正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

ARC-AGI-3 is built different, it has dumbfounded almost all regular attempts so far because it's so much harder than anything that came before. It has no rules, it's agentic and has no explicit goals, they need to be discovered. Tufalabs won the first milestone of ARC Prize > There...

MLStreetTalk's profile picture

Machine Learning Street Talk

39,083 subscribers

33,410 次观看 • 14 天前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This is the first stage. We are now in a situation where it's 10 and 10 plus 20 for fentanyl, so 30% tariffs in the US of China goods coming in, and they can get rid of 20% of it if they solve the fentanyl problem. That they will do with certainty. But we’re not finished there and neither are millions of small entrepreneurs in America that I represent. We need IP law to be finally put into place so that our products and services are protected in their markets the way we protect theirs and ours. So, reciprocal playing field is where we need to go. This is a great first step but it's only the beginning. I want to sell to the Chinese people. I have no problem with them. I have a big problem with their government. They don't abide by the rules. We've known that for a long time and no admin has dealt with China, even after they came into the World Trade Organization in 2000. They've breached every covenant of that agreement so it's important for us to set the tone in terms of how we're going to go forward with China.
2:50

This is the first stage. We are now in a situation where it's 10 and 10 plus 20 for fentanyl, so 30% tariffs in the US of China goods coming in, and they can get rid of 20% of it if they solve the fentanyl problem. That they will do with certainty. But we’re not finished there and neither are millions of small entrepreneurs in America that I represent. We need IP law to be finally put into place so that our products and services are protected in their markets the way we protect theirs and ours. So, reciprocal playing field is where we need to go. This is a great first step but it's only the beginning. I want to sell to the Chinese people. I have no problem with them. I have a big problem with their government. They don't abide by the rules. We've known that for a long time and no admin has dealt with China, even after they came into the World Trade Organization in 2000. They've breached every covenant of that agreement so it's important for us to set the tone in terms of how we're going to go forward with China.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

50,194 次观看 • 1 年前

ARC-AGI is redefining how to measure progress on the path to AGI - focusing on reasoning, generalization, and adaptability instead of memorization or scale. At NeurIPS 2025, YC's Diana sat down with ARC Prize President Greg Kamradt to find out why most AI benchmarks fail, how ARC-AGI reveals the limits of today’s models, and why measuring intelligence may be harder than building it. 00:11 — What ARC Prize is and why it exists 00:38 — François Chollet’s definition of AGI 01:48 — What ARC-AGI Actually Tests 02:25 — When LLMs Failed the ARC Benchmark 03:38 — ARC-AGI Becomes the Standard 04:49 — False Positives in AI Progress 06:06 — The Evolution of ARC-AGI 08:55 — Measuring Intelligence beyond just accuracy 10:25 — What happens if a model solves ARC-AGI?
11:59

ARC-AGI is redefining how to measure progress on the path to AGI - focusing on reasoning, generalization, and adaptability instead of memorization or scale. At NeurIPS 2025, YC's Diana sat down with ARC Prize President Greg Kamradt to find out why most AI benchmarks fail, how ARC-AGI reveals the limits of today’s models, and why measuring intelligence may be harder than building it. 00:11 — What ARC Prize is and why it exists 00:38 — François Chollet’s definition of AGI 01:48 — What ARC-AGI Actually Tests 02:25 — When LLMs Failed the ARC Benchmark 03:38 — ARC-AGI Becomes the Standard 04:49 — False Positives in AI Progress 06:06 — The Evolution of ARC-AGI 08:55 — Measuring Intelligence beyond just accuracy 10:25 — What happens if a model solves ARC-AGI?

Y Combinator

98,369 次观看 • 7 个月前

#MakeAFortuneWithCantonFair | As the #CantonFair has come to its 136th edition, it's no surprise that there will be many old friends! We caught up with some of them at the venue and asked them to share their stories. For them, the Canton Fair is not just about business but also the #friendships they've built over the years. Canton Fair
3:05

#MakeAFortuneWithCantonFair | As the #CantonFair has come to its 136th edition, it's no surprise that there will be many old friends! We caught up with some of them at the venue and asked them to share their stories. For them, the Canton Fair is not just about business but also the #friendships they've built over the years. Canton Fair

Hi,GBA

20,405 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 FRANCOIS CHOLLET SAYS THE CURRENT LLM STACK IS THE WRONG PATH TO AGI Interviewer: “When will we accomplish the first definition of AGI?” Chollet confirms we are already on that exact trajectory, pointing out that: "Current technology can fully automate at human level or beyond any domain where you have verifiable rewards, right? And code... code being the first one." He then brings up the problem with LLMs, stating that: "It's possible in principle to build something that looks a lot like AGI on top of the LLM stack... I do believe, however, this would be the wrong thing to do because it would be very inefficient." Looking ahead to what the final architecture will actually require, he explains that: "AI research will have to trend towards not just efficiency, but in fact optimality over time. And for this reason, future AI in a few decades... it's not going to be this harness on top of a reasoning model on top of a base LLM."
1:41

🚨 FRANCOIS CHOLLET SAYS THE CURRENT LLM STACK IS THE WRONG PATH TO AGI Interviewer: “When will we accomplish the first definition of AGI?” Chollet confirms we are already on that exact trajectory, pointing out that: "Current technology can fully automate at human level or beyond any domain where you have verifiable rewards, right? And code... code being the first one." He then brings up the problem with LLMs, stating that: "It's possible in principle to build something that looks a lot like AGI on top of the LLM stack... I do believe, however, this would be the wrong thing to do because it would be very inefficient." Looking ahead to what the final architecture will actually require, he explains that: "AI research will have to trend towards not just efficiency, but in fact optimality over time. And for this reason, future AI in a few decades... it's not going to be this harness on top of a reasoning model on top of a base LLM."

Chris

15,578 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 NEW: Anthropic released shocking revenue numbers. They now have over 1,000 enterprises paying $1M+ annually: "It turns out that the TAM for intelligence is radically different than anything that we've seen before... It's not that there was some great go-to-market in Anthropic that all of a sudden they snuck up and blew everybody away. No, it was companies demanding the product. They're getting throttled on the product. Why? Because it's so good. It makes them better at their business. We are all self-interested actors. And when millions of those people are all making the same decision, there's a huge tell. And the tell here is that the TAM is as big as Dario and Sam and others have been saying." -Brad Gerstner "This is truly mind-boggling when you think about it because those are the most coveted customers in the world... Slack dreamed of getting these million-dollar customers. Salesforce dreams of getting these million-dollar customers." -@jason
3:09

🚨 NEW: Anthropic released shocking revenue numbers. They now have over 1,000 enterprises paying $1M+ annually: "It turns out that the TAM for intelligence is radically different than anything that we've seen before... It's not that there was some great go-to-market in Anthropic that all of a sudden they snuck up and blew everybody away. No, it was companies demanding the product. They're getting throttled on the product. Why? Because it's so good. It makes them better at their business. We are all self-interested actors. And when millions of those people are all making the same decision, there's a huge tell. And the tell here is that the TAM is as big as Dario and Sam and others have been saying." -Brad Gerstner "This is truly mind-boggling when you think about it because those are the most coveted customers in the world... Slack dreamed of getting these million-dollar customers. Salesforce dreams of getting these million-dollar customers." -@jason

bg2clips

36,634 次观看 • 2 个月前

In America “We currently have 4 states in which they allow Muslim mosque to play prayer over loudspeaker 5x a day from their mosque” - Minnesota - Michigan - New York - New Jersey The number of mosques is rapidly expanding in 2025 - Texas has the second most number of mosques built already and will probably be number one by the end of the year - The population in Texas is half or less than half of what it is in Jersey, where it's the highest Muslim population “So why are there so many being built here in Texas if the population is not that great? Because it's an open call to come.” It’s not just Texas, all over America mosques are being built at an alarming pace
1:27

In America “We currently have 4 states in which they allow Muslim mosque to play prayer over loudspeaker 5x a day from their mosque” - Minnesota - Michigan - New York - New Jersey The number of mosques is rapidly expanding in 2025 - Texas has the second most number of mosques built already and will probably be number one by the end of the year - The population in Texas is half or less than half of what it is in Jersey, where it's the highest Muslim population “So why are there so many being built here in Texas if the population is not that great? Because it's an open call to come.” It’s not just Texas, all over America mosques are being built at an alarming pace

Wall Street Apes

182,763 次观看 • 1 年前

Asmongold says Democrats have zero defense against the far left because their entire party is built on emotional blackmail "Democrats have literally no defense against people like this because they've built their entire party and all of their ideology around virtue signaling. It's completely built around virtue signaling, emotional messaging, and other forms of emotional guilt tripping and emotional blackmail." "So the moment the DSA goes even farther with the emotional blackmail, the moment they go even farther with the guilt tripping, Democrats have no choice but to acquiesce and enable them. Because that's the only value they have."
0:41

Asmongold says Democrats have zero defense against the far left because their entire party is built on emotional blackmail "Democrats have literally no defense against people like this because they've built their entire party and all of their ideology around virtue signaling. It's completely built around virtue signaling, emotional messaging, and other forms of emotional guilt tripping and emotional blackmail." "So the moment the DSA goes even farther with the emotional blackmail, the moment they go even farther with the guilt tripping, Democrats have no choice but to acquiesce and enable them. Because that's the only value they have."

Asmongold Updates

27,215 次观看 • 11 天前

🚨 DONALD TRUMP REVEALS IRAN MUST SAY 'WE GIVE UP' AND IT'S OVER "Now they have to CRY UNCLE! That's all they have to do just say 'we give up. We give up.' But their economy is really in trouble. It's a dead economy." "The blockade is GENIUS, OK? The blockade has been a hundred percent foolproof!" "It shows how good our Navy is. I can tell you that nobody's gonna play games." "We have the greatest military in the world and I built much of it during my first term and we've been building it since and the greatest anywhere in the world, nobody even close and and you see that everything whether it's Venezuela which and they have a good military in Venezuela, but it was over in one day." "It was actually over in about 48 minutes. Iran the same thing." "Militarily we've wiped them out. They have no military left it there. It's all the Navy's at the bottom of the sea." "The Air Force is never gonna fly again. We've got an amazing military." Rapid Response 47
0:58

🚨 DONALD TRUMP REVEALS IRAN MUST SAY 'WE GIVE UP' AND IT'S OVER "Now they have to CRY UNCLE! That's all they have to do just say 'we give up. We give up.' But their economy is really in trouble. It's a dead economy." "The blockade is GENIUS, OK? The blockade has been a hundred percent foolproof!" "It shows how good our Navy is. I can tell you that nobody's gonna play games." "We have the greatest military in the world and I built much of it during my first term and we've been building it since and the greatest anywhere in the world, nobody even close and and you see that everything whether it's Venezuela which and they have a good military in Venezuela, but it was over in one day." "It was actually over in about 48 minutes. Iran the same thing." "Militarily we've wiped them out. They have no military left it there. It's all the Navy's at the bottom of the sea." "The Air Force is never gonna fly again. We've got an amazing military." Rapid Response 47

Eric Daugherty

173,185 次观看 • 2 个月前

The Devastating Affects Of The Idaho Farmland Water Shutoff 🚨 UPDATE: “I've talked to the Governor, and the Governor's position is he can't do anything about this” “The, the Department of Water Resources, in the governor's office has sent out the order that they gotta close their wells. That is really a tough deal because these farmers have already planted, the timing on this is horrible. It costs $2,000 an acre to plant potatoes or more, dollars 2,000 to 3,000. Um, and now they have to shut down the wells and give up that investment. Their land is mortgaged, the potato crops are mortgaged, everything's financed, they will basically lose their farms if they turn their water off. We're having one of the best water years that we've had in the last decade. There's more water than they know what to do with. In this kind of a year, they're deciding that they're going to close down 500,000 acres because of because of the new formula that have been introduced on the prerogative, I guess, of the Department of of Water Resources. None of it makes any sense. So they would say they're following through with this agreement that they had put in place a few years ago, and the farmers should have known. I've talked to the governor, and the governor's position is he can't do anything about this because it's mentioned in the constitution and the supreme court has weighed in, but honestly, when I talk to the attorneys they're saying that's that's not a truthful version of what the facts are. The governor's office has a whole lot of prerogative, the Department of Water Resources has the prerogative on how to interpret these laws. By the way, the law does give priority to the folks that have senior water rights, so that's parcelled true. But the governor, I'm gonna plead that the governor exercised leadership here and that the legislature exercise some leadership and put, build some framework. What we need to have them do is build some framework around these agreements and around the laws so that, um, we don't lose all of our agriculture in this area and that appears to be the plan.”
1:59

The Devastating Affects Of The Idaho Farmland Water Shutoff 🚨 UPDATE: “I've talked to the Governor, and the Governor's position is he can't do anything about this” “The, the Department of Water Resources, in the governor's office has sent out the order that they gotta close their wells. That is really a tough deal because these farmers have already planted, the timing on this is horrible. It costs $2,000 an acre to plant potatoes or more, dollars 2,000 to 3,000. Um, and now they have to shut down the wells and give up that investment. Their land is mortgaged, the potato crops are mortgaged, everything's financed, they will basically lose their farms if they turn their water off. We're having one of the best water years that we've had in the last decade. There's more water than they know what to do with. In this kind of a year, they're deciding that they're going to close down 500,000 acres because of because of the new formula that have been introduced on the prerogative, I guess, of the Department of of Water Resources. None of it makes any sense. So they would say they're following through with this agreement that they had put in place a few years ago, and the farmers should have known. I've talked to the governor, and the governor's position is he can't do anything about this because it's mentioned in the constitution and the supreme court has weighed in, but honestly, when I talk to the attorneys they're saying that's that's not a truthful version of what the facts are. The governor's office has a whole lot of prerogative, the Department of Water Resources has the prerogative on how to interpret these laws. By the way, the law does give priority to the folks that have senior water rights, so that's parcelled true. But the governor, I'm gonna plead that the governor exercised leadership here and that the legislature exercise some leadership and put, build some framework. What we need to have them do is build some framework around these agreements and around the laws so that, um, we don't lose all of our agriculture in this area and that appears to be the plan.”

Wall Street Apes

685,251 次观看 • 2 年前

This narrative has been going since the year 2000 when China entered the WTO. The problem is they don't play by the rules. These companies who are doing business there are finding all kinds of problems, although they really want access to that massive market. There's no question about that. It's just their IP gets stolen all the time. They can't litigate when they have a dispute. There's no way to resolve it. The Chinese use the American courts to litigate their interests here and in the US, and many other things they do here. So a lot of this discussion is to try and balance the playing field, and one would hope that could happen, but it never has. That's why Trump is using tariffs to trying to squeeze them into submission. We'll see what the next round looks like.
3:14

This narrative has been going since the year 2000 when China entered the WTO. The problem is they don't play by the rules. These companies who are doing business there are finding all kinds of problems, although they really want access to that massive market. There's no question about that. It's just their IP gets stolen all the time. They can't litigate when they have a dispute. There's no way to resolve it. The Chinese use the American courts to litigate their interests here and in the US, and many other things they do here. So a lot of this discussion is to try and balance the playing field, and one would hope that could happen, but it never has. That's why Trump is using tariffs to trying to squeeze them into submission. We'll see what the next round looks like.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

27,584 次观看 • 2 个月前

President Kagame on sports shaping countries’ economies in the future: It's not just the future. When you talk about, for example, the arena, the stadium, it's already happening. People are taking notice of that and counting and knowing that it has employed so many, it has brought in so much. And that interaction around people here and beyond, with the rest of the world, speaks volumes in terms of value. So it has already brought in a lot. And it's a question of growing that. And we also know that statistics show that even across Africa, in terms of sports, it's running into billions as to what sports can bring to the continent, tens of billions. I think what we do as leaders at different levels is to encourage people to be part of realizing that story and reaping the benefits. And it's happening. So it's no longer something you just listen to and think it is for others and not for you. Now people believe, they start by believing. And when they start by believing and see things happening, then they believe even more and get more involved. And, I mean, the sky is the limit.
2:17

President Kagame on sports shaping countries’ economies in the future: It's not just the future. When you talk about, for example, the arena, the stadium, it's already happening. People are taking notice of that and counting and knowing that it has employed so many, it has brought in so much. And that interaction around people here and beyond, with the rest of the world, speaks volumes in terms of value. So it has already brought in a lot. And it's a question of growing that. And we also know that statistics show that even across Africa, in terms of sports, it's running into billions as to what sports can bring to the continent, tens of billions. I think what we do as leaders at different levels is to encourage people to be part of realizing that story and reaping the benefits. And it's happening. So it's no longer something you just listen to and think it is for others and not for you. Now people believe, they start by believing. And when they start by believing and see things happening, then they believe even more and get more involved. And, I mean, the sky is the limit.

Presidency | Rwanda

68,776 次观看 • 11 个月前

It’s time to End The Federal Reserve “What is the Federal Reserve and what is your answer?” G. Edward Griffin “Well, what it is, it's a cartel. It's not a government agency. It has the appearance of being a government agency and they went to great lengths to give it that facade. It does have the power of government because Congress voted to give the power of enforcement to it. But in its essence, underneath it, it's a cartel. It's nothing different than a banana cartel or an oil cartel, sugar cartel. It happens to be a banking cartel. They got together, they drew up the rules and regulations for their own industry to self regulate their own industry is what cartels do. And then they sent it to Congress and they took off the label at the top that said banking cartel and they erased that and they said Federal Reserve Act, Congress passed it into law. And that's why we think it's a government agency, is because if you don't obey the rules that they set down for their own industry, you go to prison. And so it looks like a government agency, but basically the answer to your question is, it's a banking cartel.”
1:08

It’s time to End The Federal Reserve “What is the Federal Reserve and what is your answer?” G. Edward Griffin “Well, what it is, it's a cartel. It's not a government agency. It has the appearance of being a government agency and they went to great lengths to give it that facade. It does have the power of government because Congress voted to give the power of enforcement to it. But in its essence, underneath it, it's a cartel. It's nothing different than a banana cartel or an oil cartel, sugar cartel. It happens to be a banking cartel. They got together, they drew up the rules and regulations for their own industry to self regulate their own industry is what cartels do. And then they sent it to Congress and they took off the label at the top that said banking cartel and they erased that and they said Federal Reserve Act, Congress passed it into law. And that's why we think it's a government agency, is because if you don't obey the rules that they set down for their own industry, you go to prison. And so it looks like a government agency, but basically the answer to your question is, it's a banking cartel.”

Wall Street Apes

211,137 次观看 • 1 年前

.David Deutsch: The equivalent of consilience, that is, the unified meta-theory, as you put it, for all sciences, and I think actually more than a meta-theory, because I think more links them than just the structure and methodology and so on, was discovered by Popper. Again, I don't know whether this is historically the order in which things happen, but he is famous for his political philosophy and for his philosophy of science, and he found at one point that they are the same, that they both are about problems and about the fact that there is no such instruction from without, there is only conjecture from within. So that's why Lamarckism is false and Darwinism is true, and that's why group selection is false and individual selection is true, and so on. So I think it's already there in Popper. I think there's a lot more to it, and I tried to add another couple of things to it, so quantum theory and computation, but there's a lot that isn't in it, like consciousness and creativity and so on, that we have no idea of how those work and how they fit in with those other things. Gad Saad: Forgive me for interrupting you, David, I'm sorry. There is a book by Dean Simington, who's a psychologist out of, I think, UC Davis, that actually offers a Darwinian account for creativity. It's actually quite mind-blowing. So keep that in mind. I can give you the reference later, but go ahead. David Deutsch: I don't read such things unless they've already made an AGI. Gad Saad: I see. Okay, fair enough. David Deutsch: If they can't make an AGI, then they haven't got the full theory. They might have an idea for a theory, but then Popper has an idea for a theory, but he couldn't make one either. And Turing thought that there'd be an AGI by the year 2000, and that it would require two megabytes of memory. Now, he's obviously wrong about the year 2000, but two megabytes of memory, I reckon that's what it'll be. In other words, these large language models and all this massive computer power is going in entirely the wrong direction. The answer will be a philosophical breakthrough, which will allow, once we understand what we're trying to make, it will be relatively easy to make it with relatively few computational resources.
2:58

.David Deutsch: The equivalent of consilience, that is, the unified meta-theory, as you put it, for all sciences, and I think actually more than a meta-theory, because I think more links them than just the structure and methodology and so on, was discovered by Popper. Again, I don't know whether this is historically the order in which things happen, but he is famous for his political philosophy and for his philosophy of science, and he found at one point that they are the same, that they both are about problems and about the fact that there is no such instruction from without, there is only conjecture from within. So that's why Lamarckism is false and Darwinism is true, and that's why group selection is false and individual selection is true, and so on. So I think it's already there in Popper. I think there's a lot more to it, and I tried to add another couple of things to it, so quantum theory and computation, but there's a lot that isn't in it, like consciousness and creativity and so on, that we have no idea of how those work and how they fit in with those other things. Gad Saad: Forgive me for interrupting you, David, I'm sorry. There is a book by Dean Simington, who's a psychologist out of, I think, UC Davis, that actually offers a Darwinian account for creativity. It's actually quite mind-blowing. So keep that in mind. I can give you the reference later, but go ahead. David Deutsch: I don't read such things unless they've already made an AGI. Gad Saad: I see. Okay, fair enough. David Deutsch: If they can't make an AGI, then they haven't got the full theory. They might have an idea for a theory, but then Popper has an idea for a theory, but he couldn't make one either. And Turing thought that there'd be an AGI by the year 2000, and that it would require two megabytes of memory. Now, he's obviously wrong about the year 2000, but two megabytes of memory, I reckon that's what it'll be. In other words, these large language models and all this massive computer power is going in entirely the wrong direction. The answer will be a philosophical breakthrough, which will allow, once we understand what we're trying to make, it will be relatively easy to make it with relatively few computational resources.

Deutsch Explains

33,398 次观看 • 1 年前

Demis Hassabis: AGI will be an intertwined model of Gemini, Genie and something like Nano Banana. Nano Banana shows first climps of AGI "It also has Gemini under the hood, it sort of understands what's going on semantically in those images, so I think that's sort of, it's getting towards a kind of AGIfor imaging" AGI will be the unification of the Genie 3, Nano Banana and Gemini models "And then eventually, we got to kind of converge all of those different projects. And they're intertwined. But we need to, you know, converge them all into one" Google seems to be doing everything right at the moment. With Genie 3, Gemini 3, and Nano Banana, they have all the prerequisites to create a general model that develops a true understanding of the real world.
1:45

Demis Hassabis: AGI will be an intertwined model of Gemini, Genie and something like Nano Banana. Nano Banana shows first climps of AGI "It also has Gemini under the hood, it sort of understands what's going on semantically in those images, so I think that's sort of, it's getting towards a kind of AGIfor imaging" AGI will be the unification of the Genie 3, Nano Banana and Gemini models "And then eventually, we got to kind of converge all of those different projects. And they're intertwined. But we need to, you know, converge them all into one" Google seems to be doing everything right at the moment. With Genie 3, Gemini 3, and Nano Banana, they have all the prerequisites to create a general model that develops a true understanding of the real world.

Chubby♨️

66,335 次观看 • 7 个月前

.David Deutsch on why the people in favor of regulating AI are wrong: “They look at problems and they think they’re insoluble because they haven’t been solved, and therefore they want to prevent the progress that is going to cause the problems. Now, generically, what that will do is it will make the progress happen in the wrong place. It will happen among people who do not obey the regulation, and those people are people who are alienated from the best culture, and they will then become a danger to the best culture. Now, I’m speaking in general terms about progress—progress in computing and so on—but I think this particular thing you’ve mentioned is actually not going to be that much of a danger. AGI (artificial general intelligence) will present a whole load of new problems which will have to be solved, no doubt with the help of AGI. But AI, the kind of thing we have now with ChatGPT and that kind of thing, which is amazingly and increasingly useful and is going to have unpredictable effects on society—most of them good—isn’t anything profound. It’s no different from having a calculator or a slide rule.”
1:41

.David Deutsch on why the people in favor of regulating AI are wrong: “They look at problems and they think they’re insoluble because they haven’t been solved, and therefore they want to prevent the progress that is going to cause the problems. Now, generically, what that will do is it will make the progress happen in the wrong place. It will happen among people who do not obey the regulation, and those people are people who are alienated from the best culture, and they will then become a danger to the best culture. Now, I’m speaking in general terms about progress—progress in computing and so on—but I think this particular thing you’ve mentioned is actually not going to be that much of a danger. AGI (artificial general intelligence) will present a whole load of new problems which will have to be solved, no doubt with the help of AGI. But AI, the kind of thing we have now with ChatGPT and that kind of thing, which is amazingly and increasingly useful and is going to have unpredictable effects on society—most of them good—isn’t anything profound. It’s no different from having a calculator or a slide rule.”

Arjun Khemani

30,132 次观看 • 1 年前

Pharma insider describes the putrid/horrifying way the Covid-jab "mRNA" is made: "[It's] a synthetic chemical molecule...and they throw it into a vat of E. Coli. [which] is literally shit...[and the mRNA has] antibiotic resistant genes...It has nothing to do with human [mRNA]." This clip of retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art") is taken from an interview with Anita Krishna (Anita K) posted to Rumble on July 9, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So especially people need to understand, when we say, in relation to, to these things, when we say DNA and RNA, it has nothing to do with what is, what is claimed to be human DNA and RNA. Nothing. Think of it as like your car has rubber tires today, right? Those rubber tires don't come from the rubber tree. At some point in the past, they came from the rubber tree. That was the only source of rubber was rubber tree. And today they're all synthetic. Rubber has nothing to do with the tree, but we still call them rubber. So that's the DNA and RNA that, that's in [the Covid injections]. It's the synthetic, synthetic molecules, chemicals that these, you know, scientists I make fun of, call DNA and RNA. It has nothing to do with humans. "It's synthetically made. So it's a synthetic chemical molecule, which they, throw into. So the, they make this DNA synthetic chemical molecule using synthetic chemistry methods, and they throw it into a vat of E. Coli. E. coli is literally shit. Those are the bacteria that make feces. And so there's a big vat of this beautiful, beautiful bacteria called E. Coli. They throw these pieces of synthetic material. Those, creatures, uptake it, they eat it, and then they replicate that. They replicate very quickly. So in 24 hours, I think it doubles or something. Anyway, so, so they, so they eat these pieces of chemicals, they replicate themselves rapidly, and that's how they grow DNA in the lab. "And, once they've grown enough of it, so, so the, so the synthetic. Yeah, they grow that, that's what gets distributed and to the labs that make the vaccines. Yeah, yeah, it's the first step. So, so the, the, the, the DNA, like the DNA molecule that they throw into E. coli vat is kind of like a negative for the photo, from which then you make a print, which is the RNA. Right. And, and so, so they grow this DNA volume in this E. coli vat. Then they throw— also in that DNA molecule that they design. They. The reason it's not human because it has a whole bunch of features also. Well, it's made synthetically, but it also, in addition to pretending like it has something to do with humans, which it doesn't, they also input into that molecule, what's called, antibiotic resistant genes. "So there's a, there's a sequence there that is, designed to be resistant to antibiotics, in particular kanamycin and some other mycin and neomycin and kanamycin. And then, and then because once they've grown enough in E. Coli, they need to kill the E. Coli. And how do they kill E. Coli? With antibiotics. So they throw a whole bunch of antibiotics into this vat to kill the E. Coli. The process, not a single step of this manufacturing as I'm describing, is completely clean. So all the in-process materials and everything that was done in the previous steps always ends up in the next step. "Even though they're saying they're cleaning, they're removing the blah, blah. But it's never perfect, never complete. So we have now go into the next step. We have some E. Coli cells that haven't killed, they haven't been killed. We have antibiotic resistant genes. We have some antibiotic that's still left over. We have, endotoxins, which is E. Coli's own excrement, extremely toxic to humans. And we have all kinds of other ethanol and other process, in process chemicals that were there. Then it goes to the next step. And the next step they convert, using different enzymes and other chemicals, they convert this DNA molecule into the RNA molecule. The RNA molecule also is not human. It's made synthetically, but also has features that are completely foreign to humans, such as substitution of uridine with pseudo uridine, for which Kariko and Weissman got Nobel Prize. And Robert Malone was very upset because he didn't get the Nobel Prize. He wrote a whole long whining stack about it. "So then, then they, so that they make this RNA, then it immediately starts breaking. So because it's very fragile and it's a very long large molecule, the large molecules are unstable. They always break apart. And this one starts breaking almost immediately. Then we have some, some larger pieces of RNA, then we have some smaller pieces of RNA. God knows what they do. And then they, then they, that's called active ingredient, your RNA. And then they throw it into the cationic lipids, and a whole bunch of other chemicals, to create the lipid nanoparticle that's supposed to contain all this. "Now again, the lipid nanoparticle is not perfect. They break. There are pieces, they're pieces floating around. They agglomerate. So it's a total mess. It's a total mess. And it has nothing to do with humans. Again, nothing to do with DNA, nothing to do with RNA or humankind. Even if it did, even some miraculous reason, they've created something that's perfect copy of a human. A human DNA or human RNA. Well, guess what? You still can't, can't have that in your body because it's not your DNA and it's not your RNA. It's foreign to you and it's going to cause the same damage. But this one is now, you know, we just have chemicals on top of chemicals on top of chemicals. And as I said, the lipids, lipids are cationic and so they'll wreck your blood flow."
6:22

Pharma insider describes the putrid/horrifying way the Covid-jab "mRNA" is made: "[It's] a synthetic chemical molecule...and they throw it into a vat of E. Coli. [which] is literally shit...[and the mRNA has] antibiotic resistant genes...It has nothing to do with human [mRNA]." This clip of retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art") is taken from an interview with Anita Krishna (Anita K) posted to Rumble on July 9, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So especially people need to understand, when we say, in relation to, to these things, when we say DNA and RNA, it has nothing to do with what is, what is claimed to be human DNA and RNA. Nothing. Think of it as like your car has rubber tires today, right? Those rubber tires don't come from the rubber tree. At some point in the past, they came from the rubber tree. That was the only source of rubber was rubber tree. And today they're all synthetic. Rubber has nothing to do with the tree, but we still call them rubber. So that's the DNA and RNA that, that's in [the Covid injections]. It's the synthetic, synthetic molecules, chemicals that these, you know, scientists I make fun of, call DNA and RNA. It has nothing to do with humans. "It's synthetically made. So it's a synthetic chemical molecule, which they, throw into. So the, they make this DNA synthetic chemical molecule using synthetic chemistry methods, and they throw it into a vat of E. Coli. E. coli is literally shit. Those are the bacteria that make feces. And so there's a big vat of this beautiful, beautiful bacteria called E. Coli. They throw these pieces of synthetic material. Those, creatures, uptake it, they eat it, and then they replicate that. They replicate very quickly. So in 24 hours, I think it doubles or something. Anyway, so, so they, so they eat these pieces of chemicals, they replicate themselves rapidly, and that's how they grow DNA in the lab. "And, once they've grown enough of it, so, so the, so the synthetic. Yeah, they grow that, that's what gets distributed and to the labs that make the vaccines. Yeah, yeah, it's the first step. So, so the, the, the, the DNA, like the DNA molecule that they throw into E. coli vat is kind of like a negative for the photo, from which then you make a print, which is the RNA. Right. And, and so, so they grow this DNA volume in this E. coli vat. Then they throw— also in that DNA molecule that they design. They. The reason it's not human because it has a whole bunch of features also. Well, it's made synthetically, but it also, in addition to pretending like it has something to do with humans, which it doesn't, they also input into that molecule, what's called, antibiotic resistant genes. "So there's a, there's a sequence there that is, designed to be resistant to antibiotics, in particular kanamycin and some other mycin and neomycin and kanamycin. And then, and then because once they've grown enough in E. Coli, they need to kill the E. Coli. And how do they kill E. Coli? With antibiotics. So they throw a whole bunch of antibiotics into this vat to kill the E. Coli. The process, not a single step of this manufacturing as I'm describing, is completely clean. So all the in-process materials and everything that was done in the previous steps always ends up in the next step. "Even though they're saying they're cleaning, they're removing the blah, blah. But it's never perfect, never complete. So we have now go into the next step. We have some E. Coli cells that haven't killed, they haven't been killed. We have antibiotic resistant genes. We have some antibiotic that's still left over. We have, endotoxins, which is E. Coli's own excrement, extremely toxic to humans. And we have all kinds of other ethanol and other process, in process chemicals that were there. Then it goes to the next step. And the next step they convert, using different enzymes and other chemicals, they convert this DNA molecule into the RNA molecule. The RNA molecule also is not human. It's made synthetically, but also has features that are completely foreign to humans, such as substitution of uridine with pseudo uridine, for which Kariko and Weissman got Nobel Prize. And Robert Malone was very upset because he didn't get the Nobel Prize. He wrote a whole long whining stack about it. "So then, then they, so that they make this RNA, then it immediately starts breaking. So because it's very fragile and it's a very long large molecule, the large molecules are unstable. They always break apart. And this one starts breaking almost immediately. Then we have some, some larger pieces of RNA, then we have some smaller pieces of RNA. God knows what they do. And then they, then they, that's called active ingredient, your RNA. And then they throw it into the cationic lipids, and a whole bunch of other chemicals, to create the lipid nanoparticle that's supposed to contain all this. "Now again, the lipid nanoparticle is not perfect. They break. There are pieces, they're pieces floating around. They agglomerate. So it's a total mess. It's a total mess. And it has nothing to do with humans. Again, nothing to do with DNA, nothing to do with RNA or humankind. Even if it did, even some miraculous reason, they've created something that's perfect copy of a human. A human DNA or human RNA. Well, guess what? You still can't, can't have that in your body because it's not your DNA and it's not your RNA. It's foreign to you and it's going to cause the same damage. But this one is now, you know, we just have chemicals on top of chemicals on top of chemicals. And as I said, the lipids, lipids are cationic and so they'll wreck your blood flow."

Sense Receptor

58,002 次观看 • 1 年前