Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Annie Rauwerda has built a career exploring Wikipedia’s weirdest corners 🌐 The creator of Depths of Wikipedia says, “If Wikipedia is worth anything at all, it’s because of the citations.” She’s had a “simultaneous love affair with the Internet Archive and Wikipedia” as she embraces the spirit of the...

internetarchive's profile picture

Internet Archive

457,704 subscribers

68,433 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

KunstBildungWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Annie Rauwerda, creator of Depths of Wikipedia, lives for the internet’s weirdest footnotes. That includes things like the long-gone Garfield the cat “G-Mail,” 🙀📬 a very real web oddity now preserved only on the #WaybackMachine. Internet history is stranger—and more fragile—than it looks. Read more 👉 Annie? Rauwerda? depths of wikipedia! #DepthsofWikipedia The Wayback Machine #Wikipedia Internet Archive
0:28

Annie Rauwerda, creator of Depths of Wikipedia, lives for the internet’s weirdest footnotes. That includes things like the long-gone Garfield the cat “G-Mail,” 🙀📬 a very real web oddity now preserved only on the #WaybackMachine. Internet history is stranger—and more fragile—than it looks. Read more 👉 Annie? Rauwerda? depths of wikipedia! #DepthsofWikipedia The Wayback Machine #Wikipedia Internet Archive

Internet Archive

39,451 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Larry Sanger built Wikipedia as an unbiased repository of the world’s knowledge, and then stood helplessly by as activists and intel agencies turned it into the most comprehensive propaganda op in human history. There’s nothing more corrupt. (0:00) The Origins of Wikipedia (4:27) Wikipedia’s Dangerous Policy Changes (14:01) Who Is Responsible for Corrupting Wikipedia? (17:47) Why Did Sanger Leave Wikipedia? (19:29) Who Is Wikipedia Co-Creator Jimmy Wales? (23:43) What Does the “Tucker Carlson” Wikipedia Page Say? (27:39) How Does Wikipedia Actually Work? (28:43) How Wikipedia Blacklists Conservatives (37:28) Is Wikipedia Controlled by the Intel Agencies? (40:16) Sanger’s Request to Elon Musk and Donald Trump to Help Fix Wikipedia (49:43) Are Wikipedia Editors Being Secretly Paid to Push Propaganda? (56:06) Wikipedia’s Dark Alliance With Google (1:01:41) How Wikipedia Can Be Saved (1:07:22) Which News Sources Are Blacklisted by Wikipedia? (1:17:29) Why Don’t We Know Who’s Editing Wikipedia? (1:19:53) Should Wikipedia Users Be Able to Rate Articles? (1:22:01) Why Wikipedia Should End Permanent Bans (1:27:16) This Is How to Bring Reform to Wikipedia Includes paid partnerships.
1:32:46

Larry Sanger built Wikipedia as an unbiased repository of the world’s knowledge, and then stood helplessly by as activists and intel agencies turned it into the most comprehensive propaganda op in human history. There’s nothing more corrupt. (0:00) The Origins of Wikipedia (4:27) Wikipedia’s Dangerous Policy Changes (14:01) Who Is Responsible for Corrupting Wikipedia? (17:47) Why Did Sanger Leave Wikipedia? (19:29) Who Is Wikipedia Co-Creator Jimmy Wales? (23:43) What Does the “Tucker Carlson” Wikipedia Page Say? (27:39) How Does Wikipedia Actually Work? (28:43) How Wikipedia Blacklists Conservatives (37:28) Is Wikipedia Controlled by the Intel Agencies? (40:16) Sanger’s Request to Elon Musk and Donald Trump to Help Fix Wikipedia (49:43) Are Wikipedia Editors Being Secretly Paid to Push Propaganda? (56:06) Wikipedia’s Dark Alliance With Google (1:01:41) How Wikipedia Can Be Saved (1:07:22) Which News Sources Are Blacklisted by Wikipedia? (1:17:29) Why Don’t We Know Who’s Editing Wikipedia? (1:19:53) Should Wikipedia Users Be Able to Rate Articles? (1:22:01) Why Wikipedia Should End Permanent Bans (1:27:16) This Is How to Bring Reform to Wikipedia Includes paid partnerships.

Tucker Carlson

3,860,420 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Wikipedia has turned into “an engine of defamation,” says Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger Larry Sanger. “Wikipedia now has a list of what they call ‘perennial sources,’ and it functions as a blacklist. And according to this list, you simply may not cite—may not use as sources of Wikipedia articles—anything that has been branded as ‘right-wing.’ …The Epoch Times, for example…is colored red on this list.”
1:23

Wikipedia has turned into “an engine of defamation,” says Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger Larry Sanger. “Wikipedia now has a list of what they call ‘perennial sources,’ and it functions as a blacklist. And according to this list, you simply may not cite—may not use as sources of Wikipedia articles—anything that has been branded as ‘right-wing.’ …The Epoch Times, for example…is colored red on this list.”

Jan Jekielek

15,588 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

What did you read on Wikipedia this year? From politics to pop culture, your most searched pages are a reflection of what mattered to the world in 2024. In the first ten months of the year, English Wikipedia alone received over 76 billion views. Watch to find out the most read English Wikipedia articles of 2024. Learn more ➡️ #WikipediaYearInReview 🔊 Loyalty Freak Music, CC0
0:50

What did you read on Wikipedia this year? From politics to pop culture, your most searched pages are a reflection of what mattered to the world in 2024. In the first ten months of the year, English Wikipedia alone received over 76 billion views. Watch to find out the most read English Wikipedia articles of 2024. Learn more ➡️ #WikipediaYearInReview 🔊 Loyalty Freak Music, CC0

Wikipedia

30,675 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“Wikipedia is one of the controlling institutions of modern civilization.” Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger says the platform has become a vehicle for propaganda. “One of the left-wing theorists’ explicitly stated goals… is they need to march through the institutions.” “Essentially capture education, government, media, the churches, and so forth.” “Each of these institutions has been, to a greater or lesser extent, systematically, carefully, strategically infiltrated by the left.” “Wikipedia is one of those, insofar as Wikipedia sort of represents what we are all expected to believe, at least from an establishment point of view.” Larry Sanger
1:11

“Wikipedia is one of the controlling institutions of modern civilization.” Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger says the platform has become a vehicle for propaganda. “One of the left-wing theorists’ explicitly stated goals… is they need to march through the institutions.” “Essentially capture education, government, media, the churches, and so forth.” “Each of these institutions has been, to a greater or lesser extent, systematically, carefully, strategically infiltrated by the left.” “Wikipedia is one of those, insofar as Wikipedia sort of represents what we are all expected to believe, at least from an establishment point of view.” Larry Sanger

Jan Jekielek

14,768 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇺🇸 Wikipedia co-founder: “Wikipedia is leftist propaganda” Larry Sanger now he feels bitter disappointment in Wikipedia: “For the first 5 years or so, Wikipedia honestly tried to remain neutral, but then began a long and slow slide towards what I call leftist propaganda. It's a strong statement, I understand, but at least the political content on Wikipedia nowadays is of that kind. And this happened because in the last 10-15 years Wikipedia has strictly followed the course of the media, getting rid of all other sources from which it draws information. First it got rid of blogs, and in the last 10 years almost all conservative information resources. And since the media themselves, as well as the political establishment, have tilted to the left, Wikipedia followed them. Ten years ago it would have been hard for me to believe in the possibility of such drastic changes. But by around 2010 the slide to the left had already begun.”
1:39

🇺🇸 Wikipedia co-founder: “Wikipedia is leftist propaganda” Larry Sanger now he feels bitter disappointment in Wikipedia: “For the first 5 years or so, Wikipedia honestly tried to remain neutral, but then began a long and slow slide towards what I call leftist propaganda. It's a strong statement, I understand, but at least the political content on Wikipedia nowadays is of that kind. And this happened because in the last 10-15 years Wikipedia has strictly followed the course of the media, getting rid of all other sources from which it draws information. First it got rid of blogs, and in the last 10 years almost all conservative information resources. And since the media themselves, as well as the political establishment, have tilted to the left, Wikipedia followed them. Ten years ago it would have been hard for me to believe in the possibility of such drastic changes. But by around 2010 the slide to the left had already begun.”

Lord Bebo

17,393 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Tucker Carlson: "Wikipedia is a propaganda operation, and one of its founders told me that the CIA or the American intel community is heavily involved in shaping the message on Wikipedia"
0:35

Tucker Carlson: "Wikipedia is a propaganda operation, and one of its founders told me that the CIA or the American intel community is heavily involved in shaping the message on Wikipedia"

Thomas Sowell Quotes

16,828 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Congress is demanding information on users posting "anti-Israel information" on Wikipedia, threatening the anonymity of the Wikipedia volunteer editors in order to shield Israel. Glenn Greenwald on the growing threats to a free internet:
6:59

Congress is demanding information on users posting "anti-Israel information" on Wikipedia, threatening the anonymity of the Wikipedia volunteer editors in order to shield Israel. Glenn Greenwald on the growing threats to a free internet:

System Update

119,923 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

EXCLUSIVE: Katherine Maher says that she abandoned a "free and open" internet as the mission of Wikipedia, because those principles recapitulated a "white male Westernized construct" and "did not end up living into the intentionality of what openness can be."
1:23

EXCLUSIVE: Katherine Maher says that she abandoned a "free and open" internet as the mission of Wikipedia, because those principles recapitulated a "white male Westernized construct" and "did not end up living into the intentionality of what openness can be."

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️

18,095,930 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

This is the founder of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger, who was recently interviewed by Tucker Carlson In response to my post questioning why he is repeating ADL’s talking points about Wikipedia’s editing on Israel’s genocide, he claims I’m blaming the “Jooos” I never said anything about the “Jooos” or Jews. The fact that you are trying to make it about antisemitism, confirms my suspicions that you are in fact lobbying on the side of entities like the ADL & Israel. You mentioned the ADL 1 time in your interview and only in the context of complaining that the genocidal Israeli POV is underrepresented on Wikipedia. ADL and Israel have a documented history of manipulating Wikipedia. Naftali Bennett, the former Prime Minister of Israel is on record explaining how they train Wikipedia editors to ensure Wikipedia is “Zionist in nature”. Last year, Wikipedia editors finally attempted to make entries about Israel’s genocide of Palestinians reflective of the facts that the whole world witnessed, they also moved to ban ADL as a reliable source on Israel/Palestine and on antisemitism since ADL uses the bogus IHRA definition which makes criticism of Israel and bible references, antisemitic. In retaliation, ADL & Ashley Rinsberg (also a Zionist) made up bogus claims about 30-40 Muslims making Wikipedia “Pro-Hamas”. Then you went on Tucker Carlson and made the same claims and suggested Israeli Intelligence should launch a campaign to manipulate Wikipedia. You are either clueless or a fraud with an alternative agenda who is using conservative outrage at years of CIA and Israeli intelligence manipulation of Wikipedia to further your goal of censoring Wikipedia to favor Israel & Zionism.
4:46

This is the founder of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger, who was recently interviewed by Tucker Carlson In response to my post questioning why he is repeating ADL’s talking points about Wikipedia’s editing on Israel’s genocide, he claims I’m blaming the “Jooos” I never said anything about the “Jooos” or Jews. The fact that you are trying to make it about antisemitism, confirms my suspicions that you are in fact lobbying on the side of entities like the ADL & Israel. You mentioned the ADL 1 time in your interview and only in the context of complaining that the genocidal Israeli POV is underrepresented on Wikipedia. ADL and Israel have a documented history of manipulating Wikipedia. Naftali Bennett, the former Prime Minister of Israel is on record explaining how they train Wikipedia editors to ensure Wikipedia is “Zionist in nature”. Last year, Wikipedia editors finally attempted to make entries about Israel’s genocide of Palestinians reflective of the facts that the whole world witnessed, they also moved to ban ADL as a reliable source on Israel/Palestine and on antisemitism since ADL uses the bogus IHRA definition which makes criticism of Israel and bible references, antisemitic. In retaliation, ADL & Ashley Rinsberg (also a Zionist) made up bogus claims about 30-40 Muslims making Wikipedia “Pro-Hamas”. Then you went on Tucker Carlson and made the same claims and suggested Israeli Intelligence should launch a campaign to manipulate Wikipedia. You are either clueless or a fraud with an alternative agenda who is using conservative outrage at years of CIA and Israeli intelligence manipulation of Wikipedia to further your goal of censoring Wikipedia to favor Israel & Zionism.

GenXGirl

31,350 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

ADL IS BEHIND THE CENSORSHIP CAMPAIGN AGAINST WIKIPEDIA In 2024, Wikipedia banned the ADL & ADL is trying to censor Wikipedia in retaliation. 2 days ago, everyone was (correctly) posting about ADL’s censorship. Then Tucker Carlson interviews Larry Sanger who sells ADL’s talking points to include suggesting Israel intelligence should manipulate Wikipedia and today, everyone is clapping for censorship of Wikipedia. FFS, who do you think has been controlling the narrative in Wikipedia since 2010?!? This ignorance is why we stab ourselves in the chest over and over again.
1:57

ADL IS BEHIND THE CENSORSHIP CAMPAIGN AGAINST WIKIPEDIA In 2024, Wikipedia banned the ADL & ADL is trying to censor Wikipedia in retaliation. 2 days ago, everyone was (correctly) posting about ADL’s censorship. Then Tucker Carlson interviews Larry Sanger who sells ADL’s talking points to include suggesting Israel intelligence should manipulate Wikipedia and today, everyone is clapping for censorship of Wikipedia. FFS, who do you think has been controlling the narrative in Wikipedia since 2010?!? This ignorance is why we stab ourselves in the chest over and over again.

GenXGirl

98,976 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Tucker Carlson: "Wikipedia is a propaganda operation, and one of its founders told me that the CIA or the American intel community is heavily involved in shaping the message on Wikipedia." That's why we need Grokipedia.
0:35

Tucker Carlson: "Wikipedia is a propaganda operation, and one of its founders told me that the CIA or the American intel community is heavily involved in shaping the message on Wikipedia." That's why we need Grokipedia.

Defiant L’s

28,087 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸 LARRY SANGER: I’M ORGANIZING A LETTER OF PROTEST AGAINST WIKIPEDIA Wikipedia Co-Founder, Larry Sanger: “I’m going to set up a letter of protest, not a petition, and circulate it among prominent people who’ve been wronged by Wikipedia... It’s increasingly necessary to make noise at Congress and the Wikimedia Foundation. Many people who’ve been bad-mouthed by Wikipedia would sign such a letter.” Source: Jan Jekielek
3:00

🚨🇺🇸 LARRY SANGER: I’M ORGANIZING A LETTER OF PROTEST AGAINST WIKIPEDIA Wikipedia Co-Founder, Larry Sanger: “I’m going to set up a letter of protest, not a petition, and circulate it among prominent people who’ve been wronged by Wikipedia... It’s increasingly necessary to make noise at Congress and the Wikimedia Foundation. Many people who’ve been bad-mouthed by Wikipedia would sign such a letter.” Source: Jan Jekielek

Mario Nawfal

80,665 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

TUNE IN: Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales calls Grokipedia a "ridiculous idea" that "will never work." Wales: "One of our core values at Wikipedia is neutrality… The idea that we've become somehow 'Wokepidea' is just not true." Q: "And on the competition between Wikipedia and Grokipedia?" Wales: "There's no competition!"
1:39

TUNE IN: Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales calls Grokipedia a "ridiculous idea" that "will never work." Wales: "One of our core values at Wikipedia is neutrality… The idea that we've become somehow 'Wokepidea' is just not true." Q: "And on the competition between Wikipedia and Grokipedia?" Wales: "There's no competition!"

Resist the Mainstream

621,913 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This is why it’s such a huge deal that Wikipedia is Woke and full of bias leftist propaganda Wikipedia is one of the most cited sources for AI. It’s a top source by Google Search, Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Anthropic's Claude, Perplexity, Siri, Alexa and more Multiple studies show it accounts for a huge portion of citations in AI models, as many as 27% in some ChatGPT analyses It gets even worse, Google frequently places Wikipedia at the top of results, in Knowledge Panels, and in AI summaries for a vast majority of informational and topic searches Co-founder Larry Sanger has publicly stated the site has a significant left-leaning bias It’s horrifying to think that this much information from woke Wikipedia is being pulled by AI and used in their outputs This is so serious that we need intervention At the very least we need Search engines & AI diversification Google, Perplexity, ChatGPT, Claude and everyone else should reduce reliance on Wikipedia as a primary source and pull from a wider range of reputable references Wikipedia is not even close to being neutral on many topics
3:06

This is why it’s such a huge deal that Wikipedia is Woke and full of bias leftist propaganda Wikipedia is one of the most cited sources for AI. It’s a top source by Google Search, Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Anthropic's Claude, Perplexity, Siri, Alexa and more Multiple studies show it accounts for a huge portion of citations in AI models, as many as 27% in some ChatGPT analyses It gets even worse, Google frequently places Wikipedia at the top of results, in Knowledge Panels, and in AI summaries for a vast majority of informational and topic searches Co-founder Larry Sanger has publicly stated the site has a significant left-leaning bias It’s horrifying to think that this much information from woke Wikipedia is being pulled by AI and used in their outputs This is so serious that we need intervention At the very least we need Search engines & AI diversification Google, Perplexity, ChatGPT, Claude and everyone else should reduce reliance on Wikipedia as a primary source and pull from a wider range of reputable references Wikipedia is not even close to being neutral on many topics

Wall Street Apes

21,630 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

‘CIA and FBI have edited a number of articles’ in the past — Larry Sanger, Wikipedia cofounder Such meddling dates back to 2007 Corporations and other entities engage in similar manipulations since Wikipedia is open to the public
1:06

‘CIA and FBI have edited a number of articles’ in the past — Larry Sanger, Wikipedia cofounder Such meddling dates back to 2007 Corporations and other entities engage in similar manipulations since Wikipedia is open to the public

RT

19,796 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

WIKIPEDIA CO-FOUNDER: IT HAS BECOME A LEFTIST PROPAGANDA SITE Larry Sanger: “Wikipedia made a real effort at neutrality for, I would say, its first 5 years or so. And then it began a long, slow slide into what I would call leftist propaganda. As the news media has shifted, and as the establishment has shifted more to the left, the content of Wikipedia has followed suit.” Source: End Wokeness, Larry Sanger
1:40

WIKIPEDIA CO-FOUNDER: IT HAS BECOME A LEFTIST PROPAGANDA SITE Larry Sanger: “Wikipedia made a real effort at neutrality for, I would say, its first 5 years or so. And then it began a long, slow slide into what I would call leftist propaganda. As the news media has shifted, and as the establishment has shifted more to the left, the content of Wikipedia has followed suit.” Source: End Wokeness, Larry Sanger

Mario Nawfal

4,033,733 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The left is what Wikipedia sees the world through. You can get a sense of what it what it would look like to change that lens if you go to Grokipedia. If you take the same article on Wikipedia and Grokipedia, they're gonna look really different. Even if you disagree with what's written on Grokipedia and agree with what is on Wikipedia, you're still gonna see that there are two ways to present the issue and Wikipedia is not the way. It's not neutral. (Ashley Rindsberg // The Free Press)
0:50

The left is what Wikipedia sees the world through. You can get a sense of what it what it would look like to change that lens if you go to Grokipedia. If you take the same article on Wikipedia and Grokipedia, they're gonna look really different. Even if you disagree with what's written on Grokipedia and agree with what is on Wikipedia, you're still gonna see that there are two ways to present the issue and Wikipedia is not the way. It's not neutral. (Ashley Rindsberg // The Free Press)

Katie Miller

634,066 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

NEW INVESTIGATION: New York Times Bestselling author and journalist Max Lugavere has endured a sustained reputation attack on Wikipedia. In an interview, Max tells NPOV's Ashley Rindsberg how the Wikipedia attack damaged his reputation and turned his life's work—researching ways to prevent the dementia that took his mother's life—into malicious accusations. NPOV's investigation reveals a deeply coordinated network of editors called "the Skeptics" that works on Wikipedia as a coordinated editing group known as Guerrilla Skeptics on Wikipedia (GSOW). + The opening of the Wikipedia entry falsely labels Max an "anti-vegan activist." This now appears prominently on Google searches on Max. + Carefully curated film reviews are used to indirectly accuse Max of attempting to profit from his mother's disease and tragic death. + The key elements of the attack rely on articles written by two members of a center at McGill University known as the Office for Science and Society (OSS). + The main editor on Max's entry adds content from OSS figures, whose own entries on Wikipedia were created and/or currently controlled by GSOW editor Robincantin. + Susan Gerbic, a contributor to Skeptical Inquirer magazine and a fellow of the NGO that owns the magazine, has identified one Robin Cantin as "my editor." + Gerbic is founder of the Guerrilla Skeptics on Wikipedia project. Watch the NPOV video here👇 For the full NPOV investigation, see the link in thread.
1:21

NEW INVESTIGATION: New York Times Bestselling author and journalist Max Lugavere has endured a sustained reputation attack on Wikipedia. In an interview, Max tells NPOV's Ashley Rindsberg how the Wikipedia attack damaged his reputation and turned his life's work—researching ways to prevent the dementia that took his mother's life—into malicious accusations. NPOV's investigation reveals a deeply coordinated network of editors called "the Skeptics" that works on Wikipedia as a coordinated editing group known as Guerrilla Skeptics on Wikipedia (GSOW). + The opening of the Wikipedia entry falsely labels Max an "anti-vegan activist." This now appears prominently on Google searches on Max. + Carefully curated film reviews are used to indirectly accuse Max of attempting to profit from his mother's disease and tragic death. + The key elements of the attack rely on articles written by two members of a center at McGill University known as the Office for Science and Society (OSS). + The main editor on Max's entry adds content from OSS figures, whose own entries on Wikipedia were created and/or currently controlled by GSOW editor Robincantin. + Susan Gerbic, a contributor to Skeptical Inquirer magazine and a fellow of the NGO that owns the magazine, has identified one Robin Cantin as "my editor." + Gerbic is founder of the Guerrilla Skeptics on Wikipedia project. Watch the NPOV video here👇 For the full NPOV investigation, see the link in thread.

NPOV

48,802 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Perplexity’s mission is to cater to the world's curiosity. We have taken inspiration from Wikipedia with citations. We’re excited to take it further by launching Pages, best described as “AI Wikipedia.” The effort of analyzing sources and synthesizing a readable page is now possible with a simple “one-click convert.” Available for all Pro users, and rolling out more widely to everyone.
0:54

Perplexity’s mission is to cater to the world's curiosity. We have taken inspiration from Wikipedia with citations. We’re excited to take it further by launching Pages, best described as “AI Wikipedia.” The effort of analyzing sources and synthesizing a readable page is now possible with a simple “one-click convert.” Available for all Pro users, and rolling out more widely to everyone.

Aravind Srinivas

498,160 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren