Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

AppleScript is the oldest way to drive a Mac. Frontier models butcher it. So we trained two small ones that don't. Open weights. On-device. 100% compile.

Osaurus

10,350 subscribers

54,111 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Using the "Control your Mac" connector with Claude Cowork is so nice. It's an AppleScript MCP that lets Claude control Mac apps and system functions Finally found a good way to prompt Apple Keynote slides!

Using the "Control your Mac" connector with Claude Cowork is so nice. It's an AppleScript MCP that lets Claude control Mac apps and system functions Finally found a good way to prompt Apple Keynote slides!

Lydia Hallie ✨

192,882 views • 10 months ago

This is wild. Google just dropped Gemma 4. Apache 2.0, open weights, frontier models that run on phones, laptops, and desktops👇

This is wild. Google just dropped Gemma 4. Apache 2.0, open weights, frontier models that run on phones, laptops, and desktops👇

Min Choi

93,501 views • 7 months ago

$WDC CEO says storage demand and requirement compound and grow whether AI runs on US frontier models or cheaper open-source ones. "Whether it's the traditional frontier models that you've seen in the U.S. that are premium-based, or some of the new open-source, more economical models, the underlying requirement is still that they're going to require a lot of data to support the training of these models." "These models are going to generate a lot more data that requires storage for us." "So we view it as very positive, because even as compute maybe drives greater efficiency in terms of compute and memory resources, the requirement for storage is just going to compound and grow." "So we view it very positively for demand going forward."

$WDC CEO says storage demand and requirement compound and grow whether AI runs on US frontier models or cheaper open-source ones. "Whether it's the traditional frontier models that you've seen in the U.S. that are premium-based, or some of the new open-source, more economical models, the underlying requirement is still that they're going to require a lot of data to support the training of these models." "These models are going to generate a lot more data that requires storage for us." "So we view it as very positive, because even as compute maybe drives greater efficiency in terms of compute and memory resources, the requirement for storage is just going to compound and grow." "So we view it very positively for demand going forward."

Fireside Alpha

14,114 views • 3 months ago

You don't need a trillion-parameter model that understands physics to answer a customer support call. But that's not even the main reason we build small models. The real one: LLMs store everything. Literally everything all of it sitting in the weights. Humans don't work that way, and your agent shouldn't either. Full podcast, link in thread.

You don't need a trillion-parameter model that understands physics to answer a customer support call. But that's not even the main reason we build small models. The real one: LLMs store everything. Literally everything all of it sitting in the weights. Humans don't work that way, and your agent shouldn't either. Full podcast, link in thread.

Sudarshan Kamath

19,999 views • 3 months ago

.L3Harris says Palantir helped them beat frontier AI models in less than 2 days, at 95% lower cost: "When we fine-tuned open source models trained on our own data, we were able to outperform the frontier models in less than 48 hours." "The cost of our fine-tuned open source model was 95% lower than the frontier models we were using." "AI is a commodity. It's all about the data. We view our data as a corporate asset. It's our unique hard-earned knowledge." "We believe American defense companies should not be a vassal for frontier AI labs, handing over our data and institutional knowledge, hoping to rent back the intelligence it creates." " We own the model, we own the compute, we own the advantage."

.L3Harris says Palantir helped them beat frontier AI models in less than 2 days, at 95% lower cost: "When we fine-tuned open source models trained on our own data, we were able to outperform the frontier models in less than 48 hours." "The cost of our fine-tuned open source model was 95% lower than the frontier models we were using." "AI is a commodity. It's all about the data. We view our data as a corporate asset. It's our unique hard-earned knowledge." "We believe American defense companies should not be a vassal for frontier AI labs, handing over our data and institutional knowledge, hoping to rent back the intelligence it creates." " We own the model, we own the compute, we own the advantage."

Jawwwn

1,108,745 views • 2 months ago

You can run local AI models up to 120B without a $10,000 Mac Studio This phone-sized device is your own server for open-source models. 100% local and private. And you can use it to: - Power an agent like OpenClaw 24/7 - Completely replace a chatbot - Literally anything that requires an API It’s called Tiiny, and, once again, you can run the latest open-source models on it. Link below

You can run local AI models up to 120B without a $10,000 Mac Studio This phone-sized device is your own server for open-source models. 100% local and private. And you can use it to: - Power an agent like OpenClaw 24/7 - Completely replace a chatbot - Literally anything that requires an API It’s called Tiiny, and, once again, you can run the latest open-source models on it. Link below

Paul Couvert

41,413 views • 8 months ago

We are releasing Ultramarine 1 Flash, a frontier-class model built for knowledge work. It is open-source and achieves similar performance to Fable 5, while being 60x cheaper. It was post-trained by a team of 5 for ~$300k all-in. Available on API now, with weights releasing in 2 weeks.

We are releasing Ultramarine 1 Flash, a frontier-class model built for knowledge work. It is open-source and achieves similar performance to Fable 5, while being 60x cheaper. It was post-trained by a team of 5 for ~$300k all-in. Available on API now, with weights releasing in 2 weeks.

Daanish Khazi

1,756,024 views • 1 month ago

ComfyUI is now the first and only commercial license distributor for MiniMax (official)'s generative media models. MiniMax open weights have been downloaded through Comfy close to 20 million times. Not one of those downloads paid the lab a cent. That is the open-weight problem. Training frontier models is expensive. Adoption is not revenue. If open models are going to keep pace with the biggest closed labs, the labs need a way to get paid. So we built the bridge. Enterprises, studios, and agencies license through us. The labs get incentive to keep researching. Independent creators keep building exactly as they do now, funded by the organizations with budgets. A license only gets you the model. Our Forward Deployed Creatives embed with your team, train LoRAs on your style, build production workflows in your environment, and leave your people able to run and extend all of it. What they build is yours to keep. MiniMax is where we start, not where we stop. My assertion is that open-weight labs that survive the next two years will not be the ones with the best benchmarks. They will be the ones that solve distribution to paying customers first. Try for Free | Request a License today ⬇️

ComfyUI is now the first and only commercial license distributor for MiniMax (official)'s generative media models. MiniMax open weights have been downloaded through Comfy close to 20 million times. Not one of those downloads paid the lab a cent. That is the open-weight problem. Training frontier models is expensive. Adoption is not revenue. If open models are going to keep pace with the biggest closed labs, the labs need a way to get paid. So we built the bridge. Enterprises, studios, and agencies license through us. The labs get incentive to keep researching. Independent creators keep building exactly as they do now, funded by the organizations with budgets. A license only gets you the model. Our Forward Deployed Creatives embed with your team, train LoRAs on your style, build production workflows in your environment, and leave your people able to run and extend all of it. What they build is yours to keep. MiniMax is where we start, not where we stop. My assertion is that open-weight labs that survive the next two years will not be the ones with the best benchmarks. They will be the ones that solve distribution to paying customers first. Try for Free | Request a License today ⬇️

Yoland Yan

15,038 views • 2 months ago

America is about to lose the AI race, and it will not happen at the frontier. It will happen at the floor. Everyone is watching who ships the smartest model. The actual war is over the 80% of tokens nobody posts about: the routine inference that quietly runs the world. On current trajectory, that fight is already lost. Watch what people do, not what they say. Coinbase just defaulted its own engineers off frontier models onto open weights and cut AI spend nearly in half while usage kept climbing. Even NVIDIA runs a closed frontier model as an orchestrator and pushes the volume to its own open weights. The frontier is becoming a router. The volume goes open. That part is settled. Here is the part that should terrify Washington: the only credible open tier today is Chinese. GLM. Kimi. And the US answer is to tighten export controls and freeze its own labs in place, as if you can embargo a file that is already downloaded, or price-match free. So China hands the Global South Huawei hardware and free open models, and a generation in Africa and Southeast Asia learns to reason through a model that will not tell them what happened at Tiananmen Square. That is not a cost story. That is influence through inference. You do not have to win hearts and minds when you supply the mind. Open source is not a nice-to-have for America. It is the whole ballgame for the 80%, and right now the US is barely on the field. We need American open weights. Not eventually. Now.

America is about to lose the AI race, and it will not happen at the frontier. It will happen at the floor. Everyone is watching who ships the smartest model. The actual war is over the 80% of tokens nobody posts about: the routine inference that quietly runs the world. On current trajectory, that fight is already lost. Watch what people do, not what they say. Coinbase just defaulted its own engineers off frontier models onto open weights and cut AI spend nearly in half while usage kept climbing. Even NVIDIA runs a closed frontier model as an orchestrator and pushes the volume to its own open weights. The frontier is becoming a router. The volume goes open. That part is settled. Here is the part that should terrify Washington: the only credible open tier today is Chinese. GLM. Kimi. And the US answer is to tighten export controls and freeze its own labs in place, as if you can embargo a file that is already downloaded, or price-match free. So China hands the Global South Huawei hardware and free open models, and a generation in Africa and Southeast Asia learns to reason through a model that will not tell them what happened at Tiananmen Square. That is not a cost story. That is influence through inference. You do not have to win hearts and minds when you supply the mind. Open source is not a nice-to-have for America. It is the whole ballgame for the 80%, and right now the US is barely on the field. We need American open weights. Not eventually. Now.

Ben Pouladian

71,722 views • 4 months ago

.Decagon co-founder and CTO Ashwin Sreenivas says the choice between expensive frontier models and cheaper, less capable ones is a false trade-off: "Even if you have a 'dumber model,' you can get it to higher performance on that specific task." "When we fine-tune smaller, dumber models, it's that they're just not as general purpose, but on the specific task we want them to do, they actually outperform the large, smart, state-of-the-art models." "So we end up getting all three things. It is better at the task, it is cheaper, and it is faster." Ashwin Sreenivas

.Decagon co-founder and CTO Ashwin Sreenivas says the choice between expensive frontier models and cheaper, less capable ones is a false trade-off: "Even if you have a 'dumber model,' you can get it to higher performance on that specific task." "When we fine-tune smaller, dumber models, it's that they're just not as general purpose, but on the specific task we want them to do, they actually outperform the large, smart, state-of-the-art models." "So we end up getting all three things. It is better at the task, it is cheaper, and it is faster." Ashwin Sreenivas

a16z

36,122 views • 3 months ago

Fibo 2.0 is live: the #1 open-weights image editing model on Artificial Analysis. Ahead of 33 closed models from leading labs, and trained only on licensed data. Try it in Bria Create:

Fibo 2.0 is live: the #1 open-weights image editing model on Artificial Analysis. Ahead of 33 closed models from leading labs, and trained only on licensed data. Try it in Bria Create:

BRIA AI

19,110 views • 25 days ago

French President Macron on AI: The problem is these frontier models: we need to better control them so they don't fall into the hands of authoritarian regimes that may threaten the cybersecurity of our societies.

French President Macron on AI: The problem is these frontier models: we need to better control them so they don't fall into the hands of authoritarian regimes that may threaten the cybersecurity of our societies.

Clash Report

18,270 views • 5 months ago

Jensen says Open Source can be MORE expensive for enterprises, Brad Gerstner explains why: Brad Gerstner: “Over the last two weeks, everybody's been saying that the Chinese have caught up, that open source tokens have caught up in intelligence, that they're much cheaper, etc. And Elon comes out and says, ‘Not so fast. We're entering the singularity, and the frontier models are way further ahead than people think.’ I believe that to be true. And then Jensen came out this week and said, ‘Closed models are actually cheaper if you don't have to build it for yourself, the training costs, and a lot of expertise to fine-tune, and maintain, and guardrail, and keep it safe. So he's basically making the argument that not only are the frontier models further ahead, but that the cost differential between the two is not what everybody's making it out to be, which I think explains why (closed models) continue to run away with it on the revenue side of the equation. For the vast majority of use cases, I think token consumption is going up for the open source guys, while share of economics is going up for the frontier labs. I think that's what we want to see.” $NVDA

Jensen says Open Source can be MORE expensive for enterprises, Brad Gerstner explains why: Brad Gerstner: “Over the last two weeks, everybody's been saying that the Chinese have caught up, that open source tokens have caught up in intelligence, that they're much cheaper, etc. And Elon comes out and says, ‘Not so fast. We're entering the singularity, and the frontier models are way further ahead than people think.’ I believe that to be true. And then Jensen came out this week and said, ‘Closed models are actually cheaper if you don't have to build it for yourself, the training costs, and a lot of expertise to fine-tune, and maintain, and guardrail, and keep it safe. So he's basically making the argument that not only are the frontier models further ahead, but that the cost differential between the two is not what everybody's making it out to be, which I think explains why (closed models) continue to run away with it on the revenue side of the equation. For the vast majority of use cases, I think token consumption is going up for the open source guys, while share of economics is going up for the frontier labs. I think that's what we want to see.” $NVDA

The All-In Podcast

62,394 views • 3 months ago

We put together a $1.1B round for River AI to build American leadership in open weights. Frontier labs push the boundary of humanity, but open weights empower humanity, putting intelligence into everyone's hands. Igor Babuschkin has built frontier capability three times over. Now he's making it something you can own.

We put together a $1.1B round for River AI to build American leadership in open weights. Frontier labs push the boundary of humanity, but open weights empower humanity, putting intelligence into everyone's hands. Igor Babuschkin has built frontier capability three times over. Now he's making it something you can own.

Hemant Taneja

56,349 views • 3 months ago

Hacktron founder s1r1us on why frontier models are still far ahead of open models for real-world hacking: "The frontier models are insanely capable. There's a huge gap. You don't even want to use Kimi K3 when you have access to GPT 5.6." "We can't really use Opus 5 anymore. Every time there's a new model release, you kind of don't want to work with the previous model." "Open models, we don't really use them. It's incredibly hard to hand hold them to do the exploitation. They're not yet there." Hacktron AI Harsh Jaiswal

Hacktron founder s1r1us on why frontier models are still far ahead of open models for real-world hacking: "The frontier models are insanely capable. There's a huge gap. You don't even want to use Kimi K3 when you have access to GPT 5.6." "We can't really use Opus 5 anymore. Every time there's a new model release, you kind of don't want to work with the previous model." "Open models, we don't really use them. It's incredibly hard to hand hold them to do the exploitation. They're not yet there." Hacktron AI Harsh Jaiswal

MTS

15,189 views • 1 month ago

"It all comes down to compute." Dmitri Alperovitch from Silverado Policy Accelerator explains: "The single most important input to winning is compute the processing power used to train and run AI models. Let me say that plainly, because it is defining that everything that congress and this committee do on AI policy. The binding constraint in this competition is not talent, it is not data, and it is not cash. Both the United States and China have talented researchers and financial resources, and we have learned that frontier models trained on generic data routinely outperform smaller models, trained on more specialized inputs. It all comes down to compute."

"It all comes down to compute." Dmitri Alperovitch from Silverado Policy Accelerator explains: "The single most important input to winning is compute the processing power used to train and run AI models. Let me say that plainly, because it is defining that everything that congress and this committee do on AI policy. The binding constraint in this competition is not talent, it is not data, and it is not cash. Both the United States and China have talented researchers and financial resources, and we have learned that frontier models trained on generic data routinely outperform smaller models, trained on more specialized inputs. It all comes down to compute."

Select Committee on China

41,578 views • 7 months ago

Jensen Huang was asked whether AI's future is open source or proprietary the question the whole industry keeps fighting over. He didn't pick a side. He said something that quietly ends the fight. "models is a technology, not a product. Model is a technology, not a service" "For the vast majority of consumers, the horizontal layer, the general intelligence, I would really, really love not to go fine-tune my own" "all these industries, their domain expertise, their specialization has to be channeled, has to be captured in a way that they can control, and that it can only come from open models" "the open model industry we're contributing tremendously to it is near the frontier" Everyone else is arguing about which lab wins OpenAI or Anthropic, who has the smartest frontier model this quarter. Jensen is standing on stage saying that's the sideshow. The proprietary model is the convenience layer you rent when you don't care. The open model is the thing you own when the work is yours. Two different products for two different needs not two horses in one race. open models are the second-biggest in the room. Ahead of Anthropic. Behind only OpenAI.

Jensen Huang was asked whether AI's future is open source or proprietary the question the whole industry keeps fighting over. He didn't pick a side. He said something that quietly ends the fight. "models is a technology, not a product. Model is a technology, not a service" "For the vast majority of consumers, the horizontal layer, the general intelligence, I would really, really love not to go fine-tune my own" "all these industries, their domain expertise, their specialization has to be channeled, has to be captured in a way that they can control, and that it can only come from open models" "the open model industry we're contributing tremendously to it is near the frontier" Everyone else is arguing about which lab wins OpenAI or Anthropic, who has the smartest frontier model this quarter. Jensen is standing on stage saying that's the sideshow. The proprietary model is the convenience layer you rent when you don't care. The open model is the thing you own when the work is yours. Two different products for two different needs not two horses in one race. open models are the second-biggest in the room. Ahead of Anthropic. Behind only OpenAI.

Vikram M

12,078 views • 3 months ago

Here's a quick walk-through of the Mac app I built over the holidays. It's a Jules companion app using the Gemini public APIs. I'm open-sourcing the code so that you can compile it, extend it, and learn from it.

Here's a quick walk-through of the Mac app I built over the holidays. It's a Jules companion app using the Gemini public APIs. I'm open-sourcing the code so that you can compile it, extend it, and learn from it.

Kath Korevec

44,395 views • 9 months ago

David Sacks says companies are trapped paying OpenAI & Anthropic because they can't figure out how to use open source models "I think enterprise CTOs would like to shift their token consumption to cheaper models for the obvious reason that it would be more efficient. They are seeing compute costs or token costs skyrocket right now, so everyone's trying to figure this out." "You also have the AI sovereignty issue that Alex Karp talked about. They're worried about giving up the secret sauce or the alpha in their business to a frontier lab that may one day be competing with them. "The problem is, I think in most cases, they don't have the technical ability to do it. Coinbase figured out how to do it. DoorDash figured out how to do it. They built a token routing system that allows them to send frontier tasks to frontier models and non frontier tasks to more mundane models. But I don't think your average enterprise has the technical capability to do that." "This is why the share of wallet of closed models, it actually increased. I think that open source went from 19% last year to 11% this year. So open source as a share of enterprise spending is actually decreasing." "I don't think that means usage is decreasing. I think usage is skyrocketing. It also may be the case that because the whole point of using an open model is you just pay for the compute costs, you don't have to pay a lab, so it may be that it's hard to measure that usage in terms of spend." "But nonetheless, anyone who's saying that these closed models are going to lose or are somehow losing, you're just not seeing it in the data."

David Sacks says companies are trapped paying OpenAI & Anthropic because they can't figure out how to use open source models "I think enterprise CTOs would like to shift their token consumption to cheaper models for the obvious reason that it would be more efficient. They are seeing compute costs or token costs skyrocket right now, so everyone's trying to figure this out." "You also have the AI sovereignty issue that Alex Karp talked about. They're worried about giving up the secret sauce or the alpha in their business to a frontier lab that may one day be competing with them. "The problem is, I think in most cases, they don't have the technical ability to do it. Coinbase figured out how to do it. DoorDash figured out how to do it. They built a token routing system that allows them to send frontier tasks to frontier models and non frontier tasks to more mundane models. But I don't think your average enterprise has the technical capability to do that." "This is why the share of wallet of closed models, it actually increased. I think that open source went from 19% last year to 11% this year. So open source as a share of enterprise spending is actually decreasing." "I don't think that means usage is decreasing. I think usage is skyrocketing. It also may be the case that because the whole point of using an open model is you just pay for the compute costs, you don't have to pay a lab, so it may be that it's hard to measure that usage in terms of spend." "But nonetheless, anyone who's saying that these closed models are going to lose or are somehow losing, you're just not seeing it in the data."

dnap

141,614 views • 4 months ago