Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Act One: Delivering on the Promise. Delivering on President Tinubu's commitment to Nigerian workers: - Pension assets increased by 51%, rising from ₦20.7 trillion to ₦31.48 trillion, creating ₦10.7 trillion in new retirement wealth in just two years. - 938,229 new contributors enrolled into the Contributory Pension Scheme (CPS),...

21,929 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

13 Kommentare

Profilbild von Ayo
Ayovor 2 Monaten

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu deserves appreciation for the efforts being made to strengthen Nigeria's economy and improve the welfare of retirees. While there is still more work to be done, We appreciate these efforts and hope to see even greater progress for the benefit of all Nigerians.

Profilbild von Evergreen (Oje)
Evergreen (Oje)vor 2 Monaten

It can only get better bigger and brighter with PBAT.

Profilbild von 𝕊𝕀𝕊𝕋𝔸𝕃𝕀𝔸ℕ𝕆 🇳🇬💐
𝕊𝕀𝕊𝕋𝔸𝕃𝕀𝔸ℕ𝕆 🇳🇬💐vor 2 Monaten

Expanding pension coverage by almost one million new contributors is a major step towards securing the future of Nigerian workers. This is how sustainable economic reforms should look.

Profilbild von Muhammad Muhammad Musa
Muhammad Muhammad Musavor 2 Monaten

This actually made me stop scrolling 👏

Profilbild von Abdul bala gusau
Abdul bala gusau vor 2 Monaten

PBAT is Working…

Profilbild von Snr Aluko
Snr Alukovor 2 Monaten

@officialABAT, the Mr. Reformer has started so many economic reforms, the benefits of which we are beginning to see. These reforms are now delivering tangible results as shown in key economic indicators. God bless our uncommon President

Profilbild von THIS IS MATTARRAXXZZEE
THIS IS MATTARRAXXZZEEvor 2 Monaten

Tinubu has kept to his promises

Profilbild von Ali Mamman Lau
Ali Mamman Lauvor 2 Monaten

Tinibunomics Economy reform assured

Profilbild von HMG🧕🏻
HMG🧕🏻vor 2 Monaten

He’s doing great PBAT

Profilbild von Osborne_Osberry
Osborne_Osberryvor 2 Monaten

Nearly one million new contributors (938,229) have joined the Contributory Pension Scheme, expanding retirement security to more Nigerians.

Profilbild von O.G OF SOKOTO🤴🏽
O.G OF SOKOTO🤴🏽vor 2 Monaten

I knew I didn't back rubish. PBAT till 2031

Profilbild von Commyhot1
Commyhot1vor 2 Monaten

Promises made, promises being fulfilled.

Profilbild von Habibu Bello Mayana
Habibu Bello Mayanavor 2 Monaten

May Tinubu succeed.

Ähnliche Videos

This conversation has generated a fair bit of conversation so I think it’s worth elaborating on. There is a common misconception that superannuation is decreasing the number of retirees on the pension. As per ASFA figures attached in comments - the median balance for men and women aged 60-64 is $220k and $164k respectively. That is nowhere near enough to get off the full pension which starts to reduce when a home owning single person has assets of $321k. The pension cuts out entirely if a home owning single person has assets of $714k. In other words, well over half of people about to retire have barely half the level of assets needed to get off the full pension. This is worse than when Superannuation began in 1992 when 77% of retirees were receiving a pension. 50% were receiving a full pension and 27% were receiving a part pension. Furthermore as per the ABS figures attached in comments below, 40% of people now retiree with a mortgage up from 10% in 1992. These figures are over five years old so the figure is probably worse. That means that most people have to cash in their super when they retire to pay off their mortgage and then go onto the pension anyway. Then there is the whole return on investment scenario - if house prices are growing the same as or faster than superannuation returns, then yet again it becomes a false economy. In other words Superannuation is not achieving its stated aim. The Productivity Commission estimates the cost of running Superannuation is around 1% of funds under management or $40 billion per year. Australia doesn’t need more financial engineers in this country, we need real engineers building real assets not paper assets. Nor should we be investing superannuation money overseas in foreign infrastructure when our own country desperately needs more infrastructure investment.

Gerard Rennick

44,183 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

BREAKING: David david friedberg says "California is functionally bankrupt" "People don't realize how screwed California is, & I worry that if California falls, so does the union. "$250 billion to $1 trillion short." "This is because for California to get rescued would be a big cost to red states, & I think it creates in the years ahead a lot of tension." "California's functional bankruptcy is a major risk to the country. & I think we need to figure out what we can change to fix it." How we got here: "California has a public pension system, & that public pension system retirees have paid into it & they get some benefits out, & the amount that they're owed back out is somewhere between $250 billion - $1 trillion dollars more than has been paid in. $250 billion to $1 trillion short. If it was the federal government, it would be like, okay, we'll just print more money. California doesn't have the ability to print money, so California has to pay this out, and you can't restructure retirement benefits. There is a Supreme Court case in California that said that once an employee has been offered retirement benefits, even if they're currently an employee, you can never restructure their retirement benefits. It has to stay forever, and the state cannot declare bankruptcy. There's no way for the state to functionally declare bankruptcy. There's no law to allow it. No state has ever declared bankruptcy, and the retirement benefits sit senior to the bonds in California. So you have to pay out the retirement benefits before you pay out all the bond holders that have loaned California the money that they use to run all their programs and services." Hill & Valley Forum 2026 (The Hill & Valley Forum)

Molly O’Shea

2,673,979 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Surreal exchange with Sunak Janet Street-Porter, "Why do you hate pensioners? That's the only conclusion I can come to as a result of the spring budget" Janet Street-Porter "You lowered National Insurance by 4p.. Big deal.. Pensioners don't pay NI.. Then you froze the tax threshold.. So yes you gave us more pension, but that leaves a gap of only £1,000 before the basic average pension to the threshold to paid tax" "So many pensioners are living in poverty, around 2,000,000. Most are living in private rental accommodation.. So there's an argument that pensioners have come our worse" *Rishi Sunak is smirking as she says this* "Worse under the Tories, worse under you. As a pensioner, what I see is are pensioners who would like to take extra jobs to make ends meet, to buy little treats, to go out once a month, to put petrol in the car" *Rishi Sunak takes a sip from his mug* "But if they earn any money. More than £1,000 a year, and go above that threshold, they're going to be paying tax. Now does that seem right?" Rishi Sunak, "So, Janet, I care deeply about pensioners.. It's really important to me personally.. It was a Conservative government that introduced the triple lock" Janet Street Porter, "I'm not criticising that" Rishi Sunak, "We've protected the triple lock.. That means the state pension has gone up by £900" Janet Street Porter, "I know, but so has the cost of basic living.. You have supplied pension credit, but, there's so many people never claimed them" Rishi Sunak, "All pensioners recieved double their winter fuel payments.. State pension has gone up by £900, far greater than inflation and price rises.. About that pensioner who wants to earn that little bit extra, they don't pay National Insurance.. So they aren't paying tax on that work" Janet Street Porter, "Well they are.." *Rishi Sunak talks over her so she cant repeat the point she just made about earning above the threshold and having to pay tax*

Farrukh

1,107,246 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

⚠️ 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗸 𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘆𝘀 𝗕𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 and where is the mainstream media?⚠️ Here are the 𝗦𝗵𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗣𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁𝘀 exposing how Ottawa is straight-up gaslighting Canadians about our debt crisis: 1. Canada’s “lowest debt in G7” claim is a total scam. • Government brags about 13% net debt-to-GDP (lowest in G7). • TRUTH: They’re counting $890 BILLION in CPP/QPP pension money as “assets” they can use to “offset” debt. • You can’t raid grandma’s pension to pay the Visa bill—that’s fraud accounting. 2. Strip out the pension trick and 𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗮’𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝗯𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗧𝗢𝗣 𝗼𝗳 𝗚𝟳. • Real total debt-to-GDP: 113% (5th-worst in G7). • Worse than UK (103%), Germany (64%), and closing in on France (117%). • Only Japan is worse. Congrats, we’re G7 debt runners-up! 3. Carney’s “transformative” budget is just Trudeau 2.0 on steroids. • Plans to spend MORE, borrow MORE, pile on MORE debt than even Trudeau projected. • Same failed decade-long deficit party, new suit. 4. Canada’s debt exploded FASTER than every other G7 country. • +25 percentage points in 10 years. • Next worst (France): +17. • We’re the G7’s debt-growth champion—nobody else even close. 5. Mark Carney promised to “always be straight” with Canadians. • Then immediately uses the exact same deceptive pension-accounting trick to justify endless deficits. • Straight-up lied in Week 1. Bottom line: The government is deliberately hiding a 113% debt iceberg by waving around a fake 13% “net debt” mirage built on your retirement savings. Classic Ottawa sleight-of-hand. The Fraser Institute @Martyupnorth_2 Kirk Lubimov Clyde Do Something 🇺🇸🇨🇦 Andy Lee Taxpayer.com Franco Terrazzano

Satire Squad HQ

13,012 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten