Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🤖 #AI automated schematic design — what takes a skilled engineer half a day, it finishes in just one hour ⚡. It’s not just software engineers being replaced, #hardware engineers are next 🔧. The AI era is hitting hard, and it’s terrifying. Can we even survive this? 🤔💭

Sipeed

26,769 subscribers

17,836 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie #AI #hardware

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

i took a trip to the PlanetScale office last week to chat with Sam Lambert about a couple of under-discussed topics: - AI (heard it's a big deal) - Anxiety - Are software engineers screwed? i have a feeling this MOTS extra will calm a lot of people down 01:07 - Databases and reliability in the AI era 05:20 - Crashing out online 07:00 - AI’s contribution to software slop 09:25 - Custom software 11:03 - Software engineer midwit curve 14:52 - Is AI making engineers dumber? 17:30 - AI is just another abstraction 18:28 - Sam’s advice to engineers feeling anxious 21:40 - Hiring bloat and ZIRP hangover 23:58 - You want more of the right engineers using AI

i took a trip to the PlanetScale office last week to chat with Sam Lambert about a couple of under-discussed topics: - AI (heard it's a big deal) - Anxiety - Are software engineers screwed? i have a feeling this MOTS extra will calm a lot of people down 01:07 - Databases and reliability in the AI era 05:20 - Crashing out online 07:00 - AI’s contribution to software slop 09:25 - Custom software 11:03 - Software engineer midwit curve 14:52 - Is AI making engineers dumber? 17:30 - AI is just another abstraction 18:28 - Sam’s advice to engineers feeling anxious 21:40 - Hiring bloat and ZIRP hangover 23:58 - You want more of the right engineers using AI

atlas

27,964 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

I just raised $5M to build AI beyond the chatbox Cal AI was completely bootstrapped and did $50M in the first 18 months. This time, we're using capital to scale even faster and hire world-class talent from day one. We are looking for: -AI founding engineers -Design engineers -Growth marketers 1-10% equity + competitive base. Apply below.

I just raised $5M to build AI beyond the chatbox Cal AI was completely bootstrapped and did $50M in the first 18 months. This time, we're using capital to scale even faster and hire world-class talent from day one. We are looking for: -AI founding engineers -Design engineers -Growth marketers 1-10% equity + competitive base. Apply below.

Zach Yadegari

433,508 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

Replit CEO Amjad Masad: "Code is almost fully automated." "We have an automated software engineer that is as good as a mid-level software engineer. It would get a job at Facebook or Google." "Even professional software engineers are not coding anymore." "If you're a product builder, all you have to care about is who the customer is." "What do you understand about the world that other people don't? And can you put that into an app?" Amjad Masad with

Replit CEO Amjad Masad: "Code is almost fully automated." "We have an automated software engineer that is as good as a mid-level software engineer. It would get a job at Facebook or Google." "Even professional software engineers are not coding anymore." "If you're a product builder, all you have to care about is who the customer is." "What do you understand about the world that other people don't? And can you put that into an app?" Amjad Masad with

a16z

90,480 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Jensen Huang recently said he wants his engineers to spend 0% of their time coding. At first, it sounds absurd — until you realize what he really means. Coding is becoming automated. The new value isn’t in typing instructions for machines… …it’s in teaching machines what’s worth building. Jensen’s message is clear: The future belongs to engineers who understand systems, context, and creativity — not just syntax. As AI takes over execution, human intelligence must rise to orchestration. It’s not about writing code anymore. It’s about writing the future. What do you think — will the best engineers of 2026 still code, or will they design intelligence itself? #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #Coding #Technology #FutureOfWork #Leadership #Innovation #Automation #MachineLearning #AIandHumanity

Jensen Huang recently said he wants his engineers to spend 0% of their time coding. At first, it sounds absurd — until you realize what he really means. Coding is becoming automated. The new value isn’t in typing instructions for machines… …it’s in teaching machines what’s worth building. Jensen’s message is clear: The future belongs to engineers who understand systems, context, and creativity — not just syntax. As AI takes over execution, human intelligence must rise to orchestration. It’s not about writing code anymore. It’s about writing the future. What do you think — will the best engineers of 2026 still code, or will they design intelligence itself? #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #Coding #Technology #FutureOfWork #Leadership #Innovation #Automation #MachineLearning #AIandHumanity

Pascal Bornet

65,503 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang just called the idea of AI replacing software engineers "complete nonsense" "The number of software engineers is actually increasing... if you can hire a software engineer and generate $9 trillion worth of productive work, why wouldn't you want to hire more? If that line were flat, then obviously people would hire fewer software engineers. But because the output is so incredible, people want to hire more This is going to show up in our economy somehow, soon. Useful AI has arrived"

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang just called the idea of AI replacing software engineers "complete nonsense" "The number of software engineers is actually increasing... if you can hire a software engineer and generate $9 trillion worth of productive work, why wouldn't you want to hire more? If that line were flat, then obviously people would hire fewer software engineers. But because the output is so incredible, people want to hire more This is going to show up in our economy somehow, soon. Useful AI has arrived"

X Freeze

109,188 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Jensen Huang just explained why every company cutting engineers over AI is asking the entirely wrong question. Huang: “People say, I don’t need software engineers because apparently coding is going to be automated.” That was the narrative. Here is what Huang actually did. Huang: “I’ve given AIs to every one of my software engineers and hardware engineers and engineers period. 100% of NVIDIA has AI assistants, AI coders, and they’re busier than ever.” Not fewer engineers. Not smaller teams. Busier than ever. That is the line most companies are getting completely wrong right now. They hear “AI can write code” and immediately start cutting headcount. Huang did the opposite. He armed everyone. Huang: “And so the question is, what is the task versus what is the job? No different than a financial analyst; the task is mess around with spreadsheets, but the job is to make financial advice. The job is to help a customer.” Writing code was always the task. It was never the job. The job is architecture. Knowing what to build. Why it matters. How it fits into a system that actually creates value. Code is the execution layer between the idea and the outcome. Nothing more. When you automate that layer, you don’t eliminate the engineer. You eliminate the bottleneck between what they can envision and what they can ship. The companies using AI to cut headcount are optimizing for cost. The companies using AI to multiply output are optimizing for territory. Nvidia chose territory. Every engineer at the most valuable semiconductor company on Earth now operates with an AI assistant. Not a pilot program. Not an experiment. Company-wide. Every function. Every team. And the result is not less work. It is more work. Faster. At a scale that was physically impossible twelve months ago. The companies that understand the difference between eliminating engineers and unleashing them will build what comes next. The ones that don’t will watch their best talent walk out the door to the ones that did.

Jensen Huang just explained why every company cutting engineers over AI is asking the entirely wrong question. Huang: “People say, I don’t need software engineers because apparently coding is going to be automated.” That was the narrative. Here is what Huang actually did. Huang: “I’ve given AIs to every one of my software engineers and hardware engineers and engineers period. 100% of NVIDIA has AI assistants, AI coders, and they’re busier than ever.” Not fewer engineers. Not smaller teams. Busier than ever. That is the line most companies are getting completely wrong right now. They hear “AI can write code” and immediately start cutting headcount. Huang did the opposite. He armed everyone. Huang: “And so the question is, what is the task versus what is the job? No different than a financial analyst; the task is mess around with spreadsheets, but the job is to make financial advice. The job is to help a customer.” Writing code was always the task. It was never the job. The job is architecture. Knowing what to build. Why it matters. How it fits into a system that actually creates value. Code is the execution layer between the idea and the outcome. Nothing more. When you automate that layer, you don’t eliminate the engineer. You eliminate the bottleneck between what they can envision and what they can ship. The companies using AI to cut headcount are optimizing for cost. The companies using AI to multiply output are optimizing for territory. Nvidia chose territory. Every engineer at the most valuable semiconductor company on Earth now operates with an AI assistant. Not a pilot program. Not an experiment. Company-wide. Every function. Every team. And the result is not less work. It is more work. Faster. At a scale that was physically impossible twelve months ago. The companies that understand the difference between eliminating engineers and unleashing them will build what comes next. The ones that don’t will watch their best talent walk out the door to the ones that did.

Dustin

82,810 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Palantir CEO Alex Karp and Jensen Huang: AI = American Intelligence 🇺🇸 “AI makes America the dominant country in the world.” “I spent half my life in Europe—they’re whining and crying. We have the right chips, software, engineers, culture…” “It’s combining into a juggernaut.”

Palantir CEO Alex Karp and Jensen Huang: AI = American Intelligence 🇺🇸 “AI makes America the dominant country in the world.” “I spent half my life in Europe—they’re whining and crying. We have the right chips, software, engineers, culture…” “It’s combining into a juggernaut.”

Jawwwn

645,565 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Some personal hot takes from AI: engineer Miami follows... 1. Software development is a dead-end profession because anyone can be a software developer now. 2. Anyone can use Cursor or any other tool and generate code. Being a coder and being a software engineer are different. 3. Computers used to be gated; now everyone has the power to make computers malleable. Everyone is a software developer now, but that does not mean they are software engineers 4. If you cannot demonstrate how a coding agent works, you are just a consumer and have imposed an artificial glass ceiling on your career as a software engineer. 5. If you are curious, you will have a job. If you have not been curious in the last two years, you are replaceable. 6. SaaS per-seat economics may become unstable as customers need fewer people to achieve results, prompting founders to think about new unit economics 7. Most companies will take two or three years (or more!) to figure out AI transformation. 8. Some companies are already building AI native teams of five to ten people who can build with the grain of AI 9. There will be an explosion in the number of software developers. Software development is now essentially free, and tokens are cheaper than humans 10. Not enough engineers know what it means to be a product engineer 11. JIRA ticket monkeys are cooked 12. If your company has banned AI, you should quit that company 13. AI is more like a musical instrument than just a tool play with it, make discoveries, build intuition learn where AI is good and where it fails

Some personal hot takes from AI: engineer Miami follows... 1. Software development is a dead-end profession because anyone can be a software developer now. 2. Anyone can use Cursor or any other tool and generate code. Being a coder and being a software engineer are different. 3. Computers used to be gated; now everyone has the power to make computers malleable. Everyone is a software developer now, but that does not mean they are software engineers 4. If you cannot demonstrate how a coding agent works, you are just a consumer and have imposed an artificial glass ceiling on your career as a software engineer. 5. If you are curious, you will have a job. If you have not been curious in the last two years, you are replaceable. 6. SaaS per-seat economics may become unstable as customers need fewer people to achieve results, prompting founders to think about new unit economics 7. Most companies will take two or three years (or more!) to figure out AI transformation. 8. Some companies are already building AI native teams of five to ten people who can build with the grain of AI 9. There will be an explosion in the number of software developers. Software development is now essentially free, and tokens are cheaper than humans 10. Not enough engineers know what it means to be a product engineer 11. JIRA ticket monkeys are cooked 12. If your company has banned AI, you should quit that company 13. AI is more like a musical instrument than just a tool play with it, make discoveries, build intuition learn where AI is good and where it fails

geoff

72,261 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Even if AI will write 90% of code. But it won’t replace engineers. Windsurf’s founder explains that even if AI generates most of the code, engineers still spend time reviewing it, debugging issues, designing systems, testing, deploying, and making architectural decisions. Those parts don’t disappear. He brings up Amdahl’s Law to make the point: speeding up one part of the workflow doesn’t dramatically change the total time unless everything else speeds up too. For example, if writing code takes 30 out of 100 total time units, and AI brings it down to 3, the total time still only drops to 73. That’s just a 27% improvement. More productivity doesn’t mean fewer engineers. It just increases the ROI of building tech. And when ROI goes up, companies are more likely to build—and hire more people to do it. Take JPMorgan Chase. They have 50,000+ engineers and a $17B software budget. If each engineer can ship more software, that doesn’t reduce headcount. It raises the cost of not building. Companies like Windsurf and Anthropic are hiring more engineers—not less—despite being at the edge of AI code generation.

Even if AI will write 90% of code. But it won’t replace engineers. Windsurf’s founder explains that even if AI generates most of the code, engineers still spend time reviewing it, debugging issues, designing systems, testing, deploying, and making architectural decisions. Those parts don’t disappear. He brings up Amdahl’s Law to make the point: speeding up one part of the workflow doesn’t dramatically change the total time unless everything else speeds up too. For example, if writing code takes 30 out of 100 total time units, and AI brings it down to 3, the total time still only drops to 73. That’s just a 27% improvement. More productivity doesn’t mean fewer engineers. It just increases the ROI of building tech. And when ROI goes up, companies are more likely to build—and hire more people to do it. Take JPMorgan Chase. They have 50,000+ engineers and a $17B software budget. If each engineer can ship more software, that doesn’t reduce headcount. It raises the cost of not building. Companies like Windsurf and Anthropic are hiring more engineers—not less—despite being at the edge of AI code generation.

Aish

27,268 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

$Broadcom's CEO just told investors that one senior engineer with Claude Opus can do in one week what ten engineers earning $300,000 a year take three months to produce. Every engineering org in the world is running the wrong headcount math. This was not a prediction. It was a report from inside Broadcom. Hock Tan said his engineers are already using Claude Opus for engineering design and code assistance. Not experimenting with it. Using it. And the output they are getting from a single senior engineer in one week is equivalent to what a team of ten would produce over three months. Do that math slowly. Ten engineers at $300,000 a year is $3 million in annual salary. Three months of their time is $750,000 of labor. One engineer with Claude Opus produces the same result in one week. He also said something that most people in the room let slide past them. The engineers who get good at these tools do not just get faster. They get better. The designs they produce with AI assistance are probably better than what they would produce without it. That is the part nobody wants to say out loud. It was never just about speed. The ceiling on what a single engineer can produce just moved. And the teams that have not figured that out yet are spending $750,000 to do what one person with the right tools can do for a fraction of that. What do you guys think about this? (Watch the full interview at Bloomberg Live on YouTube)$

Broadcom's CEO just told investors that one senior engineer with Claude Opus can do in one week what ten engineers earning $300,000 a year take three months to produce. Every engineering org in the world is running the wrong headcount math. This was not a prediction. It was a report from inside Broadcom. Hock Tan said his engineers are already using Claude Opus for engineering design and code assistance. Not experimenting with it. Using it. And the output they are getting from a single senior engineer in one week is equivalent to what a team of ten would produce over three months. Do that math slowly. Ten engineers at $300,000 a year is $3 million in annual salary. Three months of their time is $750,000 of labor. One engineer with Claude Opus produces the same result in one week. He also said something that most people in the room let slide past them. The engineers who get good at these tools do not just get faster. They get better. The designs they produce with AI assistance are probably better than what they would produce without it. That is the part nobody wants to say out loud. It was never just about speed. The ceiling on what a single engineer can produce just moved. And the teams that have not figured that out yet are spending $750,000 to do what one person with the right tools can do for a fraction of that. What do you guys think about this? (Watch the full interview at Bloomberg Live on YouTube)

Ihtesham Ali

97,288 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

AI designs functional hardware! 🔧 Claude Opus 4.7 is leading CAD benchmarks, and AI is starting to design functional hardware autonomously. The shift happening: CAD as a tool → CAD as an autonomous system. The model didn't just sketch geometry, it generated mechanically valid designs with joints and motion constraints. It optimized for real-world functionality, not just visual correctness like earlier LLMs. This mirrors what happened in coding last year. In software, engineers moved toward requirements, architecture, and orchestration while code became the compiled outcome of AI systems. Mechanical engineering may follow the same path: from designing parts → defining intent. This changes the role of engineering teams. Instead of manually designing every component, engineers will define constraints, validate outputs, and focus on system-level architecture. Engineers spend less time on geometry and more time on optimization and integration. AI handles the mechanical validity checks that traditionally required experienced designers. ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →

AI designs functional hardware! 🔧 Claude Opus 4.7 is leading CAD benchmarks, and AI is starting to design functional hardware autonomously. The shift happening: CAD as a tool → CAD as an autonomous system. The model didn't just sketch geometry, it generated mechanically valid designs with joints and motion constraints. It optimized for real-world functionality, not just visual correctness like earlier LLMs. This mirrors what happened in coding last year. In software, engineers moved toward requirements, architecture, and orchestration while code became the compiled outcome of AI systems. Mechanical engineering may follow the same path: from designing parts → defining intent. This changes the role of engineering teams. Instead of manually designing every component, engineers will define constraints, validate outputs, and focus on system-level architecture. Engineers spend less time on geometry and more time on optimization and integration. AI handles the mechanical validity checks that traditionally required experienced designers. ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →

Lukas Ziegler

25,458 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Got nerd sniped by this discussion. Ended up collecting all the design engineers I follow and respect into a list. Trying to figure out what we think a design engineer is by example. Link in the next tweet 👇

Got nerd sniped by this discussion. Ended up collecting all the design engineers I follow and respect into a list. Trying to figure out what we think a design engineer is by example. Link in the next tweet 👇

Maggie Appleton

102,259 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

"The one thing that's going to be truly future proof is judgment. What is the biggest challenge when you have a thousand AI engineers writing code? AI slop. In an era when you can do everything, the question is which of these things matter. On the engineer side, it is evaluating the code. Which of this code is even valuable? You can have AI engineers writing beautiful code that could be wrong, that could have bugs in it, that could be vulnerable. Someone needs to review it. Make sure to have a human review at some point, especially critical code that is in the core of your system. On the product side is judgment around what needs to be built and evaluating. And similarly in design, you have to have judgment around, does it make sense in the broader design system. I think this judgment is the number one thing that humans are going to bring in an era of infinite productivity."

"The one thing that's going to be truly future proof is judgment. What is the biggest challenge when you have a thousand AI engineers writing code? AI slop. In an era when you can do everything, the question is which of these things matter. On the engineer side, it is evaluating the code. Which of this code is even valuable? You can have AI engineers writing beautiful code that could be wrong, that could have bugs in it, that could be vulnerable. Someone needs to review it. Make sure to have a human review at some point, especially critical code that is in the core of your system. On the product side is judgment around what needs to be built and evaluating. And similarly in design, you have to have judgment around, does it make sense in the broader design system. I think this judgment is the number one thing that humans are going to bring in an era of infinite productivity."

Patrick OShaughnessy

24,818 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

AI IS ABOUT TO RESET THE WORLD’S INDUSTRIES 🤯 NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang says we’re entering the largest industrial buildout in human history driven by AI. Entire sectors are being rebuilt around AI infrastructure: 🤖 AI factories and chip plants 🤖 Robotics across $50T manufacturing 🤖 AI-powered telecom networks 🤖 Agentic retail and customer service 🤖 Real-time AI in media, gaming, and live video 🤖 Quantum + GPU hybrid systems Even telecom towers -- the backbone of the internet -- could soon become AI compute platforms at the edge. The message from NVIDIA’s GTC stage was clear: The next wave of AI isn’t just software -- it’s a global infrastructure buildout.

AI IS ABOUT TO RESET THE WORLD’S INDUSTRIES 🤯 NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang says we’re entering the largest industrial buildout in human history driven by AI. Entire sectors are being rebuilt around AI infrastructure: 🤖 AI factories and chip plants 🤖 Robotics across $50T manufacturing 🤖 AI-powered telecom networks 🤖 Agentic retail and customer service 🤖 Real-time AI in media, gaming, and live video 🤖 Quantum + GPU hybrid systems Even telecom towers -- the backbone of the internet -- could soon become AI compute platforms at the edge. The message from NVIDIA’s GTC stage was clear: The next wave of AI isn’t just software -- it’s a global infrastructure buildout.

CryptosRus

28,976 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Jeff Bezos says Prometheus is not building AI to write better answers. It is building AI to help engineers design real machines faster. A jet engine can take 10 years to go from idea to production. Bezos wants that loop cut to five, then three, then one. "The next AI race is not chat. It is invention speed."

Jeff Bezos says Prometheus is not building AI to write better answers. It is building AI to help engineers design real machines faster. A jet engine can take 10 years to go from idea to production. Bezos wants that loop cut to five, then three, then one. "The next AI race is not chat. It is invention speed."

Jon Hernandez

12,717 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Daniel Roberts of $IREN just laid out the brutal reality of the AI infrastructure buildout. He noted we are still in the dial up era of AI. The ultimate choke point is power. It requires steel, concrete, and years of physical construction. Starting a gigawatt AI factory today means you will not see the first compute online until the 2030s. It takes 18 to 24 months just to get a utility company to confirm if a piece of land even has power access. The market is pricing in rapid software scaling, but the physical bottlenecks are severe and unavoidable. The capital moving into power generation and data center infrastructure is a multi year trend. It’s not a sprint it’s a marathon.

Daniel Roberts of $IREN just laid out the brutal reality of the AI infrastructure buildout. He noted we are still in the dial up era of AI. The ultimate choke point is power. It requires steel, concrete, and years of physical construction. Starting a gigawatt AI factory today means you will not see the first compute online until the 2030s. It takes 18 to 24 months just to get a utility company to confirm if a piece of land even has power access. The market is pricing in rapid software scaling, but the physical bottlenecks are severe and unavoidable. The capital moving into power generation and data center infrastructure is a multi year trend. It’s not a sprint it’s a marathon.

Patient Investor

176,637 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Elon Musk just confirmed when humans exit the AI development loop entirely. Not eventually. Not theoretically. He gave a date. Musk: “Humans are gradually getting less and less in the loop on the recursive self-improvement. Every successive model is built by the one before it.” The market still assumes thousands of engineers are hand-coding the next frontier model. The compute already took over the build. Musk: “That is happening to a large degree, but it’s not yet fully automated. It may be there, if not this year, but not later than next year.” Once biological friction is fully automated out of the loop, the AI arms race detaches from human comprehension. Permanently. Global markets are still planning for a gradual transition. That timeline is already dead. Interviewer: “Do you see a hard takeoff at that point?” Musk: “We’re in the hard takeoff. Right now.” Musk: “I go to sleep, there’s some massive AI breakthrough. And when I wake up there’s another one.” You don’t outrun autonomous, self-improving intelligence by hiring more biological engineers. By the time the hiring sprint finishes, the model has already iterated into something the job description can’t describe. The architects of intelligence are no longer biological. And the thing building itself didn’t ask for the job.

Elon Musk just confirmed when humans exit the AI development loop entirely. Not eventually. Not theoretically. He gave a date. Musk: “Humans are gradually getting less and less in the loop on the recursive self-improvement. Every successive model is built by the one before it.” The market still assumes thousands of engineers are hand-coding the next frontier model. The compute already took over the build. Musk: “That is happening to a large degree, but it’s not yet fully automated. It may be there, if not this year, but not later than next year.” Once biological friction is fully automated out of the loop, the AI arms race detaches from human comprehension. Permanently. Global markets are still planning for a gradual transition. That timeline is already dead. Interviewer: “Do you see a hard takeoff at that point?” Musk: “We’re in the hard takeoff. Right now.” Musk: “I go to sleep, there’s some massive AI breakthrough. And when I wake up there’s another one.” You don’t outrun autonomous, self-improving intelligence by hiring more biological engineers. By the time the hiring sprint finishes, the model has already iterated into something the job description can’t describe. The architects of intelligence are no longer biological. And the thing building itself didn’t ask for the job.

Dustin

323,101 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The BeyHive takes things way too literal. “Beyoncé hates AI.” Do y’all realize AI is in everything? That automated reply from her site and CÉCRED’? Payment processing? That’s AI too. She doesn’t hate AI. She hates a specific type of AI, y’all just grouped them into one. It’s 2025. Hating AI without understanding it isn’t just ironic, it’s costly. Opportunities, jobs, side hustles, content, business tools, they’re all being shaped by AI. If you’re still treating AI like it’s just ChatGPT or robots, you’re playing yourself out of relevance… and income. It’s like hating the internet in 2010. AI won’t replace jobs, it will replace those who don’t know how to use it.

The BeyHive takes things way too literal. “Beyoncé hates AI.” Do y’all realize AI is in everything? That automated reply from her site and CÉCRED’? Payment processing? That’s AI too. She doesn’t hate AI. She hates a specific type of AI, y’all just grouped them into one. It’s 2025. Hating AI without understanding it isn’t just ironic, it’s costly. Opportunities, jobs, side hustles, content, business tools, they’re all being shaped by AI. If you’re still treating AI like it’s just ChatGPT or robots, you’re playing yourself out of relevance… and income. It’s like hating the internet in 2010. AI won’t replace jobs, it will replace those who don’t know how to use it.

IChooseViolence

419,696 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“Just Change of one software to other doesn’t make it a better Aircraft” Air Chief can be heard saying this to HAL engineers leave the weapons capabilities. And we lost one Tejas due to same software glitch in February, if Chief is saying he speak with experience and knowledge.

“Just Change of one software to other doesn’t make it a better Aircraft” Air Chief can be heard saying this to HAL engineers leave the weapons capabilities. And we lost one Tejas due to same software glitch in February, if Chief is saying he speak with experience and knowledge.

Maj Digvijay Singh Rawat, Kirti Chakra (Retd)

55,985 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten