Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

AI Digest No.69: When Images Deceive and Chatbots Shape Minds Here are five stories shaping this week in AI: 🎨 Nano Banana Pro Is the Best and the Most Dangerous CNET praises Google’s Nano Banana Pro for stunning realism and speed, but warns it can easily generate deceptive, hyperrealistic...

32,843 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

AI Digest No.72: When Deepfakes Escalate and AI Gets Closer Here are five stories shaping this week in AI: 🩺 ChatGPT Moves Into Healthcare OpenAI launched ChatGPT Health, allowing users to connect medical records for personalized insights. What looks like patient empowerment also raises hard questions about privacy, data security, and how much medical judgment should be delegated to AI. 🌍 Deepfakes Are Becoming a Geopolitical Weapon A Foreign Affairs analysis warns that deepfakes could destabilize global politics by fabricating evidence of attacks, manipulating elections, or triggering military escalation before verification is possible. 🤖 AI Assistants Start Acting on Our Behalf Lenovo revealed plans for an AI assistant that doesn’t just answer questions, but performs actions autonomously across devices and services. This marks a shift toward agentic AI systems that function as digital proxies, not just tools. 🏥 AI Quietly Reduces Emergency Room Waits In England, the NHS is using AI forecasting to predict emergency department demand and cut A&E waiting times. It’s a reminder that AI’s most meaningful impact often happens far from headlines. 🧍 Real Humans Push Back Against AI Content Floods As AI-generated content overwhelms social platforms, creators with authentic voices are gaining renewed traction. In a world of infinite generation, trust and originality are becoming the rarest assets online. Read the full digest on our Medium 👉

GT Protocol

33,187 views • 6 months ago

The Killer-App of AI isn't Chatbots, it's Social | Reid Hoffman Interview Mark Zuckerberg Mark Zuckerberg is making AI friends to supplement human friends: “The average American has 3 friends, but has demand for 15.” Reid Hoffman believes this is fundamentally the wrong approach. AI agents shouldn’t replace your human relationships but help you strengthen your relationship with them by acting as a facilitator. Make no mistake, just like the internet, AI’s killer-app won’t be single player information retrieval (chatbots), but multiplayer social. And rival AI platforms are currently being built with radically different philosophies that mirror their internet predecessors: - Meta: have people spend as much time virtually as possible - Linkedin: use the virtual to facilitate real-world interactions If you thought social media was influential in changing society, then the stakes of getting “AI Social” right are infinitely higher. I sit down with Reid Hoffman to explore the full scope of “AI-Social” from how it will transform traditional social media to what friendships and romantic relationships with AIs could look like. Timestamps 01:51 The Social Killer App for AI 09:35 The Secret to Creating Emotionally Intelligent AI 14:15 The Risk of AI Addiction 16:58 Could AI Follow the Same Dark Path as Social Media? 20:18 How Hoffman invests in the 7 deadly sins 25:36 Why AI Can't Replace Human Relationships 37:38 Our Fear of AI & Plato’s Fear of Books 48:42 How AI Could Change Philosophy 1:11:52 Why AI Benchmarks Matter More Than Regulation 1:13:23 The Most Important Skill of the Next Decade

Johnathan Bi

24,808 views • 1 year ago

This Google insider just revealed what AI is actually being used for behind closed doors. It has nothing to do with chatbots. Mo Gawdat was a senior executive at Google for over a decade. He watched AI get built from the inside. He was in the rooms, in the labs, in the government meetings in China that almost no Western executive was allowed into. And he just went on Diary of a CEO and said things that no active tech executive would ever be allowed to say publicly: "What the general public sees about AI is overhyped but ineffective. What the real geeks see inside the lab is genuinely world-changing." The public gets chatbots and AI-generated videos while the labs are building autonomous weapons systems, military targeting technology, real-time surveillance infrastructure, and self-improving code that rewrites itself every microsecond without human oversight. As Mo put it: "As we speak, we are living in two major wars where AI is doing most of the killing." He talked about Palantir's CEO Alex Karp openly celebrating how his targeting technology identifies and eliminates people. He talked about the next generation of autonomous weapons costing $20,000 each, meaning any government with a $50 billion defense budget can literally rain drones on every corner of the planet. And as you remember, Anthropic was offered a $500 million military contract to allow their AI to be used for human targeting and surveillance. They refused and walked away from the money. OpenAI took the contract the following week. Mo's response: "You have to start observing who is actually behaving in a way that makes AI work for humanity, and who is behaving in a way that makes AI work for their share price." Now this is where it gets really interesting... In Mo's documentary Chasing Utopia, Altman literally says directly on camera: "I suspect that AI is likely going to end humanity, but we're going to create a lot of interesting companies in the process." That is the CEO of the most powerful AI company on Earth saying that he suspects his OWN technology will end the human race and then shrugging it off because the business opportunity is too good to pass up. Mo's prediction for the next decade: War, economic collapse, mass unemployment, surveillance expansion, and an absolute concentration of power at the top unlike anything in modern history. His prediction after that is if humanity survives the next 10 years, AI will eventually create a world of abundance where intelligence solves every problem we currently face. But the path between here and there is what terrifies him. And the men building the technology know exactly what they're doing. Do you think he's just exaggerating for attention, or is there truth in this?

Ricardo

196,843 views • 1 month ago