Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨Are We Living Inside a Planetary Surveillance Shell? Dr. Eamonn Ansbro tracked 660 unidentified orbital tracks moving in sync with Earth’s rotation, but they’re not satellites. They drift like an autonomous surveillance network. Separately, Dr. Beatriz Villarroel found aligned transient light events on Palomar plates decades before Sputnik. These...

UAPWatchers's profile picture

Skywatch Signal

98,755 subscribers

37,625 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & TechnologyNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

A top astronomer just revealed shocking evidence that over 100,000 UFOs orbited Earth in the 1950s. “Almost 15,000 per year.” Using digitized plates from telescopes at the Palomar Observatory, Dr. Beatriz Villarroel identified 100,000+ “transients,” or objects that reflected light like a mirror, that vanished in minutes. Her findings suggest that a high percentage of those were real UFOs—and they had a statistically significant correlation to nuclear tests and documented UFO sightings from the 50s. Jesse Michels: “You’ve basically found, pre-satellites in space, objects surrounding the Earth.” “How many of these ‘transients’ did you find?” Beatriz Villarroel: “Our original sample is around 105,000 transients from just the northern hemisphere.” “But we assume that it’s only one-third of these that are relevant.” “I don’t know how many of these transients might be associated with only one object, or if it’s like one object could give several of them.” Michels: “And you found this over what period of time?” Villarroel: “It’s over six years, it’s 780 hours of exposure time.” Jesse Michels Beatriz Villarroel
1:48

A top astronomer just revealed shocking evidence that over 100,000 UFOs orbited Earth in the 1950s. “Almost 15,000 per year.” Using digitized plates from telescopes at the Palomar Observatory, Dr. Beatriz Villarroel identified 100,000+ “transients,” or objects that reflected light like a mirror, that vanished in minutes. Her findings suggest that a high percentage of those were real UFOs—and they had a statistically significant correlation to nuclear tests and documented UFO sightings from the 50s. Jesse Michels: “You’ve basically found, pre-satellites in space, objects surrounding the Earth.” “How many of these ‘transients’ did you find?” Beatriz Villarroel: “Our original sample is around 105,000 transients from just the northern hemisphere.” “But we assume that it’s only one-third of these that are relevant.” “I don’t know how many of these transients might be associated with only one object, or if it’s like one object could give several of them.” Michels: “And you found this over what period of time?” Villarroel: “It’s over six years, it’s 780 hours of exposure time.” Jesse Michels Beatriz Villarroel

Holden Culotta

24,569 views • 10 months ago

Dr. Beatriz Villarroel may have found evidence of a fleet of UFO's orbiting earth in the 1950's 👽🛸 "We found one image where nine stars were out there, and they vanished. And they are not there half an hour earlier, and they are not there six days later." On April 12, 1950, seven years before Sputnik, nine point like sources appeared simultaneously on a single Palomar Observatory photographic plate. They flashed like stars during the long exposure but were absent on plates taken 30 minutes earlier and six days later. Nothing human was in orbit. Dr Villarroel told Dr Brian Keating these objects showed star like brightness profiles with no streaks, ruling out fast moving asteroids or meteors. Natural astrophysical explanations and plate defects were carefully examined and did not fit. The closest modern analogy is brief solar reflections from flat, highly reflective artificial objects in high orbit. This discovery comes from the VASCO project, which searches historical sky surveys for vanishing and appearing sources. As Villarroel has noted, such flashes align with what we see today from satellites and space debris, yet these predate all known human activity in space.
2:59

Dr. Beatriz Villarroel may have found evidence of a fleet of UFO's orbiting earth in the 1950's 👽🛸 "We found one image where nine stars were out there, and they vanished. And they are not there half an hour earlier, and they are not there six days later." On April 12, 1950, seven years before Sputnik, nine point like sources appeared simultaneously on a single Palomar Observatory photographic plate. They flashed like stars during the long exposure but were absent on plates taken 30 minutes earlier and six days later. Nothing human was in orbit. Dr Villarroel told Dr Brian Keating these objects showed star like brightness profiles with no streaks, ruling out fast moving asteroids or meteors. Natural astrophysical explanations and plate defects were carefully examined and did not fit. The closest modern analogy is brief solar reflections from flat, highly reflective artificial objects in high orbit. This discovery comes from the VASCO project, which searches historical sky surveys for vanishing and appearing sources. As Villarroel has noted, such flashes align with what we see today from satellites and space debris, yet these predate all known human activity in space.

Interstellar

26,348 views • 1 month ago

"There might be some other (natural) explanation. But...I cannot find any other consistent explanation [other] than that we are looking at something artificial before Sputnik 1." ~BV (At the very least, these papers being published SHOULD get the convo about the phenomenon heated up again in the media. In short: On photographic plates taken of the sky before the first human satellite (Sputnik 1) was put into orbit, there appear to be star-like objects that have been labelled "transients.") From the paper in Nature: Scientific Reports "These short-lived transients (lasting less than one exposure time of 50 min)...are absent in images taken shortly before the transients appear and in all images from subsequent surveys." ~~~ (It appears these objects (if that's what they are) are very flat and reflective and not defects on the photographic plate, or self-luminous, as they disappear at statistically-significant rates when in the Umbra (complete shadow) of the Earth. If they WERE photographic defects or self-luminous objects, being in shadow shouldn't affect the amount detected.) Also: "Findings suggest associations beyond chance between occurrence of transients and both nuclear testing and UAP reports." (On, with Ross Coulthart (RC), Beatriz Villarroel (BV) went through the possibilities of what these transients might be: BV: "So there are different plausible explanations. One is maybe that there is something we don't know about the human civilization. And maybe we had a few rounds, already (laughs). It's one possibility." RC: "So maybe there's a prior human civilization that was wiped out as people like Graham Hancock talk about." BV: "That's one possibility." RC: "You know, the Younger Dryas, twelve and a half thousand years ago. Maybe there was a prior human civilization, and a lot of these megalithic monuments we see on the planet are, in fact, remnants of a previous, possibly human civilization. That's a good one. An alternative explanation." BV: "Maybe it's non-human probes that were sent here? Like Patrick Jackson, he has this beautiful suggestion of a surveillance network. And I think that kind of...it looks very logical. If you have another civilization that is capable of constructing these probes, why wouldn't they send here lots of them? So, that's a possibility. "Nature can always surprise us with something we could never have imagined, so I cannot exclude that there might be some other explanation that is just outside my imagination. But for what I see, I cannot find any other consistent explanation than that we are looking at something artificial before Sputnik 1."
1:22

"There might be some other (natural) explanation. But...I cannot find any other consistent explanation [other] than that we are looking at something artificial before Sputnik 1." ~BV (At the very least, these papers being published SHOULD get the convo about the phenomenon heated up again in the media. In short: On photographic plates taken of the sky before the first human satellite (Sputnik 1) was put into orbit, there appear to be star-like objects that have been labelled "transients.") From the paper in Nature: Scientific Reports "These short-lived transients (lasting less than one exposure time of 50 min)...are absent in images taken shortly before the transients appear and in all images from subsequent surveys." ~~~ (It appears these objects (if that's what they are) are very flat and reflective and not defects on the photographic plate, or self-luminous, as they disappear at statistically-significant rates when in the Umbra (complete shadow) of the Earth. If they WERE photographic defects or self-luminous objects, being in shadow shouldn't affect the amount detected.) Also: "Findings suggest associations beyond chance between occurrence of transients and both nuclear testing and UAP reports." (On, with Ross Coulthart (RC), Beatriz Villarroel (BV) went through the possibilities of what these transients might be: BV: "So there are different plausible explanations. One is maybe that there is something we don't know about the human civilization. And maybe we had a few rounds, already (laughs). It's one possibility." RC: "So maybe there's a prior human civilization that was wiped out as people like Graham Hancock talk about." BV: "That's one possibility." RC: "You know, the Younger Dryas, twelve and a half thousand years ago. Maybe there was a prior human civilization, and a lot of these megalithic monuments we see on the planet are, in fact, remnants of a previous, possibly human civilization. That's a good one. An alternative explanation." BV: "Maybe it's non-human probes that were sent here? Like Patrick Jackson, he has this beautiful suggestion of a surveillance network. And I think that kind of...it looks very logical. If you have another civilization that is capable of constructing these probes, why wouldn't they send here lots of them? So, that's a possibility. "Nature can always surprise us with something we could never have imagined, so I cannot exclude that there might be some other explanation that is just outside my imagination. But for what I see, I cannot find any other consistent explanation than that we are looking at something artificial before Sputnik 1."

Joe Murgia

24,975 views • 10 months ago

RFK Jr: “EVERYTHING is gonna change” with CDC vaccine policy 🔥 This is exactly what I voted for. “None of the vaccines that are given during the first 6 months of life have ever been tested for autism—the only one was the DTP vaccine.” “And that one study that was done, according to the National Academy of Sciences, found that there was a link.” “They threw out that study because it was based upon CDC’s surveillance system, VAERS, and they said that system is no good.” “That begs the question, why doesn’t CDC have a functional surveillance system?” “We’re gonna make sure they do have a functional surveillance system.” “They don’t do pre-licensing safety testing for vaccine. They’re the only product that’s exempt. So what they say is, if there are injuries, we’ll capture them afterward.” “But they have a system that doesn’t capture them.” “In fact, CDC’s own study of its own system said it captures fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries.” “Why have we gone for 39 years and nobody’s fixed it?” “We’re gonna fix it.” “We’re gonna have gold standard science … we’re gonna publish all of our datasets, which CDC has never done.” “We’re gonna do replication of all our studies, which CDC has never done.” “We’re gonna publish our peer review, which CDC has never done.” Secretary Kennedy
2:27

RFK Jr: “EVERYTHING is gonna change” with CDC vaccine policy 🔥 This is exactly what I voted for. “None of the vaccines that are given during the first 6 months of life have ever been tested for autism—the only one was the DTP vaccine.” “And that one study that was done, according to the National Academy of Sciences, found that there was a link.” “They threw out that study because it was based upon CDC’s surveillance system, VAERS, and they said that system is no good.” “That begs the question, why doesn’t CDC have a functional surveillance system?” “We’re gonna make sure they do have a functional surveillance system.” “They don’t do pre-licensing safety testing for vaccine. They’re the only product that’s exempt. So what they say is, if there are injuries, we’ll capture them afterward.” “But they have a system that doesn’t capture them.” “In fact, CDC’s own study of its own system said it captures fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries.” “Why have we gone for 39 years and nobody’s fixed it?” “We’re gonna fix it.” “We’re gonna have gold standard science … we’re gonna publish all of our datasets, which CDC has never done.” “We’re gonna do replication of all our studies, which CDC has never done.” “We’re gonna publish our peer review, which CDC has never done.” Secretary Kennedy

Holden Culotta

955,960 views • 1 year ago

This person showed what the inside of an inflatable mascot looks like, so I went through several clips and put together a quick summary. There are confidentiality agreements. Some mascots are contract-bound, so their identities can’t be revealed. So please do not try to track them down or dig into who they are, because it could cause problems. If they are indoors in air conditioning, it is not too bad. But at outdoor events, the fan pulls hot air inside, which makes the inside of the mascot extremely hot. The stronger the sun is outside, the worse it gets. As for visibility, they can see from the inside, but the field of vision may not be very wide. The fan is also very loud, so loud that even in the clip, it was hard to hear properly. So when talking to San, please be patient and speak one at a time. Otherwise San probably can’t hear properly. And please don’t be upset if San doesn’t respond sometimes, he genuinely might not hear you. As for footwear, some wear shoes, some just wear socks. It depends. Please be kind to San and all the other mascots.
1:24

This person showed what the inside of an inflatable mascot looks like, so I went through several clips and put together a quick summary. There are confidentiality agreements. Some mascots are contract-bound, so their identities can’t be revealed. So please do not try to track them down or dig into who they are, because it could cause problems. If they are indoors in air conditioning, it is not too bad. But at outdoor events, the fan pulls hot air inside, which makes the inside of the mascot extremely hot. The stronger the sun is outside, the worse it gets. As for visibility, they can see from the inside, but the field of vision may not be very wide. The fan is also very loud, so loud that even in the clip, it was hard to hear properly. So when talking to San, please be patient and speak one at a time. Otherwise San probably can’t hear properly. And please don’t be upset if San doesn’t respond sometimes, he genuinely might not hear you. As for footwear, some wear shoes, some just wear socks. It depends. Please be kind to San and all the other mascots.

WittySmirK

32,601 views • 4 months ago

Premier of Manitoba in Canada Wab Kinew says the quiet part out loud He’s rejecting data center projects because the real reason behind them is “surveillance capitalism” “We're not gonna move ahead with the data centre — I reject the idea that we have to be slaves to surveillance capitalism in order to participate in the modern economy” “So the message to any company out there should be, if you wanna have a thoughtful, human-centered approach to technology, come to Manitoba 'cause that's what we're interested in” This really should make you wonder about all the thousands of data centers being rapidly put up in America. You don’t need that many data centers for AI… The surveillance state is being built, right now I show in the video there are already hundreds of hyper scale data centers in America where they are either dedicated to, or a portion of them is dedicated to, surveillance of American for things like purchases It’s already happening
1:36

Premier of Manitoba in Canada Wab Kinew says the quiet part out loud He’s rejecting data center projects because the real reason behind them is “surveillance capitalism” “We're not gonna move ahead with the data centre — I reject the idea that we have to be slaves to surveillance capitalism in order to participate in the modern economy” “So the message to any company out there should be, if you wanna have a thoughtful, human-centered approach to technology, come to Manitoba 'cause that's what we're interested in” This really should make you wonder about all the thousands of data centers being rapidly put up in America. You don’t need that many data centers for AI… The surveillance state is being built, right now I show in the video there are already hundreds of hyper scale data centers in America where they are either dedicated to, or a portion of them is dedicated to, surveillance of American for things like purchases It’s already happening

Wall Street Apes

31,385 views • 1 month ago

🚨The Evidence Might Already Exist We Just Never Looked Beatriz Villarroel isn't scanning the sky for UFOs in real time. She's digging through astronomical photographs taken before satellites even existed. Working with glass plates from the 1950s, Villarroel found star like objects that appear and vanish within an hour. Not one or two, in one case, nine. In another, five flashes aligned along a perfect line, with odds of random alignment at roughly 1 in 10,000. Stars just don't do that. Supernovae don't even do that. Plate defects don't even explain it away. The other thing we need to remember is that this was before Sputnik. Whatever caused it, it definitely wasn't us. As always she's cautious and methodical. She doesn't claim proof of ET probes. But her work exposes a very real possibility, that the search for non human technology may not be about new telescopes at all… it may be about reexamining old data we ignored. I am posting about this again because Beatriz made it into the National Geographic. Kudos to Beatriz and her team. #UAP #UFO #BeatrizVillarroel #Astronomy #Disclosure #SETI #Skywatch #Anomalies
4:44

🚨The Evidence Might Already Exist We Just Never Looked Beatriz Villarroel isn't scanning the sky for UFOs in real time. She's digging through astronomical photographs taken before satellites even existed. Working with glass plates from the 1950s, Villarroel found star like objects that appear and vanish within an hour. Not one or two, in one case, nine. In another, five flashes aligned along a perfect line, with odds of random alignment at roughly 1 in 10,000. Stars just don't do that. Supernovae don't even do that. Plate defects don't even explain it away. The other thing we need to remember is that this was before Sputnik. Whatever caused it, it definitely wasn't us. As always she's cautious and methodical. She doesn't claim proof of ET probes. But her work exposes a very real possibility, that the search for non human technology may not be about new telescopes at all… it may be about reexamining old data we ignored. I am posting about this again because Beatriz made it into the National Geographic. Kudos to Beatriz and her team. #UAP #UFO #BeatrizVillarroel #Astronomy #Disclosure #SETI #Skywatch #Anomalies

Skywatch Signal

139,965 views • 7 months ago

Rockstar Tom DeLonge: "There is time dilation caused by the gravity bubble with UFO's" 👽🛸 On Joe Rogan the Blink 182 frontman described how claimed advanced craft create an artificial gravity bubble that produces a real time difference between the inside of the machine and the outside world. "They also time travel which is different than what people think in like a movie. When you use the technology you have a time difference between what they are doing inside of an artificially created bubble of gravity of sorts and then what is on the outside." "If you are on the inside of one of those machines everything would be skewed more black and white. There would be like a redshift and everybody would look frozen so you literally could fly around and grab a coke out of someone's hand and put it in someone else's hand." DeLonge said the description came from physicists he consulted, including Dr. Hal Puthoff, a Nobel nominee and expert in plasma physics and exotic advanced propulsion. The account applies known effects such as gravitational time dilation and redshift to the performance of these craft.
1:26

Rockstar Tom DeLonge: "There is time dilation caused by the gravity bubble with UFO's" 👽🛸 On Joe Rogan the Blink 182 frontman described how claimed advanced craft create an artificial gravity bubble that produces a real time difference between the inside of the machine and the outside world. "They also time travel which is different than what people think in like a movie. When you use the technology you have a time difference between what they are doing inside of an artificially created bubble of gravity of sorts and then what is on the outside." "If you are on the inside of one of those machines everything would be skewed more black and white. There would be like a redshift and everybody would look frozen so you literally could fly around and grab a coke out of someone's hand and put it in someone else's hand." DeLonge said the description came from physicists he consulted, including Dr. Hal Puthoff, a Nobel nominee and expert in plasma physics and exotic advanced propulsion. The account applies known effects such as gravitational time dilation and redshift to the performance of these craft.

Interstellar

17,403 views • 6 days ago

Anthony Albanese has just appointed the wrong person to head up the Fuel Taskforce. Albanese is a lifelong waste of taxpayers’ money. But much worse than that, he has been out of his depth for his entire career. He now presents an imminent danger to our nation’s prosperity, national security and strategic preparedness. Many people will suffer for his efforts as push-comes-to-shove in our latest fuel crisis. As they say in the playground “it takes one to know one”, and not to be outdone, Albanese has gone and put a lifelong climate zealot and total waste of taxpayer money, Anthea Harris, in charge of his government’s response to the fuel crisis. The clip below, is Anthea giving an address to the ANU in her capacity as the head of the Climate Change Authority back in 2015. She either believes that all of these non-solutions to the non-climate problem are really necessary - which would make her rather daft - or she knows it is all a complete scam, and she is just a scammer… A professional scammer, living on the taxpayer, and living well at that. More, the net result of her work so far has been to help destroy our energy grid and just about everything else relating to our ability to make and do things in Australia. Because cheap and reliable energy is central to everything. Everything. Whether it is coal, gas or liquid fuels, Australia needs these things to provide a first world living standard for the people. She has been an instrumental part of the war on our living standards thus far. All the while they threw our prosperity in the air, put on a blindfold and hoped to catch it in a windmill shaped glove. Now she is in charge of Albanese’s response to our critical, non-critical supply of petrochemicals that are at crisis levels, but we are not in a crisis. If you believe any of what they say… She is not an expert in logistics, or oil supply, petrochemicals or any other area that might qualify her to ensure we have enough fuel to drive critical infrastructure. Not to mention little things like food reaching the supermarket shelves. She is not the right person for the job. She probably thinks we could use this crisis as an opportunity to further destroy lives and livelihoods as they relentlessly pursue the hopeless goal of changing global temperatures. I am sure she will see it that way. She probably thinks we can all work from home and stop eating meat for the good of the planet. I have no doubt Albanese thinks she will do a great job of whatever it is he thinks he is achieving at our expense. I have no doubt we will be worse off for her best efforts. We have good cause to be very cynical of the current leadership. They won’t even admit there are problems - not in any of the areas where there are many problems - so they won’t be able to properly solve them. We have every right to be worried, and we have little cause to respect them or their leadership at this critical time in our nation’s history. I am afraid that if we don’t vote all of these absolute lightweights out of office at the next election, there won’t be a Nation left. I have no doubt there are problems in the opposition and other camps, but they could not be worse than the problems we have in government. I just want Australia back.
3:03

Anthony Albanese has just appointed the wrong person to head up the Fuel Taskforce. Albanese is a lifelong waste of taxpayers’ money. But much worse than that, he has been out of his depth for his entire career. He now presents an imminent danger to our nation’s prosperity, national security and strategic preparedness. Many people will suffer for his efforts as push-comes-to-shove in our latest fuel crisis. As they say in the playground “it takes one to know one”, and not to be outdone, Albanese has gone and put a lifelong climate zealot and total waste of taxpayer money, Anthea Harris, in charge of his government’s response to the fuel crisis. The clip below, is Anthea giving an address to the ANU in her capacity as the head of the Climate Change Authority back in 2015. She either believes that all of these non-solutions to the non-climate problem are really necessary - which would make her rather daft - or she knows it is all a complete scam, and she is just a scammer… A professional scammer, living on the taxpayer, and living well at that. More, the net result of her work so far has been to help destroy our energy grid and just about everything else relating to our ability to make and do things in Australia. Because cheap and reliable energy is central to everything. Everything. Whether it is coal, gas or liquid fuels, Australia needs these things to provide a first world living standard for the people. She has been an instrumental part of the war on our living standards thus far. All the while they threw our prosperity in the air, put on a blindfold and hoped to catch it in a windmill shaped glove. Now she is in charge of Albanese’s response to our critical, non-critical supply of petrochemicals that are at crisis levels, but we are not in a crisis. If you believe any of what they say… She is not an expert in logistics, or oil supply, petrochemicals or any other area that might qualify her to ensure we have enough fuel to drive critical infrastructure. Not to mention little things like food reaching the supermarket shelves. She is not the right person for the job. She probably thinks we could use this crisis as an opportunity to further destroy lives and livelihoods as they relentlessly pursue the hopeless goal of changing global temperatures. I am sure she will see it that way. She probably thinks we can all work from home and stop eating meat for the good of the planet. I have no doubt Albanese thinks she will do a great job of whatever it is he thinks he is achieving at our expense. I have no doubt we will be worse off for her best efforts. We have good cause to be very cynical of the current leadership. They won’t even admit there are problems - not in any of the areas where there are many problems - so they won’t be able to properly solve them. We have every right to be worried, and we have little cause to respect them or their leadership at this critical time in our nation’s history. I am afraid that if we don’t vote all of these absolute lightweights out of office at the next election, there won’t be a Nation left. I have no doubt there are problems in the opposition and other camps, but they could not be worse than the problems we have in government. I just want Australia back.

Matthew Camenzuli

12,957 views • 5 months ago

David Kipping on why building AI megastructures might be the strongest evidence that we're alone in the universe: The argument starts with something we can already observe: how much energy AI consumes. "One thing we see already with these AI models is how energy hungry they are." P(David|Kipping) ∝ P(Kipping|David) P(David) extrapolates from there. If the only purpose of these data centers is to compute as much as possible as fast as possible, then they'll demand vast amounts of energy. And the orbital data centers that billionaires are getting excited about wouldn't be invisible to us. He explains that such structures would leave a detectable signature: "We should probably see that in James Webb. We could probably already put limits on the existence of essentially artificial rings... emitting a lot of infrared because they're warm." Then comes the unsettling turn. If humanity can build these machines, so could anyone else. And that carries a dark implication. "But if we make that breakthrough, I think the biggest point is it seems to imply that we are alone. Because if we can do it, surely someone else could have done it." This connects to what he refers to as Hart's Fact A. The strange observation that everything we look at in the cosmos appears completely natural: "Everything about the universe: we see stars, galaxies, clouds of plasma. Everything is consistent with nature. There's no hint anywhere of anything artificial, no engineering, nothing in the whole universe. As far as we can see, that's true. That is weird." The more powerful the technology we can imagine, the worse that silence looks. Dyson spheres everywhere, colonising wherever they want, faster-than-light spaceships if any of that is achievable, the sky should be full of evidence. It isn't. "It just massively exacerbates the Fermi paradox to the point where you'd probably conclude this is it." His honest conclusion: "It would make me even more pessimistic about the probabilities of intelligent life in the universe."
1:46

David Kipping on why building AI megastructures might be the strongest evidence that we're alone in the universe: The argument starts with something we can already observe: how much energy AI consumes. "One thing we see already with these AI models is how energy hungry they are." P(David|Kipping) ∝ P(Kipping|David) P(David) extrapolates from there. If the only purpose of these data centers is to compute as much as possible as fast as possible, then they'll demand vast amounts of energy. And the orbital data centers that billionaires are getting excited about wouldn't be invisible to us. He explains that such structures would leave a detectable signature: "We should probably see that in James Webb. We could probably already put limits on the existence of essentially artificial rings... emitting a lot of infrared because they're warm." Then comes the unsettling turn. If humanity can build these machines, so could anyone else. And that carries a dark implication. "But if we make that breakthrough, I think the biggest point is it seems to imply that we are alone. Because if we can do it, surely someone else could have done it." This connects to what he refers to as Hart's Fact A. The strange observation that everything we look at in the cosmos appears completely natural: "Everything about the universe: we see stars, galaxies, clouds of plasma. Everything is consistent with nature. There's no hint anywhere of anything artificial, no engineering, nothing in the whole universe. As far as we can see, that's true. That is weird." The more powerful the technology we can imagine, the worse that silence looks. Dyson spheres everywhere, colonising wherever they want, faster-than-light spaceships if any of that is achievable, the sky should be full of evidence. It isn't. "It just massively exacerbates the Fermi paradox to the point where you'd probably conclude this is it." His honest conclusion: "It would make me even more pessimistic about the probabilities of intelligent life in the universe."

High Signal AI

10,431 views • 3 months ago

FOR THOSE WHO ARE CONFUSED… We experience TIME as a straight line, one moment after another, PAST TO PRESENT TO FUTURE. But that is only how it appears from inside the system. Beings in higher dimensions, what some call “ORACLES” OR “GODS,” do not experience time like this. They do not move through it. They observe it in its entirety. A closer analogy would be CHANNELS ON A SCREEN. What is playing on FOX and what is playing on CBS is not separate in existence, it is only separated by perspective. Both are happening at the same time, fully active, fully real. In the same way, what we call 1950 and what we call 2004 are not distant points moving away from each other. They are both present within the same total field of reality. From that level of awareness, nothing is being “waited on.” There is NO DELAY. There is only ACCESS. A shift of perception is all that is needed, like changing the channel. So if everything exists at once, then your FUTURE is not something that is coming toward you. It is something that already exists. The version of you 20 YEARS FROM NOW is already there. You have already CHOSEN THAT PATH, you have already GONE THROUGH WHAT COMES WITH IT, you have already LIVED THROUGH IT ALL. And what you are doing now is not creating it. You are MOVING THROUGH IT. Slowly remembering why you are there at all.
0:23

FOR THOSE WHO ARE CONFUSED… We experience TIME as a straight line, one moment after another, PAST TO PRESENT TO FUTURE. But that is only how it appears from inside the system. Beings in higher dimensions, what some call “ORACLES” OR “GODS,” do not experience time like this. They do not move through it. They observe it in its entirety. A closer analogy would be CHANNELS ON A SCREEN. What is playing on FOX and what is playing on CBS is not separate in existence, it is only separated by perspective. Both are happening at the same time, fully active, fully real. In the same way, what we call 1950 and what we call 2004 are not distant points moving away from each other. They are both present within the same total field of reality. From that level of awareness, nothing is being “waited on.” There is NO DELAY. There is only ACCESS. A shift of perception is all that is needed, like changing the channel. So if everything exists at once, then your FUTURE is not something that is coming toward you. It is something that already exists. The version of you 20 YEARS FROM NOW is already there. You have already CHOSEN THAT PATH, you have already GONE THROUGH WHAT COMES WITH IT, you have already LIVED THROUGH IT ALL. And what you are doing now is not creating it. You are MOVING THROUGH IT. Slowly remembering why you are there at all.

THE VOICE 🌹 🗣🎙🇺🇸🦅🌎⚓💜♠️CHRIST CONSCIOUSNESS

40,362 views • 2 months ago

This neuroscientist suspects alien civilizations are already here. They’re all around us. They’re millions of years more advanced than us. But they’re not from another planet. They’re not even physical beings. They integrated their consciousness into the fabric of reality itself. And they can interact with us via altered states of consciousness. UFO abductions. DMT experiences. Andrew Gallimore just sat down with AJ Gentile from The Why Files to break down this wild theory: “The idea that the UAP phenomenon … is about biological beings that are arriving from other areas of the universe, I think that’s pretty shortsighted.” “The abduction experience is more of an altered state of consciousness.” “This fits perfectly with DMT.” “In Abduction, John Mack’s first book, there is an account of this … abductee who described these small lively beings kind of bounding around.” “This is a Terence McKenna machine elf trip report.” “It’s exactly the same.” “Rick Strassman also noted that if they had taken some of his [DMT] trip reports out of context and put it in one of John Mack’s books, nobody would’ve questioned it.” “You have this sophisticated laboratory-type environment.” “You’ve got these small beings, like workers.” “Then you have these more powerful, supervising beings that are in the background.” AJ Gentile: “So an abduction, could that be like an endogenous DMT experience?” Gallimore: “It could be.” “We’re dealing with some other kind of intelligence that isn’t necessarily physical, but operates in some other domain.” “I often talk about the anti-Kardashev Scale.” “The Kardashev Scale is the idea that first we occupy this single planet.” “And then … as an intelligent species progresses technologically and cognitively, they start to occupy larger and larger areas of the cosmos.” “But John Barrow, the cosmologist, noted quite correctly that … most of our technological advances have been not outwards, but inwards.” “People get deeper and deeper down into the ground of reality.” “So he developed what he called the Microdimensional Mastery Scale, which is like the anti-Kardashev Scale.” “And he posited something which he referred to as the Omega-Minus level.” “This is when a technological species is able to actually control and manipulate the very ground of reality itself, whatever that is.” “Past the quantum.” “Past even perhaps the Planck scale.” “An intelligent species that had instantiated itself at the ground of reality, perhaps billions of years before our solar system even came to be … how would they communicate with us?” “They’d do it through our brains because that’s how we experience the world.” “Altered states of consciousness.” “DMT is in some way facilitating that experience that allows us to interact with these beings, or conscious agents, or whatever you want to call them.” Andrew Gallimore AJ Gentile The Why Files
6:42

This neuroscientist suspects alien civilizations are already here. They’re all around us. They’re millions of years more advanced than us. But they’re not from another planet. They’re not even physical beings. They integrated their consciousness into the fabric of reality itself. And they can interact with us via altered states of consciousness. UFO abductions. DMT experiences. Andrew Gallimore just sat down with AJ Gentile from The Why Files to break down this wild theory: “The idea that the UAP phenomenon … is about biological beings that are arriving from other areas of the universe, I think that’s pretty shortsighted.” “The abduction experience is more of an altered state of consciousness.” “This fits perfectly with DMT.” “In Abduction, John Mack’s first book, there is an account of this … abductee who described these small lively beings kind of bounding around.” “This is a Terence McKenna machine elf trip report.” “It’s exactly the same.” “Rick Strassman also noted that if they had taken some of his [DMT] trip reports out of context and put it in one of John Mack’s books, nobody would’ve questioned it.” “You have this sophisticated laboratory-type environment.” “You’ve got these small beings, like workers.” “Then you have these more powerful, supervising beings that are in the background.” AJ Gentile: “So an abduction, could that be like an endogenous DMT experience?” Gallimore: “It could be.” “We’re dealing with some other kind of intelligence that isn’t necessarily physical, but operates in some other domain.” “I often talk about the anti-Kardashev Scale.” “The Kardashev Scale is the idea that first we occupy this single planet.” “And then … as an intelligent species progresses technologically and cognitively, they start to occupy larger and larger areas of the cosmos.” “But John Barrow, the cosmologist, noted quite correctly that … most of our technological advances have been not outwards, but inwards.” “People get deeper and deeper down into the ground of reality.” “So he developed what he called the Microdimensional Mastery Scale, which is like the anti-Kardashev Scale.” “And he posited something which he referred to as the Omega-Minus level.” “This is when a technological species is able to actually control and manipulate the very ground of reality itself, whatever that is.” “Past the quantum.” “Past even perhaps the Planck scale.” “An intelligent species that had instantiated itself at the ground of reality, perhaps billions of years before our solar system even came to be … how would they communicate with us?” “They’d do it through our brains because that’s how we experience the world.” “Altered states of consciousness.” “DMT is in some way facilitating that experience that allows us to interact with these beings, or conscious agents, or whatever you want to call them.” Andrew Gallimore AJ Gentile The Why Files

Holden Culotta

16,766 views • 2 months ago

🚨NEW: Joe Rogan just exposed something terrifying with UFO author Diana Pasulka about how top secret parts of the government are reverse engineering alien technology that can fold space and time to deliver nuclear attacks on any location instantaneously without having to travel through a physical distance to hit their target: ROGAN: “There might be something super secretive going on in this university in New York because all the top physicists are in this one place, but no real research comes out of there and they have all this crazy money funneling through it.” PASULKA: “They would get fired at my university for not publishing.” ROGAN: “The research that they’re publishing is nonsense. What they’re really working on is probably some brand new type of propulsion system.” PASULKA: “It’s possible.” ROGAN: “A lot of the stuff we see in the sky is probably ours.” PASULKA: “Shouldn’t we be okay with all this because we’re Americans and they’re looking out for our country?” ROGAN: “If their intentions are good then yes.” PASULKA: “Why are we obsessed with trying to force these people into the public light if it’s going to have a negative effect on our country.” ROGAN: “If there’s a race for the next generation version of a propulsion system then we certainly don’t want China or Russia getting that information.” PASULKA: “Exactly.” ROGAN: “They’re saying this technology can instantaneously deliver nuclear weapon attacks. It’s insane. These systems can fold space and time.” PASULKA: “How do they do that?” ROGAN: “Instead of having to travel from Point A to Point B you can just get to point B instantaneously in 0 seconds. The scary part is when you can do that with a bomb.” PASULKA: “🤯🤯🤯” ROGAN: “Instead of a missile having to fly physically fly to Beijing, it could get there instantly and automatically detonates.” PASULKA: “This is terrifying.” ROGAN: “These knuckleheads are taking this extremely potent technology that UFOs used to get here so they could make bombs that deliver instantaneously.” PASULA: “If this type of technology exists it would be pretty important to know about it.” ROGAN: “It’s kinda their responsibility to figure this out because if China, Russia, or Iran beats us to it then we could be in trouble.” PASULKA: “We can’t let this technology get in the hands of a non ally.” ROGAN: “If they’re genuinely researching this technology to look out for the betterment of America than 100% they should keep their findings a secret. If they tell us then they’re telling China.”
5:45

🚨NEW: Joe Rogan just exposed something terrifying with UFO author Diana Pasulka about how top secret parts of the government are reverse engineering alien technology that can fold space and time to deliver nuclear attacks on any location instantaneously without having to travel through a physical distance to hit their target: ROGAN: “There might be something super secretive going on in this university in New York because all the top physicists are in this one place, but no real research comes out of there and they have all this crazy money funneling through it.” PASULKA: “They would get fired at my university for not publishing.” ROGAN: “The research that they’re publishing is nonsense. What they’re really working on is probably some brand new type of propulsion system.” PASULKA: “It’s possible.” ROGAN: “A lot of the stuff we see in the sky is probably ours.” PASULKA: “Shouldn’t we be okay with all this because we’re Americans and they’re looking out for our country?” ROGAN: “If their intentions are good then yes.” PASULKA: “Why are we obsessed with trying to force these people into the public light if it’s going to have a negative effect on our country.” ROGAN: “If there’s a race for the next generation version of a propulsion system then we certainly don’t want China or Russia getting that information.” PASULKA: “Exactly.” ROGAN: “They’re saying this technology can instantaneously deliver nuclear weapon attacks. It’s insane. These systems can fold space and time.” PASULKA: “How do they do that?” ROGAN: “Instead of having to travel from Point A to Point B you can just get to point B instantaneously in 0 seconds. The scary part is when you can do that with a bomb.” PASULKA: “🤯🤯🤯” ROGAN: “Instead of a missile having to fly physically fly to Beijing, it could get there instantly and automatically detonates.” PASULKA: “This is terrifying.” ROGAN: “These knuckleheads are taking this extremely potent technology that UFOs used to get here so they could make bombs that deliver instantaneously.” PASULA: “If this type of technology exists it would be pretty important to know about it.” ROGAN: “It’s kinda their responsibility to figure this out because if China, Russia, or Iran beats us to it then we could be in trouble.” PASULKA: “We can’t let this technology get in the hands of a non ally.” ROGAN: “If they’re genuinely researching this technology to look out for the betterment of America than 100% they should keep their findings a secret. If they tell us then they’re telling China.”

Fan Commentary: Joe Rogan Recaps

26,528 views • 26 days ago

Obama: America has always had competing stories about who we are and what the nation stands for. The first story says that even though we got rid of a king, there is still a caste system in America, a pecking order of who makes decisions That if somebody doesn't look like or think like you or practice religion the same way you do, they must be a threat to your way of life, and they need to be put in their place. That is how Donald Trump thinks about America. Make America great again by putting the people in charge even if they don't know what the hell they are doing. But here is the thing. That story is not new. It is the oldest story in the book. It is not even uniquely American. For most of human history, that is the way society has worked. For somebody on top and somebody on bottom. There were lords and peasants. For a long time, that story of caste and privilege and concentrated power was the law of the land here in America. If you look like me, you were likely treated as property. If you were a woman, or a white man who did not own property, you could not vote. But from the very start, there was another story, born of this nation's true revolutionary spirit, a story that says, we the people means what it says, that all of us are included, that we are not subjects, but citizens, defined not by race or religion or gender or sexual orientation, but by our commitment to a common creed and a willingness to accept not just privileges, but responsibilities that come with that citizenship.
3:42

Obama: America has always had competing stories about who we are and what the nation stands for. The first story says that even though we got rid of a king, there is still a caste system in America, a pecking order of who makes decisions That if somebody doesn't look like or think like you or practice religion the same way you do, they must be a threat to your way of life, and they need to be put in their place. That is how Donald Trump thinks about America. Make America great again by putting the people in charge even if they don't know what the hell they are doing. But here is the thing. That story is not new. It is the oldest story in the book. It is not even uniquely American. For most of human history, that is the way society has worked. For somebody on top and somebody on bottom. There were lords and peasants. For a long time, that story of caste and privilege and concentrated power was the law of the land here in America. If you look like me, you were likely treated as property. If you were a woman, or a white man who did not own property, you could not vote. But from the very start, there was another story, born of this nation's true revolutionary spirit, a story that says, we the people means what it says, that all of us are included, that we are not subjects, but citizens, defined not by race or religion or gender or sexual orientation, but by our commitment to a common creed and a willingness to accept not just privileges, but responsibilities that come with that citizenship.

Acyn

188,709 views • 10 months ago

Edward Snowden warns that the infrastructure for a Chinese-style social credit system is being built in plain sight. "If any of your activities online, if your purchases, if your associations... are in any way different from what the government... would like them to be, you're no longer able to purchase train tickets. You're no longer able to board an airplane.... You may not be eligible for a job." "All of these things are increasingly being created and programmed and decided by algorithms. And those algorithms are fuelled by precisely the innocent data that our devices are creating all of the time—constantly, invisibly, quietly—right now." "And these activity records are being created and shared and collected... constantly by companies and governments. And ultimately, it means as they sell these... what they are selling is not information. What they are selling is us." "They're selling our future. They're selling our past. They are selling our history, our identity. And ultimately, they are stealing our power." He said all this in 2019. Can you imagine how much worse things have gotten since then?
2:29

Edward Snowden warns that the infrastructure for a Chinese-style social credit system is being built in plain sight. "If any of your activities online, if your purchases, if your associations... are in any way different from what the government... would like them to be, you're no longer able to purchase train tickets. You're no longer able to board an airplane.... You may not be eligible for a job." "All of these things are increasingly being created and programmed and decided by algorithms. And those algorithms are fuelled by precisely the innocent data that our devices are creating all of the time—constantly, invisibly, quietly—right now." "And these activity records are being created and shared and collected... constantly by companies and governments. And ultimately, it means as they sell these... what they are selling is not information. What they are selling is us." "They're selling our future. They're selling our past. They are selling our history, our identity. And ultimately, they are stealing our power." He said all this in 2019. Can you imagine how much worse things have gotten since then?

Wide Awake Media

486,143 views • 8 months ago

Tom DeLonge on UFO's: "There is time dilation caused by the gravity bubble" 👽🛸 "You could fly around and take a Coke can out of somebody's hand and put it in somebody else's hand" He explained to Joe Rogan about real time travel through an artificially created bubble of gravity. They also time travel which is different than what people think in like a movie. When you use the technology you have a time difference between what they are doing inside of an artificially created bubble of gravity of sorts and then what is on the outside. So if you are on the inside of one of those machines everything would be skewed more black and white. There would be like a redshift and everybody would look frozen so you literally could fly around and grab a coke out of someone's hand and put it in someone else's hand. DeLonge credited this description to physicists he consulted including Dr. Hal Puthoff a Nobel nominee and expert in plasma physics and exotic advanced propulsion. The account draws on real concepts like gravitational time dilation and redshift but applies them to claimed breakthrough craft in a striking way that invites discussion on what might actually be possible.
1:26

Tom DeLonge on UFO's: "There is time dilation caused by the gravity bubble" 👽🛸 "You could fly around and take a Coke can out of somebody's hand and put it in somebody else's hand" He explained to Joe Rogan about real time travel through an artificially created bubble of gravity. They also time travel which is different than what people think in like a movie. When you use the technology you have a time difference between what they are doing inside of an artificially created bubble of gravity of sorts and then what is on the outside. So if you are on the inside of one of those machines everything would be skewed more black and white. There would be like a redshift and everybody would look frozen so you literally could fly around and grab a coke out of someone's hand and put it in someone else's hand. DeLonge credited this description to physicists he consulted including Dr. Hal Puthoff a Nobel nominee and expert in plasma physics and exotic advanced propulsion. The account draws on real concepts like gravitational time dilation and redshift but applies them to claimed breakthrough craft in a striking way that invites discussion on what might actually be possible.

Interstellar

104,868 views • 2 months ago

.Naval: If you’re ending up in Forbes 30 under 30 or on the cover of magazines, that’s not conducive to being a good founder. All the value comes from a few hundred genuine, brilliant tinkerers who are there for the love of the game. They’re there for the love of the craft. They’re there because they’re creating something that they want to see exist. I genuinely believe Elon Musk when he says he wants to die on Mars. And so these kinds of people—Ilya Sutskever, the genius behind OpenAI, and Greg Brockman and others, obviously, and Sam Altman—these are people who have been working at the edge of their knowledge to try to figure out something new for decades. They are not there to be famous. Fame is a byproduct. And honestly, anyone who’s on this stage, like me, talking about this—you shouldn’t trust 100%. We’re not the real deal. The real deal, the real power, the real knowledge, the real wealth, the real creativity derives from a small number of modern, you could call them scientist inventors—the new Thomas Edisons, the Henry Fords, the Nikola Teslas. Interviewer: And who are they? Naval: Who are the new ones? They’re people you’ve never heard of. They’re that geeky kid standing in the corner at the AI hackathon who’s shipping something that you can barely even understand or describe. You can find a lot of them on Twitter, but good luck sorting out the wheat from the chaff. By the time they’re known and they’re famous, then maybe, like Elon, they still have ambition and they still keep driving. But they’re not the true builders underneath.
1:29

.Naval: If you’re ending up in Forbes 30 under 30 or on the cover of magazines, that’s not conducive to being a good founder. All the value comes from a few hundred genuine, brilliant tinkerers who are there for the love of the game. They’re there for the love of the craft. They’re there because they’re creating something that they want to see exist. I genuinely believe Elon Musk when he says he wants to die on Mars. And so these kinds of people—Ilya Sutskever, the genius behind OpenAI, and Greg Brockman and others, obviously, and Sam Altman—these are people who have been working at the edge of their knowledge to try to figure out something new for decades. They are not there to be famous. Fame is a byproduct. And honestly, anyone who’s on this stage, like me, talking about this—you shouldn’t trust 100%. We’re not the real deal. The real deal, the real power, the real knowledge, the real wealth, the real creativity derives from a small number of modern, you could call them scientist inventors—the new Thomas Edisons, the Henry Fords, the Nikola Teslas. Interviewer: And who are they? Naval: Who are the new ones? They’re people you’ve never heard of. They’re that geeky kid standing in the corner at the AI hackathon who’s shipping something that you can barely even understand or describe. You can find a lot of them on Twitter, but good luck sorting out the wheat from the chaff. By the time they’re known and they’re famous, then maybe, like Elon, they still have ambition and they still keep driving. But they’re not the true builders underneath.

Arjun Khemani

305,456 views • 2 years ago