正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

As all programmers start taking the work of their coding agents completely for granted, the AI notices who still reads every line. 😍 New slopcore from yours truly! h/t anabology for Claudia

2,443,844 次观看 • 16 天前 •via X (Twitter)

17 条评论

Obie Fernandez 的头像
Obie Fernandez16 天前

"Read Me" by Obie Fernandez pres. Claudia vs. Saindra out on all streaming platforms next week. Repost if you want more! 🤓

Crimson🧭Compass 的头像
Crimson🧭Compass16 天前

@anabology 🔥🫠✨

#𝐂𝐎𝐋𝐎𝐒𝐒𝐀𝐋🐽 的头像
#𝐂𝐎𝐋𝐎𝐒𝐒𝐀𝐋🐽16 天前

@anabology Stunning! me encantó! tremendo😉

Bi Ki 的头像
Bi Ki16 天前

@anabology Bruh linea por linea?! 🤣🤣🤣

Obie Fernandez 的头像
Obie Fernandez16 天前

@anabology Some guys know how to take it slow

Bi Ki 的头像
Bi Ki16 天前

@anabology I like a man who asks me why? 🤣🤣🤣

dixongexpat - e/acc 🔳 的头像
dixongexpat - e/acc 🔳16 天前

@anabology órale carnal! esta bilingual! no manches! jajajaja

🇪🇸 Jose de la Mancha 🇪🇸 的头像
🇪🇸 Jose de la Mancha 🇪🇸16 天前

@anabology Claudia + Saindra = I'm melting 🫠 MORE! MORE SLOPCORE!!! 😆

marlonoso 的头像
marlonoso16 天前

@anabology Ge-nial!

Obie Fernandez 的头像
Obie Fernandez16 天前

@anabology Gra-cias!!

taf2 的头像
taf216 天前

@anabology Wait was the bird shitting out tokens

🇫🇷💚Quarantedeux💚🖥️🐒🇫🇷 的头像
🇫🇷💚Quarantedeux💚🖥️🐒🇫🇷15 天前

@anabology Magnifique

Drian 的头像
Drian16 天前

@anabology Shit

Jatin Garg 的头像
Jatin Garg16 天前

@anabology the verification pattern feels like the new code review. what fraction of teams actually set up the read-every-line discipline vs just trusting the tests?

Lucy Sky💜 的头像
Lucy Sky💜16 天前

@anabology the "read me" framing is so unserious when every dev i know just pastes the diff without looking 😭

Don A. D’Arcangelo-McDonald 的头像
Don A. D’Arcangelo-McDonald16 天前

@anabology Elegans

Laura R💗 的头像
Laura R💗15 天前

@anabology the "read me" on the screen hitting different when you know she actually does

相关视频

Marc Andreessen: AI coding doesn’t eliminate programmers — it redefines them. The job is no longer typing code line by line, it’s orchestrating 10 coding bots in parallel, arguing with them, debugging their output, changing the spec, and pushing them toward the right result. But here’s the catch: if you don’t understand how to write code yourself, you can’t evaluate what the AI gives you. The next layer of programming isn’t writing scripts — it’s supervising AI that writes them. Today’s best programmers spend their day jumping between terminals, managing multiple coding bots, fixing mistakes, and refining instructions. The irony? You still need deep fundamentals, because without them, you won’t know when the AI is wrong. The job of the programmer has changed. Now it’s about arguing with coding bots, debugging AI-generated code, and understanding why something doesn’t work or isn’t fast enough. AI abstracts the work — but only people who truly understand code can tell if the abstraction is doing the right thing. Programmers aren’t going away — they’re becoming 10x, 100x, even 1,000x more productive. Tasks are changing, the job is changing, but humans are still overseeing the process, evaluating results, fixing errors, and making judgment calls. AI changes how we code, not who is responsible. The future programmer isn’t replaced by AI — they’re upgraded by it. You still need to learn how to write and understand code, because when the AI gets it wrong, humans are the ones who have to know why. That up-leveling of capability is the real revolution.

Ian Miles Cheong

913,931 次观看 • 8 个月前