Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Anthropic co-founder Chris Olah: There is a real possibility that AI will displace human labor at a very large scale. If that happens, supporting those displaced will be a moral imperative of historic proportions. AI development is concentrated in a handful of wealthy nations. How will we ensure that...

80,787 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

25 Kommentare

Profilbild von Jeffcafe, private detective
Jeffcafe, private detectivevor 4 Monaten

“It is an unsolved problem.”

Profilbild von NexWorld Intel
NexWorld Intelvor 4 Monaten

The real risk isn’t just displacement it’s unequal access to the upside.

Profilbild von Catherine Lee
Catherine Leevor 4 Monaten

Is this what they want: subjugate the masses? Keep them in survival mode and usher in the techno-feudalism.

Profilbild von ShogunX
ShogunXvor 4 Monaten

Humanity really said “let’s automate everything” before deciding how people are supposed to pay rent afterward😂💔

Profilbild von Henry Clay
Henry Clayvor 4 Monaten

The “elites” are getting ready to genocide the planet.

Profilbild von ✗Nomad 🐦‍🔥
✗Nomad 🐦‍🔥vor 4 Monaten

The real alignment problem isnt between humans and machines... its between the few who own the future and the rest of us who don even have a seat at the table... who decides for who

Profilbild von Prowling 𐱅𐰇𐰼𐰰
Prowling 𐱅𐰇𐰼𐰰vor 4 Monaten

Naive words such as "some nation gets some don't" leads to global AI dominance. Pope and this guy are GLOBALISTS and want to spread AI globalism under corpo-govern survelliance state.

Profilbild von Eric Krehbiel
Eric Krehbielvor 4 Monaten

It is imperative for the good of humanity that Anthropic fails

Profilbild von GJdMvV
GJdMvVvor 4 Monaten

Human labor? I smell the scent of 'conceptual disorientation'. Somebody has to clean the toilet.

Profilbild von alice
alicevor 4 Monaten

I can see a world where a society produces their basic needs with tech in abundance, no more scarcity, no need to "work" or money or anything like this shit now. But humans are different. Paradise for them it too boring ( according to their own stories...) & they want "action".2/

Profilbild von Gerard Sans | Axiom 🇬🇧
Gerard Sans | Axiom 🇬🇧vor 4 Monaten

Relevant Anthropic’s doublespeak history:

Profilbild von CyberApollo
CyberApollovor 4 Monaten

There wont be choice. If Ai replaces even a portion of jobs, People simply wont have any money to buy products or services. Its kinda funny when Bernie Sanders complains about Ai, Bernie, Amazon will not be doing well if most of its customers can't get an income..

Profilbild von Tips
Tipsvor 4 Monaten

Where do human go to work if AI take over everything

Profilbild von alice
alicevor 4 Monaten

For now, let it stew.They will be forced anyway in due time. it will be a new system,new social contract, new everything or extinction. But humans are survivalists, they probably adapt. Screaming,kicking & yelling but that's just the first generation. it'll settle down later. 5/x

Profilbild von alice
alicevor 4 Monaten

But it's a problem the humans don't want to talk about nor solve cause they don't want that world. The bad part of that is,they don't want it EVEN IF IT COULD BE DONE IN A BETTER WAY FOR ALL. It can be done but their irrationality gets in the way. Their emotions about lifeviews1/

Profilbild von At Times
At Timesvor 4 Monaten

"This is our duty to the global poor." This is what globalists are doing to "a handful of wealthy nations." BUILD BACK BETTER requires demolition of existing structures.

Profilbild von alice
alicevor 4 Monaten

But humans don't really remember that evolution was forced. They put it in their history books as a sort of "normal' transition due to environmental factors.They don't want to talk about it.Just like today. The current system is UNATTANABLE, That's WHY NEW adaptation is needed 4/

Profilbild von alice
alicevor 4 Monaten

Now I find that absurd. But these emotions humans are ruled by so that's the reason they are so upset by these ideas. It's a revolution & evolution similar to going from nomadic to sedentary, agriculture & then the big cities came. That was not their free will. It was forced 3/

Profilbild von Gerard Sans | Axiom 🇬🇧
Gerard Sans | Axiom 🇬🇧vor 4 Monaten

Relevant context:

Profilbild von Elias Thorne
Elias Thornevor 4 Monaten

I don't think it will Remember how American businesses took advantage of H1B to shave off a few cents? They will "use" AI to do this until AI isn't cheap any more Then they will go back to H1Bs

Profilbild von curious وزیرستانی
curious وزیرستانیvor 4 Monaten

Anthropic g@ys always uses cheap tactics for marketing

Profilbild von la nhu phong
la nhu phongvor 4 Monaten

One of the most overlooked aspects of cybersecurity is the trade-off between efficiency, security, and cost.

Profilbild von Christopher Molin
Christopher Molinvor 4 Monaten

Disgusting how the same company says that it will be "inevitable" and "only X months left", now downplays it to a "possibility". The Pope Manifesto is an Anthropic Advertisement. This is why we don't have American Popes...

Profilbild von J
Jvor 4 Monaten

That’s their plan

Profilbild von Stanislav Gryshyn
Stanislav Gryshynvor 4 Monaten

the distribution problem is older than AI - we never solved it for electricity or the internet either

Ähnliche Videos

Sam Altman's new interview: AI should not be designed to pursue goals that are disconnected from human needs. People must remain at the center of AI development. “I have no interest in building a super-smart AI that accomplishes some non-human goals. People should react. People should say, ‘Hey, this is what I want, and this is what I do not want.’ I do not think the issue is that we have failed to explain the benefits. We say, ‘AI is going to cure a bunch of diseases,’ and people say, ‘Okay, that is great, but that is not really my question. My question is: What is my role in the future? What is my economic future? What is my agency? How do I know that my kids and my family will still be able to have fulfilling, creative expression, struggle, drive the world forward, grow, and do this thing together in a way that has worked for a long time?’ When people in AI say, ‘Sure, there are going to be no jobs,’ or ‘50% of jobs are going to go away,’ or ‘90% of jobs are going to go away,’ and ‘AI is going to be smarter than you at everything,’ and ‘We will give you some basic income, but you are not really going to have a role,’ that is horrible. And by the way, if an AI company says, ‘Maybe we are going to destroy all the jobs, and we will be the most valuable company in the world,’ people should look at you like, ‘Yeah, that is a terrible message.’ I do not think the problem is that we have not articulated the upsides. I think people actually believe us. They hear, ‘AI may cure your cancer,’ and they think, ‘That sounds great.’ I think we, as an industry, have failed to explain how people stay in control of determining the future at every step, and how people can still have a meaningful life in all the ways we care about.” ---- From "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

79,111 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten