Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Baking soda—that unassuming white powder tucked away in every kitchen—has quietly earned a reputation as one of the world's most versatile, budget-friendly wellness allies. Far beyond its baking duties, emerging research highlights its potential to support everything from everyday digestive woes to more complex health challenges, all thanks to...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

431,538 subscribers

227,712 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Sağlık & İyilik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Many shampoos and body washes today contain sodium laurel sulfate, which strips natural oils, causing dryness, irritation, and hair loss. It weakens the skin's barrier and can trigger allergic reactions, making skin sensitive. But no worries, there's a simple household item with huge health benefits - baking soda! 🌸Sodium bicarbonate is a powerhouse because of its unique chemical properties. It balances pH, acts as a mild abrasive, and has natural antimicrobial qualities. This makes it perfect for everything from cleaning to skincare, proving that simple can indeed be powerful! 🌟Benefits of Using Baking Soda for Personal Care : 1. Hair - Removes buildup, keeps scalp healthy. 2. Face - Exfoliates for smooth, clear skin. 3. Body - Neutralizes odor, soothes skin. 4. Teeth - Whitens and reduces plaque. 5. Feet - Deodorizes and softens.. And using it is straightforward, just mix baking soda with water to create a paste or solution, then apply and rinse, to any desired place like teeth, body and hair 🌴Zero Waste Solution : Once you've used baking soda for beauty care, use it to clean your home! It’s a fantastic all-purpose cleaner. 🤔Fun Fact : Baking soda comes from a natural mineral called trona. It's mined from the earth and then refined to create the baking soda we use every day. It's simple, natural, and effective!
1:24

Many shampoos and body washes today contain sodium laurel sulfate, which strips natural oils, causing dryness, irritation, and hair loss. It weakens the skin's barrier and can trigger allergic reactions, making skin sensitive. But no worries, there's a simple household item with huge health benefits - baking soda! 🌸Sodium bicarbonate is a powerhouse because of its unique chemical properties. It balances pH, acts as a mild abrasive, and has natural antimicrobial qualities. This makes it perfect for everything from cleaning to skincare, proving that simple can indeed be powerful! 🌟Benefits of Using Baking Soda for Personal Care : 1. Hair - Removes buildup, keeps scalp healthy. 2. Face - Exfoliates for smooth, clear skin. 3. Body - Neutralizes odor, soothes skin. 4. Teeth - Whitens and reduces plaque. 5. Feet - Deodorizes and softens.. And using it is straightforward, just mix baking soda with water to create a paste or solution, then apply and rinse, to any desired place like teeth, body and hair 🌴Zero Waste Solution : Once you've used baking soda for beauty care, use it to clean your home! It’s a fantastic all-purpose cleaner. 🤔Fun Fact : Baking soda comes from a natural mineral called trona. It's mined from the earth and then refined to create the baking soda we use every day. It's simple, natural, and effective!

Barbara Oneill

177,474 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Thirst isn't something we have to stress about, as it's solved with a turn of the tap. But it's a huge stress for wildlife, as it's a killer. No matter how fit and strong, every living thing needs water to survive. It's been such a dry year that most natural water resources have been exhausted. So please provide. Be a lifesaver. The next heatwave is coming, so today get prepared - go through all your cupboards, visit the charity shop, and gather all the dishes, flowerpot saucers, casserole pot lids and baking trays you can and dot them around your garden, front and back, in the shade in the borders and in the open. If you don't have a garden put them out by your street front door. Please keep them topped up in the day, and refresh them all just before it gets dark. Rinse and repeat all throughout this heatwave. You may never know how many lives you saved, but I promise each one will be eternally grateful to you, as will I.
1:07

Thirst isn't something we have to stress about, as it's solved with a turn of the tap. But it's a huge stress for wildlife, as it's a killer. No matter how fit and strong, every living thing needs water to survive. It's been such a dry year that most natural water resources have been exhausted. So please provide. Be a lifesaver. The next heatwave is coming, so today get prepared - go through all your cupboards, visit the charity shop, and gather all the dishes, flowerpot saucers, casserole pot lids and baking trays you can and dot them around your garden, front and back, in the shade in the borders and in the open. If you don't have a garden put them out by your street front door. Please keep them topped up in the day, and refresh them all just before it gets dark. Rinse and repeat all throughout this heatwave. You may never know how many lives you saved, but I promise each one will be eternally grateful to you, as will I.

Hedgehog Cabin

20,955 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨🚨🚨 Dutch Cancer Researcher and Erasmus Medical Centre Assc Prof Maarten Fornerod discusses DNA contamination in COVID Vaccines. ---------------------------- ...for last 35 years or so I've been working uh in the areas of molecular biology, gene expression, biology, cancer biology and recently in the last years, maybe last 10 years in the context of big data and computational biology... ...when we use genetic vaccines what we do essentially is we're making a complex intervention in a very complex system. It's impossible to predict what happens if you combine these two complex systems, and you get unpredictable effects. .. And the only way to go about this is to do genotoxic research, when you want to introduce a genetic medicine into a human being and that genetotic research has to be independent, it has to be double blind, has to be long lasting. AND ALL THESE HAVE NOT BEEN DONE WITH THE GENETIC CORONA VACCINES! if there's a vaccine, there's a little bit of DNA in there upon injection that is very, very rapidly degraded by the human body. However if it's protected and in a lipid nanoarticle it can very efficiently be transduced in the cell... I've been doing this this many, many times. This is called lipofection and it's a very efficient way to introduce DNA into a cell. ...Many people think that this is not possible. But I've been working in nuclear transport for many years, I think more than 10 years. So I've been exposed to a lot of molecular cell biology of nuclear cytoplasmic transport. And it's clear that the DNA can enter the nucleus. Now to make things worse, the mRNA vaccine doesn't stay in the arm but it's detected in , in all different organs including the reproductive system. And so partly this is based on animal models, of course we know from Michael Morz that he has detected uh the spike protein in brain, in the heart and it's for sure it's detected in the blood and even in breast milk. ..So there's NO DOUBT that this mRNA vaccine spreads widely in the human body. ..Now from a genetic point of view, there are possible consequences uh of this and the consequences could be a 1. long term disruption of cellular processes that could lead to disease. 2. there's a risk of insertional mutageenesis in somatic cells that can lead to cancer. 3. the insertion mutogenesis takes place in a germ cell which would be a hereditary burden uh on the human population. 4. And you could also think that these um DNAs, could transfect the microbiome and it could possibly lead to bacterial resistance. So these are all possible..the consequences of these genetic vaccines in my view, the shortcomings in this rollout of these vaccines were there was no genotoxic research performed at all. There was no safety studies, on carcinogenic potential of these vaccines. My personal opinion is that it's now not a question of whether, it will integrate in recipient's DNA, but how often it occurs... It's just a numbers game. If you do this in many cells, many persons it will no doubt integrate in cells in human recipients. So the question does it affect the human genome? I would say it probably, I think it most certainly does. And you see Kevin McKernan here and he represented ah a preliminary data where he detected a possible Pfizer DNA in colon cancer biopsy one year after vaccination.
6:25

🚨🚨🚨 Dutch Cancer Researcher and Erasmus Medical Centre Assc Prof Maarten Fornerod discusses DNA contamination in COVID Vaccines. ---------------------------- ...for last 35 years or so I've been working uh in the areas of molecular biology, gene expression, biology, cancer biology and recently in the last years, maybe last 10 years in the context of big data and computational biology... ...when we use genetic vaccines what we do essentially is we're making a complex intervention in a very complex system. It's impossible to predict what happens if you combine these two complex systems, and you get unpredictable effects. .. And the only way to go about this is to do genotoxic research, when you want to introduce a genetic medicine into a human being and that genetotic research has to be independent, it has to be double blind, has to be long lasting. AND ALL THESE HAVE NOT BEEN DONE WITH THE GENETIC CORONA VACCINES! if there's a vaccine, there's a little bit of DNA in there upon injection that is very, very rapidly degraded by the human body. However if it's protected and in a lipid nanoarticle it can very efficiently be transduced in the cell... I've been doing this this many, many times. This is called lipofection and it's a very efficient way to introduce DNA into a cell. ...Many people think that this is not possible. But I've been working in nuclear transport for many years, I think more than 10 years. So I've been exposed to a lot of molecular cell biology of nuclear cytoplasmic transport. And it's clear that the DNA can enter the nucleus. Now to make things worse, the mRNA vaccine doesn't stay in the arm but it's detected in , in all different organs including the reproductive system. And so partly this is based on animal models, of course we know from Michael Morz that he has detected uh the spike protein in brain, in the heart and it's for sure it's detected in the blood and even in breast milk. ..So there's NO DOUBT that this mRNA vaccine spreads widely in the human body. ..Now from a genetic point of view, there are possible consequences uh of this and the consequences could be a 1. long term disruption of cellular processes that could lead to disease. 2. there's a risk of insertional mutageenesis in somatic cells that can lead to cancer. 3. the insertion mutogenesis takes place in a germ cell which would be a hereditary burden uh on the human population. 4. And you could also think that these um DNAs, could transfect the microbiome and it could possibly lead to bacterial resistance. So these are all possible..the consequences of these genetic vaccines in my view, the shortcomings in this rollout of these vaccines were there was no genotoxic research performed at all. There was no safety studies, on carcinogenic potential of these vaccines. My personal opinion is that it's now not a question of whether, it will integrate in recipient's DNA, but how often it occurs... It's just a numbers game. If you do this in many cells, many persons it will no doubt integrate in cells in human recipients. So the question does it affect the human genome? I would say it probably, I think it most certainly does. And you see Kevin McKernan here and he represented ah a preliminary data where he detected a possible Pfizer DNA in colon cancer biopsy one year after vaccination.

aussie17

126,273 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

This video is my experience of being transgender. 🏳️‍⚧️ Ive been seeing a lot of talk about trans peeps in the Vtuber sphere and just in general. How being trans can put you in hot water or something. And it's been on my mind a lot, considering the topic hits close to home and ive experienced it quite a bit. This is also for those who are willing to learn a little about what it's truly like being a trans person. Points like how it isn't a mental illness and that it's a process that takes time, effort, planning, and isn't a split-second decision. It's for the better. Not self-harm, but self-improvement. Hopefully, this voice will be loud as well in support of being aware of what it's like to be someone like me. It's hard and tough sometimes, but worth doing, so I can live my life at its happiest. Not just any of the negative ones who simply wish to just insult and use random BS as ammo instead of staying on the topic at hand, or just like to be a jackass. Rather than following the hateful, insulting, ignorant jerks who just wish to insult people like me. Research it for yourself, see the other side, and make your own decision, and properly make points instead of just insults. After this, I'll go back into my corner and continue to make funny doodles and entertain now that ive gotten it out of my system and hopefully helped inform some of you what it's like.
7:20

This video is my experience of being transgender. 🏳️‍⚧️ Ive been seeing a lot of talk about trans peeps in the Vtuber sphere and just in general. How being trans can put you in hot water or something. And it's been on my mind a lot, considering the topic hits close to home and ive experienced it quite a bit. This is also for those who are willing to learn a little about what it's truly like being a trans person. Points like how it isn't a mental illness and that it's a process that takes time, effort, planning, and isn't a split-second decision. It's for the better. Not self-harm, but self-improvement. Hopefully, this voice will be loud as well in support of being aware of what it's like to be someone like me. It's hard and tough sometimes, but worth doing, so I can live my life at its happiest. Not just any of the negative ones who simply wish to just insult and use random BS as ammo instead of staying on the topic at hand, or just like to be a jackass. Rather than following the hateful, insulting, ignorant jerks who just wish to insult people like me. Research it for yourself, see the other side, and make your own decision, and properly make points instead of just insults. After this, I'll go back into my corner and continue to make funny doodles and entertain now that ive gotten it out of my system and hopefully helped inform some of you what it's like.

Hayzi.nev Vtuber REBRANDING

10,787 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Scientists Reveal a Simple Technique to Communicate With Your Cat | Michelle Starr, ScienceAlert Cats have a reputation for aloofness (and floofiness), but if you and your feline friend aren't bonding, the problem might just be that you're not speaking their language. Never fear – research shows it's easier than you think. All you need to do is smile at them more – cat style. Not in the human way, by showing your teeth, but by narrowing your eyes and blinking slowly. By observing cat-human interactions in 2020, scientists confirmed that this simple gesture makes cats – both familiar and strange – more likely to approach and engage with humans. "As someone who has both studied animal behavior and is a cat owner, it's great to be able to show that cats and humans can communicate in this way," University of Sussex psychologist Karen McComb said when the study was published. "It's something that many cat owners had already suspected, so it's exciting to have found evidence for it." ... If you've spent any time around cats, you've probably seen their 'partially closed eyes' facial expressions, accompanied by slow blinking. It's similar to how human eyes narrow when smiling and usually occurs when the cat is relaxed and content. The expression is interpreted as a kind of cat smile. Anecdotal evidence from cat owners has hinted that humans can copy this expression to communicate to cats that we are friendly and open to interaction. To test that idea, a team of psychologists ran two experiments. The first experiment involved 21 cats from 14 different households. Once the cat was settled and comfy in one spot in their home environment, their owners were instructed to sit about 1 meter (just over 3 feet) away, and slow blink when the cat was looking at them. Cameras recorded both the owner's and the cat's faces, and the results were compared to how cats blink with no human interaction. The results showed that cats are more likely to slow blink at their humans after their humans have slow blinked at them, compared to the no-interaction condition. The second experiment included 24 cats from eight different households. This time, it wasn't the owners doing the blinking but the researchers, who'd had no prior contact with the cat. For a control, the cats were recorded responding to a no-blink condition, in which humans stared at the cats without blinking their eyes. The researchers performed the same slow-blink process as the first experiment, adding an extended hand toward the cat. And they found that not only were the cats more likely to blink back, but they were also more likely to approach the human's hand after the human blinked. "This study is the first to experimentally investigate the role of slow blinking in cat-human communication," McComb said. "And it is something you can try yourself with your own cat at home or with cats you meet in the street. It's a great way of enhancing the bond you have with cats. Try narrowing your eyes at them as you would in a relaxed smile, followed by closing your eyes for a couple of seconds. You'll find they respond in the same way themselves, and you can start a sort of conversation." Dogs may be much more enthusiastically demonstrative than cats, but this news isn't a surprise for cat lovers. Research in recent years has shown that our feline friends are much more in tune with their human housemates than previously supposed and that comparing them to dogs is a disservice. Cats, for example, respond in kind to humans who are receptive to them – so if you find cats standoffish, that might be a problem with you, not the kitty. Likewise, cats echo the personality traits of the humans they live with – this may be related to why cats seem to pick up when their humans are sad. They also can recognize their names (although they choose to ignore them a lot of the time). And their bonds with their humans are surprisingly deep. It's difficult to know why cats slow blink at humans like this. It's been interpreted as a means of signaling benign intentions since cats are thought to interpret unbroken staring as threatening. But it's also possible that cats developed the expression since humans respond positively to it. With domesticated animals, it's often impossible to tell. Either way, it does seem to help forge a rapport. And that's a good thing to know. Learning how to improve our relationships with these enigmatic animals could also be a way to improve their emotional health – not just in the home environment but across a range of potentially stressful situations. "Understanding positive ways in which cats and humans interact can enhance public understanding of cats, improve feline welfare, and tell us more about the socio-cognitive abilities of this under-studied species," said psychologist Tasmin Humphrey of the University of Sussex. "Our findings could potentially be used to assess the welfare of cats in a variety of settings, including veterinary practices and shelters." You're going to try it right now, aren't you?
0:59

Scientists Reveal a Simple Technique to Communicate With Your Cat | Michelle Starr, ScienceAlert Cats have a reputation for aloofness (and floofiness), but if you and your feline friend aren't bonding, the problem might just be that you're not speaking their language. Never fear – research shows it's easier than you think. All you need to do is smile at them more – cat style. Not in the human way, by showing your teeth, but by narrowing your eyes and blinking slowly. By observing cat-human interactions in 2020, scientists confirmed that this simple gesture makes cats – both familiar and strange – more likely to approach and engage with humans. "As someone who has both studied animal behavior and is a cat owner, it's great to be able to show that cats and humans can communicate in this way," University of Sussex psychologist Karen McComb said when the study was published. "It's something that many cat owners had already suspected, so it's exciting to have found evidence for it." ... If you've spent any time around cats, you've probably seen their 'partially closed eyes' facial expressions, accompanied by slow blinking. It's similar to how human eyes narrow when smiling and usually occurs when the cat is relaxed and content. The expression is interpreted as a kind of cat smile. Anecdotal evidence from cat owners has hinted that humans can copy this expression to communicate to cats that we are friendly and open to interaction. To test that idea, a team of psychologists ran two experiments. The first experiment involved 21 cats from 14 different households. Once the cat was settled and comfy in one spot in their home environment, their owners were instructed to sit about 1 meter (just over 3 feet) away, and slow blink when the cat was looking at them. Cameras recorded both the owner's and the cat's faces, and the results were compared to how cats blink with no human interaction. The results showed that cats are more likely to slow blink at their humans after their humans have slow blinked at them, compared to the no-interaction condition. The second experiment included 24 cats from eight different households. This time, it wasn't the owners doing the blinking but the researchers, who'd had no prior contact with the cat. For a control, the cats were recorded responding to a no-blink condition, in which humans stared at the cats without blinking their eyes. The researchers performed the same slow-blink process as the first experiment, adding an extended hand toward the cat. And they found that not only were the cats more likely to blink back, but they were also more likely to approach the human's hand after the human blinked. "This study is the first to experimentally investigate the role of slow blinking in cat-human communication," McComb said. "And it is something you can try yourself with your own cat at home or with cats you meet in the street. It's a great way of enhancing the bond you have with cats. Try narrowing your eyes at them as you would in a relaxed smile, followed by closing your eyes for a couple of seconds. You'll find they respond in the same way themselves, and you can start a sort of conversation." Dogs may be much more enthusiastically demonstrative than cats, but this news isn't a surprise for cat lovers. Research in recent years has shown that our feline friends are much more in tune with their human housemates than previously supposed and that comparing them to dogs is a disservice. Cats, for example, respond in kind to humans who are receptive to them – so if you find cats standoffish, that might be a problem with you, not the kitty. Likewise, cats echo the personality traits of the humans they live with – this may be related to why cats seem to pick up when their humans are sad. They also can recognize their names (although they choose to ignore them a lot of the time). And their bonds with their humans are surprisingly deep. It's difficult to know why cats slow blink at humans like this. It's been interpreted as a means of signaling benign intentions since cats are thought to interpret unbroken staring as threatening. But it's also possible that cats developed the expression since humans respond positively to it. With domesticated animals, it's often impossible to tell. Either way, it does seem to help forge a rapport. And that's a good thing to know. Learning how to improve our relationships with these enigmatic animals could also be a way to improve their emotional health – not just in the home environment but across a range of potentially stressful situations. "Understanding positive ways in which cats and humans interact can enhance public understanding of cats, improve feline welfare, and tell us more about the socio-cognitive abilities of this under-studied species," said psychologist Tasmin Humphrey of the University of Sussex. "Our findings could potentially be used to assess the welfare of cats in a variety of settings, including veterinary practices and shelters." You're going to try it right now, aren't you?

Owen Gregorian

31,307 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Retired pharma R&D executive says "the whole idea of vaccination and public health was always [about] eugenics"🩸💉 "it was always the mechanism the government... [used] to keep the population under control" "it's... especially [about] access to each and every body with injections, with needles. That's what they're always after" sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art" Andrew Kaufman MD ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- Latypova: "As I've been saying for a long time, this whole idea of vaccination, public health, was always eugenics idea. It was always the mechanism that the government, early on, the monarchy or some other type of government figured out that this is a great method to keep the population under control. "And they were pretty explicit about this in many, many documents, more contemporary documents as population control policies, population control strategies." Kaufman: "Well we even have vaccines that are used as birth control, right? They've been studied in, in, in clinical trials that are published." Latypova: "Oh yeah, I'm just— I'm going to publish about that. I found one paper that's, of course, in French, it's not in English, so I auto translated it, and it's very explicit. We are developing contraceptive vaccines for the developing countries for the purposes of population control. It's very explicit—" Kaufman: "I have a study published in English, very similar. It was done in Africa. I can get you a copy of that if you like...." Latypova: "So, the governments together with these 'scientists,' you know, I can't call them scientists, they are profiteers, off of this idea, like Koch, like Pasteur, Mechnikov, there was a bunch of Russian ones. So they started the whole idea of hunting viruses became very lucrative because if you could isolate and find something or virus or bacteria or some bacilli, like the Koch, then you could become rich and famous because you could be awarded big commissions from the government, given lots of power, and labs and staff." "And, of course, you can then patent your inventions and sell them in terms of rabies shots or tuberculin or things like that. There were attempts at vaccines for diphtheria, vaccines for plague, cholera, none of them worked, they all failed." Kaufman: "And they were, they were experimenting with different technologies at that time as well, right? Because I believe the diphtheria immunization was made from horse serum. Right? Rather than, you know, something in a culture or, or from a, from an animal lesion. So, sort of closer to what might be called today monoclonal antibody technology." Latypova: "Yes... it's very similar the monoclonal that they use horses for, commonly. That was how it originated. "Also, they experimented with injecting all sorts of things. So, for example, foot and mouth disease also at the same time was being claimed to be viral. And they would invariably, they will claim either it's a virus or it's a bacterial toxin, depending on the situation. "But it's always because they can't find anything in the solution that they make. So if they can't find any cells, then they will claim it's a virus or it's a bacterial toxin just because it's invisible. It's very convenient." Kaufman: "So this would incentivize the scientist or the businessman because there's a big commercial opportunity there to become rich and famous. But from the government's perspective, who may be financing these operations, it's a tool of eugenics and health control, essentially." Latypova: "Yeah, it's... especially access to each and every body with injection, with a needle. That's what they're always after. And it continues today."
3:49

Retired pharma R&D executive says "the whole idea of vaccination and public health was always [about] eugenics"🩸💉 "it was always the mechanism the government... [used] to keep the population under control" "it's... especially [about] access to each and every body with injections, with needles. That's what they're always after" sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art" Andrew Kaufman MD ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- Latypova: "As I've been saying for a long time, this whole idea of vaccination, public health, was always eugenics idea. It was always the mechanism that the government, early on, the monarchy or some other type of government figured out that this is a great method to keep the population under control. "And they were pretty explicit about this in many, many documents, more contemporary documents as population control policies, population control strategies." Kaufman: "Well we even have vaccines that are used as birth control, right? They've been studied in, in, in clinical trials that are published." Latypova: "Oh yeah, I'm just— I'm going to publish about that. I found one paper that's, of course, in French, it's not in English, so I auto translated it, and it's very explicit. We are developing contraceptive vaccines for the developing countries for the purposes of population control. It's very explicit—" Kaufman: "I have a study published in English, very similar. It was done in Africa. I can get you a copy of that if you like...." Latypova: "So, the governments together with these 'scientists,' you know, I can't call them scientists, they are profiteers, off of this idea, like Koch, like Pasteur, Mechnikov, there was a bunch of Russian ones. So they started the whole idea of hunting viruses became very lucrative because if you could isolate and find something or virus or bacteria or some bacilli, like the Koch, then you could become rich and famous because you could be awarded big commissions from the government, given lots of power, and labs and staff." "And, of course, you can then patent your inventions and sell them in terms of rabies shots or tuberculin or things like that. There were attempts at vaccines for diphtheria, vaccines for plague, cholera, none of them worked, they all failed." Kaufman: "And they were, they were experimenting with different technologies at that time as well, right? Because I believe the diphtheria immunization was made from horse serum. Right? Rather than, you know, something in a culture or, or from a, from an animal lesion. So, sort of closer to what might be called today monoclonal antibody technology." Latypova: "Yes... it's very similar the monoclonal that they use horses for, commonly. That was how it originated. "Also, they experimented with injecting all sorts of things. So, for example, foot and mouth disease also at the same time was being claimed to be viral. And they would invariably, they will claim either it's a virus or it's a bacterial toxin, depending on the situation. "But it's always because they can't find anything in the solution that they make. So if they can't find any cells, then they will claim it's a virus or it's a bacterial toxin just because it's invisible. It's very convenient." Kaufman: "So this would incentivize the scientist or the businessman because there's a big commercial opportunity there to become rich and famous. But from the government's perspective, who may be financing these operations, it's a tool of eugenics and health control, essentially." Latypova: "Yeah, it's... especially access to each and every body with injection, with a needle. That's what they're always after. And it continues today."

Sense Receptor

12,325 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

Big Pharma Is Profits Over People, Killing You For Profit & Vacations. Everyone In America Needs To See This ⛔️ “Cancer — Well, I will talk about that a better thing to talk about, however, is the relationship between profits and cancer in the United States. And there was a study that was published, I believe it was in 1994. It was a 12-year program, 12-year study. They looked at adults who had developed cancer as an adult, not childhood cancer, but adult cancer, right? And this is the main types of cancer that we get here in the United States. They did a meta-analysis of these people all around the world who developed cancer as adults for 12 years and were treated with chemo. And they looked at the results. And they published the results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. And the results? 97%. Of the time, chemotherapy does not work. 97% of the time, it doesn't work. So why is it still used? It's one reason and one reason only, money. If you go to a medical doctor, an MD, with a sinus infection, and that doctor prescribes an antibiotic, he gets no financial kickback. Now, if he prescribes 5,000, you know of that antibiotic in one month, the drug company that makes it might send him to Cancun for a conference, right? But he gets no direct remuneration. It's not with chemotherapeutic drugs. It's different. Chemotherapeutic drugs are the only classification of drugs that the prescribing doctor gets a direct cut of. So if your doctor prescribes chemotherapy for you, here's how it goes more or less. The doctor buys it from the pharmaceutical company for $5,000, sells it to the patient for $12,000, insurance pays $9,000, and the doctor pockets the $4,000 difference. And there ought to be a lot. The only reason chemotherapy is used is because doctors make money from it. Period. It doesn't work. 97% of the time. If Ford Motor Company made an automobile that exploded 97% of the time, would they still be in business? No. This is the tip of the iceberg of the control that the pharmaceutical industry has on us.”
2:43

Big Pharma Is Profits Over People, Killing You For Profit & Vacations. Everyone In America Needs To See This ⛔️ “Cancer — Well, I will talk about that a better thing to talk about, however, is the relationship between profits and cancer in the United States. And there was a study that was published, I believe it was in 1994. It was a 12-year program, 12-year study. They looked at adults who had developed cancer as an adult, not childhood cancer, but adult cancer, right? And this is the main types of cancer that we get here in the United States. They did a meta-analysis of these people all around the world who developed cancer as adults for 12 years and were treated with chemo. And they looked at the results. And they published the results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. And the results? 97%. Of the time, chemotherapy does not work. 97% of the time, it doesn't work. So why is it still used? It's one reason and one reason only, money. If you go to a medical doctor, an MD, with a sinus infection, and that doctor prescribes an antibiotic, he gets no financial kickback. Now, if he prescribes 5,000, you know of that antibiotic in one month, the drug company that makes it might send him to Cancun for a conference, right? But he gets no direct remuneration. It's not with chemotherapeutic drugs. It's different. Chemotherapeutic drugs are the only classification of drugs that the prescribing doctor gets a direct cut of. So if your doctor prescribes chemotherapy for you, here's how it goes more or less. The doctor buys it from the pharmaceutical company for $5,000, sells it to the patient for $12,000, insurance pays $9,000, and the doctor pockets the $4,000 difference. And there ought to be a lot. The only reason chemotherapy is used is because doctors make money from it. Period. It doesn't work. 97% of the time. If Ford Motor Company made an automobile that exploded 97% of the time, would they still be in business? No. This is the tip of the iceberg of the control that the pharmaceutical industry has on us.”

Wall Street Apes

339,709 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

When HTS and its allies toppled Assad in December, many were surprised by how they operated- not like a scattered militia, but like a real army. They showed discipline, structure, and professionalism that few expected. But for five months now, the PKK, Iran, and Israel have been trying hard to paint the new government in Damascus as just another version of Al Qaeda or ISIS. That’s why it’s so important for Damascus to take control- not just over the country, but over how its forces behave and present themselves. As seen in this video from today, there are still units acting in ways that echo the worst elements of the past. That can’t continue. Any group operating under the government’s name must act professionally. No more jihadi aesthetics, no more rogue behavior. The era of chaos must end. Even the small things matter. A haircut, a shaved beard- these might seem minor, but they send a clear message: this is a break from the past. The world is watching, and Syria can’t afford to give its enemies ammunition for their disinformation campaigns. If Damascus wants to prove it's building something new and legitimate, it needs to start acting like it- across the board.
0:45

When HTS and its allies toppled Assad in December, many were surprised by how they operated- not like a scattered militia, but like a real army. They showed discipline, structure, and professionalism that few expected. But for five months now, the PKK, Iran, and Israel have been trying hard to paint the new government in Damascus as just another version of Al Qaeda or ISIS. That’s why it’s so important for Damascus to take control- not just over the country, but over how its forces behave and present themselves. As seen in this video from today, there are still units acting in ways that echo the worst elements of the past. That can’t continue. Any group operating under the government’s name must act professionally. No more jihadi aesthetics, no more rogue behavior. The era of chaos must end. Even the small things matter. A haircut, a shaved beard- these might seem minor, but they send a clear message: this is a break from the past. The world is watching, and Syria can’t afford to give its enemies ammunition for their disinformation campaigns. If Damascus wants to prove it's building something new and legitimate, it needs to start acting like it- across the board.

𝐌𝐢𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐞𝐥 𝐀𝐫𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐢

12,638 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 JUST IN: Trump is at the Kennedy Center for the board meeting and a tour. He is totally overhauling it. He says they wanted to charge Lee Greenwood $30,000 just to sing there. Trump also says he is going to get with Speaker Johnson to fix its architecture. "We're here to have our first board meeting, Kennedy Center, and it's in tremendous disrepair, as is a lot of the rest of our country, most of it because of bad management." "We have a little problem with some people that work here. We had Lee Greenwood wanted to sing a little song today. And because of the cost in the union structure, for him to sing a song just for the board, just a board meeting, that was gonna cost $30,000. That doesn't sound too good. They wanted $30,000 to move a piano. So you can't have that. So we're gonna we're gonna fix it up." "It's really emblematic of our country. At the Kennedy Center, you look at the columns outside, you look at, I mean, they're supposed to be covered by something, whether it's marble or granite. They were never covered. They were painted. But, bring it into more modern times, a lot of money has been given to it, and the money has not been properly spent." "They built rooms underground with no windows, no nothing that will not be used ever. You're not gonna have people use them. It's such a waste of money, such a terrible waste, but we'll make it we'll bring it back. We'll make it great again. But it is so much like what I'm witnessing in other places." "We have open borders. We have men playing in women's sports. It's all the same thing. It's all the same mentality and thinking. So I'm very disappointed when I look around." "The bottom line, it has tremendous potential, and we'll work with Congress. As you know, it's a very public, a very public facility, and we'll do what has to be done. We'll be having a meeting with the speaker in the not too distant future. I think it's important to save this structure in this building."
2:18

🚨 JUST IN: Trump is at the Kennedy Center for the board meeting and a tour. He is totally overhauling it. He says they wanted to charge Lee Greenwood $30,000 just to sing there. Trump also says he is going to get with Speaker Johnson to fix its architecture. "We're here to have our first board meeting, Kennedy Center, and it's in tremendous disrepair, as is a lot of the rest of our country, most of it because of bad management." "We have a little problem with some people that work here. We had Lee Greenwood wanted to sing a little song today. And because of the cost in the union structure, for him to sing a song just for the board, just a board meeting, that was gonna cost $30,000. That doesn't sound too good. They wanted $30,000 to move a piano. So you can't have that. So we're gonna we're gonna fix it up." "It's really emblematic of our country. At the Kennedy Center, you look at the columns outside, you look at, I mean, they're supposed to be covered by something, whether it's marble or granite. They were never covered. They were painted. But, bring it into more modern times, a lot of money has been given to it, and the money has not been properly spent." "They built rooms underground with no windows, no nothing that will not be used ever. You're not gonna have people use them. It's such a waste of money, such a terrible waste, but we'll make it we'll bring it back. We'll make it great again. But it is so much like what I'm witnessing in other places." "We have open borders. We have men playing in women's sports. It's all the same thing. It's all the same mentality and thinking. So I'm very disappointed when I look around." "The bottom line, it has tremendous potential, and we'll work with Congress. As you know, it's a very public, a very public facility, and we'll do what has to be done. We'll be having a meeting with the speaker in the not too distant future. I think it's important to save this structure in this building."

Eric Daugherty

423,717 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

lando asked whether his relationship with oscar changed: “it's still the same. and i think we both are happy that that's how it is. it's because we both have a lot of respect for one another and we both understand the position that we're in. and we both treat the world of driving versus just personally what we're like away from the track, quite differently. that's how i've always been. i feel like i've always gone on well with my teammates since go-karting. i've always wanted to because it just makes my life more fun, more enjoyable and that's also why i'm here. it's because i love what i do, so the more i can do that, the better. but we still just very much understand that we're here, we work for mclaren, we want the best for the team. we work very hard and as drivers always do, you try and maximize your own performance more than anything. but then when we step out of the car, we can still have a joke. we still have laughs in our debriefs, and we still enjoy everything away from the track. so, no i think it's still better than ever in many ways. i think we're still very different people. he's very just calm down to earth, very relaxed, always looks just cool, and that's something i also admire quite a bit, is how just plain sailing he is with a lot of things. it's a good attribute to have. always hard to read what mood he's in, but i think probably for me, you see more visually kind of the moods i'm in. but otherwise, it's not like we go play golf together and do things like i have done with carlos, daniel i didn't play golf with. but we're still different people, but in terms of relationship, we get along well. we still work together well and i think it's still better than it's ever been”
1:59

lando asked whether his relationship with oscar changed: “it's still the same. and i think we both are happy that that's how it is. it's because we both have a lot of respect for one another and we both understand the position that we're in. and we both treat the world of driving versus just personally what we're like away from the track, quite differently. that's how i've always been. i feel like i've always gone on well with my teammates since go-karting. i've always wanted to because it just makes my life more fun, more enjoyable and that's also why i'm here. it's because i love what i do, so the more i can do that, the better. but we still just very much understand that we're here, we work for mclaren, we want the best for the team. we work very hard and as drivers always do, you try and maximize your own performance more than anything. but then when we step out of the car, we can still have a joke. we still have laughs in our debriefs, and we still enjoy everything away from the track. so, no i think it's still better than ever in many ways. i think we're still very different people. he's very just calm down to earth, very relaxed, always looks just cool, and that's something i also admire quite a bit, is how just plain sailing he is with a lot of things. it's a good attribute to have. always hard to read what mood he's in, but i think probably for me, you see more visually kind of the moods i'm in. but otherwise, it's not like we go play golf together and do things like i have done with carlos, daniel i didn't play golf with. but we're still different people, but in terms of relationship, we get along well. we still work together well and i think it's still better than it's ever been”

ray

129,217 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Great question! 🤔 How do you simulate *multiple* layers of glass/refraction in video games? In the last breakdown, I discussed how to create a glass shader in Unity URP. In essence, we were taking the render of the scene from the camera without any transparent objects. This is available in URP as the global _CameraOpaqueTexture. This is good enough for most use-cases, and more or less the classic way of doing it. 🔍 What is _CameraOpaqueTexture? As the name implies, there are no transparent objects rendered into this texture, so it's not possible by default to have something like a transparent-type ocean material/shader rendered through a refractive glass shader (which samples and distorts this texture to render on its surface, as if it's transparent). ⚠️ Why it’s tricky: It's much easier to sort without much further setup if you don't have refraction, and only a transparent material, because in that case you're not simulating the transparency yourself via sampling the rendered scene texture. But for refraction, it's required-- unless you want to go down the ray/path tracing route. You could simulate accurate, real dispersion... and that's about as expensive as it sounds, and it requires a rework of your entire rendering. --> 🚫 It's not a viable suggestion to offer. 📚 There are well-known terms regarding transparency sorting you can search up, but as you've specifically asked for refractive boxes, I'll discuss briefly about that. 🧱 Simulating layers of refraction: For this kind of rendering, you need some way to render the backfaces before rendering the front. And the backfaces that are rendered may contain whatever data you'd like for additional processing in the layer front-facing mesh render. 🧪 Examples: You could render the back face as a glass shader of its own, as an intermediate step after _CameraOpaqueTexture. Then you sample this texture instead and you end up with multi-layered refraction, "just like that". You can also render the back normals only, via a fully opaque shader, and use that to manually account for that during the front render. You could even bake in data needed for thickness in realtime. 🛠️ Without making it complicated for yourself, the most straightforward method is via render textures, and you can easily set some fractional resolution. Cameras in Unity have an open slot for target textures to render to. You can use custom render textures to process _SelfTexture2D. ⏱️ It's great to do low-resolution processing for more complex tasks, like blurring and caustics. You can get massive performance boosts, considering the square law and number of pixels/fragments that need calculations (quadratic scaling). 🚧 I've not fully exploited the possibilities myself, but research/development with PRISM is ongoing!
0:56

Great question! 🤔 How do you simulate *multiple* layers of glass/refraction in video games? In the last breakdown, I discussed how to create a glass shader in Unity URP. In essence, we were taking the render of the scene from the camera without any transparent objects. This is available in URP as the global _CameraOpaqueTexture. This is good enough for most use-cases, and more or less the classic way of doing it. 🔍 What is _CameraOpaqueTexture? As the name implies, there are no transparent objects rendered into this texture, so it's not possible by default to have something like a transparent-type ocean material/shader rendered through a refractive glass shader (which samples and distorts this texture to render on its surface, as if it's transparent). ⚠️ Why it’s tricky: It's much easier to sort without much further setup if you don't have refraction, and only a transparent material, because in that case you're not simulating the transparency yourself via sampling the rendered scene texture. But for refraction, it's required-- unless you want to go down the ray/path tracing route. You could simulate accurate, real dispersion... and that's about as expensive as it sounds, and it requires a rework of your entire rendering. --> 🚫 It's not a viable suggestion to offer. 📚 There are well-known terms regarding transparency sorting you can search up, but as you've specifically asked for refractive boxes, I'll discuss briefly about that. 🧱 Simulating layers of refraction: For this kind of rendering, you need some way to render the backfaces before rendering the front. And the backfaces that are rendered may contain whatever data you'd like for additional processing in the layer front-facing mesh render. 🧪 Examples: You could render the back face as a glass shader of its own, as an intermediate step after _CameraOpaqueTexture. Then you sample this texture instead and you end up with multi-layered refraction, "just like that". You can also render the back normals only, via a fully opaque shader, and use that to manually account for that during the front render. You could even bake in data needed for thickness in realtime. 🛠️ Without making it complicated for yourself, the most straightforward method is via render textures, and you can easily set some fractional resolution. Cameras in Unity have an open slot for target textures to render to. You can use custom render textures to process _SelfTexture2D. ⏱️ It's great to do low-resolution processing for more complex tasks, like blurring and caustics. You can get massive performance boosts, considering the square law and number of pixels/fragments that need calculations (quadratic scaling). 🚧 I've not fully exploited the possibilities myself, but research/development with PRISM is ongoing!

Mirza Beig

51,429 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Use creatine to protect your brain from head injuries: Repeated head injuries can lead to second-impact syndrome, where a subsequent injury before full recovery causes rapid and potentially permanent brain damage. This is a significant risk for athletes, military, or anyone prone to traumatic brain injury (TBI) or concussions. But here's the good news: research has shown that creatine supplementation can help mitigate the damage caused by second-impact syndrome. In fact, studies have found that creatine depletion prior to additional impacts can worsen the damage to your brain. So, what should you do? If you do experience a head injury, it's essential to replenish your creatine stores as quickly as possible. Creatine monohydrate is a good option, as it's the most researched and widely used form in studies, and it's also one of the most affordable and available options. Creating a regular creatine supplementation routine can be beneficial for overall health and wellness, regardless of your risk level for head injuries. You can obtain creatine through both food sources and supplements. While it is possible to get creatine from food, particularly from meat sources (which contain around 400-600mg of creatine per 100g or 3.5oz serving), it can be challenging to achieve the high dosages needed through diet alone. Most studies on creatine monohydrate for brain injuries have used high dosages of around 20g per day, which is significantly higher than the typical dosages used for performance benefits. As a preventative measure, a daily dose of 5-10g may be sufficient for most people. However, if you know you'll be at risk of exposure to head impacts, you may want to increase your dosage to 20-30g per day for a week, split into multiple doses. Remember, the primary goal should always be to minimize the number of head impacts and injuries in the first place.
1:22

Use creatine to protect your brain from head injuries: Repeated head injuries can lead to second-impact syndrome, where a subsequent injury before full recovery causes rapid and potentially permanent brain damage. This is a significant risk for athletes, military, or anyone prone to traumatic brain injury (TBI) or concussions. But here's the good news: research has shown that creatine supplementation can help mitigate the damage caused by second-impact syndrome. In fact, studies have found that creatine depletion prior to additional impacts can worsen the damage to your brain. So, what should you do? If you do experience a head injury, it's essential to replenish your creatine stores as quickly as possible. Creatine monohydrate is a good option, as it's the most researched and widely used form in studies, and it's also one of the most affordable and available options. Creating a regular creatine supplementation routine can be beneficial for overall health and wellness, regardless of your risk level for head injuries. You can obtain creatine through both food sources and supplements. While it is possible to get creatine from food, particularly from meat sources (which contain around 400-600mg of creatine per 100g or 3.5oz serving), it can be challenging to achieve the high dosages needed through diet alone. Most studies on creatine monohydrate for brain injuries have used high dosages of around 20g per day, which is significantly higher than the typical dosages used for performance benefits. As a preventative measure, a daily dose of 5-10g may be sufficient for most people. However, if you know you'll be at risk of exposure to head impacts, you may want to increase your dosage to 20-30g per day for a week, split into multiple doses. Remember, the primary goal should always be to minimize the number of head impacts and injuries in the first place.

Andy Galpin, PhD

137,470 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Can United States manufacture robots? Matic Robots says "yes." It makes the best floor cleaning robot, that has won many perfect scores from Wired to many others. We love ours. But my trip there to get a tour from AI pioneer Navneet Dalal Navneet Dalal provided some real insights into how hard it is for a hardware company to make hardware in the United States. And how deeply AI is changing consumer electronics products that are going to be in many more homes soon. In this first part (Part II coming tomorrow) we get a look at how long it took for this company to go through prototypes to a shipping product. In the second part, you'll see the scaling hell that it takes to even ship a few thousand robots and the kinds of problems that scaling up a factory brings. Matic is one of my favorite small Silicon Valley companies. It has found what we call "product market fit." I just came back from CES where I saw many of its competitors, and the Matic wins because of not just the product thinking of Mehul and Navneet Dalal but because of their AI leadership. In a way their robot took many lessons from Tesla, from where to put the batteries to its bet on computer vision, which Navneet has been a pioneer in for years, working quietly behind the scenes. It is about to move into a new location that will allow it to grow to meet the demand that now is showing up (the boxes in its lobby show that it's outgrowing its current facilities). In terms of AI, it has aspirations of making a humanoid too, but it is taking a far more measured approach to getting there. By starting on the floor it can not just build world models based on real world data (customers are given a choice whether to allow its data to be used that way. Most customers choose to keep their data on the robot only, for privacy reasons, but if you opt in you can help them improve their models). They are using that data to understand homes. Navneet told me they hit very unusual situations in people's homes already that they couldn't really predict in simulators, like full-wall mirrors that confuse computer vision systems, or pools and water features in people's homes. Having real customers brings a ton of customer feedback about how to further improve the robot, and, as Navneet demonstrates in the second video, forces them to build a manufacturing muscle memory. Getting teams to work together, figuring out how to solve supply chain problems, from Trump's tarriffs, to a new one that showed up over the past couple of weeks. A supplier for its bags (one of the cheaper parts that goes into the robot) changed the glue it used, which caused robots to fail quality tests and the manufacturing line to stop. Reminds me a lot of the hell Elon Musk faced in its Fremont factory when Tesla was first starting to manufacture its Model 3, which almost bankrupted the company. Off the record Mehul and Navneet 🇮🇳 showed me some of the prototypes and plans for its next products that will show up over the next few years. Certainly not as sexy as Tesla, Figure, 1x_tech, and all the Chinese manufacturers are showing off already, but far better thought out for the typical Western home and AI plays a huge role in its future. It is the product that speaks for itself. It's amazing, and is about to get better this year due to AI. It's the first real vision-only robot to be in my home and I bet it won't be the last from this company. Real honor that they invited me over with my Insta360 camera (another company launched in my home, just like Matic was last year). In Part II we go into the factory.
14:24

Can United States manufacture robots? Matic Robots says "yes." It makes the best floor cleaning robot, that has won many perfect scores from Wired to many others. We love ours. But my trip there to get a tour from AI pioneer Navneet Dalal Navneet Dalal provided some real insights into how hard it is for a hardware company to make hardware in the United States. And how deeply AI is changing consumer electronics products that are going to be in many more homes soon. In this first part (Part II coming tomorrow) we get a look at how long it took for this company to go through prototypes to a shipping product. In the second part, you'll see the scaling hell that it takes to even ship a few thousand robots and the kinds of problems that scaling up a factory brings. Matic is one of my favorite small Silicon Valley companies. It has found what we call "product market fit." I just came back from CES where I saw many of its competitors, and the Matic wins because of not just the product thinking of Mehul and Navneet Dalal but because of their AI leadership. In a way their robot took many lessons from Tesla, from where to put the batteries to its bet on computer vision, which Navneet has been a pioneer in for years, working quietly behind the scenes. It is about to move into a new location that will allow it to grow to meet the demand that now is showing up (the boxes in its lobby show that it's outgrowing its current facilities). In terms of AI, it has aspirations of making a humanoid too, but it is taking a far more measured approach to getting there. By starting on the floor it can not just build world models based on real world data (customers are given a choice whether to allow its data to be used that way. Most customers choose to keep their data on the robot only, for privacy reasons, but if you opt in you can help them improve their models). They are using that data to understand homes. Navneet told me they hit very unusual situations in people's homes already that they couldn't really predict in simulators, like full-wall mirrors that confuse computer vision systems, or pools and water features in people's homes. Having real customers brings a ton of customer feedback about how to further improve the robot, and, as Navneet demonstrates in the second video, forces them to build a manufacturing muscle memory. Getting teams to work together, figuring out how to solve supply chain problems, from Trump's tarriffs, to a new one that showed up over the past couple of weeks. A supplier for its bags (one of the cheaper parts that goes into the robot) changed the glue it used, which caused robots to fail quality tests and the manufacturing line to stop. Reminds me a lot of the hell Elon Musk faced in its Fremont factory when Tesla was first starting to manufacture its Model 3, which almost bankrupted the company. Off the record Mehul and Navneet 🇮🇳 showed me some of the prototypes and plans for its next products that will show up over the next few years. Certainly not as sexy as Tesla, Figure, 1x_tech, and all the Chinese manufacturers are showing off already, but far better thought out for the typical Western home and AI plays a huge role in its future. It is the product that speaks for itself. It's amazing, and is about to get better this year due to AI. It's the first real vision-only robot to be in my home and I bet it won't be the last from this company. Real honor that they invited me over with my Insta360 camera (another company launched in my home, just like Matic was last year). In Part II we go into the factory.

Robert Scoble

69,229 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Two big steps towards our vision for @NotebookLM as the ultimate research platform: • Integrating Deep Research, with a set of only-at-Notebook features that let you explore the retrieved sources • Launching a series of Featured Notebooks curated by Google Research These developments are designed to enhance the full life cycle of research and scholarship: using the power of AI to assemble the knowledge base you need to advance your understanding, and then making your work accessible and intelligible to a wider audience using all the explanatory tools that Notebook offers. If you've used DeepResearch in the Gemini app, you already know that it's a pioneering advance in assembling complex, grounded information on any topic imaginable—collecting an entire trove of material for you and writing a nuanced research report that summarizes the findings. But because NotebookLM is designed to manage and explore potentially hundreds of sources, the Deep Research report is only the beginning of your journey. In our integration, Deep Research gives you an overview all of the sources it found during its research phase, with annotated commentary explaining how each source related to your original query. You can then choose to import some or all of the sources to the notebook, along with the report itself, which you can then explore or transform using the full suite of tools that Notebook offers: grounded chat with citations, Mind Maps, Audio/Video overviews, and much more. And it's that suite of tools that make the Google Research Featured Notebooks so compelling as well. Each notebook contains a curated collection of articles on a specific topic, published by the Google Research team. Think of them as a kind of knowledge base of Google's best thinking on a series of compelling research questions: How do scientists link genetics to health? How will quantum computing be useful? If you're a specialist in these fields, you can read the original papers or ask nuanced questions in chat and advance your understanding of the latest developments. But these notebooks can also make the complex but important topics understandable to non-specialists or students. Each notebook comes with pre-generated audio and video overviews, flashcards, and other Studio artifacts designed to make the scientific and technological concepts accessible and interesting. And you can always explore the material with our new "Learning Guide" chat mode that effectively gives you a personal tutor to enhance your understanding. There's much more to come on this front, but you can see in these two announcements how we see Notebook as both a workbench for conducting research and a publishing platform for sharing the results of that research once you're ready to make it public. Deep Research is rolling out this week to all users. The first two Google Research notebooks are live now, both of them deep dives into our most recent discoveries involving genetics and health. (Links in the following tweets.) We'll be publishing new notebooks in the series every other week or so for the next few months.
0:34

Two big steps towards our vision for @NotebookLM as the ultimate research platform: • Integrating Deep Research, with a set of only-at-Notebook features that let you explore the retrieved sources • Launching a series of Featured Notebooks curated by Google Research These developments are designed to enhance the full life cycle of research and scholarship: using the power of AI to assemble the knowledge base you need to advance your understanding, and then making your work accessible and intelligible to a wider audience using all the explanatory tools that Notebook offers. If you've used DeepResearch in the Gemini app, you already know that it's a pioneering advance in assembling complex, grounded information on any topic imaginable—collecting an entire trove of material for you and writing a nuanced research report that summarizes the findings. But because NotebookLM is designed to manage and explore potentially hundreds of sources, the Deep Research report is only the beginning of your journey. In our integration, Deep Research gives you an overview all of the sources it found during its research phase, with annotated commentary explaining how each source related to your original query. You can then choose to import some or all of the sources to the notebook, along with the report itself, which you can then explore or transform using the full suite of tools that Notebook offers: grounded chat with citations, Mind Maps, Audio/Video overviews, and much more. And it's that suite of tools that make the Google Research Featured Notebooks so compelling as well. Each notebook contains a curated collection of articles on a specific topic, published by the Google Research team. Think of them as a kind of knowledge base of Google's best thinking on a series of compelling research questions: How do scientists link genetics to health? How will quantum computing be useful? If you're a specialist in these fields, you can read the original papers or ask nuanced questions in chat and advance your understanding of the latest developments. But these notebooks can also make the complex but important topics understandable to non-specialists or students. Each notebook comes with pre-generated audio and video overviews, flashcards, and other Studio artifacts designed to make the scientific and technological concepts accessible and interesting. And you can always explore the material with our new "Learning Guide" chat mode that effectively gives you a personal tutor to enhance your understanding. There's much more to come on this front, but you can see in these two announcements how we see Notebook as both a workbench for conducting research and a publishing platform for sharing the results of that research once you're ready to make it public. Deep Research is rolling out this week to all users. The first two Google Research notebooks are live now, both of them deep dives into our most recent discoveries involving genetics and health. (Links in the following tweets.) We'll be publishing new notebooks in the series every other week or so for the next few months.

Steven Johnson

104,833 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce