Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🤖 #AI automated schematic design — what takes a skilled engineer half a day, it finishes in just one hour ⚡. It’s not just software engineers being replaced, #hardware engineers are next 🔧. The AI era is hitting hard, and it’s terrifying. Can we even survive this? 🤔💭

18,346 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

32 Kommentare

Profilbild von Adam Taylor
Adam Taylorvor 17 Tagen

Think of the future like engineering in star trek

Profilbild von George Burgyan
George Burgyanvor 17 Tagen

Why even have schematic design? The project I’m working on is using SKiDL as the netlist generator, and I drop into PCB layout skipping the formal schematic step entirely. And since everything is data in the SKiDL layer, the AI can reason about that directly.

Profilbild von Sipeed
Sipeedvor 17 Tagen

AI still has many detail issues when drawing complex schematics. A readable schematic is needed for human review—otherwise, a pure netlist can't be checked. Did you try PCB more than 2000 pins? Is that still work and correct without human review?

Profilbild von George Burgyan
George Burgyanvor 17 Tagen

I'm still doing an absolute ton of reviews personally, so it's not completely AI. And layout (which also catches things) was entirely manual. The biggest win that I found was being able to quickly iterate on questions and design review questions. A typical workflow goes like: "check the connections of the ADC and cross-reference the datasheet to verify that everything in the reference ladder mux is correct." The schematic fundamentally still exists, but it's not in the KiCad (or whatever) format. The SKiDL is 100% isomorphic with with schematic capture, it's just not visual. It's the same as the software side for the same project (which is easier for me since that's my background). Heavy AI use, but I don't let it run wild. AI is great for some things, but I don't think it's a replacement for human judgement.

Profilbild von Luca Barbato
Luca Barbatovor 17 Tagen

Experience and taste cannot be replaced easily. That said vllm.cpp is shaping up, do you want it to support your new Infer Box from day 0? @mudler_it has experience with DGX Spark and contributions are welcome.

Profilbild von Sipeed
Sipeedvor 17 Tagen

@mudler_it Thanks, but it already supported!

Profilbild von Luca Barbato
Luca Barbatovor 17 Tagen

@mudler_it even better!

Profilbild von Michal
Michalvor 17 Tagen

Is this local agent with kicad mcp?

Profilbild von Yasir Prototyper
Yasir Prototypervor 17 Tagen

Tried AI-assisted schematic capture yet? The tech works seamlessly for traces, but the architecture... let's just say some things are better left un-disrupted. 😅

Profilbild von Sipeed
Sipeedvor 17 Tagen

We have put 1K+ opensource pcb project for AI learning, it is better than me now...

Profilbild von Yasir Prototyper
Yasir Prototypervor 15 Tagen

@SipeedLab Better at routing, maybe. But when parts hit supply chain dead ends, I'm the one making vendor calls at midnight. Not AI. 😅

Profilbild von philia
philiavor 17 Tagen

Soit tu en dit plus soit tu ne dis rien, là c'est juste une accroche marketing débile !

Profilbild von Joe Desbonnet
Joe Desbonnetvor 17 Tagen

My experiments with Kicad and codex and claude earlier this year were not very successful. It's the one time I was surprised by how poorly it performed. But that was with early 2026 models and very simplistic prompting. Maybe worth another shot.

Profilbild von Vineesh
Vineeshvor 17 Tagen

What did they use

Profilbild von Oliver
Olivervor 17 Tagen

@grok 用的是哪个画图工具

Profilbild von M. Ceyhan
M. Ceyhanvor 17 Tagen

Which ai please advice wanna to try.

Profilbild von 윤선우
윤선우vor 17 Tagen

와 대단한데요! 당장 사용하고 싶습니다!

Profilbild von Haka Haky
Haka Hakyvor 17 Tagen

Is this a skill or a fine-tuned model?

Profilbild von Mikhail Shevtsov
Mikhail Shevtsovvor 17 Tagen

We get more quality products faster due to AI help

Profilbild von Gene Kong
Gene Kongvor 17 Tagen

敢直接用不,感觉当前硬件设计95%都是参考设计缝合而成的,应该可以ai化

Profilbild von Sipeed
Sipeedvor 17 Tagen

不是参考设计缝合的

Profilbild von Sheral Tech
Sheral Techvor 12 Tagen

Amazing progress AI empowers engineers to innovate faster and achieve more.⚡🚀

Profilbild von 🃏
🃏vor 16 Tagen

Replace me babyyyy

Profilbild von cyber
cybervor 17 Tagen

Schematic design is easy, now do PCB routing...

Profilbild von Nedyalko Balkanov
Nedyalko Balkanovvor 17 Tagen

I can see it - in the future there would be just THE ENGINEER

Profilbild von TheRickestMorty
TheRickestMortyvor 17 Tagen

Can you write your own posts? I guess not.

Profilbild von Mark James Francis
Mark James Francisvor 17 Tagen

The best I've managed with ai so far is using kicad and konnect MCP. Do you know a better way for AI to create and iterate on a design?

Profilbild von bailout00
bailout00vor 6 Stunden

How do you handle sourcing decisions. I’m finding that’s the hardest part right now

Profilbild von shaunlucky
shaunluckyvor 16 Tagen

This was generated by KiCAD and MCP services on my computer. It's a very simple circuit, but the results don't seem to be very good.

Profilbild von Boz NZ
Boz NZvor 17 Tagen

Software is a little cheaper/faster to iterate mistakes on than hardware (for now) so it would still be worth running your design past an EE until our AI overlords take over fully.

Profilbild von Daniel Saul D.
Daniel Saul D.vor 16 Tagen

Hubo una época en que todos eran DJs y también sobrevivimos. A ver, que mande a imprimir la IA y revise si le quedó bien.

Profilbild von ali
alivor 17 Tagen

That is great.👍 What AI tool/skills/MCP server are you using?

Ähnliche Videos

Jensen Huang just explained why every company cutting engineers over AI is asking the entirely wrong question. Huang: “People say, I don’t need software engineers because apparently coding is going to be automated.” That was the narrative. Here is what Huang actually did. Huang: “I’ve given AIs to every one of my software engineers and hardware engineers and engineers period. 100% of NVIDIA has AI assistants, AI coders, and they’re busier than ever.” Not fewer engineers. Not smaller teams. Busier than ever. That is the line most companies are getting completely wrong right now. They hear “AI can write code” and immediately start cutting headcount. Huang did the opposite. He armed everyone. Huang: “And so the question is, what is the task versus what is the job? No different than a financial analyst; the task is mess around with spreadsheets, but the job is to make financial advice. The job is to help a customer.” Writing code was always the task. It was never the job. The job is architecture. Knowing what to build. Why it matters. How it fits into a system that actually creates value. Code is the execution layer between the idea and the outcome. Nothing more. When you automate that layer, you don’t eliminate the engineer. You eliminate the bottleneck between what they can envision and what they can ship. The companies using AI to cut headcount are optimizing for cost. The companies using AI to multiply output are optimizing for territory. Nvidia chose territory. Every engineer at the most valuable semiconductor company on Earth now operates with an AI assistant. Not a pilot program. Not an experiment. Company-wide. Every function. Every team. And the result is not less work. It is more work. Faster. At a scale that was physically impossible twelve months ago. The companies that understand the difference between eliminating engineers and unleashing them will build what comes next. The ones that don’t will watch their best talent walk out the door to the ones that did.

Dustin

82,823 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Some personal hot takes from AI: engineer Miami follows... 1. Software development is a dead-end profession because anyone can be a software developer now. 2. Anyone can use Cursor or any other tool and generate code. Being a coder and being a software engineer are different. 3. Computers used to be gated; now everyone has the power to make computers malleable. Everyone is a software developer now, but that does not mean they are software engineers 4. If you cannot demonstrate how a coding agent works, you are just a consumer and have imposed an artificial glass ceiling on your career as a software engineer. 5. If you are curious, you will have a job. If you have not been curious in the last two years, you are replaceable. 6. SaaS per-seat economics may become unstable as customers need fewer people to achieve results, prompting founders to think about new unit economics 7. Most companies will take two or three years (or more!) to figure out AI transformation. 8. Some companies are already building AI native teams of five to ten people who can build with the grain of AI 9. There will be an explosion in the number of software developers. Software development is now essentially free, and tokens are cheaper than humans 10. Not enough engineers know what it means to be a product engineer 11. JIRA ticket monkeys are cooked 12. If your company has banned AI, you should quit that company 13. AI is more like a musical instrument than just a tool play with it, make discoveries, build intuition learn where AI is good and where it fails

geoff

72,261 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten