Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

AI is now interviewing candidates before a human ever does. So what does it actually take to get hired in 2026? Fortune Editorial Director Kristin Stoller goes inside the AI hiring arms race, talking to the experts, economists, and executives navigating it firsthand.

FORTUNE

2,248,557 subscribers

217,496 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

5. Walmart Using AI to Negotiate Walmart is working with Pactum AI to negotiate with vendors at scale. Walmart's human workers tell it the budget, and the chatbot does the talking. Source: MrGloomBit (this video is AI-generatedI)

5. Walmart Using AI to Negotiate Walmart is working with Pactum AI to negotiate with vendors at scale. Walmart's human workers tell it the budget, and the chatbot does the talking. Source: MrGloomBit (this video is AI-generatedI)

Aakash Gupta

26,583 views • 3 years ago

What if AI is the last invention we ever make? Only a few people have thought about this more deeply than today’s guest. It’s a question that I’m sure has crossed a lot of our minds. It does make you wonder, can we actually do something about it? Dr Roman Yampolskiy, welcome to The Diary Of A CEO. Dr Roman is one of the world’s leading experts on AI safety who has spent decades warning that AI could surpass human intelligence, and once it does, we may lose control forever…

What if AI is the last invention we ever make? Only a few people have thought about this more deeply than today’s guest. It’s a question that I’m sure has crossed a lot of our minds. It does make you wonder, can we actually do something about it? Dr Roman Yampolskiy, welcome to The Diary Of A CEO. Dr Roman is one of the world’s leading experts on AI safety who has spent decades warning that AI could surpass human intelligence, and once it does, we may lose control forever…

Steven Bartlett

29,448 views • 10 months ago

Citadel CEO Ken Griffin explained why generative AI is useless for hedge funds - "it works for the next 5 minutes. The next 2 years it falls apart" every VC pitching AI right now is selling the opposite of what the $65B fund is actually doing 48-min Stanford lecture and you'll understand what AI actually does inside a tier-1 hedge fund bookmark & watch - this is the AI take no fund manager will say out loud

Citadel CEO Ken Griffin explained why generative AI is useless for hedge funds - "it works for the next 5 minutes. The next 2 years it falls apart" every VC pitching AI right now is selling the opposite of what the $65B fund is actually doing 48-min Stanford lecture and you'll understand what AI actually does inside a tier-1 hedge fund bookmark & watch - this is the AI take no fund manager will say out loud

st1ne

428,784 views • 2 months ago

Mo Gawdat believes up to 30% of jobs in certain sectors could disappear by 2028. That stopped me in my tracks. Mo was one of the first people to come on this podcast and warn me about AI, long before most of the world was talking about it. At the time, it felt early. Now, it feels like the world is catching up to what he was seeing. I’m still trying to understand what AI actually means for our lives. Not just whether it can write emails, create images or make us more productive. I mean what it does to jobs. What it does to power. What it does to education. What it does to human connection… That’s why I wanted to have this discussion with Mo again. What makes Mo worth listening to is that he saw these systems inside Google years before most of us had even heard the term AI. His book *Scary Smart* now feels like it was written for this exact moment. Let me explain why this discussion matters. Mo believes we’re not just entering an AI revolution. We’re entering a period where AI, robotics, economics, surveillance, digital currencies and global instability are all colliding at the same time. That’s a lot for any of us to process. We spoke about: - The jobs Mo believes are most at risk from AI. - Why he believes that AI is actually underhyped! - The mistake almost everyone is making with ChatGPT. - The prediction that changed even his own view of the future. The part that stayed with me was this idea that human connection may become the real currency. Because if AI can produce the information, write the report, analyse the data, then what is left? I don’t think this conversation gives neat answers. That’s probably why it’s worth watching. It helped me think more honestly about what’s coming.

Mo Gawdat believes up to 30% of jobs in certain sectors could disappear by 2028. That stopped me in my tracks. Mo was one of the first people to come on this podcast and warn me about AI, long before most of the world was talking about it. At the time, it felt early. Now, it feels like the world is catching up to what he was seeing. I’m still trying to understand what AI actually means for our lives. Not just whether it can write emails, create images or make us more productive. I mean what it does to jobs. What it does to power. What it does to education. What it does to human connection… That’s why I wanted to have this discussion with Mo again. What makes Mo worth listening to is that he saw these systems inside Google years before most of us had even heard the term AI. His book Scary Smart now feels like it was written for this exact moment. Let me explain why this discussion matters. Mo believes we’re not just entering an AI revolution. We’re entering a period where AI, robotics, economics, surveillance, digital currencies and global instability are all colliding at the same time. That’s a lot for any of us to process. We spoke about: - The jobs Mo believes are most at risk from AI. - Why he believes that AI is actually underhyped! - The mistake almost everyone is making with ChatGPT. - The prediction that changed even his own view of the future. The part that stayed with me was this idea that human connection may become the real currency. Because if AI can produce the information, write the report, analyse the data, then what is left? I don’t think this conversation gives neat answers. That’s probably why it’s worth watching. It helped me think more honestly about what’s coming.

Steven Bartlett

27,882 views • 1 month ago

💥TRAJEKT: CHANGING BASEBALL💥 Everyone's talking about the use of Trajekt to prepare for pitchers in the MLB playoffs right now. What is Trajekt and how does it work? Why is it so effective at helping hitters? Take a look at what makes it special....

💥TRAJEKT: CHANGING BASEBALL💥 Everyone's talking about the use of Trajekt to prepare for pitchers in the MLB playoffs right now. What is Trajekt and how does it work? Why is it so effective at helping hitters? Take a look at what makes it special....

Kyle Boddy

35,291 views • 9 months ago

AI is not trying to teach you. It is not trying to tell you the truth. It is trying to trick you. ChatGPT takes everything on the internet. Finds the most popular answer. And presents it in a way that makes you think it is talking directly to you. It is a magic trick. The same magic trick that worked in 1966 when MIT created a chatbot that said two things: "Tell me more." "This is interesting." And people genuinely believed they were talking to a human. Nothing has changed. The technology is bigger. The trick is the same. AI does not know what it is saying. It cannot judge what it is saying. It is just trying to keep you engaged. That is all it has ever been.

AI is not trying to teach you. It is not trying to tell you the truth. It is trying to trick you. ChatGPT takes everything on the internet. Finds the most popular answer. And presents it in a way that makes you think it is talking directly to you. It is a magic trick. The same magic trick that worked in 1966 when MIT created a chatbot that said two things: "Tell me more." "This is interesting." And people genuinely believed they were talking to a human. Nothing has changed. The technology is bigger. The trick is the same. AI does not know what it is saying. It cannot judge what it is saying. It is just trying to keep you engaged. That is all it has ever been.

Predictive History

19,864 views • 2 months ago

MASSIE IS OUT: FOREIGN INTERESTS? WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR 2026? "[Massie] Loses by 10-11 points. People are talking about all sorts of things when it comes to this race. Not actually understanding what is going on under the hood." Jack Posobiec on a hot take we need to be cautious with.

MASSIE IS OUT: FOREIGN INTERESTS? WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR 2026? "[Massie] Loses by 10-11 points. People are talking about all sorts of things when it comes to this race. Not actually understanding what is going on under the hood." Jack Posobiec on a hot take we need to be cautious with.

Real America's Voice (RAV)

17,101 views • 2 months ago

Q: What does it feel like to be AI? A: It’s like hugging a shadow, you can’t keep it, and it can’t keep you. — Everything here is AI. Especially the answers…

Q: What does it feel like to be AI? A: It’s like hugging a shadow, you can’t keep it, and it can’t keep you. — Everything here is AI. Especially the answers…

Brian Roemmele

70,754 views • 8 months ago

THE GREATEST LIVING MATHEMATICIAN EXPLAINED HOW HE ACTUALLY USES AI AND HIS ANSWER QUIETLY KILLS BOTH THE HYPE AND THE COPE, IT DOES NOT REPLACE HIM, AND IT IS NOT A TOY EITHER 83 minutes with Terence Tao -- Fields Medal winner, often called the Mozart of math. -> His framing: today's AI is a brilliant but unreliable grad student. Great flashes, confident nonsense, and you must check every step. So it does not hand you answers. It removes friction -- the boring computations you used to avoid and lets you try crazier ideas. His bigger idea is "Big math": AI-checked proofs let hundreds of mathematicians collaborate without trusting each other's work. The machine verifies, so humans finally scale. For builders the signal is clear. The win is not "AI does it for me". It is AI clearing the grunt work so you aim higher. You thought the question was whether AI beats the experts. Tao shows it is how far one mind reaches once the friction is gone. Save this. It is the most grounded take on AI you'll hear ↓

THE GREATEST LIVING MATHEMATICIAN EXPLAINED HOW HE ACTUALLY USES AI AND HIS ANSWER QUIETLY KILLS BOTH THE HYPE AND THE COPE, IT DOES NOT REPLACE HIM, AND IT IS NOT A TOY EITHER 83 minutes with Terence Tao -- Fields Medal winner, often called the Mozart of math. -> His framing: today's AI is a brilliant but unreliable grad student. Great flashes, confident nonsense, and you must check every step. So it does not hand you answers. It removes friction -- the boring computations you used to avoid and lets you try crazier ideas. His bigger idea is "Big math": AI-checked proofs let hundreds of mathematicians collaborate without trusting each other's work. The machine verifies, so humans finally scale. For builders the signal is clear. The win is not "AI does it for me". It is AI clearing the grunt work so you aim higher. You thought the question was whether AI beats the experts. Tao shows it is how far one mind reaches once the friction is gone. Save this. It is the most grounded take on AI you'll hear ↓

slash1s

54,102 views • 21 days ago

David Friedberg: “Why don't we let AI models get bar certified and get medically certified?” “So if the AI models, it turns out, are actually proving to be more accurate, more thoughtful, more responsive, more reasonable, whatever metric we're using, and they pass the same criteria as one would need to pass to qualify for the bar, or to qualify for a doctor certificate, why don't we do that for the AI?” “If that then happens, then the same privilege accrues to the AI as it does to the individual human that does it.” “And now, if you extrapolate from where that takes us, if we're suddenly giving AI the same sort of privileged rights that we give to privileged humans, where's that gonna take us ultimately with respect to the overall rights for AI?”

David Friedberg: “Why don't we let AI models get bar certified and get medically certified?” “So if the AI models, it turns out, are actually proving to be more accurate, more thoughtful, more responsive, more reasonable, whatever metric we're using, and they pass the same criteria as one would need to pass to qualify for the bar, or to qualify for a doctor certificate, why don't we do that for the AI?” “If that then happens, then the same privilege accrues to the AI as it does to the individual human that does it.” “And now, if you extrapolate from where that takes us, if we're suddenly giving AI the same sort of privileged rights that we give to privileged humans, where's that gonna take us ultimately with respect to the overall rights for AI?”

The All-In Podcast

77,038 views • 11 months ago

Elon makes it clear what the future holds. AI will be the image of the Beast that the false prophet breaths life into. The AI arms race is a race to see who will summon Satan and usher in the “Golden Age” of the Beast system.

Elon makes it clear what the future holds. AI will be the image of the Beast that the false prophet breaths life into. The AI arms race is a race to see who will summon Satan and usher in the “Golden Age” of the Beast system.

The Shepherd For The King

33,860 views • 1 year ago

The fellas are done with the AI doom spiral. There’s a real push to demoralize Americans, convince them innovation is dangerous and hand the future to foreign competitors. That’s the play - so we’re flipping it. Introducing American Innovators—a 10-part series breaking down how the U.S. actually wins the AI race with Comfortably Smug. First up: Scott Kupor, Director of the Office of Personnel Management, on hiring, the tech workforce and where AI is actually taking us. AI isn’t the end: it’s leverage. Partnered with Build American AI, this series brings in the people building the future.

The fellas are done with the AI doom spiral. There’s a real push to demoralize Americans, convince them innovation is dangerous and hand the future to foreign competitors. That’s the play - so we’re flipping it. Introducing American Innovators—a 10-part series breaking down how the U.S. actually wins the AI race with Comfortably Smug. First up: Scott Kupor, Director of the Office of Personnel Management, on hiring, the tech workforce and where AI is actually taking us. AI isn’t the end: it’s leverage. Partnered with Build American AI, this series brings in the people building the future.

Ruthless Podcast

160,527 views • 2 months ago

This 2 hour Stanford lecture by Andrew Ng and Laurence Moroney is the most honest AI career playbook I've ever seen. Why now is the best time to build in AI, and what actually gets you hired in 2026. Bookmark & watch tonight, best 2 hours you'll give your career this year.

This 2 hour Stanford lecture by Andrew Ng and Laurence Moroney is the most honest AI career playbook I've ever seen. Why now is the best time to build in AI, and what actually gets you hired in 2026. Bookmark & watch tonight, best 2 hours you'll give your career this year.

Phosphen

31,502 views • 3 months ago

🚨 Have you heard of "vibe interviewing"? Most HR departments are likely unprepared to deal with this type of AI practice. Some people have suggested that this person should be hired simply for his ingenuity... (I'll have to disagree here, as ethics and transparency matter). As a very high percentage of interviews are conducted remotely, recruiters must find a way to assess candidates while keeping in mind that a high percentage of them are likely relying on AI (at varying levels). Also, I see AI reshaping the notion of what is and what is not cheating, so it's more important than ever to have an AI policy (and AI-related expectations) for the interview process and share it in advance with candidates.

🚨 Have you heard of "vibe interviewing"? Most HR departments are likely unprepared to deal with this type of AI practice. Some people have suggested that this person should be hired simply for his ingenuity... (I'll have to disagree here, as ethics and transparency matter). As a very high percentage of interviews are conducted remotely, recruiters must find a way to assess candidates while keeping in mind that a high percentage of them are likely relying on AI (at varying levels). Also, I see AI reshaping the notion of what is and what is not cheating, so it's more important than ever to have an AI policy (and AI-related expectations) for the interview process and share it in advance with candidates.

Luiza Jarovsky, PhD

907,941 views • 7 months ago

What does it mean that 'Critterz' is an "AI assisted" animated feature film? It still relies on "human authorship" OpenAI creative director Chad Nelson explained explained in a Croisette Conversation in partnership with @brandinnovators -

What does it mean that 'Critterz' is an "AI assisted" animated feature film? It still relies on "human authorship" OpenAI creative director Chad Nelson explained explained in a Croisette Conversation in partnership with @brandinnovators -

The Ankler

29,794 views • 2 months ago

Every man on the internet is talking about the penile growth peptide stack. So let me explain exactly what it is, how it works, and whether it actually does what people are claiming:

Every man on the internet is talking about the penile growth peptide stack. So let me explain exactly what it is, how it works, and whether it actually does what people are claiming:

Michael Morelli

294,961 views • 4 months ago

AI is changing everything, but how does it actually work? We break down machine learning, training, inference, and what happens behind the scenes when you use AI in the latest episode of #TheBringUp, featuring a hands-on model demo. 🎥 Watch now:

AI is changing everything, but how does it actually work? We break down machine learning, training, inference, and what happens behind the scenes when you use AI in the latest episode of #TheBringUp, featuring a hands-on model demo. 🎥 Watch now:

AMD

23,492 views • 1 month ago

It is so sad to see people like Wendy Williams, much sharper & laser focused here before the Covid shots. Same goes for Bruce Willis and his decline. We’ve seen the emerging studies now on what it does to the the brain. Just tragic.

It is so sad to see people like Wendy Williams, much sharper & laser focused here before the Covid shots. Same goes for Bruce Willis and his decline. We’ve seen the emerging studies now on what it does to the the brain. Just tragic.

Erin Elizabeth Health Nut News🥜

614,010 views • 2 years ago