正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🚨 Ajit Doval Under Nuclear Scrutiny 🔍⚛️ In a high-stakes fallout 📞 telephone between India's NSA Ajit Doval and IAEA Deputy Director Massimo Aparo, serious alarms have been raised over India’s repeated nuclear safety breaches. 💣 Aparo reportedly confronted Doval with classified assessments of safety lapses at Indian nuclear...

ConflictWatchX's profile picture

Conflict Watch

7,227 subscribers

17,190 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术新闻政治教育
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

marukhmalik 的头像
marukhmalik1 年前

A country that cannot safeguard its nuclear assets how can it be a guarantor of global peace

Noor Fatima 的头像
Noor Fatima1 年前

The world should not ignore repeated safety violations by India.IAEA should take strict action if India continues to break the rules.IndiaNuclearLeak #AjitDoval #IAEA #MassimoAparo #GlobalSecurity #NuclearAccountability #Exposed #SanctionsAhead

rabia 的头像
rabia1 年前

If international bodies remain silent the global principles of nuclear safety will become a mockery #AjitDevol #ModiDisaster

Hoor Zahra 的头像
Hoor Zahra1 年前

India’s growing nuclear arsenal and weak safeguards are dangerous. Its refusal to join the NPT shows irresponsibility. This puts global security at risk. #IndiaNuclearLeak #AjitDoval #IAEA #MassimoAparo #GlobalSecurity #NuclearAccountability #Exposed #SanctionsAhead #الهلال

guluna 的头像
guluna1 年前

if they can't maintain the safety of properly,they have no right to be a nuclear country its alarming no need to put a global security in danger #IndiaNuclearLeak #AjitDoval #IAEA #MassimoAparo #GlobalSecurity #NuclearAccountability #Exposed #SanctionsAhead #الهلال_مانشستر_سيتي

Aarohi Sharma 的头像
Aarohi Sharma1 年前

This is very serious if India can not handle nuclear facilities safely the world must take action #เที่ยวไทยคนละครึ่ง #หวยงวดนี้

Adnan saqi 的头像
Adnan saqi1 年前

IAEA warning prove that India is not a trustworthy nuclear power at all 😃#deprem

Afsha Awan 的头像
Afsha Awan1 年前

The same actions the same tactics conspiring against Pakistan spreading lies about Pakistan and continuing the same behavior despite being humiliated everywhere#IndiaNuclearLeak #AjitDoval #IAEA #MassimoAparo #GlobalSecurity #NuclearAccountability #Exposed #SanctionsAhead #الهلال

Saboor Ahmed 的头像
Saboor Ahmed1 年前

India cannot control its nuclear program, the world needs to take action against them.

Anmol Qasim 的头像
Anmol Qasim1 年前

Nuclear safety ke mamalat mein India ka record khud hi uske khilaf bol raha hai India ki asliyat duniya ke samne aa gayi

相关视频

SHANTI BILL : Why India’s Nuclear Overhaul Is Rattling Islamabad India’s SHANTI Bill marks one of the most significant overhauls of the country’s nuclear framework in decades, signalling a strategic shift with regional and global consequences. Tabled in Parliament, the legislation seeks to repeal outdated nuclear laws, introduce clearer safeguards, cap liability, and bring greater transparency to India’s atomic sector. The goal is straightforward: unlock private investment, attract global partners, and modernise India’s nuclear energy ecosystem. As New Delhi moves to open its nuclear sector under internationally accepted norms, the response from across the border has been sharp. Pakistan has reacted with criticism and warnings, despite its own history being marred by nuclear opacity, proliferation scandals, and repeated episodes of nuclear brinkmanship. The contrast between India’s reform-driven approach and Pakistan’s record has not gone unnoticed by global observers. With private capital entering India’s nuclear future and international cooperation gaining momentum, the SHANTI Bill redraws the strategic map of South Asia. It underscores India’s bid to position itself as a responsible nuclear power aligned with global standards, even as regional tensions resurface. Credit : India Today Global.
3:40

SHANTI BILL : Why India’s Nuclear Overhaul Is Rattling Islamabad India’s SHANTI Bill marks one of the most significant overhauls of the country’s nuclear framework in decades, signalling a strategic shift with regional and global consequences. Tabled in Parliament, the legislation seeks to repeal outdated nuclear laws, introduce clearer safeguards, cap liability, and bring greater transparency to India’s atomic sector. The goal is straightforward: unlock private investment, attract global partners, and modernise India’s nuclear energy ecosystem. As New Delhi moves to open its nuclear sector under internationally accepted norms, the response from across the border has been sharp. Pakistan has reacted with criticism and warnings, despite its own history being marred by nuclear opacity, proliferation scandals, and repeated episodes of nuclear brinkmanship. The contrast between India’s reform-driven approach and Pakistan’s record has not gone unnoticed by global observers. With private capital entering India’s nuclear future and international cooperation gaining momentum, the SHANTI Bill redraws the strategic map of South Asia. It underscores India’s bid to position itself as a responsible nuclear power aligned with global standards, even as regional tensions resurface. Credit : India Today Global.

Augadh

16,449 次观看 • 7 个月前

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported a grave and unequivocal report on Iran’s nuclear program on Saturday. The agency presents a stark picture that serves as a clear warning sign: despite countless warnings by the international community, Iran is totally determined to complete its nuclear weapons program. The report strongly reinforces what Israel has been saying for years — the purpose of Iran’s nuclear program is not peaceful. This is evident from the alarming scope of Iran’s uranium enrichment activity. Such a level of enrichment exists only in countries actively pursuing nuclear weapons and has no civilian justification whatsoever. The report clearly indicates that Iran remains in non-compliance of its fundamental commitments and obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), and continues to withhold cooperation from IAEA inspectors. The international community must act now to stop Iran. See my comments at today’s international media briefing.
1:17

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported a grave and unequivocal report on Iran’s nuclear program on Saturday. The agency presents a stark picture that serves as a clear warning sign: despite countless warnings by the international community, Iran is totally determined to complete its nuclear weapons program. The report strongly reinforces what Israel has been saying for years — the purpose of Iran’s nuclear program is not peaceful. This is evident from the alarming scope of Iran’s uranium enrichment activity. Such a level of enrichment exists only in countries actively pursuing nuclear weapons and has no civilian justification whatsoever. The report clearly indicates that Iran remains in non-compliance of its fundamental commitments and obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), and continues to withhold cooperation from IAEA inspectors. The international community must act now to stop Iran. See my comments at today’s international media briefing.

Sharren Haskel השכל שרן

20,982 次观看 • 1 年前

‼️ This is a very dangerous situation. Nothing like this has ever happened before. This nuclear power plant is the largest in Europe. Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, which has been under Russian occupation since March 2022, has been disconnected from the power supply for more than a week. IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi stressed that this situation is unstable in terms of nuclear safety, since "in case of a complete blackout with no off-site power and no EDGs operating, the nuclear fuel could melt if power could not be restored in time." According to Ukraine’s state nuclear operator Energoatom, this is already the tenth blackout at the occupied Zaporizhzhia plant. At present, the plant is running on diesel generators. "Russia is doing absolutely nothing to fix the situation or to allow Ukrainian specialists to restore external power to the plant, which under normal conditions should operate without interruption. Russia is deliberately creating the threat of radiation incidents, taking advantage, unfortunately, of the weak position of the IAEA and its Director General Rafael Grossi, as well as the distraction of global attention. To resolve the situation, weak and half-measures will not work. What is needed is strong action and corresponding pressure on Russia to protect lives," President Zelenskyy said. Moreover, yesterday’s targeted Russian strike on one of Ukraine’s power substations in Slavutych caused a blackout lasting more than three hours at facilities of the former Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. "This includes, in particular, the New Safe Confinement that protects the environment from the remains of the plant’s fourth reactor after the 1986 explosion, as well as radioactive debris and dust. It also includes the spent nuclear fuel storage facility, which holds 80% of all the spent fuel accumulated during the plant’s operation - a total of more than 3,250 tons of spent fuel assemblies. The Russians could not have been unaware that a strike on facilities in Slavutych would have such consequences for Chernobyl. This was a deliberate attack, in which Russia used more than 20 drones. Some of them were shot down, but the strike was deliberately organized in a wave of drones to make defending the site more difficult," the President of Ukraine said.
0:55

‼️ This is a very dangerous situation. Nothing like this has ever happened before. This nuclear power plant is the largest in Europe. Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, which has been under Russian occupation since March 2022, has been disconnected from the power supply for more than a week. IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi stressed that this situation is unstable in terms of nuclear safety, since "in case of a complete blackout with no off-site power and no EDGs operating, the nuclear fuel could melt if power could not be restored in time." According to Ukraine’s state nuclear operator Energoatom, this is already the tenth blackout at the occupied Zaporizhzhia plant. At present, the plant is running on diesel generators. "Russia is doing absolutely nothing to fix the situation or to allow Ukrainian specialists to restore external power to the plant, which under normal conditions should operate without interruption. Russia is deliberately creating the threat of radiation incidents, taking advantage, unfortunately, of the weak position of the IAEA and its Director General Rafael Grossi, as well as the distraction of global attention. To resolve the situation, weak and half-measures will not work. What is needed is strong action and corresponding pressure on Russia to protect lives," President Zelenskyy said. Moreover, yesterday’s targeted Russian strike on one of Ukraine’s power substations in Slavutych caused a blackout lasting more than three hours at facilities of the former Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. "This includes, in particular, the New Safe Confinement that protects the environment from the remains of the plant’s fourth reactor after the 1986 explosion, as well as radioactive debris and dust. It also includes the spent nuclear fuel storage facility, which holds 80% of all the spent fuel accumulated during the plant’s operation - a total of more than 3,250 tons of spent fuel assemblies. The Russians could not have been unaware that a strike on facilities in Slavutych would have such consequences for Chernobyl. This was a deliberate attack, in which Russia used more than 20 drones. Some of them were shot down, but the strike was deliberately organized in a wave of drones to make defending the site more difficult," the President of Ukraine said.

Anton Gerashchenko

256,668 次观看 • 9 个月前

‼️🇷🇺🇮🇷"A strike on the Bushehr nuclear power plant could lead to a Chernobyl-scale disaster" — Likhachev ▪️According to the head of Rosatom, Russia is in solidarity with the IAEA and other members of the global nuclear community: weapons should not be brought close to operating nuclear facilities. ➖"I hope that the Israeli leadership will have enough common sense to prevent even an accidental strike on the Bushehr nuclear power plant," he emphasized. ▪️Russia is close to introducing a state of emergency and a complete evacuation, primarily of women and children. The specialists who were on a business trip have already been removed from the risk zone. ▪️The CEO of the state corporation said that Russia is ready to take on work with enriched uranium in Iran, including highly enriched uranium, if there are international agreements. ▪️Likhachev also noted: the conflicts in Donbass and Zaporozhye showed how vulnerable nuclear energy is in military conditions. ▪️He added that Russia is cautious near Ukrainian nuclear power plants, unlike Kyiv. ➖ “They are flying at the Kursk NPP, but there have been no mirror strikes on Ukrainian stations,” he added. - RVvoenkor
1:47

‼️🇷🇺🇮🇷"A strike on the Bushehr nuclear power plant could lead to a Chernobyl-scale disaster" — Likhachev ▪️According to the head of Rosatom, Russia is in solidarity with the IAEA and other members of the global nuclear community: weapons should not be brought close to operating nuclear facilities. ➖"I hope that the Israeli leadership will have enough common sense to prevent even an accidental strike on the Bushehr nuclear power plant," he emphasized. ▪️Russia is close to introducing a state of emergency and a complete evacuation, primarily of women and children. The specialists who were on a business trip have already been removed from the risk zone. ▪️The CEO of the state corporation said that Russia is ready to take on work with enriched uranium in Iran, including highly enriched uranium, if there are international agreements. ▪️Likhachev also noted: the conflicts in Donbass and Zaporozhye showed how vulnerable nuclear energy is in military conditions. ▪️He added that Russia is cautious near Ukrainian nuclear power plants, unlike Kyiv. ➖ “They are flying at the Kursk NPP, but there have been no mirror strikes on Ukrainian stations,” he added. - RVvoenkor

Zlatti71

20,050 次观看 • 1 年前

𝐖𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐔𝐩, 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚! 𝐁𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐓𝐨𝐨 𝐋𝐚𝐭𝐞 🚨 Atomic Energy in the Hands of Adani❗A Threat to National and International Security 🚨 Under #PMModi's leadership, the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) is reportedly paving the way for #GautamAdani — a Private Businessman & #Modi's Friend with no proven expertise in this sensitive field—to enter India's Nuclear Energy Sector. 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐭 𝐑𝐢𝐬𝐤 Nuclear energy is a strategic domain, traditionally reserved for state control due to its potential for misuse. Handing it to a private player with alleged ties to foreign entities (like China) opens the door to sabotage, espionage, and loss of sovereign control. 𝐈𝐧𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐇𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬 Adani's empire is built on coal and infrastructure, not nuclear science. Entrusting him with a ₹44,000 crore nuclear venture risks catastrophic mismanagement—think safety failures or even accidental disasters. 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐬 A private entity with questionable transparency managing nuclear assets could destabilize global trust. India’s nuclear credibility, hard-earned as a responsible power, could crumble, alarming neighbors and allies alike. 𝐂𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐲𝐢𝐬𝐦 𝐎𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐲 Modi’s pattern of favoring Adani—seen in projects like the Gujarat energy park near Pakistan’s border—shows profit trumping security. This isn’t governance; it’s a betrayal of India’s future. Wake Up, India! 𝐎𝐮𝐫 𝐍𝐮𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐀𝐫𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐄𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐲 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐨𝐨 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞 𝐠𝐚𝐦𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐲. Thanks Ashok Kumar Pandey अशोक اشوک & Raju Parulekar Sir to bring this issue to the fore. #MadhabiPuriBuch #CG_की_प्रGATI_का_बजट #WorldWildlifeDay #Oscars
6:20

𝐖𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐔𝐩, 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚! 𝐁𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐓𝐨𝐨 𝐋𝐚𝐭𝐞 🚨 Atomic Energy in the Hands of Adani❗A Threat to National and International Security 🚨 Under #PMModi's leadership, the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) is reportedly paving the way for #GautamAdani — a Private Businessman & #Modi's Friend with no proven expertise in this sensitive field—to enter India's Nuclear Energy Sector. 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐭 𝐑𝐢𝐬𝐤 Nuclear energy is a strategic domain, traditionally reserved for state control due to its potential for misuse. Handing it to a private player with alleged ties to foreign entities (like China) opens the door to sabotage, espionage, and loss of sovereign control. 𝐈𝐧𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐇𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬 Adani's empire is built on coal and infrastructure, not nuclear science. Entrusting him with a ₹44,000 crore nuclear venture risks catastrophic mismanagement—think safety failures or even accidental disasters. 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐬 A private entity with questionable transparency managing nuclear assets could destabilize global trust. India’s nuclear credibility, hard-earned as a responsible power, could crumble, alarming neighbors and allies alike. 𝐂𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐲𝐢𝐬𝐦 𝐎𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐲 Modi’s pattern of favoring Adani—seen in projects like the Gujarat energy park near Pakistan’s border—shows profit trumping security. This isn’t governance; it’s a betrayal of India’s future. Wake Up, India! 𝐎𝐮𝐫 𝐍𝐮𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐀𝐫𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐄𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐲 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐨𝐨 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞 𝐠𝐚𝐦𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐲. Thanks Ashok Kumar Pandey अशोक اشوک & Raju Parulekar Sir to bring this issue to the fore. #MadhabiPuriBuch #CG_की_प्रGATI_का_बजट #WorldWildlifeDay #Oscars

তন্ময় l T͞anmoy l

38,383 次观看 • 1 年前

☢️Trump will WALK AWAY from Iran War…but can Middle East nuclear proliferation be STOPPED? Afshin Rattansi: ‘How can the world disarm Israel of nuclear weapons then?’ Former Israeli Acting President Abraham Burg: ‘It’s not about disarming Israel, it’s about the entire region.’ Afshin: ‘Well, no one else has nuclear weapons, it’s just Israel that has them in this region. How can the world disarm them?’ Burg: ‘What started now does not end with this two-week ceasefire. There are so many genies out of the bottle now. And the motivation for nuclear power without America, because America under Trump will walk away like it ran away from so many other conflicts around the world in the last 20-some years, people will be motivated to have nuclear weapons. So there should be both a regional setting and global pressure to disable anybody who has nuclear capability, war nuclear capability, not to have it. Whatever guarantees are given to Iran, to the Saudis, to the Israelis, those guarantees should be very, very solid, very, very strong. But with one bottom line: the Middle East clean and clear of weapons of mass destruction. Can we have nuclear capabilities and nuclear reactors for energy? Yes. Should these nuclear energy centres be run together by Israelis and Saudis and Iranians and Egyptians and Emiratis? The answer is yes. The more cooperation we have on peacetime nuclear capability, the less threat we have with the warheads.’ Watch the full interview with Avraham Burg below in the replies👇
1:37

☢️Trump will WALK AWAY from Iran War…but can Middle East nuclear proliferation be STOPPED? Afshin Rattansi: ‘How can the world disarm Israel of nuclear weapons then?’ Former Israeli Acting President Abraham Burg: ‘It’s not about disarming Israel, it’s about the entire region.’ Afshin: ‘Well, no one else has nuclear weapons, it’s just Israel that has them in this region. How can the world disarm them?’ Burg: ‘What started now does not end with this two-week ceasefire. There are so many genies out of the bottle now. And the motivation for nuclear power without America, because America under Trump will walk away like it ran away from so many other conflicts around the world in the last 20-some years, people will be motivated to have nuclear weapons. So there should be both a regional setting and global pressure to disable anybody who has nuclear capability, war nuclear capability, not to have it. Whatever guarantees are given to Iran, to the Saudis, to the Israelis, those guarantees should be very, very solid, very, very strong. But with one bottom line: the Middle East clean and clear of weapons of mass destruction. Can we have nuclear capabilities and nuclear reactors for energy? Yes. Should these nuclear energy centres be run together by Israelis and Saudis and Iranians and Egyptians and Emiratis? The answer is yes. The more cooperation we have on peacetime nuclear capability, the less threat we have with the warheads.’ Watch the full interview with Avraham Burg below in the replies👇

Going Underground

29,572 次观看 • 3 个月前

Dammmmn.. 🔥🔥 🚨 Matt Gaetz calls out the Israeli Government’s Hypocrisy over Secret Nuclear Facilities “If the world is interested in a secret nuclear program in the Middle East, there is a country that won’t allow any international Inspectors. ISRAEL… Israel has a nuclear weapon. And They don’t allow any inspections.” 🔴 DIMONA NUCLEAR PROJECT… What Matt is referring strikes at the very heart at why President JFK was assassinated. The Israeli Dimona nuclear project refers to the construction and operation of the Shimon Peres Negev Nuclear Research Center, commonly known as the Dimona reactor, located in the Negev desert near the city of Dimona. Construction of the Dimona facility began in 1958 with significant assistance from France. The reactor became operational between 1962 and 1964. The project was kept highly secretive, and Israel officially maintains a policy of "nuclear ambiguity," neither confirming nor denying the possession of nuclear weapons. (YES, they have them.) • “Officially”, the facility is for nuclear research, but it has been widely reported to be a key part of Israel's nuclear weapons program. —— The heavy-water nuclear reactor is believed to produce plutonium for nuclear weapons, and there are facilities for reprocessing spent fuel rods to extract plutonium. • Israel DOES NOT allow inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) at Dimona, except that time in 1965. —— declassified documents emerged showing Israel used tactics like installing temporary false walls, or even creating a "fake control room," to mislead US inspectors about the facility's true purpose after JFK kept applying pressure.. 🔴 PROBABLE CAUSE ISRAEL WAS INVOLVED WITH THE DEATH OF JFK When the JFK Files were declassified, I found one of the most stunning admissions to date. Not one reputable news agency reported on it. Why? Mr Angleton, “at that meeting did he raise with you the subject of Atomic technology from the CIA to Israel?” Angleton: “Yes” These documents came from the heavily redacted Church Committee Testimony of James Angleton — showing the CIA’s Secret Role in Atomic Weapons Transfer, Arming Israel with Nuclear Technology Against JFK's Wishes • The unredacted files reveal that Mr. Angleton (CIA), confirms that atomic technology and/or knowledge was transferred to Israel against the wishes of JFK. This provided a clear motive.. and being that it was so heavily redacted, it may be more than just a motive. JFK did not want Israel to have nuclear weapons and took significant steps to prevent it, including diplomatic pressure, demands for inspections, and warnings about the consequences for U.S.-Israel relations. Details of the Transfer: • The unredacted portions (yellow) disclose that the transfer involved not just technology but also knowledge of atomic matters, facilitated through intermediaries (Blue), like scientists (e.g., a Dr. Wilfred) and possibly journalists (e.g., Tad Szulc). Angleton admits to having met with Israeli scientists and officials, including Ben Wells, and discusses the involvement of PLUTONIUM, a key material in nuclear weapons development. • Israeli Nuclear Program: The files indicate that Israel had acquired plutonium for its nuclear program, which aligns with historical knowledge of Israel’s development of nuclear capabilities, particularly through its Dimona reactor. • Angleton expressed concern about the implications of this transfer, noting that it was done clandestinely and that the U.S. government (or at least some parts of it) might NOT have been fully informed. He mentions the need to keep the matter secret and the potential fallout “if it ever became public knowledge”
3:12

Dammmmn.. 🔥🔥 🚨 Matt Gaetz calls out the Israeli Government’s Hypocrisy over Secret Nuclear Facilities “If the world is interested in a secret nuclear program in the Middle East, there is a country that won’t allow any international Inspectors. ISRAEL… Israel has a nuclear weapon. And They don’t allow any inspections.” 🔴 DIMONA NUCLEAR PROJECT… What Matt is referring strikes at the very heart at why President JFK was assassinated. The Israeli Dimona nuclear project refers to the construction and operation of the Shimon Peres Negev Nuclear Research Center, commonly known as the Dimona reactor, located in the Negev desert near the city of Dimona. Construction of the Dimona facility began in 1958 with significant assistance from France. The reactor became operational between 1962 and 1964. The project was kept highly secretive, and Israel officially maintains a policy of "nuclear ambiguity," neither confirming nor denying the possession of nuclear weapons. (YES, they have them.) • “Officially”, the facility is for nuclear research, but it has been widely reported to be a key part of Israel's nuclear weapons program. —— The heavy-water nuclear reactor is believed to produce plutonium for nuclear weapons, and there are facilities for reprocessing spent fuel rods to extract plutonium. • Israel DOES NOT allow inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) at Dimona, except that time in 1965. —— declassified documents emerged showing Israel used tactics like installing temporary false walls, or even creating a "fake control room," to mislead US inspectors about the facility's true purpose after JFK kept applying pressure.. 🔴 PROBABLE CAUSE ISRAEL WAS INVOLVED WITH THE DEATH OF JFK When the JFK Files were declassified, I found one of the most stunning admissions to date. Not one reputable news agency reported on it. Why? Mr Angleton, “at that meeting did he raise with you the subject of Atomic technology from the CIA to Israel?” Angleton: “Yes” These documents came from the heavily redacted Church Committee Testimony of James Angleton — showing the CIA’s Secret Role in Atomic Weapons Transfer, Arming Israel with Nuclear Technology Against JFK's Wishes • The unredacted files reveal that Mr. Angleton (CIA), confirms that atomic technology and/or knowledge was transferred to Israel against the wishes of JFK. This provided a clear motive.. and being that it was so heavily redacted, it may be more than just a motive. JFK did not want Israel to have nuclear weapons and took significant steps to prevent it, including diplomatic pressure, demands for inspections, and warnings about the consequences for U.S.-Israel relations. Details of the Transfer: • The unredacted portions (yellow) disclose that the transfer involved not just technology but also knowledge of atomic matters, facilitated through intermediaries (Blue), like scientists (e.g., a Dr. Wilfred) and possibly journalists (e.g., Tad Szulc). Angleton admits to having met with Israeli scientists and officials, including Ben Wells, and discusses the involvement of PLUTONIUM, a key material in nuclear weapons development. • Israeli Nuclear Program: The files indicate that Israel had acquired plutonium for its nuclear program, which aligns with historical knowledge of Israel’s development of nuclear capabilities, particularly through its Dimona reactor. • Angleton expressed concern about the implications of this transfer, noting that it was done clandestinely and that the U.S. government (or at least some parts of it) might NOT have been fully informed. He mentions the need to keep the matter secret and the potential fallout “if it ever became public knowledge”

MJTruthUltra

63,726 次观看 • 1 年前

🇮🇷 Changing Iran's nuclear doctrine in the event of an attack on peaceful nuclear centers 🇮🇷 The Commander of the Security and Safety Corps of the country's nuclear centers said: "The country's nuclear centers are completely safe. The threat of the Zionist regime to Iran's nuclear centers makes it possible to revise and deviate from the declared nuclear policy and considerations." 🇮🇷 Emphasizing the complete security of the country's nuclear centers in response to the threat of the Zionist regime to attack these centers, General Ahmad Haq-Talab said: “A revision of the doctrine and nuclear policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran and a deviation from the previously announced declaration is possible and is being discussed.” 🇮🇷 According to public relations information for the entire IRGC, the Commander of the Nuclear Defense and Security Corps, Brigadier General Ahmad Haq-Talab, said in a conversation about the possible actions of the Zionist regime in response to the victorious Operation True Promise to attack the country's nuclear facilities: “These threats do not apply either to today or to yesterday, since in previous years the false Zionist regime, in addition to threats, undertook sabotage and terrorist actions in the country’s nuclear industry.” 🇮🇷 He added: “Although all countries are prohibited from attacking nuclear facilities in accordance with international protocols and standards, as well as the rules and regulations of the International Nuclear Agency, the Islamic Republic of Iran has always been ready to counter these threats from the very beginning.” General Haq-Talab, noting that the Zionist regime recently violated all international laws and regulations by committing a criminal act by attacking the consular section of the Embassy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Syria, stated: “By the grace of God, thanks to the measures of the Supreme Leader and Commander-in-Chief, as well as the efforts of the children of the Iranian nation in the armed forces, using passive defense plans, as well as the most modern means and equipment, as well as thanks to the dispersal of our country’s nuclear facilities and complexes over the vast territory of Iran, We can deal with any threat from the Zionist regime." 🇮🇷 The commander of the security and safety corps of the country's nuclear centers, emphasizing that the armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran are in full readiness, noted: "The nuclear centers of the Zionist enemy have been identified and the necessary information about all targets is at our disposal, so to speak, to respond to possible actions. They hold the trigger in their hands to launch powerful missiles to destroy the specified targets." 🇮🇷 He said: “If the Zionist regime wants to take action against our nuclear facilities and centers, it will definitely face our reaction and the regime’s nuclear facilities will be attacked using advanced weapons.” 🇮🇷 He further emphasized: “If the fake Zionist regime wants to use the threat of an attack on our country’s nuclear centers as a tool of pressure on Iran, then a revision of the nuclear doctrine and policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran and a retreat from the previous declaration are possible and discussed.” 🇮🇷 General Haq-Talab, emphasizing that the order of the Supreme Leader must be carried out today without delay, said: “If the Zionist regime commits an act of aggression against Iran, the type of response will be planned by the armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and they must be confident that the blow they receive from the armed forces will be remembered in history, like Operation True Promise.” ."
4:56

🇮🇷 Changing Iran's nuclear doctrine in the event of an attack on peaceful nuclear centers 🇮🇷 The Commander of the Security and Safety Corps of the country's nuclear centers said: "The country's nuclear centers are completely safe. The threat of the Zionist regime to Iran's nuclear centers makes it possible to revise and deviate from the declared nuclear policy and considerations." 🇮🇷 Emphasizing the complete security of the country's nuclear centers in response to the threat of the Zionist regime to attack these centers, General Ahmad Haq-Talab said: “A revision of the doctrine and nuclear policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran and a deviation from the previously announced declaration is possible and is being discussed.” 🇮🇷 According to public relations information for the entire IRGC, the Commander of the Nuclear Defense and Security Corps, Brigadier General Ahmad Haq-Talab, said in a conversation about the possible actions of the Zionist regime in response to the victorious Operation True Promise to attack the country's nuclear facilities: “These threats do not apply either to today or to yesterday, since in previous years the false Zionist regime, in addition to threats, undertook sabotage and terrorist actions in the country’s nuclear industry.” 🇮🇷 He added: “Although all countries are prohibited from attacking nuclear facilities in accordance with international protocols and standards, as well as the rules and regulations of the International Nuclear Agency, the Islamic Republic of Iran has always been ready to counter these threats from the very beginning.” General Haq-Talab, noting that the Zionist regime recently violated all international laws and regulations by committing a criminal act by attacking the consular section of the Embassy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Syria, stated: “By the grace of God, thanks to the measures of the Supreme Leader and Commander-in-Chief, as well as the efforts of the children of the Iranian nation in the armed forces, using passive defense plans, as well as the most modern means and equipment, as well as thanks to the dispersal of our country’s nuclear facilities and complexes over the vast territory of Iran, We can deal with any threat from the Zionist regime." 🇮🇷 The commander of the security and safety corps of the country's nuclear centers, emphasizing that the armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran are in full readiness, noted: "The nuclear centers of the Zionist enemy have been identified and the necessary information about all targets is at our disposal, so to speak, to respond to possible actions. They hold the trigger in their hands to launch powerful missiles to destroy the specified targets." 🇮🇷 He said: “If the Zionist regime wants to take action against our nuclear facilities and centers, it will definitely face our reaction and the regime’s nuclear facilities will be attacked using advanced weapons.” 🇮🇷 He further emphasized: “If the fake Zionist regime wants to use the threat of an attack on our country’s nuclear centers as a tool of pressure on Iran, then a revision of the nuclear doctrine and policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran and a retreat from the previous declaration are possible and discussed.” 🇮🇷 General Haq-Talab, emphasizing that the order of the Supreme Leader must be carried out today without delay, said: “If the Zionist regime commits an act of aggression against Iran, the type of response will be planned by the armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and they must be confident that the blow they receive from the armed forces will be remembered in history, like Operation True Promise.” ."

𝕊𝕡𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕻𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕤

37,377 次观看 • 2 年前

Today, the #Belarus regime has signed an agreement with Russia on the deployment of nuclear weapons. It would not only endanger the lives of Belarusians but also create a new threat against Ukraine & all of Europe. Even when they are talking about tactical nuclear weapons, most of them are still as powerful as the atomic bomb that killed 140,000 people in Hiroshima. The radioactive fallout would be much worse than the contamination that Belarusians experienced after the 1986 Chornobyl disaster. Last week, as G7 leaders gathered in Hiroshima, I urged the world to take action against this dangerous escalation. If we don’t react, then other dictators with nuclear ambitions will feel encouraged to raise the stakes. We can’t play this game, because there is only one outcome; nuclear devastation. Since the beginning of the Russian full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Putin has used his nuclear arsenal to intimidate the world. As the Russian army has proven ineffective, he is playing the last card that he has. But these threats didn’t stop the democratic world from supporting Ukraine in the fight for freedom. And we can’t let this latest piece of nuclear blackmail stop us. The deployment of any kind of nuclear weapons in Belarus is not only a violation of international commitments such as the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and the Budapest Memorandum of 1994. It also violates our non-nuclear status under the Constitution & the will of the Belarusian people. It will make Belarusians hostages to Russian imperial ambitions. It is not too late, but time is running out. I ask our partners & allies to take firm steps to prevent the deployment of nuclear weapons in Belarus. I ask you to consider preventive sanctions on Russia & Lukashenka’s regime. They must know that if the deployment happens – the dictators will face devastating consequences. Belarusians deserve to live in a free, democratic & safe country. We all deserve to live in a free & safe Europe. Let’s make this come true.
2:34

Today, the #Belarus regime has signed an agreement with Russia on the deployment of nuclear weapons. It would not only endanger the lives of Belarusians but also create a new threat against Ukraine & all of Europe. Even when they are talking about tactical nuclear weapons, most of them are still as powerful as the atomic bomb that killed 140,000 people in Hiroshima. The radioactive fallout would be much worse than the contamination that Belarusians experienced after the 1986 Chornobyl disaster. Last week, as G7 leaders gathered in Hiroshima, I urged the world to take action against this dangerous escalation. If we don’t react, then other dictators with nuclear ambitions will feel encouraged to raise the stakes. We can’t play this game, because there is only one outcome; nuclear devastation. Since the beginning of the Russian full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Putin has used his nuclear arsenal to intimidate the world. As the Russian army has proven ineffective, he is playing the last card that he has. But these threats didn’t stop the democratic world from supporting Ukraine in the fight for freedom. And we can’t let this latest piece of nuclear blackmail stop us. The deployment of any kind of nuclear weapons in Belarus is not only a violation of international commitments such as the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and the Budapest Memorandum of 1994. It also violates our non-nuclear status under the Constitution & the will of the Belarusian people. It will make Belarusians hostages to Russian imperial ambitions. It is not too late, but time is running out. I ask our partners & allies to take firm steps to prevent the deployment of nuclear weapons in Belarus. I ask you to consider preventive sanctions on Russia & Lukashenka’s regime. They must know that if the deployment happens – the dictators will face devastating consequences. Belarusians deserve to live in a free, democratic & safe country. We all deserve to live in a free & safe Europe. Let’s make this come true.

Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya

247,474 次观看 • 3 年前

#WATCH | Surat, Gujarat: On India advancing civil nuclear programme, Senior Scientist, Dept. of Atomic Energy, Dr Neelam Goyal says, "... India’s economy rests on three pillars: agriculture, industry, and services. The backbone of all three is electricity. At present, around 70% of India’s electricity comes from coal, with much of the quality coal imported from Indonesia. This costs the country roughly Rs 12,000 crore annually. To achieve self-reliance, India must develop domestic energy sources. India possesses vast reserves of thorium—around 85% of the world’s supply—enough to generate 5,000 units of electricity per person per year for 500 years, compared to the current 1,000 units. Yet nuclear energy faces public resistance due to misconceptions and fear. As a result, nuclear projects are often delayed for a decade or more. I completed my PhD in 2008 at Rajasthan University, studying the impact of nuclear power plants on regional economies, welfare, and health. In 2009, I undertook postdoctoral training with India’s Department of Atomic Energy in Mumbai... Since 2011, after the Fukushima disaster, I have worked to raise awareness and reduce opposition to nuclear energy across states, including Haryana, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, and Gujarat. Currently, India operates 23 reactors using uranium, imported from countries such as Australia and Mongolia. Uranium is a fissile element, and its by-product, plutonium, can also be used as fuel. India’s fast breeder reactor programme now utilises plutonium, and when combined with thorium, it can be converted into uranium-233, a powerful fissile material. This opens the door to smaller reactors and long-term energy independence, potentially supplying India with abundant electricity for years."
4:53

#WATCH | Surat, Gujarat: On India advancing civil nuclear programme, Senior Scientist, Dept. of Atomic Energy, Dr Neelam Goyal says, "... India’s economy rests on three pillars: agriculture, industry, and services. The backbone of all three is electricity. At present, around 70% of India’s electricity comes from coal, with much of the quality coal imported from Indonesia. This costs the country roughly Rs 12,000 crore annually. To achieve self-reliance, India must develop domestic energy sources. India possesses vast reserves of thorium—around 85% of the world’s supply—enough to generate 5,000 units of electricity per person per year for 500 years, compared to the current 1,000 units. Yet nuclear energy faces public resistance due to misconceptions and fear. As a result, nuclear projects are often delayed for a decade or more. I completed my PhD in 2008 at Rajasthan University, studying the impact of nuclear power plants on regional economies, welfare, and health. In 2009, I undertook postdoctoral training with India’s Department of Atomic Energy in Mumbai... Since 2011, after the Fukushima disaster, I have worked to raise awareness and reduce opposition to nuclear energy across states, including Haryana, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, and Gujarat. Currently, India operates 23 reactors using uranium, imported from countries such as Australia and Mongolia. Uranium is a fissile element, and its by-product, plutonium, can also be used as fuel. India’s fast breeder reactor programme now utilises plutonium, and when combined with thorium, it can be converted into uranium-233, a powerful fissile material. This opens the door to smaller reactors and long-term energy independence, potentially supplying India with abundant electricity for years."

ANI

19,136 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨🚨🚨 IRAN'S FOREIGN MINISTER JUST SAID THE MOST TERRIFYING 15 WORDS OF THIS ENTIRE WAR. READ EVERY SINGLE ONE. 🚨🚨🚨 "They struck our nuclear facilities, but they could not destroy Iran's nuclear program." That's Iran's FM Abbas Araghchi — CONFIRMING the strikes hit nuclear sites. And telling the world it didn't work. Let that sink in. 💀 The US used its most powerful bunker-buster bombs on Natanz 💀 Iran is publicly CONFIRMING the nuclear sites were hit 💀 And in the SAME sentence saying the program SURVIVED 💀 Iran isn't denying, hiding, or deflecting — they're TAUNTING 💀 "You hit us with everything you had. We're STILL here." ⚠️ The US spent $2,000,000,000,000+ developing the most advanced bunker-buster arsenal on Earth — specifically for this moment. Iran says it wasn't enough. ⚠️ Israel destroyed Iraq's Osirak reactor in 1981 with ONE strike and ended Iraq's nuclear program forever. Iran just took the same hit and said "try again." The media is showing you "US strikes Iran's nuclear facilities" like it's mission accomplished. They're NOT showing you that Iran just told the ENTIRE world: our nuclear program is deeper, more dispersed, and more protected than your best weapons can reach. Here's what that means → and what comes NEXT: → Iran built Natanz underground. The US bombed it. Iran says it survived. → Iran built Fordow INSIDE A MOUNTAIN. If Natanz survived, Fordow is untouchable. → Iran has spent 20 years building redundancy — multiple sites, multiple depths, multiple locations → The US just used its BEST shot. If it didn't work, there is no Plan B short of a nuclear weapon. Now here's the part nobody is saying out loud: Iran's nuclear program just went from "peaceful enrichment" to "existential survival." Before today, Iran could negotiate. They had leverage. They could trade their program for sanctions relief. After today? Their nuclear facilities have been BOMBED. The diplomatic path is DEAD. If you're Iran and your "peaceful" nuclear sites were just attacked — what's the argument for NOT building a weapon anymore? The US didn't destroy Iran's nuclear program. They just gave Iran the justification to FINISH it. Every nuclear expert on Earth is thinking the same thing right now: the clock to an Iranian bomb just got shorter, not longer. What happens next: → Iran accelerates enrichment at sites the US CAN'T reach → Iran withdraws from the NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) → The IAEA loses ALL access to Iranian nuclear sites → Within 12-18 months, Iran has enough material for a weapon → And the world has ZERO visibility into what's happening underground The most dangerous sentence in geopolitics isn't a threat. It's "you hit us and we're still standing." Iran just said it. To the entire world. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 They don't want you seeing this. Follow + RT to beat the algorithm. 🚨
0:35

🚨🚨🚨 IRAN'S FOREIGN MINISTER JUST SAID THE MOST TERRIFYING 15 WORDS OF THIS ENTIRE WAR. READ EVERY SINGLE ONE. 🚨🚨🚨 "They struck our nuclear facilities, but they could not destroy Iran's nuclear program." That's Iran's FM Abbas Araghchi — CONFIRMING the strikes hit nuclear sites. And telling the world it didn't work. Let that sink in. 💀 The US used its most powerful bunker-buster bombs on Natanz 💀 Iran is publicly CONFIRMING the nuclear sites were hit 💀 And in the SAME sentence saying the program SURVIVED 💀 Iran isn't denying, hiding, or deflecting — they're TAUNTING 💀 "You hit us with everything you had. We're STILL here." ⚠️ The US spent $2,000,000,000,000+ developing the most advanced bunker-buster arsenal on Earth — specifically for this moment. Iran says it wasn't enough. ⚠️ Israel destroyed Iraq's Osirak reactor in 1981 with ONE strike and ended Iraq's nuclear program forever. Iran just took the same hit and said "try again." The media is showing you "US strikes Iran's nuclear facilities" like it's mission accomplished. They're NOT showing you that Iran just told the ENTIRE world: our nuclear program is deeper, more dispersed, and more protected than your best weapons can reach. Here's what that means → and what comes NEXT: → Iran built Natanz underground. The US bombed it. Iran says it survived. → Iran built Fordow INSIDE A MOUNTAIN. If Natanz survived, Fordow is untouchable. → Iran has spent 20 years building redundancy — multiple sites, multiple depths, multiple locations → The US just used its BEST shot. If it didn't work, there is no Plan B short of a nuclear weapon. Now here's the part nobody is saying out loud: Iran's nuclear program just went from "peaceful enrichment" to "existential survival." Before today, Iran could negotiate. They had leverage. They could trade their program for sanctions relief. After today? Their nuclear facilities have been BOMBED. The diplomatic path is DEAD. If you're Iran and your "peaceful" nuclear sites were just attacked — what's the argument for NOT building a weapon anymore? The US didn't destroy Iran's nuclear program. They just gave Iran the justification to FINISH it. Every nuclear expert on Earth is thinking the same thing right now: the clock to an Iranian bomb just got shorter, not longer. What happens next: → Iran accelerates enrichment at sites the US CAN'T reach → Iran withdraws from the NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) → The IAEA loses ALL access to Iranian nuclear sites → Within 12-18 months, Iran has enough material for a weapon → And the world has ZERO visibility into what's happening underground The most dangerous sentence in geopolitics isn't a threat. It's "you hit us and we're still standing." Iran just said it. To the entire world. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 They don't want you seeing this. Follow + RT to beat the algorithm. 🚨

🇨🇳 陈杰森 Jason Chen

813,482 次观看 • 4 个月前

WHAT IF Pakistan launches a nuclear attack on India. In just one week, India and Pakistan - both nuclear-armed nations - have exchanged missile, drone, and artillery strikes, marking the most dangerous escalation in over 50 years. The violence began with the tragic killing of 26 tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir, sparking retaliation and escalating tensions. Civilian casualties are mounting: At least 31 reported dead in Pakistan from Indian strikes, including children as young as three. At least 12 dead and 57 injured in Indian-administered Kashmir from Pakistani shelling. Mass evacuations are now underway in border areas. Air travel has been severely disrupted, with airlines avoiding Pakistani airspace and airports closed in northern India and Pakistan. This is no longer just a regional dispute, it has global consequences. Experts warn that even a limited nuclear exchange could lead to mass casualties and environmental devastation on an unimaginable scale. The root cause? The unresolved Kashmir conflict. Without genuine dialogue and international engagement, peace will remain out of reach, and the risk of catastrophic war will persist ,for all of humanity. 🕊️ It's time for the world to pay attention. The stakes have never been higher.
1:26

WHAT IF Pakistan launches a nuclear attack on India. In just one week, India and Pakistan - both nuclear-armed nations - have exchanged missile, drone, and artillery strikes, marking the most dangerous escalation in over 50 years. The violence began with the tragic killing of 26 tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir, sparking retaliation and escalating tensions. Civilian casualties are mounting: At least 31 reported dead in Pakistan from Indian strikes, including children as young as three. At least 12 dead and 57 injured in Indian-administered Kashmir from Pakistani shelling. Mass evacuations are now underway in border areas. Air travel has been severely disrupted, with airlines avoiding Pakistani airspace and airports closed in northern India and Pakistan. This is no longer just a regional dispute, it has global consequences. Experts warn that even a limited nuclear exchange could lead to mass casualties and environmental devastation on an unimaginable scale. The root cause? The unresolved Kashmir conflict. Without genuine dialogue and international engagement, peace will remain out of reach, and the risk of catastrophic war will persist ,for all of humanity. 🕊️ It's time for the world to pay attention. The stakes have never been higher.

FII DII Data

40,987 次观看 • 1 年前

REPORT: Nuclear war talk is no longer unthinkable, it’s now part of everyday political conversation. And that alone should alarm you. What used to be an obvious red line is now being openly discussed by insiders, strategists, and media figures as tensions continue to escalate. As ZeeeMediaOfficial points out, the idea of using nuclear weapons is no longer being treated as untouchable. From Newt Gingrich floating the idea of dropping a dozen nukes on the Strait of Hormuz, to Trump’s AI czar David Sacks warning that Israel could consider nuclear escalation if pushed to the brink, the conversation is accelerating into dangerous territory. Colonel Douglas Macgregor raised similar concerns, questioning how quickly this could move beyond U.S. control, while Russia’s Sergei Lavrov warns the conflict could trigger a broader nuclear arms race. At the same time, Bill O’Reilly says America is in a precarious position, with allies refusing to step in and Israel increasingly isolated. A global fuel crisis is also beginning to take shape, with countries like Australia and New Zealand now floating limits on driving, adding another layer of strain to an already volatile situation. So where does this go from here, and what happens if that final line disappears? Watch the full report before we find out the hard way. 👇
10:35

REPORT: Nuclear war talk is no longer unthinkable, it’s now part of everyday political conversation. And that alone should alarm you. What used to be an obvious red line is now being openly discussed by insiders, strategists, and media figures as tensions continue to escalate. As ZeeeMediaOfficial points out, the idea of using nuclear weapons is no longer being treated as untouchable. From Newt Gingrich floating the idea of dropping a dozen nukes on the Strait of Hormuz, to Trump’s AI czar David Sacks warning that Israel could consider nuclear escalation if pushed to the brink, the conversation is accelerating into dangerous territory. Colonel Douglas Macgregor raised similar concerns, questioning how quickly this could move beyond U.S. control, while Russia’s Sergei Lavrov warns the conflict could trigger a broader nuclear arms race. At the same time, Bill O’Reilly says America is in a precarious position, with allies refusing to step in and Israel increasingly isolated. A global fuel crisis is also beginning to take shape, with countries like Australia and New Zealand now floating limits on driving, adding another layer of strain to an already volatile situation. So where does this go from here, and what happens if that final line disappears? Watch the full report before we find out the hard way. 👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

23,910 次观看 • 4 个月前

Google inks historic US deal to buy Gen IV nuclear power for data centers | Neetika Walter Kairos Power’s Hermes 2 reactor will deliver 50 MW of carbon-free power by 2030, with TVA channeling the energy to Google’s data centers. Google has announced the first power purchase agreement (PPA) between a U.S. utility and an advanced nuclear developer. Through the deal, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) will buy electricity from Kairos Power’s Hermes 2 demonstration plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The 50-megawatt reactor is expected to begin operations in 2030, sending power to TVA’s grid and supporting Google’s data centers in Tennessee and Alabama. One-of-a-kind milestone This marks the first time a U.S. utility has committed to purchasing electricity from a Generation IV nuclear plant. For Google, it represents an early step in a longer-term collaboration with Kairos Power to unlock as much as 500 megawatts of nuclear capacity over the next decade. The Hermes 2 project also carries symbolic weight, reviving Oak Ridge’s historic role as a hub for nuclear innovation. Google has steadily expanded its presence in the Tennessee Valley over the past decade and has worked closely with TVA to add clean energy to the region. With artificial intelligence workloads and cloud services driving demand for reliable electricity, the company is now betting on advanced nuclear as part of its strategy to secure 24/7 carbon-free energy. The U.S. grid is under growing strain as AI, electrification, and population growth push power demand to new highs. Traditional sources of clean power, such as wind and solar, cannot always deliver around the clock, while large nuclear plants face long timelines and high costs. Small and modular nuclear reactors offer a potential solution, providing carbon-free capacity with more flexibility. Trump push gives nuclear fresh momentum The move comes as the Trump administration has accelerated support for advanced nuclear. In May, the White House signed executive orders to streamline licensing for micro-reactors and small modular reactors, to triple or even quadruple U.S. nuclear output by mid-century. Federal agencies have also launched pilot projects to test more than a dozen small reactors, many on federal land to avoid permitting delays. These steps have helped renew investor interest in nuclear technology and created room for private-sector deals like Google’s. Energy startups such as Oklo have seen their shares climb after securing government partnerships, underscoring the link between policy reform and commercial appetite. Google’s nuclear partnership reflects this broader momentum. The deal highlights how next-generation technologies can find a pathway to market by combining utility-scale, regulatory support, and private-sector demand. For Oak Ridge, the project could deliver economic benefits alongside energy breakthroughs. Kairos Power plans to train a new generation of nuclear workers in partnership with the University of Tennessee and other institutions. The Hermes 2 plant will also anchor efforts to re-establish the city as a center of nuclear innovation. In signing on to the project, Google is not only securing clean power for its data centers but also helping to push advanced nuclear toward commercial reality. Read more:
2:28

Google inks historic US deal to buy Gen IV nuclear power for data centers | Neetika Walter Kairos Power’s Hermes 2 reactor will deliver 50 MW of carbon-free power by 2030, with TVA channeling the energy to Google’s data centers. Google has announced the first power purchase agreement (PPA) between a U.S. utility and an advanced nuclear developer. Through the deal, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) will buy electricity from Kairos Power’s Hermes 2 demonstration plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The 50-megawatt reactor is expected to begin operations in 2030, sending power to TVA’s grid and supporting Google’s data centers in Tennessee and Alabama. One-of-a-kind milestone This marks the first time a U.S. utility has committed to purchasing electricity from a Generation IV nuclear plant. For Google, it represents an early step in a longer-term collaboration with Kairos Power to unlock as much as 500 megawatts of nuclear capacity over the next decade. The Hermes 2 project also carries symbolic weight, reviving Oak Ridge’s historic role as a hub for nuclear innovation. Google has steadily expanded its presence in the Tennessee Valley over the past decade and has worked closely with TVA to add clean energy to the region. With artificial intelligence workloads and cloud services driving demand for reliable electricity, the company is now betting on advanced nuclear as part of its strategy to secure 24/7 carbon-free energy. The U.S. grid is under growing strain as AI, electrification, and population growth push power demand to new highs. Traditional sources of clean power, such as wind and solar, cannot always deliver around the clock, while large nuclear plants face long timelines and high costs. Small and modular nuclear reactors offer a potential solution, providing carbon-free capacity with more flexibility. Trump push gives nuclear fresh momentum The move comes as the Trump administration has accelerated support for advanced nuclear. In May, the White House signed executive orders to streamline licensing for micro-reactors and small modular reactors, to triple or even quadruple U.S. nuclear output by mid-century. Federal agencies have also launched pilot projects to test more than a dozen small reactors, many on federal land to avoid permitting delays. These steps have helped renew investor interest in nuclear technology and created room for private-sector deals like Google’s. Energy startups such as Oklo have seen their shares climb after securing government partnerships, underscoring the link between policy reform and commercial appetite. Google’s nuclear partnership reflects this broader momentum. The deal highlights how next-generation technologies can find a pathway to market by combining utility-scale, regulatory support, and private-sector demand. For Oak Ridge, the project could deliver economic benefits alongside energy breakthroughs. Kairos Power plans to train a new generation of nuclear workers in partnership with the University of Tennessee and other institutions. The Hermes 2 plant will also anchor efforts to re-establish the city as a center of nuclear innovation. In signing on to the project, Google is not only securing clean power for its data centers but also helping to push advanced nuclear toward commercial reality. Read more:

Owen Gregorian

31,255 次观看 • 11 个月前

IAEA REPORT EXPOSES PAST SECRET NUCLEAR ACTIVITIES IN IRAN. Iran joined the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in 1970 but was found in non-compliance in 2003 and 2015 by the IAEA for failing to report enrichment activities. This non-compliance happened again in 2025. This entire situation has been going on for a lot longer than 95% of people understand, while also tracing significant amounts of cash given to Iran and Iran-backed terrorists groups by Obama and other deep state actors, like during the Iran-Contra affair under Reagan from 1981-1986 when our own CIA was selling weapons to Iran terrorist groups. This is also not war, it was a precision military operation which included precise targets and nothing else. They were begged to come to the table and given numerous chances and did not comply over and over again. Trump never needed Congress and their approval in the first place either. Not to mention numerous strikes that were all also done by Obama and Biden without Congresses approval, but no one will mention any of these, which include: Barack Obama (2009-2017): Libya in 2011, Syria in 2014+, and Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia from 2009-2017. Joe Biden (2021-2025): Syria, Somalia, and Yemen 2021,2022,2023, and 2024. There was No Congressional Approval for any of these strikes. President Trump has been stating that Iran can not have a nuclear weapon for sometime and made speeches even before his first presidency. Nov. 4, 2011: National Press Club, "We can't allow Iran to go nuclear." Feb. 4, 2015: Fox News Interview, "Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon." May. 1, 2017: As president, Trump told a joint session of Congress, "I want them to end up being a great country, frankly, but they can't have a nuclear weapon." Jun. 17, 2025: In a White House Address, Trump reiterated, "Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Yes we do not know what the future holds, but peace is the overall goal. No matter what you might think. Do not feed into the drama and remember the overall plan and goal. Israel will now have no reason to blame Iran and accuse them of using this excuse to attack them as well. This entire situation is so much deeper and if you have been paying attention you should understand this already. There are also people in Iran who have been fighting their own government for a regime change for over 45+ years. They do not have the freedoms like we do and the situation with child abuse and the marriage laws are beyond disturbing. Israel and the blackmailing of our politicians and others around the world is a major problem as well. You have to look at this from a military advantage perspective. Do you not believe Trump doesn't understand what is going on and would take on two nations at once head on? This is the art of war and peace is the overall goal with minimal casualties. Remember, layers, optics, and timing. America first. The PEOPLE first. Logical, not emotional. Trust your president, trust the plan, and have faith. Links: IAEA board declares Iran in breach of non-proliferation obligations: Damning IAEA report spells out past secret nuclear activities in Iran: IAEA 2025 Findings and NPT Safeguards Agreement with the Islamic Republic of Iran:
10:29

IAEA REPORT EXPOSES PAST SECRET NUCLEAR ACTIVITIES IN IRAN. Iran joined the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in 1970 but was found in non-compliance in 2003 and 2015 by the IAEA for failing to report enrichment activities. This non-compliance happened again in 2025. This entire situation has been going on for a lot longer than 95% of people understand, while also tracing significant amounts of cash given to Iran and Iran-backed terrorists groups by Obama and other deep state actors, like during the Iran-Contra affair under Reagan from 1981-1986 when our own CIA was selling weapons to Iran terrorist groups. This is also not war, it was a precision military operation which included precise targets and nothing else. They were begged to come to the table and given numerous chances and did not comply over and over again. Trump never needed Congress and their approval in the first place either. Not to mention numerous strikes that were all also done by Obama and Biden without Congresses approval, but no one will mention any of these, which include: Barack Obama (2009-2017): Libya in 2011, Syria in 2014+, and Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia from 2009-2017. Joe Biden (2021-2025): Syria, Somalia, and Yemen 2021,2022,2023, and 2024. There was No Congressional Approval for any of these strikes. President Trump has been stating that Iran can not have a nuclear weapon for sometime and made speeches even before his first presidency. Nov. 4, 2011: National Press Club, "We can't allow Iran to go nuclear." Feb. 4, 2015: Fox News Interview, "Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon." May. 1, 2017: As president, Trump told a joint session of Congress, "I want them to end up being a great country, frankly, but they can't have a nuclear weapon." Jun. 17, 2025: In a White House Address, Trump reiterated, "Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Yes we do not know what the future holds, but peace is the overall goal. No matter what you might think. Do not feed into the drama and remember the overall plan and goal. Israel will now have no reason to blame Iran and accuse them of using this excuse to attack them as well. This entire situation is so much deeper and if you have been paying attention you should understand this already. There are also people in Iran who have been fighting their own government for a regime change for over 45+ years. They do not have the freedoms like we do and the situation with child abuse and the marriage laws are beyond disturbing. Israel and the blackmailing of our politicians and others around the world is a major problem as well. You have to look at this from a military advantage perspective. Do you not believe Trump doesn't understand what is going on and would take on two nations at once head on? This is the art of war and peace is the overall goal with minimal casualties. Remember, layers, optics, and timing. America first. The PEOPLE first. Logical, not emotional. Trust your president, trust the plan, and have faith. Links: IAEA board declares Iran in breach of non-proliferation obligations: Damning IAEA report spells out past secret nuclear activities in Iran: IAEA 2025 Findings and NPT Safeguards Agreement with the Islamic Republic of Iran:

The SCIF

29,696 次观看 • 1 年前

Iran’s FM Abbas Araghchi asked the UN Security Council for extra time to address the Council so he could correct the record after France accused Iran of refusing diplomacy, in a session that ended with the Council rejecting a last-ditch bid to halt snapback sanctions. Araghchi said he made several proposals in New York, including one agreed with France until Paris backtracked and “couldn’t deliver.” Tehran is cooperating fully with the IAEA, he said, pushing back on French claims that inspectors are absent. “They are now in Iran inspecting our nuclear facilities … exactly according to what we agreed with Director General Grossi in Cairo.” He stated that Iran’s nuclear program “is peaceful and will remain peaceful forever,” pointing to the 2015 JCPOA as proof of Iran’s good faith, noting that it was the United States that abandoned the deal and then struck Iran even while negotiating this year. “Once we negotiated, they withdrew. This year we negotiated, they attacked us. There is no reason why we should trust the United States once more.” Despite this, he said Iran came with “constructive proposals” to the UN this week, and continues inspections under its new agreement with the IAEA.
3:14

Iran’s FM Abbas Araghchi asked the UN Security Council for extra time to address the Council so he could correct the record after France accused Iran of refusing diplomacy, in a session that ended with the Council rejecting a last-ditch bid to halt snapback sanctions. Araghchi said he made several proposals in New York, including one agreed with France until Paris backtracked and “couldn’t deliver.” Tehran is cooperating fully with the IAEA, he said, pushing back on French claims that inspectors are absent. “They are now in Iran inspecting our nuclear facilities … exactly according to what we agreed with Director General Grossi in Cairo.” He stated that Iran’s nuclear program “is peaceful and will remain peaceful forever,” pointing to the 2015 JCPOA as proof of Iran’s good faith, noting that it was the United States that abandoned the deal and then struck Iran even while negotiating this year. “Once we negotiated, they withdrew. This year we negotiated, they attacked us. There is no reason why we should trust the United States once more.” Despite this, he said Iran came with “constructive proposals” to the UN this week, and continues inspections under its new agreement with the IAEA.

Drop Site

64,354 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨 NEW: John Fetterman FLIPS THE SCRIPT on Jake Tapper as he tries a gotcha question to try and get Fetterman to second-guess Trump’s Iran strategy Fetterman instead backs the President and says it is “entirely appropriate” to continue confronting Iran. JAKE TAPPER: “Do you worry at all that this war is now escalating into a wider war? Do you have any questions about the president’s war strategy?” SENATOR FETTERMAN: “I think it’s incredibly important to confront Iran and to confront Iran with their ambitions, specifically the nuclear ambitions.” “Every single Democrat that I’m aware of says we must never let Iran build a nuclear bomb.” “And here we are again right now, negotiations and all other kinds of strategies have been employed over the last 47 years, and they’ve been unsuccessful up to now.” “And so where I’m at, I think we’re in an important point in our time. And I think it’s entirely appropriate to continue to confront Iran.”
0:44

🚨 NEW: John Fetterman FLIPS THE SCRIPT on Jake Tapper as he tries a gotcha question to try and get Fetterman to second-guess Trump’s Iran strategy Fetterman instead backs the President and says it is “entirely appropriate” to continue confronting Iran. JAKE TAPPER: “Do you worry at all that this war is now escalating into a wider war? Do you have any questions about the president’s war strategy?” SENATOR FETTERMAN: “I think it’s incredibly important to confront Iran and to confront Iran with their ambitions, specifically the nuclear ambitions.” “Every single Democrat that I’m aware of says we must never let Iran build a nuclear bomb.” “And here we are again right now, negotiations and all other kinds of strategies have been employed over the last 47 years, and they’ve been unsuccessful up to now.” “And so where I’m at, I think we’re in an important point in our time. And I think it’s entirely appropriate to continue to confront Iran.”

TV News Now

205,780 次观看 • 7 天前

Siddhant Nagrath’s core line in that Oxford Union “India vs Pakistan” debate is that Pakistan’s structure and incentives make sustained hostility and even war with India politically and economically attractive for those who hold power there, and that this is stabilised not restrained by its nuclear posture. ​ Nagrath argues that for 77 years Pakistan’s ruling establishment has had strong incentives to maintain confrontation with India, including the possibility of military action. ​ He contends that Pakistan’s nuclear weapons do not create responsible restraint but instead enable aggressive behaviour under a protective umbrella. ​ He claims it is “politically infeasible” and “economically infeasible” for those who hold the money, power, and politics in Pakistan to avoid war, because conflict sustains their position. ​ According to him, when there is Indo‑Pak conflict, it is not Indian leaders like Narendra Modi whose electoral prospects improve most, but Pakistan’s power brokers, who gain legitimacy and resources from crisis. ​ Terrorism and security argument Nagrath asserts that Pakistan has systematically given terrorists a home, weapons, training, military aid, intelligence support, and guidance on where and how to strike India. ​ On this basis, he argues India faces a security environment in which Pakistan-backed terrorism and the threat of escalation are entrenched tools of state policy rather than aberrations. ​ Rebuttal to “nuclear stabiliser” claim Responding to the proposition’s portrayal of Pakistan as a “great nuclear” stabilising power, he suggests nuclear capability has not translated into responsible de‑escalation. ​ Instead, he frames Pakistan’s nuclear status as part of a bargaining strategy that allows it to internationalise crises and shield itself while continuing support to terror networks. Debate Context The event occurred amid prior Oxford Union controversies, including a collapsed India-Pakistan debate where Nagrath and peers like Viraansh Bhanushali participated after Indian leaders withdrew. Nagrath has debated Kashmir issues before, opposing independence motions. The video has garnered views on the Oxford Union channel, reflecting interest in India-Pakistan geopolitical discourse. Credit : Oxford Union.
10:35

Siddhant Nagrath’s core line in that Oxford Union “India vs Pakistan” debate is that Pakistan’s structure and incentives make sustained hostility and even war with India politically and economically attractive for those who hold power there, and that this is stabilised not restrained by its nuclear posture. ​ Nagrath argues that for 77 years Pakistan’s ruling establishment has had strong incentives to maintain confrontation with India, including the possibility of military action. ​ He contends that Pakistan’s nuclear weapons do not create responsible restraint but instead enable aggressive behaviour under a protective umbrella. ​ He claims it is “politically infeasible” and “economically infeasible” for those who hold the money, power, and politics in Pakistan to avoid war, because conflict sustains their position. ​ According to him, when there is Indo‑Pak conflict, it is not Indian leaders like Narendra Modi whose electoral prospects improve most, but Pakistan’s power brokers, who gain legitimacy and resources from crisis. ​ Terrorism and security argument Nagrath asserts that Pakistan has systematically given terrorists a home, weapons, training, military aid, intelligence support, and guidance on where and how to strike India. ​ On this basis, he argues India faces a security environment in which Pakistan-backed terrorism and the threat of escalation are entrenched tools of state policy rather than aberrations. ​ Rebuttal to “nuclear stabiliser” claim Responding to the proposition’s portrayal of Pakistan as a “great nuclear” stabilising power, he suggests nuclear capability has not translated into responsible de‑escalation. ​ Instead, he frames Pakistan’s nuclear status as part of a bargaining strategy that allows it to internationalise crises and shield itself while continuing support to terror networks. Debate Context The event occurred amid prior Oxford Union controversies, including a collapsed India-Pakistan debate where Nagrath and peers like Viraansh Bhanushali participated after Indian leaders withdrew. Nagrath has debated Kashmir issues before, opposing independence motions. The video has garnered views on the Oxford Union channel, reflecting interest in India-Pakistan geopolitical discourse. Credit : Oxford Union.

Augadh

23,879 次观看 • 7 个月前