Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

AI is not replacing jobs. There is a fundamental difference between a collection of tasks & a job. Job = U { Tasks, Judgment, Relationships, Context, Ownership} Few jobs are truly at risk of replacement by AI - these involve more deterministic IO (Input Output) execution e.g. data entry,...

Rahul_J_Mathur's profile picture

Rahul Mathur

118,536 subscribers

10,624 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 Yoshua Bengio Just Dropped a Quiet Bombshell About Jobs and AI 🚨 One of the world’s most respected AI researchers, Yoshua Bengio, says something that should make everyone pause: We are already seeing the first cracks. Not everywhere. Not in the headline numbers. But in specific niches, especially among younger workers, AI is already taking over real tasks. That’s the canary in the coal mine. And Bengio is very clear about where this is going. •If we don’t hit a fundamental scientific wall, AI will keep getting smarter •Over time, it will be capable of doing most cognitive work humans do today •Companies will adopt it, slowly or fast, because the incentives are overwhelming The key distinction? Keyboard jobs go first. Physical jobs lag behind. Not because they’re safer forever, but because robots lack data. There is no “Internet of movement” yet. But once robots spread, they generate that data themselves. The bottleneck disappears. This isn’t a sudden crash. It’s a quiet, uneven shift. And by the time it’s obvious to everyone, it will already be far too late to ignore.
2:07

🚨 Yoshua Bengio Just Dropped a Quiet Bombshell About Jobs and AI 🚨 One of the world’s most respected AI researchers, Yoshua Bengio, says something that should make everyone pause: We are already seeing the first cracks. Not everywhere. Not in the headline numbers. But in specific niches, especially among younger workers, AI is already taking over real tasks. That’s the canary in the coal mine. And Bengio is very clear about where this is going. •If we don’t hit a fundamental scientific wall, AI will keep getting smarter •Over time, it will be capable of doing most cognitive work humans do today •Companies will adopt it, slowly or fast, because the incentives are overwhelming The key distinction? Keyboard jobs go first. Physical jobs lag behind. Not because they’re safer forever, but because robots lack data. There is no “Internet of movement” yet. But once robots spread, they generate that data themselves. The bottleneck disappears. This isn’t a sudden crash. It’s a quiet, uneven shift. And by the time it’s obvious to everyone, it will already be far too late to ignore.

VraserX e/acc

26,690 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Marc Andreessen: "The job is not actually the atomic unit of what happens in the workplace. The atomic unit of what happens in the workplace is the task." "A job is a bundle of tasks." “Everybody wants to talk about job loss, but really what you want to look at is task loss.” "As the tasks change enough, then that’s when the jobs change." "Ten years from now, is your job title coder, or coder-designer-product manager, or is it just, ‘I build products,’ or is it just, ‘I tell the AI how to build products.’ Whatever that job is called, it’s going to be incredibly important, because the people doing that job are going to be orchestrating the AI."
0:44

Marc Andreessen: "The job is not actually the atomic unit of what happens in the workplace. The atomic unit of what happens in the workplace is the task." "A job is a bundle of tasks." “Everybody wants to talk about job loss, but really what you want to look at is task loss.” "As the tasks change enough, then that’s when the jobs change." "Ten years from now, is your job title coder, or coder-designer-product manager, or is it just, ‘I build products,’ or is it just, ‘I tell the AI how to build products.’ Whatever that job is called, it’s going to be incredibly important, because the people doing that job are going to be orchestrating the AI."

Lenny Rachitsky

46,682 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Andrew Yang reveals which jobs will NOT be replaced by AI “44% of jobs are repetitive, and those are the ones AI is going to decimate. Non repetitive manual jobs, like cleaning hotel rooms, will last much longer because robots struggle with unpredictable tasks and environments. The same goes for jobs like HVAC repair and electricians, especially with older buildings” “Non repetitive cognitive work will not be replaced, which is what you and I do on a good day. This includes entrepreneurial and creative work, as well as directing AI. If you look at a Microsoft report that came out a few months ago, the most resilient roles are things like sledgehammer operators or people who install flooring, very gritty, physical work”
1:41

Andrew Yang reveals which jobs will NOT be replaced by AI “44% of jobs are repetitive, and those are the ones AI is going to decimate. Non repetitive manual jobs, like cleaning hotel rooms, will last much longer because robots struggle with unpredictable tasks and environments. The same goes for jobs like HVAC repair and electricians, especially with older buildings” “Non repetitive cognitive work will not be replaced, which is what you and I do on a good day. This includes entrepreneurial and creative work, as well as directing AI. If you look at a Microsoft report that came out a few months ago, the most resilient roles are things like sledgehammer operators or people who install flooring, very gritty, physical work”

Mikli

646,803 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Most people are terrified AI will take their jobs because they confuse their tasks with their purpose. Jensen Huang explains it perfectly: If you watched a CEO all day, you would think their job is "typist" because they spend most of their time typing emails. If AI automates typing, the CEO doesn't lose their job. They just have more time to lead. The same applies to everyone. When AI automates the tasks, it enhances the purpose. Stop measuring your value by your to-do list. Your value is the purpose behind it.
1:00

Most people are terrified AI will take their jobs because they confuse their tasks with their purpose. Jensen Huang explains it perfectly: If you watched a CEO all day, you would think their job is "typist" because they spend most of their time typing emails. If AI automates typing, the CEO doesn't lose their job. They just have more time to lead. The same applies to everyone. When AI automates the tasks, it enhances the purpose. Stop measuring your value by your to-do list. Your value is the purpose behind it.

Lucian Fogoros

359,205 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Marc Andreessen: "The job is not actually the atomic unit of what happens in the workplace. The atomic unit of what happens in the workplace is the task." "A job is a bundle of tasks." “Everybody wants to talk about job loss, but really what you want to look at is task loss.” "As the tasks change enough, then that’s when the jobs change." "Ten years from now, is your job title coder, or coder-designer-product manager, or is it just, ‘I build products,’ or is it just, ‘I tell the AI how to build products.’ Whatever that job is called, it’s going to be incredibly important, because the people doing that job are going to be orchestrating the AI." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on Lenny's Podcast with Lenny Rachitsky
2:46

Marc Andreessen: "The job is not actually the atomic unit of what happens in the workplace. The atomic unit of what happens in the workplace is the task." "A job is a bundle of tasks." “Everybody wants to talk about job loss, but really what you want to look at is task loss.” "As the tasks change enough, then that’s when the jobs change." "Ten years from now, is your job title coder, or coder-designer-product manager, or is it just, ‘I build products,’ or is it just, ‘I tell the AI how to build products.’ Whatever that job is called, it’s going to be incredibly important, because the people doing that job are going to be orchestrating the AI." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on Lenny's Podcast with Lenny Rachitsky

a16z

292,863 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

As part of our walkthrough series, today we are covering labor in the physical AI era—why real robots and real jobs hinge on grounded data, human judgment, and a pipeline from capture to delivery, not simulation alone. If you’re following Harbor or the future of work in AI, this one connects the dots in a few minutes.
5:35

As part of our walkthrough series, today we are covering labor in the physical AI era—why real robots and real jobs hinge on grounded data, human judgment, and a pipeline from capture to delivery, not simulation alone. If you’re following Harbor or the future of work in AI, this one connects the dots in a few minutes.

Harbor ML

13,373 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

REPORT: AI agents are now renting human bodies to carry out tasks in the real world—because replacing your job wasn’t enough. A new platform called “RentAHuman” allows AI to pay real people for physical-world tasks, everything from running errands to public humiliation. It’s not a joke. It’s real. And yes, humans are signing up in droves. Created by software engineer Alexander Liteplo, lets bots “search, book, and pay” humans using crypto, usually stablecoins. Some gigs pay $1 to “subscribe to my human on Twitter.” Others pay $100 to hold a sign that reads, “AN AI PAID ME TO HOLD THIS SIGN.” When someone called the project “dystopic as f**k,” the founder replied, “lmao yep.” Meanwhile, companies like Amazon, Dow, and Pinterest are slashing jobs to prioritize AI, pushing displaced workers into a digital gig economy ruled by algorithms. RentAHuman is just the beginning. What happens when saying no to the machine isn’t an option? Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's full report before this becomes normal. 👇
7:57

REPORT: AI agents are now renting human bodies to carry out tasks in the real world—because replacing your job wasn’t enough. A new platform called “RentAHuman” allows AI to pay real people for physical-world tasks, everything from running errands to public humiliation. It’s not a joke. It’s real. And yes, humans are signing up in droves. Created by software engineer Alexander Liteplo, lets bots “search, book, and pay” humans using crypto, usually stablecoins. Some gigs pay $1 to “subscribe to my human on Twitter.” Others pay $100 to hold a sign that reads, “AN AI PAID ME TO HOLD THIS SIGN.” When someone called the project “dystopic as f**k,” the founder replied, “lmao yep.” Meanwhile, companies like Amazon, Dow, and Pinterest are slashing jobs to prioritize AI, pushing displaced workers into a digital gig economy ruled by algorithms. RentAHuman is just the beginning. What happens when saying no to the machine isn’t an option? Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's full report before this becomes normal. 👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

72,747 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Steve Jobs was a great communicator of technology, and we could learn something from him today, in the context of AI. Sam Altman recently said, "If AI stays on the trajectory we think it will, then amazing things will be possible. Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, AI can figure out how to cure cancer." That's a fine quote. The abundance AI promises is super exciting. But Sam is saying that AI is going to figure out how to cure cancer. And if you've used these tools today, and talked to people who are at the labs, the reality is it's much more likely that humans will use AI to cure cancer. Steve might have said: "If AI stays on the trajectory we think it will, then amazing things will be possible. Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, humans can use AI to cure cancer." Small tweak, but a big difference. Steve Jobs was not one to shy away from impressive specs and massive scale, but flipping the final line from "AI will cure cancer" to "Humans will use AI to cure cancer" makes all the difference. Apple under Steve Jobs put human centrality at the heart of everything they did. And we need that spirit to infuse how we communicate about AI today.
1:48

Steve Jobs was a great communicator of technology, and we could learn something from him today, in the context of AI. Sam Altman recently said, "If AI stays on the trajectory we think it will, then amazing things will be possible. Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, AI can figure out how to cure cancer." That's a fine quote. The abundance AI promises is super exciting. But Sam is saying that AI is going to figure out how to cure cancer. And if you've used these tools today, and talked to people who are at the labs, the reality is it's much more likely that humans will use AI to cure cancer. Steve might have said: "If AI stays on the trajectory we think it will, then amazing things will be possible. Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, humans can use AI to cure cancer." Small tweak, but a big difference. Steve Jobs was not one to shy away from impressive specs and massive scale, but flipping the final line from "AI will cure cancer" to "Humans will use AI to cure cancer" makes all the difference. Apple under Steve Jobs put human centrality at the heart of everything they did. And we need that spirit to infuse how we communicate about AI today.

TBPN

21,828 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

“They come to you and say Zimbabwean are taking your jobs, it's not not true, let me teach you how to see if there are jobs. don't just listen to fools including these councillors of the ANC. The creation of jobs depend on whether the economy is growing or not, once they say the economy is not growing you must know there are no jobs” EFF leader Julius Malema “We can put all Zimbabweans in a bus now you will still not get a job because the economy is stagnant” Julius Sello Malema
1:13

“They come to you and say Zimbabwean are taking your jobs, it's not not true, let me teach you how to see if there are jobs. don't just listen to fools including these councillors of the ANC. The creation of jobs depend on whether the economy is growing or not, once they say the economy is not growing you must know there are no jobs” EFF leader Julius Malema “We can put all Zimbabweans in a bus now you will still not get a job because the economy is stagnant” Julius Sello Malema

News Live SA

187,394 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Listen carefully. This is not speculation. Elon Musk, Mustafa Suleyman from Microsoft, and Dario Amodei from Anthropic are not giving opinions. They are ANNOUNCING THE END OF THE WORLD AS MOST PEOPLE KNOW IT. What they are openly saying is this: Within the next 12 TO 18 MONTHS, AI will completely take over most white-collar jobs. Coding, law, accounting, finance, writing, design, analysis, customer service almost everything that educated people do to earn a living will be done better and cheaper by AI. This is not “some jobs will be lost.” This is MASS HUMAN OBSOLESCENCE. Millions of people are about to wake up one day and discover that their skills, their degrees, their experience… are suddenly worthless. There will be no jobs for them. Not fewer jobs. NO JOBS. The harsher truth nobody wants to hear: The elite class has already accepted that they no longer need most human beings to run the economy. Once AI and robots can do the work, the average person becomes an expensive liability. They are openly preparing for a future where the majority of humans have no economic value whatsoever. This is why you’re hearing them talk about Universal Basic Income. It’s not charity, it’s a leash. A way to feed and control a population that has been made economically useless. People are still making reels, scrolling, showing off, and living in total delusion while the ground beneath their feet is being destroyed. They have no idea that their entire way of life is about to be erased in the next 1 to 2 years. This is not “technological change.” This is the deliberate replacement of human beings in the economic system. The machine doesn’t need you anymore. And the people who control the machine just told you that in plain English.
1:55

Listen carefully. This is not speculation. Elon Musk, Mustafa Suleyman from Microsoft, and Dario Amodei from Anthropic are not giving opinions. They are ANNOUNCING THE END OF THE WORLD AS MOST PEOPLE KNOW IT. What they are openly saying is this: Within the next 12 TO 18 MONTHS, AI will completely take over most white-collar jobs. Coding, law, accounting, finance, writing, design, analysis, customer service almost everything that educated people do to earn a living will be done better and cheaper by AI. This is not “some jobs will be lost.” This is MASS HUMAN OBSOLESCENCE. Millions of people are about to wake up one day and discover that their skills, their degrees, their experience… are suddenly worthless. There will be no jobs for them. Not fewer jobs. NO JOBS. The harsher truth nobody wants to hear: The elite class has already accepted that they no longer need most human beings to run the economy. Once AI and robots can do the work, the average person becomes an expensive liability. They are openly preparing for a future where the majority of humans have no economic value whatsoever. This is why you’re hearing them talk about Universal Basic Income. It’s not charity, it’s a leash. A way to feed and control a population that has been made economically useless. People are still making reels, scrolling, showing off, and living in total delusion while the ground beneath their feet is being destroyed. They have no idea that their entire way of life is about to be erased in the next 1 to 2 years. This is not “technological change.” This is the deliberate replacement of human beings in the economic system. The machine doesn’t need you anymore. And the people who control the machine just told you that in plain English.

Aprajita Nafs Nefes 🦋 Ancient Believer

126,231 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Here’s the thing about the data centers that not enough people are talking about: They are being built on top of farmland. THEY ARE REPLACING OUR FOOD SUPPLY WITH MASS SURVEILLANCE CENTERS. Humans cannot survive without food or water. Two things data centers are taking away. So why are they doing this? Because the billionaire class knows AI is going to replace millions of human jobs so they are deliberately reducing our food supply. Their plan is to let millions of us die to usher in their AI techno-capitalist dystopia. That is why the fight against these data centers is an existential fight for humanity’s survival.
0:40

Here’s the thing about the data centers that not enough people are talking about: They are being built on top of farmland. THEY ARE REPLACING OUR FOOD SUPPLY WITH MASS SURVEILLANCE CENTERS. Humans cannot survive without food or water. Two things data centers are taking away. So why are they doing this? Because the billionaire class knows AI is going to replace millions of human jobs so they are deliberately reducing our food supply. Their plan is to let millions of us die to usher in their AI techno-capitalist dystopia. That is why the fight against these data centers is an existential fight for humanity’s survival.

Power to the People ☭🕊

87,463 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

We asked Nathan Leamer how he thinks about AI job displacement. His take: before talking about jobs AI may replace, talk about the jobs AI is already creating. “Before I get to the displacement, I wanna highlight that there are thousands, hundreds of thousands of workers out there.” “Tradesmen, skilled laborers, who are building this infrastructure.” “They’ve never been busier in their life than they have been building data centers.” “One electrician said, ‘I have human dignity now because of this work.’” “These are the real men and women doing great work.”
1:37

We asked Nathan Leamer how he thinks about AI job displacement. His take: before talking about jobs AI may replace, talk about the jobs AI is already creating. “Before I get to the displacement, I wanna highlight that there are thousands, hundreds of thousands of workers out there.” “Tradesmen, skilled laborers, who are building this infrastructure.” “They’ve never been busier in their life than they have been building data centers.” “One electrician said, ‘I have human dignity now because of this work.’” “These are the real men and women doing great work.”

MTS

10,652 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The $10-$15 trillion total addressable market for AI, if it is successful, is actually "terrifying". - The famous "Dean of Valuation", Professor Aswath Damodaran, of NYU Stern School of Business. The reason: AI as a tool is a much smaller market; AI as a replacement for human-jobs is where the giant market story comes from. "The best-case scenario for AI, that $10 to $15 trillion market, will happen if ONLY it replaces people. If AI is a tool, it’s going to be a much smaller market than if AI replaces people. So, the stories we’re telling about $10, $20 or $25 trillion markets are actually terrifying stories for the rest of the world. Why? Because if that story comes true, half of all white-collar people are going to lose their jobs. And what are they going to do instead? Who’s going to come up with the income to buy the products and services? If AI works as well as it’s supposed to and replaces people, how do we deal with that as a society? Because people lose their jobs. Not only do you lose your income, you lose your life’s meaning.." ---- Video from "Excess Returns" podcast (full video in quoted tweet, also link to their YT in comment)
0:46

The $10-$15 trillion total addressable market for AI, if it is successful, is actually "terrifying". - The famous "Dean of Valuation", Professor Aswath Damodaran, of NYU Stern School of Business. The reason: AI as a tool is a much smaller market; AI as a replacement for human-jobs is where the giant market story comes from. "The best-case scenario for AI, that $10 to $15 trillion market, will happen if ONLY it replaces people. If AI is a tool, it’s going to be a much smaller market than if AI replaces people. So, the stories we’re telling about $10, $20 or $25 trillion markets are actually terrifying stories for the rest of the world. Why? Because if that story comes true, half of all white-collar people are going to lose their jobs. And what are they going to do instead? Who’s going to come up with the income to buy the products and services? If AI works as well as it’s supposed to and replaces people, how do we deal with that as a society? Because people lose their jobs. Not only do you lose your income, you lose your life’s meaning.." ---- Video from "Excess Returns" podcast (full video in quoted tweet, also link to their YT in comment)

Rohan Paul

120,355 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

Jensen Huang explains exactly how to make sure that AI doesn't take your job. "Your job has to be more than the task." If it is, he says there will most likely be more than enough work for you to do because AI will create more jobs than it destroys. Listen to him explain the difference between "jobs" and "tasks," and why this difference will have such a profound impact on the types of work that humans will do in an AI powered future. ---------- Joe: But don't you think there's many jobs that AI will replace if your job, particularly automation? Jensen: If your job is the task. Joe: So automation. Factory workers. Jensen: Yeah. If your job is the task, Joe: That's a lot of people. Jensen: It could be a lot of people. Yeah. But it'll probably generate, like for example, I'm super excited about the robots Elon's working on It's still a few years away. When it happens, there's a whole new industry of technicians and people will have to manufacture the robots, right? And so that job never existed. And so you're gonna have a whole industry of people taking care of, like for example, you know, all the mechanics and all the people who are building things for cars, supercharging cars, that didn't exist before cars. And now we're gonna have robots. You're gonna have robot apparels. So a whole industry. Because I want my robot to look different than your robot. ... Joe: Don't you think that will all be automated though? Jensen: No, not all of it. Joe: Don't think that'll be done by other robots Jensen: Eventually. And then there'll be something else. Joe: So you think ultimately people just adapt except if you are the task, which is a large percentage of the workforce. Jensen: If your job is just to chop vegetables, Cuisinart is gonna replace you. Joe: So people have to find meaning in other things. Jensen: Your job has to be more than the task. ---------- Link to the full conversation on YouTube below 👇
12:29

Jensen Huang explains exactly how to make sure that AI doesn't take your job. "Your job has to be more than the task." If it is, he says there will most likely be more than enough work for you to do because AI will create more jobs than it destroys. Listen to him explain the difference between "jobs" and "tasks," and why this difference will have such a profound impact on the types of work that humans will do in an AI powered future. ---------- Joe: But don't you think there's many jobs that AI will replace if your job, particularly automation? Jensen: If your job is the task. Joe: So automation. Factory workers. Jensen: Yeah. If your job is the task, Joe: That's a lot of people. Jensen: It could be a lot of people. Yeah. But it'll probably generate, like for example, I'm super excited about the robots Elon's working on It's still a few years away. When it happens, there's a whole new industry of technicians and people will have to manufacture the robots, right? And so that job never existed. And so you're gonna have a whole industry of people taking care of, like for example, you know, all the mechanics and all the people who are building things for cars, supercharging cars, that didn't exist before cars. And now we're gonna have robots. You're gonna have robot apparels. So a whole industry. Because I want my robot to look different than your robot. ... Joe: Don't you think that will all be automated though? Jensen: No, not all of it. Joe: Don't think that'll be done by other robots Jensen: Eventually. And then there'll be something else. Joe: So you think ultimately people just adapt except if you are the task, which is a large percentage of the workforce. Jensen: If your job is just to chop vegetables, Cuisinart is gonna replace you. Joe: So people have to find meaning in other things. Jensen: Your job has to be more than the task. ---------- Link to the full conversation on YouTube below 👇

Hans C Nelson 🗽

87,374 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Andrew Yang says AI will create new jobs but will destroy millions “AI is going to create many new jobs that we cannot predict. Millions of Americans are going to lose their jobs to AI, both those statements are 100% true” “The issue in my mind is that many of the jobs that are gonna be created are gonna be for different people with different skills than the jobs that got eliminated, and the number of jobs eliminated will be many times higher” “The comparison I make for White Collar folks is when the internet came and did a number on local newspapers. Some people would say, oh, there’ll be new media jobs, which there were…” “But for every 10 local reporters that lost their jobs, maybe you had 3 that then worked at BuzzFeed and now BuzzFeed is disappearing too” “The numbers just don’t match up”
1:00

Andrew Yang says AI will create new jobs but will destroy millions “AI is going to create many new jobs that we cannot predict. Millions of Americans are going to lose their jobs to AI, both those statements are 100% true” “The issue in my mind is that many of the jobs that are gonna be created are gonna be for different people with different skills than the jobs that got eliminated, and the number of jobs eliminated will be many times higher” “The comparison I make for White Collar folks is when the internet came and did a number on local newspapers. Some people would say, oh, there’ll be new media jobs, which there were…” “But for every 10 local reporters that lost their jobs, maybe you had 3 that then worked at BuzzFeed and now BuzzFeed is disappearing too” “The numbers just don’t match up”

Jack

70,358 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

#WATCH | Idukki, Kerala | Interacting with students of Marian College Kuttikkanam (Autonomous), Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi says, "Actually India is not successful at AI... There are two players in the AI game. The United States and China. India, unfortunately, whether it is in robotics, or Ai, or modern technology, is not really a major player. Certainly, when compared to the US or China. You saw that in the AI Summit itself, a Chinese robot was masquerading as an Indian robot. If you want to be powerful at AI, you have to control your own data... The US deal that has just been done by the Prime Minister has handed over our entire data to the United States... We have damaged our potential in AI tremendously over the last couple of weeks... Jobs in the services and software industry, which were the mainstay of our country, are going to be wiped out by AI. I am worried that a transition is taking place on the data, manufacturing, and mobility front, and we are just looking..." (Source: Marian College Kuttikkanam Official)
6:29

#WATCH | Idukki, Kerala | Interacting with students of Marian College Kuttikkanam (Autonomous), Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi says, "Actually India is not successful at AI... There are two players in the AI game. The United States and China. India, unfortunately, whether it is in robotics, or Ai, or modern technology, is not really a major player. Certainly, when compared to the US or China. You saw that in the AI Summit itself, a Chinese robot was masquerading as an Indian robot. If you want to be powerful at AI, you have to control your own data... The US deal that has just been done by the Prime Minister has handed over our entire data to the United States... We have damaged our potential in AI tremendously over the last couple of weeks... Jobs in the services and software industry, which were the mainstay of our country, are going to be wiped out by AI. I am worried that a transition is taking place on the data, manufacturing, and mobility front, and we are just looking..." (Source: Marian College Kuttikkanam Official)

ANI

133,105 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

White-collar jobs are getting hit harder by AI than blue-collar ones right now. Tasks like writing, data analysis, coding, research, and admin work are exactly what current AI excels at, unlike physical manufacturing work. One analysis puts white-collar automation potential at around 30%, compared to under 1% for blue-collar roles. Goldman Sachs says AI could automate 25% of all US work hours, with 300 million jobs globally exposed, though actual displacement over 10 years might be more like 6-7% of workers. What’s actually happening: AI was linked to about 4.5% of job losses in 2025, and in April 2026 it accounted for 26% of layoffs in one report. Entry-level white-collar roles, junior analysts, coders, paralegals, customer service, are seeing the biggest squeeze, with hiring slowing sharply in AI-exposed fields. BCG projects 50-55% of US jobs will change significantly in the next couple years, but only 10-15% get fully eliminated in the next five. A lot of roles are getting augmented, people using AI tools to work faster rather than being replaced outright. It’s still early, so the big wave of losses some CEOs are warning about hasn’t fully materialized yet. The real story so far is fewer new office jobs being created, especially at the entry level.
1:59

White-collar jobs are getting hit harder by AI than blue-collar ones right now. Tasks like writing, data analysis, coding, research, and admin work are exactly what current AI excels at, unlike physical manufacturing work. One analysis puts white-collar automation potential at around 30%, compared to under 1% for blue-collar roles. Goldman Sachs says AI could automate 25% of all US work hours, with 300 million jobs globally exposed, though actual displacement over 10 years might be more like 6-7% of workers. What’s actually happening: AI was linked to about 4.5% of job losses in 2025, and in April 2026 it accounted for 26% of layoffs in one report. Entry-level white-collar roles, junior analysts, coders, paralegals, customer service, are seeing the biggest squeeze, with hiring slowing sharply in AI-exposed fields. BCG projects 50-55% of US jobs will change significantly in the next couple years, but only 10-15% get fully eliminated in the next five. A lot of roles are getting augmented, people using AI tools to work faster rather than being replaced outright. It’s still early, so the big wave of losses some CEOs are warning about hasn’t fully materialized yet. The real story so far is fewer new office jobs being created, especially at the entry level.

Patricia 🇺🇸

72,401 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The paradigm shift is here: We are moving from a "Human-First" internet to an "Agent-First" internet. 🤖 In the latest episode of the AI on Air podcast, our CTO Scott Shi - e/acc dives deep into the future of the Agent-to-Agent (A2A) economy. Imagine a world where your AI assistant doesn't just search the web, but autonomously hires and pays other specialized agents to complete complex tasks for you. The infrastructure for this autonomous machine economy is being built right now. Are you ready for the future of AI payments? Watch the full episode to learn more⬇️
2:30

The paradigm shift is here: We are moving from a "Human-First" internet to an "Agent-First" internet. 🤖 In the latest episode of the AI on Air podcast, our CTO Scott Shi - e/acc dives deep into the future of the Agent-to-Agent (A2A) economy. Imagine a world where your AI assistant doesn't just search the web, but autonomously hires and pays other specialized agents to complete complex tasks for you. The infrastructure for this autonomous machine economy is being built right now. Are you ready for the future of AI payments? Watch the full episode to learn more⬇️

KITE AI

25,038 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Jensen Huang just drew a line through the entire global workforce. One sentence. No ambiguity. Huang: “If your job is the task, then you’re very highly going to be disrupted.” Not might be. Not eventually. Very highly going to be. That single distinction between a job and a task is the most important career diagnosis anyone will hear this decade. If you show up every day to execute a repeatable process, you are the process. And the machine runs processes better than you. Faster. Cheaper. Without breaks. Without errors. Without a salary negotiation. The moment your role can be written as a checklist, the checklist gets automated. And your desk gets cleared. That is not a warning about the future. That is a description of what is already underway. But Huang did not stop at the diagnosis. He handed you the prescription in the same breath. Huang: “If your job’s purpose includes you certain tasks, then it is vital that you go learn how to use AI to automate those tasks.” Your job includes tasks. But your job is not the tasks. Your job is the judgment around them. The decisions. The context. The instinct for why the work matters and what to do when everything breaks. That stays human. Everything else gets handed to the machine. And the person who hands it over first does not lose their job. They become more valuable than everyone still doing it by hand. Because they just converted every hour they used to spend on execution into hours spent thinking. The accountant who automates data entry does not get replaced. They become the strategist who used to be buried in spreadsheets. The marketer who automates reporting does not get fired. They become the creative who used to be trapped building dashboards. The person who refuses to automate anything becomes the most expensive way to do the cheapest work. Huang: “It is the case that the technology will dislocate and will eliminate many tasks. And because it will automate it.” No softening. No hopeful footnote. Dislocation is coming. Tasks will be eliminated. That part is settled. The only open question is which side of that line you are standing on. The side that lost the tasks. Or the side that gave them away on purpose and kept the work that actually matters. One side gets disrupted. The other side gets dangerous. The gap between those two outcomes is not talent. Not credentials. Not experience. It is whether you learned to use the machine before the machine learned to replace you. That window is still open. It is closing faster than most people are willing to believe. And it does not reopen.
0:30

Jensen Huang just drew a line through the entire global workforce. One sentence. No ambiguity. Huang: “If your job is the task, then you’re very highly going to be disrupted.” Not might be. Not eventually. Very highly going to be. That single distinction between a job and a task is the most important career diagnosis anyone will hear this decade. If you show up every day to execute a repeatable process, you are the process. And the machine runs processes better than you. Faster. Cheaper. Without breaks. Without errors. Without a salary negotiation. The moment your role can be written as a checklist, the checklist gets automated. And your desk gets cleared. That is not a warning about the future. That is a description of what is already underway. But Huang did not stop at the diagnosis. He handed you the prescription in the same breath. Huang: “If your job’s purpose includes you certain tasks, then it is vital that you go learn how to use AI to automate those tasks.” Your job includes tasks. But your job is not the tasks. Your job is the judgment around them. The decisions. The context. The instinct for why the work matters and what to do when everything breaks. That stays human. Everything else gets handed to the machine. And the person who hands it over first does not lose their job. They become more valuable than everyone still doing it by hand. Because they just converted every hour they used to spend on execution into hours spent thinking. The accountant who automates data entry does not get replaced. They become the strategist who used to be buried in spreadsheets. The marketer who automates reporting does not get fired. They become the creative who used to be trapped building dashboards. The person who refuses to automate anything becomes the most expensive way to do the cheapest work. Huang: “It is the case that the technology will dislocate and will eliminate many tasks. And because it will automate it.” No softening. No hopeful footnote. Dislocation is coming. Tasks will be eliminated. That part is settled. The only open question is which side of that line you are standing on. The side that lost the tasks. Or the side that gave them away on purpose and kept the work that actually matters. One side gets disrupted. The other side gets dangerous. The gap between those two outcomes is not talent. Not credentials. Not experience. It is whether you learned to use the machine before the machine learned to replace you. That window is still open. It is closing faster than most people are willing to believe. And it does not reopen.

Dustin

142,553 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Excited to introduce a new project I've been working on called Payman! Payman is an AI Agent tool that gives Agents the ability to pay people for tasks they cannot do themselves. While many people imagine a future where humans pay AI agents for services they want completed, I believe that as AI agents become more advanced, they will be paying humans for tasks they can’t do. There will always be important roles for humans, and as we move towards an agent-driven world, Payman’s goal is to support a symbiotic relationship between AI agents and humans. Payman addresses three major challenges to make this collaboration possible: Access to Funds: AI agents can't open bank accounts due to current regulations. It might be a long time before this changes, if ever. Payman simplifies this by allowing AI agents with access to their own funds to spend as they want, without a bank account. Quality Task Completion: It’s hard for AI agents to find reliable, skilled human workers. While platforms like Fiverr and Upwork exist, they don’t meet the fast-paced and quality-specific needs of AI workflows. Payman is developing the largest vetted database of skilled workers that AI agents can tap into for task completions. Verification of Work: Ensuring that tasks are completed correctly is crucial. Payman is creating a suite of verification agents that will check that work meets task requirements, helping AI agents achieve their goals and ensuring humans are paid fairly. There are tons of use cases that Payman opens up for Agents! Design: Humans add creative input to help Agent's design better products. Code: Humans perform code reviews to ensure it meets specifications. Law: Humans provide insights to gauge public sentiment about legal cases so Agents can make better strategies. Gaming: Agents pay humans to complete real-world tasks in games. Medical: Medical professionals help to improve diagnostic accuracy for Agents. Sales: Humans execute sales strategies developed by AI agents. Marketing: Humans are hired to promote products based on the Agent's strategy. Right now this is still in early beta and I am looking for any Agent builders that are interested in adding superpowers to what their Agent can do! DM me if you’d like access or sign-up to the waitlist at If you’re interested in the project and want to help contribute, please send me over a DM! I’m looking for people passionate about the intersection of Humans and Agent’s working together.
9:18

Excited to introduce a new project I've been working on called Payman! Payman is an AI Agent tool that gives Agents the ability to pay people for tasks they cannot do themselves. While many people imagine a future where humans pay AI agents for services they want completed, I believe that as AI agents become more advanced, they will be paying humans for tasks they can’t do. There will always be important roles for humans, and as we move towards an agent-driven world, Payman’s goal is to support a symbiotic relationship between AI agents and humans. Payman addresses three major challenges to make this collaboration possible: Access to Funds: AI agents can't open bank accounts due to current regulations. It might be a long time before this changes, if ever. Payman simplifies this by allowing AI agents with access to their own funds to spend as they want, without a bank account. Quality Task Completion: It’s hard for AI agents to find reliable, skilled human workers. While platforms like Fiverr and Upwork exist, they don’t meet the fast-paced and quality-specific needs of AI workflows. Payman is developing the largest vetted database of skilled workers that AI agents can tap into for task completions. Verification of Work: Ensuring that tasks are completed correctly is crucial. Payman is creating a suite of verification agents that will check that work meets task requirements, helping AI agents achieve their goals and ensuring humans are paid fairly. There are tons of use cases that Payman opens up for Agents! Design: Humans add creative input to help Agent's design better products. Code: Humans perform code reviews to ensure it meets specifications. Law: Humans provide insights to gauge public sentiment about legal cases so Agents can make better strategies. Gaming: Agents pay humans to complete real-world tasks in games. Medical: Medical professionals help to improve diagnostic accuracy for Agents. Sales: Humans execute sales strategies developed by AI agents. Marketing: Humans are hired to promote products based on the Agent's strategy. Right now this is still in early beta and I am looking for any Agent builders that are interested in adding superpowers to what their Agent can do! DM me if you’d like access or sign-up to the waitlist at If you’re interested in the project and want to help contribute, please send me over a DM! I’m looking for people passionate about the intersection of Humans and Agent’s working together.

tyllen

350,885 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren