question: He said he was kept out because did US tax dollars. Answer: You want me to answer the question? Question: Yeah. I would just wonder why it wasn't on the call. It seems to me the head of CDC, part of the coronavirus task force, which was formed two days prior to that call, would have been on the call. Answer: Well, the call was arranged by Jeremy Farrar. You should ask him. Question: Okay. Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: I'm sorry, what was? Question: Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: Yes, of course. It was a sub-award to the Wuhan Institute. Question: And who approved that award? Answer: Excuse me? Question: And who approved that award? Answer: What agency approved that award? Answer: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Question: Your agency approved that, right? Answer: Yes, it did. Question: Does that have anything to do with this downplaying of the lab leak theory? Answer: No, nothing to do with it. Question: Nothing. Do you agree that there was a push to downplay the lab leak theory? Answer: Not on my part. Question: Really? Really. Wow. Wow. I think most of the country find that amazing. Answer: I've kept an open mind throughout the entire process. Question: All right, I yield back.
5:43

BREAKING - EXPLOSIVE: Republican Congressman Jim Jordan (Rep. Jim Jordan) confronts Dr. Fauci on alleged COVID-19 cover-up and outright lies. WATCH Question: Thank you, Mister Chairman. Doctor, why was it so important that the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: We don't know where it started. And that's the reason why I keep an open mind. So I don't know what you mean by why was it so important. It wasn't important. Question: You still don't know where it started. The guys you gave money to figured out in three days. Answer: No, no, no. They said, Mister Anderson said on January 31, 2020, virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory. The very next day, Doctor Gerry said, I don't know how this happens in nature. It'd be easy to do in a lab. And then three days later, Shazam, they switched and say it has to be nature. So they figured out in three days. But you still don't know. Answer: No. In fact, if you look at what they were saying, Congressman Jordan, they were saying that it was not a manufactured virus. It still could have evolved out of a lab. Question: Let me read something here to you. They're not incompatible. In our study on the censorship of the Biden administration working with big tech, I want to read you a WhatsApp message from Mark Zuckerberg. Can we include that? The White House put pressure on us to censor the lab leak theory? Answer: Is there a question? Question: Here's another email to Mark Zuckerberg. It says, subject line COVID misinformation, Wuhan lab leak theory. Due to continued public pressure and tense conversations with the new administration, we started removing five COVID claims, including the lab leak theory. Mister Zuckerberg responds, this seems like a good reminder that when we compromise our standards due to pressure from an administration in either direction, we often later regret it. Why was it so important the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: It wasn't so important that the virus not. We don't know. Question: We know it was important to someone in the Biden administration. So much so that the top people at Meta, the top people at Facebook are asking, why are we getting all this pressure to downplay the lab leak theory? And we have an email from June of the same year, June 4, 2021, saying the same thing. It was certainly important to somebody. Answer: Well, what does that got to do with me? Question: I'm asking you because you're the expert on the coronavirus. I'm saying, why was the administration so pushing not to have the lab leak theory as something that was viable? Answer: I can answer that. I've kept an open mind throughout the entire time. Question: Doctor Fauci. Open mind. Answer: That is correct. Question: What happened in those three days? Why did Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry, why did they change their mind in 180 degrees? Because what Christian Andersen says three days later after he said virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory, three days later, he says the main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered. And that is demonstrably false. Question: How did they figure all that out in three days? Answer: Well, what they did is that, you know, they testified before this committee what they did. They went back and looked at the sequences and realized that their initial concern was unfounded about that. And it did not look at all like it was manufactured. Question: But in three days, they figured that out? Answer: Exactly. You could do that in three days. You can scan sequences in a day. You don't need three days. Question: Okay, who's Robert Redfield? Answer: The former director of the CDC. Question: Doctor Redfield. Right. And he was also in the coronavirus task force. Is that accurate? Answer: He was a member of the coronavirus task force. Question: Here's what he said to this committee. He said, Redfield said that Fauci and Collins left him out because Redfield suspected that coronavirus had leaked from the Chinese lab. Is that accurate? Answer: Well, he said that, but that's not true. That is incorrect. Question: Congressman, Doctor Redfield's lying to the committee? Answer: When he sat right where you sat when he said that I kept him out. That is an incorrect statement. Question: The roster who was on the phone, was Doctor Redfield in that conference call on February 1 when you had Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry on that call? Answer: He was not. And the conference call was put together by Jeremy Farrar. So no one kept him out. Question: He said he was kept out because did US tax dollars. Answer: You want me to answer the question? Question: Yeah. I would just wonder why it wasn't on the call. It seems to me the head of CDC, part of the coronavirus task force, which was formed two days prior to that call, would have been on the call. Answer: Well, the call was arranged by Jeremy Farrar. You should ask him. Question: Okay. Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: I'm sorry, what was? Question: Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: Yes, of course. It was a sub-award to the Wuhan Institute. Question: And who approved that award? Answer: Excuse me? Question: And who approved that award? Answer: What agency approved that award? Answer: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Question: Your agency approved that, right? Answer: Yes, it did. Question: Does that have anything to do with this downplaying of the lab leak theory? Answer: No, nothing to do with it. Question: Nothing. Do you agree that there was a push to downplay the lab leak theory? Answer: Not on my part. Question: Really? Really. Wow. Wow. I think most of the country find that amazing. Answer: I've kept an open mind throughout the entire process. Question: All right, I yield back.

Simon Ateba

997,322 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

A hacker is trying to break into Trezors holding $75 MILLION. The biggest one has $66 MILLION sitting on a single device. > Joe Grand has been a hardware hacker since he was 10 years old. He works out of a backyard lab. > For the past 3 years he has been doing one thing. Breaking into hardware wallets for people who locked themselves out years ago and forgot their PIN. > The method he uses was not invented by him. > In 2017 a 15 year old self-taught programmer named Saleem Rashid was sitting in his bedroom in the south of England. > He found a flaw in the Trezor wallet that nobody else had found. > He used it to recover $30,000 in Bitcoin for a Wired editor who had locked himself out of his own wallet. > Trezor patched it. But old devices running the old firmware were still vulnerable. > Thousands of them are sitting in drawers and full of Bitcoin people thought they would never see again. > Joe Grand spent 3 years learning how to exploit that same flaw. > He is now working through a backlog of wallets totaling $75 MILLION > The single largest device on his list holds $66 MILLION. > A 15-year-old figured this out with a pair of tweezers in his bedroom to save $30,000. The same exploit is now unlocking $66 MILLION from a backyard lab.
1:28

A hacker is trying to break into Trezors holding $75 MILLION. The biggest one has $66 MILLION sitting on a single device. > Joe Grand has been a hardware hacker since he was 10 years old. He works out of a backyard lab. > For the past 3 years he has been doing one thing. Breaking into hardware wallets for people who locked themselves out years ago and forgot their PIN. > The method he uses was not invented by him. > In 2017 a 15 year old self-taught programmer named Saleem Rashid was sitting in his bedroom in the south of England. > He found a flaw in the Trezor wallet that nobody else had found. > He used it to recover $30,000 in Bitcoin for a Wired editor who had locked himself out of his own wallet. > Trezor patched it. But old devices running the old firmware were still vulnerable. > Thousands of them are sitting in drawers and full of Bitcoin people thought they would never see again. > Joe Grand spent 3 years learning how to exploit that same flaw. > He is now working through a backlog of wallets totaling $75 MILLION > The single largest device on his list holds $66 MILLION. > A 15-year-old figured this out with a pair of tweezers in his bedroom to save $30,000. The same exploit is now unlocking $66 MILLION from a backyard lab.

Comet

30,357 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

We're approaching the dawn of medical superintelligence - the moment when affordable, world-class medical knowledge and support is at your fingertips whenever you need it. I think people are still underestimating how profound this transformation is going to be. Today we're announcing Copilot Health, enabling users to connect all their EHR records and wearable data in a secure, private health space that Copilot can analyze and reason about to provide personalized insights and proactive nudges. You choose what information to connect - from hospital lab results to your fitness tracker - and Copilot Health applies medical intelligence to surface easy to understand, personalized insights that you can actually act on. It's a dedicated space to bring your personal health data together in a single profile, including: - Activity, sleep, and vital trends from 50+ wearable devices, including Apple Health, Oura, Fitbit and many more - Health records from 50,000+ U.S. hospital and health systems, including visit summaries, medications, and test results - Comprehensive lab test results from Function Copilot Health enables people to arrive at their appointment with the right questions and the right context to make the time they have with doctors really count. Your data is always your data, and you are always in full control. Your data won't be used to train our AI models, and you can disconnect sources at any time. Our Copilot Health responses are also grounded in information from credible health organizations like Harvard Health, as well as real-time US provider directories to find the right real-world care. Copilot Health is launching first in the US to adults over 18, but we ultimately want to make this service available to the billions of people around the world who struggle to access reliable medical advice. Please give it a go and sign up to join the early Copilot Health community and help shape what comes next. More on the MAI blog:
2:02

We're approaching the dawn of medical superintelligence - the moment when affordable, world-class medical knowledge and support is at your fingertips whenever you need it. I think people are still underestimating how profound this transformation is going to be. Today we're announcing Copilot Health, enabling users to connect all their EHR records and wearable data in a secure, private health space that Copilot can analyze and reason about to provide personalized insights and proactive nudges. You choose what information to connect - from hospital lab results to your fitness tracker - and Copilot Health applies medical intelligence to surface easy to understand, personalized insights that you can actually act on. It's a dedicated space to bring your personal health data together in a single profile, including: - Activity, sleep, and vital trends from 50+ wearable devices, including Apple Health, Oura, Fitbit and many more - Health records from 50,000+ U.S. hospital and health systems, including visit summaries, medications, and test results - Comprehensive lab test results from Function Copilot Health enables people to arrive at their appointment with the right questions and the right context to make the time they have with doctors really count. Your data is always your data, and you are always in full control. Your data won't be used to train our AI models, and you can disconnect sources at any time. Our Copilot Health responses are also grounded in information from credible health organizations like Harvard Health, as well as real-time US provider directories to find the right real-world care. Copilot Health is launching first in the US to adults over 18, but we ultimately want to make this service available to the billions of people around the world who struggle to access reliable medical advice. Please give it a go and sign up to join the early Copilot Health community and help shape what comes next. More on the MAI blog:

Mustafa Suleyman

167,131 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

❗️❗️Breaking! Google just didn’t seed fund First Draft News, the first major US and global censorship org, it CREATED IT! I also have finally gotten the names of the Google employees they used to start the global censorship in 2015. This was in preparation for the 2016 elections. Yup, the same Google that visited the Obama White House 427 times. And the same Google that helped Obama win both his first and second presidencies! Interestingly, Tim Walz went on to hire one of the two Google individuals, Steve Grove. All along I thought the First Draft News consortium was started on June 18, 2015, when it was announced by Olivia Ma. But actually contact was made in April 2015. I’ve been looking for more specifics on First Drafts origins for years, now I have TWO SOURCES. Also Google expanded its support to include its GLOBAL TEAM. 1. First Draft website: “Most importantly, a final huge thank you to Steve Grove and Olivia Ma at Google News Lab. They got us all in a room in New York in April 2015 and FLOATED THE IDEA of First Draft. Since then, their support and enthusiasm, now combined with the same from their global team, has been invaluable. 2. Google News Lab on Medium - Steve Grove Director of the News Lab at Google. “At the center of our efforts around this topic is the First Draft coalition, WHICH WE STARTED in 2015 with seven social media verification organizations to create standards and best practices in the news industry for verifying eyewitness media content and COMBATTING FAKE NEWS. In 2016, we expanded the coalition to over 80 partners worldwide, and were thrilled to welcome Facebook and Twitter as well.” Claire Wardle, the director of First Draft, on March 31, 2015, and weeks prior to Googles offer, became the Tow Centers Research Director. She worked with Tow/Knight previously. Google is partnered with the Knight Foundation. And, it just so happens that Steve Grove and Olivia Ma who started First Draft were frequent visitors to the Obama White House over many years! I even have Steve Grove down for a strategy meeting with Obama less than 3 months before the April 2015 First Draft Consortium inception. ♦️Video #1 - Shows that Steve Grove, the director of Google News Lab, first met Obama at Google while Obama was still a senator. This also shows the multiple projects from multiple time frames that Steve Grove worked with Obama from 2009 to 2016. He’s all over this video. This also shows that Steve Grove worked with Obama during the same time that he and Olivia Ma created the First Draft News global censorship org. ♦️Video # 2 - Shows that Olivia Ma accompanied Steve Grove to the White House on at least one occasion in 2010. These videos may seem boring to you, but to me they are documentation of evidence. Sources to follow.
1:25

❗️❗️Breaking! Google just didn’t seed fund First Draft News, the first major US and global censorship org, it CREATED IT! I also have finally gotten the names of the Google employees they used to start the global censorship in 2015. This was in preparation for the 2016 elections. Yup, the same Google that visited the Obama White House 427 times. And the same Google that helped Obama win both his first and second presidencies! Interestingly, Tim Walz went on to hire one of the two Google individuals, Steve Grove. All along I thought the First Draft News consortium was started on June 18, 2015, when it was announced by Olivia Ma. But actually contact was made in April 2015. I’ve been looking for more specifics on First Drafts origins for years, now I have TWO SOURCES. Also Google expanded its support to include its GLOBAL TEAM. 1. First Draft website: “Most importantly, a final huge thank you to Steve Grove and Olivia Ma at Google News Lab. They got us all in a room in New York in April 2015 and FLOATED THE IDEA of First Draft. Since then, their support and enthusiasm, now combined with the same from their global team, has been invaluable. 2. Google News Lab on Medium - Steve Grove Director of the News Lab at Google. “At the center of our efforts around this topic is the First Draft coalition, WHICH WE STARTED in 2015 with seven social media verification organizations to create standards and best practices in the news industry for verifying eyewitness media content and COMBATTING FAKE NEWS. In 2016, we expanded the coalition to over 80 partners worldwide, and were thrilled to welcome Facebook and Twitter as well.” Claire Wardle, the director of First Draft, on March 31, 2015, and weeks prior to Googles offer, became the Tow Centers Research Director. She worked with Tow/Knight previously. Google is partnered with the Knight Foundation. And, it just so happens that Steve Grove and Olivia Ma who started First Draft were frequent visitors to the Obama White House over many years! I even have Steve Grove down for a strategy meeting with Obama less than 3 months before the April 2015 First Draft Consortium inception. ♦️Video #1 - Shows that Steve Grove, the director of Google News Lab, first met Obama at Google while Obama was still a senator. This also shows the multiple projects from multiple time frames that Steve Grove worked with Obama from 2009 to 2016. He’s all over this video. This also shows that Steve Grove worked with Obama during the same time that he and Olivia Ma created the First Draft News global censorship org. ♦️Video # 2 - Shows that Olivia Ma accompanied Steve Grove to the White House on at least one occasion in 2010. These videos may seem boring to you, but to me they are documentation of evidence. Sources to follow.

Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

138,415 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Dr. Bakri says a Russian peptide cut deaths in nursing home patients over 15 years. If you have an aging parent, this study is worth knowing about. Taking it just ten to twenty days a year lowered death across all major diseases. It was pulled from the pineal gland by Soviet scientist Vladimir Khavinson for his study. In his 15-year study, nursing home patients got a short course once a year, alongside a thymus peptide. "They had significantly lower mortality when it came to cardiovascular disease, infectious risk, and cancers." Deaths from heart disease, infection, and cancer all dropped. A few days of treatment a year, and the benefit carried through the rest of it. It's Russian data, so hold it loosely. But for an old parent, that design is hard to ignore. A handful of days dosed each year, and they still lived longer. That peptide is epitalon. — Dr. Abud Bakri (.Abud Bakri MD) on the Huberman Lab podcast (.Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.)
0:51

Dr. Bakri says a Russian peptide cut deaths in nursing home patients over 15 years. If you have an aging parent, this study is worth knowing about. Taking it just ten to twenty days a year lowered death across all major diseases. It was pulled from the pineal gland by Soviet scientist Vladimir Khavinson for his study. In his 15-year study, nursing home patients got a short course once a year, alongside a thymus peptide. "They had significantly lower mortality when it came to cardiovascular disease, infectious risk, and cancers." Deaths from heart disease, infection, and cancer all dropped. A few days of treatment a year, and the benefit carried through the rest of it. It's Russian data, so hold it loosely. But for an old parent, that design is hard to ignore. A handful of days dosed each year, and they still lived longer. That peptide is epitalon. — Dr. Abud Bakri (.Abud Bakri MD) on the Huberman Lab podcast (.Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.)

Goku

47,226 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Someone on Reddit asked has anyone actually made real money on Polymarket? and one comment led me to a wallet that turned 8 trades into $900,000 profit. The thread had 200+ replies, mostly people sharing their $50 wins and $200 losses, the usual stories about bad beats and lucky streaks that every prediction market attracts. But buried somewhere in the middle, one user dropped a single link without explanation just the wallet address and three words: this guy did. → Wallet: I clicked expecting another account with thousands of trades and a modest profit curve that took years to build. What I found instead made me close the tab, reopen it and stare at the numbers for a solid five minutes trying to understand what I was looking at. $900,091 in profit. Not from grinding hundreds of positions over months of careful risk management. From exactly 8 predictions total. For anyone new to prediction markets, let me put this in perspective most successful traders on Polymarket consider a 60% win rate exceptional and they achieve it across hundreds or thousands of small bets that slowly compound into meaningful profit over time. Maze8 has a 100% win rate across 8 bets averaging over $100,000 each, with a biggest single win of $325,100 that most professional traders will never see in their entire career on the platform. The account was created in January 2026, which means this person walked onto the platform less than a month ago and immediately started placing bets larger than what most people have in their retirement accounts. There is no learning curve visible here, no progression from small test bets to larger positions as confidence builds the very first trades were already six figure commitments made with the certainty of someone who already knew the outcomes. Right now the wallet holds $785,000 in active positions, meaning whoever controls this account extracted nearly a million dollars in profit and then decided that was not enough, loading up again for whatever comes next. I went back to that Reddit thread to find more discussion about this wallet but the comment had maybe 3 upvotes and zero replies. 2,700 people have viewed this profile according to Polymarket, yet somehow the internet has almost nothing to say about a wallet printing money at this rate. The profile remains public, the positions are visible in real time, and every future bet will appear on the blockchain the moment it happens. Eight predictions placed. Eight predictions won. $900,000 extracted while everyone else argued about $50 bets in Reddit comments. Some people discuss prediction markets. Others quietly empty them.
0:55

Someone on Reddit asked has anyone actually made real money on Polymarket? and one comment led me to a wallet that turned 8 trades into $900,000 profit. The thread had 200+ replies, mostly people sharing their $50 wins and $200 losses, the usual stories about bad beats and lucky streaks that every prediction market attracts. But buried somewhere in the middle, one user dropped a single link without explanation just the wallet address and three words: this guy did. → Wallet: I clicked expecting another account with thousands of trades and a modest profit curve that took years to build. What I found instead made me close the tab, reopen it and stare at the numbers for a solid five minutes trying to understand what I was looking at. $900,091 in profit. Not from grinding hundreds of positions over months of careful risk management. From exactly 8 predictions total. For anyone new to prediction markets, let me put this in perspective most successful traders on Polymarket consider a 60% win rate exceptional and they achieve it across hundreds or thousands of small bets that slowly compound into meaningful profit over time. Maze8 has a 100% win rate across 8 bets averaging over $100,000 each, with a biggest single win of $325,100 that most professional traders will never see in their entire career on the platform. The account was created in January 2026, which means this person walked onto the platform less than a month ago and immediately started placing bets larger than what most people have in their retirement accounts. There is no learning curve visible here, no progression from small test bets to larger positions as confidence builds the very first trades were already six figure commitments made with the certainty of someone who already knew the outcomes. Right now the wallet holds $785,000 in active positions, meaning whoever controls this account extracted nearly a million dollars in profit and then decided that was not enough, loading up again for whatever comes next. I went back to that Reddit thread to find more discussion about this wallet but the comment had maybe 3 upvotes and zero replies. 2,700 people have viewed this profile according to Polymarket, yet somehow the internet has almost nothing to say about a wallet printing money at this rate. The profile remains public, the positions are visible in real time, and every future bet will appear on the blockchain the moment it happens. Eight predictions placed. Eight predictions won. $900,000 extracted while everyone else argued about $50 bets in Reddit comments. Some people discuss prediction markets. Others quietly empty them.

Marlow

10,133 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

"If you just compound and stack day after day after day and give it your best, great things will happen. That's been the story of my life and the story of this business." Garrett Lord. Founder & CEO of Handshake. At a Christmas party in December 2024, Garrett met a researcher from a frontier AI lab who told him about the challenges of model training. Two weeks later, Garrett's company Handshake was recruiting STEM PhDs for that same lab. Fifteen months after that, Handshake AI had gone from zero to a billion dollars in gross annualized revenue, and now is the human data engine behind the frontier labs. This conversation is a dissection of the most audacious reinvention in tech. Knuckle Up ↓ -- 00:00 Who is Garrett Lord? 01:36 How did a Christmas party conversation spark Handshake AI? 11:59 How do you tell your execs and board you're refounding the company? 18:18 What keeps A players motivated in the core business? 22:22 Olympic Pace: why did around 100 team members leave Handshake? 27:02 What broke first going zero to a billion in a year? 31:45 How do you protect quality when 85% of the company is new? 39:36 Why hasn't Garrett upgraded a single exec? 49:00 What does the bear case on human data get wrong? 53:30 How do you make accounting verifiable enough for reinforcement learning? 1:00:08 Will enterprises leave the labs for open source? 1:07:13 What does all this mean for knowledge workers? 1:08:51 The inner game: how is Garrett holding it all together? 1:14:22 What's the mission in this new chapter? 1:18:27 Will vertical AI apps survive the frontier labs? 1:21:23 Quickfire: red flags, overrated advice, jobs of the future
1:24:39

"If you just compound and stack day after day after day and give it your best, great things will happen. That's been the story of my life and the story of this business." Garrett Lord. Founder & CEO of Handshake. At a Christmas party in December 2024, Garrett met a researcher from a frontier AI lab who told him about the challenges of model training. Two weeks later, Garrett's company Handshake was recruiting STEM PhDs for that same lab. Fifteen months after that, Handshake AI had gone from zero to a billion dollars in gross annualized revenue, and now is the human data engine behind the frontier labs. This conversation is a dissection of the most audacious reinvention in tech. Knuckle Up ↓ -- 00:00 Who is Garrett Lord? 01:36 How did a Christmas party conversation spark Handshake AI? 11:59 How do you tell your execs and board you're refounding the company? 18:18 What keeps A players motivated in the core business? 22:22 Olympic Pace: why did around 100 team members leave Handshake? 27:02 What broke first going zero to a billion in a year? 31:45 How do you protect quality when 85% of the company is new? 39:36 Why hasn't Garrett upgraded a single exec? 49:00 What does the bear case on human data get wrong? 53:30 How do you make accounting verifiable enough for reinforcement learning? 1:00:08 Will enterprises leave the labs for open source? 1:07:13 What does all this mean for knowledge workers? 1:08:51 The inner game: how is Garrett holding it all together? 1:14:22 What's the mission in this new chapter? 1:18:27 Will vertical AI apps survive the frontier labs? 1:21:23 Quickfire: red flags, overrated advice, jobs of the future

Nakul Mandan

330,468 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

.John Coogan says the recent reporting on Meta's 'tokenmaxxing' is less of a sign of bad incentives at the company, and more of a tell about its potential strategy for more vertical integration: "I think it makes clearer the strategy with MSL. Because it's clear that they're spending hundreds of millions of dollars on this, just for internal code-gen tooling — like, running their business." "They are going to spend an inordinate amount of money on frontier inference, and so [by] training a model there, they will be able to amortize the training cost of the next model they build not just over, 'Can they get a product out that goes viral and becomes its own standalone chat app that people pay for.'" "Just on the internal usage, they could be running a multi-billion-dollar token bill that they would have to pay another lab. And so if they develop that internally, it's pure vertical integration." "And then you also have everything that's happening on the actual ad targeting and content delivery side..." "The big question has been like, 'Is Meta going to be able to launch an entirely new AI product like Vibes or something like that?'" "And this is a data point that, to me, says they don't need to. Because just from a pure vertical integration [perspective], the investment in MSL can pencil out."
1:29

.John Coogan says the recent reporting on Meta's 'tokenmaxxing' is less of a sign of bad incentives at the company, and more of a tell about its potential strategy for more vertical integration: "I think it makes clearer the strategy with MSL. Because it's clear that they're spending hundreds of millions of dollars on this, just for internal code-gen tooling — like, running their business." "They are going to spend an inordinate amount of money on frontier inference, and so [by] training a model there, they will be able to amortize the training cost of the next model they build not just over, 'Can they get a product out that goes viral and becomes its own standalone chat app that people pay for.'" "Just on the internal usage, they could be running a multi-billion-dollar token bill that they would have to pay another lab. And so if they develop that internally, it's pure vertical integration." "And then you also have everything that's happening on the actual ad targeting and content delivery side..." "The big question has been like, 'Is Meta going to be able to launch an entirely new AI product like Vibes or something like that?'" "And this is a data point that, to me, says they don't need to. Because just from a pure vertical integration [perspective], the investment in MSL can pencil out."

TBPN

32,654 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Exposing the Canadian government's espionage cover-up: The shocking truth behind Winnipeg's National Microbiology Lab This is the National Microbiology Lab nestled in Winnipeg, Manitoba. But don't be fooled by its innocuous exterior; within its walls lies a tale of international espionage, government cover-ups, and potential global consequences. This isn't your average research facility. It's Canada's lone Level 4 biolab, equipped to handle the world's deadliest pathogens. However, what sets it apart is its dubious association with Chinese government scientists. Chinese scientists, outside of China, had access to this high security facility. The plot thickens when we delve into the past few years' events, five years in the making, and nearly three years of meticulous cover-up with tendrils into the Prime Minister's office. Shockingly, recent revelations point towards gain-of-function experiments with bat viruses conducted right under our noses. Imagine a lab situated in a regular Winnipeg neighbourhood, just up the street from a high school and nestled among residential areas and government services. The implications should send shivers down your spine. Let's rewind to 2019: Two Chinese nationals, along with their students, were escorted out of the National Microbiology Lab under suspicion of collaborating with the Chinese military. Their misdeeds included transferring deadly pathogens, including Ebola, to the Chinese People's Liberation Army, with samples possibly ending up at the Wuhan Virology Institute. This incident triggered a Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) investigation, the details of which were concealed from the public for three long years. However, the truth is finally emerging. According to investigative reports by Sam Copper at The Bureau, Dr. Xiangguo Qiu, one of the implicated scientists, led a project on synthetic bat filoviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology alongside Dr. Shi Zhengli, ominously dubbed the "bat woman." Their research, purportedly aimed at assessing cross-species infection and pathogenic risks, hints at the controversial gain-of-function studies. But the timeline doesn't end there, in June 2019, amidst the espionage scandal, Dr. Qiu and her husband were stripped of their security clearances for clandestinely removing vials of dangerous pathogens from the lab and sending them to contacts in China. In November 2019, a few months later, the first official clusters of COVID-19 were identified, with the Wuhan Institute of Virology suspected as the genesis of the disease. Meanwhile, CSIS continued its investigation into the Canadian lab's espionage. Once the investigation concluded, bureaucratic stonewalling ensued. Ian Stewart, president of the Public Health Agency of Canada then, refused to disclose the findings to Parliament, earning the dubious honour of being the first federal manager censured in over a century. In a bizarre turn of events, Stewart stepped down. He was subsequently hailed as a hero upon his retirement, conveniently just weeks before Parliament received the damning 600-page report detailing the espionage scandal. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, embroiled in the chaos, resorted to legal maneuvers to block the unredacted release of the CSIS investigation. His actions raise alarming questions about the extent of government complicity or incompetence. Adding fuel to the fire, Trudeau's snap election in August 2021 raised eyebrows—accusations of Chinese government intervention favouring Trudeau's Liberal Party. What exactly transpired within the walls of the National Microbiology Lab? What secrets were Dr. Qiu and her team shipping to the Wuhan Virology Institute, now implicated as the epicentre of the COVID-19 outbreak? And why did Trudeau's government funnel nearly $900,000 to the same institute at the onset of the pandemic? The truth remains hidden, for now, buried beneath layers of bureaucracy and political machinations and scheming. As Canadians demand accountability, one thing is clear: our government's integrity is gone, and our nation's safety is at risk. Sheila Gunn Reid
8:42

Exposing the Canadian government's espionage cover-up: The shocking truth behind Winnipeg's National Microbiology Lab This is the National Microbiology Lab nestled in Winnipeg, Manitoba. But don't be fooled by its innocuous exterior; within its walls lies a tale of international espionage, government cover-ups, and potential global consequences. This isn't your average research facility. It's Canada's lone Level 4 biolab, equipped to handle the world's deadliest pathogens. However, what sets it apart is its dubious association with Chinese government scientists. Chinese scientists, outside of China, had access to this high security facility. The plot thickens when we delve into the past few years' events, five years in the making, and nearly three years of meticulous cover-up with tendrils into the Prime Minister's office. Shockingly, recent revelations point towards gain-of-function experiments with bat viruses conducted right under our noses. Imagine a lab situated in a regular Winnipeg neighbourhood, just up the street from a high school and nestled among residential areas and government services. The implications should send shivers down your spine. Let's rewind to 2019: Two Chinese nationals, along with their students, were escorted out of the National Microbiology Lab under suspicion of collaborating with the Chinese military. Their misdeeds included transferring deadly pathogens, including Ebola, to the Chinese People's Liberation Army, with samples possibly ending up at the Wuhan Virology Institute. This incident triggered a Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) investigation, the details of which were concealed from the public for three long years. However, the truth is finally emerging. According to investigative reports by Sam Copper at The Bureau, Dr. Xiangguo Qiu, one of the implicated scientists, led a project on synthetic bat filoviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology alongside Dr. Shi Zhengli, ominously dubbed the "bat woman." Their research, purportedly aimed at assessing cross-species infection and pathogenic risks, hints at the controversial gain-of-function studies. But the timeline doesn't end there, in June 2019, amidst the espionage scandal, Dr. Qiu and her husband were stripped of their security clearances for clandestinely removing vials of dangerous pathogens from the lab and sending them to contacts in China. In November 2019, a few months later, the first official clusters of COVID-19 were identified, with the Wuhan Institute of Virology suspected as the genesis of the disease. Meanwhile, CSIS continued its investigation into the Canadian lab's espionage. Once the investigation concluded, bureaucratic stonewalling ensued. Ian Stewart, president of the Public Health Agency of Canada then, refused to disclose the findings to Parliament, earning the dubious honour of being the first federal manager censured in over a century. In a bizarre turn of events, Stewart stepped down. He was subsequently hailed as a hero upon his retirement, conveniently just weeks before Parliament received the damning 600-page report detailing the espionage scandal. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, embroiled in the chaos, resorted to legal maneuvers to block the unredacted release of the CSIS investigation. His actions raise alarming questions about the extent of government complicity or incompetence. Adding fuel to the fire, Trudeau's snap election in August 2021 raised eyebrows—accusations of Chinese government intervention favouring Trudeau's Liberal Party. What exactly transpired within the walls of the National Microbiology Lab? What secrets were Dr. Qiu and her team shipping to the Wuhan Virology Institute, now implicated as the epicentre of the COVID-19 outbreak? And why did Trudeau's government funnel nearly $900,000 to the same institute at the onset of the pandemic? The truth remains hidden, for now, buried beneath layers of bureaucracy and political machinations and scheming. As Canadians demand accountability, one thing is clear: our government's integrity is gone, and our nation's safety is at risk. Sheila Gunn Reid

Rebel News

158,014 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Meta’s Chief AI Officer Alexandr Wang just put a five-year countdown on the most consequential race in human history. Wang: “Mark and myself, we very strongly believe that this is a very special time in human history.” Not a decade. Not a generation. Five years. Wang: “The discoveries made over the next half-decade are going to be some of the most monumental discoveries that human civilization has ever made.” To run that race, Meta didn’t just build a new model. They built an entirely new division from scratch. Meta Superintelligence Labs. Designed from a blank slate. Singular focus. Wang: “What does the optimal team look like for the future of superintelligence?” The bottleneck to superintelligence isn’t compute anymore. It isn’t data. It’s the density of human genius in a single room. Wang: “Highest talent density. Bring the very best people together and build the best possible environment for them.” The AI arms race has shifted from hoarding GPUs to hoarding the smartest minds on earth. The first company to perfect that organizational structure will be the first company to reach superintelligence. But reaching it is only half the battle. Deploying what you built to the world is the other half. And here is where Meta’s advantage becomes almost unfair. Wang: “Three and a half billion people utilize our platforms every single day.” While every other AI lab is still trying to figure out how to get users to adopt their technology, Meta already has nearly half the planet locked into their ecosystem. MSL wasn’t built just to achieve scientific breakthroughs. Wang: “Build the products that will enable this technology to be deployed to billions and billions of people worldwide.” Whoever builds superintelligence first wins the race. Whoever distributes it to 3.5 billion people controls what comes after. Meta is positioning to do both.
1:31

Meta’s Chief AI Officer Alexandr Wang just put a five-year countdown on the most consequential race in human history. Wang: “Mark and myself, we very strongly believe that this is a very special time in human history.” Not a decade. Not a generation. Five years. Wang: “The discoveries made over the next half-decade are going to be some of the most monumental discoveries that human civilization has ever made.” To run that race, Meta didn’t just build a new model. They built an entirely new division from scratch. Meta Superintelligence Labs. Designed from a blank slate. Singular focus. Wang: “What does the optimal team look like for the future of superintelligence?” The bottleneck to superintelligence isn’t compute anymore. It isn’t data. It’s the density of human genius in a single room. Wang: “Highest talent density. Bring the very best people together and build the best possible environment for them.” The AI arms race has shifted from hoarding GPUs to hoarding the smartest minds on earth. The first company to perfect that organizational structure will be the first company to reach superintelligence. But reaching it is only half the battle. Deploying what you built to the world is the other half. And here is where Meta’s advantage becomes almost unfair. Wang: “Three and a half billion people utilize our platforms every single day.” While every other AI lab is still trying to figure out how to get users to adopt their technology, Meta already has nearly half the planet locked into their ecosystem. MSL wasn’t built just to achieve scientific breakthroughs. Wang: “Build the products that will enable this technology to be deployed to billions and billions of people worldwide.” Whoever builds superintelligence first wins the race. Whoever distributes it to 3.5 billion people controls what comes after. Meta is positioning to do both.

Dustin

32,982 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a renowned medical researcher, has delved deep into the polio narrative, uncovering startling facts that challenge the mainstream story. Her meticulous investigation reveals that polio never vanished—it was redefined, rebranded, and obscured by shifting diagnostic criteria and environmental toxins. Here’s the truth they don’t want you to know: Redefinition Scam: In the 1940s and 1950s, polio was diagnosed based on clinical symptoms alone. After the polio vaccine’s introduction, the criteria changed dramatically. Testing for the poliovirus became standard, and cases previously labeled as polio were reclassified as Guillain-Barré syndrome, coxsackievirus, echovirus, or even heavy metal poisoning from lead or mercury—common treatments at the time. This sleight of hand created an illusion of a plummeting polio rate, despite more paralytic cases occurring post-vaccine. Toxic Culprits: Pesticides and Heavy Metals: Dr. Humphries highlights the undeniable link between polio-like paralysis and environmental toxins. The rise in DDT production mirrored polio diagnoses, with countries still using DDT today reporting persistent paralytic cases. Early polio outbreaks in rural U.S. communities coincided with widespread arsenic, lead, and mercury use in agriculture—particularly in sheep and cow dipping. Farmers soaked in arsenic-filled trenches, and crops were sprayed with toxic concoctions. These substances, Humphries notes, cause spinal pathology and fevers identical to what was called polio. Polio as a Commensal Virus: Shockingly, 95-99% of poliovirus infections are asymptomatic. Dr. Humphries cites studies of South American tribes, like the Gervonta Indians, where nearly 100% of individuals showed immunity to all three polio strains—yet had no crippled children or respiratory deaths. Poliovirus, she argues, is a commensal—a normal part of the human microbiome, like staph or strep, keeping other microbes in check unless disrupted by external factors like toxins or lab manipulation. Lab-Made Polio Disasters: Dr. Humphries uncovers a chilling 1916 incident in Manhattan, where a Rockefeller lab deliberately engineered a hyper-virulent polio strain by injecting monkey brains and human spinal serum into primates. This strain escaped, triggering the deadliest polio epidemic on record, with a 25% mortality rate. As it spread, it naturally attenuated, proving that poliovirus, left alone, reverts to its benign commensal state. The Natural Evolution of Viruses: Humphries explains that viruses like polio typically become less virulent over time, as seen with COVID’s progression from deadly early strains to the milder, more transmissible Omicron. Polio’s lethality, she argues, was amplified by human interventions—toxic treatments, pesticides, and lab experiments—not the virus itself. The Takeaway: Polio didn’t disappear because of vaccines; it was buried under redefined diagnoses, toxic exposures, and historical sleight of hand. Dr. Humphries’ work demands we rethink the polio narrative and question the role of environmental toxins in neurological diseases today.
6:18

Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a renowned medical researcher, has delved deep into the polio narrative, uncovering startling facts that challenge the mainstream story. Her meticulous investigation reveals that polio never vanished—it was redefined, rebranded, and obscured by shifting diagnostic criteria and environmental toxins. Here’s the truth they don’t want you to know: Redefinition Scam: In the 1940s and 1950s, polio was diagnosed based on clinical symptoms alone. After the polio vaccine’s introduction, the criteria changed dramatically. Testing for the poliovirus became standard, and cases previously labeled as polio were reclassified as Guillain-Barré syndrome, coxsackievirus, echovirus, or even heavy metal poisoning from lead or mercury—common treatments at the time. This sleight of hand created an illusion of a plummeting polio rate, despite more paralytic cases occurring post-vaccine. Toxic Culprits: Pesticides and Heavy Metals: Dr. Humphries highlights the undeniable link between polio-like paralysis and environmental toxins. The rise in DDT production mirrored polio diagnoses, with countries still using DDT today reporting persistent paralytic cases. Early polio outbreaks in rural U.S. communities coincided with widespread arsenic, lead, and mercury use in agriculture—particularly in sheep and cow dipping. Farmers soaked in arsenic-filled trenches, and crops were sprayed with toxic concoctions. These substances, Humphries notes, cause spinal pathology and fevers identical to what was called polio. Polio as a Commensal Virus: Shockingly, 95-99% of poliovirus infections are asymptomatic. Dr. Humphries cites studies of South American tribes, like the Gervonta Indians, where nearly 100% of individuals showed immunity to all three polio strains—yet had no crippled children or respiratory deaths. Poliovirus, she argues, is a commensal—a normal part of the human microbiome, like staph or strep, keeping other microbes in check unless disrupted by external factors like toxins or lab manipulation. Lab-Made Polio Disasters: Dr. Humphries uncovers a chilling 1916 incident in Manhattan, where a Rockefeller lab deliberately engineered a hyper-virulent polio strain by injecting monkey brains and human spinal serum into primates. This strain escaped, triggering the deadliest polio epidemic on record, with a 25% mortality rate. As it spread, it naturally attenuated, proving that poliovirus, left alone, reverts to its benign commensal state. The Natural Evolution of Viruses: Humphries explains that viruses like polio typically become less virulent over time, as seen with COVID’s progression from deadly early strains to the milder, more transmissible Omicron. Polio’s lethality, she argues, was amplified by human interventions—toxic treatments, pesticides, and lab experiments—not the virus itself. The Takeaway: Polio didn’t disappear because of vaccines; it was buried under redefined diagnoses, toxic exposures, and historical sleight of hand. Dr. Humphries’ work demands we rethink the polio narrative and question the role of environmental toxins in neurological diseases today.

Camus

27,711 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce