正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Asmongold explains why COVID destroyed trust in America "The problem wasn't that officials were going through different protocols. The problem was that those protocols were not allowed to be questioned, because that's fundamentally anti scientific." "The scientific method is built off of assuming that you're wrong. There are theories... show more

Asmongold Updates

13,971 subscribers

11,316 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Matt Damon participated in Howard Zinn's great "The People Speak" series, and read out a great speech by Zinn about the importance of civil disobedience, which is as apt today as when he first wrote it in 1970: "I start from the supposition that the world is topsy-turvy, that things are all wrong, that the wrong people are in jail, and the wrong people are out of jail. That the wrong people are in power, and the wrong people are out of power. I start from the supposition that all we have to do is think about the state of the world today, and realize that things are all upside down. If you don't think, if you listen to TV, read scholarly things, you actually begin to think that things are not so bad. Or that just little things are wrong. But you have to get a little detached, and then come back and look at the world, and you are horrified. So we have to start from that supposition—that things are really topsy-turvy. And our topic is topsy-turvy: civil disobedience. As soon as you say the topic is civil disobedience, you are saying our problem is civil disobedience. That is not our problem…. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is the numbers of people all over the world who have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war, and millions have been killed because of this obedience. And our problem is that scene in All Quiet on the Western Front where the schoolboys march off dutifully in a line to war. Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world, in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running the country. That’s our problem."

Matt Damon participated in Howard Zinn's great "The People Speak" series, and read out a great speech by Zinn about the importance of civil disobedience, which is as apt today as when he first wrote it in 1970: "I start from the supposition that the world is topsy-turvy, that things are all wrong, that the wrong people are in jail, and the wrong people are out of jail. That the wrong people are in power, and the wrong people are out of power. I start from the supposition that all we have to do is think about the state of the world today, and realize that things are all upside down. If you don't think, if you listen to TV, read scholarly things, you actually begin to think that things are not so bad. Or that just little things are wrong. But you have to get a little detached, and then come back and look at the world, and you are horrified. So we have to start from that supposition—that things are really topsy-turvy. And our topic is topsy-turvy: civil disobedience. As soon as you say the topic is civil disobedience, you are saying our problem is civil disobedience. That is not our problem…. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is the numbers of people all over the world who have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war, and millions have been killed because of this obedience. And our problem is that scene in All Quiet on the Western Front where the schoolboys march off dutifully in a line to war. Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world, in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running the country. That’s our problem."

☀️👀

297,607 次观看 • 1 年前

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya says it is certainly possible COVID vaccines contributed to miscarriages in women vaccinated during pregnancy. “It’s certainly possible.” “You saw that reflected in Tony Fauci’s texts.” “I wrote a draft paper that we were never able to get published, where we found a slight increase in miscarriage in the first trimester.” “Whether that’s right or not, it depends on peer review and all that, which we didn’t finish going through because I became director.” “Other people have published papers that say that there has not been a rise.” “That debate then rages on in the scientific literature.” “When you are recommending something for pregnant women, you have to be pretty certain.” “The baby that they have inside of them is vulnerable.” “Instead of using that normal sort of common sense approach to recommendations for pregnant women at the time, what they were saying was, ‘Ignore all those harms, forget about the possibility, forget about the scientific debate, forget about all that nuance, and just say you must take it.’” “I think that was a tremendous mistake.”

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya says it is certainly possible COVID vaccines contributed to miscarriages in women vaccinated during pregnancy. “It’s certainly possible.” “You saw that reflected in Tony Fauci’s texts.” “I wrote a draft paper that we were never able to get published, where we found a slight increase in miscarriage in the first trimester.” “Whether that’s right or not, it depends on peer review and all that, which we didn’t finish going through because I became director.” “Other people have published papers that say that there has not been a rise.” “That debate then rages on in the scientific literature.” “When you are recommending something for pregnant women, you have to be pretty certain.” “The baby that they have inside of them is vulnerable.” “Instead of using that normal sort of common sense approach to recommendations for pregnant women at the time, what they were saying was, ‘Ignore all those harms, forget about the possibility, forget about the scientific debate, forget about all that nuance, and just say you must take it.’” “I think that was a tremendous mistake.”

MAHA Action

178,294 次观看 • 1 个月前

You can be wrong from time to time, we all are. But the same medical "experts" freaking out about RFK Jr. are the same people that tried to codify language that is flat out anti-scientific. Why the hell should we trust them?

You can be wrong from time to time, we all are. But the same medical "experts" freaking out about RFK Jr. are the same people that tried to codify language that is flat out anti-scientific. Why the hell should we trust them?

Steven Crowder

82,985 次观看 • 1 年前

Asmongold explained the main problem nowadays: people are taught to fear thinking for themselves because independent thinking can put you against the majority 👀😳 “It's not that people are trained to think institutionally, it's that people are trained not to think independently. Because if you think independently and you independently evaluate things, what you can end up doing is finding yourself on the wrong side of a consensus. You can't think for yourself. And I think that's the main problem. And so it's not that people can't think for themselves, it's that they're afraid to”

Asmongold explained the main problem nowadays: people are taught to fear thinking for themselves because independent thinking can put you against the majority 👀😳 “It's not that people are trained to think institutionally, it's that people are trained not to think independently. Because if you think independently and you independently evaluate things, what you can end up doing is finding yourself on the wrong side of a consensus. You can't think for yourself. And I think that's the main problem. And so it's not that people can't think for themselves, it's that they're afraid to”

Prism

11,701 次观看 • 3 个月前

Gill: “We're told that there's a problem that we can't agree on what's right and wrong, and I agree that is a huge problem. It's a problem that the other side of the aisle can't recognize that censorship is wrong. It's a problem that the other side of the aisle can't recognize that it's wrong for the FBI to target parents concerned about what they're learning in their schools. It's a problem that the other side of the aisle can't recognize that it's a problem whenever our federal government goes after Christian Americans. That's a serious problem, and that's something we should be able to agree on, but unfortunately we can't."

Gill: “We're told that there's a problem that we can't agree on what's right and wrong, and I agree that is a huge problem. It's a problem that the other side of the aisle can't recognize that censorship is wrong. It's a problem that the other side of the aisle can't recognize that it's wrong for the FBI to target parents concerned about what they're learning in their schools. It's a problem that the other side of the aisle can't recognize that it's a problem whenever our federal government goes after Christian Americans. That's a serious problem, and that's something we should be able to agree on, but unfortunately we can't."

Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸

10,904 次观看 • 2 个月前

ELON MUSK: "We need freedom of speech and the freedom of speech is only relevant if people you don't like are allowed to say things you don't like. It can't be that the government is deciding what is misinformation and what is not misinformation."

ELON MUSK: "We need freedom of speech and the freedom of speech is only relevant if people you don't like are allowed to say things you don't like. It can't be that the government is deciding what is misinformation and what is not misinformation."

DogeDesigner

269,906 次观看 • 1 年前

.Naval: Epistemology, which is a fancy word for the theory of how knowledge grows or how knowledge growth occurs. And we've all been told since we're young that there's a scientific method and that scientists sort of do this stuff in white lab coats and we're supposed to accept it because of this thing called the scientific method. And then they give us true beliefs that we can then say, well the science is settled and we take that we move on. And we all only have a very, very vague understanding of how this works. And people say, well maybe you go out in the real world, you look at what's happening, you make all these observations, and then based on that you form a theory, you test the theory against more observations, and the more observations you get the closer you get to the truth. And once you have enough observation it's true and then you call it a scientific theory or a law and it's settled and you move on. And this is the popular conception of how science works. And as Popper pointed out and as you take even further, this is completely wrong. And so I'd love for you to get into that, which is what is knowledge? How does it grow? What is the real scientific method? And how do we figure things out? David Deutsch: I love the way you just stated the prevailing view there and laced every aspect of it with the contempt that it deserves. So you just went through touching every base. It's amazing that this series of misconceptions is still common sense. I mean, that it was common sense at a time when we didn't really have science or when science was just starting up, when the main issue in science was freeing itself from dogmatism, freeing itself from religion, freeing itself from authority, and so on. There it was understandable that people would look for an alternative source of authority and they would think, oh, it's sense impressions. We can see the world and you know, these religious people, they can't even see God and so on. And so we are confined to what we can see. That's where we get our ideas from. And as you say, that is completely false. Sense impressions, like all observation, even the most careful scientific observation is all theory laden. And theories are inherently fallible. I mean, we actually want to replace our best theories. Everybody who does a PhD is technically anyway, working to overturn something in the existing body of knowledge. You're not turned away at the door if you say, I don't believe this stuff, I'm going to produce something better. Whereas for most of human history, that was exactly what you were forbidden to do. The idea was that we already had all the important knowledge. If you want to discover something new, what you had to make sure of was that it didn't contradict the existing knowledge. Now, you have to make sure that it does contradict existing knowledge. So more or less. Naval: Yeah, it's this tradition of criticism that you've talked about in the West, that the Enlightenment really ushered in the Enlightenment era. David Deutsch: It has been institutionalized. So in many ways, our institutions are wiser than we are. So the institutions of science, for instance, have this built in, even if scientists actually don't always act that way. In fact, they often don't act that way, and act in a dogmatic way and try to preserve the status quo and are resistant to new ideas and so on. But the institutions, the way the procedures of science work, makes the right thing happen in the end anyway, regardless of what the people are trying to do. Naval: So you're saying the knowledge of the true scientific method is embedded in the institutions of science in the PhD process? David Deutsch: Well, the best scientific method that we know of, and one shouldn't really think of it as a method, you know, there's this wonderful lecture by Popper when he first was made a professor at the London School of Economics. He was made a professor of scientific method, and his first six lectures, I wish the rest of them were, the first six lectures are on the internet somewhere. And he starts the first one by saying, I am the first professor of scientific method in the British Empire. The British Empire still existed at the time, more or less. And so the first thing I want to say to you is that there is no such thing as the scientific method. And then he goes on from there. So this subject does not exist. So if any of you have come here to learn the handle that you have to turn in order to make scientific knowledge come out the other end, you're going to be disappointed.

.Naval: Epistemology, which is a fancy word for the theory of how knowledge grows or how knowledge growth occurs. And we've all been told since we're young that there's a scientific method and that scientists sort of do this stuff in white lab coats and we're supposed to accept it because of this thing called the scientific method. And then they give us true beliefs that we can then say, well the science is settled and we take that we move on. And we all only have a very, very vague understanding of how this works. And people say, well maybe you go out in the real world, you look at what's happening, you make all these observations, and then based on that you form a theory, you test the theory against more observations, and the more observations you get the closer you get to the truth. And once you have enough observation it's true and then you call it a scientific theory or a law and it's settled and you move on. And this is the popular conception of how science works. And as Popper pointed out and as you take even further, this is completely wrong. And so I'd love for you to get into that, which is what is knowledge? How does it grow? What is the real scientific method? And how do we figure things out? David Deutsch: I love the way you just stated the prevailing view there and laced every aspect of it with the contempt that it deserves. So you just went through touching every base. It's amazing that this series of misconceptions is still common sense. I mean, that it was common sense at a time when we didn't really have science or when science was just starting up, when the main issue in science was freeing itself from dogmatism, freeing itself from religion, freeing itself from authority, and so on. There it was understandable that people would look for an alternative source of authority and they would think, oh, it's sense impressions. We can see the world and you know, these religious people, they can't even see God and so on. And so we are confined to what we can see. That's where we get our ideas from. And as you say, that is completely false. Sense impressions, like all observation, even the most careful scientific observation is all theory laden. And theories are inherently fallible. I mean, we actually want to replace our best theories. Everybody who does a PhD is technically anyway, working to overturn something in the existing body of knowledge. You're not turned away at the door if you say, I don't believe this stuff, I'm going to produce something better. Whereas for most of human history, that was exactly what you were forbidden to do. The idea was that we already had all the important knowledge. If you want to discover something new, what you had to make sure of was that it didn't contradict the existing knowledge. Now, you have to make sure that it does contradict existing knowledge. So more or less. Naval: Yeah, it's this tradition of criticism that you've talked about in the West, that the Enlightenment really ushered in the Enlightenment era. David Deutsch: It has been institutionalized. So in many ways, our institutions are wiser than we are. So the institutions of science, for instance, have this built in, even if scientists actually don't always act that way. In fact, they often don't act that way, and act in a dogmatic way and try to preserve the status quo and are resistant to new ideas and so on. But the institutions, the way the procedures of science work, makes the right thing happen in the end anyway, regardless of what the people are trying to do. Naval: So you're saying the knowledge of the true scientific method is embedded in the institutions of science in the PhD process? David Deutsch: Well, the best scientific method that we know of, and one shouldn't really think of it as a method, you know, there's this wonderful lecture by Popper when he first was made a professor at the London School of Economics. He was made a professor of scientific method, and his first six lectures, I wish the rest of them were, the first six lectures are on the internet somewhere. And he starts the first one by saying, I am the first professor of scientific method in the British Empire. The British Empire still existed at the time, more or less. And so the first thing I want to say to you is that there is no such thing as the scientific method. And then he goes on from there. So this subject does not exist. So if any of you have come here to learn the handle that you have to turn in order to make scientific knowledge come out the other end, you're going to be disappointed.

Deutsch Explains

116,352 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk: We have to have free speech in order for civilization to advance. “It's a bigger deal than you'd think. It's the kind of thing that you don't know what you're missing until you don't have it. In a lot of places, people don't have it. It's important to bear in mind that the nature of free speech is, the acid test for it is, are people you don't like allowed to say things that you don't like? Otherwise it's not free. It can't be just be things that you like because eventually somebody's not going to like what you say and they're going to shut you up. That's the essence of free speech. That's why it's the First Amendment in this country. And if we lose that, I think we lose the bedrock of democracy.” From: NBC Universal Marketing Conference, April 18, 2023

Elon Musk: We have to have free speech in order for civilization to advance. “It's a bigger deal than you'd think. It's the kind of thing that you don't know what you're missing until you don't have it. In a lot of places, people don't have it. It's important to bear in mind that the nature of free speech is, the acid test for it is, are people you don't like allowed to say things that you don't like? Otherwise it's not free. It can't be just be things that you like because eventually somebody's not going to like what you say and they're going to shut you up. That's the essence of free speech. That's why it's the First Amendment in this country. And if we lose that, I think we lose the bedrock of democracy.” From: NBC Universal Marketing Conference, April 18, 2023

ELON CLIPS

33,631 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨🚨🚨"Democracy" is a Psyop!!! "You ask a hundred people on the street, what kind of government is America supposed to be? 99% of them will tell you, a democracy. America is supposed to be a democracy. But THAT'S A LIE. That's an illusion. The word democracy is not written into the Constitution at one time. It's not in the Bill of Rights. It's not in the Declaration of Independence. The founding fathers hated the idea of a democracy. They thought it was the worst form of government there is. And I agree with them, because in a democracy, 51% of the people control 49% of the people. If you're part of the 49%, you're not free. America was founded as a constitutional republic, and in that constitutional republic that we have, 99% of the people can't take away the rights of 1%. You have your rights because you were born with them. You have God given human rights that nobody can take away from you—the government, the majority, no matter who they are. I can't take away your rights. And that's what our founding fathers gave us. But the psychological operations that they do to us, they make us believe that we're a democracy and that majority rules, you see? And they want you to believe that."

🚨🚨🚨"Democracy" is a Psyop!!! "You ask a hundred people on the street, what kind of government is America supposed to be? 99% of them will tell you, a democracy. America is supposed to be a democracy. But THAT'S A LIE. That's an illusion. The word democracy is not written into the Constitution at one time. It's not in the Bill of Rights. It's not in the Declaration of Independence. The founding fathers hated the idea of a democracy. They thought it was the worst form of government there is. And I agree with them, because in a democracy, 51% of the people control 49% of the people. If you're part of the 49%, you're not free. America was founded as a constitutional republic, and in that constitutional republic that we have, 99% of the people can't take away the rights of 1%. You have your rights because you were born with them. You have God given human rights that nobody can take away from you—the government, the majority, no matter who they are. I can't take away your rights. And that's what our founding fathers gave us. But the psychological operations that they do to us, they make us believe that we're a democracy and that majority rules, you see? And they want you to believe that."

Red Pill USA

760,219 次观看 • 2 年前

McGovern: Can you explain what is happening with the Iran war powers resolution that was scheduled to be voted on this evening? Are we not voting on it because the American people are sick and tired of this illegal war that is costing tens of billions of dollars? Gas prices are through the roof. People can't afford their groceries. Is that why you're pulling it? You guys don't have the guts or the balls…

McGovern: Can you explain what is happening with the Iran war powers resolution that was scheduled to be voted on this evening? Are we not voting on it because the American people are sick and tired of this illegal war that is costing tens of billions of dollars? Gas prices are through the roof. People can't afford their groceries. Is that why you're pulling it? You guys don't have the guts or the balls…

Acyn

247,632 次观看 • 4 个月前

Trump: I hope we get cooperation from the courts because you know, we have thousands of people that are ready to go out. And you cannot have a trial for all of these people. The system was not meant that not -- we don't think there is anything that says… We are getting them out. And a judge cannot say no, you have to have a trial. The trial is going to take two years. No, we are going to have a very dangerous country if we are not allowed to do what we are entitled to do.

Trump: I hope we get cooperation from the courts because you know, we have thousands of people that are ready to go out. And you cannot have a trial for all of these people. The system was not meant that not -- we don't think there is anything that says… We are getting them out. And a judge cannot say no, you have to have a trial. The trial is going to take two years. No, we are going to have a very dangerous country if we are not allowed to do what we are entitled to do.

Acyn

327,595 次观看 • 1 年前

Neil deGrasse Tyson Embarrasses Himself as Bill Maher Exposes Disgraceful Scientific American Article “Well, I'm gonna file you under part of the problem.” The article claimed that the “inequity” between male and female athletes isn’t because of natural biological differences but because of how they’re treated differently in sports. Neil failed to see what the big deal was. MAHER: “But engage with the idea here. What I'm asking is, Scientific American is saying basically that the reason why an NBA WNBA team can't beat the Lakers is because of societal bias.” TYSON: “What you're saying is not Scientific American says that. An editor for Scientific American says that, who no longer has the job. So don't indict a 170-year-old magazine because somebody—” MAHER: “Okay, this is called Scientific American, and they're printing something. Why can't you just talk about science? Why can't you just say this is not scientific and Scientific American should do better?” TYSON: “Well, does she still have her job?” MAHER: “No, not because of this. I said the scandal is not her tweet. I think a year ago [when this was printed], women still couldn't beat men in basketball or any other sport. And it wasn't because of society. You don't see a problem?... “Well, I'm gonna file you under part of the problem.”

Neil deGrasse Tyson Embarrasses Himself as Bill Maher Exposes Disgraceful Scientific American Article “Well, I'm gonna file you under part of the problem.” The article claimed that the “inequity” between male and female athletes isn’t because of natural biological differences but because of how they’re treated differently in sports. Neil failed to see what the big deal was. MAHER: “But engage with the idea here. What I'm asking is, Scientific American is saying basically that the reason why an NBA WNBA team can't beat the Lakers is because of societal bias.” TYSON: “What you're saying is not Scientific American says that. An editor for Scientific American says that, who no longer has the job. So don't indict a 170-year-old magazine because somebody—” MAHER: “Okay, this is called Scientific American, and they're printing something. Why can't you just talk about science? Why can't you just say this is not scientific and Scientific American should do better?” TYSON: “Well, does she still have her job?” MAHER: “No, not because of this. I said the scandal is not her tweet. I think a year ago [when this was printed], women still couldn't beat men in basketball or any other sport. And it wasn't because of society. You don't see a problem?... “Well, I'm gonna file you under part of the problem.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,267,420 次观看 • 1 年前

Joe Rogan and Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas get into a serious conversation about Fauci and “The Science.” ROGAN: "One of the things that was really weird about the whole COVID pandemic was that we weren't supposed to question science… when Fauci said if you question Anthony Fauci, you are questioning science." SRINIVAS: "That's because they try to assign credibility through their degrees, through their affiliations... but not through the scientific method. Anybody should be allowed to ask questions, as long as they are open to new evidence. And that's the most important quality of a scientist." ROGAN: "There was an actual government push to silence questioning, and legitimate researchers were kicked off of Twitter because they didn't back the narrative. This is all anti-science." SRINIVAS: "Curbing that is almost like a way of saying, 'Look, I'm going to tell you what happened. You need to believe in my worldview, and I'm not open to new perspectives.'" Science demands questioning. The moment someone tells you not to, they've stopped doing science.

Joe Rogan and Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas get into a serious conversation about Fauci and “The Science.” ROGAN: "One of the things that was really weird about the whole COVID pandemic was that we weren't supposed to question science… when Fauci said if you question Anthony Fauci, you are questioning science." SRINIVAS: "That's because they try to assign credibility through their degrees, through their affiliations... but not through the scientific method. Anybody should be allowed to ask questions, as long as they are open to new evidence. And that's the most important quality of a scientist." ROGAN: "There was an actual government push to silence questioning, and legitimate researchers were kicked off of Twitter because they didn't back the narrative. This is all anti-science." SRINIVAS: "Curbing that is almost like a way of saying, 'Look, I'm going to tell you what happened. You need to believe in my worldview, and I'm not open to new perspectives.'" Science demands questioning. The moment someone tells you not to, they've stopped doing science.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

194,809 次观看 • 2 个月前

Mark Zuckerberg: failure doesn’t matter. “The question is how much you win, when you win.” “Walter Isaacson wrote this biography of Einstein. One of the interesting things were all the theories he had that were wrong.” “People don’t remember those.” “We’re all going to get a lot of stuff wrong, what matters are the intellectual and cultural contributions we make that help push stuff forward.” “We have a resilient company that is not afraid of failure.” “That allows us to take some big swings and tolerate being ridiculed for long periods of time.” “If you’re trying to do something that’s really new, people have to think it’s ridiculous. If they didn’t, someone else would’ve already done it.” “In creation, the upside is infinite.” “If you build something that hundreds of millions, or billions of people like, then that makes up for a lot of ideas that didn’t end up working.” Via Complex

Mark Zuckerberg: failure doesn’t matter. “The question is how much you win, when you win.” “Walter Isaacson wrote this biography of Einstein. One of the interesting things were all the theories he had that were wrong.” “People don’t remember those.” “We’re all going to get a lot of stuff wrong, what matters are the intellectual and cultural contributions we make that help push stuff forward.” “We have a resilient company that is not afraid of failure.” “That allows us to take some big swings and tolerate being ridiculed for long periods of time.” “If you’re trying to do something that’s really new, people have to think it’s ridiculous. If they didn’t, someone else would’ve already done it.” “In creation, the upside is infinite.” “If you build something that hundreds of millions, or billions of people like, then that makes up for a lot of ideas that didn’t end up working.” Via Complex

Jawwwn

231,382 次观看 • 3 天前

"What advice should founders ignore?" "Almost all of it." Ben Fielding of gensyn: "As a founder, you have the absolute maximum information about the thing that you are doing. You can't give all of that information to somebody else to give you advice." "If you actually take advice itself, you are almost all of the time gonna be doing the wrong thing."

"What advice should founders ignore?" "Almost all of it." Ben Fielding of gensyn: "As a founder, you have the absolute maximum information about the thing that you are doing. You can't give all of that information to somebody else to give you advice." "If you actually take advice itself, you are almost all of the time gonna be doing the wrong thing."

a16z crypto

27,712 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨🇷🇼 PRESIDENT KAGAME: IT WAS IMPORTANT THAT WE HAD JUSTICE, NOT REVENGE “If you are fighting a brutality like that one, you can't be the one seen to be doing the same, otherwise, why did your people die, or why did you fight? The leadership had to step in and say, look, let's wait for the time we have a system in place to try those people who did those things. But you can't take the law in your hands, otherwise you will create chaos, or maybe we will see the same genocide of other people happening like our own people were killed.” Source: Paul Kagame

🚨🇷🇼 PRESIDENT KAGAME: IT WAS IMPORTANT THAT WE HAD JUSTICE, NOT REVENGE “If you are fighting a brutality like that one, you can't be the one seen to be doing the same, otherwise, why did your people die, or why did you fight? The leadership had to step in and say, look, let's wait for the time we have a system in place to try those people who did those things. But you can't take the law in your hands, otherwise you will create chaos, or maybe we will see the same genocide of other people happening like our own people were killed.” Source: Paul Kagame

Mario Nawfal

119,547 次观看 • 1 年前

Greenblatt: "We are seeing Jewish people, the Jewish state, blamed for the war in the Middle East. That is wrong. It is wrong to scapegoat, it is wrong to hold Jewish people accountable for something you don't like on the other side of the planet. We really need leaders on all sides in politics, running for office, podcasters, to stop with the conspiracies. You don't get to say you're opposed to hate if you're trafficking in hateful conspiracy theories."

Greenblatt: "We are seeing Jewish people, the Jewish state, blamed for the war in the Middle East. That is wrong. It is wrong to scapegoat, it is wrong to hold Jewish people accountable for something you don't like on the other side of the planet. We really need leaders on all sides in politics, running for office, podcasters, to stop with the conspiracies. You don't get to say you're opposed to hate if you're trafficking in hateful conspiracy theories."

Aaron Rupar

1,137,331 次观看 • 6 个月前