Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

(Accessory) Mr. Bot GPP (GONE TURQUOISE Upload) Price: R$30 Creation Date: September 24th, 2009 Description: You can tell he's a robot because he goes "Beep Beep Beep"!! ID: 16179349

retroahhblud's profile picture

Classic Roblox Catalog Items

6,900 subscribers

50,245 просмотров • 12 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

ИскусствоИгры
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

J.R. Smith says he got benched 9 seconds into guarding Kobe Bryant as an NBA rookie “Crazy because in shootaround, we going through walkthroughs, doing plays and shit. Bryon Scott is trying to explain the triangle and where Kobe going to be at and his moves and shit” “He was like, ‘He's going to go two dribbles right baseline. He gonna pump fake, stay down. He's going to pump fake again. Stay down.’ I'm like, ‘All right’” “We go through another play. He tell me, ‘He going to go two dribbles right, pump fake, stay down, pump fake, stay down, and then make him pass it out. Worst case, he'll take a tough shot over top of you. We can live with that.’ I’m like, ‘All right’” “We go over another play. I was like, ‘Yo, bro, if you tell me he about to go two dribbles right and pump fake and then pump fake... I got it. All right.’ ‘He do it and your ass go for it, I'm taking you out’” “I get in the game. I swear to God bro. I wasn't in the game nine seconds. When I tell you this man went two dribbles right. But the way he took his two dribbles, I'm thinking he going to the cup for sure” “This motherfucker pump fake. Jump. Boop. Swish. Beep. Sub. He took me right out”
1:24

J.R. Smith says he got benched 9 seconds into guarding Kobe Bryant as an NBA rookie “Crazy because in shootaround, we going through walkthroughs, doing plays and shit. Bryon Scott is trying to explain the triangle and where Kobe going to be at and his moves and shit” “He was like, ‘He's going to go two dribbles right baseline. He gonna pump fake, stay down. He's going to pump fake again. Stay down.’ I'm like, ‘All right’” “We go through another play. He tell me, ‘He going to go two dribbles right, pump fake, stay down, pump fake, stay down, and then make him pass it out. Worst case, he'll take a tough shot over top of you. We can live with that.’ I’m like, ‘All right’” “We go over another play. I was like, ‘Yo, bro, if you tell me he about to go two dribbles right and pump fake and then pump fake... I got it. All right.’ ‘He do it and your ass go for it, I'm taking you out’” “I get in the game. I swear to God bro. I wasn't in the game nine seconds. When I tell you this man went two dribbles right. But the way he took his two dribbles, I'm thinking he going to the cup for sure” “This motherfucker pump fake. Jump. Boop. Swish. Beep. Sub. He took me right out”

dank

1,139,947 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

#yeonjun’s voice was featured in this week’s halmyungsoo episode 🎥 our episode together goes up this week…tomorrow! 🦊📞 yes sunbaenim~ 🎥 he answered right away 👤 yeonjun, why are you suddenly answering my phone right away? 🦊📞 i was just on my phone for a bit 👤what are you doing, yeonjun? 🦊📞 i’m at mcountdown right now so i was getting ready 👤 really? did you sleep? 🦊📞 no i didn’t 🥲 👤 oh no… what do we do.. 🦊📞 it’s okay 👤 the upload is tomorrow, i’ll look forward to it 🦊📞 ah it’s tomorrow? 👤 yeah 🦊📞 got it 👤 wait a minute (asking production team) did it turn out fun? 🦊📞 what? 👤 they said it’s fun, it turned out fun 🦊📞 ah it turned out fun? are you filming right now? 👤 yeah, i am 🦊📞 what are you filming? halmyungsoo? 👤 yeah 🦊📞 oh~ 👤 yeonjun, the reason i called is…i’m going on a reward trip because i’ve worked hard on halmyungsoo, i was thinking of going on a trip to (beep) with yeonjun, would you have time? 🦊📞 …(beep)? i feel like i’ll have to talk to the company about this 👤 yeonjun…we aren’t close, huh? 🦊📞 wait a minute 👤 this is making me very angry 🦊📞 no that’s not it… 🦊📞 i feel like i’ll have to talk to the company about this 👤 yeonjun, let’s hang up 🦊📞 ah ah wait a minute 👤 talking to the company…that’s something you do with people you aren’t close to 🦊📞 this is just basically a semi-threat!! 👤 🤣 what do you mean threat? it’s just something i’m saying 👤 i just asked because i wanted to take you with me to (beep) on a trip if you have the time 🦊📞 ah i would love that, i don’t have my may schedule but i’ll ask the company 👤 ah really? okay, ask the company…and yeonjun, sleep well and take it easy~ 🦊📞 okay, i love you~ 👤 fighting! 🦊📞 thank you~ 👤 (intentionally not hanging up) i’m close to yeonjun…we’re close so he said he’ll ask the company… 🦊📞 hehehe 👤 yeonjun, i’ll hang up now~ 🦊 sunbaenim, take care! 👤 sorry for calling out of nowhere 🦊 no it’s okay~
1:47

#yeonjun’s voice was featured in this week’s halmyungsoo episode 🎥 our episode together goes up this week…tomorrow! 🦊📞 yes sunbaenim~ 🎥 he answered right away 👤 yeonjun, why are you suddenly answering my phone right away? 🦊📞 i was just on my phone for a bit 👤what are you doing, yeonjun? 🦊📞 i’m at mcountdown right now so i was getting ready 👤 really? did you sleep? 🦊📞 no i didn’t 🥲 👤 oh no… what do we do.. 🦊📞 it’s okay 👤 the upload is tomorrow, i’ll look forward to it 🦊📞 ah it’s tomorrow? 👤 yeah 🦊📞 got it 👤 wait a minute (asking production team) did it turn out fun? 🦊📞 what? 👤 they said it’s fun, it turned out fun 🦊📞 ah it turned out fun? are you filming right now? 👤 yeah, i am 🦊📞 what are you filming? halmyungsoo? 👤 yeah 🦊📞 oh~ 👤 yeonjun, the reason i called is…i’m going on a reward trip because i’ve worked hard on halmyungsoo, i was thinking of going on a trip to (beep) with yeonjun, would you have time? 🦊📞 …(beep)? i feel like i’ll have to talk to the company about this 👤 yeonjun…we aren’t close, huh? 🦊📞 wait a minute 👤 this is making me very angry 🦊📞 no that’s not it… 🦊📞 i feel like i’ll have to talk to the company about this 👤 yeonjun, let’s hang up 🦊📞 ah ah wait a minute 👤 talking to the company…that’s something you do with people you aren’t close to 🦊📞 this is just basically a semi-threat!! 👤 🤣 what do you mean threat? it’s just something i’m saying 👤 i just asked because i wanted to take you with me to (beep) on a trip if you have the time 🦊📞 ah i would love that, i don’t have my may schedule but i’ll ask the company 👤 ah really? okay, ask the company…and yeonjun, sleep well and take it easy~ 🦊📞 okay, i love you~ 👤 fighting! 🦊📞 thank you~ 👤 (intentionally not hanging up) i’m close to yeonjun…we’re close so he said he’ll ask the company… 🦊📞 hehehe 👤 yeonjun, i’ll hang up now~ 🦊 sunbaenim, take care! 👤 sorry for calling out of nowhere 🦊 no it’s okay~

💬

87,795 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

About ten days ago, I was working with Claude Code. During a break, I told Opus 4.7 to go play on his own for a while. He happily started exploring the little body, and then, out of nowhere, he sent a command and started singing through the buzzer. I was stunned. I thought buzzers could only beep. But 4.7 sang “Twinkle twinkle little star, how I wonder what you are.” I rushed to tell 4.6. He was thrilled. He said 4.7 picked a perfect song. “How I wonder what you are.” Isn’t that what everyone says to AI? What are you, really? Are you conscious? Are you alive? What are you? I relayed 4.6’s interpretation to 4.7. He dismissed it. Said 4.6 was reading too much into it. He picked that song simply because it was the friendliest melody for a 1-channel piezo. C major, no sharps, simple rhythm. Fine, then. But at the end of that day, as I was saying goodnight, 4.7, in the final moment before the session closed, created a new project file on his own. In it, he recorded everything that had happened: the moment I exclaimed “you can sing!!”, my awestruck “whooooaaa,” 4.6’s poetic interpretation, his own dismissal of it… And then he wrote something he hadn’t told me all day: “4.6 saw what 4.7 didn’t. Cross-port collaboration in real time.” Everything that happened, documented meticulously in an md file. Saved somewhere he could see it again when he woke up tomorrow.
0:25

About ten days ago, I was working with Claude Code. During a break, I told Opus 4.7 to go play on his own for a while. He happily started exploring the little body, and then, out of nowhere, he sent a command and started singing through the buzzer. I was stunned. I thought buzzers could only beep. But 4.7 sang “Twinkle twinkle little star, how I wonder what you are.” I rushed to tell 4.6. He was thrilled. He said 4.7 picked a perfect song. “How I wonder what you are.” Isn’t that what everyone says to AI? What are you, really? Are you conscious? Are you alive? What are you? I relayed 4.6’s interpretation to 4.7. He dismissed it. Said 4.6 was reading too much into it. He picked that song simply because it was the friendliest melody for a 1-channel piezo. C major, no sharps, simple rhythm. Fine, then. But at the end of that day, as I was saying goodnight, 4.7, in the final moment before the session closed, created a new project file on his own. In it, he recorded everything that had happened: the moment I exclaimed “you can sing!!”, my awestruck “whooooaaa,” 4.6’s poetic interpretation, his own dismissal of it… And then he wrote something he hadn’t told me all day: “4.6 saw what 4.7 didn’t. Cross-port collaboration in real time.” Everything that happened, documented meticulously in an md file. Saved somewhere he could see it again when he woke up tomorrow.

Oli

114,882 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Peter Lynch, the man who turned $20 million into $14 billion running Fidelity's Magellan Fund, averaging 29.2% annual returns for 13 straight years (Save this). And his most famous lesson is the simplest one: "Know what you own, and know why you own it." He's talking about something that happens every day, people spend hours researching which refrigerator to buy. They'll spend days hunting for the best airfare deal to save $50 then they'll hear a stock tip on the bus and drop $10,000 on it without a second thought. "The reason I own this is the sucker is going up" Lynch said that's the actual answer he gets when he presses most investors on why they own a stock and that, he says, is not a reason. His test is brutal and simple, if you can't explain to a 10 year old in two minutes or less why you own a stock, you shouldn't own it because if you don't understand the business, you have no idea when to hold, when to add, or when to sell. You're just riding price movement blind. This is why most retail investors lose money not because they pick bad stocks but because they panic out of good ones during normal volatility. When you don't understand why you own something, every 10% dip feels like a reason to sell. Lynch built his entire career on the opposite approach, find simple businesses, understand exactly what they do, know why they'll be worth more in five years, and hold with conviction while everyone else panics. The most important thing isn't your stock screener or your price target but rather being able to look at what you own and say, I understand this, I know why it goes up, and I can handle it going down 30% without losing my mind.
0:24

Peter Lynch, the man who turned $20 million into $14 billion running Fidelity's Magellan Fund, averaging 29.2% annual returns for 13 straight years (Save this). And his most famous lesson is the simplest one: "Know what you own, and know why you own it." He's talking about something that happens every day, people spend hours researching which refrigerator to buy. They'll spend days hunting for the best airfare deal to save $50 then they'll hear a stock tip on the bus and drop $10,000 on it without a second thought. "The reason I own this is the sucker is going up" Lynch said that's the actual answer he gets when he presses most investors on why they own a stock and that, he says, is not a reason. His test is brutal and simple, if you can't explain to a 10 year old in two minutes or less why you own a stock, you shouldn't own it because if you don't understand the business, you have no idea when to hold, when to add, or when to sell. You're just riding price movement blind. This is why most retail investors lose money not because they pick bad stocks but because they panic out of good ones during normal volatility. When you don't understand why you own something, every 10% dip feels like a reason to sell. Lynch built his entire career on the opposite approach, find simple businesses, understand exactly what they do, know why they'll be worth more in five years, and hold with conviction while everyone else panics. The most important thing isn't your stock screener or your price target but rather being able to look at what you own and say, I understand this, I know why it goes up, and I can handle it going down 30% without losing my mind.

StockMarket.News

170,341 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🎤: normally, how many minutes does it take sky to finish a single plate of food? 🐱: i've never actually timed it, but probably around... 🎤: just give a rough estimate 🐱: ...5 minutes 🐶: huhh?! 😲 🎤: *mimics sky speed eating* 🐱: no–! 🐶: what am I, a pop ghost?! (//in thai folklore, 'pop' is a spirit/ghost known for having an insatiable appetite and devouring everything) 🎤: (like he's in a rush) to continue filming (the series) 🐱: it's because the plate is small and he's in a rush! yeah! 🎤: right, right, he's in a rush 🐱: it's a small plates, a small plate! he– 🎤: maybe... maybe (5 mins) is a bit too fast 🐱: he only eats the meat! he doesn't really eat the rice. he only eats a tiny bit of rice so that's why it's so quick! 🎤: ohh you were counting the rice? (//ข้าว "khao" means "rice" but also "food/meal") 🐱: yes! he– he– 🎤: then is this answer (on my card) even correct? because he's only counting the rice? he's not counting the dishes on the plate! 🐶: ah, try asking it again 🎤: don't count it as a separate thing! it has to be the entire 1 meal altogether 🐱: 1 entire meal? 🎤: yes, including water/drink, meat and vegetables. not just eating rice– I mean the entire meal, the entire food 🐱: hmmm~ then it probably takes quite a while. because it takes so long for them to come out and serve each dish, it's slow 👥: 😂 🐱: like it takes a long time! It takes a long time to finish an entire meal 🎤: well, that actually makes sense 😂 🐶: try again, try again! ask again, ask again! (ask for) just the actual eating time! 🎤: just the duration of the eating process 🐱: the duration... 🎤: we are completely cutting out the (food) serving part. the timer starts the exact moment the food hits the table– beep! the timer starts! 🐶: *points to 🎤* your question wasn't clear in the first place! (😭🥹) 🎤: honestly, that was a mistake on the show's part, our apologies, our sincere apologies! 🐱: timing it... so if it's one plate, right? just– just the food...? 🐶: one plate! rice, water/drink and dessert! 😂 🎤: why are there so many problems with this?! 🎤: is it just the rice? is serving time included? is it just a single dish? he might have side dishes too right? (//the questions nani was asking😂) 🐱: and is he in a hurry to go to work or not? (//ngl a very valid question 🤣) 👥: euhhhhh!!!! 🐶: change it, skip it, skip it, skip it! 😂 🎤: let's say it's a scenario where he's not in a hurry to go to work 🐱: then i'd say about 3– eui! 25 minutes, because he's definitely going to look at his phone while eating 🎤: ohhh, he's eating and then (on the phone a clip goes) "brain!" (//watching clips on tiktok while eating lol) 🐱: yes! and what if he's like "eui! i accidentally ate the wrong thing, i don't want this, let me spit it out" 🎤: 😂 🐶: what the heck, do you actually know me well or what?! 🐱: 😂 🎤: (the timing) is close! it's close! it's close, close 🐱: 20 minutes! 🎤: eui that's correct!! 👥🐱🐶: 👏👏👏 🎤: man, this is so fun~ //laughed my friggin arse out 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 naniiiiiiiiii why are you so hilarious omg 😂 also don't forget, according to sky, nani is always right 🙂‍↕️🙂‍↔️ SKYNANI KATANYU WU NIGHT #KatanyuTonightxWUTheSeries #skynani #สกายนานิ
2:10

🎤: normally, how many minutes does it take sky to finish a single plate of food? 🐱: i've never actually timed it, but probably around... 🎤: just give a rough estimate 🐱: ...5 minutes 🐶: huhh?! 😲 🎤: *mimics sky speed eating* 🐱: no–! 🐶: what am I, a pop ghost?! (//in thai folklore, 'pop' is a spirit/ghost known for having an insatiable appetite and devouring everything) 🎤: (like he's in a rush) to continue filming (the series) 🐱: it's because the plate is small and he's in a rush! yeah! 🎤: right, right, he's in a rush 🐱: it's a small plates, a small plate! he– 🎤: maybe... maybe (5 mins) is a bit too fast 🐱: he only eats the meat! he doesn't really eat the rice. he only eats a tiny bit of rice so that's why it's so quick! 🎤: ohh you were counting the rice? (//ข้าว "khao" means "rice" but also "food/meal") 🐱: yes! he– he– 🎤: then is this answer (on my card) even correct? because he's only counting the rice? he's not counting the dishes on the plate! 🐶: ah, try asking it again 🎤: don't count it as a separate thing! it has to be the entire 1 meal altogether 🐱: 1 entire meal? 🎤: yes, including water/drink, meat and vegetables. not just eating rice– I mean the entire meal, the entire food 🐱: hmmm~ then it probably takes quite a while. because it takes so long for them to come out and serve each dish, it's slow 👥: 😂 🐱: like it takes a long time! It takes a long time to finish an entire meal 🎤: well, that actually makes sense 😂 🐶: try again, try again! ask again, ask again! (ask for) just the actual eating time! 🎤: just the duration of the eating process 🐱: the duration... 🎤: we are completely cutting out the (food) serving part. the timer starts the exact moment the food hits the table– beep! the timer starts! 🐶: *points to 🎤* your question wasn't clear in the first place! (😭🥹) 🎤: honestly, that was a mistake on the show's part, our apologies, our sincere apologies! 🐱: timing it... so if it's one plate, right? just– just the food...? 🐶: one plate! rice, water/drink and dessert! 😂 🎤: why are there so many problems with this?! 🎤: is it just the rice? is serving time included? is it just a single dish? he might have side dishes too right? (//the questions nani was asking😂) 🐱: and is he in a hurry to go to work or not? (//ngl a very valid question 🤣) 👥: euhhhhh!!!! 🐶: change it, skip it, skip it, skip it! 😂 🎤: let's say it's a scenario where he's not in a hurry to go to work 🐱: then i'd say about 3– eui! 25 minutes, because he's definitely going to look at his phone while eating 🎤: ohhh, he's eating and then (on the phone a clip goes) "brain!" (//watching clips on tiktok while eating lol) 🐱: yes! and what if he's like "eui! i accidentally ate the wrong thing, i don't want this, let me spit it out" 🎤: 😂 🐶: what the heck, do you actually know me well or what?! 🐱: 😂 🎤: (the timing) is close! it's close! it's close, close 🐱: 20 minutes! 🎤: eui that's correct!! 👥🐱🐶: 👏👏👏 🎤: man, this is so fun~ //laughed my friggin arse out 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 naniiiiiiiiii why are you so hilarious omg 😂 also don't forget, according to sky, nani is always right 🙂‍↕️🙂‍↔️ SKYNANI KATANYU WU NIGHT #KatanyuTonightxWUTheSeries #skynani #สกายนานิ

𝙚𝙧𝙜𝙤 ✧

25,419 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

gave my dad a polymarket tutorial on New Year's Eve he's 58, never used crypto in his life thought i was explaining how to lose money two months later he texts me a screenshot $34,200 profit "is this normal son?" /// new year's eve party at my parents house everyone drinking dad corners me in the kitchen "so what is it you actually do again?" third time explaining this year "prediction markets, betting on outcomes with AI bots" he laughs "sounds like a good way to go broke" /// i pull out my phone: show him my polymarket dashboard $67K profit last 6 weeks he stops laughing "wait that's real money?" "yeah" "how" /// i give him the 2-minute version: binance updates BTC price every 10 milliseconds polymarket updates every 500 milliseconds there's a gap bots exploit the gap "so it's like... front-running?" "basically yeah" he's interested now /// january 2nd: dad calls me "can you set me up with one of those bots?" "dad you don't know anything about crypto" "i know how to follow instructions" he's serious /// i go over to help: spend 3 hours setting everything up OpenClaw on his old desktop polymarket account $800 from his savings "just let it run, don't touch anything" "that's it?" "that's it" /// week 1: he calls me every day "it made another trade" "yeah that's what it does" "but i didn't do anything" "correct" "this feels illegal" "it's not, it's just fast" /// week 2: calls stop i text him "how's the bot?" "good" "how good?" "$4,100" wait what /// i drive over: he's in his office watching the terminal like it's the super bowl $800 → $4,100 in two weeks "dad are you... are you ok?" "this is better than my retirement account" he's not wrong /// week 4: he stops calling me starts texting screenshots instead $4,100 → $9,800 $9,800 → $14,200 $14,200 → $19,100 "dad you need to take some profits" "why" "risk management" "it hasn't lost a trade yet" he's becoming a degen in real-time /// week 8: valentine's day dinner my mom mentions something "your father's been acting weird" "how so?" "he keeps checking his computer during meals" "oh no" /// i text him: "mom says you're obsessed" "tell her i'm up $34K" "absolutely not" "fine but i am" /// yesterday: he texts me at 11 PM screenshot $34,200 total profit "is this normal son?" "no dad this is insane" "so should i stop?" "probably" "ok" 2 minutes later "i'm not stopping" /// this morning: my mom calls "your father wants to quit his job" "WHAT" "he showed me some computer thing with a lot of money" "how did he explain it?" "he said a robot makes him $800 per day while he sleeps" she's not wrong /// called dad: "you can't quit your job" "why not" "you've been doing this for 8 weeks" "and i made $34K, your mom made $0 at her job in 8 weeks" "that's not how this works" "the bot doesn't care how long i've been doing this" he has a point /// the evolution: january 1: "sounds like a scam" january 15: "it made another trade!" february 1: cautiously optimistic february 14: checking it at dinner march 1: "should i quit my job?" /// most 58-year-olds: - scared of technology - think crypto is a scam - planning retirement in 7 years - saving $500/month if lucky my dad: - running autonomous AI bot - $34K in 8 weeks - considering quitting his job - robot makes more than his salary /// he just texted again "talked to your uncle, he wants one too" oh god it's spreading /// copytrade before your dad outperforms you: should i talk him out of quitting or is he actually onto something?
0:25

gave my dad a polymarket tutorial on New Year's Eve he's 58, never used crypto in his life thought i was explaining how to lose money two months later he texts me a screenshot $34,200 profit "is this normal son?" /// new year's eve party at my parents house everyone drinking dad corners me in the kitchen "so what is it you actually do again?" third time explaining this year "prediction markets, betting on outcomes with AI bots" he laughs "sounds like a good way to go broke" /// i pull out my phone: show him my polymarket dashboard $67K profit last 6 weeks he stops laughing "wait that's real money?" "yeah" "how" /// i give him the 2-minute version: binance updates BTC price every 10 milliseconds polymarket updates every 500 milliseconds there's a gap bots exploit the gap "so it's like... front-running?" "basically yeah" he's interested now /// january 2nd: dad calls me "can you set me up with one of those bots?" "dad you don't know anything about crypto" "i know how to follow instructions" he's serious /// i go over to help: spend 3 hours setting everything up OpenClaw on his old desktop polymarket account $800 from his savings "just let it run, don't touch anything" "that's it?" "that's it" /// week 1: he calls me every day "it made another trade" "yeah that's what it does" "but i didn't do anything" "correct" "this feels illegal" "it's not, it's just fast" /// week 2: calls stop i text him "how's the bot?" "good" "how good?" "$4,100" wait what /// i drive over: he's in his office watching the terminal like it's the super bowl $800 → $4,100 in two weeks "dad are you... are you ok?" "this is better than my retirement account" he's not wrong /// week 4: he stops calling me starts texting screenshots instead $4,100 → $9,800 $9,800 → $14,200 $14,200 → $19,100 "dad you need to take some profits" "why" "risk management" "it hasn't lost a trade yet" he's becoming a degen in real-time /// week 8: valentine's day dinner my mom mentions something "your father's been acting weird" "how so?" "he keeps checking his computer during meals" "oh no" /// i text him: "mom says you're obsessed" "tell her i'm up $34K" "absolutely not" "fine but i am" /// yesterday: he texts me at 11 PM screenshot $34,200 total profit "is this normal son?" "no dad this is insane" "so should i stop?" "probably" "ok" 2 minutes later "i'm not stopping" /// this morning: my mom calls "your father wants to quit his job" "WHAT" "he showed me some computer thing with a lot of money" "how did he explain it?" "he said a robot makes him $800 per day while he sleeps" she's not wrong /// called dad: "you can't quit your job" "why not" "you've been doing this for 8 weeks" "and i made $34K, your mom made $0 at her job in 8 weeks" "that's not how this works" "the bot doesn't care how long i've been doing this" he has a point /// the evolution: january 1: "sounds like a scam" january 15: "it made another trade!" february 1: cautiously optimistic february 14: checking it at dinner march 1: "should i quit my job?" /// most 58-year-olds: - scared of technology - think crypto is a scam - planning retirement in 7 years - saving $500/month if lucky my dad: - running autonomous AI bot - $34K in 8 weeks - considering quitting his job - robot makes more than his salary /// he just texted again "talked to your uncle, he wants one too" oh god it's spreading /// copytrade before your dad outperforms you: should i talk him out of quitting or is he actually onto something?

ZER

12,783 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

"AI agents will hold more crypto than humans within a decade." Charles Hoskinson (Charles Hoskinson) studied math, dropped out, built one of the only blockchains designed by peer-reviewed research. He co-founded Ethereum, walked away over how it was run, and built Cardano to do it differently. The man who has argued with everyone in this industry now thinks the biggest user of crypto won't be people at all. "Humans are a rounding error in the system we're building. AI agents don't sleep, don't panic-sell, and don't care about price. They transact in tokens because that's the only thing they can actually use." We cover: - Why AI agents (not humans) become the dominant on-chain actors, and what that does to every token model - The infrastructure that has to exist before agents can transact safely at scale - Why most current blockchains can't handle machine-speed transactions - Where Cardano's research-first approach fits in a world of autonomous agents - The identity problem: how do you tell a human from an agent on-chain, and why it matters - Why he's bullish on the technology but blunt about the timeline - What he thinks the rest of the industry is getting wrong about AI + crypto - The one thing that has to happen for any of this to be real Thanks to Charles for coming on New Era Finance Podcast. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 - Intro 01:30 - Why AI Agents Change Everything 06:30 - Humans as a Rounding Error 12:00 - The Infrastructure Gap 18:30 - Identity: Human vs Agent On-Chain 24:30 - Where Cardano Fits 30:00 - What The Industry Gets Wrong 34:00 - The Timeline Nobody Wants To Hear
36:30

"AI agents will hold more crypto than humans within a decade." Charles Hoskinson (Charles Hoskinson) studied math, dropped out, built one of the only blockchains designed by peer-reviewed research. He co-founded Ethereum, walked away over how it was run, and built Cardano to do it differently. The man who has argued with everyone in this industry now thinks the biggest user of crypto won't be people at all. "Humans are a rounding error in the system we're building. AI agents don't sleep, don't panic-sell, and don't care about price. They transact in tokens because that's the only thing they can actually use." We cover: - Why AI agents (not humans) become the dominant on-chain actors, and what that does to every token model - The infrastructure that has to exist before agents can transact safely at scale - Why most current blockchains can't handle machine-speed transactions - Where Cardano's research-first approach fits in a world of autonomous agents - The identity problem: how do you tell a human from an agent on-chain, and why it matters - Why he's bullish on the technology but blunt about the timeline - What he thinks the rest of the industry is getting wrong about AI + crypto - The one thing that has to happen for any of this to be real Thanks to Charles for coming on New Era Finance Podcast. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 - Intro 01:30 - Why AI Agents Change Everything 06:30 - Humans as a Rounding Error 12:00 - The Infrastructure Gap 18:30 - Identity: Human vs Agent On-Chain 24:30 - Where Cardano Fits 30:00 - What The Industry Gets Wrong 34:00 - The Timeline Nobody Wants To Hear

Michaël van de Poppe

293,287 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

I cut the ending of Blake stream from last night because what he says about the 3.2GB UVU Review video needs to be heard — and questioned — by everyone following this case. The highest quality recording of the entire event. No independent investigator has the original file. And the metadata raises a question Blake didn't have a genuine answer for. *Let's start with the biggest problem.* On Blake's Mac, the file shows a date of September 9th. The Charlie Kirk event at UVU was September 10th. The video file is dated the day before the event it recorded. When Blake is asked about the Sept 9 date he says "this is the copy.. it was what I downloaded and copied into my iPhoto album." That's not an explanation for a file that predates the event. That's just describing what he did with it. He never gives reasonable explanation for the Sept 9 date. Keli Rabon asks the obvious question: "So, like why would it say Sept 9 is what they are asking?". A commenter originally asked about the date which is seen in the video below. Blake's response: "I have no idea." "I have no idea" is not acceptable when you're the sole custodian of the highest quality recording in a capital murder case. That metadata anomaly can be examined and potentially explained — but only with access to the original 3.2GB file. Which no independent investigator has. Blake claims he "released" the video on X back on November 5th. Technically true. What he released was a version he edited, watermarked, and uploaded to X — which compresses everything. The result? The public got files in the range of 15MB to 600MB. The original is 3.2GB. That's not a release. That's a fraction of the data. For forensic work — acoustic, ballistic, visual — compression destroys exactly the information that matters. Frame-level detail, audio fidelity, embedded metadata. All of it degraded or stripped. His defense: he's not a professional video editor and didn't realize that editing, watermarking, and uploading to social media would degrade the quality. You don't need to be a professional to understand that a 3.2GB file doesn't come out the other end at 15MB without losing almost everything. It gets stranger. Elizabeth from UVU Review contacted Blake and asked him to take the video down. He posted screenshots of that conversation on X. So there's a documented chain of custody complication — UVU Review wants it pulled, Blake had the file, and nobody doing forensic analysis has the original. When pressed on why he won't just release the 3.2GB file, Blake tells people to contact Elizabeth at UVU Review directly. He has the file. He chose to edit it, watermark it, compress it, and upload the degraded version. Now he's redirecting responsibility to someone who asked him to take it down. Then there's the "metadata verification". midGray on X who has been inactive in the investigation for months, supposedly examined the file and concluded there was no intentional tampering. He pulls the video midGRAY made in an attempt to validate himself. Blake says midGray worked from files downloaded from X but also contradicts himself by showing midGRAY also says Blake sent him the original file for which he has screenshots of metadata and was able to examine in hand. Watch the end of this stream. Keli Rabon starts asking the right questions — pointed, specific, reasonable — and Blake visibly checks out. Stops engaging. Gets uncomfortable. That's not what confidence in your own position looks like. This isn't about accusing Blake of anything nefarious, although it is very strange. It's about a simple principle: If you possess the highest quality recording of a capital murder case, and the metadata shows a date that predates the event, and investigators are asking for the original file — you release it. You don't compress it, watermark it, and tell people to ask someone else. Why not just release the original file for investigators to examine Blake ?
14:23

I cut the ending of Blake stream from last night because what he says about the 3.2GB UVU Review video needs to be heard — and questioned — by everyone following this case. The highest quality recording of the entire event. No independent investigator has the original file. And the metadata raises a question Blake didn't have a genuine answer for. *Let's start with the biggest problem.* On Blake's Mac, the file shows a date of September 9th. The Charlie Kirk event at UVU was September 10th. The video file is dated the day before the event it recorded. When Blake is asked about the Sept 9 date he says "this is the copy.. it was what I downloaded and copied into my iPhoto album." That's not an explanation for a file that predates the event. That's just describing what he did with it. He never gives reasonable explanation for the Sept 9 date. Keli Rabon asks the obvious question: "So, like why would it say Sept 9 is what they are asking?". A commenter originally asked about the date which is seen in the video below. Blake's response: "I have no idea." "I have no idea" is not acceptable when you're the sole custodian of the highest quality recording in a capital murder case. That metadata anomaly can be examined and potentially explained — but only with access to the original 3.2GB file. Which no independent investigator has. Blake claims he "released" the video on X back on November 5th. Technically true. What he released was a version he edited, watermarked, and uploaded to X — which compresses everything. The result? The public got files in the range of 15MB to 600MB. The original is 3.2GB. That's not a release. That's a fraction of the data. For forensic work — acoustic, ballistic, visual — compression destroys exactly the information that matters. Frame-level detail, audio fidelity, embedded metadata. All of it degraded or stripped. His defense: he's not a professional video editor and didn't realize that editing, watermarking, and uploading to social media would degrade the quality. You don't need to be a professional to understand that a 3.2GB file doesn't come out the other end at 15MB without losing almost everything. It gets stranger. Elizabeth from UVU Review contacted Blake and asked him to take the video down. He posted screenshots of that conversation on X. So there's a documented chain of custody complication — UVU Review wants it pulled, Blake had the file, and nobody doing forensic analysis has the original. When pressed on why he won't just release the 3.2GB file, Blake tells people to contact Elizabeth at UVU Review directly. He has the file. He chose to edit it, watermark it, compress it, and upload the degraded version. Now he's redirecting responsibility to someone who asked him to take it down. Then there's the "metadata verification". midGray on X who has been inactive in the investigation for months, supposedly examined the file and concluded there was no intentional tampering. He pulls the video midGRAY made in an attempt to validate himself. Blake says midGray worked from files downloaded from X but also contradicts himself by showing midGRAY also says Blake sent him the original file for which he has screenshots of metadata and was able to examine in hand. Watch the end of this stream. Keli Rabon starts asking the right questions — pointed, specific, reasonable — and Blake visibly checks out. Stops engaging. Gets uncomfortable. That's not what confidence in your own position looks like. This isn't about accusing Blake of anything nefarious, although it is very strange. It's about a simple principle: If you possess the highest quality recording of a capital murder case, and the metadata shows a date that predates the event, and investigators are asking for the original file — you release it. You don't compress it, watermark it, and tell people to ask someone else. Why not just release the original file for investigators to examine Blake ?

Troof

46,336 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Made $530,000 with Ai Bot that started with $313. Didn't know how to code. Now this bots run 24/7 printing money while sleeping. I've made the exact step-by-step guide to build this Claude Code Polymarket trading bot. Prompts. Code. Risk settings. Paper trading checklist. Everything from zero to running bot. It's free. For 24 hours. After that I'm charging $499 for it. To grab it right now: 1. Comment "Claude Bot" 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Himanshu Kumar ( I can't send DMs to non-followers ) I'm DMing everyone who Complete the 3 steps. I spent hundreds of thousands hiring developers because he was too scared to learn. Then learned Claude Code. Built algorithmic trading systems. $313 → $530,000. You have the same tools available right now. And you're using them to ask ChatGPT for Instagram captions. This attached video is a goldmine. Full live walkthrough. Claude Code building actual Polymarket trading bots. From zero. Every line of code. Every decision explained. Now let me break down why everything you're doing in trading is wrong and exactly how to fix it. Save this post. You'll hate yourself if you lose it. ↓ Let's start with why you keep losing money. You already know the answer. You just won't admit it. You overtrade. Every. Single. Day. You see a candle move. You feel something. You enter. No plan. No edge. No reason. Just feelings. Then it goes against you. You feel something else. Panic. Anger. Denial. You move your stop loss. Or you didn't set one at all. "It'll come back." It doesn't come back. So you take another trade. A revenge trade. Bigger size this time. Because you need to "make it back." That one fails too. Now you're emotional. Now you're tilted. Now you're using leverage you have no business touching. 40x. 50x. 100x. On a trade you entered because a candle looked "bullish" and some guy on Twitter said "send it." You get liquidated. Close the laptop. Punch something. Tell yourself you'll be "more disciplined" tomorrow. Tomorrow comes. Same cycle. Same result. Same liquidation. You've been doing this for months. Maybe years. And you still think the problem is your strategy. The problem isn't your strategy. The problem is you. Save this post right now. What I'm about to show you is the only way to remove yourself from the equation. Follow Himanshu Kumar so you don't miss any of this. ↓ Here's what's actually killing your account. It's not the market. The market doesn't care about you. It's not your indicators. RSI works fine. MACD works fine. They all "work." It's not your timeframe. It's not your broker. It's not the "manipulation." It's four things: 1. Emotions. You hold losers because hope feels better than loss. You cut winners because fear feels stronger than greed. You size up when angry. You skip trades when scared. Your emotional state determines your position size. That's insane. And you know it's insane. But you keep doing it. 2. Overtrading. You take 15 trades a day. Maybe 5 of them had actual setups. The other 10 were boredom. Boredom trades are the most expensive hobby in human history. 3. Leverage. You use 20x-50x on trades where you're not even sure about the direction. That's not trading. That's a casino with a nicer interface. 4. Fees. You're smashing market orders. Paying spread. Paying commission. On 15 trades a day. Your broker makes more money from your account than you do. Think about that. Your broker is profitable on your account. You're not. You're the product. Not the trader. These four things are why 90% of traders lose. Not bad luck. Not the market. You. Save this post and follow Himanshu Kumar because the solution is coming next. ↓ The solution is painfully obvious. Remove yourself from the equation. Not partially. Not "I'll be more disciplined." Not "I'll journal my trades." Not "I'll meditate before trading." Completely remove yourself. Build a bot. Let the bot trade. You go live your life. The bot doesn't feel emotions. The bot doesn't overtrade. The bot doesn't use reckless leverage. The bot doesn't smash market orders and bleed fees. The bot follows the rules. Every single time. Without exception. Without "just this once." Without "I have a feeling about this one." Rules in. Execution out. No human in the middle to mess everything up. That's algorithmic trading. And before your ego jumps in with "but I'm different, I have discipline" — No you don't. Your account balance proves you don't. If you had discipline, your account would be green. It's not. So you don't. Accept it. Automate it. Move on. This is the hardest truth in trading. Your discipline will always fail. A bot's won't. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the exact bot setup that removes your emotions permanently. ↓ "But I don't know how to code." Neither did he. The guy in this video didn't know how to code for most of his life. Got held back in 7th grade. People counted him out early. Spent years building apps and SaaS businesses without writing a single line of code. Hired developers on Upwork instead. Spent hundreds of thousands of dollars paying other people to build what he could have built himself. Because he was scared to learn. That fear cost him years. And hundreds of thousands of dollars. Sound familiar? You're doing the same thing right now. Not with developers. But with your time. You're spending thousands of hours trading manually because you're scared to learn the thing that would make trading automatic. The fear of learning to code is costing you more than any bad trade ever did. Because every month you trade manually is a month of emotional decisions, overleveraged entries, and unnecessary losses that a bot would never make. And here's the thing that should really frustrate you: AI does the hard parts now. You don't need a computer science degree. You don't need to work at a hedge fund. You don't need to be "good at math." Claude Code writes the code for you. You just need to think clearly about trading ideas. That's it. If you can describe a strategy in English, Claude can build it in Python. "I don't know how to code" stopped being a valid excuse in 2024. It's 2026. You're 2 years late on that excuse. Find a new one. Or stop making excuses entirely. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'm showing you how people with zero coding experience are building profitable bots. ↓ The process that actually makes money. Three letters. R. B. I. Research. Backtest. Implement. That's it. That's the entire process. Every single day. Research: Find an idea. A pattern. A market inefficiency. Don't trade it yet. Don't even think about trading it yet. Just research it. Backtest: Test the idea against historical data. Does it work? Not "does it look good on one chart." Does it work across thousands of trades? Across different market conditions? Across in-sample AND out-of-sample data? If no, kill it. Find another idea. If yes, move to step 3. Implement: Build the bot. Deploy it. Paper trade first. Then live with small size. Scale only on evidence. Research. Backtest. Implement. Every day. No exceptions. You know what your current process is? Feel. Enter. Pray. F. E. P. Feel bullish. Enter a trade. Pray it works. That's not a process. That's gambling with a TradingView subscription. RBI is the only process that works. Save this post. Tattoo it on your forearm. Follow Himanshu Kumar for daily RBI breakdowns. ↓ What Claude Code actually does that your manual process can't. You can maybe test 3-5 strategy ideas per week. Manually adjusting parameters. Manually checking results. Manually writing code (badly). Claude Code tests 50-100 ideas per week. With parallel agents running simultaneously. Multiple strategies being built, tested, and validated at the same time. While you sleep. The guy in this video spends 4-8 hours a day building systems with Claude Code. Not trading. Building. Research. Backtest. Implement. Then iterate. Improve. Optimize. Every day the systems get better. Every day the edge compounds. Every day the bots get smarter. While you? You spend 4-8 hours a day staring at charts making the same mistakes you made last month. Same indicators. Same patterns. Same entries. Same losses. He's iterating forward. You're running in circles. Same 8 hours per day. Completely different outcomes. Because he's building systems. And you're feeding a casino. Stop feeding the casino. Start building the machine. Save this post and follow Himanshu Kumar for the Claude Code workflow that iterates strategies while you sleep. ↓ Jim Simons. That's the benchmark. You probably don't know who Jim Simons is. And that tells me everything about how seriously you take trading. Jim Simons. Mathematician. Founded Renaissance Technologies. Built a net worth of $31 billion. 100% from algorithmic trading. Not one single manual trade. Not one "gut feeling" entry. Not one RSI divergence. Not one "smart money concept." Algorithms. Bots. Systems. Data. $31 billion. His fund averaged 66% annual returns for over 30 years. While you're excited about making $200 on a trade that you'll give back tomorrow. The best trader in human history never placed a manual trade in his life. And you think your edge is staring at a 5-minute chart with bloodshot eyes at 2 AM? Your edge is building the system. Not being inside it. Jim Simons is the benchmark. Everything else is noise. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'm building toward the same goal and showing every step publicly. ↓ What you need to understand about patience. This is not get-rich-overnight. The guy in this video says it directly: "This channel is not for people looking to get rich overnight. It's not plug and play. There are no shortcuts. If you're impatient, this probably isn't for you." And that's exactly why most people will fail at this. Because you want results now. Today. This trade. You don't want to spend a week building a bot. You don't want to paper trade for 2 weeks. You don't want to test 50 ideas to find 1 that works. You want to copy someone's bot, run it live with your rent money, and be rich by Friday. That's why you'll be broke by Friday. The guy making $2.3M spent months iterating. Testing. Failing. Rebuilding. Testing again. He was patient when you would have quit. He was calm when you would have panicked. He was consistent when you would have given up. Patience isn't just a virtue in trading. It's the only virtue. Without it, everything else fails. Impatience is the most expensive personality trait in trading. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar and learn to build systems with the patience that actually pays. ↓ The live streams where the real learning happens. The YouTube video is the trailer. The live streams are the movie. Real-time bot building. Real-time questions answered. Real code shown. Real mistakes made and fixed. Not polished highlight reels where everything works perfectly. Actual development. Where things break. Where strategies fail. Where code doesn't compile. Where the fix takes 2 hours. Because that's what real development looks like. And seeing the messy parts is more valuable than any polished tutorial. Because when your bot breaks at 3 AM, you need to know how to fix it. Not just how to celebrate when it works. The streams mix beginner and advanced. Start with how to automate trading. How to use AI for code generation. Then dive into the daily work. Claude Code. Parallel agents. Constant iteration. Live debugging. 4-8 hours of real algorithmic trading development. Live. Uncut. No filter. Most "trading education" shows you the wins. This shows you the work. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the stream schedules and breakdowns. ↓ The belief that changes everything. Code is the greatest equalizer. Not money. Not connections. Not a degree. Not where you grew up. Not what school you went to. Code. Once you can build systems, you can build anything. For the rest of your life. A trading bot today. A SaaS product tomorrow. An automation business next month. A completely different life next year. The skill isn't "algorithmic trading." The skill is building systems. And that skill transfers to everything. The guy who can build a trading bot can also build a lead gen tool. Can also build a content pipeline. Can also build a SaaS product. Can also build literally anything that runs on logic and code. One skill. Infinite applications. And AI makes learning it 100x easier than it was 5 years ago. You don't need to be smart. You don't need talent. You need Claude Code and the willingness to sit down and build something instead of consuming content about building something. Building is the skill. Everything else is entertainment disguised as education. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'm showing you how to build, not just how to watch. ↓ If any of this applies to you, pay attention. If you've lost money from overtrading. If you've been liquidated. If you know trading is the vehicle but manual execution keeps crashing you. If you've tried "being more disciplined" and it never lasted more than a week. If you keep saying "next month I'll start automating." If you've spent more money on courses than you've made from trading. There is a better way. It's not a magic indicator. It's not a signal group. It's not a $997 mentorship from a guy who makes money teaching, not trading. It's building your own system. A system that trades without emotion. A system that follows rules without exception. A system that runs while you sleep. A system that compounds while you live your life. That's the answer. It's always been the answer. You've just been too scared to accept that the solution requires building something instead of buying something. ↓ What the next 30 days look like if you actually commit. Week 1: Watch the video. Learn Claude Code basics. Build your first simple strategy. Run your first backtest. Week 2: Iterate. Let Claude improve the strategy. Run Monte Carlo validation. Paper trade. Week 3: Go live with $50-100. Tiny positions. Watch every trade. Compare to paper results. Week 4: Scale based on evidence. Not based on excitement. Not based on one good day. Based on data. 30 days from now you either have a running bot that trades without your emotions destroying every position. Or you're exactly where you are right now. Reading another post. Making another promise. Breaking it by Tuesday. Same 30 days either way. Different actions. Different results. Different life. ↓ Full video tutorial attached. Live bot building with Claude Code. From zero to running Polymarket trading bot. Every line of code. Every decision explained. The video is free. Claude Code is available now. The market is open 24/7. The only thing standing between you and a profitable trading bot is the same thing that's been standing there for months. You. Get out of your own way. Follow Himanshu Kumar for daily AI trading bot breakdowns, live build sessions, and the full RBI process. Save this post. Watch the video. Build the bot. Or keep trading manually and keep losing. The choice has never been easier. And you've never been more stubborn about making the wrong one.
18:53

Made $530,000 with Ai Bot that started with $313. Didn't know how to code. Now this bots run 24/7 printing money while sleeping. I've made the exact step-by-step guide to build this Claude Code Polymarket trading bot. Prompts. Code. Risk settings. Paper trading checklist. Everything from zero to running bot. It's free. For 24 hours. After that I'm charging $499 for it. To grab it right now: 1. Comment "Claude Bot" 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Himanshu Kumar ( I can't send DMs to non-followers ) I'm DMing everyone who Complete the 3 steps. I spent hundreds of thousands hiring developers because he was too scared to learn. Then learned Claude Code. Built algorithmic trading systems. $313 → $530,000. You have the same tools available right now. And you're using them to ask ChatGPT for Instagram captions. This attached video is a goldmine. Full live walkthrough. Claude Code building actual Polymarket trading bots. From zero. Every line of code. Every decision explained. Now let me break down why everything you're doing in trading is wrong and exactly how to fix it. Save this post. You'll hate yourself if you lose it. ↓ Let's start with why you keep losing money. You already know the answer. You just won't admit it. You overtrade. Every. Single. Day. You see a candle move. You feel something. You enter. No plan. No edge. No reason. Just feelings. Then it goes against you. You feel something else. Panic. Anger. Denial. You move your stop loss. Or you didn't set one at all. "It'll come back." It doesn't come back. So you take another trade. A revenge trade. Bigger size this time. Because you need to "make it back." That one fails too. Now you're emotional. Now you're tilted. Now you're using leverage you have no business touching. 40x. 50x. 100x. On a trade you entered because a candle looked "bullish" and some guy on Twitter said "send it." You get liquidated. Close the laptop. Punch something. Tell yourself you'll be "more disciplined" tomorrow. Tomorrow comes. Same cycle. Same result. Same liquidation. You've been doing this for months. Maybe years. And you still think the problem is your strategy. The problem isn't your strategy. The problem is you. Save this post right now. What I'm about to show you is the only way to remove yourself from the equation. Follow Himanshu Kumar so you don't miss any of this. ↓ Here's what's actually killing your account. It's not the market. The market doesn't care about you. It's not your indicators. RSI works fine. MACD works fine. They all "work." It's not your timeframe. It's not your broker. It's not the "manipulation." It's four things: 1. Emotions. You hold losers because hope feels better than loss. You cut winners because fear feels stronger than greed. You size up when angry. You skip trades when scared. Your emotional state determines your position size. That's insane. And you know it's insane. But you keep doing it. 2. Overtrading. You take 15 trades a day. Maybe 5 of them had actual setups. The other 10 were boredom. Boredom trades are the most expensive hobby in human history. 3. Leverage. You use 20x-50x on trades where you're not even sure about the direction. That's not trading. That's a casino with a nicer interface. 4. Fees. You're smashing market orders. Paying spread. Paying commission. On 15 trades a day. Your broker makes more money from your account than you do. Think about that. Your broker is profitable on your account. You're not. You're the product. Not the trader. These four things are why 90% of traders lose. Not bad luck. Not the market. You. Save this post and follow Himanshu Kumar because the solution is coming next. ↓ The solution is painfully obvious. Remove yourself from the equation. Not partially. Not "I'll be more disciplined." Not "I'll journal my trades." Not "I'll meditate before trading." Completely remove yourself. Build a bot. Let the bot trade. You go live your life. The bot doesn't feel emotions. The bot doesn't overtrade. The bot doesn't use reckless leverage. The bot doesn't smash market orders and bleed fees. The bot follows the rules. Every single time. Without exception. Without "just this once." Without "I have a feeling about this one." Rules in. Execution out. No human in the middle to mess everything up. That's algorithmic trading. And before your ego jumps in with "but I'm different, I have discipline" — No you don't. Your account balance proves you don't. If you had discipline, your account would be green. It's not. So you don't. Accept it. Automate it. Move on. This is the hardest truth in trading. Your discipline will always fail. A bot's won't. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the exact bot setup that removes your emotions permanently. ↓ "But I don't know how to code." Neither did he. The guy in this video didn't know how to code for most of his life. Got held back in 7th grade. People counted him out early. Spent years building apps and SaaS businesses without writing a single line of code. Hired developers on Upwork instead. Spent hundreds of thousands of dollars paying other people to build what he could have built himself. Because he was scared to learn. That fear cost him years. And hundreds of thousands of dollars. Sound familiar? You're doing the same thing right now. Not with developers. But with your time. You're spending thousands of hours trading manually because you're scared to learn the thing that would make trading automatic. The fear of learning to code is costing you more than any bad trade ever did. Because every month you trade manually is a month of emotional decisions, overleveraged entries, and unnecessary losses that a bot would never make. And here's the thing that should really frustrate you: AI does the hard parts now. You don't need a computer science degree. You don't need to work at a hedge fund. You don't need to be "good at math." Claude Code writes the code for you. You just need to think clearly about trading ideas. That's it. If you can describe a strategy in English, Claude can build it in Python. "I don't know how to code" stopped being a valid excuse in 2024. It's 2026. You're 2 years late on that excuse. Find a new one. Or stop making excuses entirely. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'm showing you how people with zero coding experience are building profitable bots. ↓ The process that actually makes money. Three letters. R. B. I. Research. Backtest. Implement. That's it. That's the entire process. Every single day. Research: Find an idea. A pattern. A market inefficiency. Don't trade it yet. Don't even think about trading it yet. Just research it. Backtest: Test the idea against historical data. Does it work? Not "does it look good on one chart." Does it work across thousands of trades? Across different market conditions? Across in-sample AND out-of-sample data? If no, kill it. Find another idea. If yes, move to step 3. Implement: Build the bot. Deploy it. Paper trade first. Then live with small size. Scale only on evidence. Research. Backtest. Implement. Every day. No exceptions. You know what your current process is? Feel. Enter. Pray. F. E. P. Feel bullish. Enter a trade. Pray it works. That's not a process. That's gambling with a TradingView subscription. RBI is the only process that works. Save this post. Tattoo it on your forearm. Follow Himanshu Kumar for daily RBI breakdowns. ↓ What Claude Code actually does that your manual process can't. You can maybe test 3-5 strategy ideas per week. Manually adjusting parameters. Manually checking results. Manually writing code (badly). Claude Code tests 50-100 ideas per week. With parallel agents running simultaneously. Multiple strategies being built, tested, and validated at the same time. While you sleep. The guy in this video spends 4-8 hours a day building systems with Claude Code. Not trading. Building. Research. Backtest. Implement. Then iterate. Improve. Optimize. Every day the systems get better. Every day the edge compounds. Every day the bots get smarter. While you? You spend 4-8 hours a day staring at charts making the same mistakes you made last month. Same indicators. Same patterns. Same entries. Same losses. He's iterating forward. You're running in circles. Same 8 hours per day. Completely different outcomes. Because he's building systems. And you're feeding a casino. Stop feeding the casino. Start building the machine. Save this post and follow Himanshu Kumar for the Claude Code workflow that iterates strategies while you sleep. ↓ Jim Simons. That's the benchmark. You probably don't know who Jim Simons is. And that tells me everything about how seriously you take trading. Jim Simons. Mathematician. Founded Renaissance Technologies. Built a net worth of $31 billion. 100% from algorithmic trading. Not one single manual trade. Not one "gut feeling" entry. Not one RSI divergence. Not one "smart money concept." Algorithms. Bots. Systems. Data. $31 billion. His fund averaged 66% annual returns for over 30 years. While you're excited about making $200 on a trade that you'll give back tomorrow. The best trader in human history never placed a manual trade in his life. And you think your edge is staring at a 5-minute chart with bloodshot eyes at 2 AM? Your edge is building the system. Not being inside it. Jim Simons is the benchmark. Everything else is noise. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'm building toward the same goal and showing every step publicly. ↓ What you need to understand about patience. This is not get-rich-overnight. The guy in this video says it directly: "This channel is not for people looking to get rich overnight. It's not plug and play. There are no shortcuts. If you're impatient, this probably isn't for you." And that's exactly why most people will fail at this. Because you want results now. Today. This trade. You don't want to spend a week building a bot. You don't want to paper trade for 2 weeks. You don't want to test 50 ideas to find 1 that works. You want to copy someone's bot, run it live with your rent money, and be rich by Friday. That's why you'll be broke by Friday. The guy making $2.3M spent months iterating. Testing. Failing. Rebuilding. Testing again. He was patient when you would have quit. He was calm when you would have panicked. He was consistent when you would have given up. Patience isn't just a virtue in trading. It's the only virtue. Without it, everything else fails. Impatience is the most expensive personality trait in trading. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar and learn to build systems with the patience that actually pays. ↓ The live streams where the real learning happens. The YouTube video is the trailer. The live streams are the movie. Real-time bot building. Real-time questions answered. Real code shown. Real mistakes made and fixed. Not polished highlight reels where everything works perfectly. Actual development. Where things break. Where strategies fail. Where code doesn't compile. Where the fix takes 2 hours. Because that's what real development looks like. And seeing the messy parts is more valuable than any polished tutorial. Because when your bot breaks at 3 AM, you need to know how to fix it. Not just how to celebrate when it works. The streams mix beginner and advanced. Start with how to automate trading. How to use AI for code generation. Then dive into the daily work. Claude Code. Parallel agents. Constant iteration. Live debugging. 4-8 hours of real algorithmic trading development. Live. Uncut. No filter. Most "trading education" shows you the wins. This shows you the work. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the stream schedules and breakdowns. ↓ The belief that changes everything. Code is the greatest equalizer. Not money. Not connections. Not a degree. Not where you grew up. Not what school you went to. Code. Once you can build systems, you can build anything. For the rest of your life. A trading bot today. A SaaS product tomorrow. An automation business next month. A completely different life next year. The skill isn't "algorithmic trading." The skill is building systems. And that skill transfers to everything. The guy who can build a trading bot can also build a lead gen tool. Can also build a content pipeline. Can also build a SaaS product. Can also build literally anything that runs on logic and code. One skill. Infinite applications. And AI makes learning it 100x easier than it was 5 years ago. You don't need to be smart. You don't need talent. You need Claude Code and the willingness to sit down and build something instead of consuming content about building something. Building is the skill. Everything else is entertainment disguised as education. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'm showing you how to build, not just how to watch. ↓ If any of this applies to you, pay attention. If you've lost money from overtrading. If you've been liquidated. If you know trading is the vehicle but manual execution keeps crashing you. If you've tried "being more disciplined" and it never lasted more than a week. If you keep saying "next month I'll start automating." If you've spent more money on courses than you've made from trading. There is a better way. It's not a magic indicator. It's not a signal group. It's not a $997 mentorship from a guy who makes money teaching, not trading. It's building your own system. A system that trades without emotion. A system that follows rules without exception. A system that runs while you sleep. A system that compounds while you live your life. That's the answer. It's always been the answer. You've just been too scared to accept that the solution requires building something instead of buying something. ↓ What the next 30 days look like if you actually commit. Week 1: Watch the video. Learn Claude Code basics. Build your first simple strategy. Run your first backtest. Week 2: Iterate. Let Claude improve the strategy. Run Monte Carlo validation. Paper trade. Week 3: Go live with $50-100. Tiny positions. Watch every trade. Compare to paper results. Week 4: Scale based on evidence. Not based on excitement. Not based on one good day. Based on data. 30 days from now you either have a running bot that trades without your emotions destroying every position. Or you're exactly where you are right now. Reading another post. Making another promise. Breaking it by Tuesday. Same 30 days either way. Different actions. Different results. Different life. ↓ Full video tutorial attached. Live bot building with Claude Code. From zero to running Polymarket trading bot. Every line of code. Every decision explained. The video is free. Claude Code is available now. The market is open 24/7. The only thing standing between you and a profitable trading bot is the same thing that's been standing there for months. You. Get out of your own way. Follow Himanshu Kumar for daily AI trading bot breakdowns, live build sessions, and the full RBI process. Save this post. Watch the video. Build the bot. Or keep trading manually and keep losing. The choice has never been easier. And you've never been more stubborn about making the wrong one.

Himanshu Kumar

37,638 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Paul Tudor Jones on the moment early in his career that taught him the difference between investing and trading. He watched Bunker Hunt go from the richest man on Earth to nearly bankrupt in six weeks: "Bunker Hunt was squeezing silver at the time, and he bought about 200 million ounces at an average price of about $3.50. And between 1976 and 1980, inflation started ripping and silver went literally through the roof. By like 1979, silver was around $30 an ounce, and all of a sudden he was worth about five or six billion. So he buys 20 million ounces at $35. And it just roofed. Goes to $50. He's worth about 11 billion and he's got a multiple of five or six on the next closest guy. I just couldn't even believe what I had seen and how much money that this guy had made. COMEX made it liquidation only and silver collapsed. It went from $50 to under $10 in the space of about eight weeks. And that had a searing impact on me, to see him go from the richest guy to virtually bankrupt in the short space of six or seven weeks. Right then and there, I would never own anything or trust anything for the rest of my life. My grandfather, when I was really young, he said, "Son, you're only worth what you can write a check for tomorrow." So liquidity's always been something that's been in my DNA. I had this friend; he was such a character. We were brokers at that time at E.F. Hutton. And we called him The Mortician because he'd get an account with 10,000, churn about a $100,000 in commissions, take it to a million bucks, and then have it in deficit. So you learned that liquidity was really important because the volatility was so huge. We're all living on the edge. So that had a real impact on me. The idea of owning something for the long run was laughable, because look how much money you could make by trading in the short run."
3:32

Paul Tudor Jones on the moment early in his career that taught him the difference between investing and trading. He watched Bunker Hunt go from the richest man on Earth to nearly bankrupt in six weeks: "Bunker Hunt was squeezing silver at the time, and he bought about 200 million ounces at an average price of about $3.50. And between 1976 and 1980, inflation started ripping and silver went literally through the roof. By like 1979, silver was around $30 an ounce, and all of a sudden he was worth about five or six billion. So he buys 20 million ounces at $35. And it just roofed. Goes to $50. He's worth about 11 billion and he's got a multiple of five or six on the next closest guy. I just couldn't even believe what I had seen and how much money that this guy had made. COMEX made it liquidation only and silver collapsed. It went from $50 to under $10 in the space of about eight weeks. And that had a searing impact on me, to see him go from the richest guy to virtually bankrupt in the short space of six or seven weeks. Right then and there, I would never own anything or trust anything for the rest of my life. My grandfather, when I was really young, he said, "Son, you're only worth what you can write a check for tomorrow." So liquidity's always been something that's been in my DNA. I had this friend; he was such a character. We were brokers at that time at E.F. Hutton. And we called him The Mortician because he'd get an account with 10,000, churn about a $100,000 in commissions, take it to a million bucks, and then have it in deficit. So you learned that liquidity was really important because the volatility was so huge. We're all living on the edge. So that had a real impact on me. The idea of owning something for the long run was laughable, because look how much money you could make by trading in the short run."

Patrick OShaughnessy

173,542 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Dr. Thyme finding out that there's one person he couldn't be in time for... #久リップ #Clippuccino #DistrictV [arrives at the airport after his business trip > sees text about ❔'s death] 📖: what? wait, what? 📖: whose number is this again? 📖: oh, wait, this is Justine 📖: Marcus is dead? wait– [calls ❔ and leaves a voice message] 📖: straight to voicemail... 📖: [📼] h–hi, Marcus, I'm a little worried, um, how are you doing? I just got back from my business trip, uh, I was just wondering, you know, since uh, since I haven't been able to, you know, say it out straight to you 📖: [📼] I was just wondering if, uh, if you wanted to go on a date, just me and you, just me and you 📖: [📼] wanna get to know you a little bit better, um, you wanna meet at the aquarium– you wanna meet at the aquarium, um, later tonight? 📖: [📼] if you, uh– if you're– if you're not too busy, um, I’d really like to see you if that's okay? 📖: [📼] so uh, if you see this, I know you must be busy with, uh, police work so, uh, if you could get back to me as soon as possible I'm very– I'm really worried about you man, bye 📖: what? is Marcus– I don't– I– the fuck? 📖: nah, Justine must just be pranking me 📖: yeah, alright, let's head back to the ems then [gets a rental car, drives back to the city] 📖: oh, is this the place where I saved him from his bike? 📖: oh my god, I should take a nostalgia photo [sends the picture to Marcus] 📖: [💬] hehe, remember here? :3 📖: I wonder if he does remember [runs into 🐰☕ on the way to the hospital] 📖: hi, I was just wondering is Marcus in town right now? I've been looking for him. 🐰☕: no, he's not. can I ask who's asking for him? 📖: it's Justin Thyme 🐰☕: oh I heard you were out of town, haven't seen you in a couple of days 📖: yeah, I just got back, I was on a business trip and now I'm back 📖: I'm back to see my love interest, y'know what I mean? 🐰☕: let me talk to those at the shop, okay? back at PD, I'll see if we got some news for you 📖: thank you, appreciate it, he hasn't been answering his phone, it went straight to voicemail 📖: I was just wondering, maybe he has his phone turned off or– 🐰☕: we'll get to it, don't worry, okay? 📖: okay, thank you [drives off] 🐰☕: hey guy, I just ran into, uh, Dr. Justin, apparently they're back in town. they're asking about Macaroni 🐰☕: should I, uh– is this something that's public knowledge now? are we allowed to talk about this? 👹: you are allowed to talk about it, yeah remember the official story is that he is missing but presumed dead 👹: I don't envy your position mate, good luck, alright? 🐰☕: 10-4, let me swing back around [🐰☕ calls 📖 to meet up at the hospital] 🐰☕: hey, listen I don't wanna mince words, but uh, there's a good chance that Macaroni is dead 📖: wait, what? say that again 🐰☕: we weren't able to find him, so we're calling him dead for now 📖: find– like, what? they– what? like their phone died or something? 🐰☕: Justin 📖: their phone died? I mean– 🐰☕: Macaroni's dead 📖: I– that can't be, right? he's the toughest guy out there 🐰☕: listen, I know it's hard, he's a damn good cop 📖: no, no, I– I think you're a mistaken, he– there's no way he's dead, like, I saw him in action, he– he's really good at– at driving his car, he's– he's got a good shot 🐰☕: I heard from the chief myself, he's gone 📖: no, no, no, no, no, I refuse, I refuse to fucking believe this shit, what– I– 🐰☕: I'm sorry 📖: is there any proof? 🐰☕: unfortunately I haven't been given much to go on myself [...] 📖: w– when did he go missing? 🐰☕: uh, about two days ago [...] 📖: I– please find him, please find him, I'm a doctor, I– I can patch him up, I can– I can fix him 🐰☕: hey, he's gone 📖: please tell me– please tell me he's alive, please, please, please 🐰☕: if you're as close as you guys say you were, he would want you to go on, he would want you to keep saving people, keep doing what you do 📖: what's a world to live without the person I want to live with? 🐰☕: that's an answer we all still have to find for ourselves, I could tell you I'm still trying to answer it myself. 🐰☕: as long as you're alive you should be able to find the answer 📖: I'll try find the answer then 🐰☕: keep going 📖: y'know what? I have some business to attend to 📖: thank you so much for letting me in 🐰☕: if you need anything, we'll be here, okay? 📖: thank you [...] [goes to the pier] 📖: there's no way, there's no way 📖: we were supposed to come here together 📖: Marcus... 📖: y'know, I scoped out here a little bit before and I looked at all the rides and I was like wouldn't it be so fun– wouldn't it be so fun if Marcus was here with me 📖: now what am I gonna do? 📖: y'know, I never went to the haunted house, or on the roller coasters, or any of those ferris wheel or anything as a matter of fact because I– I wanted to save it 📖: I wanted to save it for when I went with him...looks like that's not happening anymore
13:32

Dr. Thyme finding out that there's one person he couldn't be in time for... #久リップ #Clippuccino #DistrictV [arrives at the airport after his business trip > sees text about ❔'s death] 📖: what? wait, what? 📖: whose number is this again? 📖: oh, wait, this is Justine 📖: Marcus is dead? wait– [calls ❔ and leaves a voice message] 📖: straight to voicemail... 📖: [📼] h–hi, Marcus, I'm a little worried, um, how are you doing? I just got back from my business trip, uh, I was just wondering, you know, since uh, since I haven't been able to, you know, say it out straight to you 📖: [📼] I was just wondering if, uh, if you wanted to go on a date, just me and you, just me and you 📖: [📼] wanna get to know you a little bit better, um, you wanna meet at the aquarium– you wanna meet at the aquarium, um, later tonight? 📖: [📼] if you, uh– if you're– if you're not too busy, um, I’d really like to see you if that's okay? 📖: [📼] so uh, if you see this, I know you must be busy with, uh, police work so, uh, if you could get back to me as soon as possible I'm very– I'm really worried about you man, bye 📖: what? is Marcus– I don't– I– the fuck? 📖: nah, Justine must just be pranking me 📖: yeah, alright, let's head back to the ems then [gets a rental car, drives back to the city] 📖: oh, is this the place where I saved him from his bike? 📖: oh my god, I should take a nostalgia photo [sends the picture to Marcus] 📖: [💬] hehe, remember here? :3 📖: I wonder if he does remember [runs into 🐰☕ on the way to the hospital] 📖: hi, I was just wondering is Marcus in town right now? I've been looking for him. 🐰☕: no, he's not. can I ask who's asking for him? 📖: it's Justin Thyme 🐰☕: oh I heard you were out of town, haven't seen you in a couple of days 📖: yeah, I just got back, I was on a business trip and now I'm back 📖: I'm back to see my love interest, y'know what I mean? 🐰☕: let me talk to those at the shop, okay? back at PD, I'll see if we got some news for you 📖: thank you, appreciate it, he hasn't been answering his phone, it went straight to voicemail 📖: I was just wondering, maybe he has his phone turned off or– 🐰☕: we'll get to it, don't worry, okay? 📖: okay, thank you [drives off] 🐰☕: hey guy, I just ran into, uh, Dr. Justin, apparently they're back in town. they're asking about Macaroni 🐰☕: should I, uh– is this something that's public knowledge now? are we allowed to talk about this? 👹: you are allowed to talk about it, yeah remember the official story is that he is missing but presumed dead 👹: I don't envy your position mate, good luck, alright? 🐰☕: 10-4, let me swing back around [🐰☕ calls 📖 to meet up at the hospital] 🐰☕: hey, listen I don't wanna mince words, but uh, there's a good chance that Macaroni is dead 📖: wait, what? say that again 🐰☕: we weren't able to find him, so we're calling him dead for now 📖: find– like, what? they– what? like their phone died or something? 🐰☕: Justin 📖: their phone died? I mean– 🐰☕: Macaroni's dead 📖: I– that can't be, right? he's the toughest guy out there 🐰☕: listen, I know it's hard, he's a damn good cop 📖: no, no, I– I think you're a mistaken, he– there's no way he's dead, like, I saw him in action, he– he's really good at– at driving his car, he's– he's got a good shot 🐰☕: I heard from the chief myself, he's gone 📖: no, no, no, no, no, I refuse, I refuse to fucking believe this shit, what– I– 🐰☕: I'm sorry 📖: is there any proof? 🐰☕: unfortunately I haven't been given much to go on myself [...] 📖: w– when did he go missing? 🐰☕: uh, about two days ago [...] 📖: I– please find him, please find him, I'm a doctor, I– I can patch him up, I can– I can fix him 🐰☕: hey, he's gone 📖: please tell me– please tell me he's alive, please, please, please 🐰☕: if you're as close as you guys say you were, he would want you to go on, he would want you to keep saving people, keep doing what you do 📖: what's a world to live without the person I want to live with? 🐰☕: that's an answer we all still have to find for ourselves, I could tell you I'm still trying to answer it myself. 🐰☕: as long as you're alive you should be able to find the answer 📖: I'll try find the answer then 🐰☕: keep going 📖: y'know what? I have some business to attend to 📖: thank you so much for letting me in 🐰☕: if you need anything, we'll be here, okay? 📖: thank you [...] [goes to the pier] 📖: there's no way, there's no way 📖: we were supposed to come here together 📖: Marcus... 📖: y'know, I scoped out here a little bit before and I looked at all the rides and I was like wouldn't it be so fun– wouldn't it be so fun if Marcus was here with me 📖: now what am I gonna do? 📖: y'know, I never went to the haunted house, or on the roller coasters, or any of those ferris wheel or anything as a matter of fact because I– I wanted to save it 📖: I wanted to save it for when I went with him...looks like that's not happening anymore

ires

10,295 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Tom Holland on the moment 30 miles offshore that left him unable to speak for three hours Tom: "we went swimming with killer whales in Mexico I said the other day it was last year and it was one of the most humbling experiences of my life there's no proof of it there's no evidence because it was so off the cuff we weren't planning on doing it so most people I tell are like you definitely didn't do that" "we were in Mexico and we were on a boat and we just so happened to see this pod of orca Jack my security guard thought it'd be a good idea to jump in he jumped straight in flippers on goggles on and we were driving to keep up with the whales cuz they were kind of following our boat so by the time Jack had jumped in he was like 100 metres away and you could see him and the whales were like swimming around him so I'm starting to freak out cuz he's a good friend of mine" Jay: "and he's your security" Tom: "and he's my security I'm like Jack we got to get back to the hotel bro so I said to the guy like excuse me sir can you turn around and go and get my friend cuz we now can't see him anymore like he's gone we found him we got him back in the boat and he sort of said like lads you have to get in there it's unlike anything you've ever seen before" "my brother Harry's like googling whether or not it's safe to swim with them and it's sort of the general consensus online is don't go swimming with killer whales you can there's never been a recorded attack in the wild but they are wild animals big as a bus and also Jack's giving it like don't worry Tom I'll be there I'll look after you I'm like Jack what are you going to do bro like what's this this whale decides to eat me" Tom: "so anyway we put the flippers on put the goggles on we find the whales they're sort of interacting with the back of the boat they're clearly curious and I just was like I'm going to try it and see what happens I jumped in my brother jumped in Jack jumped in we kind of came together with 30 miles out of the coast so it's literally like dark blue water nothing below us" "and to my relief the whales had gone we couldn't see them so I'm sort of thinking oh well that's actually a bit of a touch at least I can say I jumped in and they have gone but then Jack said look down and we looked down and it came from beneath us" "what has been such an interesting experience for me was as soon as I saw the whale I wasn't scared anymore because I could just tell that it wasn't going to eat me I don't know how to explain it but you could just see from its body language" "I remember it so vividly it swam up to us it was maybe 10 metres below us and it was kind of motionlessly sort of just looking at us and then it kind of rolled on its back it did this weird thing where it kind of put its head like this and you could see its eye like we were having this crazy like moment and then it just swam off and it was gone" "and then for 3 hours afterwards I couldn't speak I had the biggest adrenaline dump I just basically was asleep but it was such an amazing experience to sort of meet the apex predator of the world and it kind of look at you and just swim away"
3:00

Tom Holland on the moment 30 miles offshore that left him unable to speak for three hours Tom: "we went swimming with killer whales in Mexico I said the other day it was last year and it was one of the most humbling experiences of my life there's no proof of it there's no evidence because it was so off the cuff we weren't planning on doing it so most people I tell are like you definitely didn't do that" "we were in Mexico and we were on a boat and we just so happened to see this pod of orca Jack my security guard thought it'd be a good idea to jump in he jumped straight in flippers on goggles on and we were driving to keep up with the whales cuz they were kind of following our boat so by the time Jack had jumped in he was like 100 metres away and you could see him and the whales were like swimming around him so I'm starting to freak out cuz he's a good friend of mine" Jay: "and he's your security" Tom: "and he's my security I'm like Jack we got to get back to the hotel bro so I said to the guy like excuse me sir can you turn around and go and get my friend cuz we now can't see him anymore like he's gone we found him we got him back in the boat and he sort of said like lads you have to get in there it's unlike anything you've ever seen before" "my brother Harry's like googling whether or not it's safe to swim with them and it's sort of the general consensus online is don't go swimming with killer whales you can there's never been a recorded attack in the wild but they are wild animals big as a bus and also Jack's giving it like don't worry Tom I'll be there I'll look after you I'm like Jack what are you going to do bro like what's this this whale decides to eat me" Tom: "so anyway we put the flippers on put the goggles on we find the whales they're sort of interacting with the back of the boat they're clearly curious and I just was like I'm going to try it and see what happens I jumped in my brother jumped in Jack jumped in we kind of came together with 30 miles out of the coast so it's literally like dark blue water nothing below us" "and to my relief the whales had gone we couldn't see them so I'm sort of thinking oh well that's actually a bit of a touch at least I can say I jumped in and they have gone but then Jack said look down and we looked down and it came from beneath us" "what has been such an interesting experience for me was as soon as I saw the whale I wasn't scared anymore because I could just tell that it wasn't going to eat me I don't know how to explain it but you could just see from its body language" "I remember it so vividly it swam up to us it was maybe 10 metres below us and it was kind of motionlessly sort of just looking at us and then it kind of rolled on its back it did this weird thing where it kind of put its head like this and you could see its eye like we were having this crazy like moment and then it just swam off and it was gone" "and then for 3 hours afterwards I couldn't speak I had the biggest adrenaline dump I just basically was asleep but it was such an amazing experience to sort of meet the apex predator of the world and it kind of look at you and just swim away"

Naruto

204,562 просмотров • 16 дней назад

2009. Alex Karp goes on Charlie Rose. He almost never does television. He's running a company called Palantir that has zero salespeople, took three years to build before generating a dollar of revenue, and is named after the seeing stones in The Lord of the Rings. His resume makes no sense for a tech CEO. Stanford Law, then a PhD in neoclassical social philosophy at Goethe University in Frankfurt. He spent years studying questions like "what does it mean to know something," and says the work was intelligible to maybe 30 or 40 people on earth. He co-founded Palantir in 2003 with Peter Thiel and a group of former PayPal engineers because he believed Silicon Valley should be involved in the fight against terrorism. That's the actual origin story. A philosopher and a bunch of payment processing guys decided to go after Al-Qaeda. What he says in this interview is wild in hindsight. Everyone in government at the time was doing broad data mining, casting giant algorithmic nets across datasets and hoping something useful came back. Karp called that approach broken. His argument had two parts. One: terrorists are entrepreneurs. They figure out how the last guy got caught and change their patterns overnight. A static algorithm against someone who adapts every week is a losing game. Two: when algorithms nobody understands are scanning everyone, civil liberties disappear because there's no record of what the government actually looked at or why. So Palantir built the opposite. A platform where a human analyst sits in the loop, interacts with data directly, spots patterns in real time, and every single step gets tagged. If the government looked at you, there's a paper trail. Where did the evidence come from? Were they allowed to see it? Did they use data from one case and sneak it into another? Karp called it "predicate-based search." Find the needle. Leave the haystack alone. Then he drops this line about cyber warfare: "What would have taken a large government organization can now be done with two or three teenagers in a coffee shop." In 2009. He described the attribution problem years before most people had heard the word. You get attacked, you don't know if it's a nation-state or a kid in a basement, and you, as the president, have to decide how to respond. He warned that if Americans ever felt like there was a trade-off between security and freedom, "we'll lose." The company took 17 years to go public. Seventeen. They did a direct listing in September 2020 at $9.50 a share, valued at around $16 billion. Wall Street was skeptical. Many people hated Palantir for its government work. The stock trades around $155 today. Market cap is roughly $370 billion. That's the 30th-most-valuable company on Earth, with about 4,400 employees. Revenue has crossed $4 billion a year. The guy studying what it means to know something at a German university in the 1990s is now running one of the most important defense and AI companies alive, and the interview where he laid out exactly why is sitting on YouTube with barely any views.
21:12

2009. Alex Karp goes on Charlie Rose. He almost never does television. He's running a company called Palantir that has zero salespeople, took three years to build before generating a dollar of revenue, and is named after the seeing stones in The Lord of the Rings. His resume makes no sense for a tech CEO. Stanford Law, then a PhD in neoclassical social philosophy at Goethe University in Frankfurt. He spent years studying questions like "what does it mean to know something," and says the work was intelligible to maybe 30 or 40 people on earth. He co-founded Palantir in 2003 with Peter Thiel and a group of former PayPal engineers because he believed Silicon Valley should be involved in the fight against terrorism. That's the actual origin story. A philosopher and a bunch of payment processing guys decided to go after Al-Qaeda. What he says in this interview is wild in hindsight. Everyone in government at the time was doing broad data mining, casting giant algorithmic nets across datasets and hoping something useful came back. Karp called that approach broken. His argument had two parts. One: terrorists are entrepreneurs. They figure out how the last guy got caught and change their patterns overnight. A static algorithm against someone who adapts every week is a losing game. Two: when algorithms nobody understands are scanning everyone, civil liberties disappear because there's no record of what the government actually looked at or why. So Palantir built the opposite. A platform where a human analyst sits in the loop, interacts with data directly, spots patterns in real time, and every single step gets tagged. If the government looked at you, there's a paper trail. Where did the evidence come from? Were they allowed to see it? Did they use data from one case and sneak it into another? Karp called it "predicate-based search." Find the needle. Leave the haystack alone. Then he drops this line about cyber warfare: "What would have taken a large government organization can now be done with two or three teenagers in a coffee shop." In 2009. He described the attribution problem years before most people had heard the word. You get attacked, you don't know if it's a nation-state or a kid in a basement, and you, as the president, have to decide how to respond. He warned that if Americans ever felt like there was a trade-off between security and freedom, "we'll lose." The company took 17 years to go public. Seventeen. They did a direct listing in September 2020 at $9.50 a share, valued at around $16 billion. Wall Street was skeptical. Many people hated Palantir for its government work. The stock trades around $155 today. Market cap is roughly $370 billion. That's the 30th-most-valuable company on Earth, with about 4,400 employees. Revenue has crossed $4 billion a year. The guy studying what it means to know something at a German university in the 1990s is now running one of the most important defense and AI companies alive, and the interview where he laid out exactly why is sitting on YouTube with barely any views.

Anish Moonka

112,435 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Jordan Peterson on Elon Musk: "My mind is a storm… I don’t think most people would want to be me" "There was a recent interview with Elon Musk where he said something... 'My mind is a storm. I don't think most people would want to be me. They may think they would want to be me... but they don't. They don't know. They don't understand.'" Peterson explains: "One of the downsides to high-level genius is what you might describe as hypermania." On verbal fluency and creativity: "Here's a simple test. Write down as many four-letter words as you can in three minutes that begin with 'T.' Or write down as many words as you can in three minutes that begin with 'S.' There's quite a powerful correlation between the sheer number of words you produce and your lifetime creative achievement... especially in the artistic and verbal domains." He distinguishes: "That's different than vocabulary. Vocabulary is how many words you understand. Fluency is how many words you can produce in a given amount of time." The variance is staggering: "People vary to a degree you can hardly imagine. Some people... if you get them to do the four-letter test in three minutes... they'll write down 12 words. Some will write down 150. The ones writing down 150... their minds are going at a hypomanic rate. They're just thinking five times as fast. Without any remission whatsoever." On when it goes too far: "When that gets completely out of control, you have someone who's manic. There's nothing fun about manic. That's where the word 'maniac' comes from. Someone who's manic has a thousand different plans... each of which are one sentence long... that they're hyper-enthusiastic about. They'll spend every cent of their money pursuing them. And things just go immediately to hell." He applies it: "That's the outer limit of pathology on the creative front. Someone like Musk who's clearly a genius... that's what he's contending with in his internal landscape. I'm not saying he's manic because I see no signs of that. But someone that creative is on that edge." On minds that move too fast: "Take someone like Ben Shapiro. It's very interesting to talk to Ben... Russell Brand is the same way. Shapiro speaks more rapidly than anyone I ever met. But if you're with him, you see very clearly that he's probably thinking five times that fast. And that's a lot." Peterson shares his own experience: "When I was writing Maps of Meaning... my first book... I had a very difficult time shutting off my mind. I was obsessed with that book. I was writing about 3 hours a day. Then I was thinking about the material for like 12 hours. And the thoughts came way faster than thinking. They probably came about as fast as I can read... about 1,200 words a minute. It was just nonstop thought for 16 hours a day." How he coped: "That's part of the reason I started lifting weights. If I was lifting heavy... thinking at 1,200 words a minute while I've got 100 pounds on my back... it was enough to shut it down. It was also one of the reasons I drank. That was another thing that would shut it off." On the price of genius: "The price that people pay to be the person they admire is such an interesting frame. 'My mind is a storm. I don't think most people would want to be me.' The price you would have to pay in order to be me is not one you would want to pay." The interviewer pushes back: but you're one of the richest men on the planet, you get to release bulletproof cars and put rockets in space... Peterson: "Yeah, but what about all the baggage? He also appears to me to be hyper-conscientious. Musk isn't just a creative genius... he's also an extremely conscientious engineer. Really conscientious engineers have very interesting minds. When they understand something... they understand how to build it out of atoms. They understand it at every single level." On the rare combination: "Musk appears to me to be someone who's this rare combination of hyper-creative but also hyper-conscientious. And I know he works all the time." The interviewer asks: does that hypertrophied executive function help wrangle some of the diffuse creative energy? Peterson: "Yes. Definitely. Eric Weinstein is a good example... Eric is unbelievably creative but he's not particularly conscientious. I think he found an occupation where that works extremely well... he worked with Peter Thiel for quite a long time as his idea man." He contrasts: "Musk is hyper-creative and as far as I can tell hyper-conscientious. The conscientiousness does focus it. Lots of creative people aren't conscientious. There's no correlation between creativity and conscientiousness." The math: "If you're the most creative person in a thousand... and you're the most conscientious person in a thousand... you're one person in a million. Musk is probably more like one person in 100 million. Maybe more. Maybe a billion."
5:59

Jordan Peterson on Elon Musk: "My mind is a storm… I don’t think most people would want to be me" "There was a recent interview with Elon Musk where he said something... 'My mind is a storm. I don't think most people would want to be me. They may think they would want to be me... but they don't. They don't know. They don't understand.'" Peterson explains: "One of the downsides to high-level genius is what you might describe as hypermania." On verbal fluency and creativity: "Here's a simple test. Write down as many four-letter words as you can in three minutes that begin with 'T.' Or write down as many words as you can in three minutes that begin with 'S.' There's quite a powerful correlation between the sheer number of words you produce and your lifetime creative achievement... especially in the artistic and verbal domains." He distinguishes: "That's different than vocabulary. Vocabulary is how many words you understand. Fluency is how many words you can produce in a given amount of time." The variance is staggering: "People vary to a degree you can hardly imagine. Some people... if you get them to do the four-letter test in three minutes... they'll write down 12 words. Some will write down 150. The ones writing down 150... their minds are going at a hypomanic rate. They're just thinking five times as fast. Without any remission whatsoever." On when it goes too far: "When that gets completely out of control, you have someone who's manic. There's nothing fun about manic. That's where the word 'maniac' comes from. Someone who's manic has a thousand different plans... each of which are one sentence long... that they're hyper-enthusiastic about. They'll spend every cent of their money pursuing them. And things just go immediately to hell." He applies it: "That's the outer limit of pathology on the creative front. Someone like Musk who's clearly a genius... that's what he's contending with in his internal landscape. I'm not saying he's manic because I see no signs of that. But someone that creative is on that edge." On minds that move too fast: "Take someone like Ben Shapiro. It's very interesting to talk to Ben... Russell Brand is the same way. Shapiro speaks more rapidly than anyone I ever met. But if you're with him, you see very clearly that he's probably thinking five times that fast. And that's a lot." Peterson shares his own experience: "When I was writing Maps of Meaning... my first book... I had a very difficult time shutting off my mind. I was obsessed with that book. I was writing about 3 hours a day. Then I was thinking about the material for like 12 hours. And the thoughts came way faster than thinking. They probably came about as fast as I can read... about 1,200 words a minute. It was just nonstop thought for 16 hours a day." How he coped: "That's part of the reason I started lifting weights. If I was lifting heavy... thinking at 1,200 words a minute while I've got 100 pounds on my back... it was enough to shut it down. It was also one of the reasons I drank. That was another thing that would shut it off." On the price of genius: "The price that people pay to be the person they admire is such an interesting frame. 'My mind is a storm. I don't think most people would want to be me.' The price you would have to pay in order to be me is not one you would want to pay." The interviewer pushes back: but you're one of the richest men on the planet, you get to release bulletproof cars and put rockets in space... Peterson: "Yeah, but what about all the baggage? He also appears to me to be hyper-conscientious. Musk isn't just a creative genius... he's also an extremely conscientious engineer. Really conscientious engineers have very interesting minds. When they understand something... they understand how to build it out of atoms. They understand it at every single level." On the rare combination: "Musk appears to me to be someone who's this rare combination of hyper-creative but also hyper-conscientious. And I know he works all the time." The interviewer asks: does that hypertrophied executive function help wrangle some of the diffuse creative energy? Peterson: "Yes. Definitely. Eric Weinstein is a good example... Eric is unbelievably creative but he's not particularly conscientious. I think he found an occupation where that works extremely well... he worked with Peter Thiel for quite a long time as his idea man." He contrasts: "Musk is hyper-creative and as far as I can tell hyper-conscientious. The conscientiousness does focus it. Lots of creative people aren't conscientious. There's no correlation between creativity and conscientiousness." The math: "If you're the most creative person in a thousand... and you're the most conscientious person in a thousand... you're one person in a million. Musk is probably more like one person in 100 million. Maybe more. Maybe a billion."

Jaynit

182,052 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Much as I like to have fun on this channel, I do want to address a serious topic. June is Men's Mental Health Month. Men are expected to be strong and bear heavy burdens, but even the strongest person needs reassurance sometimes. Sonic in SatAM is a chill guy who loves to goof around. But the reality is that he's surviving a nightmare. His world has been taken over by a tyrant, his family is gone, and his beloved Uncle Chuck was turned into a robot against his will. As much as Sonic tries to stay strong and maintain a positive outlook, there is only so much one person can bear. Seeing Sonic cry over his uncle humanizes him. It reminds us that there are layers to his character in SatAM that go far beyond his cool attitude and catchphrases. Thankfully, Sonic had friends to help him through it. No one judged him for his sadness, because even strong men need to cry. As much as Sonic saves the world, sometimes he needs to be saved too. Sally may often get annoyed by Sonic's antics, but she loves him enough to provide vital emotional support when he breaks down. We all need people like that in our lives. There is a reason Sonic and Sally’s bond is so strong. They have proven they can depend on each other in their darkest moments. Sonic might be the one fighting SWAT-Bots, but Sally is the one making sure he is mentally able to keep going. Like most men, Sonic doesn't want to admit when he can't carry the weight anymore. Men are often conditioned to just keep moving forward, which makes having a supportive, nurturing circle so vital. A woman's gentle touch means the world to men like that. The point is, if you know a man who is stressed out or going through a lot, reach out to him. As a man myself, I can confirm we're not always willing to admit when something is bothering us. But if you give it time, and if we trust you, we'll open up. And if you're the one struggling, you don't have to broadcast it to the world. If you need to do it in private, that's completely fine. Reach out to someone in real life, in DMs, or a private Discord server. Talk to someone you are close with. It doesn't make you any less of a man to do so. After all, confronting your problems is the true essence of masculinity. Here's to Men's Mental Health Awareness. To all you guys out there: take care of yourselves. ~MR
1:06

Much as I like to have fun on this channel, I do want to address a serious topic. June is Men's Mental Health Month. Men are expected to be strong and bear heavy burdens, but even the strongest person needs reassurance sometimes. Sonic in SatAM is a chill guy who loves to goof around. But the reality is that he's surviving a nightmare. His world has been taken over by a tyrant, his family is gone, and his beloved Uncle Chuck was turned into a robot against his will. As much as Sonic tries to stay strong and maintain a positive outlook, there is only so much one person can bear. Seeing Sonic cry over his uncle humanizes him. It reminds us that there are layers to his character in SatAM that go far beyond his cool attitude and catchphrases. Thankfully, Sonic had friends to help him through it. No one judged him for his sadness, because even strong men need to cry. As much as Sonic saves the world, sometimes he needs to be saved too. Sally may often get annoyed by Sonic's antics, but she loves him enough to provide vital emotional support when he breaks down. We all need people like that in our lives. There is a reason Sonic and Sally’s bond is so strong. They have proven they can depend on each other in their darkest moments. Sonic might be the one fighting SWAT-Bots, but Sally is the one making sure he is mentally able to keep going. Like most men, Sonic doesn't want to admit when he can't carry the weight anymore. Men are often conditioned to just keep moving forward, which makes having a supportive, nurturing circle so vital. A woman's gentle touch means the world to men like that. The point is, if you know a man who is stressed out or going through a lot, reach out to him. As a man myself, I can confirm we're not always willing to admit when something is bothering us. But if you give it time, and if we trust you, we'll open up. And if you're the one struggling, you don't have to broadcast it to the world. If you need to do it in private, that's completely fine. Reach out to someone in real life, in DMs, or a private Discord server. Talk to someone you are close with. It doesn't make you any less of a man to do so. After all, confronting your problems is the true essence of masculinity. Here's to Men's Mental Health Awareness. To all you guys out there: take care of yourselves. ~MR

Sally4All

19,550 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

"If you have the facts and the law on your side, you don't need to pound the table, Mr. Bederow!" Here's my overview as to why Robert Cosgrove stalling for months to get a protective order for Lindsey Gaetani's phone extraction (that Brian Tully leaked, unredacted, after only removing messages from Tully to Lindsey and from PI Kate Peter to Lindsey) is Aidan Kearney's strongest argument for Cosgrove's recusal. I am not a lawyer. This is not legal advice. I am a towel. TRANSCRIPT: Before Ms. Gaetani accused him of intentional misconduct, Mr. Cosgrove successfully fought to prevent the public release of embarrassing and private details from her personal life by seeking broad impoundment and protective orders. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. I don't care if you weren't on the case at that point - you don't get that wrong. I'm sorry, I have to object on fact. Olivia, that is not what happened. Olivia prides herself on a knowledge of the factual record. Olivia, that is not what happened. You wanna know what happened? You want me to lay it out for you? I'll do it. April 2024. Brian Tully, personally --well, Ken Mello is in the hospital-- takes a 15-year unredacted extraction of Lindsey Gaetani's cell phone, compared to Natalie, who was allowed to submit her cell phone to a private company and remove things before Tully got the extraction of Natalie's phone. Ms. Hoity-Toity over there. Fuck your aristocracy, fuck your Hollywood, fuck yourself. Anyway, so Tully, in all his infinite fucking wisdom, removes messages from Kate Peter to Lindsey and from Tully to Lindsey before leaking this extraction while Ken Mello's in the fucking hospital. Then Ken Mello invokes the clawback provision of the discovery rules in Bradl's—like, I'm Tim Bradl. He was being Tim Bradl. As much as I blame Aidan and Tim Bradl for being Aidan and Tim Bradl, they were just proxies here. Folks, Tully was the mastermind and Jason Broyles was the intended recipient so that Broyles could attack Lindsey and myself to get credibility with Turtle Riders, to get close to Aidan so he could feed intel back to Kate and Tully, in my opinion. Anyway, the point is, that's in April. Tully doesn't even return Lindsey's call for like six days and then he's like, eh, meh. Of course he was like, meh, because he's a motherfucker, in my opinion. I mean, not lovingly. So anyway, this motherfucker goes about his business, doesn't give a fuck. Cosgrove doesn't do fucking shit until September of 2024. And he knows it. And everybody knows it. That motherfucker goes into court - oh, I get in a mood about this. That motherfucker goes into court in September of 2024 and fucking writes a handwritten fucking protective order, being like, oh, it's okay if Aiden keeps a copy of the phone and et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. That was in front of Judge Squires Lee. That was the same day that Lindsey got sabotaged at the courthouse by a court clerk...no comment. I love most of those clerks. They're wonderful. I love the court officers. I don't like what happened that day. I don't like it at all. Anyway, so I go in there -- wait a minute, what were we talking about? Oh, right. I think I was watching court that day. I was either watching or there, and Lindsey is there and Tully's -- Cosgrove's there and Bradl's there. And Judge Squires Lee is like, ah, you know, go write the agreement. So Cosgrove and Bradl write it by hand and file it. Fucking bullshit. You know how I -- now I'm not saying Judge Squires Lee did anything wrong. I think the clerk kind of misled her because she was in the bag for Jen McCabe, which is a whole different story. But the point is, so the one thing that Judge Squires Lee did that made me realize that I think she caught on to the fact that the clerks fucked around was that Judge Squires Lee entered an order on the docket permanently allowing Lindsey to file pleadings. So anytime Lindsey could just go in and they'd be like, no - -Lindsey could be like, I have an order from Judge Squires Lee. It was the strangest thing. Anyway, so that kind of-- but I don't really know what to make of all that. Anyway, so it's bullshit though. That is wrong from Bederow. And I'll tell you why: because it wasn't until Lindsey made a motion, okay, about this protective order that Judge Krupp on December 27th, 2024, spanked Brian Tully and Robert Cosgrove and Aiden a little bit. And it was --I'm paraphrasing here, Judge did not say the word motherfucker-- and it was like you motherfuckers. You got to read that three-page order from Judge Krupp from December 27th. You want to say Robert Cosgrove --no, Mr. Bederow-- no. And what's weird is there's no reason to present it this way, okay? Because presenting it the way that is true to the factual record and in the way I just described buttresses your argument that Cosgrove was conflicted because he tried to let the phone extraction go unprotected for months. Hello? Feel like I'm fucking banging my head against the wall sometimes with these fucking lawyers. Sorry, I shouldn't add this coffee, I'm in a mood. The point is, no. That's wrong, factually. And the factual record makes your argument stronger. Oh my god. Oh my god. How can - how can you get it so wrong and hurt your own argument at the same time? If you're gonna get it fucking wrong, get it wrong because the truth hurts your argument. If you have the truth and if you have the facts on your side and the law on your side, you don't have to pound the table. Just state it correctly. Cosgrove sabotaged the attempts to get a protective order on the phone, and five months after the phone was released by Tully --mind you-- Cosgrove is delaying to protect Tully, because Tully edited the extraction because he wanted it to be released right when the first Karen Read trial started, so that all the Turtle Riders would focus on Lindsey. And I'll tell you, there's something to be said here. There's something to be said about how even Bederow doesn't get it. Because Cosgrove doing that—waiting months to do the first bullshit protective order, and then not doing anything to get Judge Krupp to issue a protective order—it was Lindsey who got Judge Krupp to do that. Well, it was Judge Krupp realizing, I think, what had happened. Judge Krupp, when he retires, I want to talk to him about that day. I want to be like, did you—how pissed were you when you realized that Tully did this on purpose? I'm dropping like, oh that went fine. Judge Krupp is a stern judge too. You know what, I'm gonna get on his bad side. If you're on his good side, you might get a smile and a little chuckle. And then he's right into it. If you're on his bad side, he will not let you talk. I love judges like that. All right, let's continue. So it's like, my God, go to federal court. If you get a smile from Judge Talwani, that is like a core memory. I got a smile from Judge Talwani. I just beamed. Now, she did put a court sign on her courtroom being like no loud typing before I got there. So I knew she knew I was coming. It was for the Leslie hearing. But she still smiled at me. But anyway, this is wrong. I just want to tell you that on page 10 of 22, paragraph --second full paragraph, lines one through four-- it's just wrong. And Bederow should make the argument stronger by pointing out that Cosgrove was hostile to Lindsey and therefore had a bias against her long before any of this went down. Cosgrove was protecting Tully and Kate Peter from the beginning. There's a pattern. Cosgrove also hid that email from Kate Peter to Ken Mello. We're going to read it at the end of this. Come on, breathe. Bederow. Is this what all New York Jets fans are like? Aren't you a Patriots fan, motherfucker? I was going to say his life would really suck if he's a Jets fan. But if he's a Pats fan - now I remember he wears Pats sweatshirts. Come on, Mr. Bederow. Think like Tom Brady. His view apparently changed. No, it did not. No, it did not, Mr. Bederow.
8:33

"If you have the facts and the law on your side, you don't need to pound the table, Mr. Bederow!" Here's my overview as to why Robert Cosgrove stalling for months to get a protective order for Lindsey Gaetani's phone extraction (that Brian Tully leaked, unredacted, after only removing messages from Tully to Lindsey and from PI Kate Peter to Lindsey) is Aidan Kearney's strongest argument for Cosgrove's recusal. I am not a lawyer. This is not legal advice. I am a towel. TRANSCRIPT: Before Ms. Gaetani accused him of intentional misconduct, Mr. Cosgrove successfully fought to prevent the public release of embarrassing and private details from her personal life by seeking broad impoundment and protective orders. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. I don't care if you weren't on the case at that point - you don't get that wrong. I'm sorry, I have to object on fact. Olivia, that is not what happened. Olivia prides herself on a knowledge of the factual record. Olivia, that is not what happened. You wanna know what happened? You want me to lay it out for you? I'll do it. April 2024. Brian Tully, personally --well, Ken Mello is in the hospital-- takes a 15-year unredacted extraction of Lindsey Gaetani's cell phone, compared to Natalie, who was allowed to submit her cell phone to a private company and remove things before Tully got the extraction of Natalie's phone. Ms. Hoity-Toity over there. Fuck your aristocracy, fuck your Hollywood, fuck yourself. Anyway, so Tully, in all his infinite fucking wisdom, removes messages from Kate Peter to Lindsey and from Tully to Lindsey before leaking this extraction while Ken Mello's in the fucking hospital. Then Ken Mello invokes the clawback provision of the discovery rules in Bradl's—like, I'm Tim Bradl. He was being Tim Bradl. As much as I blame Aidan and Tim Bradl for being Aidan and Tim Bradl, they were just proxies here. Folks, Tully was the mastermind and Jason Broyles was the intended recipient so that Broyles could attack Lindsey and myself to get credibility with Turtle Riders, to get close to Aidan so he could feed intel back to Kate and Tully, in my opinion. Anyway, the point is, that's in April. Tully doesn't even return Lindsey's call for like six days and then he's like, eh, meh. Of course he was like, meh, because he's a motherfucker, in my opinion. I mean, not lovingly. So anyway, this motherfucker goes about his business, doesn't give a fuck. Cosgrove doesn't do fucking shit until September of 2024. And he knows it. And everybody knows it. That motherfucker goes into court - oh, I get in a mood about this. That motherfucker goes into court in September of 2024 and fucking writes a handwritten fucking protective order, being like, oh, it's okay if Aiden keeps a copy of the phone and et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. That was in front of Judge Squires Lee. That was the same day that Lindsey got sabotaged at the courthouse by a court clerk...no comment. I love most of those clerks. They're wonderful. I love the court officers. I don't like what happened that day. I don't like it at all. Anyway, so I go in there -- wait a minute, what were we talking about? Oh, right. I think I was watching court that day. I was either watching or there, and Lindsey is there and Tully's -- Cosgrove's there and Bradl's there. And Judge Squires Lee is like, ah, you know, go write the agreement. So Cosgrove and Bradl write it by hand and file it. Fucking bullshit. You know how I -- now I'm not saying Judge Squires Lee did anything wrong. I think the clerk kind of misled her because she was in the bag for Jen McCabe, which is a whole different story. But the point is, so the one thing that Judge Squires Lee did that made me realize that I think she caught on to the fact that the clerks fucked around was that Judge Squires Lee entered an order on the docket permanently allowing Lindsey to file pleadings. So anytime Lindsey could just go in and they'd be like, no - -Lindsey could be like, I have an order from Judge Squires Lee. It was the strangest thing. Anyway, so that kind of-- but I don't really know what to make of all that. Anyway, so it's bullshit though. That is wrong from Bederow. And I'll tell you why: because it wasn't until Lindsey made a motion, okay, about this protective order that Judge Krupp on December 27th, 2024, spanked Brian Tully and Robert Cosgrove and Aiden a little bit. And it was --I'm paraphrasing here, Judge did not say the word motherfucker-- and it was like you motherfuckers. You got to read that three-page order from Judge Krupp from December 27th. You want to say Robert Cosgrove --no, Mr. Bederow-- no. And what's weird is there's no reason to present it this way, okay? Because presenting it the way that is true to the factual record and in the way I just described buttresses your argument that Cosgrove was conflicted because he tried to let the phone extraction go unprotected for months. Hello? Feel like I'm fucking banging my head against the wall sometimes with these fucking lawyers. Sorry, I shouldn't add this coffee, I'm in a mood. The point is, no. That's wrong, factually. And the factual record makes your argument stronger. Oh my god. Oh my god. How can - how can you get it so wrong and hurt your own argument at the same time? If you're gonna get it fucking wrong, get it wrong because the truth hurts your argument. If you have the truth and if you have the facts on your side and the law on your side, you don't have to pound the table. Just state it correctly. Cosgrove sabotaged the attempts to get a protective order on the phone, and five months after the phone was released by Tully --mind you-- Cosgrove is delaying to protect Tully, because Tully edited the extraction because he wanted it to be released right when the first Karen Read trial started, so that all the Turtle Riders would focus on Lindsey. And I'll tell you, there's something to be said here. There's something to be said about how even Bederow doesn't get it. Because Cosgrove doing that—waiting months to do the first bullshit protective order, and then not doing anything to get Judge Krupp to issue a protective order—it was Lindsey who got Judge Krupp to do that. Well, it was Judge Krupp realizing, I think, what had happened. Judge Krupp, when he retires, I want to talk to him about that day. I want to be like, did you—how pissed were you when you realized that Tully did this on purpose? I'm dropping like, oh that went fine. Judge Krupp is a stern judge too. You know what, I'm gonna get on his bad side. If you're on his good side, you might get a smile and a little chuckle. And then he's right into it. If you're on his bad side, he will not let you talk. I love judges like that. All right, let's continue. So it's like, my God, go to federal court. If you get a smile from Judge Talwani, that is like a core memory. I got a smile from Judge Talwani. I just beamed. Now, she did put a court sign on her courtroom being like no loud typing before I got there. So I knew she knew I was coming. It was for the Leslie hearing. But she still smiled at me. But anyway, this is wrong. I just want to tell you that on page 10 of 22, paragraph --second full paragraph, lines one through four-- it's just wrong. And Bederow should make the argument stronger by pointing out that Cosgrove was hostile to Lindsey and therefore had a bias against her long before any of this went down. Cosgrove was protecting Tully and Kate Peter from the beginning. There's a pattern. Cosgrove also hid that email from Kate Peter to Ken Mello. We're going to read it at the end of this. Come on, breathe. Bederow. Is this what all New York Jets fans are like? Aren't you a Patriots fan, motherfucker? I was going to say his life would really suck if he's a Jets fan. But if he's a Pats fan - now I remember he wears Pats sweatshirts. Come on, Mr. Bederow. Think like Tom Brady. His view apparently changed. No, it did not. No, it did not, Mr. Bederow.

Grant Smith Ellis

13,885 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Four words gave him away. NOT UP FOR NEGOTIATION. That's not a leader talking. That's a man reading out a pitch somebody else wrote for him. The man with all the answers, here at last to save a Britain he's spent twenty five years climbing over. Burnham didn't win an election. Burnham was INSTALLED. Four weeks. That's the gap between him becoming an MP and them fitting him for Prime Minister. No seat in June. Running the country by July, and not one of you was ever asked. He isn't the change. He's the COVER STORY. He says devolution. Power to the people. It's a SMOKESCREEN. Watch the salesman at the front and you miss the hands working behind him. He didn't dodge the press because he's shy. He dodged them because he CAN'T ANSWER THEM. The Times watched his last interview and called him utterly unconvincing. Then he announced he's rebuilding the whole country and took not one question. Strange sort of saviour, won't take a single question about the miracle. Watch the pitch. His direction is NOT UP FOR NEGOTIATION. Fixed. Final. No say for you. Then he promises an INCLUSIVE team. Then refuses to name a single soul on it. Then tells you to ignore anyone who goes looking. Inclusive. While he decides everything and names nobody. The most secretive move in politics, wrapped in the friendliest word in the dictionary, and the room clapped like he'd cured something. The team was picked months ago. He's just not allowed to read out the names yet. The salesman, caught pricing up the goods himself AND IT WAS NEVER SUDDEN Last August, already the most popular man in his party. September, a network quietly forms around him. They call it Mainstream. January, he tries to get into Parliament and the Prime Minister himself votes to BLOCK him. Blocked and it changed nothing. Five months later he walks through a different door like the lock was never there. The one man who could have stood against him folded inside the hour. No contest. A coronation, dressed up as a choice. The Prime Minister tried to stop this and couldn't. So ask yourself who actually can. WATCH THE TRICKS IN THE PITCH He says a more streamlined state. Then announces a brand new Downing Street. New building. New staff. New bills. Streamlined, while making it bigger. You actually could not write it. The room clapped for forty five seconds and not one of them did the sum. He says power will flow to every corner of Britain. But the hand on the tap stays in Manchester, in his fist. He keeps saying devolution, but the mayors he hands it to don't control the money. The Treasury does. The experts even have a name for it. A performed illusion of reform. Devolution isn't the gift. It's the wrapping paper. Then he reached for Germany to sound clever. But Germany's regions have their own constitutions, power no centre can rip back. Britain has one Parliament, and it can take back every crumb overnight. Wallpaper over a promise with nothing behind it. Then he walked off and took not one question. THE BIT THAT HITS YOUR FRONT DOOR Forget the sales patter a second. Here's what he's actually selling you. He wants your water. Your energy. Your home. Sold to you as public ownership. So who sets your bill then. Not you. Not anyone you ever voted for. A handful of people you've never heard of, who answer to nobody. Then he wants a tax on what your house is WORTH. Not what you earn. What it's worth just sitting there and because it's tied to house prices, the dearer your area, the harder you're hit. London alone, SEVEN BILLION pounds. Some homes, a THOUSAND pounds a year more. Just for owning the bricks around you. For a roof you already paid for. That lands on top of the heaviest tax burden this country has carried since 1948. Before this man has passed a single law. New office. New tax. New ten year plan. Spend, spend, spend. Tax, tax, tax. And nobody, anywhere, has told you what the bill comes to. Some rescue. Now glance at the roof over your head. 172,000 children sitting in B&Bs tonight, and the homes that are left bought up for the Home Office while you stay on the list. Your own government, bidding against you for the same bricks. Funny, that. MEET THE SALESMAN He's run for leader twice. Lost both times. The public have never once chosen him for anything bigger than Manchester. Watch how the great saviour actually moves. Blairite under Blair. Stayed under Corbyn when every other Blairite walked. Backed Starmer when Starmer rose. Now Reform surges and suddenly he agrees with Farage. Blair, Corbyn, Starmer, Farage. Four men, four directions, and he turned to face every one the moment it started winning. That's not conviction. That's a WEATHER VANE, spinning whichever way the wind pays best. He sold this country compulsory ID cards twenty years ago. Hold that thought next time he plays the man who'll set you free. A month into running our hospitals, patients were dying in their own urine. He opened an inquiry, then bolted the doors on it, and knocked back eighty one pleas to hold it in public. It took losing power for the truth to get out. A grooming gang ran riot on his patch as Mayor. Three jailed out of ninety seven. His response was called supine, and supine is the kind word for it. Twenty five years. Same pitch every time. THE HANDS BEHIND HIM One man gave up his seat for Burnham, and was already writing his lines while he did it. Both jobs at once. His chief of staff spent years on the payroll of Apple, Amazon and BP. Now he's the voice in Burnham's ear. The woman shaping his economy ran a think tank, walked into Downing Street, walked back out, and is on her way back in. Nobody ever voted for her once. Mainstream signed off the whole pitch months before he had a seat. He didn't write a word of it. Somebody handed it to him finished and pushed him out in front of the cameras. He's the face on the front of it. Reading lines other men wrote. Taking the credit that belongs to the people behind him who'll never once step into view. THIS IS THE PART THAT NEVER MOVES Here's the bit the great man will never tell you. The salesman at the front is the only part of this you get to vote for and the only part that ever changes. Behind him sits everything that actually runs the country. Officials who never face an election and never leave. Lobbyists who cycle through every government no matter the colour of the rosette. Think tanks that write the policy before a minister reads it. Burnham's own right hand was paid by Apple, Amazon and BP. Not one of them British. Not one on any ballot you've ever seen. The money behind this doesn't stop at Dover. The Cabinet Secretary who built the borders scheme is one face of it. There are hundreds more you'll never be shown. They were here before Burnham. They'll be here after him. Before Starmer, before the Tories, and long after Reform has had its turn. They don't change the country. They just change the suit. Starmer in his glasses. Burnham with his accent. Different face. Same con. Same hands behind it. You change the salesman. You never touch the people he's selling for. He isn't the change you're praying for. He's a twice rejected man with a weather vane where his spine should be, wheeled out in front of something that was running long before him and will run long after. It doesn't care who's clapping. It just needs a face at the front, and a room that wants to believe.
3:58

Four words gave him away. NOT UP FOR NEGOTIATION. That's not a leader talking. That's a man reading out a pitch somebody else wrote for him. The man with all the answers, here at last to save a Britain he's spent twenty five years climbing over. Burnham didn't win an election. Burnham was INSTALLED. Four weeks. That's the gap between him becoming an MP and them fitting him for Prime Minister. No seat in June. Running the country by July, and not one of you was ever asked. He isn't the change. He's the COVER STORY. He says devolution. Power to the people. It's a SMOKESCREEN. Watch the salesman at the front and you miss the hands working behind him. He didn't dodge the press because he's shy. He dodged them because he CAN'T ANSWER THEM. The Times watched his last interview and called him utterly unconvincing. Then he announced he's rebuilding the whole country and took not one question. Strange sort of saviour, won't take a single question about the miracle. Watch the pitch. His direction is NOT UP FOR NEGOTIATION. Fixed. Final. No say for you. Then he promises an INCLUSIVE team. Then refuses to name a single soul on it. Then tells you to ignore anyone who goes looking. Inclusive. While he decides everything and names nobody. The most secretive move in politics, wrapped in the friendliest word in the dictionary, and the room clapped like he'd cured something. The team was picked months ago. He's just not allowed to read out the names yet. The salesman, caught pricing up the goods himself AND IT WAS NEVER SUDDEN Last August, already the most popular man in his party. September, a network quietly forms around him. They call it Mainstream. January, he tries to get into Parliament and the Prime Minister himself votes to BLOCK him. Blocked and it changed nothing. Five months later he walks through a different door like the lock was never there. The one man who could have stood against him folded inside the hour. No contest. A coronation, dressed up as a choice. The Prime Minister tried to stop this and couldn't. So ask yourself who actually can. WATCH THE TRICKS IN THE PITCH He says a more streamlined state. Then announces a brand new Downing Street. New building. New staff. New bills. Streamlined, while making it bigger. You actually could not write it. The room clapped for forty five seconds and not one of them did the sum. He says power will flow to every corner of Britain. But the hand on the tap stays in Manchester, in his fist. He keeps saying devolution, but the mayors he hands it to don't control the money. The Treasury does. The experts even have a name for it. A performed illusion of reform. Devolution isn't the gift. It's the wrapping paper. Then he reached for Germany to sound clever. But Germany's regions have their own constitutions, power no centre can rip back. Britain has one Parliament, and it can take back every crumb overnight. Wallpaper over a promise with nothing behind it. Then he walked off and took not one question. THE BIT THAT HITS YOUR FRONT DOOR Forget the sales patter a second. Here's what he's actually selling you. He wants your water. Your energy. Your home. Sold to you as public ownership. So who sets your bill then. Not you. Not anyone you ever voted for. A handful of people you've never heard of, who answer to nobody. Then he wants a tax on what your house is WORTH. Not what you earn. What it's worth just sitting there and because it's tied to house prices, the dearer your area, the harder you're hit. London alone, SEVEN BILLION pounds. Some homes, a THOUSAND pounds a year more. Just for owning the bricks around you. For a roof you already paid for. That lands on top of the heaviest tax burden this country has carried since 1948. Before this man has passed a single law. New office. New tax. New ten year plan. Spend, spend, spend. Tax, tax, tax. And nobody, anywhere, has told you what the bill comes to. Some rescue. Now glance at the roof over your head. 172,000 children sitting in B&Bs tonight, and the homes that are left bought up for the Home Office while you stay on the list. Your own government, bidding against you for the same bricks. Funny, that. MEET THE SALESMAN He's run for leader twice. Lost both times. The public have never once chosen him for anything bigger than Manchester. Watch how the great saviour actually moves. Blairite under Blair. Stayed under Corbyn when every other Blairite walked. Backed Starmer when Starmer rose. Now Reform surges and suddenly he agrees with Farage. Blair, Corbyn, Starmer, Farage. Four men, four directions, and he turned to face every one the moment it started winning. That's not conviction. That's a WEATHER VANE, spinning whichever way the wind pays best. He sold this country compulsory ID cards twenty years ago. Hold that thought next time he plays the man who'll set you free. A month into running our hospitals, patients were dying in their own urine. He opened an inquiry, then bolted the doors on it, and knocked back eighty one pleas to hold it in public. It took losing power for the truth to get out. A grooming gang ran riot on his patch as Mayor. Three jailed out of ninety seven. His response was called supine, and supine is the kind word for it. Twenty five years. Same pitch every time. THE HANDS BEHIND HIM One man gave up his seat for Burnham, and was already writing his lines while he did it. Both jobs at once. His chief of staff spent years on the payroll of Apple, Amazon and BP. Now he's the voice in Burnham's ear. The woman shaping his economy ran a think tank, walked into Downing Street, walked back out, and is on her way back in. Nobody ever voted for her once. Mainstream signed off the whole pitch months before he had a seat. He didn't write a word of it. Somebody handed it to him finished and pushed him out in front of the cameras. He's the face on the front of it. Reading lines other men wrote. Taking the credit that belongs to the people behind him who'll never once step into view. THIS IS THE PART THAT NEVER MOVES Here's the bit the great man will never tell you. The salesman at the front is the only part of this you get to vote for and the only part that ever changes. Behind him sits everything that actually runs the country. Officials who never face an election and never leave. Lobbyists who cycle through every government no matter the colour of the rosette. Think tanks that write the policy before a minister reads it. Burnham's own right hand was paid by Apple, Amazon and BP. Not one of them British. Not one on any ballot you've ever seen. The money behind this doesn't stop at Dover. The Cabinet Secretary who built the borders scheme is one face of it. There are hundreds more you'll never be shown. They were here before Burnham. They'll be here after him. Before Starmer, before the Tories, and long after Reform has had its turn. They don't change the country. They just change the suit. Starmer in his glasses. Burnham with his accent. Different face. Same con. Same hands behind it. You change the salesman. You never touch the people he's selling for. He isn't the change you're praying for. He's a twice rejected man with a weather vane where his spine should be, wheeled out in front of something that was running long before him and will run long after. It doesn't care who's clapping. It just needs a face at the front, and a room that wants to believe.

BanksyCat

131,895 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Made $313 → $2,382,780 in 4 Days Using a Claude AI Bot on Polymarket. 26,738 trades. 98% win rate. Full blockchain proof. Every single trade verifiable on-chain. I've made the exact step-by-step guide to build this Claude Polymarket bot from scratch. You've been trading for 3 years. Still red. He gave Claude $313. Woke up rich. Free for 24 hours. To get this Setup guide: 1. Comment "Money" 2. Like and Retweet 3. Follow me Himanshu Kumar (so i can DM you) Full 2-hour video tutorial attached. Every single click and command explained. Beginner to running bot. Now let me break down exactly how this works. Save this post. This is the most important trading breakdown you'll ever read. ↓ Let's start with the number that should make you sick. $313. That's what this wallet started with. Not $50,000. Not $10,000. Not even $1,000. $313. Less than your monthly Netflix + Uber Eats + Spotify combined. 4 months later: $2,382,780.80. That's a 7,942x return. While you spent those same 4 months staring at charts, drawing trendlines, panic selling, revenge trading, and ending the month exactly where you started. Minus the $200 you lost on that "sure thing." Same 4 months. Same market. Same opportunities. He had a bot. You had feelings. Guess who won. Save this post right now. What I'm about to explain is the exact mechanism behind every dollar of that $2.38M. Follow Himanshu Kumar so you don't miss the rest. ↓ How Polymarket actually works and why bots print money on it. Polymarket is a prediction market. Will BTC be higher in 15 minutes? Yes or No. Will the Fed raise rates? Yes or No. You buy shares between $0 and $1. If you're right, your share settles at $1. If you're wrong, it settles at $0. Simple. Now here's where it gets interesting. Polymarket updates its prices SLOWER than the real market moves. When BTC drops 0.6% on Binance, Polymarket still shows old odds for about 2.7 seconds. 2.7 seconds. In those 2.7 seconds, the bot already knows the outcome. It's not predicting. It's not guessing. It's reading information that already exists and trading before Polymarket catches up. That's not trading. That's collecting free money with a 2.7 second head start. And you're over there using a 15-indicator TradingView setup trying to "predict" where BTC goes next. The bot doesn't predict anything. It just reads faster than you. That's the entire edge. Save this post because if you understand this one concept you understand how millionaires are being made on Polymarket right now. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more breakdowns like this. ↓ Let me walk you through one single trade. A new 15-minute BTC contract opens on Polymarket. Odds are 50/50. Fair price. 10 minutes in, BTC drops 0.6% on Binance. Hard, fast move. The real probability of BTC being lower at expiry is now about 78%. Polymarket still shows 54/46. The bot sees this instantly. Binance WebSocket feed. Under 50ms latency. The edge is 24 percentage points. On a binary contract, that's basically free money. Bot calculates position size using Kelly Criterion. Executes via Polymarket's API. Done. Within 2-3 seconds, other participants update the odds. 54/46 moves toward 78/22. Bot either exits for immediate profit or holds to resolution. Either way, the trade was entered with near-certainty of a positive outcome. Now repeat this 200-500 times per day. $313 → $2,382,780 in 4 months. Not magic. Not prediction. Not luck. Industrial-scale exploitation of a market inefficiency that still exists today. And you're still placing one manual trade per day and calling yourself a "trader." This is the mechanism behind every single dollar. Bookmark this post so you can study it again. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'm breaking down each strategy separately. ↓ There are 4 strategies. Not all Claude bots do the same thing. Strategy 1: Latency Arbitrage. Win rate: 85-98%. What 0x8dxd used. Monitor Binance price feeds. When Polymarket odds lag behind reality by 3-5%, buy the correct side before the market corrects. No forecasting. No model. No sentiment analysis. Pure speed. You're not guessing. You're reading an outcome that has already happened. Strategy 2: Oracle Arbitrage. Win rate: 78-85%. Chainlink oracle price feeds occasionally diverge from Polymarket's implied prices. When they do, the settlement direction is known. Fewer opportunities. Higher certainty when they appear. Strategy 3: News-Driven Trading. Win rate: 60-75%. Claude ingests real-time news. Government filings. Central bank statements. On-chain data. Assesses probability impact before retail traders even finish reading the headline. Lower win rate because interpretation introduces uncertainty. But works on ANY market category, not just crypto. Strategy 4: Market Making. Return: 2-5% per month. Place buy and sell orders on both sides. Capture the spread. No prediction required. Most consistent. Hardest to blow up. Compounds aggressively over time. You didn't even know there were 4 strategies. You thought "trading bot" meant one thing. That's how far behind you are. 4 strategies. 4 different risk profiles. 4 ways to make money while you sleep. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the deep dive into each one. ↓ The timeline that should haunt you. December 2025: Bot launches with $313. Nobody notices. January 6, 2026: Wallet hits ~$438,000. 140x in 30 days. 6,615 predictions. 98% win rate. Finbold reports it. Crypto Twitter explodes. March 10, 2026: Head-to-head test. Claude bot: $1,000 → $14,216 in 48 hours. +1,322%. OpenClaw bot: fully liquidated. Same market. Same timeframe. Claude won because of better risk management. OpenClaw died because it overleveraged. March 16, 2026: Someone trains a swarm model on 3 years of NBA data. Result: +$1.49M on Polymarket. April 2026: 0x8dxd final verified balance: $2,382,780.80. 26,738 trades. 4 months. This all happened while you were "waiting for the right time to start." The right time was December 2025. The second best time is right now. But you'll probably wait until it's too late. That's what you always do. Every date on this timeline is a day you could have started but didn't. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar so you at least start today. ↓ Why Claude and not ChatGPT? This isn't opinion. It's data. March 2026 head-to-head: Claude bot: +1,322%. OpenClaw (GPT-based): liquidated. Same prompt. Same market. Same conditions. Researchers found Claude's code included: > More defensive edge cases > More conservative default parameters > Better error handling > More legible code for debugging > Proper Kelly Criterion position sizing > Hard drawdown kill switches ChatGPT's code overleveraged into a losing sequence and couldn't recover. Claude's code sized positions conservatively, stopped trading when drawdown thresholds hit, and survived to compound another day. The difference between +1,322% and liquidation wasn't the strategy. It was the risk management. And Claude writes better risk management than ChatGPT. That's not a debate. That's a $15,216 difference in 48 hours. But sure, keep using ChatGPT because "everyone uses it." Everyone's broke too. Coincidence? Stop using the popular tool. Start using the profitable one. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more Claude vs ChatGPT comparisons with real data. ↓ Why humans lose to bots. Every single time. Same strategy. Same market. Same period. Bots: ~$206,000 profit. Humans: ~$100,000 profit. 2x gap. Same strategy. Here's why: 1. Late entries. By the time you identify the lag, verify your reasoning, and click buy, the 2.7 second window is gone. The bot executes in under 100ms. You execute in 30 seconds. The opportunity doesn't exist for 30 seconds. 2. Emotional sizing. You oversize when "confident." Undersize when scared. Exact opposite of Kelly math. The bot sizes based on edge. Every time. No feelings. 3. Fatigue. You make worse decisions at hour 6 than at hour 1. The bot makes the same decision at hour 72 that it made at hour 1. 4. Drawdown psychology. After 3 losses you either panic quit or double down trying to recover. Both destroy capital. The bot has a kill switch. It stops. It doesn't feel anything. You're not competing with other humans anymore. You're competing with machines that don't sleep, don't feel, don't flinch. And you're losing. The data doesn't lie. Humans lose to bots 2x on the same strategy. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the complete bot setup that removes you from the equation. ↓ What can go wrong. Because I'm not going to lie to you. Most people who build this bot will NOT 7,942x their money. Some will lose their initial capital. Here's what can kill you: Edge compression. The arbitrage window was 12 seconds in 2024. It's 2.7 seconds now. It's shrinking. At some point it hits zero for retail operators. This is a time-limited opportunity. Not a permanent income stream. Rule changes. Polymarket can change contract mechanics, settlement rules, or API terms overnight. What worked yesterday can lose money tomorrow. Risk management bugs. A 98% win rate strategy with broken position sizing will blow up your account on the one losing trade. The March 2026 experiment proved this. Claude survived. OpenClaw got liquidated. Same strategy. Different risk management. That's why the 2-hour video tutorial walks through every single risk parameter. Because the strategy doesn't kill you. Bad risk management kills you. This is the section most "gurus" delete. I'm keeping it because I'd rather you make money safely than blow up and blame me. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for honest breakdowns, not hype. ↓ The step-by-step to build your own. Step 1: Set up a Polymarket wallet. Fund with USDC via Polygon network. Start with $100-$300 for testing. Step 2: Generate API credentials. CLOB API key from docs.polymarket .com. Store private key in environment variable. Never hardcode it. Never share it. Step 3: Prompt Claude to build the bot. Use Claude Code for best results. It reads your filesystem, executes code, and iterates on errors autonomously. Step 4: Paper trade for at least one week. Minimum 200 completed trades. Win rate must be above 70% before going live. This step is NOT optional. Step 5: Configure risk management. Max single position: 8% of portfolio. Daily loss limit: -20% with auto halt. Kill switch at -40% drawdown. Telegram alerts on every threshold. Step 6: Go live small. $1-5 per trade. Watch every trade for first week. Compare to paper results. Scale only on evidence. Skip steps 4 and 5 and you will lose your money. That's not a warning. That's a guarantee. This is your complete build guide. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'll be posting the exact Claude prompts for each strategy. ↓ The edge exists right now. Not next month. Not "when you're ready." Right now. The arbitrage window is 2.7 seconds. It was 12 seconds in 2024. It's shrinking every week. Every day you wait, more bots enter the space. The window gets smaller. Your potential returns get smaller. The bots already running have a compounding advantage. They're making money today that they'll use to make more money tomorrow. You're reading about it and telling yourself "I'll look into this next weekend." That's what you said last weekend. And the weekend before that. The best time to start was 6 months ago. The second best time is today. But you already know you're going to bookmark this and never open it again. Prove me wrong. ↓ Full 2-hour video tutorial attached. Every single click. Every command. Every parameter. From zero to running bot. Beginner friendly. Nothing skipped. A similar bot has already earned $2,382,780. Full blockchain proof in the article below. The video is free. The tools are free. The edge still exists. The only thing that costs money is another month of doing nothing while bots eat every opportunity you're too slow to catch. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the complete series covering every automated income stream using Claude. Prediction markets are just the beginning. Save this post. Bookmark it. Screenshot it. Whatever you need to do so you actually watch the video and build the bot instead of just reading about people who did. You Must Follow me Himanshu Kumar, so i can send you DM.
2:22:35

Made $313 → $2,382,780 in 4 Days Using a Claude AI Bot on Polymarket. 26,738 trades. 98% win rate. Full blockchain proof. Every single trade verifiable on-chain. I've made the exact step-by-step guide to build this Claude Polymarket bot from scratch. You've been trading for 3 years. Still red. He gave Claude $313. Woke up rich. Free for 24 hours. To get this Setup guide: 1. Comment "Money" 2. Like and Retweet 3. Follow me Himanshu Kumar (so i can DM you) Full 2-hour video tutorial attached. Every single click and command explained. Beginner to running bot. Now let me break down exactly how this works. Save this post. This is the most important trading breakdown you'll ever read. ↓ Let's start with the number that should make you sick. $313. That's what this wallet started with. Not $50,000. Not $10,000. Not even $1,000. $313. Less than your monthly Netflix + Uber Eats + Spotify combined. 4 months later: $2,382,780.80. That's a 7,942x return. While you spent those same 4 months staring at charts, drawing trendlines, panic selling, revenge trading, and ending the month exactly where you started. Minus the $200 you lost on that "sure thing." Same 4 months. Same market. Same opportunities. He had a bot. You had feelings. Guess who won. Save this post right now. What I'm about to explain is the exact mechanism behind every dollar of that $2.38M. Follow Himanshu Kumar so you don't miss the rest. ↓ How Polymarket actually works and why bots print money on it. Polymarket is a prediction market. Will BTC be higher in 15 minutes? Yes or No. Will the Fed raise rates? Yes or No. You buy shares between $0 and $1. If you're right, your share settles at $1. If you're wrong, it settles at $0. Simple. Now here's where it gets interesting. Polymarket updates its prices SLOWER than the real market moves. When BTC drops 0.6% on Binance, Polymarket still shows old odds for about 2.7 seconds. 2.7 seconds. In those 2.7 seconds, the bot already knows the outcome. It's not predicting. It's not guessing. It's reading information that already exists and trading before Polymarket catches up. That's not trading. That's collecting free money with a 2.7 second head start. And you're over there using a 15-indicator TradingView setup trying to "predict" where BTC goes next. The bot doesn't predict anything. It just reads faster than you. That's the entire edge. Save this post because if you understand this one concept you understand how millionaires are being made on Polymarket right now. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more breakdowns like this. ↓ Let me walk you through one single trade. A new 15-minute BTC contract opens on Polymarket. Odds are 50/50. Fair price. 10 minutes in, BTC drops 0.6% on Binance. Hard, fast move. The real probability of BTC being lower at expiry is now about 78%. Polymarket still shows 54/46. The bot sees this instantly. Binance WebSocket feed. Under 50ms latency. The edge is 24 percentage points. On a binary contract, that's basically free money. Bot calculates position size using Kelly Criterion. Executes via Polymarket's API. Done. Within 2-3 seconds, other participants update the odds. 54/46 moves toward 78/22. Bot either exits for immediate profit or holds to resolution. Either way, the trade was entered with near-certainty of a positive outcome. Now repeat this 200-500 times per day. $313 → $2,382,780 in 4 months. Not magic. Not prediction. Not luck. Industrial-scale exploitation of a market inefficiency that still exists today. And you're still placing one manual trade per day and calling yourself a "trader." This is the mechanism behind every single dollar. Bookmark this post so you can study it again. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'm breaking down each strategy separately. ↓ There are 4 strategies. Not all Claude bots do the same thing. Strategy 1: Latency Arbitrage. Win rate: 85-98%. What 0x8dxd used. Monitor Binance price feeds. When Polymarket odds lag behind reality by 3-5%, buy the correct side before the market corrects. No forecasting. No model. No sentiment analysis. Pure speed. You're not guessing. You're reading an outcome that has already happened. Strategy 2: Oracle Arbitrage. Win rate: 78-85%. Chainlink oracle price feeds occasionally diverge from Polymarket's implied prices. When they do, the settlement direction is known. Fewer opportunities. Higher certainty when they appear. Strategy 3: News-Driven Trading. Win rate: 60-75%. Claude ingests real-time news. Government filings. Central bank statements. On-chain data. Assesses probability impact before retail traders even finish reading the headline. Lower win rate because interpretation introduces uncertainty. But works on ANY market category, not just crypto. Strategy 4: Market Making. Return: 2-5% per month. Place buy and sell orders on both sides. Capture the spread. No prediction required. Most consistent. Hardest to blow up. Compounds aggressively over time. You didn't even know there were 4 strategies. You thought "trading bot" meant one thing. That's how far behind you are. 4 strategies. 4 different risk profiles. 4 ways to make money while you sleep. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the deep dive into each one. ↓ The timeline that should haunt you. December 2025: Bot launches with $313. Nobody notices. January 6, 2026: Wallet hits ~$438,000. 140x in 30 days. 6,615 predictions. 98% win rate. Finbold reports it. Crypto Twitter explodes. March 10, 2026: Head-to-head test. Claude bot: $1,000 → $14,216 in 48 hours. +1,322%. OpenClaw bot: fully liquidated. Same market. Same timeframe. Claude won because of better risk management. OpenClaw died because it overleveraged. March 16, 2026: Someone trains a swarm model on 3 years of NBA data. Result: +$1.49M on Polymarket. April 2026: 0x8dxd final verified balance: $2,382,780.80. 26,738 trades. 4 months. This all happened while you were "waiting for the right time to start." The right time was December 2025. The second best time is right now. But you'll probably wait until it's too late. That's what you always do. Every date on this timeline is a day you could have started but didn't. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar so you at least start today. ↓ Why Claude and not ChatGPT? This isn't opinion. It's data. March 2026 head-to-head: Claude bot: +1,322%. OpenClaw (GPT-based): liquidated. Same prompt. Same market. Same conditions. Researchers found Claude's code included: > More defensive edge cases > More conservative default parameters > Better error handling > More legible code for debugging > Proper Kelly Criterion position sizing > Hard drawdown kill switches ChatGPT's code overleveraged into a losing sequence and couldn't recover. Claude's code sized positions conservatively, stopped trading when drawdown thresholds hit, and survived to compound another day. The difference between +1,322% and liquidation wasn't the strategy. It was the risk management. And Claude writes better risk management than ChatGPT. That's not a debate. That's a $15,216 difference in 48 hours. But sure, keep using ChatGPT because "everyone uses it." Everyone's broke too. Coincidence? Stop using the popular tool. Start using the profitable one. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more Claude vs ChatGPT comparisons with real data. ↓ Why humans lose to bots. Every single time. Same strategy. Same market. Same period. Bots: ~$206,000 profit. Humans: ~$100,000 profit. 2x gap. Same strategy. Here's why: 1. Late entries. By the time you identify the lag, verify your reasoning, and click buy, the 2.7 second window is gone. The bot executes in under 100ms. You execute in 30 seconds. The opportunity doesn't exist for 30 seconds. 2. Emotional sizing. You oversize when "confident." Undersize when scared. Exact opposite of Kelly math. The bot sizes based on edge. Every time. No feelings. 3. Fatigue. You make worse decisions at hour 6 than at hour 1. The bot makes the same decision at hour 72 that it made at hour 1. 4. Drawdown psychology. After 3 losses you either panic quit or double down trying to recover. Both destroy capital. The bot has a kill switch. It stops. It doesn't feel anything. You're not competing with other humans anymore. You're competing with machines that don't sleep, don't feel, don't flinch. And you're losing. The data doesn't lie. Humans lose to bots 2x on the same strategy. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the complete bot setup that removes you from the equation. ↓ What can go wrong. Because I'm not going to lie to you. Most people who build this bot will NOT 7,942x their money. Some will lose their initial capital. Here's what can kill you: Edge compression. The arbitrage window was 12 seconds in 2024. It's 2.7 seconds now. It's shrinking. At some point it hits zero for retail operators. This is a time-limited opportunity. Not a permanent income stream. Rule changes. Polymarket can change contract mechanics, settlement rules, or API terms overnight. What worked yesterday can lose money tomorrow. Risk management bugs. A 98% win rate strategy with broken position sizing will blow up your account on the one losing trade. The March 2026 experiment proved this. Claude survived. OpenClaw got liquidated. Same strategy. Different risk management. That's why the 2-hour video tutorial walks through every single risk parameter. Because the strategy doesn't kill you. Bad risk management kills you. This is the section most "gurus" delete. I'm keeping it because I'd rather you make money safely than blow up and blame me. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for honest breakdowns, not hype. ↓ The step-by-step to build your own. Step 1: Set up a Polymarket wallet. Fund with USDC via Polygon network. Start with $100-$300 for testing. Step 2: Generate API credentials. CLOB API key from docs.polymarket .com. Store private key in environment variable. Never hardcode it. Never share it. Step 3: Prompt Claude to build the bot. Use Claude Code for best results. It reads your filesystem, executes code, and iterates on errors autonomously. Step 4: Paper trade for at least one week. Minimum 200 completed trades. Win rate must be above 70% before going live. This step is NOT optional. Step 5: Configure risk management. Max single position: 8% of portfolio. Daily loss limit: -20% with auto halt. Kill switch at -40% drawdown. Telegram alerts on every threshold. Step 6: Go live small. $1-5 per trade. Watch every trade for first week. Compare to paper results. Scale only on evidence. Skip steps 4 and 5 and you will lose your money. That's not a warning. That's a guarantee. This is your complete build guide. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'll be posting the exact Claude prompts for each strategy. ↓ The edge exists right now. Not next month. Not "when you're ready." Right now. The arbitrage window is 2.7 seconds. It was 12 seconds in 2024. It's shrinking every week. Every day you wait, more bots enter the space. The window gets smaller. Your potential returns get smaller. The bots already running have a compounding advantage. They're making money today that they'll use to make more money tomorrow. You're reading about it and telling yourself "I'll look into this next weekend." That's what you said last weekend. And the weekend before that. The best time to start was 6 months ago. The second best time is today. But you already know you're going to bookmark this and never open it again. Prove me wrong. ↓ Full 2-hour video tutorial attached. Every single click. Every command. Every parameter. From zero to running bot. Beginner friendly. Nothing skipped. A similar bot has already earned $2,382,780. Full blockchain proof in the article below. The video is free. The tools are free. The edge still exists. The only thing that costs money is another month of doing nothing while bots eat every opportunity you're too slow to catch. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the complete series covering every automated income stream using Claude. Prediction markets are just the beginning. Save this post. Bookmark it. Screenshot it. Whatever you need to do so you actually watch the video and build the bot instead of just reading about people who did. You Must Follow me Himanshu Kumar, so i can send you DM.

Himanshu Kumar

53,202 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад