Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Randall holds a position that he frames not as speculation but as a scientific probability - levitation was a genuine technological reality for ancient cultures, and the evidence for it is hiding in plain sight within the most well known sacred object in biblical history. The Ark of the...

randallwcarlson's profile picture

Randall Carlson

169,526 subscribers

51,196 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Ancient cultures likely accessed energy forms orders of magnitude more efficient than modern technology. Harnessed Earth energy to move massive objects. Levitation was probably scientific reality to them. The Ark of the Covenant: gold-sheathed, extremely heavy, couldn't be touched. Only one tribe of the 12 was allowed to transport it. The Levites. Levites. Levitate. Levitation. The tribe responsible for moving the electrically-charged Ark shares its name with the technology that would make touchless transport possible. Coincidence? Or linguistic preservation of lost scientific capability?
0:48

Ancient cultures likely accessed energy forms orders of magnitude more efficient than modern technology. Harnessed Earth energy to move massive objects. Levitation was probably scientific reality to them. The Ark of the Covenant: gold-sheathed, extremely heavy, couldn't be touched. Only one tribe of the 12 was allowed to transport it. The Levites. Levites. Levitate. Levitation. The tribe responsible for moving the electrically-charged Ark shares its name with the technology that would make touchless transport possible. Coincidence? Or linguistic preservation of lost scientific capability?

Randall Carlson

32,594 views • 6 months ago

The Freemasons did not invent the title of Great Architect for God arbitrarily. Randall traces it to a specific and ancient understanding - that the universe was built according to geometry, that all of creation carries that geometry inherently within it, and that the role of the master builder was not to express personal creativity but to replicate the processes by which God constructed reality itself. The grand geometric mean - another name Randall notes the Freemasons apply to the divine - points to the same conclusion. Mathematics and divinity were never separate categories in this tradition. They were the same thing viewed from different angles. What Randall finds most compelling is the point at which observation overtakes skepticism. The geometry is there. It appears in the proportions of living organisms, in the structure of galaxies, in the dimensions of ancient monuments, and in the relationships between celestial bodies. Randall’s position is straightforward - there is a threshold beyond which dismissing this as coincidence is no longer intellectually honest. Once you begin looking for the geometry of creation, it becomes impossible to stop finding it. The ancient master builders understood that - and everything they built was a deliberate act of alignment with a geometric order they believed was not invented by human minds but discovered within a universe that was already built that way from the beginning.
0:33

The Freemasons did not invent the title of Great Architect for God arbitrarily. Randall traces it to a specific and ancient understanding - that the universe was built according to geometry, that all of creation carries that geometry inherently within it, and that the role of the master builder was not to express personal creativity but to replicate the processes by which God constructed reality itself. The grand geometric mean - another name Randall notes the Freemasons apply to the divine - points to the same conclusion. Mathematics and divinity were never separate categories in this tradition. They were the same thing viewed from different angles. What Randall finds most compelling is the point at which observation overtakes skepticism. The geometry is there. It appears in the proportions of living organisms, in the structure of galaxies, in the dimensions of ancient monuments, and in the relationships between celestial bodies. Randall’s position is straightforward - there is a threshold beyond which dismissing this as coincidence is no longer intellectually honest. Once you begin looking for the geometry of creation, it becomes impossible to stop finding it. The ancient master builders understood that - and everything they built was a deliberate act of alignment with a geometric order they believed was not invented by human minds but discovered within a universe that was already built that way from the beginning.

Randall Carlson

11,848 views • 4 months ago

The angular relationship between two edges of a pentagon is 108 degrees - a geometric property embedded in one of the most fundamental forms in sacred geometry. How long has that knowledge existed? Randall argues the accumulated evidence points in only one direction. Advanced civilizations existed in the deep human past - leaving very little record, but enough. Enough that approached from the right perspective the conclusion becomes difficult to avoid. Graham Hancock has been making that argument for decades and Randall notes the evidence is increasingly vindicating it. Human history is deeper and more complex than the mainstream has ever been willing to accommodate. The primary reason it took this long to recognize is the mirror problem - if an ancient civilization does not look like what we have already built, we do not recognize it as civilization at all. We are searching for our own reflection in the ancient record. That search is being overturned by evidence of a historical depth inseparably linked to repeated cycles of catastrophe that have reset the human story more than once.
1:10

The angular relationship between two edges of a pentagon is 108 degrees - a geometric property embedded in one of the most fundamental forms in sacred geometry. How long has that knowledge existed? Randall argues the accumulated evidence points in only one direction. Advanced civilizations existed in the deep human past - leaving very little record, but enough. Enough that approached from the right perspective the conclusion becomes difficult to avoid. Graham Hancock has been making that argument for decades and Randall notes the evidence is increasingly vindicating it. Human history is deeper and more complex than the mainstream has ever been willing to accommodate. The primary reason it took this long to recognize is the mirror problem - if an ancient civilization does not look like what we have already built, we do not recognize it as civilization at all. We are searching for our own reflection in the ancient record. That search is being overturned by evidence of a historical depth inseparably linked to repeated cycles of catastrophe that have reset the human story more than once.

Randall Carlson

12,809 views • 2 months ago

The water erosion visible on the Sphinx is not a minor detail or a contested footnote. It is a geological clock - and Randall reads it directly. The last time significant rainfall occurred in the region of the Giza Plateau was approximately 10,000 years ago. If the erosion pattern on the Sphinx was produced by water rather than wind and sand, as the evidence strongly suggests, then the structure has to be at least that old. Randall states he is 100% on board with that minimum date. The emphasis, however, is on the word minimum. Randall’s position is that the Sphinx is much, much older than 10,000 years - placing it potentially in the same company as the most ancient megalithic remains he has encountered in his exploration, including the extraordinary stonework at Baalbek. The rainfall record gives a floor. The geology, the construction style, and the broader context of what Randall has been finding across multiple ancient sites suggest the ceiling is considerably higher than mainstream archaeology has ever been willing to acknowledge. The Sphinx was not built at the dawn of Egyptian civilization. It may have been ancient even to the ancient Egyptians.
0:38

The water erosion visible on the Sphinx is not a minor detail or a contested footnote. It is a geological clock - and Randall reads it directly. The last time significant rainfall occurred in the region of the Giza Plateau was approximately 10,000 years ago. If the erosion pattern on the Sphinx was produced by water rather than wind and sand, as the evidence strongly suggests, then the structure has to be at least that old. Randall states he is 100% on board with that minimum date. The emphasis, however, is on the word minimum. Randall’s position is that the Sphinx is much, much older than 10,000 years - placing it potentially in the same company as the most ancient megalithic remains he has encountered in his exploration, including the extraordinary stonework at Baalbek. The rainfall record gives a floor. The geology, the construction style, and the broader context of what Randall has been finding across multiple ancient sites suggest the ceiling is considerably higher than mainstream archaeology has ever been willing to acknowledge. The Sphinx was not built at the dawn of Egyptian civilization. It may have been ancient even to the ancient Egyptians.

Randall Carlson

18,513 views • 3 months ago

The fingerprints of an advanced predecessor culture are visible across the ancient world. Randall’s question is not whether they exist - he considers the evidence for that overwhelming - but who left them, and what the nature of their knowledge actually was. The term he reaches for is sacred science - a deliberate fusion of what modern thinking has artificially separated into religion and physics, spirituality and technology. That separation, Randall argues, is a recent invention. It did not exist in the knowledge systems of the cultures that preceded us. The framework Randall builds on is Arthur C. Clarke's observation that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic - and by extension, from the miraculous. A civilization practicing sacred science would have produced phenomena that later cultures could only interpret through a spiritual lens, because the scientific framework needed to recognize it as technology had been lost along with everything else. Randall’s position is that this is precisely what happened - that predecessor cultures were operating within a unified system where science and spirituality were a single discipline, and that the fingerprints they left behind are the residue of that holy science waiting to be correctly read.
0:45

The fingerprints of an advanced predecessor culture are visible across the ancient world. Randall’s question is not whether they exist - he considers the evidence for that overwhelming - but who left them, and what the nature of their knowledge actually was. The term he reaches for is sacred science - a deliberate fusion of what modern thinking has artificially separated into religion and physics, spirituality and technology. That separation, Randall argues, is a recent invention. It did not exist in the knowledge systems of the cultures that preceded us. The framework Randall builds on is Arthur C. Clarke's observation that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic - and by extension, from the miraculous. A civilization practicing sacred science would have produced phenomena that later cultures could only interpret through a spiritual lens, because the scientific framework needed to recognize it as technology had been lost along with everything else. Randall’s position is that this is precisely what happened - that predecessor cultures were operating within a unified system where science and spirituality were a single discipline, and that the fingerprints they left behind are the residue of that holy science waiting to be correctly read.

Randall Carlson

11,737 views • 4 months ago

The assumption that Earth operates as a largely self-contained system - affected by its own geology, its own climate cycles, its own biological processes - is one Randall argues we need to outgrow. This planet is embedded in a cosmic environment, and the evidence that the cosmic domain impinges on the terrestrial far more frequently than previously imagined is now beyond ambiguity. The ancient peoples who were obsessed with the sky were not engaged in superstition. They were paying attention to something that modern science is only now catching up to. The solar constant - the assumed stability of energy output from the sun - is not nearly as constant as the name implies. Randall argues that a significant portion of the changes happening on Earth, changes that are routinely attributed to purely terrestrial causes, are connected to fluctuations and events in the cosmic domain of which Earth is a part. The sky that ancient cultures watched with such intensity was not a backdrop to human history. It was an active participant in it - and Randall argues that thinking cosmically is not an abstract philosophical exercise. It is the only framework large enough to accurately account for what has been happening on this planet throughout human history and what continues to happen now. Spots are limited - click here to join Randall on his upcoming Finger Lakes tour!
0:48

The assumption that Earth operates as a largely self-contained system - affected by its own geology, its own climate cycles, its own biological processes - is one Randall argues we need to outgrow. This planet is embedded in a cosmic environment, and the evidence that the cosmic domain impinges on the terrestrial far more frequently than previously imagined is now beyond ambiguity. The ancient peoples who were obsessed with the sky were not engaged in superstition. They were paying attention to something that modern science is only now catching up to. The solar constant - the assumed stability of energy output from the sun - is not nearly as constant as the name implies. Randall argues that a significant portion of the changes happening on Earth, changes that are routinely attributed to purely terrestrial causes, are connected to fluctuations and events in the cosmic domain of which Earth is a part. The sky that ancient cultures watched with such intensity was not a backdrop to human history. It was an active participant in it - and Randall argues that thinking cosmically is not an abstract philosophical exercise. It is the only framework large enough to accurately account for what has been happening on this planet throughout human history and what continues to happen now. Spots are limited - click here to join Randall on his upcoming Finger Lakes tour!

Randall Carlson

14,458 views • 4 months ago

After Ancient Apocalypse aired, the critical response from mainstream media and academic archaeology was swift and coordinated. Randall went through ten to twelve independent criticisms of the show - from journalists, from archaeologists, from sources presenting themselves as separate and unaffiliated - and found nothing of substance in any of them. What he found instead was something that struck him as far more significant than the criticism itself. The same phraseology. The same arguments. The same framing, repeated across supposedly independent sources with a consistency that pointed not to genuine independent analysis but to a shared origin. Randall is direct about what that pattern implies. Someone assembled that script and distributed it. The coordination required to produce identical talking points across multiple mainstream outlets and academic voices does not happen organically - it requires organization, intent, and a decision made somewhere by someone with both the motivation and the reach to make it happen. Randall names Graham Hancock as a friend and makes clear this is personal as well as principled. The erasure and rewriting of history he has been documenting throughout his research is not an abstract institutional tendency. It has an author - and Randall states plainly that in the interest of disclosure, he would very much like to know who that is.
0:57

After Ancient Apocalypse aired, the critical response from mainstream media and academic archaeology was swift and coordinated. Randall went through ten to twelve independent criticisms of the show - from journalists, from archaeologists, from sources presenting themselves as separate and unaffiliated - and found nothing of substance in any of them. What he found instead was something that struck him as far more significant than the criticism itself. The same phraseology. The same arguments. The same framing, repeated across supposedly independent sources with a consistency that pointed not to genuine independent analysis but to a shared origin. Randall is direct about what that pattern implies. Someone assembled that script and distributed it. The coordination required to produce identical talking points across multiple mainstream outlets and academic voices does not happen organically - it requires organization, intent, and a decision made somewhere by someone with both the motivation and the reach to make it happen. Randall names Graham Hancock as a friend and makes clear this is personal as well as principled. The erasure and rewriting of history he has been documenting throughout his research is not an abstract institutional tendency. It has an author - and Randall states plainly that in the interest of disclosure, he would very much like to know who that is.

Randall Carlson

34,170 views • 4 months ago

One of the most terrifying attacks carried out by Israel, where it completely destroyed the Mashteha Tower within a matter of seconds, as it is considered one of the largest and most beautiful towers in Gaza, and houses thousands of families living in it, despite the thousands of tents that were located on every side of this tower, aircraft launched no less than 6 deadly missiles that resulted in thousands of lethal shrapnel fragments, which led to the destruction of thousands of tents that were the only shelter for the families. This is not just a war, this is genocide.
0:28

One of the most terrifying attacks carried out by Israel, where it completely destroyed the Mashteha Tower within a matter of seconds, as it is considered one of the largest and most beautiful towers in Gaza, and houses thousands of families living in it, despite the thousands of tents that were located on every side of this tower, aircraft launched no less than 6 deadly missiles that resulted in thousands of lethal shrapnel fragments, which led to the destruction of thousands of tents that were the only shelter for the families. This is not just a war, this is genocide.

Haitham in Gaza 🇵🇸🍉

1,352,166 views • 2 months ago

The thought experiment Randall poses is deliberately visceral. Drop an atomic bomb on a city and obliterate it. Then drop another on the same location. Now wait 10,000 years - or 20,000. What remains? What would an archaeologist looking at that site even recognize as artificial? The answer Randall builds toward is the one that undermines one of the most common objections to the existence of advanced ancient civilizations - that we would have found the evidence by now. The geological process Randall describes is precise. The rubble of an obliterated city, given sufficient time, gets reincorporated into the geological stratum - compacted, cemented, and reconstituted into what geologists call conglomerate rock. A jumble of broken material cemented together. Within that conglomerate could be fragments of an advanced civilization that no researcher would recognize as artificial, because nothing in the conventional framework would prompt them to look for it. The absence of recognizable ruins is not proof that nothing was there. It may simply be proof that enough time has passed to make the evidence invisible to eyes that don't know what they are looking for.
0:41

The thought experiment Randall poses is deliberately visceral. Drop an atomic bomb on a city and obliterate it. Then drop another on the same location. Now wait 10,000 years - or 20,000. What remains? What would an archaeologist looking at that site even recognize as artificial? The answer Randall builds toward is the one that undermines one of the most common objections to the existence of advanced ancient civilizations - that we would have found the evidence by now. The geological process Randall describes is precise. The rubble of an obliterated city, given sufficient time, gets reincorporated into the geological stratum - compacted, cemented, and reconstituted into what geologists call conglomerate rock. A jumble of broken material cemented together. Within that conglomerate could be fragments of an advanced civilization that no researcher would recognize as artificial, because nothing in the conventional framework would prompt them to look for it. The absence of recognizable ruins is not proof that nothing was there. It may simply be proof that enough time has passed to make the evidence invisible to eyes that don't know what they are looking for.

Randall Carlson

44,027 views • 4 months ago

"We're one and eight. The reality of the position that we find ourselves in, as Rob's alluded to as well, is that it was time for a change." - Graham Wright, Carlton CEO
0:43

"We're one and eight. The reality of the position that we find ourselves in, as Rob's alluded to as well, is that it was time for a change." - Graham Wright, Carlton CEO

7AFL

20,980 views • 2 months ago

The Eagles are heading back to Buffalo for the first time since 2019, and that stadium will always be tied to one of the most legendary plays in franchise history. It was in 1990 as the ball was on the Eagles’ own 5 yard line. Randall Cunningham is in Hall of Famer Bruce Smith arms in the endzone but instead of taking the safety, he ducks and launches a prayer downfield to Fred Barnett. Barnett goes up, hauls it in, and takes it to the house. That 95 yard touchdown is the second longest play in Eagles history and one of the most iconic moments this team has ever produced.
0:52

The Eagles are heading back to Buffalo for the first time since 2019, and that stadium will always be tied to one of the most legendary plays in franchise history. It was in 1990 as the ball was on the Eagles’ own 5 yard line. Randall Cunningham is in Hall of Famer Bruce Smith arms in the endzone but instead of taking the safety, he ducks and launches a prayer downfield to Fred Barnett. Barnett goes up, hauls it in, and takes it to the house. That 95 yard touchdown is the second longest play in Eagles history and one of the most iconic moments this team has ever produced.

Fly Eagles Fly Bets

85,978 views • 7 months ago

The energy paradox at the heart of glacial termination is more precise than most people realize - and Randall makes the mathematics explicit. The greatest concentrations of thermal energy available on Earth are the subtropical deserts like the Sahara and the tropical oceans. Scientists calculated how long it would take to melt the entire North American ice mass if it could be moved to the most energy-rich environment on the planet - the tropical ocean. The answer was three times longer than the ice actually took to disappear. That is not a minor discrepancy. The ice melted three times faster than the maximum thermal energy available from any known terrestrial source could account for. The problem was significant enough that a dedicated scientific conference was convened in 1973 to address it - the energy paradox. A follow-up conference in 1975 attempted to resolve what the first had identified. Neither succeeded. Randall states that plainly - the energy paradox has not been resolved. The question of where the thermal energy came from to melt that volume of ice that quickly remains open - and Randall’s research has consistently pointed toward the only two explanations that could plausibly account for it. A cosmic impact. Or the sun. RANDALL AT QUEST FOR ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS Get your exclusive ticket in the Randall Carlson dedicated seating section at Quest for Ancient Civilizations in Sedona, May 1-3, 2026:
0:55

The energy paradox at the heart of glacial termination is more precise than most people realize - and Randall makes the mathematics explicit. The greatest concentrations of thermal energy available on Earth are the subtropical deserts like the Sahara and the tropical oceans. Scientists calculated how long it would take to melt the entire North American ice mass if it could be moved to the most energy-rich environment on the planet - the tropical ocean. The answer was three times longer than the ice actually took to disappear. That is not a minor discrepancy. The ice melted three times faster than the maximum thermal energy available from any known terrestrial source could account for. The problem was significant enough that a dedicated scientific conference was convened in 1973 to address it - the energy paradox. A follow-up conference in 1975 attempted to resolve what the first had identified. Neither succeeded. Randall states that plainly - the energy paradox has not been resolved. The question of where the thermal energy came from to melt that volume of ice that quickly remains open - and Randall’s research has consistently pointed toward the only two explanations that could plausibly account for it. A cosmic impact. Or the sun. RANDALL AT QUEST FOR ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS Get your exclusive ticket in the Randall Carlson dedicated seating section at Quest for Ancient Civilizations in Sedona, May 1-3, 2026:

Randall Carlson

12,019 views • 3 months ago

Randall puts a number on something most people have never considered as a repeating pattern. Within the Holocene alone - the last 11,700 years of human history - Randall estimates that civilisation-level collapse has occurred somewhere between half a dozen and ten times. The Bronze Age collapse is one of the most studied examples, but its cause remains contested. The answer may not be singular. Randall points to the possibility of a perfect storm scenario - one in which volcanic and extraterrestrial events occur simultaneously, compounding each other's effects into something no civilisation could absorb. Either alone might be survivable. Both together may not be. What makes this more than speculation is emerging evidence that the relationship between cosmic and terrestrial events may run deeper than simple coincidence. Airburst events and impacts generate enormous mass transfers across the Earth's surface. Randall argues there is now evidence suggesting these oxygenic events - the sudden energetic interactions with the upper atmosphere and surface - may actually function as triggers for terrestrial responses including volcanism and seismic activity. If that relationship is real, then the perfect storm is not just a coincidence of timing. It may be a causal chain.
0:33

Randall puts a number on something most people have never considered as a repeating pattern. Within the Holocene alone - the last 11,700 years of human history - Randall estimates that civilisation-level collapse has occurred somewhere between half a dozen and ten times. The Bronze Age collapse is one of the most studied examples, but its cause remains contested. The answer may not be singular. Randall points to the possibility of a perfect storm scenario - one in which volcanic and extraterrestrial events occur simultaneously, compounding each other's effects into something no civilisation could absorb. Either alone might be survivable. Both together may not be. What makes this more than speculation is emerging evidence that the relationship between cosmic and terrestrial events may run deeper than simple coincidence. Airburst events and impacts generate enormous mass transfers across the Earth's surface. Randall argues there is now evidence suggesting these oxygenic events - the sudden energetic interactions with the upper atmosphere and surface - may actually function as triggers for terrestrial responses including volcanism and seismic activity. If that relationship is real, then the perfect storm is not just a coincidence of timing. It may be a causal chain.

Randall Carlson

23,699 views • 3 months ago

The explanation that the pyramids were built by lifting stones weighing hundreds of thousands of pounds with sticks has, Shawn Ryan suggests, run its course. Few people with any serious engagement with the evidence are still buying it - and yet it persists in educational systems as though the question were settled. Shawn finds that persistence almost more puzzling than the construction mystery itself. The scale of the problem becomes clear when you stop treating each site as an isolated anomaly. Randall draws on his own experience moving heavy weights in construction - noting that even a single ton beam requires cranes and front end loaders today - and applies that practical knowledge directly to the ancient record. The ancient world was moving stones of 100, 200 tons and beyond, not once at a single location but repeatedly, across every inhabited continent, in cultures with no documented contact with one another. Stonehenge, Easter Island, Machu Picchu, and the pyramids are not separate puzzles with separate solutions. They are the same question asked in different languages - and the answer, Randall argues, is one that the stick and ramp theory was never equipped to provide.
1:04

The explanation that the pyramids were built by lifting stones weighing hundreds of thousands of pounds with sticks has, Shawn Ryan suggests, run its course. Few people with any serious engagement with the evidence are still buying it - and yet it persists in educational systems as though the question were settled. Shawn finds that persistence almost more puzzling than the construction mystery itself. The scale of the problem becomes clear when you stop treating each site as an isolated anomaly. Randall draws on his own experience moving heavy weights in construction - noting that even a single ton beam requires cranes and front end loaders today - and applies that practical knowledge directly to the ancient record. The ancient world was moving stones of 100, 200 tons and beyond, not once at a single location but repeatedly, across every inhabited continent, in cultures with no documented contact with one another. Stonehenge, Easter Island, Machu Picchu, and the pyramids are not separate puzzles with separate solutions. They are the same question asked in different languages - and the answer, Randall argues, is one that the stick and ramp theory was never equipped to provide.

Randall Carlson

41,347 views • 4 months ago

The latest skeletal evidence places anatomically modern humans on Earth somewhere between 180,000 and 200,000 years ago. That is approximately 7,000 generations of people biologically identical to us - with the same brains, the same cognitive capacity, and presumably the same drive to organise, build, and innovate. And yet, by the conventional account, civilisation only appeared in the last few hundred generations. The question Randall Carlson raises is not rhetorical. It is one of the most uncomfortable in all of science. How is it that across all those long generations, nothing we would recognise as civilisation took root and flourished? The most parsimonious answer, Randall argues, may not be that civilisation simply hadn't started yet. It may be that it had - and that what we are living in now is not the origin of human civilisation, but its reboot.
0:52

The latest skeletal evidence places anatomically modern humans on Earth somewhere between 180,000 and 200,000 years ago. That is approximately 7,000 generations of people biologically identical to us - with the same brains, the same cognitive capacity, and presumably the same drive to organise, build, and innovate. And yet, by the conventional account, civilisation only appeared in the last few hundred generations. The question Randall Carlson raises is not rhetorical. It is one of the most uncomfortable in all of science. How is it that across all those long generations, nothing we would recognise as civilisation took root and flourished? The most parsimonious answer, Randall argues, may not be that civilisation simply hadn't started yet. It may be that it had - and that what we are living in now is not the origin of human civilisation, but its reboot.

Randall Carlson

582,303 views • 5 months ago

Reports in several Turkish outlets (parroted by Kurdish media) claimed a lavish wedding between a Barzani woman and a man from the Izol, a prominent Kurdish tribe in Turkey’s Urfa. The problem? the woman is actually not a Barzani. The story appears to have spread mainly because of the wedding’s extravagance and the heavy gold showered on the bride, much of it seemingly from her family. But the bride’s father, reported as “Abdulkarim Barzani,” is not from the Barzani tribe — the surname is misleading. He is Masoud Barzani’s secretary, known in Kurdistan as Karim Juma’a, and he is from the Gargari tribe, a separate Kurdish tribe that has presence mostly in Nineveh but also Duhok. Still, the scale of the gold and diamonds coming from her side does raise questions, given that her father is publicly known only as Barzani’s secretary. The Izol, for their part, are a large Urfa-based Kurdish tribe that is generally state-friendly and mostly aligned with the AKP and MHP.
1:14

Reports in several Turkish outlets (parroted by Kurdish media) claimed a lavish wedding between a Barzani woman and a man from the Izol, a prominent Kurdish tribe in Turkey’s Urfa. The problem? the woman is actually not a Barzani. The story appears to have spread mainly because of the wedding’s extravagance and the heavy gold showered on the bride, much of it seemingly from her family. But the bride’s father, reported as “Abdulkarim Barzani,” is not from the Barzani tribe — the surname is misleading. He is Masoud Barzani’s secretary, known in Kurdistan as Karim Juma’a, and he is from the Gargari tribe, a separate Kurdish tribe that has presence mostly in Nineveh but also Duhok. Still, the scale of the gold and diamonds coming from her side does raise questions, given that her father is publicly known only as Barzani’s secretary. The Izol, for their part, are a large Urfa-based Kurdish tribe that is generally state-friendly and mostly aligned with the AKP and MHP.

Kurdistan Watch

36,366 views • 7 months ago

Plato placed the destruction of Atlantis 9,000 years before Solon's journey to Egypt. Solon made that journey around 600 BC, approximately 2,600 years ago. The arithmetic is straightforward - 11,600 years before the present. That is the date Plato gave for a civilisation sinking beneath the waves during a catastrophic event. It is also, within the margin of current dating precision, the period known as Meltwater Pulse 1B - one of the most dramatic episodes of rapid sea level rise in the geological record, during which coastlines around the world were being swallowed at a rate that would have been visible within a human lifetime. Randall Carlson's point is not that this proves Atlantis existed. It is that Plato's date correlates precisely with a real, well-documented geological event characterised by exactly the kind of destruction he described. However, when historians and archaeologists notice this at all, it is filed under coincidence and set aside. At some point, Randall suggests, the convergence of independent lines of evidence deserves a more serious response than that.
0:43

Plato placed the destruction of Atlantis 9,000 years before Solon's journey to Egypt. Solon made that journey around 600 BC, approximately 2,600 years ago. The arithmetic is straightforward - 11,600 years before the present. That is the date Plato gave for a civilisation sinking beneath the waves during a catastrophic event. It is also, within the margin of current dating precision, the period known as Meltwater Pulse 1B - one of the most dramatic episodes of rapid sea level rise in the geological record, during which coastlines around the world were being swallowed at a rate that would have been visible within a human lifetime. Randall Carlson's point is not that this proves Atlantis existed. It is that Plato's date correlates precisely with a real, well-documented geological event characterised by exactly the kind of destruction he described. However, when historians and archaeologists notice this at all, it is filed under coincidence and set aside. At some point, Randall suggests, the convergence of independent lines of evidence deserves a more serious response than that.

Randall Carlson

58,057 views • 5 months ago

The man who invented modern fantasy didn't publish his first novel until he was forty-five. By that age, J.R.R. Tolkien had already built a respectable life. He was an Oxford professor, an expert in ancient languages, with a wife and four children and a settled academic career. He was exactly the kind of man who might reasonably have decided that the shape of his life was already fixed. The work he would be remembered for, he had not yet even begun... The story, which Tolkien told himself, is that one summer he was grading examination papers, when he turned a page and found that a student had left it blank. Without quite knowing why, he wrote a single sentence on it: "In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit." He did not know what a hobbit was. He had spent years inventing languages and mythologies as a private passion, and telling stories to his own children, never imagining any of it would reach the world. But that one line began to grow. It became a story, and then a book, and in 1937, at the age of forty-five, Tolkien published The Hobbit. It was a success, and his publisher asked for a sequel. Tolkien warned them it might take some time. It took 17 years... He wrote it in the margins of a demanding full-time job, revising endlessly, doubting it often. When The Lord of the Rings was finally published, in 1954 and 1955, he was in his early sixties. That book, begun as a middle-aged professor's private side project, went on to sell well over a hundred million copies, to invent modern fantasy as we know it, and to reshape the imagination of the entire world. Tolkien already had a full and respectable life behind him. And still, the thing he is remembered for, the thing that outlived him and reached hundreds of millions of people, was something he began at forty-five, at an age when it would have been the easiest thing in the world to tell himself he had already missed his chance. He didn't. It's never as late as it feels.
3:01

The man who invented modern fantasy didn't publish his first novel until he was forty-five. By that age, J.R.R. Tolkien had already built a respectable life. He was an Oxford professor, an expert in ancient languages, with a wife and four children and a settled academic career. He was exactly the kind of man who might reasonably have decided that the shape of his life was already fixed. The work he would be remembered for, he had not yet even begun... The story, which Tolkien told himself, is that one summer he was grading examination papers, when he turned a page and found that a student had left it blank. Without quite knowing why, he wrote a single sentence on it: "In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit." He did not know what a hobbit was. He had spent years inventing languages and mythologies as a private passion, and telling stories to his own children, never imagining any of it would reach the world. But that one line began to grow. It became a story, and then a book, and in 1937, at the age of forty-five, Tolkien published The Hobbit. It was a success, and his publisher asked for a sequel. Tolkien warned them it might take some time. It took 17 years... He wrote it in the margins of a demanding full-time job, revising endlessly, doubting it often. When The Lord of the Rings was finally published, in 1954 and 1955, he was in his early sixties. That book, begun as a middle-aged professor's private side project, went on to sell well over a hundred million copies, to invent modern fantasy as we know it, and to reshape the imagination of the entire world. Tolkien already had a full and respectable life behind him. And still, the thing he is remembered for, the thing that outlived him and reached hundreds of millions of people, was something he began at forty-five, at an age when it would have been the easiest thing in the world to tell himself he had already missed his chance. He didn't. It's never as late as it feels.

James Lucas

93,424 views • 1 month ago

In 1997 the greatest chess player who ever lived sat down against a machine, lost, and immediately accused it of cheating. IBM's answer was to switch the machine off, take it apart, and refuse to ever play him again. The match was carried on live television. IBM's market value jumped by billions in a single week. The man who lost spent years asking one question the company would never answer. His name is Garry Kasparov. The machine was Deep Blue. The footage is on YouTube. Kasparov was not just a champion. He had been the world's number one for more than fifteen years and is still argued to be the strongest player in history. In 1996 he had beaten IBM's Deep Blue with ease. IBM took it away, rebuilt it, and challenged him again in 1997 in New York, with the whole world watching. Then, in game two, the machine did something that broke him. In a position where every computer of that era would have greedily grabbed a pawn, Deep Blue quietly declined and played a slow, patient, deeply human move instead. Kasparov could not accept that a machine had chosen it. He became convinced a human grandmaster was hidden somewhere, feeding it moves. Rattled, he resigned a game that analysts later proved he could have drawn. He never recovered in the match. Deep Blue won, three and a half to two and a half. It was the first time a reigning world champion had ever lost a match to a computer. The papers called it the day the machines arrived. Kasparov demanded to see the machine's logs, the record of why it played what it played. IBM refused to release them, turned down the rematch he begged for, and quietly dismantled Deep Blue. Years later one of its own engineers admitted that an early move which had unnerved Kasparov may have come from nothing more than a bug, a meaningless fallback the champion had mistaken for genius. Nobody could ever fully settle it. The logs stayed private. This is not really a story about chess. It is about the exact moment human intuition stopped being the ceiling. For centuries the best move in any hard game was whatever the finest human mind could see. In one match a machine found a move a human could not even believe was real, and the greatest mind in the game turned his own genius into paranoia against it. Kasparov spent years bitter about it. Then he said the line that outlived the grudge: "I could feel, I could smell, a new kind of intelligence across the table." He stopped fighting the machine and started studying how humans and machines win together. That, not the loss, was the real lesson. The edge moved that day and it never moved back. It used to be intuition. It became computation. The people who win from here are not the ones with the best gut. They are the ones who stopped trusting their gut the moment the machine could out-see it. The film is free. The logs never came out. Most people will only remember that the human lost.
1:19:41

In 1997 the greatest chess player who ever lived sat down against a machine, lost, and immediately accused it of cheating. IBM's answer was to switch the machine off, take it apart, and refuse to ever play him again. The match was carried on live television. IBM's market value jumped by billions in a single week. The man who lost spent years asking one question the company would never answer. His name is Garry Kasparov. The machine was Deep Blue. The footage is on YouTube. Kasparov was not just a champion. He had been the world's number one for more than fifteen years and is still argued to be the strongest player in history. In 1996 he had beaten IBM's Deep Blue with ease. IBM took it away, rebuilt it, and challenged him again in 1997 in New York, with the whole world watching. Then, in game two, the machine did something that broke him. In a position where every computer of that era would have greedily grabbed a pawn, Deep Blue quietly declined and played a slow, patient, deeply human move instead. Kasparov could not accept that a machine had chosen it. He became convinced a human grandmaster was hidden somewhere, feeding it moves. Rattled, he resigned a game that analysts later proved he could have drawn. He never recovered in the match. Deep Blue won, three and a half to two and a half. It was the first time a reigning world champion had ever lost a match to a computer. The papers called it the day the machines arrived. Kasparov demanded to see the machine's logs, the record of why it played what it played. IBM refused to release them, turned down the rematch he begged for, and quietly dismantled Deep Blue. Years later one of its own engineers admitted that an early move which had unnerved Kasparov may have come from nothing more than a bug, a meaningless fallback the champion had mistaken for genius. Nobody could ever fully settle it. The logs stayed private. This is not really a story about chess. It is about the exact moment human intuition stopped being the ceiling. For centuries the best move in any hard game was whatever the finest human mind could see. In one match a machine found a move a human could not even believe was real, and the greatest mind in the game turned his own genius into paranoia against it. Kasparov spent years bitter about it. Then he said the line that outlived the grudge: "I could feel, I could smell, a new kind of intelligence across the table." He stopped fighting the machine and started studying how humans and machines win together. That, not the loss, was the real lesson. The edge moved that day and it never moved back. It used to be intuition. It became computation. The people who win from here are not the ones with the best gut. They are the ones who stopped trusting their gut the moment the machine could out-see it. The film is free. The logs never came out. Most people will only remember that the human lost.

Voltex

407,140 views • 17 days ago

If being a slimeball had a face, it would be Rajdeep Sardesai. He writes a long post glorifying one of the prominent faces of the protest in the name of students, yet conveniently omits a detail that readers deserve to know: the individual is an AAP office bearer from Rajasthan and has been associated with them as a spokesperson for years. That omission is not a minor oversight, it changes the entire picture. CJP is nothing but “AAP 2.0.” At 61, after decades in the profession, one would expect Rajdeep Sardesai to place the whole truth before his readers, not just the parts that suit his politics.
0:29

If being a slimeball had a face, it would be Rajdeep Sardesai. He writes a long post glorifying one of the prominent faces of the protest in the name of students, yet conveniently omits a detail that readers deserve to know: the individual is an AAP office bearer from Rajasthan and has been associated with them as a spokesperson for years. That omission is not a minor oversight, it changes the entire picture. CJP is nothing but “AAP 2.0.” At 61, after decades in the profession, one would expect Rajdeep Sardesai to place the whole truth before his readers, not just the parts that suit his politics.

Amit Malviya

311,554 views • 12 days ago