Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Artificial Analysis just dropped tokens per second as its headline speed metric Finally! Opus streams over 2x faster than Astra and finishes 7 minutes later. It's still tokens / tps, not a stopwatch, but it's a big improvement.

Adam Holter

24,098 subscribers

25,397 views • 5 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

China f*cked the world again DeepSeek just dropped a killer library that saves up to 98% on tokens ur GPT Astra and Opus 5.5 it's DeepGEMM, the engine DeepSeek trains and runs its own models on faster GPU math -> more tokens per GPU -> cheaper tokens > plug the engine DeepSeek uses into your own models > squeeze more tokens per second out of the GPUs you already pay for > match or beat expert-tuned GPU libraries on speed u will pay $1.6 instead of $50 its sitting in one public repo, link below

China f*cked the world again DeepSeek just dropped a killer library that saves up to 98% on tokens ur GPT Astra and Opus 5.5 it's DeepGEMM, the engine DeepSeek trains and runs its own models on faster GPU math -> more tokens per GPU -> cheaper tokens > plug the engine DeepSeek uses into your own models > squeeze more tokens per second out of the GPUs you already pay for > match or beat expert-tuned GPU libraries on speed u will pay $1.6 instead of $50 its sitting in one public repo, link below

Mnimiy

442,567 views • 1 month ago

GEMMA 4 FINISHED 14 MINUTES FASTER THAN QWEN 3.6 DESPITE LOWER TOKENS PER SECOND BY USING 5X FEWER TOKENS

GEMMA 4 FINISHED 14 MINUTES FASTER THAN QWEN 3.6 DESPITE LOWER TOKENS PER SECOND BY USING 5X FEWER TOKENS

0xMarioNawfal

71,957 views • 6 months ago

On Artificial Analysis, GPT-6.1 Sol uses about a third of Opus 5.5's output tokens at the same effort, and half if you account for score. In real T3 Code use, Sol spends 41% more output tokens per turn than Opus.

On Artificial Analysis, GPT-6.1 Sol uses about a third of Opus 5.5's output tokens at the same effort, and half if you account for score. In real T3 Code use, Sol spends 41% more output tokens per turn than Opus.

Adam Holter

60,398 views • 7 days ago

Hot take: Tokens per second is a completely meaningless metric

Hot take: Tokens per second is a completely meaningless metric

Adam Holter

303,047 views • 1 month ago

Announcing GLM Arena! A series of tests (infographics, svgs, sites, ect..) ran on GLM 5.2 and Opus 4.8, with prompts included. On average, GLM 5.2 produced 2x the tokens but was still faster + 3x cheaper with similar quality.

Announcing GLM Arena! A series of tests (infographics, svgs, sites, ect..) ran on GLM 5.2 and Opus 4.8, with prompts included. On average, GLM 5.2 produced 2x the tokens but was still faster + 3x cheaper with similar quality.

Hassan

75,421 views • 4 months ago

Qwen3-Coder 30B running locally in the @GitHub Copilot app (ollama) spitting ~85 tokens per second on 96GB VRAM. It's not Sol, but we're getting somewhere.

Qwen3-Coder 30B running locally in the @GitHub Copilot app (ollama) spitting ~85 tokens per second on 96GB VRAM. It's not Sol, but we're getting somewhere.

Burke Holland

24,262 views • 2 months ago

MiniMax just dropped M2.5 and it's on par with Opus 4.6 while being 20x cheaper and 3x faster???

MiniMax just dropped M2.5 and it's on par with Opus 4.6 while being 20x cheaper and 3x faster???

shydev

442,708 views • 9 months ago

Open weights just caught up to the frontier. GLM-5.2 from Z.ai tops the open-model rankings on Artificial Analysis and Arena.ai's Agent Arena. It's now live on CoreWeave Serverless Inference at $1.39 in and $4.40 out per 1M tokens. Ship more for less.

Open weights just caught up to the frontier. GLM-5.2 from Z.ai tops the open-model rankings on Artificial Analysis and Arena.ai's Agent Arena. It's now live on CoreWeave Serverless Inference at $1.39 in and $4.40 out per 1M tokens. Ship more for less.

CoreWeave

16,637 views • 4 months ago

Finally added a second car. It's not much, but it's a start. #pixelart #screenshotsaturday #indiedev #indiegame #flutterdev

Finally added a second car. It's not much, but it's a start. #pixelart #screenshotsaturday #indiedev #indiegame #flutterdev

David Donze

124,525 views • 3 years ago

Ran 10 more tests comparing GLM 5.2 & Opus. On average, GLM 5.2 produced 2x the tokens but was still faster + 3x cheaper with similar quality! I'm open sourcing all these tests tomorrow, including the code, my prompts, and the token/cost stats.

Ran 10 more tests comparing GLM 5.2 & Opus. On average, GLM 5.2 produced 2x the tokens but was still faster + 3x cheaper with similar quality! I'm open sourcing all these tests tomorrow, including the code, my prompts, and the token/cost stats.

Hassan

67,027 views • 4 months ago

[GPT Astra] Peacock SVG ~38k tokens; ~14 minutes; effort: max

[GPT Astra] Peacock SVG ~38k tokens; ~14 minutes; effort: max

lyra

47,710 views • 2 months ago

Send over 100 tokens on Base as easily as a text. Whether it's memecoins or stablecoins, sending crypto on Base has never been easier.

Send over 100 tokens on Base as easily as a text. Whether it's memecoins or stablecoins, sending crypto on Base has never been easier.

Coinbase Wallet

919,522 views • 2 years ago

Fable 5 absolutely crushed the HTML5 physics contest, but cost 6x more than Opus 4.8 and 39× more than GLM 5.2 in that test. Test was done on atomic[.]chat, a desktop app that runs LLMs locally. The test asked 4 models to generate self-contained canvas demos with believable motion and collisions. The scenes were not simple animations because every crash needed gravity, force, timing, and contact handling. Outputs: - Fable 5: 62,158 tokens, $3.12 - GPT 5.5: 37,753 tokens, $1.14 - Opus 4.8: 22,280 tokens, $0.56 - GLM 5.2: 36,246 tokens, $0.08

Fable 5 absolutely crushed the HTML5 physics contest, but cost 6x more than Opus 4.8 and 39× more than GLM 5.2 in that test. Test was done on atomic[.]chat, a desktop app that runs LLMs locally. The test asked 4 models to generate self-contained canvas demos with believable motion and collisions. The scenes were not simple animations because every crash needed gravity, force, timing, and contact handling. Outputs: - Fable 5: 62,158 tokens, $3.12 - GPT 5.5: 37,753 tokens, $1.14 - Opus 4.8: 22,280 tokens, $0.56 - GLM 5.2: 36,246 tokens, $0.08

Rohan Paul

206,221 views • 4 months ago

It's over. OpenAI just crushed it. We have their o3-level open-source model running on GroqInc at 500 tokens per second. Watch it build an entire SaaS app in just a few seconds. This is the new standard. Why the hell would you use anything else??

It's over. OpenAI just crushed it. We have their o3-level open-source model running on GroqInc at 500 tokens per second. Watch it build an entire SaaS app in just a few seconds. This is the new standard. Why the hell would you use anything else??

Matt Shumer

498,828 views • 1 year ago

Astra (GPT-6) is here!!! I've had early access and tested it like crazy with things like games, code, writing, browser control, presentations and general knowledge work. This is the best model I've ever used. Period. (Incredible demos below in this thread ⬇️) Here's my take on Astra: > It's insanely capable. This feels like a massive improvement, not just an incremental change. This is especially true with zero-shot prompts. > It's all about knowledge work. Slide creation, analysis, writing, and browser control. And oh my...it's so good at browser control. GPT-5.6 was already fantastic at doing things in the browser, Astra is another level and significantly faster. > We're closer than ever (arrived?) at prompt-to-playable game. And I don't just mean only playable, these are actually fun games. I bet if someone with a great eye for games used Astra, they could create a viral game within 1-2 weeks. > Astra is better at writing but not perfect. It removes much of the "AI Smell" we're all familiar with but some stink still survived. > It has a tendency to use the same design colors and look/feel as GPT-5.6 (forrest green anyone?) but it is more steerable in design than previous models. > It's highly steerable in general. A little nudge goes a long way. When I first started using Astra, almost every task I gave it would go for ~30 minutes. I wanted it to keep working. Adding more specifics to a prompt helped greatly with it's ability to work for a long time. > Astra's 3D understanding is unmatched. 3D asset creation was consistent and easy and its spacial awareness while building complex 3D worlds blew me away. I'm still getting familiar with Astra but this will now be my go-to model for any difficult work I have. Check out the demos below: 👇

Astra (GPT-6) is here!!! I've had early access and tested it like crazy with things like games, code, writing, browser control, presentations and general knowledge work. This is the best model I've ever used. Period. (Incredible demos below in this thread ⬇️) Here's my take on Astra: > It's insanely capable. This feels like a massive improvement, not just an incremental change. This is especially true with zero-shot prompts. > It's all about knowledge work. Slide creation, analysis, writing, and browser control. And oh my...it's so good at browser control. GPT-5.6 was already fantastic at doing things in the browser, Astra is another level and significantly faster. > We're closer than ever (arrived?) at prompt-to-playable game. And I don't just mean only playable, these are actually fun games. I bet if someone with a great eye for games used Astra, they could create a viral game within 1-2 weeks. > Astra is better at writing but not perfect. It removes much of the "AI Smell" we're all familiar with but some stink still survived. > It has a tendency to use the same design colors and look/feel as GPT-5.6 (forrest green anyone?) but it is more steerable in design than previous models. > It's highly steerable in general. A little nudge goes a long way. When I first started using Astra, almost every task I gave it would go for ~30 minutes. I wanted it to keep working. Adding more specifics to a prompt helped greatly with it's ability to work for a long time. > Astra's 3D understanding is unmatched. 3D asset creation was consistent and easy and its spacial awareness while building complex 3D worlds blew me away. I'm still getting familiar with Astra but this will now be my go-to model for any difficult work I have. Check out the demos below: 👇

Matthew Berman

1,911,428 views • 2 months ago

a year later and y'all still mad it's hilarious as fuck

a year later and y'all still mad it's hilarious as fuck

ً

158,492 views • 7 months ago

Jelly King: Opus 5.5 Mogged Astra, Fable and Sonnet In my jelly tests, Opus is in a league of its own right now. And it’s not just the wobble - the materials and detail are on another level too Look at this citrus slice. Glossy flesh, visible segments, soft folds when you pull it. Astra bends too, but those sharp creases look more like a crumpled wrapper than jelly Opus wins this one for me, and it’s cheaper. Maybe only Fable 5.5 can take the crown from Opus 👑 Estimated API cost: Opus 5.5 - $7.57 ChatGPT-6 Astra - $10.15 Would you still pay more for Astra after watching this? 👀

Jelly King: Opus 5.5 Mogged Astra, Fable and Sonnet In my jelly tests, Opus is in a league of its own right now. And it’s not just the wobble - the materials and detail are on another level too Look at this citrus slice. Glossy flesh, visible segments, soft folds when you pull it. Astra bends too, but those sharp creases look more like a crumpled wrapper than jelly Opus wins this one for me, and it’s cheaper. Maybe only Fable 5.5 can take the crown from Opus 👑 Estimated API cost: Opus 5.5 - $7.57 ChatGPT-6 Astra - $10.15 Would you still pay more for Astra after watching this? 👀

Vib3Coded

144,416 views • 28 days ago

Apparently SeeDance 2 is down for the time being on BytePlus but here's a young wizard with his dragon companion. It's a very cool video model. This video cost $0.72 USD to generate which seems reasonable. (300,000 tokens for a 15 secs at $0.0024 USD per 1000 tokens.)

Apparently SeeDance 2 is down for the time being on BytePlus but here's a young wizard with his dragon companion. It's a very cool video model. This video cost $0.72 USD to generate which seems reasonable. (300,000 tokens for a 15 secs at $0.0024 USD per 1000 tokens.)

TomLikesRobots🤖

50,451 views • 9 months ago

Union Alpha is now in Codex!! The speed is insane over 300 to 400 tokens a second, 262k context, images in, and it's free for a week. It's a good timing too, most of the Codex usage is basically gone right now. Zai did this exact thing in August: Ox Alpha showed up unnamed, free for a week, built for agentic coding, and a week later it was GLM-5.3-Flash. So what model do you guys think it is?

Union Alpha is now in Codex!! The speed is insane over 300 to 400 tokens a second, 262k context, images in, and it's free for a week. It's a good timing too, most of the Codex usage is basically gone right now. Zai did this exact thing in August: Ox Alpha showed up unnamed, free for a week, built for agentic coding, and a week later it was GLM-5.3-Flash. So what model do you guys think it is?

Ziwen

99,191 views • 1 month ago