Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

After Ancient Apocalypse aired, the critical response from mainstream media and academic archaeology was swift and coordinated. Randall went through ten to twelve independent criticisms of the show - from journalists, from archaeologists, from sources presenting themselves as separate and unaffiliated - and found nothing of substance in any...

randallwcarlson's profile picture

Randall Carlson

169,548 subscribers

34,167 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The water erosion visible on the Sphinx is not a minor detail or a contested footnote. It is a geological clock - and Randall reads it directly. The last time significant rainfall occurred in the region of the Giza Plateau was approximately 10,000 years ago. If the erosion pattern on the Sphinx was produced by water rather than wind and sand, as the evidence strongly suggests, then the structure has to be at least that old. Randall states he is 100% on board with that minimum date. The emphasis, however, is on the word minimum. Randall’s position is that the Sphinx is much, much older than 10,000 years - placing it potentially in the same company as the most ancient megalithic remains he has encountered in his exploration, including the extraordinary stonework at Baalbek. The rainfall record gives a floor. The geology, the construction style, and the broader context of what Randall has been finding across multiple ancient sites suggest the ceiling is considerably higher than mainstream archaeology has ever been willing to acknowledge. The Sphinx was not built at the dawn of Egyptian civilization. It may have been ancient even to the ancient Egyptians.
0:38

The water erosion visible on the Sphinx is not a minor detail or a contested footnote. It is a geological clock - and Randall reads it directly. The last time significant rainfall occurred in the region of the Giza Plateau was approximately 10,000 years ago. If the erosion pattern on the Sphinx was produced by water rather than wind and sand, as the evidence strongly suggests, then the structure has to be at least that old. Randall states he is 100% on board with that minimum date. The emphasis, however, is on the word minimum. Randall’s position is that the Sphinx is much, much older than 10,000 years - placing it potentially in the same company as the most ancient megalithic remains he has encountered in his exploration, including the extraordinary stonework at Baalbek. The rainfall record gives a floor. The geology, the construction style, and the broader context of what Randall has been finding across multiple ancient sites suggest the ceiling is considerably higher than mainstream archaeology has ever been willing to acknowledge. The Sphinx was not built at the dawn of Egyptian civilization. It may have been ancient even to the ancient Egyptians.

Randall Carlson

18,513 views • 2 months ago

The assumption that Earth operates as a largely self-contained system - affected by its own geology, its own climate cycles, its own biological processes - is one Randall argues we need to outgrow. This planet is embedded in a cosmic environment, and the evidence that the cosmic domain impinges on the terrestrial far more frequently than previously imagined is now beyond ambiguity. The ancient peoples who were obsessed with the sky were not engaged in superstition. They were paying attention to something that modern science is only now catching up to. The solar constant - the assumed stability of energy output from the sun - is not nearly as constant as the name implies. Randall argues that a significant portion of the changes happening on Earth, changes that are routinely attributed to purely terrestrial causes, are connected to fluctuations and events in the cosmic domain of which Earth is a part. The sky that ancient cultures watched with such intensity was not a backdrop to human history. It was an active participant in it - and Randall argues that thinking cosmically is not an abstract philosophical exercise. It is the only framework large enough to accurately account for what has been happening on this planet throughout human history and what continues to happen now. Spots are limited - click here to join Randall on his upcoming Finger Lakes tour!
0:48

The assumption that Earth operates as a largely self-contained system - affected by its own geology, its own climate cycles, its own biological processes - is one Randall argues we need to outgrow. This planet is embedded in a cosmic environment, and the evidence that the cosmic domain impinges on the terrestrial far more frequently than previously imagined is now beyond ambiguity. The ancient peoples who were obsessed with the sky were not engaged in superstition. They were paying attention to something that modern science is only now catching up to. The solar constant - the assumed stability of energy output from the sun - is not nearly as constant as the name implies. Randall argues that a significant portion of the changes happening on Earth, changes that are routinely attributed to purely terrestrial causes, are connected to fluctuations and events in the cosmic domain of which Earth is a part. The sky that ancient cultures watched with such intensity was not a backdrop to human history. It was an active participant in it - and Randall argues that thinking cosmically is not an abstract philosophical exercise. It is the only framework large enough to accurately account for what has been happening on this planet throughout human history and what continues to happen now. Spots are limited - click here to join Randall on his upcoming Finger Lakes tour!

Randall Carlson

14,458 views • 3 months ago

The ten Sumerian kings who reigned before the Great Flood are recorded as having ruled for a combined total of 432,000 years. Randall is clear that he doesn't take that figure literally - no individual king reigned for 43,200 years. However, the number itself is where the real argument begins. That same numerical sequence is embedded throughout the way modern civilization measures time and space. The moon's diameter is 2,160 miles - precisely half of 4,320, and double 1,080. The recurrence of that figure across Sumerian kingship lists and contemporary astronomical measurement is not coincidental. What Randall draws attention to next is the origin of the mile itself. It is not an arbitrary unit. It derives ultimately from human anatomy and the geometric proportions of the human body - which connects it to the same tradition of sacred geometry and human-cosmic correspondence that Randall traces across multiple ancient cultures. The implication is significant. If the numbers embedded in Sumerian myth are the same numbers encoded in our most basic units of measurement, and if those units trace back to human geometry, then the knowledge system that produced the Sumerian king lists and the one that produced our measurement conventions may share a common and much older source.
0:49

The ten Sumerian kings who reigned before the Great Flood are recorded as having ruled for a combined total of 432,000 years. Randall is clear that he doesn't take that figure literally - no individual king reigned for 43,200 years. However, the number itself is where the real argument begins. That same numerical sequence is embedded throughout the way modern civilization measures time and space. The moon's diameter is 2,160 miles - precisely half of 4,320, and double 1,080. The recurrence of that figure across Sumerian kingship lists and contemporary astronomical measurement is not coincidental. What Randall draws attention to next is the origin of the mile itself. It is not an arbitrary unit. It derives ultimately from human anatomy and the geometric proportions of the human body - which connects it to the same tradition of sacred geometry and human-cosmic correspondence that Randall traces across multiple ancient cultures. The implication is significant. If the numbers embedded in Sumerian myth are the same numbers encoded in our most basic units of measurement, and if those units trace back to human geometry, then the knowledge system that produced the Sumerian king lists and the one that produced our measurement conventions may share a common and much older source.

Randall Carlson

101,602 views • 4 months ago

The latest skeletal evidence places anatomically modern humans on Earth somewhere between 180,000 and 200,000 years ago. That is approximately 7,000 generations of people biologically identical to us - with the same brains, the same cognitive capacity, and presumably the same drive to organise, build, and innovate. And yet, by the conventional account, civilisation only appeared in the last few hundred generations. The question Randall Carlson raises is not rhetorical. It is one of the most uncomfortable in all of science. How is it that across all those long generations, nothing we would recognise as civilisation took root and flourished? The most parsimonious answer, Randall argues, may not be that civilisation simply hadn't started yet. It may be that it had - and that what we are living in now is not the origin of human civilisation, but its reboot.
0:52

The latest skeletal evidence places anatomically modern humans on Earth somewhere between 180,000 and 200,000 years ago. That is approximately 7,000 generations of people biologically identical to us - with the same brains, the same cognitive capacity, and presumably the same drive to organise, build, and innovate. And yet, by the conventional account, civilisation only appeared in the last few hundred generations. The question Randall Carlson raises is not rhetorical. It is one of the most uncomfortable in all of science. How is it that across all those long generations, nothing we would recognise as civilisation took root and flourished? The most parsimonious answer, Randall argues, may not be that civilisation simply hadn't started yet. It may be that it had - and that what we are living in now is not the origin of human civilisation, but its reboot.

Randall Carlson

582,115 views • 4 months ago

The Freemasons did not invent the title of Great Architect for God arbitrarily. Randall traces it to a specific and ancient understanding - that the universe was built according to geometry, that all of creation carries that geometry inherently within it, and that the role of the master builder was not to express personal creativity but to replicate the processes by which God constructed reality itself. The grand geometric mean - another name Randall notes the Freemasons apply to the divine - points to the same conclusion. Mathematics and divinity were never separate categories in this tradition. They were the same thing viewed from different angles. What Randall finds most compelling is the point at which observation overtakes skepticism. The geometry is there. It appears in the proportions of living organisms, in the structure of galaxies, in the dimensions of ancient monuments, and in the relationships between celestial bodies. Randall’s position is straightforward - there is a threshold beyond which dismissing this as coincidence is no longer intellectually honest. Once you begin looking for the geometry of creation, it becomes impossible to stop finding it. The ancient master builders understood that - and everything they built was a deliberate act of alignment with a geometric order they believed was not invented by human minds but discovered within a universe that was already built that way from the beginning.
0:33

The Freemasons did not invent the title of Great Architect for God arbitrarily. Randall traces it to a specific and ancient understanding - that the universe was built according to geometry, that all of creation carries that geometry inherently within it, and that the role of the master builder was not to express personal creativity but to replicate the processes by which God constructed reality itself. The grand geometric mean - another name Randall notes the Freemasons apply to the divine - points to the same conclusion. Mathematics and divinity were never separate categories in this tradition. They were the same thing viewed from different angles. What Randall finds most compelling is the point at which observation overtakes skepticism. The geometry is there. It appears in the proportions of living organisms, in the structure of galaxies, in the dimensions of ancient monuments, and in the relationships between celestial bodies. Randall’s position is straightforward - there is a threshold beyond which dismissing this as coincidence is no longer intellectually honest. Once you begin looking for the geometry of creation, it becomes impossible to stop finding it. The ancient master builders understood that - and everything they built was a deliberate act of alignment with a geometric order they believed was not invented by human minds but discovered within a universe that was already built that way from the beginning.

Randall Carlson

11,848 views • 3 months ago

The suppression Graham Hancock experiences in archaeology is not an isolated institutional quirk. It is, he argues, a small slice of a much larger pattern - governments and leadership structures that treat adult citizens as children incapable of handling information, and that actively work to control what narrative reaches the public. Joe Rogan sharpens that point directly - when people have control of information, they want to retain it. Graham’s conclusion is unambiguous. The leadership of this planet is full of deception from beginning to end. Joe finds at least one source of hope in that bleak assessment - the resurgence of interest in psychedelics as a avenue outside institutional control. Randall builds on that with a concrete example of another way through. Ben Jonson, when asked how he obtained his license, described walking into congressional offices with around a dozen of his Navy SEAL colleagues and making clear that approval was not optional. The congressmen, faced with that particular group of constituents, found themselves unable to back down. The official channels may be compromised - but as all three speakers suggest in different ways, there are other paths to the same destination.
0:51

The suppression Graham Hancock experiences in archaeology is not an isolated institutional quirk. It is, he argues, a small slice of a much larger pattern - governments and leadership structures that treat adult citizens as children incapable of handling information, and that actively work to control what narrative reaches the public. Joe Rogan sharpens that point directly - when people have control of information, they want to retain it. Graham’s conclusion is unambiguous. The leadership of this planet is full of deception from beginning to end. Joe finds at least one source of hope in that bleak assessment - the resurgence of interest in psychedelics as a avenue outside institutional control. Randall builds on that with a concrete example of another way through. Ben Jonson, when asked how he obtained his license, described walking into congressional offices with around a dozen of his Navy SEAL colleagues and making clear that approval was not optional. The congressmen, faced with that particular group of constituents, found themselves unable to back down. The official channels may be compromised - but as all three speakers suggest in different ways, there are other paths to the same destination.

Randall Carlson

20,047 views • 3 months ago

#MLBMovieSpoilers not to be that person but reminder that this is not the same gabriel from the show and it doesnt erase his abuse there, this version of him doesnt take advantage of adrien and shows remorse as soon as he sees him hurt, they're not the same
0:41

#MLBMovieSpoilers not to be that person but reminder that this is not the same gabriel from the show and it doesnt erase his abuse there, this version of him doesnt take advantage of adrien and shows remorse as soon as he sees him hurt, they're not the same

nico 🎄

30,575 views • 3 years ago

The machines Randall describes operate on a principle that connects directly to his broader research into plasma and toroidal geometry. Microscopic cavitation bubbles are generated and subjected to rapid alternating cycles of vacuum and pressure - produced naturally by the up and down motion of pistons in any conventional engine configuration. The compression phase and vacuum phase act on those bubbles in sequence, and what happens next is the detail Randall finds significant. The cavitation bubbles collapse on their axes and form perfect torus shapes - spontaneously, consistently, and in a way that initiates the same plasma self-organization process he has been tracing across ancient energy systems and sacred geometry traditions. The practical implication is that these toroidal plasma voids can be harvested directly from the machine producing them. Randall points to the vortex tube as a concrete demonstration of the underlying physics - a device that accepts air at room temperature and separates it into two counter-rotating vortices, one inside the other, spinning in opposite directions. The result is a temperature differential of up to several hundred degrees between the hot and cold ends, produced without any additional energy input. Randall’s argument is that this is not an isolated engineering curiosity. It is a visible, reproducible demonstration of the same principles that ancient plasma-based energy systems were built around - and that the machines now being developed around cavitation and toroidal geometry may be the closest modern technology has come to recovering what was lost.
1:14

The machines Randall describes operate on a principle that connects directly to his broader research into plasma and toroidal geometry. Microscopic cavitation bubbles are generated and subjected to rapid alternating cycles of vacuum and pressure - produced naturally by the up and down motion of pistons in any conventional engine configuration. The compression phase and vacuum phase act on those bubbles in sequence, and what happens next is the detail Randall finds significant. The cavitation bubbles collapse on their axes and form perfect torus shapes - spontaneously, consistently, and in a way that initiates the same plasma self-organization process he has been tracing across ancient energy systems and sacred geometry traditions. The practical implication is that these toroidal plasma voids can be harvested directly from the machine producing them. Randall points to the vortex tube as a concrete demonstration of the underlying physics - a device that accepts air at room temperature and separates it into two counter-rotating vortices, one inside the other, spinning in opposite directions. The result is a temperature differential of up to several hundred degrees between the hot and cold ends, produced without any additional energy input. Randall’s argument is that this is not an isolated engineering curiosity. It is a visible, reproducible demonstration of the same principles that ancient plasma-based energy systems were built around - and that the machines now being developed around cavitation and toroidal geometry may be the closest modern technology has come to recovering what was lost.

Randall Carlson

22,749 views • 3 months ago

Randall holds a position that he frames not as speculation but as a scientific probability - levitation was a genuine technological reality for ancient cultures, and the evidence for it is hiding in plain sight within the most well known sacred object in biblical history. The Ark of the Covenant was sheathed in gold, making it extraordinarily heavy - and yet the accounts are consistent that no one could touch it directly. It was carried on staves by a single tribe, the Levites, the only one among the twelve tribes of Israel permitted to transport it. The linguistic detail Randall encountered while studying mystery traditions like Kabbalah - traditions that hold hidden meanings within language itself - stopped him in his tracks. Levites. Levitation. He presents it not as definitive proof but as the kind of coincidence that, once noticed, refuses to be dismissed. A tribe whose name encodes the very phenomenon that would explain how they moved an object too heavy and too dangerous for ordinary human handling - chosen specifically and exclusively for that task - is a detail Randall argues deserves considerably more scrutiny than it has received. The Kabbalah tradition's insistence that words conceal their deepest meanings may, in this case, have preserved a technical truth hidden in a name for thousands of years.
0:42

Randall holds a position that he frames not as speculation but as a scientific probability - levitation was a genuine technological reality for ancient cultures, and the evidence for it is hiding in plain sight within the most well known sacred object in biblical history. The Ark of the Covenant was sheathed in gold, making it extraordinarily heavy - and yet the accounts are consistent that no one could touch it directly. It was carried on staves by a single tribe, the Levites, the only one among the twelve tribes of Israel permitted to transport it. The linguistic detail Randall encountered while studying mystery traditions like Kabbalah - traditions that hold hidden meanings within language itself - stopped him in his tracks. Levites. Levitation. He presents it not as definitive proof but as the kind of coincidence that, once noticed, refuses to be dismissed. A tribe whose name encodes the very phenomenon that would explain how they moved an object too heavy and too dangerous for ordinary human handling - chosen specifically and exclusively for that task - is a detail Randall argues deserves considerably more scrutiny than it has received. The Kabbalah tradition's insistence that words conceal their deepest meanings may, in this case, have preserved a technical truth hidden in a name for thousands of years.

Randall Carlson

51,157 views • 3 months ago

Kennedy Agyapong has apologized to his supporters for not informing them before joining the Vice President and his campaign team on the Ashanti Regional campaign tour. He made it clear that he has not resigned from the NPP and is not considering running as an independent candidate. He urged the supporters of the Vice President and his own supporters to unite ahead of the December elections.
2:49

Kennedy Agyapong has apologized to his supporters for not informing them before joining the Vice President and his campaign team on the Ashanti Regional campaign tour. He made it clear that he has not resigned from the NPP and is not considering running as an independent candidate. He urged the supporters of the Vice President and his own supporters to unite ahead of the December elections.

EDHUB🌍ℹ

208,674 views • 2 years ago

The angular relationship between two edges of a pentagon is 108 degrees - a geometric property embedded in one of the most fundamental forms in sacred geometry. How long has that knowledge existed? Randall argues the accumulated evidence points in only one direction. Advanced civilizations existed in the deep human past - leaving very little record, but enough. Enough that approached from the right perspective the conclusion becomes difficult to avoid. Graham Hancock has been making that argument for decades and Randall notes the evidence is increasingly vindicating it. Human history is deeper and more complex than the mainstream has ever been willing to accommodate. The primary reason it took this long to recognize is the mirror problem - if an ancient civilization does not look like what we have already built, we do not recognize it as civilization at all. We are searching for our own reflection in the ancient record. That search is being overturned by evidence of a historical depth inseparably linked to repeated cycles of catastrophe that have reset the human story more than once.
1:10

The angular relationship between two edges of a pentagon is 108 degrees - a geometric property embedded in one of the most fundamental forms in sacred geometry. How long has that knowledge existed? Randall argues the accumulated evidence points in only one direction. Advanced civilizations existed in the deep human past - leaving very little record, but enough. Enough that approached from the right perspective the conclusion becomes difficult to avoid. Graham Hancock has been making that argument for decades and Randall notes the evidence is increasingly vindicating it. Human history is deeper and more complex than the mainstream has ever been willing to accommodate. The primary reason it took this long to recognize is the mirror problem - if an ancient civilization does not look like what we have already built, we do not recognize it as civilization at all. We are searching for our own reflection in the ancient record. That search is being overturned by evidence of a historical depth inseparably linked to repeated cycles of catastrophe that have reset the human story more than once.

Randall Carlson

12,809 views • 1 month ago

The fingerprints of an advanced predecessor culture are visible across the ancient world. Randall’s question is not whether they exist - he considers the evidence for that overwhelming - but who left them, and what the nature of their knowledge actually was. The term he reaches for is sacred science - a deliberate fusion of what modern thinking has artificially separated into religion and physics, spirituality and technology. That separation, Randall argues, is a recent invention. It did not exist in the knowledge systems of the cultures that preceded us. The framework Randall builds on is Arthur C. Clarke's observation that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic - and by extension, from the miraculous. A civilization practicing sacred science would have produced phenomena that later cultures could only interpret through a spiritual lens, because the scientific framework needed to recognize it as technology had been lost along with everything else. Randall’s position is that this is precisely what happened - that predecessor cultures were operating within a unified system where science and spirituality were a single discipline, and that the fingerprints they left behind are the residue of that holy science waiting to be correctly read.
0:45

The fingerprints of an advanced predecessor culture are visible across the ancient world. Randall’s question is not whether they exist - he considers the evidence for that overwhelming - but who left them, and what the nature of their knowledge actually was. The term he reaches for is sacred science - a deliberate fusion of what modern thinking has artificially separated into religion and physics, spirituality and technology. That separation, Randall argues, is a recent invention. It did not exist in the knowledge systems of the cultures that preceded us. The framework Randall builds on is Arthur C. Clarke's observation that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic - and by extension, from the miraculous. A civilization practicing sacred science would have produced phenomena that later cultures could only interpret through a spiritual lens, because the scientific framework needed to recognize it as technology had been lost along with everything else. Randall’s position is that this is precisely what happened - that predecessor cultures were operating within a unified system where science and spirituality were a single discipline, and that the fingerprints they left behind are the residue of that holy science waiting to be correctly read.

Randall Carlson

11,737 views • 4 months ago

At 11,600 years ago there was a catastrophic sea level rise event - Meltwater pulse 1B - documented in the marine geological record. Plato's account of the demise of Atlantis, transmitted through a chain of sources from Solon through Critias the Elder to Critias the Younger and finally to Socrates and Plato himself, places the sinking of Atlantis at the same moment. The mechanism Plato describes is precise - earthquake and rapid sea level rise. The geological record at that precise date shows exactly that. Randall is not prepared to dismiss that convergence as coincidence - and he states that position directly. A skeptic would call it coincidence. Randall finds that response insufficient when the date, the mechanism, and the geographical framework all align simultaneously. Plato was not describing a metaphor or a moral fable. He was transmitting a chronology received from Egyptian sources that places the subsidence of a mid-Atlantic landmass at precisely the moment the marine geology shows a catastrophic pulse of meltwater entering the world's oceans. The two accounts - one preserved in Greek philosophical dialogue, the other recorded in the sedimentary record of the ocean floor - are describing the same event from opposite ends of the evidence. Click here to step into the field with Randall and unlock the hidden story of the Finger Lakes on his upcoming tour 👇
0:37

At 11,600 years ago there was a catastrophic sea level rise event - Meltwater pulse 1B - documented in the marine geological record. Plato's account of the demise of Atlantis, transmitted through a chain of sources from Solon through Critias the Elder to Critias the Younger and finally to Socrates and Plato himself, places the sinking of Atlantis at the same moment. The mechanism Plato describes is precise - earthquake and rapid sea level rise. The geological record at that precise date shows exactly that. Randall is not prepared to dismiss that convergence as coincidence - and he states that position directly. A skeptic would call it coincidence. Randall finds that response insufficient when the date, the mechanism, and the geographical framework all align simultaneously. Plato was not describing a metaphor or a moral fable. He was transmitting a chronology received from Egyptian sources that places the subsidence of a mid-Atlantic landmass at precisely the moment the marine geology shows a catastrophic pulse of meltwater entering the world's oceans. The two accounts - one preserved in Greek philosophical dialogue, the other recorded in the sedimentary record of the ocean floor - are describing the same event from opposite ends of the evidence. Click here to step into the field with Randall and unlock the hidden story of the Finger Lakes on his upcoming tour 👇

Randall Carlson

10,618 views • 3 months ago

In Padua, I sat with a psychiatrist, a radiologist, and a man who has been in this fight since 1991. The psychiatrist started treating COVID vaccine injury and is getting results with augmented NAC and other protocols. What she also sees is the effect on children. A generation now questioning vaccines, carrying that uncertainty, and what it is doing to mental health across Italian society. She is watching it all from a clinical chair. The radiologist had no objection to the vaccine - his objection was to being told he had no choice. He made that position public, lost his job, and has been living with the consequences since. He is back now but the reinstatement didn't change the pressure. He channeled it into leading one of the major organizations here that funds people who stood their ground for the same reason. The third man refused to vaccinate his child in 1991 and the Italian government tried to take his children from him. He has been running the country's largest vaccine choice organization ever since. You realize, talking to people like this, that the ocean between us is not as wide as it looks. We have the same fight, same costs, and its the same people refusing to let it go.
1:12

In Padua, I sat with a psychiatrist, a radiologist, and a man who has been in this fight since 1991. The psychiatrist started treating COVID vaccine injury and is getting results with augmented NAC and other protocols. What she also sees is the effect on children. A generation now questioning vaccines, carrying that uncertainty, and what it is doing to mental health across Italian society. She is watching it all from a clinical chair. The radiologist had no objection to the vaccine - his objection was to being told he had no choice. He made that position public, lost his job, and has been living with the consequences since. He is back now but the reinstatement didn't change the pressure. He channeled it into leading one of the major organizations here that funds people who stood their ground for the same reason. The third man refused to vaccinate his child in 1991 and the Italian government tried to take his children from him. He has been running the country's largest vaccine choice organization ever since. You realize, talking to people like this, that the ocean between us is not as wide as it looks. We have the same fight, same costs, and its the same people refusing to let it go.

Del Bigtree

22,258 views • 1 month ago

WATCH: CNN’s John Miller mentions the video and notes left behind by the alleged Minneapolis Catholic church shooter, citing their mental illness and the working motive is “he was in pain,” but NOTHING about the shooter being transgender and that they hated Christians, Jews, and Trump... Well, we’ve been looking into the shooter who law enforcement sources have identified as Robin Westman and police have been examining some of the postings online by an individual of the same name, presumed to be the same individual. It shows numerous weapons, magazines, things in preparation for the shooting along with a book and different notes. But one of them is particularly telling in that it says: ‘I have waited for this for so long. I am not well. I am not right. I am a sad person, haunted by these thoughts that do not go away. I know this is wrong’ and he goes on to describe that the action he is going to take against this world before taking his own life — which is not uncommon in these incidents, these active shooter scenarios where you see someone who reports to be in — in — in pain and trauma and that they write all of this out and leave it behind with the foreknowledge that what they're about to do is going to end their own life as well, while taking these — these strangers, these innocent people with them in the process. But investigators are going back through this material and a lot of other material trying to determine motive. So what do we know? I mean, what we know, if this in fact is from the shooter, that his motive was he was in pain. But what we don't see here and there's more to go through is what was, what was the shooter — Robin Westman in pain about specifically?”
1:41

WATCH: CNN’s John Miller mentions the video and notes left behind by the alleged Minneapolis Catholic church shooter, citing their mental illness and the working motive is “he was in pain,” but NOTHING about the shooter being transgender and that they hated Christians, Jews, and Trump... Well, we’ve been looking into the shooter who law enforcement sources have identified as Robin Westman and police have been examining some of the postings online by an individual of the same name, presumed to be the same individual. It shows numerous weapons, magazines, things in preparation for the shooting along with a book and different notes. But one of them is particularly telling in that it says: ‘I have waited for this for so long. I am not well. I am not right. I am a sad person, haunted by these thoughts that do not go away. I know this is wrong’ and he goes on to describe that the action he is going to take against this world before taking his own life — which is not uncommon in these incidents, these active shooter scenarios where you see someone who reports to be in — in — in pain and trauma and that they write all of this out and leave it behind with the foreknowledge that what they're about to do is going to end their own life as well, while taking these — these strangers, these innocent people with them in the process. But investigators are going back through this material and a lot of other material trying to determine motive. So what do we know? I mean, what we know, if this in fact is from the shooter, that his motive was he was in pain. But what we don't see here and there's more to go through is what was, what was the shooter — Robin Westman in pain about specifically?”

Curtis Houck

64,113 views • 10 months ago

There’s a new claim that “essentially, all that happened was Trump got tired, took control and forced it on Netanyahu, and this is basically the same deal that could have been reached a year earlier,” with the disturbing implication, that’s horrible to say, that IDF soldiers died in vain for a cause that had already been achieved. So, let’s revisit the plans that were laid out by both the current and former American administrations to see if they match up. For example, the Biden plan from June 1, 2024, which was met with considerable enthusiasm, and was even later acknowledged as Netanyahu’s plan. I want to highlight the difference. In the first phase, the IDF should have already pulled back to roughly its current position, and then it was just about releasing humanitarian hostages. As if not all of them are “humanitarian.” Then it transitioned to discussing the release of living hostages. In this phase, the IDF would withdraw from all of Gaza, until the last centimetre, while all the dead hostages remain in Gaza. It’s as different as day and night. Here, everyone is returning, including the dead, and the IDF is still in half of Gaza. This isn’t just about some desire to maintain an occupation or garrison force, but rather to ensure that Hamas disarms — something that didn’t happen in the Biden proposal. So now let’s move on to the Witkoff plan, much closer to us, much better for Israel, but still different. There was talk of releasing half of the dead hostages, but then a temporary ceasefire for two months of negotiations to end the war, and then the IDF would withdraw from more places than it is now, and there would be a guarantee that the war would not be renewed. Once again, we see that there was no connection between the IDF remaining on the ground and the promise that Hamas would disarm, especially while some of the hostages are still there. The greatness of this outline is this issue. I also want to say something general about the matter of responsibility. As ridiculous as it was on October 7 and afterwards to hear from Netanyahu’s supporters that the one who is to blame is the IDF chief of staff, the Shin Bet chief, the attorney general and the Military Advocate General, and that Netanyahu has no part in it — it’s as ridiculous as it is that now they’re saying, “Thank you Trump and thank you Nitzan Alon, and thank you to all of them and to the Qatari prime minister, and Netanyahu and Ron Dermer have nothing to do with it at all.” Indeed, Netanyahu had a very large part in the failure of October 7, and he also has a very large part together with Dermer in this deal. By the way, how does that connect to what Kushner said tonight in Egypt? He said that both the prime minister and Dermer made very big compromises and took risks to see the end of the war. I would like to make a suggestion. Once upon a time, when there was only one channel and people didn’t like the commentators, they said, “Watch the game without the commentary.” I say, let’s watch Trump and Netanyahu’s move without the commentary, because there are a lot of conversations, and this and that, and slander, and sometimes even quotes, but in practice there has never been a president and a prime minister who acted like this, and the results are evident from Iran, through the Golan Heights, through the embassy and now Gaza.
2:39

There’s a new claim that “essentially, all that happened was Trump got tired, took control and forced it on Netanyahu, and this is basically the same deal that could have been reached a year earlier,” with the disturbing implication, that’s horrible to say, that IDF soldiers died in vain for a cause that had already been achieved. So, let’s revisit the plans that were laid out by both the current and former American administrations to see if they match up. For example, the Biden plan from June 1, 2024, which was met with considerable enthusiasm, and was even later acknowledged as Netanyahu’s plan. I want to highlight the difference. In the first phase, the IDF should have already pulled back to roughly its current position, and then it was just about releasing humanitarian hostages. As if not all of them are “humanitarian.” Then it transitioned to discussing the release of living hostages. In this phase, the IDF would withdraw from all of Gaza, until the last centimetre, while all the dead hostages remain in Gaza. It’s as different as day and night. Here, everyone is returning, including the dead, and the IDF is still in half of Gaza. This isn’t just about some desire to maintain an occupation or garrison force, but rather to ensure that Hamas disarms — something that didn’t happen in the Biden proposal. So now let’s move on to the Witkoff plan, much closer to us, much better for Israel, but still different. There was talk of releasing half of the dead hostages, but then a temporary ceasefire for two months of negotiations to end the war, and then the IDF would withdraw from more places than it is now, and there would be a guarantee that the war would not be renewed. Once again, we see that there was no connection between the IDF remaining on the ground and the promise that Hamas would disarm, especially while some of the hostages are still there. The greatness of this outline is this issue. I also want to say something general about the matter of responsibility. As ridiculous as it was on October 7 and afterwards to hear from Netanyahu’s supporters that the one who is to blame is the IDF chief of staff, the Shin Bet chief, the attorney general and the Military Advocate General, and that Netanyahu has no part in it — it’s as ridiculous as it is that now they’re saying, “Thank you Trump and thank you Nitzan Alon, and thank you to all of them and to the Qatari prime minister, and Netanyahu and Ron Dermer have nothing to do with it at all.” Indeed, Netanyahu had a very large part in the failure of October 7, and he also has a very large part together with Dermer in this deal. By the way, how does that connect to what Kushner said tonight in Egypt? He said that both the prime minister and Dermer made very big compromises and took risks to see the end of the war. I would like to make a suggestion. Once upon a time, when there was only one channel and people didn’t like the commentators, they said, “Watch the game without the commentary.” I say, let’s watch Trump and Netanyahu’s move without the commentary, because there are a lot of conversations, and this and that, and slander, and sometimes even quotes, but in practice there has never been a president and a prime minister who acted like this, and the results are evident from Iran, through the Golan Heights, through the embassy and now Gaza.

Amit Segal

298,292 views • 9 months ago

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.
6:07

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

21,983 views • 2 months ago

The Epic of Resistance 🎼 This is not just a symphony. This is what resistance sounds like. Composed by Majid Entezami, the Epic of Khorramshahr is not played… it is remembered. It carries the echo of the Battle of Khorramshahr during the Iran–Iraq War... when a city was shattered and occupied… then reclaimed by a people who refused to disappear. They believed fire would silence it. They believed steel would break it. They believed time would erase it. But they misunderstood something fundamental: You can destroy buildings… but not belief. You can occupy land… but not dignity. Listen. The violins do not mourn defeat— they rise like voices from beneath the dust. The drums are not war— they are the pulse of a nation that never stopped beating. The crescendo is not sound— it is return. Like Jerusalem… Khorramshahr fell— and then Khorramshahr rose — and so too will Jerusalem. And in its rising, a message was written into history: That oppression is loud… but resistance is eternal. Today, the same rhythm echoes— in every people who refuse humiliation, in every nation that stands when it is told to kneel, in every voice that says: enough. The oppressed the world over, do not hear this music as the past— but as a covenant. A promise carried across generations: That injustice exhausts itself. That arrogance overreaches. That truth, though tested, does not break. This is why the melody does not end. It advances— from rubble to resistance, from resistance to resurgence, from resurgence to victory. History has a pattern: Empires arrive with certainty. They leave with silence. But those who endure— write the final verse. And so the symphony continues… not as memory alone— but as prophecy. Victory is not a moment. It is a direction. And those who refuse to surrender are already moving toward it… They see victory—and joy and smiles— in Tehran and Gaza, in Beirut and Sana’a, in Baghdad and Jerusalem… in every city with a resisting soul and a tight fist... as candle by candle is rekindled, and as light by light is ignited across the world… until the darkness fades, until racism ends, and until supremacism dismantled.
2:52

The Epic of Resistance 🎼 This is not just a symphony. This is what resistance sounds like. Composed by Majid Entezami, the Epic of Khorramshahr is not played… it is remembered. It carries the echo of the Battle of Khorramshahr during the Iran–Iraq War... when a city was shattered and occupied… then reclaimed by a people who refused to disappear. They believed fire would silence it. They believed steel would break it. They believed time would erase it. But they misunderstood something fundamental: You can destroy buildings… but not belief. You can occupy land… but not dignity. Listen. The violins do not mourn defeat— they rise like voices from beneath the dust. The drums are not war— they are the pulse of a nation that never stopped beating. The crescendo is not sound— it is return. Like Jerusalem… Khorramshahr fell— and then Khorramshahr rose — and so too will Jerusalem. And in its rising, a message was written into history: That oppression is loud… but resistance is eternal. Today, the same rhythm echoes— in every people who refuse humiliation, in every nation that stands when it is told to kneel, in every voice that says: enough. The oppressed the world over, do not hear this music as the past— but as a covenant. A promise carried across generations: That injustice exhausts itself. That arrogance overreaches. That truth, though tested, does not break. This is why the melody does not end. It advances— from rubble to resistance, from resistance to resurgence, from resurgence to victory. History has a pattern: Empires arrive with certainty. They leave with silence. But those who endure— write the final verse. And so the symphony continues… not as memory alone— but as prophecy. Victory is not a moment. It is a direction. And those who refuse to surrender are already moving toward it… They see victory—and joy and smiles— in Tehran and Gaza, in Beirut and Sana’a, in Baghdad and Jerusalem… in every city with a resisting soul and a tight fist... as candle by candle is rekindled, and as light by light is ignited across the world… until the darkness fades, until racism ends, and until supremacism dismantled.

Sami Al-Arian

102,672 views • 3 months ago

The death and resurrection of a divine king is not a uniquely Christian idea. Randall Carlson points out that the archetype precedes Christianity by thousands of years, appearing across multiple ancient traditions long before the Gospel narratives were written. That context alone raises the question of what relationship the story of Jesus bears to the much older mythological pattern it so closely mirrors. The outrageous hypothesis Randall entertains is that Jesus did not die on the cross in the way the standard account presents - and that reading the Gospels carefully, with attention to the specific details rather than the broad narrative, produces something that looks less like spontaneous historical events and more like a pre-planned ritual being executed with deliberate precision. He stops short of asserting this, but argues the case is plausible and that the details are there in the text for anyone willing to look.
0:39

The death and resurrection of a divine king is not a uniquely Christian idea. Randall Carlson points out that the archetype precedes Christianity by thousands of years, appearing across multiple ancient traditions long before the Gospel narratives were written. That context alone raises the question of what relationship the story of Jesus bears to the much older mythological pattern it so closely mirrors. The outrageous hypothesis Randall entertains is that Jesus did not die on the cross in the way the standard account presents - and that reading the Gospels carefully, with attention to the specific details rather than the broad narrative, produces something that looks less like spontaneous historical events and more like a pre-planned ritual being executed with deliberate precision. He stops short of asserting this, but argues the case is plausible and that the details are there in the text for anyone willing to look.

Randall Carlson

10,173 views • 2 months ago

This may be the strongest evidence for the location of Atlantis yet. Independent geologist Randall Carlson just visited the Azores. And he revealed to Graham Hancock why he’s convinced this was most likely the heart of ancient Atlantean civilization: “There’s definitely evidence that’s consistent with catastrophic episodes in the recent geological past.” “After a detailed reading of multiple translations of Plato’s two relevant dialogues, Timaeus and Critias, and having some knowledge of the marine geology … it looks to me like of all the possible candidates that have been proposed for the locus of the Atlantean civilization, the one that seems to fit Plato’s very precise details … the most, in my mind, is the Azores.” “It has a lot of the earmarks of having undergone catastrophic subsidence in the very recent geological past.” “Plato’s description of geography is very consistent, beyond the west of the Pillars of Heracles, you encounter islands, and then beyond those is the island complex of Atlantis.” “And then beyond that, as he describes it, is the true continent—” Hancock: “Which we have to read as the Americas.” Carlson: “The nine islands of the Azores have their roots in the microcontinent, as it’s called, and they’re essentially mountains … whose peaks are above sea level.” “We had a professional geologist traveling with us, and he admitted, yes, there is evidence here that would be more consistent with a continental bedrock than oceanic bedrock.” Graham Hancock Randall Carlson
5:44

This may be the strongest evidence for the location of Atlantis yet. Independent geologist Randall Carlson just visited the Azores. And he revealed to Graham Hancock why he’s convinced this was most likely the heart of ancient Atlantean civilization: “There’s definitely evidence that’s consistent with catastrophic episodes in the recent geological past.” “After a detailed reading of multiple translations of Plato’s two relevant dialogues, Timaeus and Critias, and having some knowledge of the marine geology … it looks to me like of all the possible candidates that have been proposed for the locus of the Atlantean civilization, the one that seems to fit Plato’s very precise details … the most, in my mind, is the Azores.” “It has a lot of the earmarks of having undergone catastrophic subsidence in the very recent geological past.” “Plato’s description of geography is very consistent, beyond the west of the Pillars of Heracles, you encounter islands, and then beyond those is the island complex of Atlantis.” “And then beyond that, as he describes it, is the true continent—” Hancock: “Which we have to read as the Americas.” Carlson: “The nine islands of the Azores have their roots in the microcontinent, as it’s called, and they’re essentially mountains … whose peaks are above sea level.” “We had a professional geologist traveling with us, and he admitted, yes, there is evidence here that would be more consistent with a continental bedrock than oceanic bedrock.” Graham Hancock Randall Carlson

Holden Culotta

51,789 views • 6 months ago