Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Mitron, #LokSabha just passed the 500+ clause #IncomeTaxBill WITHOUT any debate, within JUST 3 MINUTES 👏👏 (Must see video👇) But it didn't stop at that! Immediately after that, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2025 was also passed WITHOUT any debate, in next 1 MINUTE 👏👏 Oh, and before we...

381,747 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

37 Yorum

Maadhyam profil fotoğrafı
Maadhyam1 yıl önce

And for those who want to blame the Opposition MPs for not doing their job, for protesting, for not participating in debates, sure these are valid criticisms, as elected representatives, they are also accountable to #citizens. But as we have explained here, there is a predictable pattern to Bills being pushed through as Opposition is protesting. It plays out much too often, almost like a strategy:

Siddharth Sharma profil fotoğrafı
Siddharth Sharma1 yıl önce

Completely misleading post, the bill is the newer version of the one already introduced and vetted by the select committee. It incorporates the amendments suggested. Classic engagement farming

Maadhyam profil fotoğrafı
Maadhyam1 yıl önce

Already explained the flaw in this argument in the post here - And interesting that you are making this argument despite acknowledging yourself that this is a 'newer' version. How is any MP expected to verify the fact that 'it incorporated the amendments suggested' by Committee when there was only a 2 hours gap between introduction and passing of a Bill running into 536 clauses and 16 schedules? Amazing, the length to which we will go to defend 'a' government without realising the wrong precedents it is setting which can be exploited by 'every' future government!

Siddharth Sharma profil fotoğrafı
Siddharth Sharma1 yıl önce

There is a reason why I called it ‘misleading’ and not False. The post suggested that there were was no parliamentary scrutiny at all which was certainly not the case.

Prasad Kadam profil fotoğrafı
Prasad Kadam1 yıl önce

Debate with who really, when does the opposition really debates on relevant issues. It pains to see them ask stupid questions. A strong opposition is the base for good governance but unfortunately our opposition sucks

Maadhyam profil fotoğrafı
Maadhyam1 yıl önce

That is exactly what the Govt wants us to believe! But anyway, to your first question on 'debate with who really', aren't there NDA MPs, independent non-aligned MPs in Lok Sabha who could have spoken on the Bill, if the Opposition MPs are so useless? Why didn't the Govt let them speak?

Prasad Kadam profil fotoğrafı
Prasad Kadam1 yıl önce

I am completely with u, but if i am not wrong this was already vetted bill. But I am all for asking questions unfortunately I was disappointed on the level of questions asked during op sindoor discussions.

Maadhyam profil fotoğrafı
Maadhyam1 yıl önce

Already explained why a Bill being vetted by a Committee doesn't mean that no debate happens on it -

BesuroTansen profil fotoğrafı
BesuroTansen1 yıl önce

Absolute bulldozer autocracy in the temple of democracy. 👏🏼

K.P.Nagarajan profil fotoğrafı
K.P.Nagarajan1 yıl önce

Stupid, the bill stands vetted already. Select committee

Maadhyam profil fotoğrafı
Maadhyam1 yıl önce

The fact that this Bill was sent to a Select Committee is certainly an improvement over most other Bills which do not get sent to Committees. It is, however, no substitute for debate in the House, for the following reasons: - The draft of the Bill which was sent to the Committee was replaced, Govt introduced a fresh Bill today, as mentioned in our post. - Who has analysed the differences between the draft sent to Committee and Bill passed today? How do we know the Bill passed today is better or worse than the Bill sent to Committee? How can we be sure that no 'new' clauses were added to Bill which would not have been 'vetted' by the Committee? The rules and procedures of #Parliament are clear. Bills which have been reported upon by a Committee also have to be 'considered' and passed in the same way. Sending a Bill to a Committee doesn't do away the requirement of debate in House. Also, the Govt wants to have it both ways - Most Bills it wont sent to a Committee and when it does, it will pass it without a debate. Waah Modi ji Waah! Calling us stupid won't change these facts! This is NOT how Bills must be passed in a #democracy!

Normal Guy profil fotoğrafı
Normal Guy1 yıl önce

Opposition protest is one part, but here the bigger rot is procedural capture, where agenda is altered hours before and MPs have no time to even read. This is not new, but scale is HIGH. UK Commons or even Sri Lanka follow notice periods. India is moving in reverse.

Mohammed Sameer profil fotoğrafı
Mohammed Sameer1 yıl önce

Wow, so efficient. Must be some Guinness world record!

Marco profil fotoğrafı
Marco1 yıl önce

Amrit kaal

✨Twit@Virgo profil fotoğrafı
✨Twit@Virgo1 yıl önce

Parliament’s new speed record… 👎 Passing complex bills in minutes, debate in seconds… Democracy fast track to silence and surrender... 🚩

SarkariLOL 🇮🇳 profil fotoğrafı
SarkariLOL 🇮🇳1 yıl önce

It was told earlier that it will be again discussed in lok sabha on 11th with the time all they want to do is roar as what is heard in bg of the video also had. Also the bill was in commities and variours changes was also done to that.

Proud Secular profil fotoğrafı
Proud Secular1 yıl önce

@ShashiTharoor will you open mouth now ?

X User profil fotoğrafı
X User1 yıl önce

Ye batao middle class ki aur kin kin tarahon se maari gai hai is bill me?

Good Governance Jokes profil fotoğrafı
Good Governance Jokes1 yıl önce

Only impacts 2% of Indians - So dirty corrupt and incompetent vote bank politicians don’t care

Emotional profil fotoğrafı
Emotional1 yıl önce

Every loophole will be used in current time for achieving their nefarious goals.

Cyber Internet Awareness profil fotoğrafı
Cyber Internet Awareness1 yıl önce

Meanwhile, the Opposition is busy protesting, but legislative business must continue. We are already in the fourth week of the Monsoon Session, and excluding today’s bill, only two bills were passed in the first three weeks due to Opposition chaos.

Ashok_Kumar profil fotoğrafı
Ashok_Kumar1 yıl önce

Don’t worry every law will be scrapped within 3 years let them change what ever they want but for 3 years only.

PRADEEP GOYAL profil fotoğrafı
PRADEEP GOYAL1 yıl önce

For your kind information, sh @KirenRijiju ji already informed before lunch that we will not tolerate any nuisance now and all important bills will be passed with or without the gang of thugs called opposition.

Sandeep profil fotoğrafı
Sandeep1 yıl önce

@Swamy39

Elon Muska 💥 profil fotoğrafı
Elon Muska 💥1 yıl önce

With whom to debate, opposition sits quiet only on days when they want to speak else they keep shouting. Government can't wait for them to maintain decorum and have debate because they will never. They find an issue everytime and create such ruckus in every session.

Aditya Verma profil fotoğrafı
Aditya Verma1 yıl önce

Bill is passed by those who have not and won't pay any Income tax.

rambo profil fotoğrafı
rambo1 yıl önce

were opposition MP's protesting at ECI OFFICE?

Thomas Shelby profil fotoğrafı
Thomas Shelby1 yıl önce

cc @CzarVT

The Cancerian 🦀 profil fotoğrafı
The Cancerian 🦀1 yıl önce

This happens when Opposition gives free pass with non sensical protests! Instead they could have debated on these bills and given reality check to govt

Niks profil fotoğrafı
Niks1 yıl önce

SM boycott & debate of every bill is new normal. Controlled Opposition & Compromised ruling.

tech_oc profil fotoğrafı
tech_oc1 yıl önce

When the opposition is not in a mood to run the house, what do you expect?

Vivek Chaudhary profil fotoğrafı
Vivek Chaudhary1 yıl önce

@grok What is SIR in this context?

عَرِيب profil fotoğrafı
عَرِيب1 yıl önce

@SauravDassss The sheep defending this govt here are so blinded by hatred they themselves don't realize that they're being led to slaughter. Your coming generations will curse you for what you've wrought.

Shilpi profil fotoğrafı
Shilpi1 yıl önce

Opposition doesn't let a single good work or a good decision to be taken, they only stall the work. What MPs did to pass the bill was perfect. OPPOSITION takes every opportunity to ruin the productive sessions, create ruckus.

Mr President profil fotoğrafı
Mr President1 yıl önce

Debate with whom the thugs who are hell bent to demonise the institutions of the country

@paddyatgmail profil fotoğrafı
@paddyatgmail1 yıl önce

This is what happens when opposition disrupts the houses instead of doing its duty in both the houses. @rahulgandhi should have gone to SC on vote chori. His duty is to be present in House and debate. Entire opposition is a waste. EC does not collect data,it is state governments.

Pravin koru profil fotoğrafı
Pravin koru1 yıl önce

Welcome to thuggistan ruled by modi shah piglets.

Benzer Videolar

It must come on record that despite widespread protests & repeated demand from Opposition to send #TransgenderBill to a #Parliament Committee, Govt insisted on pushing it through by making unsubstantiated claims! See video👇 First, it's rare that debate on one Bill is stopped to take up another Bill. The debate on #Finance Bill was going on and Transgender Bill was listed AFTER it, but Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju asked for the Transgender Bill to be taken up & 'passed' today and for Finance Minister to reply to debate on Finance Bill tomorrow. It is only when a Minister is not available to respond to debate on a Bill, that it is postponed, but Finance Minister is sitting right there! What is the rush to pass #TransBill in #LokSabha today itself? Second, as Rijiju seeks sense of the House, several MPs from the Opposition, in fact, oppose and categorically demand that Bill be sent to a Select Committee to consult with stakeholders from Trans community. They even say that they raised this demand in Business Advisory Committee meeting as well and Rijiju concedes to this. Rijiju himself says that Congress, SP, AITC and NCP(SP) made a request for Bill to be sent to Committee. And then Rijiju makes several unsubstantiated claims: 1. It's not a major amendment Bill - amendments to exclude self-identification are not major? 2. Extensive debate have already happened on Bill - When? The Bill was never placed in public domain as Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy 2014 mandates. Where has this debate happened? Who participated in it? 3. The amendment has come after a year long debate in Standing Committee - When? Which Committee? In the last 1 year, the Standing Committee on Social Justice & Empowerment has not produced any specific report on any topic related to #Transgender persons. Even the Statement of Objects & Reasons of the Bill doesn't mention any recommendation from a Standing Committee report. 4. We are not going against any community - why are people from trans community protesting the Bill then? So, if the Bill is very good, very important, for the welfare of people from Transgender community, then why is the Govt not willing to send the Bill to a Committee? Rijiju keeps saying - Bill has to be passed today, let's not delay. An MP can be heard in the background asking - "itni jaldi kya hai"? Indeed, why the rush? Why does Govt keep taking short cuts for law making and avoid public consultations?

Maadhyam

31,352 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Constitutional Amendment Bill (N0.3) unanimously passes to committee stage The contentious Constitutional Amendment Bill (N0.3) unanimously passed to the committee stage in the National Assembly earlier in the afternoon after the opposition neglected or failed to call for a critical division of the house for MPs opposed to the legislative changes to vote against it. About 30 MPs were opposed to the bill in its entirety after a record-breaking fierce debate. The failure by the opposition to call for division of the house let the bill, which has far-reaching political implications, pass to the committee stage unanimously, without formal opposition. In terms of process, the presiding officer first judges the will of the house using a voice vote ("Ayes" vs. "Nays"). If an MP challenges the presiding officer's ruling, they then can call for a division of the house. Bells are rung to summon all lawmakers to the chamber, the doors are locked, and MPs must physically move to opposite sides of the house (or have their names recorded) to provide an exact, verified tally of votes. A minimum simple majority was required to pass the bill to the committee stage. The committee stage of the bill is the third step in the legislative process. It is a detailed, clause-by-clause examination of the proposals that takes place after the second reading and general debate. During the committee stage, the house resolves into a committee of the whole house rather than meeting as the standard legislative body, allowing for more conversational and repeated speaking opportunities. Members meticulously scrutinise each section or clause of the bill. The committee goes through the bill clause-by-clause sequentially, voting on each clause or block of clauses. MPs and ministers can propose specific alterations, additions, or removals to individual clauses. Any proposed amendment is debated, and the committee votes on whether to accept or reject the change. Once the committee finishes reviewing all clauses and finalising amendments, the bill moves to the report stage, where the committee officially reports its work back to the house for final confirmation before the third reading. Because it is where the exact wording of the proposed law or amendment is finalised, this phase is often heavily debated. For example, this bill required intense, late-night debate in the National Assembly last night before advancing to the committee stage. After the amendments have been adopted, another vote is called in the house to pass the bill by a two-thirds majority before the same process is repeated in the upper house, senate. If senate makes some changes to the bill, it then goes back to the lower house, National Assembly, for voting before being to sent to the President for assent.

TheNewsHawks

17,671 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Free Speech is Dead Yesterday I managed to get in a three minute speech against the proposed hate laws before the bill was guillotined. Normally you’re allowed to speak for 15 minutes on the bill. I didn’t get a chance to explain just how draconian these laws are. Before this bill, prosecutors had to prove intent— that your words deliberately incited harm. Not anymore. The Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Bill 2024 lowers the bar so drastically that you can now be jailed for reckless speech. "Reckless speech" without any intent is now criminalised. Even if you accidentally offend someone you can be charged, found guilty and go to prison. A number of amendments to put in safeguards were moved including: 1) Removing mandatory sentencing 2) Excluding children under 14 from the bill and 3) A good faith carve out to prevent these rules from being used as a form of lawfare to shut down debate such as any of the below statements could soon land you in prison. • Marriage should only be between a man and a woman. • The LGBTQIA2S+ lobby keeps pushing radical gender policies on our kids. Maybe it's time we show them we won't stand for it anymore. Let's take action! • We need to stop mass immigration and expect assimilation because it brings division and poverty to our country. • The idea that gender is entirely a social construct is not supported by biological science. Those groups forcing people to accept this concept are dangerous. The major parties and One Nation did not vote for any of these amendments. In fact Malcolm Roberts voted against the exemption for children under 14 year olds. Pauline didn’t turn up to vote on anything. This is not unusual as Pauline didn’t turn up last year to vote on the 30 bills rammed through parliament on the last sitting day including the Online Safety Bill. When I said in my clip yesterday that One Nation voted for the bill that was what I was referring to. They didn’t vote on the final vote but if they were serious about wanting more debate then they should have expressed their view through voting on the amendments. To claim they needed more detail was a cop out. Clearly they supported children under 14 getting locked up for saying something offensive. By voting against stopping this and not voting for other amendments, Malcolm indicated more support for the bill than opposition. As someone with three children under 14 I was furious that any politician would agree to this. These laws are another nail in the coffin of democracy in this country. #auspol

Gerard Rennick

155,879 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce