正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Basic science is inspired by curiosity, accountable to evidence, and subject to peer review. Politics should have no role.

187,257 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Trust Me, I’m a Scientist 的头像
Trust Me, I’m a Scientist1 年前

If you want taxpayers to pay for it, you gotta justify the expense

Truth & Liberty 的头像
Truth & Liberty1 年前

Do you believe the Church has a role in shaping culture and politics? Join the conversation and follow Truth & Liberty for insights that empower action.

RIP 的头像
RIP1 年前

NIH grant-seeking is a crazy process where researchers are asked to do more with increasingly less — with ever more years of experience required on their CVs in order to even compete for funds. The median age at which researchers received their first R01 is 42. NIH funding also generally flows to safer bets.

777_follower 的头像
777_follower1 年前

I agree with this, however when you on the Left have determined to censor and decide what is real data and not on the political level it calls into question "science" What needs to happen is there needs to be a calculation on the investigation on the fiscal impact and determine if the squeeze is worth the juice.

Kenny 的头像
Kenny1 年前

Wait how much was the grant the Wright brothers were given? Probably not the best example.

Gamer 的头像
Gamer1 年前

What a dope. You mean like the "green" nonsense from your mentors Ed and Liz? Is that what you mean? Every time you post you are embarrassing the 4th.

Carrie🌻RN 的头像
Carrie🌻RN1 年前

@MeidasTouch Science is based on educated facts. MAGA is based on the uneducated disregarding facts for cult talking points.

Judy K NO DMS (She/Her/Hers)🏀🏒🍁🇨🇦 😷 的头像
Judy K NO DMS (She/Her/Hers)🏀🏒🍁🇨🇦 😷1 年前

Correct

Razz02748 🇺🇸 的头像
Razz02748 🇺🇸1 年前

So no more “settled Democrat” science?

Afueriste 的头像
Afueriste1 年前

So politicians should allocate no funds to it? You aren't very bright.

相关视频