Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Arena Magazine Ginevra Lily Davis argues creating superintelligence could fulfill humanity's search for the meaning of life: "The argument is essentially that pretty much every religious tradition throughout human history has had this fundamental structure of connecting ordinary human life to some kind of ultimate cosmic purpose that is...

38,706 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Timothy Alberino just warned Joe Rogan that we’re on the brink of apocalypse. But not the kind you think. He calls it a “post-human apocalypse.” Tech oligarchs are obsessed with “transhumanism.” “Technology is ascending.” “We’re declining.” “And I’m not in favor of that.” “I’m not a transhumanist.” “We poison our environment.” “We poison our bodies.” “But it’s clear to me that we … are degenerating.” “This is genetic degeneration.” “We have what’s called mutational load.” “Mutational load is all of the deleterious mutations … that happen in our genome.” “They compile, and it becomes this genetic burden.” “You can’t just have a good diet and regain the capabilities that were lost.” “The human species is essentially becoming reproductively inviable.” “The sperm count of males in the West is declining precipitously.” “As is our fitness.” “We’re going to need a technological intervention like artificial wombs.” “The result of this is going to be what I describe as post-human apocalypse.” “If you come from a biblical paradigm like I do, the first man, Adam … has all of the incredible capabilities that are innate.” “He keeps communing with his maker.” “He can do all of these amazing things.” “Then as we become copies of copies of copies of copies of copies of Adam all the way down, we’re gradually losing these abilities.” “But I think that some of them are still latent in the human species.” “And I think that explains remote viewing and telepathy and things like that.” Timothy Alberino Joe Rogan

Holden Culotta

74,420 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Today is my 37th birthday. Yesterday I went to the US senate and spoke my truth - as a physician, as a woman, and a living being striving to act on the signals I am perceiving and the intuition I feel. If there is one thing I feel at this moment in my life at 37, it is that cultivating healthy bodies is of real importance as it is one of the ways that we honor this mysterious MIRACLE of life and nurture the material receiver through which we might be able to connect with spirit, with God. Our unhealthy bodies are a distraction and impediment to the bliss that we can experience right now in the simple recognition of our oneness with all things. Right now, many levers of society in our material world make being healthy extremely challenging for so many. There is mass suffering that needn’t be, because we are - I believe - distraction, confused, and lost, In the swirl of the cosmos, there is something happening in our little corner that feels like it glitching. Life is on assault. Our Earth, the Mother through which God allowed us to come into human form by assembling atoms from her into us, is being destroyed at our own hands, and so of course, so are we. We have broken the cycles of life, and so we are, or course, breaking. I don’t believe the answers to this are going to be strictly technological, because technology often seems to have the intent of outsmarting nature, with I don’t think is possible. I believe they need to be based in humility, care, and respect for our Mother. 🌎 We, together, can right all of this. I think we can do it rapidly. I think we NEED to do it rapidly. We can protect our earth, protect each other, and get back on track to pursue our highest calling in this precious moment in this lifetime. This is what I came to say to the US government yesterday. PROFOUNDLY grateful to the other speakers on the panel, Senator Ron Johnson , Robert F. Kennedy Jr , and Calley Means for leadership on this panel.

Casey Means, MD

692,454 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

I am a physicist and I'm profoundly opposed to any idea of non-physical explanations that contradict physics. So that's a no-no and really doesn't make sense. However, there are ways in which both emergent properties such as minds and life and so on have an effect. And as you said, also abstractions. Now the fact that the theory of good explanations led to the idea that abstractions are real things was slightly surprising to me. I wasn't expecting the link, at least wasn't expecting it to be so strong as it is. But the thing is, if you think about how to explain events, physical events like a footprint on the moon, how do you explain how that happened? Well, it happened because of human ideas, of science. And human ideas, you could say in this reductionist sense that as you rightly say is the prevailing mode of explanation and the prevailing idea is to look down on other modes of explanation, that those ideas are nothing more than configurations of atoms. So some physicists, some rocket scientists put their brain into certain configurations of atoms and those atoms then acted on other atoms which then ended up making a footprint on the moon. Now what that misses is the explanation of why certain configurations of atoms put footprints on the moon while others, the overwhelming majority of configurations that human brains, even human brains have been put into in history, do not have that effect. And it's because there's a certain type of information. And this information can't in my view be reduced to statements about atoms because if you think about what that information does, it is in brains but the same information then gets transferred into, let's say, sound waves in air and then it gets transferred into ink on paper and then it gets transferred into magnetic domains inside a computer which then control a machine that instantiates those ideas in bits of steel and silicon and so on and so on. There's an immense chain of instantiations of the same information. And it's only special kinds of information that have this property that they are preserved and instantiated in successive physical modes. So what is being transmitted, what is having the causal effect is not the atoms but the fact that the atoms instantiate certain kinds of information and not other kinds. So therefore it is the information that is having the causal effect. If a particular instantiation of that information were damaged, then processes would come along to fix it, whether or not they could fix the physical instantiation. For example, if the computer goes wrong, then we don't use the corrupted information. We go back and rescue the information from a different computer and we throw away the atoms that at one point instantiated it. So the information causes itself to remain in existence. Now I think there's no way out of that mode of explanation. And if explanation is going to be the fundamental thing about our criterion, for example, about what is or isn't real, then we have to say that information and this particular kind which we call knowledge is real and really does cause things. David Deutsch

Deutsch Explains

45,735 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce