Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Astrophysicist Adam Frank thinks negative energy doesn't exist. Black Project Physicist Eric W. Davis says we're already producing it. "We're already producing negative energy through Casimir cavities and squeezed states of light. That's basically a modified laser beam." Academia is a failed institution. Equal parts egotistical and ignorant.

107,796 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von R. Souza
R. Souzavor 1 Jahr

No scientist should say that something doesn’t exist or is not possible simply because a hundred years ago, most of the tech we have today were deemed impossible.

Profilbild von Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbesvor 1 Jahr

It’s crazy that we haven’t really advanced from the same dogmatic mindset from hundreds of years ago.

Profilbild von Brian
Brianvor 1 Jahr

To me, academia has generally felt incredibly stagnant and ignorantly arrogant. Not a very good environment for true innovation.

Profilbild von Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbesvor 1 Jahr

It doesn’t get more obvious than a career academic with 6 books thinking negative energy doesn’t exist while an actual black project physicist with the highest clearances says we’re already producing it.😆

Profilbild von HUDI
HUDIvor 2 Jahren

“we’ll have to have some sort of Universal Basic Income (UBI)” Elon Musk But who is going to pay? We believe our data! HUDI = Human Data Income We are building a Universal Basic Income based on our data. Our data is our asset, the new oil, but we have no transparency nor profit from it. Help us build the Human Data Income: we made great progress, but it’s just the beginning!

Profilbild von tal yaron
tal yaronvor 1 Jahr

We think our universe is made out of atoms. I would start by saying that our universe is made out of energy. In fact, ninety six percent of our universe is made out of energy particles, and only four percent is made out of atoms, and those four percent atoms are also made up of energy particles. In his time, Albert Einstein concluded that matter can become energy when it passes the speed of light. Well ,energy can become matter just as well. Atoms and energy particles. Matter is made out of atoms, and atoms are made out of smaller particles, protons, and electrons. The protons sit in the middle of the atom while the electrons are moving around it. The structure of the atom makes it unique, and it creates mess. Due to the electrons, atoms can attach to each other and create all kinds of different matter structure, But I want to talk about a smaller particle, I want to talk about the particle that creates the protons and the electrons, I want to talk about quarks particles. Quarks are the smallest particles that we know off and which is building the atoms Protons and electrons. Quarks don't have mess, but they do have some kind of energy signature. It can be negative or positive. If you ever add the chance to hold two magnets in your hands, You probably notice that When one side of the magnet is negative and the other side of the other magnet is positive, the 2 magnets Are pulling each other. If they are both positive or negative, the magnets push away each other. The same principle is what makes the quarks particles as the building blocks of protons and electrons. Quarks particles pull into each other due to the positive and negative energy that is in them, making new particles of protons and electrons. The difference between a negative electron and a positive proton is determined due to the number of positive quarks and the negative quarks that assemble together. When most of the quarks' particles are negative, you get an electron. When most of the quarks particles are positive, you get a proton particle, that's why protons are always positive and electrons are only negative. Due to the positive charge, protons particles which are in the middle of the atoms are pulling the electrons who are surrendering them, while the electrons who are all negative are pushing each other away. Why are the protons always in the middle of the atoms? And the electrons are always circling around it. We will get to that later. For now, what's important to understand is that quarks, just like protons and electrons, have a negative and a positive charge, while the atom itself is a neutral particle. In an atom, the positive protons and negative electrons' forces are equal, and so the atoms Itself stay natural. Let me summarize. We have negative quarks particles. We have positive quarks particles. When they get together, we get positive protons and negative electrons who make atoms particles, which are

Profilbild von Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbesvor 1 Jahr

Yes, the universe is made out of energy. E = mc^2, so mass is really just energy.

Profilbild von Tommy Byrd
Tommy Byrdvor 1 Jahr

Dogma ruins everything.

Profilbild von William Bill
William Billvor 1 Jahr

After I watched this, which I did because I admire Lex, I was even more exasperated at the education my entire boomer generation received...such fucking deception from absolute top to absolute bottom!

Profilbild von Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbesvor 1 Jahr

And these people are teaching others incorrect physics. Their egos won’t let them admit they’re wrong.

Ähnliche Videos

Ever hear Albert Einstein’s voice? He’s him explaining his formula, E=mc² It is probably the most famous formula in the world, but what exactly does it mean? Let's start by defining each letter in the formula: E = Energy M = Mass C = Speed of light (a very large number) If we were to read the formula, we would say, "Energy equals mass times the speed of light squared." The formula itself is rather simple in that it essentially says that energy and mass are different forms of the same thing; they are interchangeable. So are you saying a beam of light and a banana are different forms of the same thing? Yes, in our head, this may not make sense, but it does in nature. This discovery was groundbreaking at the time because people had previously believed that energy could only be created by kinetic or potential energy. You can increase kinetic energy by accelerating your car. You can increase potential energy by stretching a rubber band. Einstein demonstrated that there was a third form, which is that things have energy because they simply exist. Ok, so why is mass multiplied by the speed of light? Whenever you are converting mass to pure energy, it is by nature moving at the speed of light. Pure energy is an electromagnetic radiation, which travels at 186,000 miles/sec (300,000 km/sec). Ok, cool, but why is the speed of light squared? This again has to do with the nature of energy. If an object is moving twice as fast as another object, it does not have twice as much energy. Rather, it has four times as much energy. Hence, the speed of light is squared, which comes out to a very big number. C^2 is the conversion factor from mass to energy. The bottom line is that even small objects have an immense amount of energy. Through the process of nuclear fusion/fission via nuclear power plants, we can harness some of this energy. In the atomic bomb that destroyed the city of Hiroshima, there was about 700 milligrams (equivalent to the weight of 1/3 of a dime) of uranium which was converted to energy that destroyed everything within a 1-mile (1.6 km) blast radius.

Historic Vids

2,424,168 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨America Just Changed the Economics of War… With Light For years Iran built a strategy around one brutal equation. Launch thousands of cheap drones. Force the defender to burn through million-dollar interceptors. Bleed the defense dry. It was simple math. A Shahed drone costs roughly $30,000. Stopping it with traditional missile defenses can cost hundreds of thousands… sometimes over a million dollars per intercept. Repeat that attack a thousand times and suddenly the defender is spending billions just to stay alive. Iran understood this. They designed an entire doctrine around it. Flood the sky with cheap weapons. Overwhelm air defenses. Make defense more expensive than offense. But something just changed. The United States Navy has now deployed HELIOS, a directed-energy weapon mounted on an American destroyer operating near Iran. HELIOS is not a missile. It is a laser. And it runs on something every warship already produces… Electricity. No missile to reload. No magazine to empty. No resupply ship needed. As long as the ship’s generators are producing power, the weapon keeps firing. That means the cost of stopping a drone is no longer measured in missiles. It is measured in electricity. In practical terms… Destroying a $30,000 drone can now cost less than the power bill of a large apartment building. That single change breaks the entire economic foundation of drone saturation warfare. For years Iran invested in the strategy that made Shahed drones valuable. Cheap. Numerous. Disposable. But if directed-energy weapons like HELIOS can burn drones out of the sky at near-zero cost… The math flips. Suddenly the attacker is spending money… while the defender spends almost nothing. CENTCOM has already released footage showing HELIOS mounted on a U.S. Navy destroyer in waters near Iran. Earlier tests confirmed the system successfully destroyed multiple drones during live trials. Now the system is deployed where hundreds of Iranian drones and missiles have been passing through the same airspace. This is not a laboratory experiment anymore. This is a real battlefield. And the world is about to find out whether the future of missile defense is not another interceptor… But a beam of light. Because when America decides to change the physics of war… It usually succeeds. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

790,245 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten