Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

An ISRO scientist, Praveen Maurya, claimed that someone from inside was leaking data related to BrahMos. He said they approached him. He refused. They started threatening him. Then suddenly POCSO and NDPS cases were filed on him. He called it a setup to silence him. He lost his job.... show more

aree_shuklajii

15,221 subscribers

94,971 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

THE EVIL RAPHESU WAS SUBJECTED TO UNDER ANDREA JOHNSON Cedric Nkabinde is such a traitor, a weak man who has allowed himself to be used by people to destroy other Black people's lives. He sold General Mkhwanazi to Minister Mchunu by recording his calls with him while he called Mkhwanazi "a close friend". Today we hear he sold out Mantsha Raphesu to Andrea Johnson and her cronies. 😭 Raphesu is so strong and determined to have him arrested. He claimed Raphesu called him to tell him that he was being investigated by IDAC, and the Investigator in the case was Brian Padayachee. There was no such a thing. There was not even an investigation against him. Then Mantsha was called by Johnson to her Office and told the allegations, and asked to hand over everything regarding the cases he was working on. They would institute a disciplinary case against him. Raphesu obviously denied ever calling Nkabinde. He offered to do a Polygraph test, offered to hand over his cellphone to be checked to show he never called Nkabinde. They did not do as he proposed. They took from February to October not saying anything to him about the disciplinary case, meanwhile sidelining him in the office. He wrote to them in October and enquired what was happening with the case. He has been told Nkabinde has written an Affidavit probably to withdraw his allegations. Raphesu has requested the Commission to assist him with an Investigator to make sure his matter doesn't land in wrong hands as he put it. He is going to open a criminal case against him. As he should. Currently he says he was removed from any cases relating to the Security Cluster. He is allocated cases from the Zondo Commission, Transnet etc. He says he just sits in his corner in that office. Andrea Johnson and all the people who schemed with her to destroy people's lives must pay a heavy price. This young man must fight for his rights. #MadlangaCommission

THE EVIL RAPHESU WAS SUBJECTED TO UNDER ANDREA JOHNSON Cedric Nkabinde is such a traitor, a weak man who has allowed himself to be used by people to destroy other Black people's lives. He sold General Mkhwanazi to Minister Mchunu by recording his calls with him while he called Mkhwanazi "a close friend". Today we hear he sold out Mantsha Raphesu to Andrea Johnson and her cronies. 😭 Raphesu is so strong and determined to have him arrested. He claimed Raphesu called him to tell him that he was being investigated by IDAC, and the Investigator in the case was Brian Padayachee. There was no such a thing. There was not even an investigation against him. Then Mantsha was called by Johnson to her Office and told the allegations, and asked to hand over everything regarding the cases he was working on. They would institute a disciplinary case against him. Raphesu obviously denied ever calling Nkabinde. He offered to do a Polygraph test, offered to hand over his cellphone to be checked to show he never called Nkabinde. They did not do as he proposed. They took from February to October not saying anything to him about the disciplinary case, meanwhile sidelining him in the office. He wrote to them in October and enquired what was happening with the case. He has been told Nkabinde has written an Affidavit probably to withdraw his allegations. Raphesu has requested the Commission to assist him with an Investigator to make sure his matter doesn't land in wrong hands as he put it. He is going to open a criminal case against him. As he should. Currently he says he was removed from any cases relating to the Security Cluster. He is allocated cases from the Zondo Commission, Transnet etc. He says he just sits in his corner in that office. Andrea Johnson and all the people who schemed with her to destroy people's lives must pay a heavy price. This young man must fight for his rights. #MadlangaCommission

Tau e Tshehadi

52,834 views • 1 month ago

“He pose no threat, he was already tied…are they trying to conceal something or a confession that we do not know?… when he was trying to confess they k!lled him… they k!lled him further in the police station… this story look like more than meets the eyes to me” ~Rufai Oseni

“He pose no threat, he was already tied…are they trying to conceal something or a confession that we do not know?… when he was trying to confess they k!lled him… they k!lled him further in the police station… this story look like more than meets the eyes to me” ~Rufai Oseni

JOE

365,458 views • 4 months ago

The way she’s trying to tell him that Cole Allen never actually said he was talking about him,but Trump automatically assumed it was him and that makes you question why! The way he speaks to her is how a Malignant Narcissist and Misogynist speaks to a woman! No really isn’t No.

The way she’s trying to tell him that Cole Allen never actually said he was talking about him,but Trump automatically assumed it was him and that makes you question why! The way he speaks to her is how a Malignant Narcissist and Misogynist speaks to a woman! No really isn’t No.

Suzie rizzio

12,612 views • 4 months ago

“Akpabio was made senate president because he has numerous EFCC cases against him. So each time they present an issue to him, they remind him of his EFCC cases and then he would bow. The day he stops doing tinubu’s bidding, they will send him to prison where he belongs.

“Akpabio was made senate president because he has numerous EFCC cases against him. So each time they present an issue to him, they remind him of his EFCC cases and then he would bow. The day he stops doing tinubu’s bidding, they will send him to prison where he belongs.

MaziTundeEdnutfan

31,889 views • 2 months ago

Despite these criminals trying to ensure journalists do not capture the state of comrade Eddie Mutwe, you can see him limping and unable to walk on his own. We have been told that his head and feet are swollen. He was badly beaten. He is unable to walk unaided. He is in a pathetic state. And yet, when he was abducted, he was very healthy. This is what Museveni's son did to him! Instead of releasing him to get treatment, they rushed him to a court and a judicial officer shamelessly remanded him.

Despite these criminals trying to ensure journalists do not capture the state of comrade Eddie Mutwe, you can see him limping and unable to walk on his own. We have been told that his head and feet are swollen. He was badly beaten. He is unable to walk unaided. He is in a pathetic state. And yet, when he was abducted, he was very healthy. This is what Museveni's son did to him! Instead of releasing him to get treatment, they rushed him to a court and a judicial officer shamelessly remanded him.

BOBI WINE

236,768 views • 1 year ago

“it was all of a sudden, the company went through a lot” jin about his decision to tour. the fact they asked him if he wanted to do it and he initially said no and then changed his mind 😭 love him

“it was all of a sudden, the company went through a lot” jin about his decision to tour. the fact they asked him if he wanted to do it and he initially said no and then changed his mind 😭 love him

sophie

140,638 views • 1 year ago

They chased him off the property. Even if the teen had a gun, and even if that gun fell during the chase, the bigger question is whether he had reason to fear for his own life once grown men were pursuing him away from the store. From his perspective, he may not have known what they intended to do. He could have believed they were chasing him to beat him, hold him, or even kidnap him. In that situation, it is fair to ask whether he also had a right to defend himself. The focus should not only be on whether he had a gun. The focus should also be on why he was chased off the property in the first place and whether the people chasing him created the danger that led to the shooting.

They chased him off the property. Even if the teen had a gun, and even if that gun fell during the chase, the bigger question is whether he had reason to fear for his own life once grown men were pursuing him away from the store. From his perspective, he may not have known what they intended to do. He could have believed they were chasing him to beat him, hold him, or even kidnap him. In that situation, it is fair to ask whether he also had a right to defend himself. The focus should not only be on whether he had a gun. The focus should also be on why he was chased off the property in the first place and whether the people chasing him created the danger that led to the shooting.

Arthur Watkins Jr. 🇺🇸

14,383 views • 3 months ago

woongki tmi: he said he went to olive young and heard pinocchio was playing so he took a video, then when they were about to pay he said the staff recognized him and told him they were a fan.

woongki tmi: he said he went to olive young and heard pinocchio was playing so he took a video, then when they were about to pay he said the staff recognized him and told him they were a fan.

knives ☻

26,014 views • 7 months ago

8 Days of Silence: Sweden’s Sick Betrayal of Salwan Momika It has been 8 days since my friend Salwan Momika was slaughtered in cold blood. The Swedish government targeted him, persecuted him, left him without protection, and placed him in the very location where he was executed. They knew he was being hunted. They knew there was a $2 million bounty on his head. They knew terrorist groups wanted him dead. Yet they did nothing. Instead, they were trying to destroy him in court, strip him of his rights, and deport him to his Sharia executioners. Hours after his murder, Sweden’s government-funded media aired an interview with a woman wearing a Södertälje municipality jacket—justifying his execution. Instead of outrage, she lectured Swedes about "respecting Allah." No sympathy. No condemnation. Just submission. And here we are, 8 days later. 🔴 No information on who killed him. 🔴 No justice. 🔴 No accountability. 🔴 No condemnation from Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, who had no problem smearing Quran burners—yet couldn’t even say Salwan’s name, show an ounce of care. Salwan was trying to show the PM what happens when you import Islam—he was trying to warn him that he was putting Swedish citizens in danger. He died trying to wake the PM up. But little did Salwan understand—the PM knew precisely what he was importing. He knew the consequences. He knew the danger. And he welcomed it. They staged a farce—arresting five people only to quietly release them when it was exposed that they had nothing to do with his death. I do not trust the Swedish government. They want this buried. They want this forgotten. Do NOT let them erase Salwan. Do NOT let them get away with this cover-up. We must DEMAND answers. Sweden didn’t just fail Salwan. They set him up. They let him die. And now they are justifying it. They are enforcing blasphemy laws through bloodshed. They are making an example out of him. Sweden is sending a clear message: 🔴 Criticize Islam, and you will be hunted. 🔴 Criticize Islam, and you will be executed. 🔴 Criticize Islam, and the government will smear you, persecute you, and then pretend they had nothing to do with it. Do not stay silent. Do not let up the pressure. Do not let them erase what they did to Salwan. We need answers. We must demand justice.

8 Days of Silence: Sweden’s Sick Betrayal of Salwan Momika It has been 8 days since my friend Salwan Momika was slaughtered in cold blood. The Swedish government targeted him, persecuted him, left him without protection, and placed him in the very location where he was executed. They knew he was being hunted. They knew there was a $2 million bounty on his head. They knew terrorist groups wanted him dead. Yet they did nothing. Instead, they were trying to destroy him in court, strip him of his rights, and deport him to his Sharia executioners. Hours after his murder, Sweden’s government-funded media aired an interview with a woman wearing a Södertälje municipality jacket—justifying his execution. Instead of outrage, she lectured Swedes about "respecting Allah." No sympathy. No condemnation. Just submission. And here we are, 8 days later. 🔴 No information on who killed him. 🔴 No justice. 🔴 No accountability. 🔴 No condemnation from Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, who had no problem smearing Quran burners—yet couldn’t even say Salwan’s name, show an ounce of care. Salwan was trying to show the PM what happens when you import Islam—he was trying to warn him that he was putting Swedish citizens in danger. He died trying to wake the PM up. But little did Salwan understand—the PM knew precisely what he was importing. He knew the consequences. He knew the danger. And he welcomed it. They staged a farce—arresting five people only to quietly release them when it was exposed that they had nothing to do with his death. I do not trust the Swedish government. They want this buried. They want this forgotten. Do NOT let them erase Salwan. Do NOT let them get away with this cover-up. We must DEMAND answers. Sweden didn’t just fail Salwan. They set him up. They let him die. And now they are justifying it. They are enforcing blasphemy laws through bloodshed. They are making an example out of him. Sweden is sending a clear message: 🔴 Criticize Islam, and you will be hunted. 🔴 Criticize Islam, and you will be executed. 🔴 Criticize Islam, and the government will smear you, persecute you, and then pretend they had nothing to do with it. Do not stay silent. Do not let up the pressure. Do not let them erase what they did to Salwan. We need answers. We must demand justice.

Amy Mek

733,818 views • 1 year ago

This is a Hezbollah soldiers surrounded by Israeli troops and drones. He fiercely fought and defended his land despite the bullets raining on him. Look how calm he was. They failed to face him directly so they called in an airstrike to get him

This is a Hezbollah soldiers surrounded by Israeli troops and drones. He fiercely fought and defended his land despite the bullets raining on him. Look how calm he was. They failed to face him directly so they called in an airstrike to get him

Hadi

1,053,172 views • 1 year ago

🚨BREAKING: An ICE/Border Patrol agent approached a U.S. citizen’s car, opened the door without permission, took his keys, threatened to arrest him if he didn’t prove his citizenship, and STILL refused to return his keys after he showed his U.S. PASSPORT. And then, the agent admitted ON CAMERA that the entire detention was unlawful. And here is what makes this even more disturbing… At no point did the agent claim this man committed an actual crime, but still threatened to arrest him. He was just a person who pulled over near a federal immigration operation. And because of that, the agent walked up to his vehicle, opened his door, took his keys, and threatened to put him in jail unless he proved he was a U.S. citizen. Which is not how constitutional rights work. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. The U.S. citizen repeatedly asked… “Why am I being detained?” The agent first claimed he was “suspected of being illegal.” But, they didn’t have evidence to back that claim. And even after showing his U.S. PASSPORT, they refused to give him his keys back… When the U.S. citizen continued questioning why he was detained… the justification changed. Now, the agent claims he was supposedly “impeding an immigration investigation.” The man asked, “How did I impede?” The agent answered, “You pulled up right here.” That was the reason… He pulled over. The man asked, “Did I walk over there?” The agent said, “No.” “You walked to me.” The agent admitted to that. The man never left his car. He never blocked agents. He never interfered with an arrest. He pulled over… and the agent came to him. And note, the issue was never that agent told the U.S. citizen to leave… Then, after failing to justify an excuse for stealing this U.S. citizen’s keys, and threatening to arrest him if he didn’t prove his citizenship, the agent said he detained him because… “You are their boss and you hire illegal aliens.” So, the agent’s justification was not that this U.S. citizen committed a crime, it was that he was connected to people they were investigating. This is exactly why constitutional protections exist. Because if law enforcement can decide someone “looks suspicious,” demand proof of citizenship, seized their property, and threaten to arrest them until they comply with unlawful orders, those rights mean nothing. People have a right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures… regardless of their appearance, their ethnicity, or who they know. And this agent’s own words expose him: He didn’t stop this man. He didn’t pull him over. He didn’t catch him committing a crime. He approached a U.S. citizen, unlawfully detained him, and then tried to justify it afterward.

🚨BREAKING: An ICE/Border Patrol agent approached a U.S. citizen’s car, opened the door without permission, took his keys, threatened to arrest him if he didn’t prove his citizenship, and STILL refused to return his keys after he showed his U.S. PASSPORT. And then, the agent admitted ON CAMERA that the entire detention was unlawful. And here is what makes this even more disturbing… At no point did the agent claim this man committed an actual crime, but still threatened to arrest him. He was just a person who pulled over near a federal immigration operation. And because of that, the agent walked up to his vehicle, opened his door, took his keys, and threatened to put him in jail unless he proved he was a U.S. citizen. Which is not how constitutional rights work. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. The U.S. citizen repeatedly asked… “Why am I being detained?” The agent first claimed he was “suspected of being illegal.” But, they didn’t have evidence to back that claim. And even after showing his U.S. PASSPORT, they refused to give him his keys back… When the U.S. citizen continued questioning why he was detained… the justification changed. Now, the agent claims he was supposedly “impeding an immigration investigation.” The man asked, “How did I impede?” The agent answered, “You pulled up right here.” That was the reason… He pulled over. The man asked, “Did I walk over there?” The agent said, “No.” “You walked to me.” The agent admitted to that. The man never left his car. He never blocked agents. He never interfered with an arrest. He pulled over… and the agent came to him. And note, the issue was never that agent told the U.S. citizen to leave… Then, after failing to justify an excuse for stealing this U.S. citizen’s keys, and threatening to arrest him if he didn’t prove his citizenship, the agent said he detained him because… “You are their boss and you hire illegal aliens.” So, the agent’s justification was not that this U.S. citizen committed a crime, it was that he was connected to people they were investigating. This is exactly why constitutional protections exist. Because if law enforcement can decide someone “looks suspicious,” demand proof of citizenship, seized their property, and threaten to arrest them until they comply with unlawful orders, those rights mean nothing. People have a right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures… regardless of their appearance, their ethnicity, or who they know. And this agent’s own words expose him: He didn’t stop this man. He didn’t pull him over. He didn’t catch him committing a crime. He approached a U.S. citizen, unlawfully detained him, and then tried to justify it afterward.

Jesus Freakin Congress

143,238 views • 1 month ago

Joe Rogan on why he did the Trump interview: "First of all, there was the lawfare... They were trying to convict him and turn him into a felon. And they were doing it so blatantly and obviously... And then when they tried to k*ll him."

Joe Rogan on why he did the Trump interview: "First of all, there was the lawfare... They were trying to convict him and turn him into a felon. And they were doing it so blatantly and obviously... And then when they tried to k*ll him."

Joe Rogan Podcast News

349,949 views • 3 months ago

He was blind to the truth: Nick is no longer a Grimm . What a terrible wedding. They were trying to register him into what he never wanted

He was blind to the truth: Nick is no longer a Grimm . What a terrible wedding. They were trying to register him into what he never wanted

Maro lissy 🎀

63,143 views • 1 month ago

This footage of the Tyler Robinson ‘clones’ is interesting. He has at least 3 guys with their hands on him, as well as a girl and the tall guy who seems to bolt to catch up with the scrimmage of young men. (The girls then run off to the right) Why would they need to all be escorting him like out this? Was he just hysterical from watching Charlie get murdered? Was he drunk? Was he upset about something else? Were they trying to hide him? What are the chances he was wearing shorts and a maroon t-shirt? Candace Owens

This footage of the Tyler Robinson ‘clones’ is interesting. He has at least 3 guys with their hands on him, as well as a girl and the tall guy who seems to bolt to catch up with the scrimmage of young men. (The girls then run off to the right) Why would they need to all be escorting him like out this? Was he just hysterical from watching Charlie get murdered? Was he drunk? Was he upset about something else? Were they trying to hide him? What are the chances he was wearing shorts and a maroon t-shirt? Candace Owens

The Joey Goode Show

31,522 views • 21 days ago

Professional Boxer Ryan Garcia is Going Off about Bohemian Grove 👀 — How he was R*ped and They Forced him to Watch the R*pe of Children • Speaking with Andrew Tate, He claims they tied him down in Bohemian Grove and forced him to watch the r*pe of little children • He claims he was r*ped as a child (2 years old) • He claims they’re calling him to tell him to stop. • He claims he has proof of all the above, but will release it at the right time. • He is tweeting that they are going to kill him Now What the Fook is going on? HT LIZ CROKIN

Sensitive content

Professional Boxer Ryan Garcia is Going Off about Bohemian Grove 👀 — How he was Rped and They Forced him to Watch the Rpe of Children • Speaking with Andrew Tate, He claims they tied him down in Bohemian Grove and forced him to watch the rpe of little children • He claims he was rped as a child (2 years old) • He claims they’re calling him to tell him to stop. • He claims he has proof of all the above, but will release it at the right time. • He is tweeting that they are going to kill him Now What the Fook is going on? HT LIZ CROKIN

MJTruthUltra

3,083,418 views • 2 years ago

Yes on the videos we have so far. The initial encounter was him filming them. There was no gun being brandished. They jumped out of vehicles to go to try to intimidate him. Unfortunately there's no video yet between then and when they had them on the ground. When they had him on the ground they were pistol whipping him, at first it looked like a baton, but it's actually a gun. They had him down with at least five officers. You got to wait for a second so he tried to stand up they shot him in the back he was motionless after they shot him in the back. Then there were four more shots or more after that unloaded into his body from a posture of standing above him. Not a defensive posture. He's supposedly has a gun. It looks like ICE took something out of a holster. So it's likely that he did have a HOLSTERED GUN in an open carry state that is not a reason to shoot someone to death. He was not brandishing it -- again it was his camera. That was the reason for the initial approach was to intimidate him about his camera. It is perfectly legal to film ice This is out not murder once again. Now there is some sort of speculation on social that a gun was dropped and a bullet went off. That would be the ICE AGENTS who took the gun out of his holster. I'll post some videos for people to see in the order that they happened.

Yes on the videos we have so far. The initial encounter was him filming them. There was no gun being brandished. They jumped out of vehicles to go to try to intimidate him. Unfortunately there's no video yet between then and when they had them on the ground. When they had him on the ground they were pistol whipping him, at first it looked like a baton, but it's actually a gun. They had him down with at least five officers. You got to wait for a second so he tried to stand up they shot him in the back he was motionless after they shot him in the back. Then there were four more shots or more after that unloaded into his body from a posture of standing above him. Not a defensive posture. He's supposedly has a gun. It looks like ICE took something out of a holster. So it's likely that he did have a HOLSTERED GUN in an open carry state that is not a reason to shoot someone to death. He was not brandishing it -- again it was his camera. That was the reason for the initial approach was to intimidate him about his camera. It is perfectly legal to film ice This is out not murder once again. Now there is some sort of speculation on social that a gun was dropped and a bullet went off. That would be the ICE AGENTS who took the gun out of his holster. I'll post some videos for people to see in the order that they happened.

Kristine (@schachin on Threads) 🇺🇦

23,566 views • 7 months ago

This dad called 911 because his seven year old autistic son wasn’t behaving and was having a tantrum. The officer that spoke with him told the father that it was completely inappropriate to call the police over this. He said they have an entire town to protect and three officers responded and then asks the dad while chuckling - “can’t handle a seven year old?” The dad tells him that he has called 911 twice before but no one has ever got mad at him like this officer. The officer tells him that they are approaching charging him with false summoning a police officer. He also tells him that if he can’t handle a seven year then maybe they should get CYS involved because clearly the dad needs parenting classes. 😳 Many said the officer was rude and didn’t have to be. That his job is to protect and SERVE the community and that the family was just reaching out, that he needed support and someone to to talk to because they have no idea how hard it is to raise an autistic child? But others said this is not a job for a police officer, that they aren’t counselors and therapists and that there are many resources available through the city that he should using. 💯 I am team police officer. Some may find it rude but this is not in their job description. And being the third time? You have to put a stop to the 911 calls. What do you think? Do you think the officer had a right to be upset and talk the way he was talking to the dad being that this is the third time this has happened? Or, do you think he should have had more compassion for the father?

This dad called 911 because his seven year old autistic son wasn’t behaving and was having a tantrum. The officer that spoke with him told the father that it was completely inappropriate to call the police over this. He said they have an entire town to protect and three officers responded and then asks the dad while chuckling - “can’t handle a seven year old?” The dad tells him that he has called 911 twice before but no one has ever got mad at him like this officer. The officer tells him that they are approaching charging him with false summoning a police officer. He also tells him that if he can’t handle a seven year then maybe they should get CYS involved because clearly the dad needs parenting classes. 😳 Many said the officer was rude and didn’t have to be. That his job is to protect and SERVE the community and that the family was just reaching out, that he needed support and someone to to talk to because they have no idea how hard it is to raise an autistic child? But others said this is not a job for a police officer, that they aren’t counselors and therapists and that there are many resources available through the city that he should using. 💯 I am team police officer. Some may find it rude but this is not in their job description. And being the third time? You have to put a stop to the 911 calls. What do you think? Do you think the officer had a right to be upset and talk the way he was talking to the dad being that this is the third time this has happened? Or, do you think he should have had more compassion for the father?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

26,693 views • 2 months ago