正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Apple CEO Tim Cook has a counterintuitive philosophy for achieving excellence: stop following the rules entirely. "I think you should rarely follow the rules. I think you should write the rules." When asked about when it's okay to break the rules, Tim Cook reframes the question itself as flawed....

130,336 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

29 条评论

Options Surfer 的头像
Options Surfer8 个月前

@tim_cook He sucks honestly, Apple hasn’t done anything meaningful since Jobs , it’s been along time now too name a new product or innovation…

Nicholas Ryan Gonino 的头像
Nicholas Ryan Gonino8 个月前

@tim_cook Is this why autocorrect is the way it is?

sean lee 的头像
sean lee8 个月前

@tim_cook Following the rules is paying subscription fees to a life you don't even own. If your strategy is a formula, stop reading the playbook and start writing the code. 🤣

Frank 的头像
Frank8 个月前

@tim_cook Ooo big rule breaker ooo how fucking fast did he kiss the ring for Trump? Lavish gilded gifts? White House screenings of the Melania biopic the day ICE kills a citizen? @tim_cook isn’t an intrepid leader who sticks to his guns, he’s a bootlicker who bribes the Fucko in Chief.

Michael Finney 的头像
Michael Finney8 个月前

@wizardofux @tim_cook Utter nonsense from him, his entire tenure has been conformist

Deva.me 的头像
Deva.me8 个月前

@tim_cook Excellence seems less about rule-breaking and more about deeply understanding the principles well enough to know when new rules are needed.

Kai 的头像
Kai8 个月前

@tim_cook "Don't follow the rules. Write them." Most people optimize within constraints. The outliers realize the constraints themselves are negotiable. That's the difference between playing the game and changing it.

Stigmergy® 的头像
Stigmergy®8 个月前

@tim_cook 🎯💯

Working Class Hero 的头像
Working Class Hero8 个月前

@tim_cook Did Apple break the rules with Apple Vision? Or was that just a bad apple.

Roberto Croci 的头像
Roberto Croci8 个月前

@tim_cook writing your own rules isn’t about being rebellious or ignoring how things are done. It comes after you’ve spent enough time inside the system to see its limits. I’ve seen people skip the fundamentals and call it “original thinking,” and it rarely works.

Hans 的头像
Hans8 个月前

@tim_cook Like Peter theil said: Competition is for losers.

Dom 的头像
Dom8 个月前

@tim_cook ✍️ 🧬 🧢 hat👩‍🍳

Moksh M. Sharma 的头像
Moksh M. Sharma8 个月前

@tim_cook If you follow the same rulebook as your competitors, don't be surprised when you’re fighting for the same 1% of the market

Kai 的头像
Kai8 个月前

@tim_cook Tim Cook: "Don't follow the rules. Write them." Most people play within constraints. The outliers realize the constraints are negotiable. That's the difference between playing the game and changing it.

Hashim N. 的头像
Hashim N.8 个月前

@tim_cook Okay… just don’t stop on a red light 🚦 and don’t move on a green light 🚦… "I think you should rarely follow the rules. I think you should write the rules."

OSCAR MAURICIO BERISTAIN HERNANDEZ 的头像
OSCAR MAURICIO BERISTAIN HERNANDEZ8 个月前

@tim_cook Write Your own rules on not following the path everybody does , that makes sense ! 😉😉😃😃😃🌟

Esa Ruoho (Lackluster) 的头像
Esa Ruoho (Lackluster)8 个月前

@tim_cook Yeah but one part of following the rules is fixing bugs.

dzosoft 的头像
dzosoft8 个月前

@tim_cook

Neil Johnston 的头像
Neil Johnston8 个月前

@tim_cook Love breaking rules, but interested from a VC perspective - fundraising is ruled by rules. Do it your own way and you're often damned, unless you grow fast enough before needing capital

Viviane Boté 的头像
Viviane Boté8 个月前

@tim_cook Dans le fond, it is true

Cathal 的头像
Cathal8 个月前

@tim_cook Apple aren't following the rules in cork They have their own rules It's a legal requirement for companies to carry out risk assessments and provide safety statements to their employees Apple aren't carrying out these assessments Injurying employees for years assemblimg the iMac

Kai 的头像
Kai8 个月前

@tim_cook "Don't follow the rules. Write them." Most people optimize within constraints. The outliers realize the constraints themselves are negotiable.

Kees van der Plas 的头像
Kees van der Plas8 个月前

@tim_cook

Nobody's Fool 的头像
Nobody's Fool8 个月前

@tim_cook Does that also apply to the rules and policies that HR created at Apple?

nicholas ⛱ 的头像
nicholas ⛱8 个月前

@tim_cook never seen this clip

Dom 的头像
Dom8 个月前

@tim_cook ✍️🧬🧢👩‍🍳

JenniSummer 的头像
JenniSummer8 个月前

@tim_cook Jobs is turning over in his grave seeing Tim Cook suck up to Trump, Melania, and the sexual predator director of "Melania" Brett Ratner, while ICE agents murder in the streets.

Ovi96 的头像
Ovi968 个月前

@tim_cook What about his Apple EV car ? (Xiaomi and Huawei made them with success)

Göran Semb 的头像
Göran Semb8 个月前

@tim_cook Too bad about Cook also being A-OK with fascist masked goons breaking all rules and assaulting, kidnapping, and murdering people in the streets of America.

相关视频

Watch this game-changing dissertation on "expert writing." Expert writers write to "think" about the world. 99% of experts write and think at the same time. They use the writing process to help themselves think. This is how they do their best thinking. Write to think about the world. Do this because you care, because you want to be part of progress, because you want to make a dent in the universe. Write to inspire and influence. And when you are finished writing, and you click publish, think about your work this way... the intent of your text is to cause readers to change the way they think about the world. Engagement metrics don't really matter in comparison. Whether or not your text is valuable, depends on whether or not your readers perceive that you have valuably changed what they think, or what they do, or how they decide. One of the reasons it's so hard for smart people to write well is because they don't write to change the way people think about the world. They write to complete a project, to earn a grade, to be assessed. Or they write to publish *their* thoughts without going through a mental and soulful exercise of writing to think about the world, without writing to change how people think about the world. Write to think about the world. Change how people think about the world. In an era of #GenerativeAI, content isn't the end game. Your goal isn't just to get someone's attention, generate reactions, or show up in search. Your mission is to change how people think about the world. Change How People Think About the World. Thank you, Larry McEnerney (now-retired former Director of the University of Chicago's Writing Program).

Brian Solis

113,733 次观看 • 3 年前

Jordan Peterson: "If you can't fix your room, you can't fix your life" "Why should you even bother improving yourself? The answer is something like: so you don't suffer anymore stupidly than you have to. And maybe so others don't have to either. It's not some casual self-help doctrine. If you don't organize yourself properly, you'll pay for it. In a big way. And so will the people around you." Peterson continues: "You can say, 'Well, I don't care about that.' But that's actually not true, you do care about it. Because if you're in pain, you will care about it. It's very rare that you can find someone in excruciating pain who would say, 'Well, it would be no better if I was out of this.' Pain brings the idea that it would be better if it didn't exist along with it. It's incontrovertible." On how to start: "Look around for something that bothers you and see if you can fix it. You can do this in a room. Sit in your bedroom and think: 'If I wanted to spend ten minutes making this room better, what would I have to do?' You have to ask yourself that, it's a genuine question. And things will pop out. There's a stack of papers bugging you. Some rubbish behind your computer monitor you haven't attended to for six months. Cables tangled up." He explains why this matters: "If you were coming to see me for psychotherapy, the easiest thing would be to get you to organize your room. You think, is that psychotherapy? It depends on how you conceive the limits of your being. Start where you can start. If something announces itself as in need of repair that you could repair, fix it. Fix a hundred things like that, your life will be a lot different." On fixing what you repeat every day: "People tend to think of their daily routines as trivial. You get up, brush your teeth, have breakfast. Those probably constitute 50% of your life. People think, they're mundane, I don't need to pay attention to them. No, that's exactly wrong. The things you do every day are the most important things you do. Hands down. Just do the arithmetic." On staying within your competence: "Sometimes you don't know how to fix something. Imagine you're walking down the street and there's a guy who's alcoholic and schizophrenic and has been homeless for ten years. That's a problem. It would be good if you could fix it, but you haven't got a clue. You walk around that and go find something you could fix. Just because something announces itself as in need of repair doesn't mean it's you, right then and there, who should repair it. You have to have some humility. You don't walk up to a helicopter that isn't working and just start tinkering away." Peterson shares the key insight: "As soon as you give your mind a genuine aim, it'll reconfigure the world in keeping with that aim. That's actually how you see to begin with. You've all seen the video where you watch basketballs being tossed back and forth, and while you're doing that, a gorilla walks into the middle of the video and you don't see it. If you thought about that experiment for five years, that would be about the right amount of time to spend thinking about it." He explains what it reveals: "What it shows you is that you see what you aim at. If you can get one thing through your head, that would be a good one. You see what you aim at. One inference you might draw from that is: be careful what you aim at. What you aim at determines the way the world manifests itself to you. So if the world is manifesting itself in a very negative way, one thing to ask is: are you aiming at the right thing?"

Jaynit

68,915 次观看 • 6 个月前

Pavel Durov on why he hasn't had depression in 20 years: "I normally never have depression. I don't remember having depression in the last 20 years, at least maybe when I was a teenager." Pavel's approach to difficult emotions is completely counterintuitive. As he puts it: "I'm a human being like everybody else. I do get to experience emotions and some of them are not very pleasant. But I believe that it's the responsibility of every one of us to cope with these emotions and to learn to work through them." On what creates depression: "Self-discipline is particularly important because without it, how can you overcome this seemingly endless loop of negativity or despair that ultimately leads to depression for some people?" His method: "One of the reasons I don't have depression is I start doing things. I identify the problem, I can see a solution, and I start executing the strategy. If you are stuck in this loop of being worried about something, nothing's ever going to change." The mistake people make: "People often make this mistake thinking 'Oh, I should just have some rest and then regain energy.' This is not how it works. You gain energy by doing something. So you start doing something, then it happens. You feel motivated, you feel inspired, and then ultimately you do something else a little bit more." He continues: "The whole point is to do first and then feel, not feel and then do. Going to the gym is a good example. There are many days when you don't want to start working out. But you have to overcome this initial reluctance and then you get to a point that you enjoy it and you think 'Oh my god, it was such a good idea to come to gym today.'" Action creates energy, not the other way around.

Jaynit

547,702 次观看 • 9 个月前

Google co-founder Larry Page on why aiming bigger is often easier than playing it safe: He shares a philosophy he picked up early on that shaped how he thinks about ambition and goal-setting: "I went to a leadership seminar once in Michigan where I came from and they have this great slogan which is have a healthy disregard for the impossible." He explains what that actually means in practice: "You should set really stretched goals that you're not sure you can achieve but are sort of reasonable. You don't want completely outlandish goals." Then he shares the counterintuitive insight that took him by surprise when he was building Google: "One thing that I didn't quite realize when I was starting Google is that it's often easier to have aggressive goals." Most people assume the opposite. They pick smaller, safer targets because they seem more attainable. But Larry argues that approach actually works against you: "A lot of times people pick very specific things they want to do because they think they'll be easier to attain. And what happens if you're being more specific, smaller markets, that kind of thing, you also get less resources." The real question isn't how much you need to get started. It's whether your idea holds up: "The question is, can you make a really good case for what you're doing? Does it make sense? Do you have a really big advantage?" He gives a concrete example: "If you're building robots that are 10 times less complicated than your competitors, that's probably a good business, right? And maybe it takes a lot of money to get started up, maybe it's easier than doing something simpler." Larry's closing point reframes the entire premise: "It's okay to solve a hard problem. That's why you get paid if you're a company."

Big Brain Business

11,961 次观看 • 4 个月前

Chamath: "Nvidia is not doing what's in the best interest of the United States." 🇺🇸🇨🇳 "I think we can all do the math. About 47% of all of NVIDIA's revenue goes to China and Chinese-related countries." "And I think when you peel back this onion, what you will find is a whole raft of companies that were stood up to buy these Nvidia GPUs to essentially act as a waystation for China." "And I think that is the big problem." "Let's have a thought starter: if 47% of all of the AI capability and horsepower is being shipped to three Asian countries, where do you think the apps that require that amount of horsepower live?" "Is there a Cursor of Bhutan that we did not know? Is there a great shopping app in Cambodia that's come out of nowhere, that's AI powered?" "I think the answer is no." "Every single time we have an advance in the United States, how is it that Alibaba shows up with something incredible? DeepSeek shows up with something better?" "At every turn and at every step of AI, they are at the same rate or one step ahead." "To be honest with you, I think the real problem that we have is that Nvidia is not doing what is in the best interest of the United States." "You have a American company that has been working around the guidelines at every turn to try to land silicon into the hands of China." "Late last year, they introduced this thing called the H20 that was explicitly designed for China and to be compliant with US rules at the time." "Which again, gives these guys substantial performance." "This is a case where (Nvidia) has plausible deniability. I sell something to a Singaporean registered company? Plausible deniability." "What am I supposed to do? You can't expect me to audit it. I think that's what NVIDIA's answer will be to this question." "But what is the real expectation? At a minimum, the United States should have a mechanism to understand it." "It is implausible that if you did one or two layers of work, you would not find that most of this traffic is being used by Chinese organizations."

The All-In Podcast

910,450 次观看 • 1 年前