Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Anthropic just quietly published the most terrifying chart in tech The blue zone = what AI can automate right now. The red zone = what's actually being used. The gap between them is enormous - and it's not closing slowly. It's waiting to snap shut. > #1 most at-risk... show more

BuBBliK

22,998 subscribers

233,131 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

OpenAI founder just said: "Jobs will go away. Jobs have gone away with every technological revolution. Jobs will change." The question is not if your job changes, it's whether you're on the right side of that change. The people adapting fastest right now are the ones who actually know what AI can do. Most don't and thinking AI won't affect you is already a losing position. That's why I put together a guide on what AI can actually do, the capabilities most people have never found. Read the post below and you'll already be ahead of 99% of people using AI right now.

OpenAI founder just said: "Jobs will go away. Jobs have gone away with every technological revolution. Jobs will change." The question is not if your job changes, it's whether you're on the right side of that change. The people adapting fastest right now are the ones who actually know what AI can do. Most don't and thinking AI won't affect you is already a losing position. That's why I put together a guide on what AI can actually do, the capabilities most people have never found. Read the post below and you'll already be ahead of 99% of people using AI right now.

Anatoli Kopadze

26,169 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This is a clear indicator of how hard the job market is in America right now It is statistically harder to get a job at Dutch Bros than it is to get into Harvard - Over 780,000 people applied for Dutch Bros jobs last year, they accepted just 2.4% of applicants - Harvard's acceptance rate was 4.2% Entry-level hiring is getting overwhelmed with competition due to displacement White-collar workers are losing their jobs, so now a 17 year old high school student is competing with people who have college degrees and work experience for entry-level jobs AI is a contributing factor

This is a clear indicator of how hard the job market is in America right now It is statistically harder to get a job at Dutch Bros than it is to get into Harvard - Over 780,000 people applied for Dutch Bros jobs last year, they accepted just 2.4% of applicants - Harvard's acceptance rate was 4.2% Entry-level hiring is getting overwhelmed with competition due to displacement White-collar workers are losing their jobs, so now a 17 year old high school student is competing with people who have college degrees and work experience for entry-level jobs AI is a contributing factor

Wall Street Apes

120,411 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The man who built ChatGPT just issued a verdict on your career. Andrej Karpathy, co-founder of OpenAI, the architect of Tesla Autopilot just ranked every job in America by one brutal question, how soon does AI replace you? He pulled all 342 occupations from official US government labor data. And fed each one to an AI with a scoring rubric, published the results for the world to see. The verdict is that the average American worker scores 5.3 out of 10 for AI replacement risk. More than half the economy is already inside the blast radius. Here is what the numbers actually say. 42% of all US jobs score 7 or higher and that's 59.9 million people. The jobs at the top of the kill list are not low-skill factory work. They are the highest-paid, most-educated careers in the country. Software developers, 9/10, Financial analysts: 9/10. Lawyers: 8/10, Office administrators: 9/10. The jobs that require a laptop are the jobs in the crosshairs Jobs scoring 7 or above represent $3.7 trillion in annual U.S. wages. Roofers score a 1 and construction workers score a 1. The people who everyone called unskilled may be the most recession-proof workers alive. Karpathy's rule is one sentence, if the entire job happens on a screen, exposure is high. Anthropic, the company behind Claude published its own data the same week. Anthropic also found something nobody is talking about. Hiring for young workers aged 22–25 in high exposure jobs is already slowing down. The layoffs have not spiked yet but the hiring has stopped. The most chilling part is not the 10/10 score but rather that no job scored a zero. There is no safe harbor, only degrees of exposure.

The man who built ChatGPT just issued a verdict on your career. Andrej Karpathy, co-founder of OpenAI, the architect of Tesla Autopilot just ranked every job in America by one brutal question, how soon does AI replace you? He pulled all 342 occupations from official US government labor data. And fed each one to an AI with a scoring rubric, published the results for the world to see. The verdict is that the average American worker scores 5.3 out of 10 for AI replacement risk. More than half the economy is already inside the blast radius. Here is what the numbers actually say. 42% of all US jobs score 7 or higher and that's 59.9 million people. The jobs at the top of the kill list are not low-skill factory work. They are the highest-paid, most-educated careers in the country. Software developers, 9/10, Financial analysts: 9/10. Lawyers: 8/10, Office administrators: 9/10. The jobs that require a laptop are the jobs in the crosshairs Jobs scoring 7 or above represent $3.7 trillion in annual U.S. wages. Roofers score a 1 and construction workers score a 1. The people who everyone called unskilled may be the most recession-proof workers alive. Karpathy's rule is one sentence, if the entire job happens on a screen, exposure is high. Anthropic, the company behind Claude published its own data the same week. Anthropic also found something nobody is talking about. Hiring for young workers aged 22–25 in high exposure jobs is already slowing down. The layoffs have not spiked yet but the hiring has stopped. The most chilling part is not the 10/10 score but rather that no job scored a zero. There is no safe harbor, only degrees of exposure.

StockMarket.News

216,992 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Steve Jobs offers a contrarian view: The CEO isn't at the top of the company, they're at the bottom. When Jobs returned to Apple in 1997, the company was near collapse with a market value of just $3 billion. He came back with a radically different philosophy on how great companies should operate, one that flipped the traditional hierarchy upside down. Jobs explains his thinking: "Where you've got incredibly talented people that are also rare and in demand. If you don't treat them right, they can go get another job in 10 minutes, right? So this strange thing happens which is that the hierarchy of power inverts and the CEO is actually at the bottom." For Jobs, this reflected how he genuinely saw his role: "I sort of feel like I work for most of these people because they're the ones that are doing all the brilliant work. And it's the same in software. It's the same thing. The best people are very hard to come by. And so it's management's job to support them cuz they're on the front lines doing the work. That's kind of how we run the place." When asked how he actually puts this into practice, Jobs broke it down: "We do that by creating the right environment, a very rich environment, and removing obstacles out of their way and putting together the right teams of people together and getting the right projects, keeping the quality levels very high both in terms of people and strategy and projects."

Steve Jobs offers a contrarian view: The CEO isn't at the top of the company, they're at the bottom. When Jobs returned to Apple in 1997, the company was near collapse with a market value of just $3 billion. He came back with a radically different philosophy on how great companies should operate, one that flipped the traditional hierarchy upside down. Jobs explains his thinking: "Where you've got incredibly talented people that are also rare and in demand. If you don't treat them right, they can go get another job in 10 minutes, right? So this strange thing happens which is that the hierarchy of power inverts and the CEO is actually at the bottom." For Jobs, this reflected how he genuinely saw his role: "I sort of feel like I work for most of these people because they're the ones that are doing all the brilliant work. And it's the same in software. It's the same thing. The best people are very hard to come by. And so it's management's job to support them cuz they're on the front lines doing the work. That's kind of how we run the place." When asked how he actually puts this into practice, Jobs broke it down: "We do that by creating the right environment, a very rich environment, and removing obstacles out of their way and putting together the right teams of people together and getting the right projects, keeping the quality levels very high both in terms of people and strategy and projects."

Big Brain Business

11,456 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

BREAKING: Jeff Bezos just flipped the AI jobs narrative completely. "I think what's actually going to happen is we're going to have labor scarcity." Not mass unemployment. Labor shortage. "The people saying AI kills jobs are wrong." His reasoning: AI drives productivity. Productivity raises living standards. Higher living standards mean people choose to work less. Not because they're fired. Because they can afford not to. "The iPhone doesn't get reserved for just a few people. It's not how it works." Two of the most successful entrepreneurs in history. Bezos and Musk. Both saying the same thing. AI creates abundance. Not scarcity. The pessimists are loud. The builders are busy.

BREAKING: Jeff Bezos just flipped the AI jobs narrative completely. "I think what's actually going to happen is we're going to have labor scarcity." Not mass unemployment. Labor shortage. "The people saying AI kills jobs are wrong." His reasoning: AI drives productivity. Productivity raises living standards. Higher living standards mean people choose to work less. Not because they're fired. Because they can afford not to. "The iPhone doesn't get reserved for just a few people. It's not how it works." Two of the most successful entrepreneurs in history. Bezos and Musk. Both saying the same thing. AI creates abundance. Not scarcity. The pessimists are loud. The builders are busy.

Crypto Tice

59,277 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Anthropic just dropped Claude Fable. Most powerful AI ever released to the public. Here's what we did with it in 24 hours: Asked it to map BTC's key support and resistance on the daily chart. It drew them itself. Live. Inside TradingView in 30 seconds. Old way: - Stare at the chart for an hour - Draw, second-guess, redraw - Still not sure if you got it right New way: - Open Claude Fable - Give it one prompt - Watch it happen in real time The game just changed. Most people haven't noticed yet. Learn more:

Anthropic just dropped Claude Fable. Most powerful AI ever released to the public. Here's what we did with it in 24 hours: Asked it to map BTC's key support and resistance on the daily chart. It drew them itself. Live. Inside TradingView in 30 seconds. Old way: - Stare at the chart for an hour - Draw, second-guess, redraw - Still not sure if you got it right New way: - Open Claude Fable - Give it one prompt - Watch it happen in real time The game just changed. Most people haven't noticed yet. Learn more:

AI Bulls

23,040 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The corporate ladder doesn't exist anymore. It's structurally GONE. The bottom rungs have been removed. And the data proves it beyond any debate: Employment for software developers aged 22 to 25 has fallen nearly 20% since late 2022. The exact moment generative AI went mainstream. Developers aged 30 and older at the SAME companies? Employment grew 6 to 12%. Same companies. Same industry. Same economy. Young workers got cut. Senior workers got raises. This is literally a restructuring of who gets to have a career. Entry-level jobs across AI-exposed fields collapsed: - Software postings dropped from 43% entry-level to 28% - Data roles dropped from 35% to 22% - Consulting dropped from 41% to 26% Total entry-level postings in the US down 35% since January 2023. Bloomberg reported this week that 43% of US graduates aged 22 to 27 are now underemployed. Working jobs that don't require the degree they just spent four years and six figures earning. Meanwhile 60% of entry-level jobs now require 3+ years of experience. Entry-level. Three years experience required. You need the job to get the experience. You need the experience to get the job. The loop is closed. So here's what you need to understand: Every generation before this one had a deal. An unspoken contract between companies and young workers. You start at the bottom. You answer phones. You build spreadsheets. You write the first draft that a senior person edits. You sit in meetings you don't understand yet. You learn by doing the work nobody else wants to do. That was the training ground. The apprenticeship that turned a 22yo with a degree into a 28yo who could actually run something. But AI automated that entire layer: First drafts? ChatGPT. Data entry? Automated. Basic code? Copilot. Customer support tier 1? Agents. Report generation? Gone. Research summaries? Gone. Junior analyst work? Gone. The tasks that used to TEACH young people how to become senior people no longer exist as jobs. Companies aren't replacing those roles with training programs. They're just not hiring juniors at all. SignalFire found a 50% decline in new hires with less than one year of post-graduate experience at major tech companies between 2019 and 2024. The Dallas Fed confirmed it: Young people aren't getting fired... They're never getting HIRED in the first place. The door closed before they could walk through it. Now you have an economy with two classes: Senior workers who learned their skills BEFORE AI. They carry institutional knowledge, judgment, and context no model can replicate. Wages rising. Jobs secure. AI makes them MORE valuable. Young workers who graduated INTO the AI era. Their textbook knowledge is exactly what AI replicates best. Wages stagnant. Jobs disappearing. Redundant before they've had a chance to become anything. Walmart's CEO started by unloading trucks. HP's CEO started in a call center. GM's CEO started on the assembly line at 18. Those paths are gone. Not because companies are evil - but because the WORK those paths were built on no longer requires a human. And here's the scary part to me: If nobody trains the next generation, there IS no next generation. The 28yo manager you want to hire in 2030 is the 22yo who can't get an entry-level job today. The senior talent you're hoarding will retire. Nobody will be behind them. Because nobody invested in building them. So every company celebrating "doing more with less" is quietly destroying the pipeline of people who would have become their future leaders. The ladder isn't broken. It's been REMOVED. And nobody's building a new one.

The corporate ladder doesn't exist anymore. It's structurally GONE. The bottom rungs have been removed. And the data proves it beyond any debate: Employment for software developers aged 22 to 25 has fallen nearly 20% since late 2022. The exact moment generative AI went mainstream. Developers aged 30 and older at the SAME companies? Employment grew 6 to 12%. Same companies. Same industry. Same economy. Young workers got cut. Senior workers got raises. This is literally a restructuring of who gets to have a career. Entry-level jobs across AI-exposed fields collapsed: - Software postings dropped from 43% entry-level to 28% - Data roles dropped from 35% to 22% - Consulting dropped from 41% to 26% Total entry-level postings in the US down 35% since January 2023. Bloomberg reported this week that 43% of US graduates aged 22 to 27 are now underemployed. Working jobs that don't require the degree they just spent four years and six figures earning. Meanwhile 60% of entry-level jobs now require 3+ years of experience. Entry-level. Three years experience required. You need the job to get the experience. You need the experience to get the job. The loop is closed. So here's what you need to understand: Every generation before this one had a deal. An unspoken contract between companies and young workers. You start at the bottom. You answer phones. You build spreadsheets. You write the first draft that a senior person edits. You sit in meetings you don't understand yet. You learn by doing the work nobody else wants to do. That was the training ground. The apprenticeship that turned a 22yo with a degree into a 28yo who could actually run something. But AI automated that entire layer: First drafts? ChatGPT. Data entry? Automated. Basic code? Copilot. Customer support tier 1? Agents. Report generation? Gone. Research summaries? Gone. Junior analyst work? Gone. The tasks that used to TEACH young people how to become senior people no longer exist as jobs. Companies aren't replacing those roles with training programs. They're just not hiring juniors at all. SignalFire found a 50% decline in new hires with less than one year of post-graduate experience at major tech companies between 2019 and 2024. The Dallas Fed confirmed it: Young people aren't getting fired... They're never getting HIRED in the first place. The door closed before they could walk through it. Now you have an economy with two classes: Senior workers who learned their skills BEFORE AI. They carry institutional knowledge, judgment, and context no model can replicate. Wages rising. Jobs secure. AI makes them MORE valuable. Young workers who graduated INTO the AI era. Their textbook knowledge is exactly what AI replicates best. Wages stagnant. Jobs disappearing. Redundant before they've had a chance to become anything. Walmart's CEO started by unloading trucks. HP's CEO started in a call center. GM's CEO started on the assembly line at 18. Those paths are gone. Not because companies are evil - but because the WORK those paths were built on no longer requires a human. And here's the scary part to me: If nobody trains the next generation, there IS no next generation. The 28yo manager you want to hire in 2030 is the 22yo who can't get an entry-level job today. The senior talent you're hoarding will retire. Nobody will be behind them. Because nobody invested in building them. So every company celebrating "doing more with less" is quietly destroying the pipeline of people who would have become their future leaders. The ladder isn't broken. It's been REMOVED. And nobody's building a new one.

Ricardo

11,900 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Goldman Sachs just published the list of jobs AI will eliminate first. 300 million jobs globally. 25% of all US work hours. And that's not in 10 years, it's starting NOW. Highest risk of displacement according to Goldman: 1. Computer programmers 2. Accountants 3. Auditors 4. Legal assistants 5. Administrative assistants 6. Customer service reps 7. Telemarketers 8. Proofreaders 9. Copy editors 10. Credit analysts. 46% of all office and administrative tasks can be automated. 44% of legal work. 37% of architecture and engineering. 36% of science. 35% of business and finance. These aren't warehouse jobs. These aren't factory floor positions. These are the careers parents told their kids to pursue. "Go to college. Get a degree. Get a desk job. You'll be safe." Goldman Sachs just told you that desk is getting emptied. And the data is already showing up in real time: Tech employment as a share of the US economy has dropped below its long-term trend for the first time since records began. Marketing consulting, graphic design, office administration, and call centers are all seeing employment growth fall below trend. Younger workers are getting hit first and hardest. Goldman's lead economist said it directly: "The big story in 2026 in labor will be AI." But here's what the report doesn't mention: Goldman Sachs is one of the biggest investors in the companies BUILDING the AI that eliminates these jobs. They underwrote OpenAI's funding rounds. They're advising on the $700 billion in AI infrastructure spending this year. They profit from every merger, every capex deal, every stock offering tied to AI. The same bank telling you 300 million jobs are at risk is making billions helping the companies that will take them. And the corporate playbook is already locked in: Meta is firing 16,000 people. 20% of its entire workforce. While doubling AI spending to $135 billion. Stock went up 3% on the announcement. Block fired 40% of its staff. Stock surged 24%. Atlassian cut 10%. Same pattern. Over 61,000 AI-linked layoffs since November. 764 people per day losing their jobs in tech alone. Every single time a company announces mass layoffs and says "AI," the stock price goes up. Wall Street has created a system where firing humans is the most profitable announcement a CEO can make. Goldman's report says the jobs most PROTECTED from AI are air traffic controllers, chief executives, radiologists, pharmacists, and members of the clergy. Notice who's safe? The people at the top and the people praying. Everyone in the middle is exposed. The entry-level white-collar worker who spent four years and $200,000 on a degree is now competing against software that works 24/7, never takes vacation, never asks for a raise, and improves every single week. Goldman even admits younger workers in their 20s and 30s entering knowledge and content creation sectors will be "most affected." The generation that was told AI would make their lives better is the one getting displaced by it first. And it gets even WORSE: Goldman says if this displacement happens faster than their 10 year base case, the economic impact "could be much larger." Basically: if companies move fast, which they already are, the fallout will be worse than their projections. They're already moving fast. $700 billion in AI infrastructure this year. Mass layoffs at every major tech company. Stock prices rewarding every single one. The report is 50 pages of data telling you exactly what's coming. Most people won't read past the headline. But you just did.

Goldman Sachs just published the list of jobs AI will eliminate first. 300 million jobs globally. 25% of all US work hours. And that's not in 10 years, it's starting NOW. Highest risk of displacement according to Goldman: 1. Computer programmers 2. Accountants 3. Auditors 4. Legal assistants 5. Administrative assistants 6. Customer service reps 7. Telemarketers 8. Proofreaders 9. Copy editors 10. Credit analysts. 46% of all office and administrative tasks can be automated. 44% of legal work. 37% of architecture and engineering. 36% of science. 35% of business and finance. These aren't warehouse jobs. These aren't factory floor positions. These are the careers parents told their kids to pursue. "Go to college. Get a degree. Get a desk job. You'll be safe." Goldman Sachs just told you that desk is getting emptied. And the data is already showing up in real time: Tech employment as a share of the US economy has dropped below its long-term trend for the first time since records began. Marketing consulting, graphic design, office administration, and call centers are all seeing employment growth fall below trend. Younger workers are getting hit first and hardest. Goldman's lead economist said it directly: "The big story in 2026 in labor will be AI." But here's what the report doesn't mention: Goldman Sachs is one of the biggest investors in the companies BUILDING the AI that eliminates these jobs. They underwrote OpenAI's funding rounds. They're advising on the $700 billion in AI infrastructure spending this year. They profit from every merger, every capex deal, every stock offering tied to AI. The same bank telling you 300 million jobs are at risk is making billions helping the companies that will take them. And the corporate playbook is already locked in: Meta is firing 16,000 people. 20% of its entire workforce. While doubling AI spending to $135 billion. Stock went up 3% on the announcement. Block fired 40% of its staff. Stock surged 24%. Atlassian cut 10%. Same pattern. Over 61,000 AI-linked layoffs since November. 764 people per day losing their jobs in tech alone. Every single time a company announces mass layoffs and says "AI," the stock price goes up. Wall Street has created a system where firing humans is the most profitable announcement a CEO can make. Goldman's report says the jobs most PROTECTED from AI are air traffic controllers, chief executives, radiologists, pharmacists, and members of the clergy. Notice who's safe? The people at the top and the people praying. Everyone in the middle is exposed. The entry-level white-collar worker who spent four years and $200,000 on a degree is now competing against software that works 24/7, never takes vacation, never asks for a raise, and improves every single week. Goldman even admits younger workers in their 20s and 30s entering knowledge and content creation sectors will be "most affected." The generation that was told AI would make their lives better is the one getting displaced by it first. And it gets even WORSE: Goldman says if this displacement happens faster than their 10 year base case, the economic impact "could be much larger." Basically: if companies move fast, which they already are, the fallout will be worse than their projections. They're already moving fast. $700 billion in AI infrastructure this year. Mass layoffs at every major tech company. Stock prices rewarding every single one. The report is 50 pages of data telling you exactly what's coming. Most people won't read past the headline. But you just did.

Ricardo

235,676 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Americans cannot afford the cost of living in America, this has to change “I have three jobs and I'm still struggling,” one is a full time job and 2 are part time jobs “The solution is not to get a fourth job. There's something wrong with this something has got to give to where we live in a world where people can work multiple jobs and they're still struggling” “The solution isn't you need another job or you're just lazy and you don't want to work. We're working multiple jobs. What more do we have to do in order to live comfortably in this world? I think it's ridiculous.”

Americans cannot afford the cost of living in America, this has to change “I have three jobs and I'm still struggling,” one is a full time job and 2 are part time jobs “The solution is not to get a fourth job. There's something wrong with this something has got to give to where we live in a world where people can work multiple jobs and they're still struggling” “The solution isn't you need another job or you're just lazy and you don't want to work. We're working multiple jobs. What more do we have to do in order to live comfortably in this world? I think it's ridiculous.”

Wall Street Apes

82,954 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

.Governor Mark Gordon: "When a kid grows up in Wyoming, their education's paid for, in large part, by the coal severance taxes — by the royalties that come from mining that coal. That was shut down by the Democrats. When they have a chance to get a job, they can go look to the coal mine, and it’s not just digging coal the way we used to — it’s high-tech jobs... it is very, very technologically proficient, and what's more important, it’s environmentally sound."

.Governor Mark Gordon: "When a kid grows up in Wyoming, their education's paid for, in large part, by the coal severance taxes — by the royalties that come from mining that coal. That was shut down by the Democrats. When they have a chance to get a job, they can go look to the coal mine, and it’s not just digging coal the way we used to — it’s high-tech jobs... it is very, very technologically proficient, and what's more important, it’s environmentally sound."

Rapid Response 47

128,065 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Steve Jobs gives a counterintuitive take on leadership: "a CEO should be at the bottom of the hierarchy" Most people think power flows downward in an organisation from the CEO to everyone else. But Steve Jobs believed the opposite. In the clip below, he explains what happens when you build a company around genuinely exceptional people (whether in technology or in creative work like Pixar): "Incredibly talented people that are also rare and in demand — if you don't treat them right, they can go get another job in 10 minutes." Because of that, something counterintuitive happens. The hierarchy of power inverts. Jobs puts it plainly: "The CEO is actually at the bottom. I sort of feel like I work for most of these people, because they're the ones doing all the brilliant work." This isn't Jobs's modesty shining through. It's a structural insight about where value is actually created. Whether in software, hardware, or creative production... the best people are extraordinarily hard to find. And they know it. Their leverage is real. So what does management's job become? "It's management's job to support them. Because they're on the front lines doing the work." The leaders who build the most extraordinary things aren't the ones who command from the top — they're the ones who clear the path for the people doing the real work.

Steve Jobs gives a counterintuitive take on leadership: "a CEO should be at the bottom of the hierarchy" Most people think power flows downward in an organisation from the CEO to everyone else. But Steve Jobs believed the opposite. In the clip below, he explains what happens when you build a company around genuinely exceptional people (whether in technology or in creative work like Pixar): "Incredibly talented people that are also rare and in demand — if you don't treat them right, they can go get another job in 10 minutes." Because of that, something counterintuitive happens. The hierarchy of power inverts. Jobs puts it plainly: "The CEO is actually at the bottom. I sort of feel like I work for most of these people, because they're the ones doing all the brilliant work." This isn't Jobs's modesty shining through. It's a structural insight about where value is actually created. Whether in software, hardware, or creative production... the best people are extraordinarily hard to find. And they know it. Their leverage is real. So what does management's job become? "It's management's job to support them. Because they're on the front lines doing the work." The leaders who build the most extraordinary things aren't the ones who command from the top — they're the ones who clear the path for the people doing the real work.

Big Brain Business

42,189 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

This guy is spitting absolute facts. 🔥 “The trades are for dumb people” is one of the dumbest lies we’ve been sold. These jobs require real intelligence — reading blueprints, troubleshooting electrical systems, fixing what keeps entire buildings running at 2 a.m. Most college grads who look down on trades would tap out in a week. College isn’t the problem. Going $80k in debt for a degree that doesn’t lead to a real career is. Choose the path that matches your skills and actually pays. We need more people who can do things, not just talk about them. Respect to every skilled tradesperson out here. 💪

This guy is spitting absolute facts. 🔥 “The trades are for dumb people” is one of the dumbest lies we’ve been sold. These jobs require real intelligence — reading blueprints, troubleshooting electrical systems, fixing what keeps entire buildings running at 2 a.m. Most college grads who look down on trades would tap out in a week. College isn’t the problem. Going $80k in debt for a degree that doesn’t lead to a real career is. Choose the path that matches your skills and actually pays. We need more people who can do things, not just talk about them. Respect to every skilled tradesperson out here. 💪

DocumentingLibs

16,779 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic, went on CNN and put a number on the thing most AI CEOs will not say out loud: Half of all entry-level white-collar jobs gone. Unemployment at 10 to 20%. Inside 1 to 5 years. "The most salient feature of the technology, and what is driving all of this, is how fast the technology is getting better." "A couple of years ago, you could say that AI models were maybe as good as a smart high school student. I would say that now they're as good as a smart college student, and sort of reaching past that." "I really worry, particularly at the entry level, that the AI models are very much at the center of what an entry level human worker would do." "What is striking to me about this AI boom is that it's bigger and it's broader and it's moving faster than anything has before." "People will adapt, but they may not adapt fast enough. And so there may be an adjustment period." The tell: this is not a critic outside the industry. It is the man building the models saying the quiet part on camera -- because he thinks the people whose jobs are on the line adapt slower than the models improve. High school to college in two years was the warm-up. The entry level is where it lands first.

Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic, went on CNN and put a number on the thing most AI CEOs will not say out loud: Half of all entry-level white-collar jobs gone. Unemployment at 10 to 20%. Inside 1 to 5 years. "The most salient feature of the technology, and what is driving all of this, is how fast the technology is getting better." "A couple of years ago, you could say that AI models were maybe as good as a smart high school student. I would say that now they're as good as a smart college student, and sort of reaching past that." "I really worry, particularly at the entry level, that the AI models are very much at the center of what an entry level human worker would do." "What is striking to me about this AI boom is that it's bigger and it's broader and it's moving faster than anything has before." "People will adapt, but they may not adapt fast enough. And so there may be an adjustment period." The tell: this is not a critic outside the industry. It is the man building the models saying the quiet part on camera -- because he thinks the people whose jobs are on the line adapt slower than the models improve. High school to college in two years was the warm-up. The entry level is where it lands first.

Karl Mehta

341,287 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Most traders know CRT but very few know where to enter, that’s the difference between analysis and precision. In this 12-min lecture, there is an in-depth break down of the Top Entry Models that make CRT deadly accurate: • The TURTLE SOUP MODEL • The MODEL #1 (OB/CSD) • The INVERSION ENTRY (advanced MSS) • The BREAKER ENTRY CRT is not just about spotting the range, it’s about knowing the exact point price is ready to move. This is where most traders get it wrong, they see the setup but enter at the wrong time, after this video you’ll know exactly what to wait for. No more early entries. No more late entries. Just precision. 🎥 12 minutes that can change how you execute forever.

Most traders know CRT but very few know where to enter, that’s the difference between analysis and precision. In this 12-min lecture, there is an in-depth break down of the Top Entry Models that make CRT deadly accurate: • The TURTLE SOUP MODEL • The MODEL #1 (OB/CSD) • The INVERSION ENTRY (advanced MSS) • The BREAKER ENTRY CRT is not just about spotting the range, it’s about knowing the exact point price is ready to move. This is where most traders get it wrong, they see the setup but enter at the wrong time, after this video you’ll know exactly what to wait for. No more early entries. No more late entries. Just precision. 🎥 12 minutes that can change how you execute forever.

R1X TRADES (GER40)

28,674 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

I asked Mavericks coach Jason Kidd about Christian Wood's playing time continuing to be reduced in addition to not closing games since the trade deadline: "You look at just the depth that we have with all the bigs, we're trying to get them in the game and see who has the hot hand, and right now, with Maxi [Kleber] back, that's going to cut some of his minutes down, especially when we're healthy. That's just the way it is right now, and it can change as we go forward."

I asked Mavericks coach Jason Kidd about Christian Wood's playing time continuing to be reduced in addition to not closing games since the trade deadline: "You look at just the depth that we have with all the bigs, we're trying to get them in the game and see who has the hot hand, and right now, with Maxi [Kleber] back, that's going to cut some of his minutes down, especially when we're healthy. That's just the way it is right now, and it can change as we go forward."

Grant Afseth

720,501 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Anthropic's CPO just killed the boundaries between three Claude products. you should kill them inside your prompt too. Mike Krieger dropped a line most builders skipped: > "we're shipping our harness strategy, not a product." he doubled down later: the separation between the three products is "a broken abstraction we need to fix." Anthropic spent a year separating Claude AI, Cowork, and Claude Code into distinct surfaces. their own CPO now says the separation was the bug. they're collapsing it into one harness. the same abstraction is broken inside every Claude prompt you've written. you ask Claude to predict, pick, size, exit, and audit: five jobs glued together pretending to be one workflow. then you wonder why nothing comes out clean. i ran into this on a Polymarket bot. the prediction-layer version asked Claude to do everything. it lost money. then i stripped the prompt down to one job: veto an entry i had already decided to take. nothing else. no picking, no sizing, no exit logic. over 90 days the new prompt blocked 128 trades: 44 of them would have lost me $5,360. the bot's blocked trades saved more dollars than its approved trades earned. Krieger's lesson at the product layer is the same lesson at the prompt layer. - one harness. - one job. - fewer broken abstractions stitched together. Anthropic is collapsing their stack. you can collapse yours tonight. stop stitching five jobs into one Claude call.

Anthropic's CPO just killed the boundaries between three Claude products. you should kill them inside your prompt too. Mike Krieger dropped a line most builders skipped: > "we're shipping our harness strategy, not a product." he doubled down later: the separation between the three products is "a broken abstraction we need to fix." Anthropic spent a year separating Claude AI, Cowork, and Claude Code into distinct surfaces. their own CPO now says the separation was the bug. they're collapsing it into one harness. the same abstraction is broken inside every Claude prompt you've written. you ask Claude to predict, pick, size, exit, and audit: five jobs glued together pretending to be one workflow. then you wonder why nothing comes out clean. i ran into this on a Polymarket bot. the prediction-layer version asked Claude to do everything. it lost money. then i stripped the prompt down to one job: veto an entry i had already decided to take. nothing else. no picking, no sizing, no exit logic. over 90 days the new prompt blocked 128 trades: 44 of them would have lost me $5,360. the bot's blocked trades saved more dollars than its approved trades earned. Krieger's lesson at the product layer is the same lesson at the prompt layer. - one harness. - one job. - fewer broken abstractions stitched together. Anthropic is collapsing their stack. you can collapse yours tonight. stop stitching five jobs into one Claude call.

Mnimiy

10,196 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Jensen's answer was the most grounded thing I've heard a CEO say... Sean the Science Kid asked him on the red carpet how AI can be made safer for human jobs, especially in art and music. Jensen's answer: "It is the responsibility of the industry to make sure we build AI in a safe and secure way. Just like the automotive industry built cars in a safe and secure way, airplanes, buildings and roads, electricity, healthcare." "Don't use science fiction and mysterious stories. It's not going to turn into 'I have no mouth and I must scream.' It is computers. It's software. Go engage AI. Go try ChatGPT." "Whenever I have something new that I want to learn, the first thing I do is I go to ChatGPT. It's making you and I smarter."

Jensen's answer was the most grounded thing I've heard a CEO say... Sean the Science Kid asked him on the red carpet how AI can be made safer for human jobs, especially in art and music. Jensen's answer: "It is the responsibility of the industry to make sure we build AI in a safe and secure way. Just like the automotive industry built cars in a safe and secure way, airplanes, buildings and roads, electricity, healthcare." "Don't use science fiction and mysterious stories. It's not going to turn into 'I have no mouth and I must scream.' It is computers. It's software. Go engage AI. Go try ChatGPT." "Whenever I have something new that I want to learn, the first thing I do is I go to ChatGPT. It's making you and I smarter."

Shruti

240,616 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

We are hiring engineers. From entry level through CTO. If you're excited about AI-video and advertising, this role is for you. Anyone can code. We're looking for the few who can find what's worth building. You will: - Embed with the best AI creatives and media buyers - Get paid to learn at the frontier - Ship in a week what most do in a quarter - Work with the fastest growing AI companies We're hiring globally. All skill levels. Skip the resume. DM me your work.

We are hiring engineers. From entry level through CTO. If you're excited about AI-video and advertising, this role is for you. Anyone can code. We're looking for the few who can find what's worth building. You will: - Embed with the best AI creatives and media buyers - Get paid to learn at the frontier - Ship in a week what most do in a quarter - Work with the fastest growing AI companies We're hiring globally. All skill levels. Skip the resume. DM me your work.

Rahul Bhardwaj

27,556 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

🚨Governor DeSantis MOCKS tech executives for being the most HATED people in America and getting BOOED at college graduations! “If you're running one of these companies, why would you go out and say half the people are going to lose their jobs?? “I mean, even if that's true, it's like, you wonder why people don't like you? You wonder why AI is unliked? Oh, yeah, everyone's just going to get a universal basic income. We're going to put you all on because there's not going to be jobs for people. You can understand why people don't think that's a very appetizing future!”

🚨Governor DeSantis MOCKS tech executives for being the most HATED people in America and getting BOOED at college graduations! “If you're running one of these companies, why would you go out and say half the people are going to lose their jobs?? “I mean, even if that's true, it's like, you wonder why people don't like you? You wonder why AI is unliked? Oh, yeah, everyone's just going to get a universal basic income. We're going to put you all on because there's not going to be jobs for people. You can understand why people don't think that's a very appetizing future!”

Chris Nelson 🏝️🇺🇸

70,213 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Marc Andreessen explains why AI coding won't replace programmers, but fundamentally change what they do. He argues that AI coding is just the latest abstraction layer, and the job of a programmer has always evolved with each one. Andreessen's key reframe of what's actually happening: "AI coding actually abstracts away the process of actually writing the scripting code... This is the next layer of the task redefinition under the job of programmer." He's clear that the best programmers aren't being replaced. They're already adapting, even if their day-to-day looks radically different now. Their job has shifted from writing code line by line to managing dozens of AI agents working in parallel. "The world's best programmers today will tell you, 'My job is I'm sitting there and I'm orchestrating 10 code bots running in parallel.' Their day job now is kind of arguing with the AI bots to try to get them to write the right code." But Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 is adamant this doesn't make foundational knowledge obsolete — it makes it more important. "You need to still fully understand and learn how to write and understand code, because if it doesn't work or it's not doing what you expect, you need to be able to understand the results of what the AI is giving you." He draws a direct parallel: Just as someone writing scripting languages still needs to understand how a microprocessor works, someone orchestrating AI bots needs to understand the code those bots produce. "It's this upleveling of capability where you actually want the depth to go down and understand what the thing is actually doing, even if you're not spending your day doing that by hand." The result, in his view, is transformative: "Now programmers are going to be 10 times or 100 times or a thousand times more productive. And that is overwhelmingly a good thing." The pattern: New abstraction layer emerges → tasks change → the job gets redefined upward → productivity explodes It raises a question every programmer should be sitting with... Are you building the depth to evaluate what AI gives you, or just accepting the output?

Marc Andreessen explains why AI coding won't replace programmers, but fundamentally change what they do. He argues that AI coding is just the latest abstraction layer, and the job of a programmer has always evolved with each one. Andreessen's key reframe of what's actually happening: "AI coding actually abstracts away the process of actually writing the scripting code... This is the next layer of the task redefinition under the job of programmer." He's clear that the best programmers aren't being replaced. They're already adapting, even if their day-to-day looks radically different now. Their job has shifted from writing code line by line to managing dozens of AI agents working in parallel. "The world's best programmers today will tell you, 'My job is I'm sitting there and I'm orchestrating 10 code bots running in parallel.' Their day job now is kind of arguing with the AI bots to try to get them to write the right code." But Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 is adamant this doesn't make foundational knowledge obsolete — it makes it more important. "You need to still fully understand and learn how to write and understand code, because if it doesn't work or it's not doing what you expect, you need to be able to understand the results of what the AI is giving you." He draws a direct parallel: Just as someone writing scripting languages still needs to understand how a microprocessor works, someone orchestrating AI bots needs to understand the code those bots produce. "It's this upleveling of capability where you actually want the depth to go down and understand what the thing is actually doing, even if you're not spending your day doing that by hand." The result, in his view, is transformative: "Now programmers are going to be 10 times or 100 times or a thousand times more productive. And that is overwhelmingly a good thing." The pattern: New abstraction layer emerges → tasks change → the job gets redefined upward → productivity explodes It raises a question every programmer should be sitting with... Are you building the depth to evaluate what AI gives you, or just accepting the output?

Big Brain AI

45,325 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten