Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

And here’s an app extension replacing Siri AI’s server model with GPT-5.6 Terra. It uses the Inference Providing protocol in Model Manager Services. GPT-5.6 receives Apple’s native Siri planner prompt and tool definitions. It can make tool calls that perform system actions, and receive tool call results with personal...

itspdfu's profile picture

pdfu

2,684 subscribers

45,153 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

6 Yorum

pdfu profil fotoğrafı
pdfu7 gün önce

iOS 27 and macOS Golden Gate have private hooks that let apps add Siri Extensions and replace Siri AI’s server backend with third-party models. First, here’s Claude running as a Siri Extension using the Model Delegation API in App Intents. Claude can appear in Siri’s “Ask…” menu and supports the same underlying flow as the built-in ChatGPT extension. In some cases, Siri Extensions can be more powerful than Siri AI. For example, Siri can’t create a CSV, but Claude can easily return one when asked. When system interaction is required, such as setting a reminder, Claude can relay the original or a modified request back to Siri, which completes the request. Requires the private com\.apple.developer.model-delegation entitlement. (1/2)

MLang profil fotoğrafı
MLang7 gün önce

This was probably used to test their internal Apple models against the SOTA right? Or do you also see this as them preempting the EU where they might force interoperability?

pdfu profil fotoğrafı
pdfu7 gün önce

I don’t see why they couldn’t let third parties register inference provider extensions if they wanted to. The implementation and specifications are already built out.

Scott Wilson profil fotoğrafı
Scott Wilson7 gün önce

@readwise save thread

punch profil fotoğrafı
punch7 gün önce

Yes, we already understand this a bollucks generating machine

COURT profil fotoğrafı
COURT7 gün önce

Can you share how we might do this on our own Mac? I want deeply integrated Siri so badly. AI need to become a core part of the operating system. It’s embarrassing to me that no major news organization makes calls Apple out. Just publish a single Siri 3 minute session vs ChatGPT. 😂

Benzer Videolar

iOS 27 and macOS Golden Gate have private hooks that let apps add Siri Extensions and replace Siri AI’s server backend with third-party models. First, here’s Claude running as a Siri Extension using the Model Delegation API in App Intents. Claude can appear in Siri’s “Ask…” menu and supports the same underlying flow as the built-in ChatGPT extension. In some cases, Siri Extensions can be more powerful than Siri AI. For example, Siri can’t create a CSV, but Claude can easily return one when asked. When system interaction is required, such as setting a reminder, Claude can relay the original or a modified request back to Siri, which completes the request. Requires the private com\.apple.developer.model-delegation entitlement. (1/2)
1:55

iOS 27 and macOS Golden Gate have private hooks that let apps add Siri Extensions and replace Siri AI’s server backend with third-party models. First, here’s Claude running as a Siri Extension using the Model Delegation API in App Intents. Claude can appear in Siri’s “Ask…” menu and supports the same underlying flow as the built-in ChatGPT extension. In some cases, Siri Extensions can be more powerful than Siri AI. For example, Siri can’t create a CSV, but Claude can easily return one when asked. When system interaction is required, such as setting a reminder, Claude can relay the original or a modified request back to Siri, which completes the request. Requires the private com\.apple.developer.model-delegation entitlement. (1/2)

pdfu

1,095,603 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

OpenAI shipped a new speech-to-speech model today: gpt-realtime-2 This is the first speech-to-speech model good enough to use in my voice agents that do "real work." Or real play, for that matter. Here's gpt-realtime-2 as the brain of the ship AI in Gradient Bang. The voice-to-voice response and tool calling times here are unedited, so you can see exactly what the interaction with the model is like in an agent with a very complex system instruction and frequent tool calls. (I did clip out the subagent task execution segments, after gpt-realtime-2 starts a subagent via a tool call. Subagents in this config used gpt-5.2 "medium" effort.)
3:13

OpenAI shipped a new speech-to-speech model today: gpt-realtime-2 This is the first speech-to-speech model good enough to use in my voice agents that do "real work." Or real play, for that matter. Here's gpt-realtime-2 as the brain of the ship AI in Gradient Bang. The voice-to-voice response and tool calling times here are unedited, so you can see exactly what the interaction with the model is like in an agent with a very complex system instruction and frequent tool calls. (I did clip out the subagent task execution segments, after gpt-realtime-2 starts a subagent via a tool call. Subagents in this config used gpt-5.2 "medium" effort.)

kwindla

55,222 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua
0:42

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,919 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Fable 5 just completely redesigned the website and the results are absolutely INSANE. It created a lightning bolt animation that strikes the Get Started CTA. It built an interactive demo of BridgeSpace from scratch. A perfect 1:1 of the real app. It created 3 marketing videos, one for each vibe coding tool in the BridgeMind ecosystem. Fable 5 is by far the best model at UI design. I don't know if GPT 5.6 can beat this.
0:52

Fable 5 just completely redesigned the website and the results are absolutely INSANE. It created a lightning bolt animation that strikes the Get Started CTA. It built an interactive demo of BridgeSpace from scratch. A perfect 1:1 of the real app. It created 3 marketing videos, one for each vibe coding tool in the BridgeMind ecosystem. Fable 5 is by far the best model at UI design. I don't know if GPT 5.6 can beat this.

BridgeMind

53,728 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Introducing PhoneLLM, an open model for voice agents. GPT 5.6 Terra performance on typical voice agent tasks at 1/3 the latency and 1/18 the cost. For voice agents, we need models that are both very low latency and very good at tool calling and instruction following. There's a trade-off here, and we often have to compromise on either latency or capability when building voice agents. With PhoneLLM (and the training and data stack that made this model possible) we're fixing this problem. For the last couple of years, most of the effort in frontier model development has gone towards leveraging test-time compute. Which is awesome! Models of all shapes and sizes are available that perform really, really well ... if you have "thinking" turned on for your model. But if you need your agent to respond at voice conversation speed, you can't use thinking models. PhoneLLM is a full-weights fine-tune of NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 30B. We trained on a wide range of real-world telephone and customer support use cases. The training focused on taking the excellent Nano 30B base capabilities and teaching the model to do typical voice agent tasks with thinking disabled. The results are really good: accurate tool calling and concise, on-topic responses in long conversations. And fast: TTFAT measured server-side is <100ms if you run PhoneLLM on a lightly loaded B200. :-) But seriously, when we characterize model latency, we do it with full, end-to-end, batched request simulations using real Pipecat voice agent pipelines. You can serve more than 80 concurrent agents on a single B200 with P95 end-to-end TTFAT <600ms. Including network overhead. That's an LLM cost-per-minute around $0.0025. (1/4 of a cent.) At a latency lower than any third-party API offers today. More details about this model, including weights on Hugging Face, how to spin it up with one click on Modal, and a starter project repo you can clone, are in the thread ...
3:28

Introducing PhoneLLM, an open model for voice agents. GPT 5.6 Terra performance on typical voice agent tasks at 1/3 the latency and 1/18 the cost. For voice agents, we need models that are both very low latency and very good at tool calling and instruction following. There's a trade-off here, and we often have to compromise on either latency or capability when building voice agents. With PhoneLLM (and the training and data stack that made this model possible) we're fixing this problem. For the last couple of years, most of the effort in frontier model development has gone towards leveraging test-time compute. Which is awesome! Models of all shapes and sizes are available that perform really, really well ... if you have "thinking" turned on for your model. But if you need your agent to respond at voice conversation speed, you can't use thinking models. PhoneLLM is a full-weights fine-tune of NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 30B. We trained on a wide range of real-world telephone and customer support use cases. The training focused on taking the excellent Nano 30B base capabilities and teaching the model to do typical voice agent tasks with thinking disabled. The results are really good: accurate tool calling and concise, on-topic responses in long conversations. And fast: TTFAT measured server-side is <100ms if you run PhoneLLM on a lightly loaded B200. :-) But seriously, when we characterize model latency, we do it with full, end-to-end, batched request simulations using real Pipecat voice agent pipelines. You can serve more than 80 concurrent agents on a single B200 with P95 end-to-end TTFAT <600ms. Including network overhead. That's an LLM cost-per-minute around $0.0025. (1/4 of a cent.) At a latency lower than any third-party API offers today. More details about this model, including weights on Hugging Face, how to spin it up with one click on Modal, and a starter project repo you can clone, are in the thread ...

kwindla

330,647 görüntüleme • 24 gün önce

I built an app inspired by Be My Eyes that lets blind and low vision people ask AI about what’s in front of their camera. It uses GPT-Live-1 for the voice conversation and GPT-5.6 checks camera snapshots to help read labels, identify products, etc I think voice models have a lot of untouched surface area to build experiences that materially improve people’s lives. From boring stuff like making customer service not a headache to assisting people with disabilities 🌸
0:40

I built an app inspired by Be My Eyes that lets blind and low vision people ask AI about what’s in front of their camera. It uses GPT-Live-1 for the voice conversation and GPT-5.6 checks camera snapshots to help read labels, identify products, etc I think voice models have a lot of untouched surface area to build experiences that materially improve people’s lives. From boring stuff like making customer service not a headache to assisting people with disabilities 🌸

cami

41,191 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce

meta just dropped a bomb. Muse Spark 1.1 is 86% cheaper than GPT-5.6 Sol and 91% cheaper than Fable 5 on output tokens ($4.25 vs $30 vs $50 per M) I thought the model was going to be horrendous, but it ended up being insanely fast, and very capable. front end design is VERY strong. Agentic capabilities seem great as it was able to spawn and even orchestrate other agents inside my app cnvs using the mcp and cli tool with zero instruction. we have soo many insanely good models right now.
0:56

meta just dropped a bomb. Muse Spark 1.1 is 86% cheaper than GPT-5.6 Sol and 91% cheaper than Fable 5 on output tokens ($4.25 vs $30 vs $50 per M) I thought the model was going to be horrendous, but it ended up being insanely fast, and very capable. front end design is VERY strong. Agentic capabilities seem great as it was able to spawn and even orchestrate other agents inside my app cnvs using the mcp and cli tool with zero instruction. we have soo many insanely good models right now.

Max Blade

88,802 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

AutoGPT might be the next big step in AI. Here's why Karpathy recently said "AutoGPT is the next frontier of prompt engineering" AutoGPT is the equivalent of giving GPT-based models a memory and a body. You can now give a task to an AI agent and have it autonomously come up with a plan, execute on it, browse the web, and use new data to revise the strategy until the task is completed. It can analyze the market and come up with a trading strategy, customer service, marketing, finance, or other tasks that requires continuous updates. There are three components to it: 1. Architecture: It leverages GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 via API. 2. Autonomous Iterations: AutoGPT can refine its outputs by self-critical review, building on its previous work and integrating prompt history for more accurate results. 3. Memory Management: Integration with Pinecone allows for long-term memory storage, enabling context preservation and improved decision-making. 4. Multi-functionality: Capabilities include file manipulation, web browsing, and data retrieval, distinguishing AutoGPT from previous AI advancements by broadening its application scope.
0:29

AutoGPT might be the next big step in AI. Here's why Karpathy recently said "AutoGPT is the next frontier of prompt engineering" AutoGPT is the equivalent of giving GPT-based models a memory and a body. You can now give a task to an AI agent and have it autonomously come up with a plan, execute on it, browse the web, and use new data to revise the strategy until the task is completed. It can analyze the market and come up with a trading strategy, customer service, marketing, finance, or other tasks that requires continuous updates. There are three components to it: 1. Architecture: It leverages GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 via API. 2. Autonomous Iterations: AutoGPT can refine its outputs by self-critical review, building on its previous work and integrating prompt history for more accurate results. 3. Memory Management: Integration with Pinecone allows for long-term memory storage, enabling context preservation and improved decision-making. 4. Multi-functionality: Capabilities include file manipulation, web browsing, and data retrieval, distinguishing AutoGPT from previous AI advancements by broadening its application scope.

Lior Alexander

808,154 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

Insane progress for small language models! MiniCPM5-2B is a dense 2B-parameter model by OpenBMB from China that's built for reasoning, coding, and tool use on resource-constrained hardware. The model specifically excels at coding and tool calling, two capabilities central to the shift from on-device LLMs to on-device agents. Instead of only answering prompts, it can use tools, generate code, carry information between steps, and complete multi-step tasks. I ran it 100% locally and connected it to a small investigation agent with one request: > Revenue dropped last week. Investigate what happened, quantify the impact, identify the likely cause, and produce an incident report with supporting evidence. The evidence was spread across orders, traffic, payments, refunds, and deployment logs. The model inspected the files, wrote its own queries, analyzed the intermediate results, and decided what to investigate next. Each tool result informed the next action, so the final report depended on the model maintaining a coherent investigation across the complete trajectory. The recording shows the actual task from beginning to end. It starts with the revenue question, follows the tool calls and supporting evidence, and ends with a quantified diagnosis and incident report. The data, tool execution, and model inference all remained on my machine. These capabilities were optimized through Agentic Pre-training, SFT, and large-scale RL. They do not come entirely from an application-level agent framework. MiniCPM5-2B supports SGLang, vLLM, llama(.)cpp, Ollama, iOS, Android, and HarmonyOS. OpenBMB has also released the model weights and parts of the training recipes and data resources behind it. Download MiniCPM5-2B: A 2B model can now maintain enough state to coordinate tools and complete a useful investigation on local hardware.
0:29

Insane progress for small language models! MiniCPM5-2B is a dense 2B-parameter model by OpenBMB from China that's built for reasoning, coding, and tool use on resource-constrained hardware. The model specifically excels at coding and tool calling, two capabilities central to the shift from on-device LLMs to on-device agents. Instead of only answering prompts, it can use tools, generate code, carry information between steps, and complete multi-step tasks. I ran it 100% locally and connected it to a small investigation agent with one request: > Revenue dropped last week. Investigate what happened, quantify the impact, identify the likely cause, and produce an incident report with supporting evidence. The evidence was spread across orders, traffic, payments, refunds, and deployment logs. The model inspected the files, wrote its own queries, analyzed the intermediate results, and decided what to investigate next. Each tool result informed the next action, so the final report depended on the model maintaining a coherent investigation across the complete trajectory. The recording shows the actual task from beginning to end. It starts with the revenue question, follows the tool calls and supporting evidence, and ends with a quantified diagnosis and incident report. The data, tool execution, and model inference all remained on my machine. These capabilities were optimized through Agentic Pre-training, SFT, and large-scale RL. They do not come entirely from an application-level agent framework. MiniCPM5-2B supports SGLang, vLLM, llama(.)cpp, Ollama, iOS, Android, and HarmonyOS. OpenBMB has also released the model weights and parts of the training recipes and data resources behind it. Download MiniCPM5-2B: A 2B model can now maintain enough state to coordinate tools and complete a useful investigation on local hardware.

Avi Chawla

14,272 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

Cerebras inference is very fast. So fast that it changes how we think about configuring our LLMs for voice agent use cases. Kimi K2.6 is a 1T parameter reasoning model that Cerebras serves at 650 - 1,000 tokens per second (end-to-end throughput), with time to first token metrics as low as 150ms (latency). These numbers are two to three times faster than other similarly capable models. The biggest lever we get from this kind of speed is that we can use the model in reasoning mode, and still have excellent "time to first non-thinking token." This solves a big pain point we have in 2026 for voice agent use cases. Almost all recent innovation in post-training has focused on making models good at reasoning ("test time compute"). This is great, but it makes the user-facing model latency much, much slower. Which is a problem for conversational voice agents. We can run Kimi K2.6 with reasoning turned on, and get responses faster than other models produce with reasoning disabled. On my 30-turn voice agent benchmark, Kimi K2.6 with reasoning enabled ties GPT 5.1 and Haiku 4.5 with reasoning disabled, and is still about 200ms seconds faster! On my primary task agent benchmark, Kimi K2.6 is now the #2 model. It ranks just behind Gemini 3.5 Flash in "high" reasoning mode, and tied with GLM 5, Sonnet 4.6, and GPT 5.4 with reasoning set to "low." But Kimi K2.6 completes each turn in the agent loop in under 500ms. The other four models are all at least 3x slower. (Models only qualify for this benchmark if they can complete task turns at a P50 <4s.) A couple of other things that this speed buys us, for production voice agents: - Tool calls happen fast enough that we don't have to work around tool call latency in our pipeline design. - We can prompt the model to output structured data at the beginning of a response, followed by plain text for voice generation. This opens up possibilities like asking the model to do complex classification/generation tasks that influence the rest of the pipeline. For example, the model could create a detailed style prompt for a steerable TTS model, for each individual conversation turn. And, of course, you can use Kimi K2.6 with reasoning turned off. Cerebras calls this "instant" mode. Here's a video of a Cerebras Kimi K2.6 voice agent with voice-to-voice response time, measured at the client, under 500ms. This is the true response latency as perceived by the user, including all network and audio codec overhead, transcription and turn detection, Kimi K2.6 token generation, and voice generation. 500ms is, effectively, instant. So the Cerebras naming for this mode is a propos. :-)
0:40

Cerebras inference is very fast. So fast that it changes how we think about configuring our LLMs for voice agent use cases. Kimi K2.6 is a 1T parameter reasoning model that Cerebras serves at 650 - 1,000 tokens per second (end-to-end throughput), with time to first token metrics as low as 150ms (latency). These numbers are two to three times faster than other similarly capable models. The biggest lever we get from this kind of speed is that we can use the model in reasoning mode, and still have excellent "time to first non-thinking token." This solves a big pain point we have in 2026 for voice agent use cases. Almost all recent innovation in post-training has focused on making models good at reasoning ("test time compute"). This is great, but it makes the user-facing model latency much, much slower. Which is a problem for conversational voice agents. We can run Kimi K2.6 with reasoning turned on, and get responses faster than other models produce with reasoning disabled. On my 30-turn voice agent benchmark, Kimi K2.6 with reasoning enabled ties GPT 5.1 and Haiku 4.5 with reasoning disabled, and is still about 200ms seconds faster! On my primary task agent benchmark, Kimi K2.6 is now the #2 model. It ranks just behind Gemini 3.5 Flash in "high" reasoning mode, and tied with GLM 5, Sonnet 4.6, and GPT 5.4 with reasoning set to "low." But Kimi K2.6 completes each turn in the agent loop in under 500ms. The other four models are all at least 3x slower. (Models only qualify for this benchmark if they can complete task turns at a P50 <4s.) A couple of other things that this speed buys us, for production voice agents: - Tool calls happen fast enough that we don't have to work around tool call latency in our pipeline design. - We can prompt the model to output structured data at the beginning of a response, followed by plain text for voice generation. This opens up possibilities like asking the model to do complex classification/generation tasks that influence the rest of the pipeline. For example, the model could create a detailed style prompt for a steerable TTS model, for each individual conversation turn. And, of course, you can use Kimi K2.6 with reasoning turned off. Cerebras calls this "instant" mode. Here's a video of a Cerebras Kimi K2.6 voice agent with voice-to-voice response time, measured at the client, under 500ms. This is the true response latency as perceived by the user, including all network and audio codec overhead, transcription and turn detection, Kimi K2.6 token generation, and voice generation. 500ms is, effectively, instant. So the Cerebras naming for this mode is a propos. :-)

kwindla

40,593 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Here is EVERY AI tool you need to be using in August 2026 I've personally used each for 100+ If you master them and use them all, you'll be a productivity MACHINE The list of the tools are down below. How to use each is in the video! • Best planning model: Fable 5 medium- smartest model out there. Use it to do all your ideation and planning • Best execution model: ChatGPT 5.6 sol medium- best bang for your buck. TONS of usage and incredibly smart • Best AI tool: ChatGPT Voice: the future of interfacing with technology • Best AI agent harness: ChatGPT Desktop app- can do anything any other AI agent can do, but does it better • Best model for building UI/UX/games: Claude Code w/ Claude Opus 5- this model gets a lot of hate. Some of it warranted, most of it not. NOTHING beats Opus 5 for UI • Local model: Qwen 3.6 27b on DGX Spark- best speed and intelligence ratio in local AI • Other must have tools: Buzz from Jack Dorsey. The future of AI is multiplayer, and this is the first true multiplayer AI platform out there
14:03

Here is EVERY AI tool you need to be using in August 2026 I've personally used each for 100+ If you master them and use them all, you'll be a productivity MACHINE The list of the tools are down below. How to use each is in the video! • Best planning model: Fable 5 medium- smartest model out there. Use it to do all your ideation and planning • Best execution model: ChatGPT 5.6 sol medium- best bang for your buck. TONS of usage and incredibly smart • Best AI tool: ChatGPT Voice: the future of interfacing with technology • Best AI agent harness: ChatGPT Desktop app- can do anything any other AI agent can do, but does it better • Best model for building UI/UX/games: Claude Code w/ Claude Opus 5- this model gets a lot of hate. Some of it warranted, most of it not. NOTHING beats Opus 5 for UI • Local model: Qwen 3.6 27b on DGX Spark- best speed and intelligence ratio in local AI • Other must have tools: Buzz from Jack Dorsey. The future of AI is multiplayer, and this is the first true multiplayer AI platform out there

Alex Finn

41,920 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

GPT-5.6 Pro is insane. It didn’t just beat Claude 5, Fable and Mythos. It crushed them. One prompt, just 5 minutes. And voila: A full low-poly Three.js island game with water, beach bar, boat, shark, fish, whales, sports area, NPCs and Ibiza vibes This is getting ridiculous. That is what I would write if I was not honest with you. That is what I would post if I only wanted a viral clickbait tweet. And this is exactly why you should always be careful with what you read on social media, especially on X. There is no GPT-5.6 yet. This prototype was made with GPT-5.5, in 6 iterations, after more than 40 minutes of back-and-forth with Codex. Yes, it started with one prompt, and I will share that prompt below. But the final result came from many corrections, adjustments, fixes, visual tweaks, Three.js issues, camera changes, object placement improvements, and a lot of manual direction. That is the real workflow. I share build in public content here to show what you can actually do with AI, but also to show that there is no magic dust. AI is powerful. Very powerful. But the difference between a cool demo and a real usable prototype is still iteration, feedback, taste, debugging, and direction. Yes, I am also waiting for GPT-5.6. It will probably arrive next week, and when it does, we will test it here properly, in public, with real prompts, real iterations, and real results.
0:22

GPT-5.6 Pro is insane. It didn’t just beat Claude 5, Fable and Mythos. It crushed them. One prompt, just 5 minutes. And voila: A full low-poly Three.js island game with water, beach bar, boat, shark, fish, whales, sports area, NPCs and Ibiza vibes This is getting ridiculous. That is what I would write if I was not honest with you. That is what I would post if I only wanted a viral clickbait tweet. And this is exactly why you should always be careful with what you read on social media, especially on X. There is no GPT-5.6 yet. This prototype was made with GPT-5.5, in 6 iterations, after more than 40 minutes of back-and-forth with Codex. Yes, it started with one prompt, and I will share that prompt below. But the final result came from many corrections, adjustments, fixes, visual tweaks, Three.js issues, camera changes, object placement improvements, and a lot of manual direction. That is the real workflow. I share build in public content here to show what you can actually do with AI, but also to show that there is no magic dust. AI is powerful. Very powerful. But the difference between a cool demo and a real usable prototype is still iteration, feedback, taste, debugging, and direction. Yes, I am also waiting for GPT-5.6. It will probably arrive next week, and when it does, we will test it here properly, in public, with real prompts, real iterations, and real results.

Givros

62,031 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

.OpenAI's GPT-5.1 is live in Cline. After testing the last several weeks, here's what we've found makes GPT-5.1 an exceptional model in Cline: GPT-5.1 is an obsessive researcher. It reads everything before writing anything. Where other models grab context and go, GPT-5.1 investigates thoroughly first, even for one-line changes. We found this overkill for simple tasks, and modified GPT-5.1's prompting resultantly, but a superpower when channeled right. Here's what you should expect from GPT-5.1 in Cline: > deep, systematic investigation before any edits > follows constraints religiously (specs, todo lists, your requirements) > maintains coherent reasoning with large contexts > delivers complete features with fewer corrections How we optimized Cline for GPT-5.1: 1. redesigned prompts for execution focus and stricter Plan/Act transitions 2. tightened tool specs, GPT-5.1 internalizes rules with just single examples 3. split /deep-planning investigation into two phases (read first, then search) Result: GPT-5.1 is a model that finishes what it starts, even across dozens of files and thousands of lines. Both GPT-5.1 (272K context) and GPT-5.1-codex (400K context) available now in Cline. $1.25/M input, $10/M output. Enable native tool calling in settings for best results. Use /deep-planning to see GPT-5.1 at its best. Full technical breakdown linked below.
0:35

.OpenAI's GPT-5.1 is live in Cline. After testing the last several weeks, here's what we've found makes GPT-5.1 an exceptional model in Cline: GPT-5.1 is an obsessive researcher. It reads everything before writing anything. Where other models grab context and go, GPT-5.1 investigates thoroughly first, even for one-line changes. We found this overkill for simple tasks, and modified GPT-5.1's prompting resultantly, but a superpower when channeled right. Here's what you should expect from GPT-5.1 in Cline: > deep, systematic investigation before any edits > follows constraints religiously (specs, todo lists, your requirements) > maintains coherent reasoning with large contexts > delivers complete features with fewer corrections How we optimized Cline for GPT-5.1: 1. redesigned prompts for execution focus and stricter Plan/Act transitions 2. tightened tool specs, GPT-5.1 internalizes rules with just single examples 3. split /deep-planning investigation into two phases (read first, then search) Result: GPT-5.1 is a model that finishes what it starts, even across dozens of files and thousands of lines. Both GPT-5.1 (272K context) and GPT-5.1-codex (400K context) available now in Cline. $1.25/M input, $10/M output. Enable native tool calling in settings for best results. Use /deep-planning to see GPT-5.1 at its best. Full technical breakdown linked below.

Cline

72,123 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

QVAC SDK 0.10.0 is now live, bringing advanced local compute capabilities and specialized hardware optimization directly to your device Key Features and Updates: - Image-to-Image Diffusion: Transform and edit images using simple prompts with 100% local compute—no cloud uploads or external servers required - Dynamic Tooling & KV Cache Management:Your local LLM now receives a tailored toolbox for every interaction, with automatic KV cache clearing to maintain high-speed inference - Doctor CLI: A new diagnostic tool that analyzes your hardware and memory, providing specific instructions on how to optimize your GPU for local AI - Suspend & Resume API: Specifically designed for mobile environments, this allows apps to pause P2P swarms and RAG workspaces to meet background rules without losing model state - GPT-OSS Compatibility: Added support for the latest GPT-OSS models loaded externally, expanding the range of open-source intelligence available on the platform Build the future of private, unstoppable AI:
1:11

QVAC SDK 0.10.0 is now live, bringing advanced local compute capabilities and specialized hardware optimization directly to your device Key Features and Updates: - Image-to-Image Diffusion: Transform and edit images using simple prompts with 100% local compute—no cloud uploads or external servers required - Dynamic Tooling & KV Cache Management:Your local LLM now receives a tailored toolbox for every interaction, with automatic KV cache clearing to maintain high-speed inference - Doctor CLI: A new diagnostic tool that analyzes your hardware and memory, providing specific instructions on how to optimize your GPU for local AI - Suspend & Resume API: Specifically designed for mobile environments, this allows apps to pause P2P swarms and RAG workspaces to meet background rules without losing model state - GPT-OSS Compatibility: Added support for the latest GPT-OSS models loaded externally, expanding the range of open-source intelligence available on the platform Build the future of private, unstoppable AI:

QVAC

34,508 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

I’ve been using GPT-5.6 Sol internally for the past two months, I've spent probably 25+ billion tokens. Here’s my review and comparison to Fable 5: > Let's start with the analogy because everyone seems to be giving theirs - GPT-5.6 is likely the last version of the GPT-5 training run series. It's kind of like an athlete at their peak. Through years of experience in the game, they've become the most reliable player and has the highest game IQ. But, there's no more room to grow. Fable on the other hand, being essentially the first version of a new training run, is the first round draft pick rookie. Raw talent mixed with the energy only a young person would have results in some incredible plays we didn't think possible, but also mistakes due to lack of experience. But that rookie will only improve and likely will be better than the veteran ever was because it's a new game and a new era. > GPT-5.6 is genuinely better at long, sustained work. With /goal, I've had it running complex projects for days with almost no intervention. It built a Minecraft-style game, kept adding features and mobs after the core game worked, and only stopped because I stopped the run. I never felt as though I had to jump in and guide it back to the right path. > It keeps finding useful work when you give it a concrete finish line. I had it recreate Excel with a loop. It inspected the real desktop excel app with Computer Use, comparing that against its own build, and closing the gaps. I stopped it after six days after it had built an incredible amount of functionality. > It's faster than other models in two different ways. The raw generation speed is higher, something OpenAI has been putting effort into. But it also takes a shorter path to solutions. It wanders less, changes less code, and generally knows how to get things done directly. In daily use, it feels about 2-3x times faster than Fable. That's my impression, not a controlled benchmark. The difference is large enough that I notice it constantly. > It works well across a wide range of tasks. I use it for one-line edits, quick questions, browser chores, and multi-day builds without changing my prompting style. Speaking of browser control, its the best ever I've used. To the point where I actually use it often. If a task lives on a website, GPT-5.6 usually opens the browser and does it there instead of asking for an API key or forcing everything through the terminal. When I switched back to GPT-5.5, it went straight to the command line even when the browser was clearly the better tool. > And it can handle real browser work, not just toy demos. During a data import, I had it monitor Supabase and resize instances as the load changed. It stayed on the dashboard, adjusted capacity, and checked the result without an API or a custom script. > I also gave it a full Google Workspace migration. It moved Forward Future from to preserved the old aliases, and configured MX, SPF, and DKIM. Before a consequential save, it stopped, explained exactly what would change, and waited for confirmation. > The reasoning setting matters a lot. Light is good for questions and small edits. High and Extra High are the sweet spots for serious work. Ultra usually takes longer than the extra thinking is worth and burns tokens. > I love that 5.6 is split into 3 sizes. Not only can you control speed and cost that way, but you still also have the thinking effort setting for each of them. Very precise controls. I just wish Codex automatically routed my prompts for me. > Its personality is blunt and a little bland. Claude feels warmer and more natural to talk to. GPT-5.6 is more clinical, but I like that for work. It gives me enough explanation and rarely pads the answer. I usually have to ask Fable to explain things more simply and/or more concise. > Its front-end taste has improved, but the default is predictable. Left alone, it turns websites into PowerPoint decks with huge statements and hard section breaks. The good news is that it takes design direction well and can revise without destroying the parts that already work. > It still makes confident mistakes. I asked it to rebuild parts of a system, and it told me the job was finished. Later, I found out it wasn't. Bits of its internal process also leak into the answer occasionally. > Claude Fable is more naturally autonomous on large, open-ended projects. GPT-5.6 is easier to reach for. I don't need to invent a huge project to justify using it. It works just as well for a small edit or browser chore. > GPT-5.6 is also cheaper. Sol costs $5 per million input tokens and $30 per million output tokens. Fable costs $10 and $50. Cached input is cheaper too. Still, cost per finished task matters more than cost per token. > GPT-5.6 isn't the best at everything, and it still needs supervision. But it generates faster, wanders less, works at almost any scale, and wastes less of my time. It's the model I have the most confidence in to get the job done right the first time. I put together a full breakdown with all the tests, prompts, and examples on a site. You can read it here:
7:46

I’ve been using GPT-5.6 Sol internally for the past two months, I've spent probably 25+ billion tokens. Here’s my review and comparison to Fable 5: > Let's start with the analogy because everyone seems to be giving theirs - GPT-5.6 is likely the last version of the GPT-5 training run series. It's kind of like an athlete at their peak. Through years of experience in the game, they've become the most reliable player and has the highest game IQ. But, there's no more room to grow. Fable on the other hand, being essentially the first version of a new training run, is the first round draft pick rookie. Raw talent mixed with the energy only a young person would have results in some incredible plays we didn't think possible, but also mistakes due to lack of experience. But that rookie will only improve and likely will be better than the veteran ever was because it's a new game and a new era. > GPT-5.6 is genuinely better at long, sustained work. With /goal, I've had it running complex projects for days with almost no intervention. It built a Minecraft-style game, kept adding features and mobs after the core game worked, and only stopped because I stopped the run. I never felt as though I had to jump in and guide it back to the right path. > It keeps finding useful work when you give it a concrete finish line. I had it recreate Excel with a loop. It inspected the real desktop excel app with Computer Use, comparing that against its own build, and closing the gaps. I stopped it after six days after it had built an incredible amount of functionality. > It's faster than other models in two different ways. The raw generation speed is higher, something OpenAI has been putting effort into. But it also takes a shorter path to solutions. It wanders less, changes less code, and generally knows how to get things done directly. In daily use, it feels about 2-3x times faster than Fable. That's my impression, not a controlled benchmark. The difference is large enough that I notice it constantly. > It works well across a wide range of tasks. I use it for one-line edits, quick questions, browser chores, and multi-day builds without changing my prompting style. Speaking of browser control, its the best ever I've used. To the point where I actually use it often. If a task lives on a website, GPT-5.6 usually opens the browser and does it there instead of asking for an API key or forcing everything through the terminal. When I switched back to GPT-5.5, it went straight to the command line even when the browser was clearly the better tool. > And it can handle real browser work, not just toy demos. During a data import, I had it monitor Supabase and resize instances as the load changed. It stayed on the dashboard, adjusted capacity, and checked the result without an API or a custom script. > I also gave it a full Google Workspace migration. It moved Forward Future from to preserved the old aliases, and configured MX, SPF, and DKIM. Before a consequential save, it stopped, explained exactly what would change, and waited for confirmation. > The reasoning setting matters a lot. Light is good for questions and small edits. High and Extra High are the sweet spots for serious work. Ultra usually takes longer than the extra thinking is worth and burns tokens. > I love that 5.6 is split into 3 sizes. Not only can you control speed and cost that way, but you still also have the thinking effort setting for each of them. Very precise controls. I just wish Codex automatically routed my prompts for me. > Its personality is blunt and a little bland. Claude feels warmer and more natural to talk to. GPT-5.6 is more clinical, but I like that for work. It gives me enough explanation and rarely pads the answer. I usually have to ask Fable to explain things more simply and/or more concise. > Its front-end taste has improved, but the default is predictable. Left alone, it turns websites into PowerPoint decks with huge statements and hard section breaks. The good news is that it takes design direction well and can revise without destroying the parts that already work. > It still makes confident mistakes. I asked it to rebuild parts of a system, and it told me the job was finished. Later, I found out it wasn't. Bits of its internal process also leak into the answer occasionally. > Claude Fable is more naturally autonomous on large, open-ended projects. GPT-5.6 is easier to reach for. I don't need to invent a huge project to justify using it. It works just as well for a small edit or browser chore. > GPT-5.6 is also cheaper. Sol costs $5 per million input tokens and $30 per million output tokens. Fable costs $10 and $50. Cached input is cheaper too. Still, cost per finished task matters more than cost per token. > GPT-5.6 isn't the best at everything, and it still needs supervision. But it generates faster, wanders less, works at almost any scale, and wastes less of my time. It's the model I have the most confidence in to get the job done right the first time. I put together a full breakdown with all the tests, prompts, and examples on a site. You can read it here:

Matthew Berman

188,148 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

GPT 5.6 SOL IS HERE! How to run your personal + business life with GPT 5.6 Sol + Codex (full 49 min masterclass) We tested it for 30 days and the video it's the CLEAREST look at the FUTURE of work: Here's what's possible once you set it up: 1. Your inbox becomes cards every morning, each with a summary and a reply drafted in your own voice. Y 2. Your Slack, meeting notes, and company updates can turn into one daily feed with a clear next action. It learns what you care about over time and rewrites its own prompts to get sharper. 3. You can give your agent its own email address, so your other tools and even your team's Slack bot email it directly and it just handles things. 4. You can have it watch you do a task once and turn it into a skill it repeats forever. 5. You can set a long goal and walk away. You can have it run for 20 hours straight, and fine-tune your own models, something that was out of reach for non-engineers 12 months ago. How to start: Open Codex, give it access to your computer, and ask it to suggest things it could do for you based on how you already work. Full episode on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 (thanks Dan Shipper for sharing your entire workflow and review of GPT 5.6) Start with one boring task, get it working, and build from there. You'll learn exactly how to make something similar. GPT 5.6 Sol is impressive. Sol (according to openAI benchmarks) is the best coding model out right now. It set a new state of the art on Terminal-Bench 2.1 at 88.8%, and its "ultra mode" hits 91.9%, beating Claude Opus 4.8, Fable 5, and even Mythos 5 this masterclass is 100% free, like always. For more The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 Watch
49:16

GPT 5.6 SOL IS HERE! How to run your personal + business life with GPT 5.6 Sol + Codex (full 49 min masterclass) We tested it for 30 days and the video it's the CLEAREST look at the FUTURE of work: Here's what's possible once you set it up: 1. Your inbox becomes cards every morning, each with a summary and a reply drafted in your own voice. Y 2. Your Slack, meeting notes, and company updates can turn into one daily feed with a clear next action. It learns what you care about over time and rewrites its own prompts to get sharper. 3. You can give your agent its own email address, so your other tools and even your team's Slack bot email it directly and it just handles things. 4. You can have it watch you do a task once and turn it into a skill it repeats forever. 5. You can set a long goal and walk away. You can have it run for 20 hours straight, and fine-tune your own models, something that was out of reach for non-engineers 12 months ago. How to start: Open Codex, give it access to your computer, and ask it to suggest things it could do for you based on how you already work. Full episode on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 (thanks Dan Shipper for sharing your entire workflow and review of GPT 5.6) Start with one boring task, get it working, and build from there. You'll learn exactly how to make something similar. GPT 5.6 Sol is impressive. Sol (according to openAI benchmarks) is the best coding model out right now. It set a new state of the art on Terminal-Bench 2.1 at 88.8%, and its "ultra mode" hits 91.9%, beating Claude Opus 4.8, Fable 5, and even Mythos 5 this masterclass is 100% free, like always. For more The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 Watch

GREG ISENBERG

156,484 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

I took Clicky and I made it 5x Faster So I saw that Farza 🇵🇰🇺🇸 was using uses Claude's vision to find UI elements on screen, send a screenshot, wait for coordinates back. It works, but it's slow. I replaced that with OmniParser V2 by Microsoft which is a local Object detection model trained specifically on UI elements. It runs on-device, detects every button, menu, and icon in 400ms, and gives me pixel-precise coordinates. No API call, no latency, no cost. The green highlights you see around the UI elements is the detection overlay and you can see as I am switching the screen it takes no time to detect and highlight which is pretty neat! With Local models improving by the day, Its the right direction for applications like these. Next up: video-synced tutorials where a YouTube tutorial pauses and waits for you to perform each action in the real app. I am not stopping!
2:53

I took Clicky and I made it 5x Faster So I saw that Farza 🇵🇰🇺🇸 was using uses Claude's vision to find UI elements on screen, send a screenshot, wait for coordinates back. It works, but it's slow. I replaced that with OmniParser V2 by Microsoft which is a local Object detection model trained specifically on UI elements. It runs on-device, detects every button, menu, and icon in 400ms, and gives me pixel-precise coordinates. No API call, no latency, no cost. The green highlights you see around the UI elements is the detection overlay and you can see as I am switching the screen it takes no time to detect and highlight which is pretty neat! With Local models improving by the day, Its the right direction for applications like these. Next up: video-synced tutorials where a YouTube tutorial pauses and waits for you to perform each action in the real app. I am not stopping!

Milind S

73,349 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

As promised, I built a small local RAG agent to demonstrate how Model Context Protocol (𝐌𝐂𝐏) works in practice when connecting LLMs to tools and data. The agent can read, search, and list my notes; but the functionality itself isn’t the point, the protocol is. Instead of writing Gemini specific tool integrations, I connected the model to an 𝐌𝐂𝐏 server. This is why 𝐌𝐂𝐏 is highly relevant for production AI systems: • 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: one protocol instead of custom connectors per data source. • 𝐏𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲: the same MCP server works with Gemini, Claude, or any MCP compliant client. • 𝐒𝐚𝐟𝐞𝐭𝐲: models can only access explicitly exposed capabilities. 𝐌𝐂𝐏 shifts agent development from integration heavy to capability driven. Demo link in the first comment.
0:36

As promised, I built a small local RAG agent to demonstrate how Model Context Protocol (𝐌𝐂𝐏) works in practice when connecting LLMs to tools and data. The agent can read, search, and list my notes; but the functionality itself isn’t the point, the protocol is. Instead of writing Gemini specific tool integrations, I connected the model to an 𝐌𝐂𝐏 server. This is why 𝐌𝐂𝐏 is highly relevant for production AI systems: • 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: one protocol instead of custom connectors per data source. • 𝐏𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲: the same MCP server works with Gemini, Claude, or any MCP compliant client. • 𝐒𝐚𝐟𝐞𝐭𝐲: models can only access explicitly exposed capabilities. 𝐌𝐂𝐏 shifts agent development from integration heavy to capability driven. Demo link in the first comment.

Sui_Builds

12,853 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

BREAKING: GPT-5.6 Sol is out—AND Codex has been merged into ChatGPT Desktop as ChatGPT Codex. This combo model and desktop app harness are the gold-standard for knowledge work in AI. 5.6 is powerful, fast, half the price of Fable, and my default for almost everything. We’ve been testing it internally Every 🪨 for about a month across coding, writing, design, and knowledge work. Here’s our day-zero vibe check: - An A-tier coder—but it’s not Fable. Sol scored 56/100 on our Senior Engineer benchmark compared to a 91 for Fable. I think the 56/100 undersells it, it's an excellent implementor, and very smart. But Fable just writes conceptually cleaner code and works better at the top end of task complexity. PRO-TIP: Use GPT-5.6 as Fable's subagent for the most goated combo in AI coding. - The best writer of the frontier models. It’s clearer and more concise than Fable or Opus 4.8, without the overexplaining or weird private language. It can one-shot marketing emails, help you workshop taglines, and explain complex concepts clearly. It's also super fast, which makes it easy to collaborate with. - Design is better, but not top-tier. It has noticeably more taste than 5.5, but Fable and Opus 4.8 are still playing at a different level. See examples in the video and vibe check below. - The real leap is knowledge work. Sol is the first model I’ve trusted to run whole loops of knowledge work—not just help with individual tasks. I use it to process email, surface decisions from meetings and Slack, find job candidates, scan Facebook Marketplace for furniture, and log my meals. It has shifted my job from doing the work to tending the system that does it. - The merged app is fine. I was extremely worried about this because I love the Codex app. OpenAI was caught in an interesting position: How to make an agent orchestration app for regular ChatGPT consumers, coders, and businesses all in one app. They now split the interface between ChatGPT Work and ChatGPT Codex. They're basically the same except Work hides code. And "Chat" has been demoted to 2nd tier status for quick questions in either one. It's not a big leap, but it's not a huge setback either. And it remains my favorite of the desktop agent orchestration apps. Verdict: If I really had to put my finger on it, I'd say Fable has way more big model smell. But that means it's a skill in itself to get value out of it—99% of people are still not there yet. GPT-5.6 is almost as powerful, but is easy to use, fast, and relatively cheap. It should give you an early sense of where model work is going. Full Every 🪨 Vibe Check:
13:34

BREAKING: GPT-5.6 Sol is out—AND Codex has been merged into ChatGPT Desktop as ChatGPT Codex. This combo model and desktop app harness are the gold-standard for knowledge work in AI. 5.6 is powerful, fast, half the price of Fable, and my default for almost everything. We’ve been testing it internally Every 🪨 for about a month across coding, writing, design, and knowledge work. Here’s our day-zero vibe check: - An A-tier coder—but it’s not Fable. Sol scored 56/100 on our Senior Engineer benchmark compared to a 91 for Fable. I think the 56/100 undersells it, it's an excellent implementor, and very smart. But Fable just writes conceptually cleaner code and works better at the top end of task complexity. PRO-TIP: Use GPT-5.6 as Fable's subagent for the most goated combo in AI coding. - The best writer of the frontier models. It’s clearer and more concise than Fable or Opus 4.8, without the overexplaining or weird private language. It can one-shot marketing emails, help you workshop taglines, and explain complex concepts clearly. It's also super fast, which makes it easy to collaborate with. - Design is better, but not top-tier. It has noticeably more taste than 5.5, but Fable and Opus 4.8 are still playing at a different level. See examples in the video and vibe check below. - The real leap is knowledge work. Sol is the first model I’ve trusted to run whole loops of knowledge work—not just help with individual tasks. I use it to process email, surface decisions from meetings and Slack, find job candidates, scan Facebook Marketplace for furniture, and log my meals. It has shifted my job from doing the work to tending the system that does it. - The merged app is fine. I was extremely worried about this because I love the Codex app. OpenAI was caught in an interesting position: How to make an agent orchestration app for regular ChatGPT consumers, coders, and businesses all in one app. They now split the interface between ChatGPT Work and ChatGPT Codex. They're basically the same except Work hides code. And "Chat" has been demoted to 2nd tier status for quick questions in either one. It's not a big leap, but it's not a huge setback either. And it remains my favorite of the desktop agent orchestration apps. Verdict: If I really had to put my finger on it, I'd say Fable has way more big model smell. But that means it's a skill in itself to get value out of it—99% of people are still not there yet. GPT-5.6 is almost as powerful, but is easy to use, fast, and relatively cheap. It should give you an early sense of where model work is going. Full Every 🪨 Vibe Check:

Dan Shipper

146,074 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce