Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Another instance of #HarryMarkle speaking for #PrinceWilliam about personal things without his permission. Exploiting Diana’s memory and dragging his brother into it. I mean, let’s face it-the only interesting things about Harry are who is family is-his mother, his brother, his grandmother, his father. Without that he’s just a...

unreMARKLEble's profile picture

Princess CarParkle 👑

23,865 subscribers

44,919 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNews & Politics#HarryMarkle#PrinceWilliam
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

This is a damaged, damaged man-child. I believe he’s emotionally stunted at age 12, and the depths of Harry’s denial is shocking. That denial bleeds into all corners of his life, even currently. Harry has said repeatedly his mother was “murdered”, however, at the very least if she’d been wearing her seatbelt and at the very most had she kept her UK protection, the conversations we would be having would be very different. #MeghanMarkle wouldn’t be a thing, Diana would have NEVER stood for that and would’ve seen right thru her. Harry wouldn’t need to be mothered so Markle couldn’t have used that manipulation and preyed on his grief & vulnerabilities as far as the loss of his mother went. Diana got into a shocks with a drunk driver and didn’t wear her seatbelt. That’s not murder, that’s poor choices. #FOHarry #FOHarryandMeghan #MeghanMarkleIsABully #HarryAndMeghan #PrincessDiana #GoHomeHarry
0:42

This is a damaged, damaged man-child. I believe he’s emotionally stunted at age 12, and the depths of Harry’s denial is shocking. That denial bleeds into all corners of his life, even currently. Harry has said repeatedly his mother was “murdered”, however, at the very least if she’d been wearing her seatbelt and at the very most had she kept her UK protection, the conversations we would be having would be very different. #MeghanMarkle wouldn’t be a thing, Diana would have NEVER stood for that and would’ve seen right thru her. Harry wouldn’t need to be mothered so Markle couldn’t have used that manipulation and preyed on his grief & vulnerabilities as far as the loss of his mother went. Diana got into a shocks with a drunk driver and didn’t wear her seatbelt. That’s not murder, that’s poor choices. #FOHarry #FOHarryandMeghan #MeghanMarkleIsABully #HarryAndMeghan #PrincessDiana #GoHomeHarry

Princess CarParkle 👑

166,971 views • 1 year ago

Once again, Harry is dining out on his mother’s death, exploiting it and rewriting history. Diana was NOT killed because she was a working Royal-not only had she not been a working Royal for some time but she had announced a withdrawal from public life in December 1993, almost 4 yrs before her death. It could be argued that had she kept her Royal Protection, she’d still be alive because Royal Protection officers would have NEVER allowed her to get into a car with Henri Paul. They would have never engaged in a car chase with the paparazzi, and they certainly wouldn’t have been drunk behind the wheel. Diana’s death was due to a series of poor decisions-getting into a car with a drunk driver, engaging in a car chase thru city streets, not wearing a seatbelt. I can’t imagine the fury the #PrinceofWales feels every time Harry exploits their mother’s death, brings it up during paid appearances, or uses it as a reason for his bad behavior. I’d argue that their mother’s death affected them differently-William was incredibly close to his mother, even tho she had parentified him and treated him as a peer. Yet we don’t see William dragging her out of the grave to entertain his audience. #HarryandMeghan #HarryIsALossr #PrinceDoofus #MeghanMarkle
2:35

Once again, Harry is dining out on his mother’s death, exploiting it and rewriting history. Diana was NOT killed because she was a working Royal-not only had she not been a working Royal for some time but she had announced a withdrawal from public life in December 1993, almost 4 yrs before her death. It could be argued that had she kept her Royal Protection, she’d still be alive because Royal Protection officers would have NEVER allowed her to get into a car with Henri Paul. They would have never engaged in a car chase with the paparazzi, and they certainly wouldn’t have been drunk behind the wheel. Diana’s death was due to a series of poor decisions-getting into a car with a drunk driver, engaging in a car chase thru city streets, not wearing a seatbelt. I can’t imagine the fury the #PrinceofWales feels every time Harry exploits their mother’s death, brings it up during paid appearances, or uses it as a reason for his bad behavior. I’d argue that their mother’s death affected them differently-William was incredibly close to his mother, even tho she had parentified him and treated him as a peer. Yet we don’t see William dragging her out of the grave to entertain his audience. #HarryandMeghan #HarryIsALossr #PrinceDoofus #MeghanMarkle

Princess CarParkle 👑

26,825 views • 3 months ago

#HarryMarkle is asked what he thinks his mother would think of him “stepping back”. He says she’d be sad, angry at how it’s panned out, but wanted him and #MeghanMarkle to be happy. I think he’s right on most of that, but not for the reasons he thinks. Diana would have been appalled. She’d have been angry at his betrayal of his brother-she raised him to be the person William could rely on and to be supportive. She’d be sad that he turned his back on duty and the Queen, and that he’s allowed what he’s allowed. I believe 100% that had Diana lived, Markle would not be a thing and Harry would have married a woman who understood and respected his position. So he’d right-but that sadness and anger would have been directed at Harry. She said repeatedly and publicly that William was her confidante (despite how parentifying and inappropriate it was) and how close they were. I’m sure that eats Harry alive, #MeghanMarkleExposed #StripTheSussexTitles
0:21

#HarryMarkle is asked what he thinks his mother would think of him “stepping back”. He says she’d be sad, angry at how it’s panned out, but wanted him and #MeghanMarkle to be happy. I think he’s right on most of that, but not for the reasons he thinks. Diana would have been appalled. She’d have been angry at his betrayal of his brother-she raised him to be the person William could rely on and to be supportive. She’d be sad that he turned his back on duty and the Queen, and that he’s allowed what he’s allowed. I believe 100% that had Diana lived, Markle would not be a thing and Harry would have married a woman who understood and respected his position. So he’d right-but that sadness and anger would have been directed at Harry. She said repeatedly and publicly that William was her confidante (despite how parentifying and inappropriate it was) and how close they were. I’m sure that eats Harry alive, #MeghanMarkleExposed #StripTheSussexTitles

Princess CarParkle 👑

126,344 views • 8 months ago

This is a perfect example of the problem with Harry and his big mouth. Why is he revealing private moments about his grandmothers death? She had so little privacy on life, she didn’t need her grandson exploiting her death. If I was #KingCharles, #PrinceofWales or #PrincessAnne I’d have been FURIOUS. #HarryandMeghan #MeghanMarkle
0:57

This is a perfect example of the problem with Harry and his big mouth. Why is he revealing private moments about his grandmothers death? She had so little privacy on life, she didn’t need her grandson exploiting her death. If I was #KingCharles, #PrinceofWales or #PrincessAnne I’d have been FURIOUS. #HarryandMeghan #MeghanMarkle

Princess CarParkle 👑

172,460 views • 9 months ago

Harry and Meghan constantly invoke Diana’s memory - but if they really cared about her, they never would have attacked William and The Crown. It was always Diana’s wish that Harry would be William’s “wingman, not a “hit man.” Through relentless attacks in Spare, multiple interviews, and the press, he’s done the exact opposite of what his mother always hoped for and wanted. 📽️Times Radio
2:14

Harry and Meghan constantly invoke Diana’s memory - but if they really cared about her, they never would have attacked William and The Crown. It was always Diana’s wish that Harry would be William’s “wingman, not a “hit man.” Through relentless attacks in Spare, multiple interviews, and the press, he’s done the exact opposite of what his mother always hoped for and wanted. 📽️Times Radio

British Royaltea

46,439 views • 26 days ago

"The hardest thing I have ever done in my life, is sit in a hospital room and watch my son die, and watch my wife watch her son die." "There was nothing I could do." "I would have done anything." "As hard as it was and still is, I have never experienced anything that made me more aware of the love of God." "God watched his son die for me and for you and he could have stopped it." "He loved us so much that he didn't." Really puts things into perspective, doesn't it?
1:08

"The hardest thing I have ever done in my life, is sit in a hospital room and watch my son die, and watch my wife watch her son die." "There was nothing I could do." "I would have done anything." "As hard as it was and still is, I have never experienced anything that made me more aware of the love of God." "God watched his son die for me and for you and he could have stopped it." "He loved us so much that he didn't." Really puts things into perspective, doesn't it?

AmericanPapaBear™

1,039,322 views • 8 months ago

It’s pretty dark and sinister that Prince Harry says there’s people that want Princess Diana’s history to repeat itself with him, and this likely includes his father and his brother Prince William. Then while former Head of Royal Protection (Neil Basu) who sat on RAVEC says Harry and Meghan’s security risk is of the highest. Both Basu and Harry make it clear that if King Charles wanted his son protected RAVEC would ensure he was. How horrible to have a father who doesn’t mind if something fatal happens to his son and his family and he allowed that to happen. #DeadbeatDadKingCharles #BadDadKingCharles #KingCharles
4:19

It’s pretty dark and sinister that Prince Harry says there’s people that want Princess Diana’s history to repeat itself with him, and this likely includes his father and his brother Prince William. Then while former Head of Royal Protection (Neil Basu) who sat on RAVEC says Harry and Meghan’s security risk is of the highest. Both Basu and Harry make it clear that if King Charles wanted his son protected RAVEC would ensure he was. How horrible to have a father who doesn’t mind if something fatal happens to his son and his family and he allowed that to happen. #DeadbeatDadKingCharles #BadDadKingCharles #KingCharles

Glow Lee

50,607 views • 1 month ago

#HarryMarkle once again speaking for the #PrinceofWales without permission and invading the privacy of not just William but the King. The irony is not lost on me-telling his father he doesn’t have to MARRY Camilla, just being with her should be enough. Marrying her “would cause more harm than good”. Welp-the Queen has proven to be a loyal and supportive wife serving the Commonwealth. Whose wife has caused harm, Harry? You should’ve taken your own advice, pal. The obnoxious, dismissive smugness when he talks about his father finding his person is SO disrespectful. This is shit he should’ve talked to his therapist about, not published. We feel the same way about #HarryandMeghan, and Harry inflicting #MeghanMarkle on us.
0:35

#HarryMarkle once again speaking for the #PrinceofWales without permission and invading the privacy of not just William but the King. The irony is not lost on me-telling his father he doesn’t have to MARRY Camilla, just being with her should be enough. Marrying her “would cause more harm than good”. Welp-the Queen has proven to be a loyal and supportive wife serving the Commonwealth. Whose wife has caused harm, Harry? You should’ve taken your own advice, pal. The obnoxious, dismissive smugness when he talks about his father finding his person is SO disrespectful. This is shit he should’ve talked to his therapist about, not published. We feel the same way about #HarryandMeghan, and Harry inflicting #MeghanMarkle on us.

Princess CarParkle 👑

148,271 views • 9 months ago

This car was cut off by this red car which entered a roundabout and was getting in the highway. When he honked, the red car slammed on its’ brakes and in his opinion, it made him have to jump the curb/median to avoid running into the the back of the red car. The red car speeds away and the driver who has his girlfriend and his dogs in the car decides to follow him. He calls the police and tells them he is following the red car. He has his license plate number by this time. A couple of times he speeds up next to the red car and yells that the police are coming. Is this what you would do? Who was the real road rager here? Many people said the driver with the dash cam is to blame or at the least just as much to blame. What do you think? Would you have followed the red car like this with your girlfriend and dogs in the car? Do you think both of them were road ragers? Or do you think the dash cam car was justified in following like he did?
2:01

This car was cut off by this red car which entered a roundabout and was getting in the highway. When he honked, the red car slammed on its’ brakes and in his opinion, it made him have to jump the curb/median to avoid running into the the back of the red car. The red car speeds away and the driver who has his girlfriend and his dogs in the car decides to follow him. He calls the police and tells them he is following the red car. He has his license plate number by this time. A couple of times he speeds up next to the red car and yells that the police are coming. Is this what you would do? Who was the real road rager here? Many people said the driver with the dash cam is to blame or at the least just as much to blame. What do you think? Would you have followed the red car like this with your girlfriend and dogs in the car? Do you think both of them were road ragers? Or do you think the dash cam car was justified in following like he did?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

379,933 views • 2 months ago

#Commanders QB Jayden Daniels was asked about whether or not he has a sense on where is Brandon Aiyuk in his career: “I don’t know, I don’t have a sense on it. That is my brother and we have a personal relationship. His football future, that’s out of my control”
0:20

#Commanders QB Jayden Daniels was asked about whether or not he has a sense on where is Brandon Aiyuk in his career: “I don’t know, I don’t have a sense on it. That is my brother and we have a personal relationship. His football future, that’s out of my control”

brandon

64,799 views • 2 months ago

“Christian nationalism is a betrayal of Jesus of Nazareth—His life, His death, and His…teachings.” This man is about to clobber Crockett is the Democrat primary for the Texas senate, and when you hear him speak (and then have the misfortune of hearing her speak), it’s not hard to see why; he’s clean-cut, well-spoken, has an amiable face and disposition, and has a very touching story about his young mother fleeing his abusive biological father. That said, I find it interesting that this “progressive Christian” calls Jesus “Jesus of Nazareth” and not Jesus Christ. I also find it interesting that he refers to Jesus’ life, death, and teachings as opposed to His life, death, and resurrection.
1:18

“Christian nationalism is a betrayal of Jesus of Nazareth—His life, His death, and His…teachings.” This man is about to clobber Crockett is the Democrat primary for the Texas senate, and when you hear him speak (and then have the misfortune of hearing her speak), it’s not hard to see why; he’s clean-cut, well-spoken, has an amiable face and disposition, and has a very touching story about his young mother fleeing his abusive biological father. That said, I find it interesting that this “progressive Christian” calls Jesus “Jesus of Nazareth” and not Jesus Christ. I also find it interesting that he refers to Jesus’ life, death, and teachings as opposed to His life, death, and resurrection.

Natalie Jean Beisner

34,109 views • 5 months ago

Stallone says 'what doesn't kill you' is a lie, Arnold fires back that it killed his brother, then credits his brutal childhood for making him leave Austria Stallone: “I can't just blame it on them, cuz when I go back and I look at my mother's upbringing, orphanages and this and that, they were angry. And they just thought, 'That's the way I'm going to pass it on. You're not going to be happy if I'm not happy.'” Arnold: “My brother Meinhard, he died. He died because his reaction was to become an alcoholic himself. One day driving with a car and then hitting a telegraph post. And just smashed into it and got killed.” Arnold: “And on top of it, I said to myself, 'If I would have grown up like some people do with all the love in the world, I would have never left home. I would have stayed in Austria.'” Stallone: “You escaped in bodybuilding. I escaped the theater cuz I wasn't too happy with the reality. So I said, 'This is my world cuz I don't like this one.' I think that we were going to do it no matter what. It just would have been nice with a little bit more encouragement. That's all.” Hearing Arnold talk about his brother completely changes the tone of the conversation. I wasn't expecting it to get that personal. Which part of this conversation stood out to you the most?
4:51

Stallone says 'what doesn't kill you' is a lie, Arnold fires back that it killed his brother, then credits his brutal childhood for making him leave Austria Stallone: “I can't just blame it on them, cuz when I go back and I look at my mother's upbringing, orphanages and this and that, they were angry. And they just thought, 'That's the way I'm going to pass it on. You're not going to be happy if I'm not happy.'” Arnold: “My brother Meinhard, he died. He died because his reaction was to become an alcoholic himself. One day driving with a car and then hitting a telegraph post. And just smashed into it and got killed.” Arnold: “And on top of it, I said to myself, 'If I would have grown up like some people do with all the love in the world, I would have never left home. I would have stayed in Austria.'” Stallone: “You escaped in bodybuilding. I escaped the theater cuz I wasn't too happy with the reality. So I said, 'This is my world cuz I don't like this one.' I think that we were going to do it no matter what. It just would have been nice with a little bit more encouragement. That's all.” Hearing Arnold talk about his brother completely changes the tone of the conversation. I wasn't expecting it to get that personal. Which part of this conversation stood out to you the most?

Zeus

1,010,304 views • 11 days ago

mind you this was what carlos said about standing up for what he believes about the new regulations, he said he would be the first one to stand up and refute them if he didn't agree with it, but the media turn his statement into something that it wasn't Carlos: “I have to give it the opportunity first and then judge, as I have said before, and I insist, if I see that I don’t like it or it doesn’t motivate me or I see that this Formula 1 has too many negative parts, I will be the first to go with Max to talk to Stefano Domenicali or to talk to Mohammed Ben Sulayem to tell him : 'hey this doesn’t work, you were wrong, we didn’t enjoy the car, we have to change something because this is not going anywhere” I will be the first to do it and I will go with Max hand in hand or with George or whoever' “But I insist, I think that my personal level is still not the time and it’s still time to judge without even having run a race” and the fact that it is not the first time, is what is more infuriating
0:47

mind you this was what carlos said about standing up for what he believes about the new regulations, he said he would be the first one to stand up and refute them if he didn't agree with it, but the media turn his statement into something that it wasn't Carlos: “I have to give it the opportunity first and then judge, as I have said before, and I insist, if I see that I don’t like it or it doesn’t motivate me or I see that this Formula 1 has too many negative parts, I will be the first to go with Max to talk to Stefano Domenicali or to talk to Mohammed Ben Sulayem to tell him : 'hey this doesn’t work, you were wrong, we didn’t enjoy the car, we have to change something because this is not going anywhere” I will be the first to do it and I will go with Max hand in hand or with George or whoever' “But I insist, I think that my personal level is still not the time and it’s still time to judge without even having run a race” and the fact that it is not the first time, is what is more infuriating

ari 🦄✨

27,061 views • 5 months ago

🔥This intrigues me..given the possibility that he might still be on the run if his father didn’t turn him in. I wonder if the father only turned him in when & if he discovered his son used his rifle and didn’t want to go to jail. If it was his father’s gun he would have noticed it was MISSING and likely once he saw the PHOTO OF THE GUN & HIS SON KNEW it was him. Wouldn’t the son KNOW his father was going to notice it missing? If that’s the case wouldn’t he know it would be discovered eventually and shown on TV and his father would have recognized it? So then if this was so well thought out wouldn’t the kid ABSOLUTELY TAKE THE GUN WITH HIM to ensure that doesn’t happen because not doing so means you are going to be caught at bare minimum by your father? Lastly the Mauser looks to be from the 1950’s or 1960’s . That means it may not have a Serial number because the law wasn’t passed til 1968. Older fathers that are aficionados like to collect vintage guns. My real two questions are if it IS NOT HIS FATHERS GUN WHOSE IT ? And why didn’t he take it with him? Once again If the father didn’t turn him in he might STILL be on the loose. Was that what meant by retrieve it from a DROP POINT so his father didn’t notice it was missing? If not I have more questions.
0:30

🔥This intrigues me..given the possibility that he might still be on the run if his father didn’t turn him in. I wonder if the father only turned him in when & if he discovered his son used his rifle and didn’t want to go to jail. If it was his father’s gun he would have noticed it was MISSING and likely once he saw the PHOTO OF THE GUN & HIS SON KNEW it was him. Wouldn’t the son KNOW his father was going to notice it missing? If that’s the case wouldn’t he know it would be discovered eventually and shown on TV and his father would have recognized it? So then if this was so well thought out wouldn’t the kid ABSOLUTELY TAKE THE GUN WITH HIM to ensure that doesn’t happen because not doing so means you are going to be caught at bare minimum by your father? Lastly the Mauser looks to be from the 1950’s or 1960’s . That means it may not have a Serial number because the law wasn’t passed til 1968. Older fathers that are aficionados like to collect vintage guns. My real two questions are if it IS NOT HIS FATHERS GUN WHOSE IT ? And why didn’t he take it with him? Once again If the father didn’t turn him in he might STILL be on the loose. Was that what meant by retrieve it from a DROP POINT so his father didn’t notice it was missing? If not I have more questions.

Johnny St.Pete

201,015 views • 10 months ago

Coroner Richard Travers today found that Hayden’s (Justice For Hayden) death was contributed to by neglect, that there was a failure to provide basic medical attention and that he would have survived if not for gross failures in his care. 8 years after his death, 7 years after his first inquest, 3 years after the High Court quashed Not Coroner Shirley Anne Radcliffe 😏’s first inquest, the truth of how our son died has now been properly and honestly recorded.
2:26

Coroner Richard Travers today found that Hayden’s (Justice For Hayden) death was contributed to by neglect, that there was a failure to provide basic medical attention and that he would have survived if not for gross failures in his care. 8 years after his death, 7 years after his first inquest, 3 years after the High Court quashed Not Coroner Shirley Anne Radcliffe 😏’s first inquest, the truth of how our son died has now been properly and honestly recorded.

tumtumtum 🇺🇦

48,127 views • 1 year ago

The next door neighbor is giving the woman a hard time about building the fence near his garage. What makes his ridiculous is that his garage was built without a permit and part of it is on her property. When she confronted him about it, he admits he knows it’s her land and claims the previous owner told him he could do it. To me it seems like he’s trying to bully her into getting his own way, but shouldn’t she file a complaint with the city and have it surveyed so she can get her property back?
3:48

The next door neighbor is giving the woman a hard time about building the fence near his garage. What makes his ridiculous is that his garage was built without a permit and part of it is on her property. When she confronted him about it, he admits he knows it’s her land and claims the previous owner told him he could do it. To me it seems like he’s trying to bully her into getting his own way, but shouldn’t she file a complaint with the city and have it surveyed so she can get her property back?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

128,353 views • 4 months ago

Trump on World Cup: Trump: All I did was ask for a review because I didn’t think it was a foul. And I think it would have been terrible if they wouldn’t allow, you know, a top player—maybe the best, maybe among the best players on the team—to play. I think it would have had a big stain, How would you feel if we took Messi out? You know, “Messi, you ran into somebody.” Or we took Ronaldo out. “Ronaldo, you bumped into somebody. We’re going to take you out of the game.” Or Harry Kane. “Harry Kane, we’re going to take you out of the game, Harry, because you happened to hit somebody a little bit harder.” You can’t do that. If you would have taken him out, I think it would have really stained this incredible championship. We’ve got to have our best players, and Belgium has a great team, by the way. We have to have our best players, and they have to have their best players. If we win or we lose, it’s fair. Otherwise, let’s say we lost him and we lose the game—it would be a terrible thing. So I think they made a really brilliant decision. I think the referee’s call was horrible, and nobody talks about that. They talk about the red card like it’s fine. Nobody talks about the referee’s decision to issue the red card. I didn’t know what the hell a red card was. When I found out, I said, “You’ve got to be kidding.” This guy just holds it up: “OK, your best player is not going to play in the next game.” I said, “Wow, that’s a lot of power. That’s terrible.” But then I looked at his past, and it wasn’t so great.
2:09

Trump on World Cup: Trump: All I did was ask for a review because I didn’t think it was a foul. And I think it would have been terrible if they wouldn’t allow, you know, a top player—maybe the best, maybe among the best players on the team—to play. I think it would have had a big stain, How would you feel if we took Messi out? You know, “Messi, you ran into somebody.” Or we took Ronaldo out. “Ronaldo, you bumped into somebody. We’re going to take you out of the game.” Or Harry Kane. “Harry Kane, we’re going to take you out of the game, Harry, because you happened to hit somebody a little bit harder.” You can’t do that. If you would have taken him out, I think it would have really stained this incredible championship. We’ve got to have our best players, and Belgium has a great team, by the way. We have to have our best players, and they have to have their best players. If we win or we lose, it’s fair. Otherwise, let’s say we lost him and we lose the game—it would be a terrible thing. So I think they made a really brilliant decision. I think the referee’s call was horrible, and nobody talks about that. They talk about the red card like it’s fine. Nobody talks about the referee’s decision to issue the red card. I didn’t know what the hell a red card was. When I found out, I said, “You’ve got to be kidding.” This guy just holds it up: “OK, your best player is not going to play in the next game.” I said, “Wow, that’s a lot of power. That’s terrible.” But then I looked at his past, and it wasn’t so great.

Acyn

2,600,341 views • 25 days ago

This man ordered $35 worth of food from Door Dash and it went in the trash. He’s done with them. He already had his fears and phobias about using Door Dash but he was able put those aside. Well, his fear and phobia came true. This Door Dash delivery driver showed up to his house, hos delivery handle was Pocahontas. When the guy who ordered the food looked out the window he could see a dog inside the car. And as the big delivery driver man got out of the car, the dog had his nose in or close to the bag sniffing it. When he got his bagged order, he realized his drink was missing which he paid $6 for. He followed the driver back outside and could see dog hair all over the car, on the sides of the door, etc. He also noticed his drink didn’t have a seal on it. When he got back into his house, he noticed dog hair inside of his drink! You don’t know who is delivering your order to you or what they have done to it or where it has been. I’ll just order my food, if I order food, and pick it up myself. Better yet, all the more reason to prepare your own meals at home. Have you ever had an order like this go wrong with Door Dash or Uber Eats? Do you have the same fear and phobia this guy has?
3:39

This man ordered $35 worth of food from Door Dash and it went in the trash. He’s done with them. He already had his fears and phobias about using Door Dash but he was able put those aside. Well, his fear and phobia came true. This Door Dash delivery driver showed up to his house, hos delivery handle was Pocahontas. When the guy who ordered the food looked out the window he could see a dog inside the car. And as the big delivery driver man got out of the car, the dog had his nose in or close to the bag sniffing it. When he got his bagged order, he realized his drink was missing which he paid $6 for. He followed the driver back outside and could see dog hair all over the car, on the sides of the door, etc. He also noticed his drink didn’t have a seal on it. When he got back into his house, he noticed dog hair inside of his drink! You don’t know who is delivering your order to you or what they have done to it or where it has been. I’ll just order my food, if I order food, and pick it up myself. Better yet, all the more reason to prepare your own meals at home. Have you ever had an order like this go wrong with Door Dash or Uber Eats? Do you have the same fear and phobia this guy has?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

913,969 views • 3 months ago

Please RT. Final day of Bens inquest and the coroner concluded that antibiotics should have been given earlier and added pseudomonas superinfection to his death certificate which is everything we have battled for 10 years for. More significantly, the coroner used some scathing language about the conduct of the doctors at the inquest and said he would not be relying on their evasive and defensive evidence. University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS FT you are a disgrace to the NHS. Your doctors and legal team at this inquest have been an embarrassment and clearly the lessons you say have been learned, simply have not. As for the illegal samples you have taken from Ben’s body after he died we will come back to that one. I am sure you will deny it like you have denied everything else. CQCProf Wes Streeting Maria Kane Human Tissue Authority
7:34

Please RT. Final day of Bens inquest and the coroner concluded that antibiotics should have been given earlier and added pseudomonas superinfection to his death certificate which is everything we have battled for 10 years for. More significantly, the coroner used some scathing language about the conduct of the doctors at the inquest and said he would not be relying on their evasive and defensive evidence. University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS FT you are a disgrace to the NHS. Your doctors and legal team at this inquest have been an embarrassment and clearly the lessons you say have been learned, simply have not. As for the illegal samples you have taken from Ben’s body after he died we will come back to that one. I am sure you will deny it like you have denied everything else. CQCProf Wes Streeting Maria Kane Human Tissue Authority

Allyn Condon

11,626 views • 1 year ago