Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

As predicted, Govt managed to get Public Examination Amendment Bill introduced amidst chaos & protests in the House. Several MPs had given their names to oppose introduction of Bill (which they have a right to). Speaker quickly went through their names as a formality and the Bill was introduced.... show more

Maadhyam

9,453 subscribers

52,391 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

BREAKING The Liberals have forced C-9 through the Justice Committee after barring debate and amendments to their anti-religious freedom bill. The bill will now return to the House of Commons.

BREAKING The Liberals have forced C-9 through the Justice Committee after barring debate and amendments to their anti-religious freedom bill. The bill will now return to the House of Commons.

Andrew Lawton

49,292 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Gone in SEVEN minutes! On #OnlineGamingBill2025, the process of law making in #Parliament itself was reduced to a game 👏👏 Showing amazing speed, the #OnlineGamingBill, cleared by cabinet only yesterday, introduced in #LokSabha only hours ago, was just passed by the House, WITHOUT any debate, WITHIN 7 minutes. At 5.02pm, IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnav moved motion to consider and pass the Bill. He spoke for 4 minutes. At 5.06pm, Speaker asked protesting MPs to go back to their seat, to debate Bill. Then he immediately takes up Bill for consideration. On his motion to take up the Bill, a loud 'Nooooooooo' can be heard (see video). He still went ahead and put Bill to clause by clause vote. By 5.09pm, the Bill was passed! NO wasting time on sending bill to committee, debate and deliberation. Only speed, productivity and efficiency 👏👏 #Parliament #MonsoonSession2025

Gone in SEVEN minutes! On #OnlineGamingBill2025, the process of law making in #Parliament itself was reduced to a game 👏👏 Showing amazing speed, the #OnlineGamingBill, cleared by cabinet only yesterday, introduced in #LokSabha only hours ago, was just passed by the House, WITHOUT any debate, WITHIN 7 minutes. At 5.02pm, IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnav moved motion to consider and pass the Bill. He spoke for 4 minutes. At 5.06pm, Speaker asked protesting MPs to go back to their seat, to debate Bill. Then he immediately takes up Bill for consideration. On his motion to take up the Bill, a loud 'Nooooooooo' can be heard (see video). He still went ahead and put Bill to clause by clause vote. By 5.09pm, the Bill was passed! NO wasting time on sending bill to committee, debate and deliberation. Only speed, productivity and efficiency 👏👏 #Parliament #MonsoonSession2025

Maadhyam

17,029 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Mitron, #LokSabha just passed the 500+ clause #IncomeTaxBill WITHOUT any debate, within JUST 3 MINUTES 👏👏 (Must see video👇) But it didn't stop at that! Immediately after that, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2025 was also passed WITHOUT any debate, in next 1 MINUTE 👏👏 Oh, and before we forget to mention, both these Bills were introduced today itself, just 2 hours before being passed. They were added to the agenda of House through a supplementary list🤭 So, anyway, no MP would have gotten a chance to read the loooong bills, so they did away with debate altogether. Very convenient, no? During this, in background there were protests on #SIR, #VoteChori and chants of "Loktantra ki hatya bandh karo" (stop murdering #democracy), "Shame, Shame!" could be heard! But even this wasn't enough! Earlier at 2pm, National #Sports Governance Bill, 2025 + National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill, 2025 were passed within JUST 34 minutes👏👏 - Combined these Bills have 45+ clauses - Only 2 MPs spoke on the Bill - Minister alone spoke for ~14 mins - Voting went on for ~7 mins - Protests were going on in background - Opposition MPs had moved amendments, which were summarily dismissed as they were either protesting or not in House (can't be sure as Sansad TV doesn't show opposition MPs) Isn't #Parliament so efficient and productive today?

Mitron, #LokSabha just passed the 500+ clause #IncomeTaxBill WITHOUT any debate, within JUST 3 MINUTES 👏👏 (Must see video👇) But it didn't stop at that! Immediately after that, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2025 was also passed WITHOUT any debate, in next 1 MINUTE 👏👏 Oh, and before we forget to mention, both these Bills were introduced today itself, just 2 hours before being passed. They were added to the agenda of House through a supplementary list🤭 So, anyway, no MP would have gotten a chance to read the loooong bills, so they did away with debate altogether. Very convenient, no? During this, in background there were protests on #SIR, #VoteChori and chants of "Loktantra ki hatya bandh karo" (stop murdering #democracy), "Shame, Shame!" could be heard! But even this wasn't enough! Earlier at 2pm, National #Sports Governance Bill, 2025 + National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill, 2025 were passed within JUST 34 minutes👏👏 - Combined these Bills have 45+ clauses - Only 2 MPs spoke on the Bill - Minister alone spoke for ~14 mins - Voting went on for ~7 mins - Protests were going on in background - Opposition MPs had moved amendments, which were summarily dismissed as they were either protesting or not in House (can't be sure as Sansad TV doesn't show opposition MPs) Isn't #Parliament so efficient and productive today?

Maadhyam

381,747 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

It must come on record that despite widespread protests & repeated demand from Opposition to send #TransgenderBill to a #Parliament Committee, Govt insisted on pushing it through by making unsubstantiated claims! See video👇 First, it's rare that debate on one Bill is stopped to take up another Bill. The debate on #Finance Bill was going on and Transgender Bill was listed AFTER it, but Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju asked for the Transgender Bill to be taken up & 'passed' today and for Finance Minister to reply to debate on Finance Bill tomorrow. It is only when a Minister is not available to respond to debate on a Bill, that it is postponed, but Finance Minister is sitting right there! What is the rush to pass #TransBill in #LokSabha today itself? Second, as Rijiju seeks sense of the House, several MPs from the Opposition, in fact, oppose and categorically demand that Bill be sent to a Select Committee to consult with stakeholders from Trans community. They even say that they raised this demand in Business Advisory Committee meeting as well and Rijiju concedes to this. Rijiju himself says that Congress, SP, AITC and NCP(SP) made a request for Bill to be sent to Committee. And then Rijiju makes several unsubstantiated claims: 1. It's not a major amendment Bill - amendments to exclude self-identification are not major? 2. Extensive debate have already happened on Bill - When? The Bill was never placed in public domain as Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy 2014 mandates. Where has this debate happened? Who participated in it? 3. The amendment has come after a year long debate in Standing Committee - When? Which Committee? In the last 1 year, the Standing Committee on Social Justice & Empowerment has not produced any specific report on any topic related to #Transgender persons. Even the Statement of Objects & Reasons of the Bill doesn't mention any recommendation from a Standing Committee report. 4. We are not going against any community - why are people from trans community protesting the Bill then? So, if the Bill is very good, very important, for the welfare of people from Transgender community, then why is the Govt not willing to send the Bill to a Committee? Rijiju keeps saying - Bill has to be passed today, let's not delay. An MP can be heard in the background asking - "itni jaldi kya hai"? Indeed, why the rush? Why does Govt keep taking short cuts for law making and avoid public consultations?

It must come on record that despite widespread protests & repeated demand from Opposition to send #TransgenderBill to a #Parliament Committee, Govt insisted on pushing it through by making unsubstantiated claims! See video👇 First, it's rare that debate on one Bill is stopped to take up another Bill. The debate on #Finance Bill was going on and Transgender Bill was listed AFTER it, but Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju asked for the Transgender Bill to be taken up & 'passed' today and for Finance Minister to reply to debate on Finance Bill tomorrow. It is only when a Minister is not available to respond to debate on a Bill, that it is postponed, but Finance Minister is sitting right there! What is the rush to pass #TransBill in #LokSabha today itself? Second, as Rijiju seeks sense of the House, several MPs from the Opposition, in fact, oppose and categorically demand that Bill be sent to a Select Committee to consult with stakeholders from Trans community. They even say that they raised this demand in Business Advisory Committee meeting as well and Rijiju concedes to this. Rijiju himself says that Congress, SP, AITC and NCP(SP) made a request for Bill to be sent to Committee. And then Rijiju makes several unsubstantiated claims: 1. It's not a major amendment Bill - amendments to exclude self-identification are not major? 2. Extensive debate have already happened on Bill - When? The Bill was never placed in public domain as Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy 2014 mandates. Where has this debate happened? Who participated in it? 3. The amendment has come after a year long debate in Standing Committee - When? Which Committee? In the last 1 year, the Standing Committee on Social Justice & Empowerment has not produced any specific report on any topic related to #Transgender persons. Even the Statement of Objects & Reasons of the Bill doesn't mention any recommendation from a Standing Committee report. 4. We are not going against any community - why are people from trans community protesting the Bill then? So, if the Bill is very good, very important, for the welfare of people from Transgender community, then why is the Govt not willing to send the Bill to a Committee? Rijiju keeps saying - Bill has to be passed today, let's not delay. An MP can be heard in the background asking - "itni jaldi kya hai"? Indeed, why the rush? Why does Govt keep taking short cuts for law making and avoid public consultations?

Maadhyam

31,352 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

It takes Sarah Olney 2 minutes to read out all the powers given to ministers in the Bill. She decries how much is to be left to regulations, how little certainty MPs will have at third reading, and if they pass the bill how little say MPs will get. "A massive blank cheque".

It takes Sarah Olney 2 minutes to read out all the powers given to ministers in the Bill. She decries how much is to be left to regulations, how little certainty MPs will have at third reading, and if they pass the bill how little say MPs will get. "A massive blank cheque".

Nikki da Costa

46,654 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Constitutional Amendment Bill (N0.3) unanimously passes to committee stage The contentious Constitutional Amendment Bill (N0.3) unanimously passed to the committee stage in the National Assembly earlier in the afternoon after the opposition neglected or failed to call for a critical division of the house for MPs opposed to the legislative changes to vote against it. About 30 MPs were opposed to the bill in its entirety after a record-breaking fierce debate. The failure by the opposition to call for division of the house let the bill, which has far-reaching political implications, pass to the committee stage unanimously, without formal opposition. In terms of process, the presiding officer first judges the will of the house using a voice vote ("Ayes" vs. "Nays"). If an MP challenges the presiding officer's ruling, they then can call for a division of the house. Bells are rung to summon all lawmakers to the chamber, the doors are locked, and MPs must physically move to opposite sides of the house (or have their names recorded) to provide an exact, verified tally of votes. A minimum simple majority was required to pass the bill to the committee stage. The committee stage of the bill is the third step in the legislative process. It is a detailed, clause-by-clause examination of the proposals that takes place after the second reading and general debate. During the committee stage, the house resolves into a committee of the whole house rather than meeting as the standard legislative body, allowing for more conversational and repeated speaking opportunities. Members meticulously scrutinise each section or clause of the bill. The committee goes through the bill clause-by-clause sequentially, voting on each clause or block of clauses. MPs and ministers can propose specific alterations, additions, or removals to individual clauses. Any proposed amendment is debated, and the committee votes on whether to accept or reject the change. Once the committee finishes reviewing all clauses and finalising amendments, the bill moves to the report stage, where the committee officially reports its work back to the house for final confirmation before the third reading. Because it is where the exact wording of the proposed law or amendment is finalised, this phase is often heavily debated. For example, this bill required intense, late-night debate in the National Assembly last night before advancing to the committee stage. After the amendments have been adopted, another vote is called in the house to pass the bill by a two-thirds majority before the same process is repeated in the upper house, senate. If senate makes some changes to the bill, it then goes back to the lower house, National Assembly, for voting before being to sent to the President for assent.

Constitutional Amendment Bill (N0.3) unanimously passes to committee stage The contentious Constitutional Amendment Bill (N0.3) unanimously passed to the committee stage in the National Assembly earlier in the afternoon after the opposition neglected or failed to call for a critical division of the house for MPs opposed to the legislative changes to vote against it. About 30 MPs were opposed to the bill in its entirety after a record-breaking fierce debate. The failure by the opposition to call for division of the house let the bill, which has far-reaching political implications, pass to the committee stage unanimously, without formal opposition. In terms of process, the presiding officer first judges the will of the house using a voice vote ("Ayes" vs. "Nays"). If an MP challenges the presiding officer's ruling, they then can call for a division of the house. Bells are rung to summon all lawmakers to the chamber, the doors are locked, and MPs must physically move to opposite sides of the house (or have their names recorded) to provide an exact, verified tally of votes. A minimum simple majority was required to pass the bill to the committee stage. The committee stage of the bill is the third step in the legislative process. It is a detailed, clause-by-clause examination of the proposals that takes place after the second reading and general debate. During the committee stage, the house resolves into a committee of the whole house rather than meeting as the standard legislative body, allowing for more conversational and repeated speaking opportunities. Members meticulously scrutinise each section or clause of the bill. The committee goes through the bill clause-by-clause sequentially, voting on each clause or block of clauses. MPs and ministers can propose specific alterations, additions, or removals to individual clauses. Any proposed amendment is debated, and the committee votes on whether to accept or reject the change. Once the committee finishes reviewing all clauses and finalising amendments, the bill moves to the report stage, where the committee officially reports its work back to the house for final confirmation before the third reading. Because it is where the exact wording of the proposed law or amendment is finalised, this phase is often heavily debated. For example, this bill required intense, late-night debate in the National Assembly last night before advancing to the committee stage. After the amendments have been adopted, another vote is called in the house to pass the bill by a two-thirds majority before the same process is repeated in the upper house, senate. If senate makes some changes to the bill, it then goes back to the lower house, National Assembly, for voting before being to sent to the President for assent.

TheNewsHawks

17,671 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🔥🔥🔥BREAKING 😥😥😥 At 4.50pm this afternoon, and with only token opposition from the Liberals & Nationals the Digital ID Bill was passed by the Parliament. A sad day for Australia, as the nation marches further down the road towards a totalitarian society. And never forget tricks used to stifle debate and public discussion. Contrary to precedent, the spirit of the Constitution and Westminster tradition, Labor introduced the Digital ID in the Senate (the House of review) instead of the House of Representatives. Then they guillotined debate in the Senate. And in House of Representatives, Labor shifted debate to the Federation Chamber where the Liberals put up token resistance with only one Liberal MP and two National MP’s bothering to speak on the Bill - and they didn’t even try any amendments to protect privacy or to try and safeguard against it being made compulsory . Thank you for everyone that fought - we won’t give up. If ONE NATION can wun enough seats at thevnext election we will repeal this bill.

🔥🔥🔥BREAKING 😥😥😥 At 4.50pm this afternoon, and with only token opposition from the Liberals & Nationals the Digital ID Bill was passed by the Parliament. A sad day for Australia, as the nation marches further down the road towards a totalitarian society. And never forget tricks used to stifle debate and public discussion. Contrary to precedent, the spirit of the Constitution and Westminster tradition, Labor introduced the Digital ID in the Senate (the House of review) instead of the House of Representatives. Then they guillotined debate in the Senate. And in House of Representatives, Labor shifted debate to the Federation Chamber where the Liberals put up token resistance with only one Liberal MP and two National MP’s bothering to speak on the Bill - and they didn’t even try any amendments to protect privacy or to try and safeguard against it being made compulsory . Thank you for everyone that fought - we won’t give up. If ONE NATION can wun enough seats at thevnext election we will repeal this bill.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

307,124 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

#WATCH | On RJD leader Abdul Bari Siddiqui's reported statement on the Women's Reservation Bill, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi says, "...If you see RJD's stance in Parliament, you can see that they have given their support to the Women's Reservation Bill... Not only RJD but several other parties had said that reservations for OBC women should be given in this... So what he (Abdul Bari Siddiqui) says now is not relevant... Every woman who votes has a right, and if they have the vision to participate in Parliament, then it is their right...This right was denied to them for many years, and the Women's Reservation Bill has provided it... Unfortunately, the bill that should have been implemented in 2024 has been postponed for a future date...It is not clear when it will be implemented."

#WATCH | On RJD leader Abdul Bari Siddiqui's reported statement on the Women's Reservation Bill, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi says, "...If you see RJD's stance in Parliament, you can see that they have given their support to the Women's Reservation Bill... Not only RJD but several other parties had said that reservations for OBC women should be given in this... So what he (Abdul Bari Siddiqui) says now is not relevant... Every woman who votes has a right, and if they have the vision to participate in Parliament, then it is their right...This right was denied to them for many years, and the Women's Reservation Bill has provided it... Unfortunately, the bill that should have been implemented in 2024 has been postponed for a future date...It is not clear when it will be implemented."

ANI

118,916 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

ABSOLUTE CHAOS With 4 minutes to midnight the Speaker RAMS the Voting Rights Act through with NO DEBATE from the Republicans who were all standing to be recognized! This bill will give minorities in the state a right to sue their county if they don't like the outcome of their local elections. Watch this absolute facism:

ABSOLUTE CHAOS With 4 minutes to midnight the Speaker RAMS the Voting Rights Act through with NO DEBATE from the Republicans who were all standing to be recognized! This bill will give minorities in the state a right to sue their county if they don't like the outcome of their local elections. Watch this absolute facism:

Maryland Freedom Caucus

102,962 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

#WATCH | Jagtial, Telangana: BRS working president KT Rama Rao says, "Women's Reservation Bill was already passed by the Parliament in 2023. There was no need for this Bill to be linked with the delimitation exercise. Knowing fully well that if 2011's census or latest census becomes the basis for delimitation, southern India will lose out heavily. Modi Govt introduced this Bill, which they knew very well, will not be able to get the 2/3rd majority that is required for a Constitutional amendment. Therefore, we as BRS, certainly express our deep concern and deep protest with respect to stifling the voice of southern India in the Parliament. We request and demand the Union Govt to fulfill the promise given to the women of this country because the Bill was already passed in 2023 with respect to women's reservation. If you have to do it, you can do with the 543 at present. All that we would like to tell you is make sure that the 24% seats that the south of India today has in the Parliament is kept intact. If that is not kept intact, this will lead to severe protest and resentment from the people of south India who have contributed to this nation in a big way..."

#WATCH | Jagtial, Telangana: BRS working president KT Rama Rao says, "Women's Reservation Bill was already passed by the Parliament in 2023. There was no need for this Bill to be linked with the delimitation exercise. Knowing fully well that if 2011's census or latest census becomes the basis for delimitation, southern India will lose out heavily. Modi Govt introduced this Bill, which they knew very well, will not be able to get the 2/3rd majority that is required for a Constitutional amendment. Therefore, we as BRS, certainly express our deep concern and deep protest with respect to stifling the voice of southern India in the Parliament. We request and demand the Union Govt to fulfill the promise given to the women of this country because the Bill was already passed in 2023 with respect to women's reservation. If you have to do it, you can do with the 543 at present. All that we would like to tell you is make sure that the 24% seats that the south of India today has in the Parliament is kept intact. If that is not kept intact, this will lead to severe protest and resentment from the people of south India who have contributed to this nation in a big way..."

ANI

13,445 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

It is not funny that MPs are being asked to finish their speech on a Bill within only 1 minute!! Dr. M. Thambidurai was, quite literally, left speechless. #RajyaSabha is debating the Bankers Book Evidence Bill, which was passed within 4 minutes in Lok Sabha last week, without any debate. Today, as RS takes it up, Opposition MPs are not participating (probably they walked out). Earlier when a DMK MP was speaking on the Bill, she was stopped midway and her mic cut off as she tried to raise opposition's demand on other issues. Now, only MPs from NDA parties are participating in debate and even they are asked to wrap up within 1-2 minutes. Law making in #Parliament has become a joke!

It is not funny that MPs are being asked to finish their speech on a Bill within only 1 minute!! Dr. M. Thambidurai was, quite literally, left speechless. #RajyaSabha is debating the Bankers Book Evidence Bill, which was passed within 4 minutes in Lok Sabha last week, without any debate. Today, as RS takes it up, Opposition MPs are not participating (probably they walked out). Earlier when a DMK MP was speaking on the Bill, she was stopped midway and her mic cut off as she tried to raise opposition's demand on other issues. Now, only MPs from NDA parties are participating in debate and even they are asked to wrap up within 1-2 minutes. Law making in #Parliament has become a joke!

Maadhyam

152,658 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

#Thread on crazy scenes from #RajyaSabha where #OnlineGamingBill2025 was passed WITHOUT any debate, just like in #LokSabha yesterday. See video👇just when a BJP MP starts speaking on the #OnlineGamingBill2025, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Rijiju cuts her to say that, there is disturbance, nothing can be heard (thought that MP was heard quite clearly) let's pass the Bill without any debate! Waah. This was always their plan. And just seconds before he was sermonising Opposition MPs for not cooperating and participating in debate on Bills in #MonsoonSession2025. Later, as a formality Rijiju said that let her speak because she was speaking in support of Bill 🙄 But by then the Bill was already taken up for voting. Before that, Minister Ashwini Vaishnav spoke on the Bill for about 7 minutes and MP Dr. John Brittas moved a motion to refer Bill to a Select Committee. Contd..

#Thread on crazy scenes from #RajyaSabha where #OnlineGamingBill2025 was passed WITHOUT any debate, just like in #LokSabha yesterday. See video👇just when a BJP MP starts speaking on the #OnlineGamingBill2025, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Rijiju cuts her to say that, there is disturbance, nothing can be heard (thought that MP was heard quite clearly) let's pass the Bill without any debate! Waah. This was always their plan. And just seconds before he was sermonising Opposition MPs for not cooperating and participating in debate on Bills in #MonsoonSession2025. Later, as a formality Rijiju said that let her speak because she was speaking in support of Bill 🙄 But by then the Bill was already taken up for voting. Before that, Minister Ashwini Vaishnav spoke on the Bill for about 7 minutes and MP Dr. John Brittas moved a motion to refer Bill to a Select Committee. Contd..

Maadhyam

12,081 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

#WATCH | Sivaganga: Tamil Nadu: On FCRA Bill, Congress MP Karti Chidambaram says, "Initially, the government proposed the FCRA bill. There was a lot of pushback from civic groups and from religious minority groups. The government seems to have had consultations with those groups. They haven't tabled the bill. Only when they table the bill will we see whether they have brought about any changes. But if the bill is brought about in the original format, we will stoutly oppose it because it is yet another example of weaponizing the law and bringing institutions and bodies, which are not aligned with the political ideology of the ruling dispensation, under their control. So, we will oppose it, but we'll have to see the final version of the bill if it's placed in parliament."

#WATCH | Sivaganga: Tamil Nadu: On FCRA Bill, Congress MP Karti Chidambaram says, "Initially, the government proposed the FCRA bill. There was a lot of pushback from civic groups and from religious minority groups. The government seems to have had consultations with those groups. They haven't tabled the bill. Only when they table the bill will we see whether they have brought about any changes. But if the bill is brought about in the original format, we will stoutly oppose it because it is yet another example of weaponizing the law and bringing institutions and bodies, which are not aligned with the political ideology of the ruling dispensation, under their control. So, we will oppose it, but we'll have to see the final version of the bill if it's placed in parliament."

ANI

38,464 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

BREAKING: President Biden just explicitly called out Speaker Mike Johnson on the Ukraine Funding bill. "Early this morning, the United States Senate voted overwhelmingly by a margin of 70-29 to move forward with the bipartisan national security bill. Now it moves to the House, and I urge Speaker Johnson to bring it to the floor immediately. There is no question that if the Senate bill is put to a vote in the House of Representatives, it would pass. So I call on the Speaker to let the full House speak its mind and not allow a minority of the most extreme voices in the House to block this bill from even being voted on." Shouldn't the House vote? Isn't that what Democracy is about?

BREAKING: President Biden just explicitly called out Speaker Mike Johnson on the Ukraine Funding bill. "Early this morning, the United States Senate voted overwhelmingly by a margin of 70-29 to move forward with the bipartisan national security bill. Now it moves to the House, and I urge Speaker Johnson to bring it to the floor immediately. There is no question that if the Senate bill is put to a vote in the House of Representatives, it would pass. So I call on the Speaker to let the full House speak its mind and not allow a minority of the most extreme voices in the House to block this bill from even being voted on." Shouldn't the House vote? Isn't that what Democracy is about?

Ed Krassenstein

1,253,160 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

More than 100 Labour MPs have warned that failing to pass assisted dying legislation would undermine trust in politics. Peter Prinsley, who co-ordinated the move, says the House of Lords - where the bill is currently being debated - should not 'impede' laws. Opponents warn the bill is flawed and any attempt to push it through would be unsafe.

More than 100 Labour MPs have warned that failing to pass assisted dying legislation would undermine trust in politics. Peter Prinsley, who co-ordinated the move, says the House of Lords - where the bill is currently being debated - should not 'impede' laws. Opponents warn the bill is flawed and any attempt to push it through would be unsafe.

BBC Radio 4 Today

53,160 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten